[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-907":396},{"entity":4,"seo":348},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":188,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":292,"serviceTags":293,"serviceCategories":294,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":324,"homeStats":325,"serviceProducts":338},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,125,129,134,140,144,148,150,157,161,165,170,175,180],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":10,"summary":124,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},664,"王某某涉嫌非法买卖制毒物品罪、洗钱罪、出售假币罪、非法拘禁罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处理","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 非法买卖制毒物品罪 、 洗钱罪 、出售假币罪、 非法拘禁罪 结果 ：部分罪名指控不成立，法院依法作出二十年 有期徒刑 判决，并处 罚金 六千零十万元 亮点 ：成功击破犯罪集团认定标准，非法买卖制毒","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},663,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获从轻判决","案情简介 2013年至2019年，X某利用担任某县委书记的职务之便，为多人在某县承建项目、借款、退还已缴土地滞纳金等事项上提供帮助，先后十余次收受多人现金等礼品。 案发后，被告人X某于2019年8月8日主动到四川省监察委员会投案，交代了部分",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},662,"Z某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","案情简介 2015年至2017年，被调查人Z某 伙同 时任某某公司董事长、总经理L，利用L职务上的便利， 私自使用某某公司20000万元定期存款存单质押担保贷款29400万元，用于营利活动。同时涉及受贿罪、行贿罪。 辩护思路 一、Z某单独受",{"id":149,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},661,{"id":151,"title":152,"thumbnail":153,"summary":154,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},660,"H某涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fd0544967-0fd4-44ce-b977-8c6b2c0bf3e4.png","【案情简述】 H某因涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪被羁押于遂宁市公安局某区分局。 【办案过程】 针对本案的定性无异议，但是本案于一般的生产、销售有毒有害食品以及狭义的“地沟油”犯罪而言，其社会危害性极低；H某在本案中虽然为相关涉事门店的股东之一","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},659,"Z某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，未变更罪名减轻处罚","一、案情简介 z某涉嫌在其公司旗下的多家知名火锅连锁店中制造销售回油，也就是俗称”地沟油“火锅底料给食客食用，未造成人体健康损害后果。 二、辩护思路 1、刘某制作的《2019年汇总表》、《XX出库年度详表》未按照法律规定获取，与在案的其他证",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},658,"S某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（公诉机关指控）→ 非法经营罪（辩护意见） 结果：法院认定构成生产、销售伪劣产品罪，判处S某有期徒刑15年，罚金350万元。 亮点： 1. 证据链突破：成功质疑检测报告合法性，推翻",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":168,"summary":169,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},657,"涂某某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fa9d1a426-12fb-492a-a4be-f36bc5ad280e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（未遂） 结果：有期徒刑一年五个月（较检察院量刑建议降低50%），罚金五万元 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期； 2. 通过证据对抗推翻74万元销",{"id":171,"title":172,"thumbnail":173,"summary":174,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},656,"H某涉嫌生产、销售不符合安全标准食品罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F1ae54d80-b6b0-42f3-9eb4-5628548c7c21.png","一、案情简介 2020年12月，成都市某地区爆发新冠疫情，该地区的生鲜经营冻库被要求全部关停。冻库关停的通知一出，则意味着商家库房里的全部冻货，将全部无法销售，只能废弃。 部分商家为保住自己的货物，冒险继续销售冻货，其联合找到冻库房东H某，",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},655,"J某涉嫌涉嫌侵犯商业秘密罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，免于刑事处罚","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps493.jpg","一、案件罪名、结果、封面语 罪名：侵犯商业秘密罪 结果： 免于刑事处罚 封面语： 某生物科技企业机密案，J 某离职后涉嫌有偿披露信息，律师介入后从本案侦查管辖权有误、阅卷权遭侵，经营信息是否为商业秘密存争议，J 某行为未达犯罪情节严重标准，",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":185,"caseTypeName":186,"caseTypeCode":187},654,"D某侵犯公民个人信息罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fe43eb26b-6e6e-452b-ad54-ddd659fc49be.png","一、【案情简述】 2020年初，被告人D某在四川某大学读书期间，在网上申请注册（需要邮箱号、手机号、手机短信验证、姓名及身份证号等）、实名认证（本人微信、QQ扫码或人脸认证）“腾讯云网络帐号、购买和使用云服务器过程中，发现贩卖腾讯云账号（云",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",[189,192,197,200,203,208,211,217],{"id":38,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":193,"name":194,"summary":195,"keywords":196},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":156,"name":155,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":201,"keywords":202},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":204,"name":205,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":185,"code":187,"name":186,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[235],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,256,268,280],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":258,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[266],{"id":258,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":264,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":269,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":282,"city":283,"caseType":284,"title":285,"thumbnail":286,"content":10,"publishTime":287,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":288,"lawyers":289},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[290],{"id":282,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[295,300,305,310,315,320],{"id":40,"createdAt":296,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":31,"code":298,"name":299,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":301,"deleted":31,"code":302,"name":303,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":304,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":309,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":311,"deleted":31,"code":312,"name":313,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":314,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":185,"createdAt":316,"updatedAt":317,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":212,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":321,"deleted":31,"code":322,"name":323,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[326,329,332,335],{"value":327,"label":328},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":330,"label":331},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":333,"label":334},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":336,"label":337},"6","全国分所",[339,342,345],{"title":340,"desc":341},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":343,"desc":344},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":346,"desc":347},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":349,"description":13,"keywords":350,"canonical":351,"image":10,"jsonLd":352},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[353],{"@context":354,"@graph":355},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[356,362],{"@type":357,"@id":358,"url":351,"name":7,"inLanguage":359,"publisher":360},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":363,"@id":361,"name":7,"url":351,"logo":364,"image":364,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":359,"address":365,"geo":368,"department":370},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":367},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":369,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[371,376,380,384,388,392],{"@type":372,"@id":373,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":374,"parentOrganization":375},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":377,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":378,"parentOrganization":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":381,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":385,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":389,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":393,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":361},{"entity":397,"seo":408},{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":399,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":400,"thumbnail":401,"content":402,"publishTime":403,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":404},907,"2026-10-20 16:32:21","收钱只拿“分红”，也没签名字，影子股东怎么查？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F20\u002Fea46a44e-3a1b-486f-82c8-5fecf02dd932.jpg","\u003Cp>不出资、不显名，仅凭他人代持股份并获取分红，是否就能规避受贿罪？答案是否定的。所谓“影子股东”，是指未实际出资、通过亲属或他人代持持有股权并享有收益，借以掩盖权钱交易的情形。本文依据《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十五条、《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》（法发〔2007〕22号）第二条与第九条、《中国共产党纪律处分条例》（2023年修订）第一百零三条等现行有效规定，解析此类案件的查办思路与数额认定规则：监察机关围绕资金流向、分红合理性、实际控制等证据穿透名义、锁定实质；股份实际转让的，以转让时股份价值认定受贿数额、分红作为受贿孳息，未实际转让而以分红名义获利的，以分红额直接认定。同时说明“及时退还”“真实商业投入”等出罪或降格可能的边界，以及家属在涉及复杂股权问题时的应对要点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一、结论先行：不出资、不显名，不等于安全\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在职务犯罪案件中，有一种常见的错误认知：只要不直接收钱，找个远房亲戚代持股份，年底拿分红，且工商登记上没有自己的名字、银行流水不直通，就等于构筑了一道“防火墙”。这种认识在法律评价上不能成立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>干股型受贿的核心，并不在于“名字是否写在工商登记上”，而在于是否存在权钱对价——即国家工作人员利用职务上的便利为他人谋取利益，并借此无偿取得股份或分红。名义上的代持、资金的迂回流转，都只是掩盖手段，不能阻却受贿犯罪的认定。监察机关在调查此类案件时，关注的从来不是“谁登记为股东”，而是“谁实际出资、谁实际获益、谁在幕后控制、受益与职务行为之间是否存在对价关系”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>与此同时，此类案件也存在明确且可操作的辩护空间。是否真实出资、是否实际参与经营管理、分红是否与公司经营业绩真实挂钩、是否存在及时退还等情节，都会实质影响案件的性质认定与数额计算。换言之，形式上的“影子”并不必然导出刑事重罪，关键要看实质证据能否支撑权钱交易。下文分层次展开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二、深度分析：影子股东型受贿的认定框架与辩护逻辑\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（一）概念界定：何谓“干股”与“影子股东”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>根据《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》（法发〔2007〕22号）第二条，“干股是指未出资而获得的股份。国家工作人员利用职务上的便利为请托人谋取利益，收受请托人提供的干股的，以受贿论处。”这是处理此类问题的规范起点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所谓“影子股东”，是指本人未实际出资，通过配偶、近亲属、朋友或其他特定关系人代持，使工商登记不显示本人姓名，但实质上享有股权收益的人。需要特别明确的是：代持关系本身并不阻却受贿的认定。在刑事评价中，法律关系以实质为准，而非以登记外观为准。当国家工作人员利用职务便利为他人谋利，并借代持无偿取得股权收益时，代持只是实现权钱交易的载体，不能作为出罪事由。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（二）查办逻辑：穿透形式、查明实质的取证路径\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在职务犯罪调查与辩护实务中，常提及“穿透式审查”——即不被工商登记、代持协议等形式外观所束缚，而是围绕“权钱对价”这一实质收集、审查证据。其取证通常沿三条相互印证的路径展开：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，查资金闭环，证明未实际出资。若代持人名下所谓的“出资款”，实际来源于请托人，且在到账后短期内即回流至请托人控制账户，或用于请托人关联企业的循环周转，则该笔出资并未真正脱离请托人控制，足以证明国家工作人员未实际出资，所谓“持股”仅是幌子。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，查分红逻辑，印证权钱对价。正常的商业分红以公司经营业绩和持股比例为基础。若公司持续亏损或仅微利，却长期、固定向特定“股东”高额分红；或分红比例明显远超其名义持股比例，甚至设置保底回报，则这种收益背离商业常理，往往成为权钱交易的旁证，佐证所谓“分红”实为受贿对价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，查实际控制，锁定幕后主体。若名义代持人对公司的重大决策、人事安排、资金调度一问三不知，而国家工作人员在幕后实质拍板、主导经营方向，则足以穿透名义股东，锁定真正的实际控制人。实践中，国家工作人员虽不显名，但通过指示、授意行使股东权利的，亦可被认定为实际权利人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>要点提示：上述三条路径是职务犯罪调查中“穿透形式、查明实质”的取证维度，每一步结论都须以资金流水、会议纪要、通讯记录、证人证言等证据为支撑，不能仅凭怀疑或推测得出结论。对于辩护而言，同样可以沿着这三条路径反向检视证据是否扎实——例如，出资确有合法来源、分红确与业绩挂钩、决策确由代持人独立作出等，都可能成为切断权钱对价认定的切入点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（三）数额认定：两类情形的明确法律规则\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>法发〔2007〕22号第二条对受贿数额的计算作了清晰区分，这也是“影子股东”案件定罪量刑的关键：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>情形一：股份实际转让。 进行了股权转让登记，或者有相关证据证明股份发生了实际转让的，受贿数额按照转让行为时股份价值计算，所分红利按照受贿孳息处理。需要说明两点：其一，“实际转让”不仅指工商变更登记，有证据证明实质转让的亦同；其二，分红虽被定性为孳息，但依然应当依法追缴，且分红记录本身可作为认定权钱关系的证据，并非“拿了就安全”。股份价值的认定，通常以转让行为时（或双方达成转让合意时）股份的评估价值为基准，而非以案发后股价涨跌为准。干股的本质是“未出资”，故出资额本身不宜作为干股型受贿中股份价值的认定依据；真实出资场景下的对价判断，属于另一类问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>情形二：股份未实际转让。 国家工作人员并未取得真实的股权，纯粹以“股份分红”“投资回报”等名义收受利益的，实际获利数额应当认定为受贿数额。换言之，拿多少、定多少，分红总额即为受贿数额。这正是实践中大量“名为投资、实为受贿”案件的定性依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>综上，无论工商登记是否显名，只要实质是未出资而获取股权收益，且该收益对价于职务便利，即落入受贿罪的评价范围。名义上的“防火墙”，在实质证据面前往往不堪一击。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（四）出罪与降格的边界：及时退还、真实投入与纪犯之分\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在厘清认定规则后，还需明确若干可能影响性质与责任档次的边界，避免将复杂问题简单化。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1. “及时退还”的核心在于收受时有无受贿故意。 法发〔2007〕22号第九条规定，国家工作人员收受请托人财物后及时退还或者上交的，不是受贿。该项出罪规则的适用，核心在于收受时是否具有受贿故意。收受时没有受贿故意，事后主动、无条件退还或上交的，不是受贿；收受时已有受贿故意，事后退还通常只构成受贿既遂后的退赃，影响量刑而不影响定罪。“及时”与否，是对主观意图的外在检验，而非一个独立于故意判断的客观时限；实践中通常还要求组织尚未介入调查。这一点与“影子股东”场景直接相关：以“股权”“分红”形式收受的，同样适用上述规则，不存在特殊豁免。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2. 真实商业投入的辩护空间。 并非所有“未显名持股、获取收益”都构成受贿。若能够用证据证实以下情形，则可能将争议从受贿罪拉回违纪或民事范畴：其一，存在真实的技术或劳务投入，并取得了市场公允的对价；其二，存在真实的借贷出资，有完整的借款合同与还本付息记录，而非无偿配股；其三，分红与公司真实业绩严格挂钩，没有任何保底承诺或固定回报安排。上述情形的共同特征是：收益来源于真实的商业活动，而非职务便利的对价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3. 违纪与犯罪的界限不可混淆。 《中国共产党纪律处分条例》（2023年修订）第一百零三条明确禁止党员违反有关规定从事营利活动，其中包括“经商办企业”“拥有非上市公司（企业）的股份或者证券”。但需注意，“违规持股”本身属于违反廉洁纪律的行为；只有当持股的实质是权钱交易——即未出资、利用职务便利为他人谋利并借此无偿取得股权收益——才构成受贿罪。二者性质不同、评价不同，不能相互替代：真实出资且公允经营可能仅触发纪律责任，而借“持股”“分红”之名行受贿之实，则须承担刑事责任。辩护工作的重点，恰恰在于厘清二者的边界，将真正属于违纪或民事争议的部分，从刑事指控中剥离出来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三、实战案例：以“投资分红”名义收受，仍计入受贿数额\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>X某，原系四川省某市公安局党委委员、副局长。经查，其利用分管刑侦、禁毒等职务便利，接受石某某请托，以“投资分红”名义收受人民币十万元；另收受罗某某四十万元用于职务晋升运作，后因岗位调整主动退还。检察机关指控上述两项共计五十万元构成受贿。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本案中，“投资分红”型收受被纳入受贿数额认定，正对应前文所述“未实际出资、以分红名义获利直接计入受贿数额”的规则。需要说明的是，该案中“投资分红”若无真实出资与真实股权依托，实质上属于以收益名义直接输送利益，与干股型受贿中“未实际转让、以分红名义获利”的规则在评价方向上一致。同时，辩护人就四十万元“及时退还”、是否具有索贿情节等展开辩护，并提交类案检索与量刑情节量化意见。一审法院最终判处有期徒刑三年。该案例至少说明两点：其一，以“分红”“入股”为外衣的权钱输送，不能借形式外观逃避刑事评价；其二，退赃退缴、及时退还等情节，在量刑层面具有实质意义，专业辩护的空间真实存在。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>说明：上述案例为公开办案经验的梳理，用于说明法律适用与辩护逻辑，其结果不代表同类案件必然得出相同结论，亦不构成任何结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四、给当事人与家属的建议\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>切勿轻信“不显名就不构成”的误判。 工商登记、代持协议只是形式外观，监察机关围绕资金、分红、实际控制展开实质审查。指望“名字没签”规避责任，是此类案件中最常见的认知误区。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>尽早系统梳理资金与股权全貌。 出资来源、分红去向、决策记录、代持关系的来龙去脉，应逐笔厘清并固定客观证据（银行流水、协议、会议纪要等），避免关键事实随时间模糊。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>严格区分“违纪持股”与“受贿犯罪”。 对其中真实出资、实际参与经营、取得公允对价的部分，应当与权钱交易部分清晰切割，避免在案情陈述中笼统认事，导致性质被整体拔高。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>准确把握“及时退还”的合法窗口。 确属被动收受、能立即上交单位廉洁账户或退还的，应满足“无受贿故意、主动、无条件”且组织未介入的要件；一旦形成受贿故意，事后的退还通常只认定为既遂后的退赃，不影响定罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>谨慎对待“统一口径”。 家属之间串供、事后补签虚假代持协议，不仅无助于澄清事实，反而可能叠加伪证、掩饰隐瞒犯罪所得等新的法律风险，得不偿失。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>尽早委托专业刑事律师介入。 股权型职务犯罪案件证据结构复杂，专业律师可在资金穿透分析、数额核减、性质辩护与量刑协商等环节争取空间，介入越早，越能为当事人保留有利事实的认定可能。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文仅为法律知识交流与个案经验分享，不构成针对任何具体案件的法律意见或诉讼策略建议。每个案件的事实、证据与法律适用均不相同，读者如遇具体法律问题，应咨询具有相应资质的执业律师。本文所述案例结果不代表同类案件必然得出相同结论，亦不构成任何结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-20 20:32:33",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":405,"name":406,"icon":407,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":409,"description":410,"keywords":32,"canonical":411,"image":401,"jsonLd":412},"收钱只拿“分红”，也没签名字，影子股东怎么查？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","不出资、不显名，仅凭他人代持股份并获取分红，是否就能规避受贿罪？答案是否定的。所谓“影子股东”，是指未实际出资、通过亲属或他人代持持有股权并享有收益，借以掩盖权钱交易的情形。本文依据《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十五条、《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》（法发〔2007〕22号）","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F907",[413],{"@context":354,"@graph":414},[415,422],{"@type":416,"@id":411,"url":411,"headline":400,"description":410,"datePublished":417,"dateModified":418,"author":419,"publisher":420,"articleSection":406,"inLanguage":359,"image":421},"Article","2026-10-20T20:32:33+08:00","2026-10-20T16:32:21+08:00",{"@id":361},{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F20\u002Fea46a44e-3a1b-486f-82c8-5fecf02dd932.jpg",{"@type":423,"itemListElement":424},"BreadcrumbList",[425,428,430],{"@type":426,"position":6,"name":427,"item":351},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":426,"position":38,"name":406,"item":429},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":426,"position":35,"name":400,"item":411}]