[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-841":396},{"entity":4,"seo":348},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":188,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":292,"serviceTags":293,"serviceCategories":294,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":324,"homeStats":325,"serviceProducts":338},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,125,129,134,140,144,148,150,157,161,165,170,175,180],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":10,"summary":124,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},664,"王某某涉嫌非法买卖制毒物品罪、洗钱罪、出售假币罪、非法拘禁罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处理","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 非法买卖制毒物品罪 、 洗钱罪 、出售假币罪、 非法拘禁罪 结果 ：部分罪名指控不成立，法院依法作出二十年 有期徒刑 判决，并处 罚金 六千零十万元 亮点 ：成功击破犯罪集团认定标准，非法买卖制毒","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},663,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获从轻判决","案情简介 2013年至2019年，X某利用担任某县委书记的职务之便，为多人在某县承建项目、借款、退还已缴土地滞纳金等事项上提供帮助，先后十余次收受多人现金等礼品。 案发后，被告人X某于2019年8月8日主动到四川省监察委员会投案，交代了部分",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},662,"Z某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","案情简介 2015年至2017年，被调查人Z某 伙同 时任某某公司董事长、总经理L，利用L职务上的便利， 私自使用某某公司20000万元定期存款存单质押担保贷款29400万元，用于营利活动。同时涉及受贿罪、行贿罪。 辩护思路 一、Z某单独受",{"id":149,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},661,{"id":151,"title":152,"thumbnail":153,"summary":154,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},660,"H某涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fd0544967-0fd4-44ce-b977-8c6b2c0bf3e4.png","【案情简述】 H某因涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪被羁押于遂宁市公安局某区分局。 【办案过程】 针对本案的定性无异议，但是本案于一般的生产、销售有毒有害食品以及狭义的“地沟油”犯罪而言，其社会危害性极低；H某在本案中虽然为相关涉事门店的股东之一","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},659,"Z某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，未变更罪名减轻处罚","一、案情简介 z某涉嫌在其公司旗下的多家知名火锅连锁店中制造销售回油，也就是俗称”地沟油“火锅底料给食客食用，未造成人体健康损害后果。 二、辩护思路 1、刘某制作的《2019年汇总表》、《XX出库年度详表》未按照法律规定获取，与在案的其他证",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},658,"S某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（公诉机关指控）→ 非法经营罪（辩护意见） 结果：法院认定构成生产、销售伪劣产品罪，判处S某有期徒刑15年，罚金350万元。 亮点： 1. 证据链突破：成功质疑检测报告合法性，推翻",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":168,"summary":169,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},657,"涂某某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fa9d1a426-12fb-492a-a4be-f36bc5ad280e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（未遂） 结果：有期徒刑一年五个月（较检察院量刑建议降低50%），罚金五万元 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期； 2. 通过证据对抗推翻74万元销",{"id":171,"title":172,"thumbnail":173,"summary":174,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},656,"H某涉嫌生产、销售不符合安全标准食品罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F1ae54d80-b6b0-42f3-9eb4-5628548c7c21.png","一、案情简介 2020年12月，成都市某地区爆发新冠疫情，该地区的生鲜经营冻库被要求全部关停。冻库关停的通知一出，则意味着商家库房里的全部冻货，将全部无法销售，只能废弃。 部分商家为保住自己的货物，冒险继续销售冻货，其联合找到冻库房东H某，",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},655,"J某涉嫌涉嫌侵犯商业秘密罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，免于刑事处罚","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps493.jpg","一、案件罪名、结果、封面语 罪名：侵犯商业秘密罪 结果： 免于刑事处罚 封面语： 某生物科技企业机密案，J 某离职后涉嫌有偿披露信息，律师介入后从本案侦查管辖权有误、阅卷权遭侵，经营信息是否为商业秘密存争议，J 某行为未达犯罪情节严重标准，",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":185,"caseTypeName":186,"caseTypeCode":187},654,"D某侵犯公民个人信息罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fe43eb26b-6e6e-452b-ad54-ddd659fc49be.png","一、【案情简述】 2020年初，被告人D某在四川某大学读书期间，在网上申请注册（需要邮箱号、手机号、手机短信验证、姓名及身份证号等）、实名认证（本人微信、QQ扫码或人脸认证）“腾讯云网络帐号、购买和使用云服务器过程中，发现贩卖腾讯云账号（云",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",[189,192,197,200,203,208,211,217],{"id":38,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":193,"name":194,"summary":195,"keywords":196},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":156,"name":155,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":201,"keywords":202},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":204,"name":205,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":185,"code":187,"name":186,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[235],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,256,268,280],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":258,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[266],{"id":258,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":264,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":269,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":282,"city":283,"caseType":284,"title":285,"thumbnail":286,"content":10,"publishTime":287,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":288,"lawyers":289},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[290],{"id":282,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[295,300,305,310,315,320],{"id":40,"createdAt":296,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":31,"code":298,"name":299,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":301,"deleted":31,"code":302,"name":303,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":304,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":309,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":311,"deleted":31,"code":312,"name":313,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":314,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":185,"createdAt":316,"updatedAt":317,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":212,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":321,"deleted":31,"code":322,"name":323,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[326,329,332,335],{"value":327,"label":328},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":330,"label":331},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":333,"label":334},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":336,"label":337},"6","全国分所",[339,342,345],{"title":340,"desc":341},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":343,"desc":344},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":346,"desc":347},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":349,"description":13,"keywords":350,"canonical":351,"image":10,"jsonLd":352},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[353],{"@context":354,"@graph":355},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[356,362],{"@type":357,"@id":358,"url":351,"name":7,"inLanguage":359,"publisher":360},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":363,"@id":361,"name":7,"url":351,"logo":364,"image":364,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":359,"address":365,"geo":368,"department":370},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":367},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":369,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[371,376,380,384,388,392],{"@type":372,"@id":373,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":374,"parentOrganization":375},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":377,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":378,"parentOrganization":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":381,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":385,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":389,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":393,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":361},{"entity":397,"seo":408},{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":399,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":400,"thumbnail":401,"content":402,"publishTime":403,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":404},841,"2026-10-15 17:58:06","昆明卓安黄婧团队 | 股东把钱转到个人账户被报案职务侵占，公司一直知情，能不能争到无罪？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F15\u002Ff5846979-ef72-44e0-b045-b7238818a9b7.jpg","\u003Cp>股东把钱转到个人账户被报案职务侵占，公司一直知情，能不能争到无罪？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【核心结论】钱转进谁的账户，只是表象。真正决定罪与非罪的，是行为人对这笔钱有没有\"非法占有的目的\"。而公司长期知情、默许，甚至主动审核放行的资金处置方式，恰恰是证明\"没有非法占有目的\"最有力的证据。这是职务侵占案件里最容易被忽略的一条无罪通道。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我做刑事辩护这些年，职务侵占是我接手最多的一类经济犯罪案件。这类案子有个很特别的地方：报案的往往不是外人，而是曾经的合作伙伴、公司股东，甚至是一起打拼过的老搭档。公司一旦翻脸，把过去几年的账一笔一笔翻出来，人就进去了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>找我的当事人，绝大多数是民营企业主、股东或者高管。他们问得最多的一句话几乎一模一样：我把钱转到了自己的账户上，可公司一直都知道啊，怎么就成职务侵占了？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这句话问到了要害。今天我就把它掰开讲清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>钱进了谁的账户，从来不是定罪的关键\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>先要把最容易搞混的一点说清楚。很多人以为，职务侵占看的是钱的去向，钱一旦进了个人账户，就等于侵占。这是一个流传很广的误解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百七十一条第一款规定的是，公司、企业或者其他单位的工作人员，利用职务上的便利，将本单位财物非法占为己有，数额较大的，构成职务侵占罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这句话里有三个要素：利用职务上的便利、本单位财物、非法占为己有。前两个是客观层面的，第三个是主观层面的。而真正决定罪与非罪的，是第三个。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">家属和当事人关注的表象\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法律实际审查的实质\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">钱是不是转到了个人账户\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">有没有利用职务上的便利\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">账面上有没有发票\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">这笔钱是不是本单位财物\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">报销手续规不规范\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>主观上有没有非法占有的目的\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司账上有没有做平账处理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">有没有挥霍、隐匿、销毁账目的行为\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\"公转私\"是客观事实，但它证明不了\"非法占有\"。账户归属只能说明钱去过哪里，说明不了钱是暂时周转、是内部结算，还是被永久揣进了自己的腰包。这两者之间，隔着的正是刑法要证明的那颗\"心\"。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>法律真正要问的，是有没有\"非法占有目的\"\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>职务侵占罪的成立，必须同时满足主观和客观两方面的要件。这不是我的个人观点，《全国法院审理金融犯罪案件工作座谈会纪要》里写得很明确：认定主观目的，应当坚持主客观相一致的原则，既要避免单纯根据损失结果客观归罪，也不能仅凭被告人自己的供述，而应当根据案件具体情况具体分析。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>落到职务侵占这一类民刑交叉的案件里，办案机关判断有没有非法占有目的，看的通常是这么几件事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查方向\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">指向有非法占有目的\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">指向没有非法占有目的\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">占有财物的动机\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">无合理事由，纯为据为己有\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">存在真实的经济纠纷、内部结算、历史惯例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">账目处理方式\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">用虚假发票平账、销毁账目、隐匿收入\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">账目完整，款项在账上可追溯\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">资金的最终去向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">用于个人挥霍、高风险投资、转移藏匿\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">用于公司经营、偿还公司债务、正常支出\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">事后的态度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">拒不归还、逃避对账、失联\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">持续沟通结算，有偿还安排并实际履行\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司的态度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司不知情，事后才发现\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cstrong>公司事前知情，长期默许，主动配合\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>这张表里最后一行，是很多案件真正的胜负手，也是最多人没抓住的一行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>\"公司知情默许\"为什么能成为无罪的关键\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我给家属讲这个道理的时候，常常直接带他们看一份判决，比讲十遍法条都管用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在深圳市罗湖区人民法院审理的一起职务侵占案件中，被告人陈某与深圳某旅游公司及其汕头分社签订合作协议，担任分社负责人。为了业务开展的方便，双方把分社的对公账户、分社总经理和被告人本人的个人账户，一并提供给客户，由客户自主选择把业务款打到哪个账户。被告人用个人账户收取业务款后，与公司不定期结算、上交。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>后来双方发生纠纷，公司报案。罗湖区人民法院审理后认为：被告人在经营过程中用个人账户收款、再与公司不定期结算上交的做法，公司是知情和默许的，双方形成了较为固定的结算和支付方式；在双方确定最终债权债务之前，被告人对收取的业务款享有持有权。最终，法院宣告被告人无罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这份判决把道理讲得很直白：\u003Cstrong>当一种资金操作方式已经成为公司和负责人之间固定、公开、双方认可的结算惯例，它就不再是\"偷偷侵占\"，而是一种双方都接受的往来方式。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 缺少了\"背着公司\"这个前提，非法占有的故意就无从谈起。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这不是孤例。这几年，从最高人民法院到地方各高院，在职务侵占罪上确认无罪的裁判，走的是同一条逻辑线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">案例\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">裁判机关与来源\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">出罪的核心逻辑\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">段某职务侵占再审改判无罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">最高人民法院发布的涉民营企业产权和企业家合法权益保护再审典型案例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处分涉案项目属于依法行使股东权的行为，既不是恶意侵占国有资产，也不是非法侵占公司资产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">麦某职务侵占、挪用资金无罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">广东省高级人民法院第九批参阅案例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">资金在两家关联公司之间流转，但没有证据证明本人具有非法占有目的\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">冉某职务侵占再审案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">广东法院服务保障民营经济高质量发展十大典型案例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">双方不存在事实雇佣关系，本人承担了经营成本，占有溢价销售款不能认定有非法占有故意\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">张某职务侵占案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">湖北省高级人民法院公布的典型案例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">家族式私营企业由夫妻共同财产设立，法定代表人有权处置公司财产，款项用于偿还公司欠款且经配偶认可，未损害公司和其他股东利益\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">王某职务侵占案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">人民法院案例库收录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">一人公司，个人财产与公司财产高度混同，无法准确区分，难以认定非法占有故意，相应金额应从犯罪数额中扣除\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>这些案件分属不同地区、不同年份，但共同点非常清楚：\u003Cstrong>当公司对资金的使用长期知情、默许，涉案财产又难以和当事人个人财产清晰切分的时候，刑法不应该轻易认定\"非法占有\"。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>同样是\"公司知情\"，结局可以完全不同\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>讲到这里，我必须提醒一句，免得有人听岔了方向。并不是只要公司\"知道\"，就一定无罪。这里有一条很细的分界线，实务中经常被人搞反。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>公司事后才知道、知道了也只是暂时隐忍没追究，这不影响犯罪成立。公司作为被害方，暂时不想把事情闹大，属于怠于维权，不能反过来变成行为人的护身符。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>真正能阻却非法占有目的的，是公司事前就知道、并且用行动认可了这种操作方式，长期这么办，已经形成稳定的经营惯例。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">情形\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">法律评价\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">对案件的影响\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司事前知情，主动审核放行，多方签字认可\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">构成事实上的许可\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">阻却非法占有目的，是有效的无罪抗辩事由\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">长期默许，形成固定的往来和结算方式\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">构成经营惯例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">支持\"不具有非法占有目的\"的判断\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司事后才知情，暂时隐忍未追究\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">属于怠于维权\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不阻却犯罪成立\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">制度上明令禁止，当事人私下绕开监管操作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">违背单位意志\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">指向非法占有目的\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>这条界线，画在\"事前许可\"和\"事后容忍\"之间。前者证明当事人心里没鬼，后者什么都证明不了。所以职务侵占案件的辩护，很多时候不是去纠缠每一笔钱花在了哪里，而是回头把公司多年来知情、认账、配合的证据一条一条找出来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2026年5月1日起，职务侵占的入罪门槛变了\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>还有一条最新变化，当事人和家属都必须知道，很多人现在还没反应过来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（二）》（法释〔2026〕6号），2026年4月10日公布，2026年5月1日起施行。它的第八条明确，职务侵占罪的定罪量刑标准，参照贪污罪执行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这意味着职务侵占罪的数额标准发生了实质变化。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">数额档次\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">旧标准（2016年解释）\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">现行标准（2026年5月1日起）\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">对应法定刑\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">数额较大\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">6万元以上\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">3万元以上\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役，并处罚金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">数额巨大\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">100万元以上\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">20万元以上\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">三年以上十年以下有期徒刑，并处罚金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">数额特别巨大\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">未明确\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">300万元以上\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">十年以上有期徒刑或者无期徒刑，并处罚金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>这里要解释一句。2016年的解释用\"倍数折算\"的办法，把职务侵占的门槛定成贪污罪的二倍和五倍，也就是6万元和100万元。2022年最高人民检察院和公安部发布的立案追诉标准，立案门槛是3万元。于是就出现了一个奇怪的落差：立案按3万元，审判按6万元。2026年新解释把两条线拉平了，职务侵占和国家工作人员的贪污罪，从此同一套数额标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对当事人的实际影响是：\u003Cstrong>过去够不上\"数额巨大\"、量刑在三年以下的涉案金额，现在可能直接跳到三年以上。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 比如涉案25万元，按旧标准还没到100万元，处在三年以下这一档；按新标准已经越过20万元，进入三年以上十年以下。量刑档次前移，对辩护策略的制定影响很大。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以现在办这类案子，第一件要核的就是涉案金额落在哪一档，用的是新标准还是行为发生时的旧标准。这两个答案不一样，辩护的空间也不一样。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三条最容易走错的路\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在做这类案件的辩护时，我看到家属和当事人最常走错的，是这么三条路。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一种，是顺着对方的逻辑，去逐笔自证钱的去向。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 控告材料往往列得很细：某年某月转出多少，某笔支出没有发票，某笔现金去向不明。看到这些，当事人第一反应是赶紧逐条解释，这笔请谁吃的饭，那笔送给了谁。这是一条走不通的路。现金往来本来就无法自证，越解释越被动，反而把讨论的焦点牢牢锁在\"钱去了哪\"，而真正能翻盘的\"公司知不知情\"被彻底晾在一边。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二种，是急着把账做平。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 有的当事人一听出事，第一反应是找人补发票、补凭证，想把过去的窟窿填上。这是非常危险的动作。事后补做凭证，一旦被查明，不但不能出罪，反而会被作为隐匿、掩盖的证据，直接坐实非法占有的目的。账目的真实状态，就是最有利的证据，不要动它。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三种，是把公司内部的历史惯例当成理所当然。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 有些当事人觉得，这么多年大家都是这么干的，老板高管都知道，这有什么好说的。问题在于，习惯归习惯，证据归证据。如果这种操作从来没有留下任何书面痕迹，没有报表，没有审批，没有业务维系费的记录，那么到了办案机关那里，\"公司知情\"就只是当事人的一句话，落不了地。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>真到了这一步，这些材料要提前准备\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果家人已经因为职务侵占被立案，或者公司已经流露出报案的意思，下面这些材料要尽早理清楚。它们指向的只有一个问题：\u003Cstrong>这套资金操作方式，公司到底知不知情。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">要证明的事实\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">对应的证据材料\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">去哪找\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司事前知情\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">相关报表、审批单、签批记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司财务、本人留存的业务资料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">长期默许\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">历年同类处理记录、业务维系费台账、报销记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">公司账套、部门台账\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">双方认可的惯例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">同事、下属、财务人员的证言\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">相关人员沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">资金用于公司经营\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">支付凭证、合同、往来记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">银行流水、业务合同\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">存在真实经济往来\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">借款、垫付、结算、分红约定的书面依据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">合作协议、股东会决议、聊天记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>这些材料不需要当事人自己去解释每一笔现金给了谁，只需要回答一个问题：这种操作，公司是不是一直知道，并且一直在配合。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>我陪当事人走过的这段路\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我自己办过的一起职务侵占案，走的正是这条路。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一位当事人被公司以涉嫌职务侵占报案，理由是他在任职期间把公司款项转入了个人账户。家属找到我的时候，最担心的是资金去向说不清楚。我们接手后，没有把力气花在逐笔解释现金支出上，而是回过头去梳理公司多年来的资金管理方式，把公司知情、默许这套操作的相关材料一条一条固定下来，形成了完整的证据链。最终，检察院以证据不足对当事人不予逮捕，案件走到最后，是不起诉结案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这类案件办下来，我最深的体会是：\u003Cstrong>职务侵占罪惩罚的是故意侵占、非法占有，它不应该为民营企业落后的、不规范的财务管理制度买单。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 股东之间闹矛盾，把过去几年粗放的账务拿出来，用刑事报案的方式解决民事纠纷，这是当事人最需要警惕、也最需要专业应对的局面。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《最高人民法院关于在审理经济纠纷案件中涉及经济犯罪嫌疑若干问题的规定》第一条就确立了原则：同一主体因不同的法律事实，分别涉及经济纠纷和经济犯罪嫌疑的，经济纠纷案件和经济犯罪嫌疑案件应当分开审理。最高人民法院在涉民营企业产权保护的多个典型案例中，反复强调的也是同一件事：准确区分罪与非罪，防止把一般违法违规行为当作刑事犯罪处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以遇到这类局面，家属和当事人要做的是冷静，是马上找有相关办案经验的律师，把公司知情默许这条线，尽早固定下来。路走对了，案子是有转机的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>家属常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>问：钱转到个人账户之后，只要补上发票，是不是就没事了？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：这个想法很危险。事后补做凭证，恰恰可能被认定为掩盖行为。真正有用的，是证明公司事前就知情、认可这种操作方式。凭证的规范与否，指向的是财务问题；公司知不知情，指向的才是罪与非罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>问：公司老板口头同意过，但没有书面记录，算不算知情？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：口头同意如果不能被证据固定，很难单独支撑\"公司知情\"的判断。要去补的是间接证据：同事和财务人员的证言、历年同类操作的记录、审批流程的痕迹、业务维系费的台账。多条证据互相印证，才能还原出\"公司一直知情\"这个事实。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>问：公司已经报案了，现在补救还来得及吗？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：来得及。立案不等于定罪，从侦查到审查起诉，每一个阶段都有空间。关键是尽早介入，把公司知情默许的材料固定下来，在审查起诉阶段提出，争取不起诉。等到审判阶段再动，被动程度会明显增加。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>问：我把钱用于公司经营了，是不是一定没事？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：不一定。资金用于公司经营，能有力支持\"没有非法占有目的\"的判断，但前提是这笔钱确实是公司财物、去向能够查证。如果账目被销毁、资金去向说不清楚，即便实际用于经营，也很难自证，风险依然存在。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>问：股东之间的经济纠纷，能不能走民事途径解决？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：可以，而且很多时候这才是正确的路径。按照相关司法解释确立的原则，不同的法律事实分别涉及经济纠纷和经济犯罪嫌疑的，应当分开处理。股东认为自己的民事权益受损，通过民事诉讼主张权利，比动用刑事报案更妥当。但如果已经被以刑事报案，就别把希望全押在\"这是民事纠纷\"上，要同步做好刑事层面的应对。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>关于黄婧主任与卓安律师事务所\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>黄婧｜卓安（昆明）律师事务所创始人、主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>组织领导黑社会性质组织罪辩护｜非法吸收公众存款与融资刑事风险｜职务侵占案件辩护｜非国家工作人员受贿案件辩护｜涉案财产查封与解封｜云南企业刑事合规体系建设\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2010 年毕业于西南政法大学，深耕刑事法律服务领域十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件 100+ 件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量）。卓安刑事合规专业委员会委员，庭立方严选律师，2026 年获评「LegalOne 西部地区法律大奖：杰出律师（刑事业务）」。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在经济犯罪与职务犯罪辩护中，她注重罪名认定与证据链条的逐笔核查，把不该由当事人承担的部分一笔一笔摘出\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-15 17:56:43",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":405,"name":406,"icon":407,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":409,"description":410,"keywords":32,"canonical":411,"image":401,"jsonLd":412},"昆明卓安黄婧团队 | 股东把钱转到个人账户被报案职务侵占，公司一直知情，能不能争到无罪？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","股东把钱转到个人账户被报案职务侵占，公司一直知情，能不能争到无罪？ 【核心结论】钱转进谁的账户，只是表象。真正决定罪与非罪的，是行为人对这笔钱有没有\"非法占有的目的\"。而公司长期知情、默许，甚至主动审核放行的资金处置方式，恰恰是证明\"没有非法占有目的\"最有力的证据。这是职务侵占案件里最容易被忽略的一条无罪通道。 我做刑","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F841",[413],{"@context":354,"@graph":414},[415,422],{"@type":416,"@id":411,"url":411,"headline":400,"description":410,"datePublished":417,"dateModified":418,"author":419,"publisher":420,"articleSection":406,"inLanguage":359,"image":421},"Article","2026-10-15T17:56:43+08:00","2026-10-15T17:58:06+08:00",{"@id":361},{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F15\u002Ff5846979-ef72-44e0-b045-b7238818a9b7.jpg",{"@type":423,"itemListElement":424},"BreadcrumbList",[425,428,430],{"@type":426,"position":6,"name":427,"item":351},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":426,"position":38,"name":406,"item":429},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":426,"position":35,"name":400,"item":411}]