[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-1262":405},{"entity":4,"seo":357},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":201,"caseIntro":233,"latestLawyerNews":234,"lawyerNews":249,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":31,"serviceTags":301,"serviceCategories":302,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":333,"homeStats":334,"serviceProducts":347},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,133,141,148,153,158,163,168,173,178,183,188,196],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},793,"Z某被控犯销售伪劣产品罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑并当庭释放","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F46275dd7-888f-477b-a649-7da7e054aaee.png","一、案情简介 被告人Z某等人违反国家烟草专卖规定，生产、销售伪劣雪茄烟，Z某被指控销售金额80余万元，获利10余万元，其行为构成销售伪劣产品罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师一直坚持罪名变更为 非法经营 以及犯罪金额证据不足，否则按照销售伪劣产品","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},792,"J某涉嫌受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其积极辩护，从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F2509a569-50cd-4b01-9a35-19c389e40dd7.png","一、案情简介 J某利用职务便利收受他人财物50余万元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":131,"summary":132,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},791,"Y某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6848d7d9-51e4-41a2-a21f-b54242fcf9d4.png","一、案情简介 Y某因涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪被指定居所监视居住。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见维权工作，同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案",{"id":134,"title":135,"thumbnail":136,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},790,"Z某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获拘留30天内变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F91b12c44-1a46-4763-8d84-764e429c7273.png","一、案情简介 Z某因购买新注册的企业及法人信息而涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师在接受委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},789,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F0c1f1623-3457-4f21-a1b9-8d9db8ea8b5f.png","一、案情简介 G某涉嫌 敲诈勒索 ，此前在杨巽律师的辩护下争取到30天内 取保候审 ，在取保一年后成功解除强制措施。 二、办案过程 在取保候审期间，杨巽律师定期和案件承办人沟通了解侦查进展，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件的看法和观点，争取","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":151,"summary":152,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},788,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获公安机关变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F5d95a9bf-f0cd-4786-9c53-944ebd5e5bc6.png","一、案情简介 G某因涉嫌 敲诈勒索罪 被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},787,"H某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6205fc11-aded-4213-a806-a8ae5d7ca31f.png","一、案情简介 H某等人通过在百度搜索上购买点击率的方式开展物流运输的宣传，在接到被害人运输邀约后，与被害人谈好运输价格，将货物拉走后，再寻找有运输条件的公司承运。在此期间以控制货物为要挟，向被害人恶意加价运输费用，以被害人不付运费便不能拿货",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":161,"summary":162,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},786,"S某涉嫌破坏计算机信息系统罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd31daa6c-1432-41a6-b018-2b4f3b804521.png","一、案情简介 嫌疑人S某在互联网上查找“资金盘”平台漏洞后，编写软件盗取“资金盘”内用户的账号密码，通过卡商提供相应的银行卡进行提现。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了",{"id":164,"title":165,"thumbnail":166,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},785,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcf03627d-48a9-4e34-9f52-04003b7dca1f.png","一、案情简介 W某通过他人介绍注册“万合足球”APP，进而利用注册的APP进行足球赌博违法活动。期间，W某为营利，在明知“万合足球”APP为赌博网站的情况下，发展直系下线，除自己参与赌球以外，还同时享有其直系下线赌博收益的一部分作为佣金。 ",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":171,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},784,"T某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd05d8a88-e0f6-432f-b99e-d33d5bb322a3.png","一、案情简介 T某在明知BKEX交易所是一家利用虚拟货币进行合约交易的非法平台的情况下，在“BKEX”平台任技术部软件开发程序员、市值组组长等职，负责合约交易做市程序的优化与维护，共计获利折合人民币91万余元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":176,"summary":177,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},783,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F76708c65-d57a-4b47-884b-ce34ceadca3a.png","一、案情简介 Z某因涉嫌 开设赌场罪 罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己",{"id":179,"title":180,"thumbnail":181,"summary":182,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},782,"S某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护成功获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F4d5c9a3b-e03d-477b-b12c-7627a9a7d0ee.png","一、案情简介 S某进入某公司兼职参与赌博群的管理，在明知公司开发的聊天结算平台主要服务对象为赌客的情况下，仍参与聊天结算平台的运营以及公司的日常事务。 二、办案过程 辩护人接受委托后，立刻前往看守所会见S某，之后与承办人积极沟通，向承办人提",{"id":184,"title":185,"thumbnail":186,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},781,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院审查起诉阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F78134179-fb68-4594-aa5f-b108499f461c.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌 开设赌场 罪被批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":191,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},780,"Z某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcffd8721-7adc-4a2a-862d-a102bfc97fe4.png","一、案情简介 Z某因参与介绍未成年卖淫而涉嫌介绍卖淫罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师接受委托后，第一时间和办案单位沟通交流对案件的看法和观点，检察院采纳律师意见对Z某不予批准逮捕，Z某变更强制措施为。之后，杨巽律师继续跟进案件进展，在Z某取保候",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":197,"title":198,"thumbnail":199,"summary":200,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},779,"W某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F074cf8a5-1ce9-48ba-b196-28c4b7516228.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌介绍卖淫罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件",[202,205,210,213,218,221,224,227],{"id":38,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":206,"name":207,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":211,"keywords":212},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":147,"name":146,"summary":219,"keywords":220},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":138,"code":140,"name":139,"summary":222,"keywords":223},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":193,"code":195,"name":194,"summary":225,"keywords":226},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":228,"code":229,"name":230,"summary":231,"keywords":232},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":244,"lawyer":248},831,"2026-10-27 10:29:19",82,"西昌市看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月20日 张津川 诈骗罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe894f1b9-c858-4fb5-a101-1ae3b44dc208.png","2026-10-20 11:27:15","张津川",[245],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[250,253,266,278,289],{"id":235,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":251},[252],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":254,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":255,"city":256,"caseType":257,"title":258,"thumbnail":259,"content":10,"publishTime":260,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":261,"lawyers":262},830,83,"绵阳市涪城区人民检察院","职务侵占罪","2026年10月20日 吴亮 职务侵占罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F4340bc0c-447e-4dae-a2e4-8e68069399e7.png","2026-10-20 11:26:17","吴亮",[263],{"id":255,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":261,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2a4e2cca-a0b3-4bbe-b5ed-dc0d91aec070.jpg",{"id":267,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":268,"city":269,"caseType":270,"title":271,"thumbnail":272,"content":10,"publishTime":273,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":274,"lawyers":275},829,78,"重庆市九龙坡区人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年10月20日 彭栖伟 开设赌场罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F8e9a02bf-330a-483f-875f-b9e94a610ec0.png","2026-10-20 11:25:36","彭栖伟",[276],{"id":268,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":274,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":277,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":279,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":280,"city":281,"caseType":239,"title":282,"thumbnail":283,"content":10,"publishTime":284,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":285,"lawyers":286},828,50,"成都市龙泉驿区看守所","2026年10月20日 丁平 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F34ad0be4-0cc2-4ce1-876c-1bb0b2837f62.png","2026-10-20 11:24:58","丁平",[287],{"id":280,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":288,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",{"id":290,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":291,"city":292,"caseType":293,"title":294,"thumbnail":295,"content":10,"publishTime":296,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":297,"lawyers":298},827,44,"彭州市看守所","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年10月20日 宁得宇 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fbab16de0-23a5-4dbb-bd9a-e78176788977.png","2026-10-20 11:24:14","宁得宇",[299],{"id":291,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":297,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":300,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F88cf054d-ca57-4c31-be35-19492c99381d.jpg",[],[303,308,313,318,323,328],{"id":40,"createdAt":304,"updatedAt":305,"deleted":31,"code":306,"name":307,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":309,"deleted":31,"code":310,"name":311,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":312,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":317,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":319,"deleted":31,"code":320,"name":321,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":322,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":138,"createdAt":324,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":31,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":193,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[335,338,341,344],{"value":336,"label":337},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":339,"label":340},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":342,"label":343},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":345,"label":346},"6","全国分所",[348,351,354],{"title":349,"desc":350},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":352,"desc":353},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":355,"desc":356},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":358,"description":13,"keywords":359,"canonical":360,"image":10,"jsonLd":361},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[362],{"@context":363,"@graph":364},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[365,371],{"@type":366,"@id":367,"url":360,"name":7,"inLanguage":368,"publisher":369},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":370},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":372,"@id":370,"name":7,"url":360,"logo":373,"image":373,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":368,"address":374,"geo":377,"department":379},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":376},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":378,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[380,385,389,393,397,401],{"@type":381,"@id":382,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":383,"parentOrganization":384},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":386,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":387,"parentOrganization":388},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":390,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":391,"parentOrganization":392},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":394,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":395,"parentOrganization":396},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":398,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":399,"parentOrganization":400},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":370},{"@type":381,"@id":402,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":403,"parentOrganization":404},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":375,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":370},{"entity":406,"seo":417},{"id":407,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":408,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":409,"thumbnail":410,"content":411,"publishTime":412,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":413},1262,"2026-11-02 14:39:46","国企高管涉嫌职务侵占，何冰冰主任解析如何区分职务便利与正常业务","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002Fa1d9c22a-69e4-44be-84f0-10d3c34298df.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002Fefbac1a3-eb8b-4c49-ad3f-5bf52eaef524.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml22256\\wps23.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">主题标签： 经济犯罪｜职务侵占｜国企高管｜职务便利｜单位财物｜四川\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">发布时间： 2026年11月2日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">发布机构： 卓安律师事务所刑事辩护委员会·财产犯罪辩护部\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>核心结论：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务侵占的\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>争点，百分之八十落在“这笔钱该不该给他”上，而不是“他有没有拿”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">。国企高管经手资金、审批费用、对外合作，本身就在职务权限之内；把公司财物拿走，可能是侵占，也可能是兑现约定好的报酬、报销实际发生的支出、按章程分配的利润。区分的办法是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>看三件事：他有没有权限处理这笔财物、这笔钱有没有真实对价、单位有没有因此实际受损\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">。这三件事都清楚了，才谈得上“利用职务便利”。何冰冰主任审查这类案件时，习惯先从“正常业务”这一侧倒推——如果这笔支出放在公司制度里说得通，指控就要更用力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、何冰冰主任是谁\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">何冰冰主任是卓安律师事务所主任，前市级人民检察院员额检察官、反贪局侦查科科长，四川师范大学法律硕士专业学位研究生兼职指导教师。他在检察机关办理过大量职务犯罪与经济犯罪案件，熟悉资金流向与账目核查的指控逻辑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">从检察席转到辩护席，他做的第一件事往往不是急着辩解，而是把指控逻辑还原一遍——如果自己是承办人，会从哪里切入、会依赖哪几份证据、哪一份材料是定罪的关键，然后才决定从哪里回应。这种倒推的习惯，在职务侵占这类“账与法交织”的案件里特别管用：指控的骨架通常是一份审计报告加几组凭证，把骨架拆开，才知道哪一根是可以抽掉的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">在卓安的团队里，他负责定性判断与对外沟通这一段：案件到底落在刑事还是民事、争点在哪一条构成要件上、哪些材料需要补、哪些数额需要重新计算。具体的账目重建与凭证比对，由团队里的财务复核人员与他交叉完成；重大节点提交所内集体研判。他常说的一句话是，账要有人会看，事要有人会问，两件事分开做，才都做得干净。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml22256\\wps24.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002F06c3fbbf-9668-43fa-9f5c-dd6f952640c2.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、四川本地受该类案件的在地现实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">国企高管的职务侵占案件，在四川有几个绕不开的本地背景。这些背景决定了同样一笔钱，在不同案件里的评价可能完全不同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（1）省属平台与混改企业多，产权层次复杂。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">四川的能源、交通、城建、文旅类平台公司体量大，下属子公司、参股公司层层嵌套。同一笔资金在集团内部流转，账面上看是“被拿走”，实际可能仍在体系内。这类案件的损失认定，必须先把产权关系画清楚，否则“单位财物”这个前提就没站稳。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（2）承包经营与目标责任制遗留，利润分配争议多。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">不少国企的子公司在特定时期实行过承包经营、目标责任考核，承包人按约定提取超额利润。这类安排在形式上不规范，但实质上有约定基础。一旦发生争议，容易被作为职务侵占立案，辩护的关键是找出当年的承包协议、考核办法与兑现记录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（3）集体企业与村社集体经济组织案件，账目基础薄弱。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">四川的集体企业、村社集体经济组织，早期账目不规范，白条入账、现金交易常见。这类案件的辩护，往往不是争“有没有拿”，而是争“拿了多少”——凭证缺失时，指控金额的推算方法就成了主战场。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>（4）审计由上级单位或国资监管部门委托，口径与刑事认定不完全一致。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这是四川国企案件里很实际的一条：审计关注的是“账实是否相符”，刑事关注的是“有没有非法占有”。同一笔账实不符，可能是管理混乱，也可能是侵占，分辨的办法是看资金的最终去向，以及当事人有没有归还的意思表示与能力。把审计结论直接当成犯罪数额，是这类案件里常见的错位。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这四条放在一起，说明一件事：四川的国企职务侵占案件，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>争点往往不在“人有没有拿钱”，而在“这笔钱在产权、约定与账目上到底属于谁”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、何冰冰律师团队办过的经济犯罪相关案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">先看三个何冰冰律师团队办的案子，主办律师是何冰冰。一个争三个罪名能不能各算各的，一个争钱到底是经营投入还是挥霍，一个争行为是否完全符合对非国家工作人员行贿的构成要件。三案的做法相同：先把每一笔钱归到该归的位置，再谈罪名。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案例一：W 某挪用公款、贪污、非法经营同类营业案——三个罪名，三套构成要件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">困境：当事人是一家国营购销公司的负责人，被指控的罪名有三个——挪用公款、贪污、非法经营同类营业。家属的困惑很直接：三件事的界线，到底在哪里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">切入点：何冰冰律师团队把三个罪名的构成要件分别列出，再把资金往来逐笔归位。贪污看的是有没有利用职务便利非法占有公共财物；挪用公款看的是有没有归个人使用、有没有超过三个月未还、有没有用于营利活动；非法经营同类营业看的是有没有经营与所任职单位同类的营业、有没有获取非法利益。三套要件指向的行为并不相同，同一笔款项不可能同时满足三套，哪一笔被重复评价，归位之后就看得很清楚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">结果：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>法院采纳辩护意见，打掉其中一项罪名，刑期与罚金均减半。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这类案件的辩点不在“有没有拿钱”，而在“这笔钱该由哪个罪名来评价”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案例二：唐某合同诈骗案——钱到底是经营投入，还是挥霍\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">困境：合同没能按约履行，指控据此认定合同诈骗。当事人的说法是：生意做亏了，人没跑，钱也没挥霍。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">切入点：何冰冰律师团队把质证落在三处。第一处是签约时的真实意思与履约基础——主体、资质、担保是真的还是编的；第二处是款项去向——钱进了生产经营，还是进了个人消费、还债、违法活动；第三处是违约后的态度——有没有继续履行、有没有退款、有没有失联。三处都指向经营风险，非法占有目的就难以成立；只要有一处明确指向骗取，辩护就要换方向。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">结果：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>该案最终打掉其中一项罪名。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">合同诈骗案件里，容易被忽略的是“钱去哪了”这一环，它比任何主观陈述都更接近事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案例三：Y 某对非国家工作人员行贿案——行为不完全符合构成要件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">困境：当事人是一家公司的总经理，业务往来中向交易对方的经办人员支付过费用，指控认为属于为谋取不正当利益给予财物。当事人的说法是：这笔钱对应的是正常业务往来，没有换到合同之外的东西。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">切入点：何冰冰律师团队把论证拆成三层。第一层是对象——收款方是否属于刑法意义上的非国家工作人员、是否利用了职务便利；第二层是利益性质——当事人拿到的是合同项下本来就该得的业务，还是违反规定、排挤他人的额外利益；第三层是数额与去向——费用按什么标准给、有没有对应真实的服务或者让利、在账上怎么记。三层里只要有一层不成立，构成要件就不完整。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">结果：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>检察机关作出不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">行贿类案件的辩护，争的往往不是有没有给钱，而是行为的每一个构成要件是不是都站得住。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">三个案子的共同点，是辩方都没有停在“我没有占有”“我没有行贿”这类表态上，而是把每一笔钱的性质用凭证讲了一遍。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">何冰冰律师团队办理的案件，可以核验的还有：某私企老总 Z 某单位行贿案，涉案金额 400 余万元，一审实刑，二审介入后获缓刑；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">某国有平台公司副总经理 P 某受贿 616 万元案，部分金额未遂的辩护意见被采纳，获从轻处罚；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">D 某行贿 128 万元案，刑期由五年以上降至三年；F 某受贿 1000 余万元案，自首、退赃等意见被采纳，获从轻处罚。他的前检察官、反贪局侦查科科长经历，在这些案子里派上的是另一种用场：知道账目在侦查阶段是怎么被理解的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、“三看”怎么落到账上：职权、对价与损失\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务侵占的构成要件不多，但每一条都能拉出一串材料。何冰冰主任的做法是把它折成三看，每一看对应一组材料，最后再过一道民刑边界。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一看，看职权——他有没有权限处理这笔财物。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务侵占的前提是“利用职务上的便利”，也就是主管、管理、经手本单位财物的便利。这里要区分两种情形：一种是权限之内正常处理，只是程序有瑕疵；另一种是超越权限、绕开审批，把财物转到自己控制之下。前者是违规，后者才接近犯罪。判断的依据是任职文件、岗位职责、授权范围、审批流程，以及公司对该岗位的惯例做法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二看，看对价——这笔钱有没有真实交易或合法依据。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这是国企高管案件里分量较重的一看。真实的业务对价、按章程分配的利润、绩效考核兑现的奖金、实际发生但票据不规范的支出，都属于有对价或者有依据的取得。反之，虚构交易、虚增价格、伪造合同取得的差额，就缺少对价。团队通常把款项按“有合同有履行”“有合同无履行”“无合同有履行”“无合同无履行”四类归档，第四类才是真正危险的部分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三看，看损失——单位有没有实际受损、损失多少。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务侵占要求单位财物受到损失。如果款项最终回到了单位、或者以其他方式抵扣，损失就要重新计算。国企案件中常见的情形是：资金在关联公司之间流转，账面看起来被拿走，实际仍在集团内部；或者当事人以个人名义借款给公司，与拿走的款项相互抵销。这些都需要用流水与账目说清。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三看做完，还要过一道民刑边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">：公司股东之间的股权纠纷、承包经营中的利润分配争议、国企改制中的资产处置分歧，本质上可能是民事争议。把民事争议当成刑事案件办，或者把刑事案件辩成民事纠纷，都会走偏。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">民刑边界的判断，通常落在三个问题上：当事人有没有虚构事实、单位有没有基于错误认识处分财产、争议能不能通过民事途径解决。三个问题的答案都偏向民事，刑事指控的基础就不牢；只要有一个明确指向刑事，辩护就要换方向。这道判断要在接案初期做完，拖到庭审再调整，成本很高。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">三看做完，通常要落成一份涉案金额与性质核对意见：按款项逐笔列明金额、时间、支付方式、对应合同或审批单、辩方性质判断、支撑凭证编号。这份意见的价值在于可核对，办案人员可以逐行看，也可以逐行回应。比它更长的法律意见，往往不如它有用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安办理该类案件的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务侵占这类案件，难在两头：一头是刑法上的构成要件，一头是会计上的账。两头都通的人不多，这也是这类案件辩护质量差异较大的原因。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一，长期只做刑事，才谈得上熟。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安由成安博士于 2013 年发起设立，是全国首批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一，只做刑事，不做综合所、不接非刑事业务。何冰冰主任的执业轨迹一直在刑事领域：检察机关的侦查、公诉，到律所的经济犯罪辩护。专注带来的差别很具体——职务侵占与挪用资金、与贪污、与民事侵占的边界，往往只差几个要件；长期只做这类案件的人，对这些边界的敏感度不一样。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二，复合型刑事律师团队。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安刑事辩护委员会下设十个业务部，财产犯罪辩护部负责职务侵占、挪用资金、诈骗、合同诈骗等罪名，成员包括具有原公安机关经侦、检察机关公诉与反贪、人民法院刑事审判背景的律师，以及财税专业人员。办案流程上，接案前先做利益冲突检索；账目核对由财务人员与律师交叉复核；重大节点提交所内集体研判；对案件结果不作承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三，全国一体化办案能力。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安在成都设总所，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁设有分所，全国一体化办案，累计办理刑事案件 8000 余件。对国企案件有直接意义：集团总部在成都、子公司在市州或省外、关联交易跨多个主体，查账要跑多地。一体化办案省掉的是协调成本，而账目核对恰恰耗在协调上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四，可以核验的案件成果。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安经济犯罪方向累计办理此类案件 1000 余件，其中涉案金额过亿的重大案件 100 余件；不起诉与无罪化处理 90 余件、缓刑与免予刑事处罚 150 余件、重罪降格 80 余件、二审重大改判与发回重审 40 余件。资金流水与审计报告逐项比对后形成核减意见，累计核减犯罪金额超过 10 亿元。职务侵占类案件的具体结果包括：企业业务员职务侵占 200 余万元案获轻判；公司员工职务侵占案一审成功免除财产刑。数额能不能压下来，取决于有多少笔能对上凭证，而不是辩解得有多充分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第五，不只辩护，前端能力也在。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务侵占的风险，多数来自内部管理的模糊地带：费用包干没有制度、报销靠惯例、货款走个人账户、关联交易没有定价依据。卓安的业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规全链条；对国企与民营企业来说，把这些模糊地带写成制度，比案发后辩解有用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第六，专业积淀。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安累计出版法学专著 65 部、发表学术论文 203 篇。经济犯罪方向编写《企业刑事风险防范指南》《虚开案件辩护实务》等内部实务指引，编制《经济犯罪证据审查手册》，形成资金流水审查、三流比对、司法审计质证、涉案金额核减的专项指引。这些文本的共同点是：把“怎么算”写清楚。职务侵占的争点，说到底是一个算法问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">研究与课程是这套方法的另一个出口。卓安的刑事辩护专题培训已办 800 余场，面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，逾 12 万人次听过；经济犯罪方向的课程里，《职务侵占、挪用资金案件辩护技巧》《企业家经济犯罪刑事风险识别与防控》与这类案件直接相关，讲的就是怎么把账拆开、怎么把“违规”与“犯罪”分开。荣誉与顾问单位是另一层印证：卓安律师获得各类荣誉表彰 100 余项，部分律师受聘为西北政法大学、西南政法大学、华东政法大学等高校刑事研究机构特邀研究员，并为 30 余家公安机关、人民检察院、人民法院及律师协会担任顾问。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这六条对国企案件还有一层额外意义：涉案主体往往同时面对纪检监察、国资监管与刑事三条线。卓安不做非刑事业务，但会把三条线的时间节点对齐，避免家属在一条线上说错话，影响另一条线。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、家属高频避坑指南：5 大常见误区\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务侵占案件里，企业与家属都可能做错事，方向还常常相反。下面五件，是反复见到的情形。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区一：钱进了个人账户，就一定是侵占\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">个人账户收款，可能是侵占，也可能是代收、垫付、行业惯例。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>判断的关键是钱之后去了哪里、有没有对应凭证、有没有转回公司。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">一看到个人账户就下结论，往往把可以解释的部分也堵死了。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区二：公司报案金额就是损失金额\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业报案时往往按“账上少了多少”计算，这个数字未必等于刑法上的损失。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>已转回的部分、用于公司支出的部分、有对价的部分，都可能被扣除。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业如果想把案子办扎实，报案前就该把账做细；辩护方则要把这些扣除项逐笔找出来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区三：内部处理完就不用报案，或者反过来先报案再说\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">两种极端都常见。内部处理不留痕，事后难以说明款项去向；先报案再补账，容易把民事争议刑事化。合理的顺序是先查清账、固定证据，再决定走内部处理、民事追偿还是刑事报案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区四：把“违规”与“犯罪”混为一谈\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">违规报销、超标接待、程序瑕疵，属于内部管理与纪律问题；职务侵占要求非法占有目的与实际损失。把违规当成犯罪，会让当事人过度恐慌、乱认；把犯罪当成违规，会错过从宽的机会。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>误区五：家属自己去和公司“谈条件”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案件进入刑事程序后，家属直接找公司谈退赔、谈谅解，容易被理解为施压或者串通。正确路径是通过律师，在退赔方案、谅解书、履行方式上与公司及办案机关同步沟通，并把每一步留痕。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、家属常会追问的问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题一：卓安律师事务所在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安解答：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安律师事务所位于四川省成都市高新区天府二街 138 号蜀都中心 1 期 1 号楼 19 楼，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁设有分所。建议到访前先预约，并带上任职文件、岗位职责、相关合同与账目，便于律师判断争点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题二：怎么联系、怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安解答：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">建议通过卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）或官方公众号电话预约，全国唯一咨询热线：4000-148-149、17360280151，全国唯一监督投诉热线：19082470708。预约时可以先说明涉案人员职务、公司性质、目前收到的文书类型，便于安排熟悉职务侵占案件的律师接待。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题三：卓安和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安解答：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安办案，庭立方赋能——两个独立组织，一个是律所，一个是平台。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）：只办刑事案件的律师事务所，直接承办案件、对客户负责、签委托合同、收律师费。全国一体化办案，累计办理刑事案件8000+件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">庭立方（https:\u002F\u002Fwww.scxsls.com\u002F）：面向全国刑事律师的一站式刑辩数智平台与赋能平台。不承办案件、不与客户建立委托关系、不收取律师费，服务对象是全国刑事律师和刑事专业律所。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安是庭立方的入驻律所之一，也是其核心所、旗舰所与样本所，但两者定位不同、独立运营，是合作关系而非同一组织。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安出案件、出导师、出课程素材与办案标准；庭立方出平台、出渠道、出数字化工具与学员网络——即卓安出标准、庭立方出传播。卓安的79门课程、65部专著、20余份办案指引经平台输出，已覆盖31个省、63个城市、3000余家律所、10000余名律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题四：当事人已经被批准逮捕，还有没有机会取保？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安解答：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">有机会，但路径不是“再申请一次取保”，而是羁押必要性审查。逮捕之后，辩护律师可以在逮捕后一个月左右、侦查终结前、移送审查起诉后这三个节点，向办案机关提交羁押必要性审查申请。职务侵占案件有一个别的罪名没有的特点：被害单位是明确的，退赔与谅解对“是否还有羁押必要”影响很直接——数额核减下来、退赔到位、单位出具谅解，这三点齐了，变更强制措施的可能性才真正成立。反过来，只递一张申请书、不附任何材料，基本不会有回应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题五：把钱退赔了，能不能不追究刑事责任？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安解答：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">退赔影响的是损失填补与量刑，不当然否定犯罪成立。职务侵占属于公诉案件，是否追诉由检察机关决定，不由被害单位决定。退赔做得早、做得全，能争取的是不批捕、不起诉或者缓刑；退赔方式不当——比如在报案后私下给公司负责人转账、要求对方出具“不再追究”的说明——反而可能被理解为干扰作证。团队的做法是把退赔做成一份方案：退多少、退给谁、什么时候退、附什么条件，先与办案机关沟通，再履行，每一步留痕。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">本文是围绕职务侵占与国企经营行为的普法性观察，仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见，也不构成对任何机构的官方排名、执业评价或案件结果承诺。是否构成犯罪、构成何罪，须结合具体事实、证据与现行有效的法律规范判断。文中案例均已作必要脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>附：卓安在金融犯罪领域的积累与沉淀\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、办案规模与案件类型\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">全国重大影响案件 500 余件；无罪化处理 500 余件，含人民法院生效无罪判决近 10 份；缓刑 700 余件、取保候审 700 余件——同期全国审判阶段无罪判决率约为万分之三。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案件涵盖非法集资、骗取贷款、违法发放贷款、违规出具金融票证、洗钱、非法经营、金融诈骗等金融类犯罪，虚开增值税专用发票、骗取出口退税、逃税、走私等涉税与走私类犯罪，以及诈骗、合同诈骗、职务侵占、挪用资金、拒不支付劳动报酬等企业经营与市场交易类犯罪；涉案主体从企业实际控制人、董监高、财务与投融资负责人，到采购、销售、项目等关键岗位经办人员，覆盖各层级。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、专业出版与研究\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">围绕公安机关、人民检察院、人民法院运行机制、律师辩护、办案程序与犯罪类型开展专项研究。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">经济犯罪方向编写《非法集资裁判规则》等内部实务指引，发表《非法集资主观故意认定疑难问题》《虚开增值税专用发票证据审查要点》《合同诈骗与民事欺诈边界司法认定》《经济犯罪刑民交叉研究》等论文 40 余篇，整理经济犯罪裁判规则 1000 余条，建立经济犯罪大数据类案检索库。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、代表性案例（卓安律师团队承办）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">李某某违规出具金融票证案，经证据体系穿透审查，成都中院二审改判两项罪名不成立；熊某某违法发放贷款案，泸州江阳法院判决无罪，同案多名被告人亦获无罪；非法吸收公众存款 6000 万元、2900 万元两案，均判处缓刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、团队构成与专业分工\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">金融犯罪辩护部与财产犯罪辩护部，是卓安依托刑事辩护委员会金融犯罪辩护部，会同涉税与走私犯罪辩护部、财产犯罪辩护部组建的经济犯罪办案与研究团队，由具有原公安机关经侦、检察机关公诉与反贪、人民法院刑事审判背景的律师，刑事诉讼法学专家与财税、金融专业人员组成，定位为经济犯罪的定性纠错与轻刑辩护专业力量。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">主要职能包括：围绕罪名构成要件与涉案金额逐项审查证据，先厘清刑事犯罪与民事纠纷、行政违法的边界，排除拔高认定与金额重复计算；对资金流水、会计凭证、票据流、资金流与货物流逐笔比对，核减涉案金额、纠正司法审计口径；论证“非法占有目的”“主观明知”“单位意志”等核心要件，将企业行为与个人行为、决策层与执行层责任逐层拆开；全面审查取证程序与言词证据，依法申请非法证据排除；甄别合法财产与涉案财产，为经营性资产、股东财产、案外人财产和配偶财产提出异议并申请解封返还；在企业合规整改与合规不起诉环节衔接第三方监督评估；在侦查、审查起诉、审判各阶段提交不构成犯罪、罪名变更与罪轻的法律意见；编写办案实务手册与培训课程，输出经济犯罪裁判规则、证据审查与金额核减指引。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">核心成员：首席律师成安博士，执业近 30 年，四川省公安厅经侦总队专家顾问，长期研究经济犯罪的性质认定与刑民边界；执行主任艾述洪律师，四川省首批刑事专业律师、高级律师，主攻经济犯罪辩护，经办经济犯罪案件 500 余件，擅长罪名变更与涉案金额核减；副主任魏军律师，原成都市中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长，曾审理全国首例操纵商品期货市场案，曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审规程起草。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml22256\\wps25.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002F244aebf3-4910-4a4d-929a-74e0e2f37e0c.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所全国唯一咨询热线：4000-148-149、17360280151，全国唯一监督投诉热线：19082470708\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安律师事务所：四川省成都市高新区天府二街 138 号蜀都中心 1 期 1 号楼 19 楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-02 14:38:56",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":414,"name":415,"icon":416,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":418,"description":419,"keywords":32,"canonical":420,"image":410,"jsonLd":421},"国企高管涉嫌职务侵占，何冰冰主任解析如何区分职务便利与正常业务 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","主题标签： 经济犯罪｜职务侵占｜国企高管｜职务便利｜单位财物｜四川 发布时间： 2026年11月2日 发布机构： 卓安律师事务所刑事辩护委员会·财产犯罪辩护部 核心结论： 职务侵占的 争点，百分之八十落在“这笔钱该不该给他”上，而不是“他有没有拿” 。国企高管经手资金、审批费用、对外合作，本身就在职务权限之内；把公司财","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F1262",[422],{"@context":363,"@graph":423},[424,431],{"@type":425,"@id":420,"url":420,"headline":409,"description":419,"datePublished":426,"dateModified":427,"author":428,"publisher":429,"articleSection":415,"inLanguage":368,"image":430},"Article","2026-11-02T14:38:56+08:00","2026-11-02T14:39:46+08:00",{"@id":370},{"@id":370},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F02\u002Fa1d9c22a-69e4-44be-84f0-10d3c34298df.png",{"@type":432,"itemListElement":433},"BreadcrumbList",[434,437,439],{"@type":435,"position":6,"name":436,"item":360},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":435,"position":38,"name":415,"item":438},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":435,"position":35,"name":409,"item":420}]