[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-905":396},{"entity":4,"seo":348},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":188,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":292,"serviceTags":293,"serviceCategories":294,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":324,"homeStats":325,"serviceProducts":338},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,125,129,134,140,144,148,150,157,161,165,170,175,180],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":10,"summary":124,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},664,"王某某涉嫌非法买卖制毒物品罪、洗钱罪、出售假币罪、非法拘禁罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处理","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 非法买卖制毒物品罪 、 洗钱罪 、出售假币罪、 非法拘禁罪 结果 ：部分罪名指控不成立，法院依法作出二十年 有期徒刑 判决，并处 罚金 六千零十万元 亮点 ：成功击破犯罪集团认定标准，非法买卖制毒","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},663,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获从轻判决","案情简介 2013年至2019年，X某利用担任某县委书记的职务之便，为多人在某县承建项目、借款、退还已缴土地滞纳金等事项上提供帮助，先后十余次收受多人现金等礼品。 案发后，被告人X某于2019年8月8日主动到四川省监察委员会投案，交代了部分",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},662,"Z某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","案情简介 2015年至2017年，被调查人Z某 伙同 时任某某公司董事长、总经理L，利用L职务上的便利， 私自使用某某公司20000万元定期存款存单质押担保贷款29400万元，用于营利活动。同时涉及受贿罪、行贿罪。 辩护思路 一、Z某单独受",{"id":149,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},661,{"id":151,"title":152,"thumbnail":153,"summary":154,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},660,"H某涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fd0544967-0fd4-44ce-b977-8c6b2c0bf3e4.png","【案情简述】 H某因涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪被羁押于遂宁市公安局某区分局。 【办案过程】 针对本案的定性无异议，但是本案于一般的生产、销售有毒有害食品以及狭义的“地沟油”犯罪而言，其社会危害性极低；H某在本案中虽然为相关涉事门店的股东之一","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},659,"Z某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，未变更罪名减轻处罚","一、案情简介 z某涉嫌在其公司旗下的多家知名火锅连锁店中制造销售回油，也就是俗称”地沟油“火锅底料给食客食用，未造成人体健康损害后果。 二、辩护思路 1、刘某制作的《2019年汇总表》、《XX出库年度详表》未按照法律规定获取，与在案的其他证",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},658,"S某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（公诉机关指控）→ 非法经营罪（辩护意见） 结果：法院认定构成生产、销售伪劣产品罪，判处S某有期徒刑15年，罚金350万元。 亮点： 1. 证据链突破：成功质疑检测报告合法性，推翻",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":168,"summary":169,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},657,"涂某某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fa9d1a426-12fb-492a-a4be-f36bc5ad280e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（未遂） 结果：有期徒刑一年五个月（较检察院量刑建议降低50%），罚金五万元 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期； 2. 通过证据对抗推翻74万元销",{"id":171,"title":172,"thumbnail":173,"summary":174,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},656,"H某涉嫌生产、销售不符合安全标准食品罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F1ae54d80-b6b0-42f3-9eb4-5628548c7c21.png","一、案情简介 2020年12月，成都市某地区爆发新冠疫情，该地区的生鲜经营冻库被要求全部关停。冻库关停的通知一出，则意味着商家库房里的全部冻货，将全部无法销售，只能废弃。 部分商家为保住自己的货物，冒险继续销售冻货，其联合找到冻库房东H某，",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},655,"J某涉嫌涉嫌侵犯商业秘密罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，免于刑事处罚","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps493.jpg","一、案件罪名、结果、封面语 罪名：侵犯商业秘密罪 结果： 免于刑事处罚 封面语： 某生物科技企业机密案，J 某离职后涉嫌有偿披露信息，律师介入后从本案侦查管辖权有误、阅卷权遭侵，经营信息是否为商业秘密存争议，J 某行为未达犯罪情节严重标准，",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":185,"caseTypeName":186,"caseTypeCode":187},654,"D某侵犯公民个人信息罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fe43eb26b-6e6e-452b-ad54-ddd659fc49be.png","一、【案情简述】 2020年初，被告人D某在四川某大学读书期间，在网上申请注册（需要邮箱号、手机号、手机短信验证、姓名及身份证号等）、实名认证（本人微信、QQ扫码或人脸认证）“腾讯云网络帐号、购买和使用云服务器过程中，发现贩卖腾讯云账号（云",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",[189,192,197,200,203,208,211,217],{"id":38,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":193,"name":194,"summary":195,"keywords":196},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":156,"name":155,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":201,"keywords":202},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":204,"name":205,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":185,"code":187,"name":186,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[235],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,256,268,280],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":258,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[266],{"id":258,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":264,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":269,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":282,"city":283,"caseType":284,"title":285,"thumbnail":286,"content":10,"publishTime":287,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":288,"lawyers":289},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[290],{"id":282,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[295,300,305,310,315,320],{"id":40,"createdAt":296,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":31,"code":298,"name":299,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":301,"deleted":31,"code":302,"name":303,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":304,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":309,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":311,"deleted":31,"code":312,"name":313,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":314,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":185,"createdAt":316,"updatedAt":317,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":212,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":321,"deleted":31,"code":322,"name":323,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[326,329,332,335],{"value":327,"label":328},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":330,"label":331},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":333,"label":334},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":336,"label":337},"6","全国分所",[339,342,345],{"title":340,"desc":341},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":343,"desc":344},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":346,"desc":347},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":349,"description":13,"keywords":350,"canonical":351,"image":10,"jsonLd":352},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[353],{"@context":354,"@graph":355},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[356,362],{"@type":357,"@id":358,"url":351,"name":7,"inLanguage":359,"publisher":360},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":363,"@id":361,"name":7,"url":351,"logo":364,"image":364,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":359,"address":365,"geo":368,"department":370},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":367},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":369,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[371,376,380,384,388,392],{"@type":372,"@id":373,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":374,"parentOrganization":375},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":377,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":378,"parentOrganization":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":381,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":385,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":389,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":393,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":361},{"entity":397,"seo":408},{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":399,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":400,"thumbnail":401,"content":402,"publishTime":403,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":404},905,"2026-10-20 16:29:50","制猥亵罪和一般猥亵的区别是什么？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F20\u002F4dc2622d-9b65-48cb-b995-2d11c6194c5c.jpg","\u003Cp>强制猥亵罪与一般猥亵的核心区别，在于行为是否具备刑法意义上的“强制”属性。强制猥亵罪依据《刑法》第二百三十七条追究刑事责任，基本刑为五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役，具有聚众、在公共场所当众或者其他恶劣情节的，处五年以上有期徒刑；猥亵儿童设有独立法定刑，基本档为五年以下有期徒刑，并另设五年以上有期徒刑的加重档。而尚不够刑事处罚的猥亵行为，以及在公共场所故意裸露身体隐私部位的行为，则依据《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》（2025年修订，2026年1月1日施行）第五十二条分别作拘留、罚款处理。该条第一款规制“猥亵他人”，第二款单独规制“在公共场所故意裸露身体隐私部位”，二者是并列的两类治安违法行为，不宜统称为“一般猥亵”。可见，决定“判刑数年”还是“拘留数日”的，不是行为名称，而是手段是否压制了被害人的反抗、对象是否为不满十四周岁的儿童、情节是否达到刑事追诉标准。本文从罪名定位、“强制”的认定、量刑档位与行刑交叉四个层面作辨析，供当事人与家属理性评估行为性质与法律后果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一、核心结论：区别在“强制”二字，不在行为名称\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>直接回答：强制猥亵罪与尚不够刑事处罚的猥亵行为（本文简称“一般猥亵”，仅指由治安管理处罚法调整的猥亵行为，不含该法第五十二条第二款规定的公共场所故意裸露行为）的根本分野，在于行为是否以暴力、胁迫或者其他方法，使被害人处于不能反抗、不敢反抗或者不知反抗的状态。凡是达到这一“强制”程度的，依照《刑法》第二百三十七条追究刑事责任；仅属情节轻微、尚不够刑事处罚的猥亵，则按行政违法处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>换言之，“猥亵”是一个事实描述，而“强制猥亵”是一个法律评价。同样是抠摸、搂抱等越界行为，手段不同、对象不同、场所不同，法律后果可能从行政拘留数日横跨到五年以上有期徒刑。判断的起点，永远是行为是否压制了被害人的自由意志。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二、法定辨析路径：从罪名定位到行刑交叉\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.1 罪名与法条定位：刑事与行政的两条轨道\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【核心结论】已满十四周岁之人的性自主决定权由强制猥亵罪保护，不满十四周岁儿童的性权益由猥亵儿童罪专门保护；两者以十四周岁为年龄分界。尚不够刑事处罚的猥亵行为则归入治安处罚，不构成犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《刑法》第二百三十七条第一款规定，以暴力、胁迫或者其他方法强制猥亵他人或者侮辱妇女的，处五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役。该款的保护对象是已满十四周岁的人，且不问性别，男对男、男对女、女对男、女对女均适用。需要注意，已满十四周岁不满十八周岁的未成年人，若遭强制猥亵，适用该款而非猥亵儿童罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《刑法》第二百三十七条第三款专门规定猥亵儿童罪，保护不满十四周岁的儿童。该款在《刑法修正案（十一）》后已改为独立法定刑：基本档为五年以下有期徒刑，并另设多项加重情形适用五年以上有期徒刑。可见，十四周岁是刑事评价上的关键年龄线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对于尚不构成刑事犯罪的猥亵行为，以及公共场所故意裸露身体隐私部位的行为，由《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》（2025年修订，2026年1月1日施行）第五十二条分款调整：第一款针对猥亵他人，规定拘留处罚；第二款针对在公共场所故意裸露身体隐私部位，规定警告、罚款及情节恶劣时的拘留。这类行为通常只作拘留、罚款处理，与刑事追诉有本质不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.2 “强制”的三种情形：不能反抗、不敢反抗、不知反抗\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【核心结论】刑法理论将“强制”概括为暴力、胁迫以及其他方法，三者共同指向一个结果，即被害人陷入不能、不敢或不知反抗的状态。识别“强制”，就是识别行为是否压制了被害人的自由意志。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一种是暴力，使被害人不能反抗。典型情形如强行拖拽至僻静处实施猥亵，或以殴打、捆绑等物理强力排除被害人的反抗能力。暴力本身不限于殴打，任何足以压制反抗的有形强制均属此类。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二种是胁迫及利用优势地位，使被害人不敢反抗。胁迫既包括以当场或日后加害相威胁，也包括利用上下级、师生等权力不对等关系所形成的心理强制。权威解读指出，在职场招录、管理等环节中，利用地位优势以损害名誉、工作相威胁，足以使妇女形成心理强制的，应当认定为强制猥亵罪中的“胁迫”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三种是其他方法，使被害人不知反抗。常见如利用被害人醉酒、熟睡或者被药物麻醉等丧失或减弱意识的状态实施猥亵。刑法理论与司法实务均将此类“趁人之危”的手段归入“其他方法”，其法律评价等同于强制。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需特别提示的是，在公交车、地铁等拥挤场所，借被害人因害怕、尴尬而不敢声张之机实施猥亵，属于使被害人“不敢反抗”的情形，可以构成强制猥亵。这类行为发生在运营的公共交通工具上时，在形式上符合“在公共场所当众”的特征；但是否据此升格五年以上有期徒刑，实务中持审慎限制立场。人民法院案例库入库案例（王某炜强制猥亵案）明确：对于情节较轻的在公共场所当众猥亵，应将“公共场所当众”作为入罪因素考量，而非当然的升档量刑情节，须综合猥亵部位、持续时间、被害人年龄、危害后果及行为人有无性犯罪前科等判断。在地铁、公交上实施的情节相对轻微的“咸猪手”行为，通常判处五年以下有期徒刑，而非径行适用加重档。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.3 量刑档位之辨：从治安拘留到五年以上重刑\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【核心结论】法定刑的跨度，直观反映了“强制”程度与对象、情节的差异：治安违法的猥亵与裸露止于拘留罚款，强制猥亵基本刑五年以下，加重情形五年以上，猥亵儿童另有独立法定刑及加重档。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>强制猥亵罪的基本刑为五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役。具有聚众、在公共场所当众犯前款罪，或者有其他恶劣情节的，依照《刑法》第二百三十七条第二款，处五年以上有期徒刑。猥亵儿童罪在《刑法修正案（十一）》后已改为独立法定刑，基本档为五年以下有期徒刑，具备该条第三款规定情形之一的，处五年以上有期徒刑。不再沿用修法前“依照前两款从重处罚”的表述；其立法评价整体重于强制猥亵罪的基本档，但“从重处罚”已不是现行条文中的独立规则。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>与之相对，治安管理处罚法第五十二条项下行为的处罚明显轻缓。《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》（2025年修订，2026年1月1日施行）第五十二条规定，猥亵他人的，处五日以上十日以下拘留；猥亵精神病人、智力残疾人、不满十四周岁的人或者有其他严重情节的，处十日以上十五日以下拘留。在公共场所故意裸露身体隐私部位的，处警告或者五百元以下罚款；情节恶劣的，处五日以上十日以下拘留。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>由此可见，同为“猥亵”二字，因强制程度、对象年龄、是否当众、情节是否恶劣等变量不同，法律后果可能横跨行政处罚到五年以上有期徒刑，这正是个案中需要精细区分之处。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.4 行刑交叉：行政与刑事的界限并非截然二分\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【核心结论】行政违法与刑事犯罪之间在个案中可能存在模糊地带，存在行政拘留后转为刑事追诉、或刑事立案后经辩护作行政处罚处理的情形，关键在于强制手段是否足以认定、对象年龄与情节是否达到刑事标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实践中，部分案件起初以行政拘留结案，后因伤情鉴定、对象年龄查明或情节升级而转为刑事追诉；也有案件起初按刑事立案，后经辩护，结合行为手段、危害程度等因素，成功作行政处罚处理。这种“行刑交叉”说明，定性并非在案发一刻即固定不变，而是随证据与情节的展开而可能被重新评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>也正因为界限模糊，专业判断尤为必要。对强制手段的有无、对象是否不满十四周岁、是否当众、后果情节是否达到刑事追诉标准等问题的厘清，往往在侦查早期即应介入，以免不利定性被过早固定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三、给家属的几点建议\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>建议一：先厘清“强制”程度与对象年龄\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>家属判断行为性质，应先厘清是否使用了暴力、胁迫或者其他使被害人不能、不敢、不知反抗的手段；同时核实被害人是否不满十四周岁，因为儿童案适用猥亵儿童罪，量刑明显更重。这两个变量直接决定案件是行政违法还是刑事犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>建议二：及时固定并保全证据\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>监控录像、伤情照片、被撕扯的衣物、通讯记录、在场证人信息等，都是后续定性判断的基础。如被害人身体受损，及时就医并保留诊疗记录，既能保护身心健康，也为可能的伤情鉴定留存依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>建议三：把握程序节点，分清行政拘留与刑事追诉\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>即便尚处行政拘留阶段，也可就行为性质咨询律师；一旦转为刑事立案，公安机关拘留最长三十日加检察院审查批捕七日共三十七天，是了解案情、提出法律意见、争取有利定性的关键窗口，应尽早介入。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>建议四：促使当事人如实陈述，不顶罪也不夸大\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在强制猥亵案件中，如实供述对认定坦白、自首等从宽情节具有重要意义。应劝导当事人不替他人顶罪、不隐瞒关键事实，也不因恐慌而夸大未曾实施的行为，保持供述的稳定与完整。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>建议五：尽早委托专业刑事律师介入\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>性犯罪案件的辩护高度依赖证据审查与定性判断。律师越早介入，越能及时固定有利事实、厘清强制手段与情节轻重，为后续的撤案、不批捕、不起诉或从轻量刑争取空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四、家属常见追问\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>追问一：随手摸了一下，算强制猥亵罪吗？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>未必。是否构成犯罪，关键在于是否具备“强制”属性以及情节是否达到刑事追诉标准。偶发的、轻微的身体接触，若未压制被害人反抗，通常按《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》（2025年修订）第五十二条作拘留、罚款处理，并非当然构成刑事犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>追问二：情侣或熟人之间的越界玩笑，会构罪吗？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>强制猥亵罪以违背被害人意志为前提。若双方出于自愿，一般不构成犯罪，但可能违反公序良俗甚至承担民事责任。一旦违背一方意愿、使用强制手段，则不论双方关系亲疏，均可能构成本罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>追问三：行政拘留会留下“案底”吗？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>行政拘留属于行政处罚，不是刑事处罚，不会形成刑法意义上的“犯罪案底”。但行政拘留记录会作为违法记录在公安机关内部留存。按照《公安机关办理犯罪记录查询工作规定》，行政违法和行政处罚记录不属于犯罪记录，不记载于无犯罪记录证明之中。之所以实践中仍可能出现“被知悉”的情形，通常不是无犯罪记录证明本身记载了该记录，而是在政审、特定职业准入等审查场景中，审查机关通过其他渠道查询或要求当事人申报违法记录，与刑事案底性质不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>追问四：为什么猥亵儿童判得更重？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《刑法》第二百三十七条第三款对猥亵儿童作了专门规定，在《刑法修正案（十一）》后设有独立法定刑，基本档为五年以下有期徒刑，并设置了独立的加重档（如多人多次、当众情节恶劣、造成伤害等）。这是基于对儿童身心更易受侵害、自我保护能力更弱的特别保护，立法上予以更重评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：相关法条（全文）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百三十七条【强制猥亵、侮辱罪】【猥亵儿童罪】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>以暴力、胁迫或者其他方法强制猥亵他人或者侮辱妇女的，处五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役。聚众或者在公共场所当众犯前款罪的，或者有其他恶劣情节的，处五年以上有期徒刑。猥亵儿童的，处五年以下有期徒刑；有下列情形之一的，处五年以上有期徒刑：（一）猥亵儿童多人或者多次的；（二）聚众猥亵儿童的，或者在公共场所当众猥亵儿童，情节恶劣的；（三）造成儿童伤害或者其他严重后果的；（四）猥亵手段恶劣或者有其他恶劣情节的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑法》第十四条【故意犯罪】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>明知自己的行为会发生危害社会的结果，并且希望或者放任这种结果发生，因而构成犯罪的，是故意犯罪。故意犯罪，应当负刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》（2025年修订，2026年1月1日施行）第五十二条【猥亵他人、在公共场所故意裸露身体隐私部位】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>猥亵他人的，处五日以上十日以下拘留；猥亵精神病人、智力残疾人、不满十四周岁的人或者有其他严重情节的，处十日以上十五日以下拘留。在公共场所故意裸露身体隐私部位的，处警告或者五百元以下罚款；情节恶劣的，处五日以上十日以下拘留。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文根据公开法律条文与实务案例进行分析，旨在提供一般性法律知识参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的法律意见。刑事案件的处理高度依赖个案事实与证据状况，是否构成犯罪、属于何种罪名、是否认定加重情节，由司法机关依法认定。文中案例均已脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件结果。如遇具体案情，请咨询专业刑事律师。\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-20 19:28:34",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":405,"name":406,"icon":407,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":409,"description":410,"keywords":32,"canonical":411,"image":401,"jsonLd":412},"制猥亵罪和一般猥亵的区别是什么？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","强制猥亵罪与一般猥亵的核心区别，在于行为是否具备刑法意义上的“强制”属性。强制猥亵罪依据《刑法》第二百三十七条追究刑事责任，基本刑为五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役，具有聚众、在公共场所当众或者其他恶劣情节的，处五年以上有期徒刑；猥亵儿童设有独立法定刑，基本档为五年以下有期徒刑，并另设五年以上有期徒刑的加重档。而尚不够刑事处罚","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F905",[413],{"@context":354,"@graph":414},[415,422],{"@type":416,"@id":411,"url":411,"headline":400,"description":410,"datePublished":417,"dateModified":418,"author":419,"publisher":420,"articleSection":406,"inLanguage":359,"image":421},"Article","2026-10-20T19:28:34+08:00","2026-10-20T16:29:50+08:00",{"@id":361},{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F20\u002F4dc2622d-9b65-48cb-b995-2d11c6194c5c.jpg",{"@type":423,"itemListElement":424},"BreadcrumbList",[425,428,430],{"@type":426,"position":6,"name":427,"item":351},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":426,"position":38,"name":406,"item":429},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":426,"position":35,"name":400,"item":411}]