[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-family_guide-1460":416},{"entity":4,"seo":368},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":199,"caseIntro":228,"latestLawyerNews":229,"lawyerNews":244,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":311,"serviceTags":312,"serviceCategories":313,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":344,"homeStats":345,"serviceProducts":358},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,138,142,147,152,156,161,167,172,177,185,189,195],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},883,"陈某敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师为其辩护，数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fc5d22dff-0601-424e-9410-d6556844ab31.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪 结果：数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元，量刑显著减轻 亮点： 成功争取自首、未遂、初犯等从轻情节认定 精准区分犯罪情节轻微性，避免加重处罚 全面论证适用 缓刑 必要性（法院未",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":129,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},882,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪案,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，检察院做不起诉决定。","案情简介 H公司为被告人Z某的丈夫G某创办，主营服务器出租服务和服务器重启、服务器重装、处理服务器操作系统层面问题等服务。 2021年4月至2022年底，H公司为“天天中彩（手机购彩）”赌博网站提供部分服务器并使用Z某及其母亲Y某的银行卡收",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},881,"Z某涉嫌串通投标罪,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，成功取保候审","【案情简述】 2018年前后，Z某作为某建筑工程有限公司的员工，在涉案业务中负责协助完成招投标中标书的制作、联系其他投标公司等具体工作，通过“打招呼”等方式串通投标。对接业务过程中，在收取业主方费用后再支付给投标公司，赚取两项费用的差价。 ","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":139,"title":140,"thumbnail":10,"summary":141,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},880,"P某涉嫌销售伪劣产品案，石大海律师为其成功辩护，减少刑期18个月","一、案情简介 2021年3月至2022年6月期间，P某以鸭肉干冒充牛肉干通过淘宝店铺对外销售。P某负责淘宝店铺的仓库租赁、原料采购、经营推广、盈利管理，另请他人帮忙打包发货、负责客服。 2022年7月，公安机关现场查获P某打包假冒牛肉干的窝",{"id":143,"title":144,"thumbnail":145,"summary":146,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},879,"W某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，卓安律师事务所石大海、陈庆山律师为其辩护，由一年实刑变更为不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F9710800f-13b3-433c-96d6-26340bdc3451.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果：不起诉 亮点： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪； 犯罪未遂 与犯罪预备；事实不清；检察院采纳律师意见 封面语： W某进入跑分团伙为上游 电信诈骗 集团进行银行取现，涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},878,"Ｍ某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps497.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：检察院采纳辩护人意见，给出适用缓刑的量刑建议，当事人在被逮捕9７天后顺利取保候审。 亮点 ：从犯认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点： 被告人是否为组织者；犯",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},877,"Z某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师竭尽全力，成功为当事人争取从轻处罚","【案件详情】 2024年1月，被告人Z偶然结识了C和大Z，三人通过“飞机”软件和微信“成都卡牌对接群”与昵称为“桃子”“木森Mr”“财源滚滚”“U商”等人取得联系，在“桃子”联系好提供银行账户的卡农人员后，C带人在现场对接卡农取现，并由C检",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},876,"赵某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获得从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fb5cfbaef-5cf4-43b5-b315-f431a4326635.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：法院采纳部分辩护意见，对被告人从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。 亮点 ： 从犯 认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点 ：被告人是否为组织者；犯罪既遂金额认定",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},875,"Y某某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师经过不懈努力，不予逮捕（取保候审）","一、案情简介 Y 某某因涉嫌寻衅滋事而被依法拘留，彼时公安已将案件报捕，局势紧迫，当务之急乃是全力以赴争取检察院不予批准逮捕，为 Y 某某争取更为有利的法律处境。 二、办案过程 在 2024 年 9 月 18 日，秦敏律师用专业精神与高度责","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},874,"L某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获不予批准逮捕的良好结果。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F4be4d806-fab9-42da-bf7f-b0cfda868642.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 违法发放贷款罪 结果： 不批准逮捕 亮点： 银行事业部副总经理L某的行为不构成本罪；检察院采纳律师不予批准逮捕的法律意见。 焦点： 投资业务与贷款业务区分；是否符合违法发放贷款罪的构成要件。 封面语",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},873,"L某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获得不起诉结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fe92011b9-64b7-47dd-9efa-0b058d66cb28.png","案例罪名： 合同诈骗罪 案情简介： 2024年，L某因涉嫌合同诈骗罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，L某作为A有限公司法定代表人，在参与XX平台营销服务活动期间，指使公司员工通过控制多个账号进行虚假交易（刷单），骗取平台优惠补贴共计120余万元。",{"id":178,"title":179,"thumbnail":180,"summary":181,"caseTypeId":182,"caseTypeName":183,"caseTypeCode":184},872,"H某涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，取得公安机关对H某终止侦查，解除取保候审的良好结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F26392a98-fd04-419e-bb1e-846648713b0f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：故意伤害罪 结果：终止侦查、解除取保候审 亮点：伤情成因鉴定、检察院立案监督 焦点：故意伤害致人轻伤、补充鉴定 封面语：H某因故意伤害致Z某轻伤被某区公安分局立案侦查，并采取取保候审的强制措施。四川卓",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":10,"summary":188,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},871,"陈某某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获不起诉结果。","案例罪名： 串通投标罪 案情简介： 2024年，陈某某因涉嫌串通投标罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，陈某某作为w公司法定代表人，在参与“J省某系统”项目期间，存在安排其他公司陪标、事先与招标单位沟通技术参数等行为。陈某某于2024年4月4日被监",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":79,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},870,"F某涉嫌盗窃罪，四川卓安律师事务所母华强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","案情简介 2024年6月4日，F某与通过聊天软件认识的W某开房约会。次日早上，F某将W某放在宾馆电视柜上的黄金手镯拿走，并发送W某的照片进行威胁。6月5日，F某某被刑事拘留。6月16日， 卓安律师 事务所接受F某亲属委托，母华强律师前往看守","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":196,"title":197,"thumbnail":10,"summary":198,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},869,"Z某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,吕灵兮律师经过不懈努力，减少指控事实。","案情简介 公诉 机关指控Z某： 参加黑社会性质组织罪： 2005年至2011年期间，Z某、T某等人进入Z某1控制下的H建设，部分组织成员为组织利益实施多起违法犯罪。 寻衅滋事罪：2011年12月1日20时许，被告人Z某2得知W某在H建设承建",[200,205,208,211,216,219,222,225],{"id":41,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":166,"name":165,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":137,"name":136,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":212,"name":213,"summary":214,"keywords":215},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":194,"name":193,"summary":217,"keywords":218},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":129,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":220,"keywords":221},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":223,"keywords":224},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":182,"code":184,"name":183,"summary":226,"keywords":227},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":230,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":239,"lawyer":243},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[240],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[245,248,267,280,293],{"id":230,"createdAt":231,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":246},[247],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":249,"createdAt":237,"updatedAt":237,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":250,"city":251,"caseType":252,"title":253,"thumbnail":254,"content":10,"publishTime":255,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":256,"lawyers":257},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[258,261,266],{"id":250,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":259,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":260,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":262,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":268,"createdAt":269,"updatedAt":269,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":282,"updatedAt":282,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":283,"city":284,"caseType":285,"title":286,"thumbnail":287,"content":10,"publishTime":288,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":289,"lawyers":290},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[291],{"id":283,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":292,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":294,"createdAt":295,"updatedAt":295,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":296,"city":297,"caseType":298,"title":299,"thumbnail":300,"content":10,"publishTime":301,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":302,"lawyers":303},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[304,307],{"id":296,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":305,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":308,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[314,319,324,329,334,339],{"id":43,"createdAt":315,"updatedAt":316,"deleted":34,"code":317,"name":318,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":323,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":34,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":328,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":34,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":333,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":129,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":34,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":122,"createdAt":340,"updatedAt":341,"deleted":34,"code":342,"name":343,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[346,349,352,355],{"value":347,"label":348},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":350,"label":351},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":353,"label":354},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":356,"label":357},"6","全国分所",[359,362,365],{"title":360,"desc":361},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":363,"desc":364},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":366,"desc":367},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":369,"description":13,"keywords":370,"canonical":371,"image":10,"jsonLd":372},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[373],{"@context":374,"@graph":375},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[376,382],{"@type":377,"@id":378,"url":371,"name":7,"inLanguage":379,"publisher":380},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":383,"@id":381,"name":7,"url":371,"logo":384,"image":384,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":379,"address":385,"geo":388,"department":390},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":387},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":389,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[391,396,400,404,408,412],{"@type":392,"@id":393,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":397,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":401,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":405,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":409,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":413,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":381},{"entity":417,"seo":428},{"id":418,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":419,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":79,"title":420,"thumbnail":421,"content":422,"publishTime":423,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":424},1460,"2026-11-11 11:41:06","我在昆明涉嫌行贿罪被批捕怎么办？卓安黄婧律师解析","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F11\u002F287ca944-0fee-4872-8c03-63a72bf60146.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F11\u002F7c64b41c-1be4-41da-9a8b-3103de0b6148.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml12368\\wps29.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">主题标签： 职务犯罪｜行贿罪｜监察留置｜批准逮捕｜羁押必要性审查｜医药反腐｜昆明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">发布时间： 2026年11月11日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">发布机构： 卓安（昆明）律师事务所刑事辩护委员会·职务犯罪辩护部\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">核心结论：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">行贿案件里，批捕之后再想取保，难度比大多数人以为的要大。卓安（昆明）律师事务所黄婧律师办理的一起案件，当事人是云南瑞丽一家药企的负责人，因涉嫌行贿罪被监察机关留置六个月，案件移送审查起诉后又被批准逮捕。涉案金额巨大，且被指控向多名国家工作人员多次行贿，属于法定从重情形，量刑区间在三年以上十年以下。家属自己申请过几次取保，都没有推动。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">黄婧律师介入后，没有反复强调认罪与退缴，而是先弄清办案机关究竟在担心什么。症结是数名受贿人尚未到案，一旦当事人脱离羁押，存在串供、干扰证言的可能。她把工作重心放在跟进人员到案进度上，等风险条件发生变化，再向检察机关提交羁押必要性审查申请，围绕继续羁押是否仍有必要展开论证。当事人最终在留置六个月、看守所羁押两个月之后被依法取保候审。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">本文结合这起案件，理清三个问题：行贿罪批捕之后，法律上还有没有通道；为什么认罪退赃推不动案件；羁押必要性审查到底审查什么。争点不在态度好不好，而在那句关着还有没有必要的判断能不能被推翻。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、行贿罪留置六个月又批捕：这个案子难在哪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案件发生在医药领域腐败问题集中整治的背景下。当事人经营药企多年，业务覆盖瑞丽及周边地区，被指控在药品与耗材进入医疗机构的过程中，向多名国家工作人员送钱。监察机关对其采取留置措施，留置期满六个月后移送检察机关审查起诉，检察机关随即作出逮捕决定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">行贿罪的量刑，按《刑法》第三百九十条分三档：一般情形处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役，并处罚金；因行贿谋取不正当利益，情节严重的，或者使国家利益遭受重大损失的，处五年以上十年以下有期徒刑，并处罚金；情节特别严重的，或者使国家利益遭受特别重大损失的，处十年以上有期徒刑或者无期徒刑，并处罚金或者没收财产。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">从重情形写在同一条里。《刑法修正案（十二）》进一步明确，多次行贿或者向多人行贿、在食品药品与医疗等领域行贿并实施违法犯罪活动的，从重处罚。本案被指控向多名国家工作人员多次行贿，又落在医药领域，两个从重情形叠加，量刑预期落在三年以上十年以下这一档，家属拿到的口头预期基本都在五年上下。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">留置六个月这个时长本身也说明问题。按《监察法》的规定，留置期限一般为三个月，特殊情况下可以延长一次，延长时间不得超过三个月。用满六个月，通常意味着涉案事实多、涉及人员广、核查周期长。案件移送后检察机关又作出逮捕决定，说明在审查逮捕时，办案机关认为存在社会危险性。这两个信号叠在一起，家属的感受是：路已经走到尽头了。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">但逮捕不等于终局。逮捕解决的是强制措施问题，定罪量刑要经过审查起诉与审判。强制措施是可以变更的，变更的通道写在《刑事诉讼法》第九十五条：犯罪嫌疑人、被告人被逮捕后，人民检察院仍应当对羁押的必要性进行审查，对不需要继续羁押的，应当建议予以释放或者变更强制措施。这条通道不常用，但它存在。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、为什么认罪退赃这条路推不动\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">家属在找到律师之前，通常已经做过三件事：让当事人认罪、筹钱退缴、反复递交取保申请。这三件事都不算错，问题在于它们回答的不是办案机关此刻的问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">认罪认罚的空间，在审查起诉阶段已经进入计算。检察机关提出量刑建议时，会把认罪认罚、退缴、配合调查这些情节一并折进去。也就是说，家属再强调一遍态度好，不会让这个计算结果发生变化。它影响的是最终量刑的轻重，不是当下要不要继续羁押。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">退缴的性质也需要分清。行贿案件里，行贿款本身是实施犯罪的支出，退缴体现的是悔罪态度，不是把不该拿的钱还回去。全额退缴是有分量的从宽情节，但它不能消除串供风险。办案机关担心的是这个人出去以后会不会联系还没到案的受贿人，与钱退没退干净是两件事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">家庭困难与企业经营压力，同样不是法定理由。企业负责人被羁押，企业停摆、员工失业、家庭失去收入，这些情况在实务中很常见，检察官也理解，但《刑事诉讼法》第六十七条列举的取保条件里没有这一项。反复陈述困难，容易让沟通停在情绪层面，进入不了法律层面。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">更关键的一层是行贿案件的结构。行贿与受贿是对合关系，一笔钱有两端。受贿人还没有全部到案时，行贿人的供述就是指控其他人的重要证据，此时放人，办案机关面对的是一个具体而现实的风险：他会联系那些人吗，会说好口径吗。这个风险不消除，任何关于态度与困难的论证都很难奏效。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、卓安黄婧律师的路径：把风险是否还在变成可验证的事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">接受委托后，卓安黄婧律师做的第一件事是去检察院，与承办检察官当面沟通。她没有先递一份模板化的申请书。走流程的材料谁都会写，写了也只是进卷。她要问清的是三件事：当事人为什么被继续羁押，办案机关担心什么，哪些事实变化会影响这个判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">沟通之后，症结清晰了。真正的障碍不是涉案金额大，也不是态度不好，而是数名受贿相关人员尚未到案。在这些人到案之前，串供风险是客观存在的，办案机关不敢放，也不愿意放。这个判断一旦确立，工作重心就变了：不是论证当事人多配合，而是跟进这些人的到案进度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这一步需要耐心。卓安黄婧律师的做法是建立一份到案台账，把每一名相关人员的到案时间、供述情况、证据固定程度逐项记录，与承办检察官保持阶段性沟通。她不曾在条件未成熟时反复提交申请，因为重复的申请会消耗办案机关的注意力，等到真正该提的时候，反而没人认真看。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">等到相关人员陆续到案，原有风险开始松动，她才把材料递上去。这份意见的核心不是求情，而是一组可以核对的事实：哪些人已经到案、证言是否已经取到、书证是否已经调取、当事人在这种情况下还有没有可串通的对象。事实摆清楚之后，继续羁押的必要性这个判断，才有了被重新讨论的基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">与此同时，另一条线在同步推进。当事人已经全额退缴涉案款项，认罪悔罪，配合调查，这些情节本身不能直接换来取保，但它们构成风险降低之后的承接条件：人放出来，有退缴作保证，有认罪态度作约束，有固定住所与企业作依托。两条线合起来，才是一份完整的羁押必要性论证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、羁押必要性审查的四个支点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">按《人民检察院办理羁押必要性审查案件规定（试行）》，检察机关审查羁押必要性，要看案件事实与证据的变化、犯罪嫌疑人的人身危险性、案件情节与量刑预期、以及有无其他影响羁押必要性的情形。落到本案，卓安黄婧律师把它拆成四个支点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第一个支点是证据是否已经固定。行贿案件的核心证据是行贿人供述、受贿人证言、资金流向与业务凭证。受贿人陆续到案、证言取到、书证调齐之后，证据结构基本稳定，当事人出去以后即便翻供，也不足以动摇指控。这一点是四个支点里分量较重的一个，因为它直接对应办案机关的核心顾虑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第二个支点是串供的现实可能性。抽象地说没有社会危险性，没有意义。要具体回答：还有哪些人没到案、这些人跟当事人是什么关系、当事人有没有他们的联系方式、羁押期间有没有违规传递信息的记录。卓安黄婧律师把这些逐项写清楚，能排除的排除，不能完全排除的如实说明并给出替代方案，比如由家属与律师共同监督、联系方式变更报告义务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第三个支点是刑罚预期与羁押期限的比例。本案量刑区间在三年以上十年以下，当事人在留置与羁押中已经失去自由八个月。这个时长不短，如果案件后续还有补充侦查、延长审查起诉期限、开庭排期，实际羁押时间还会往上走。把时间账算出来，继续羁押的相当性才有讨论空间。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第四个支点是保障条件。保证人是谁、有没有固定住所、保证金能不能缴、企业在当事人不在期间由谁托管、随传随到怎么保证、住址与联系方式变化如何报告。这些内容看起来琐碎，实际是检察官决定放人时一定会问的问题。卓安黄婧律师把这些做成一份清单，连同保证人材料一并提交，让办案机关看到可控。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安案例结果：留置六个月、羁押两个月后取保候审\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">检察机关最终采纳了辩护意见，依法对当事人变更强制措施，办理取保候审。此时当事人已经在留置中度过六个月，在看守所羁押两个月，前后失去自由八个月。走出看守所那天，家属在外面等了整整一个下午。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这个结果的分量，要放在批捕之后这个前提上看。批捕意味着检察机关已经对社会危险性作出过一次肯定判断，要在同一个案件里推翻这个判断，靠的不是材料写得多漂亮，而是新事实。本案的新事实就是相关人员到案、证据固定、串供风险消除。没有这个变化，再漂亮的申请书也只是重复。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">还有一层必须说清楚：取保候审是强制措施变更，不是案件终结。它不意味着不起诉，不意味着无罪，也不意味着后面一定判缓刑。当事人仍要遵守取保候审期间的规定，未经批准不离开所居住的市、县，住址与联系方式变化及时报告，随传随到，不干扰证人作证。案件的实体辩护，从取保这一天起才真正开始。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安黄婧律师在告知结果时，把后续要做的事一并交代了：涉案金额还要逐笔核对，行贿与不正当利益的对应关系还要梳理，从重情形能不能减少一项还要争，量刑建议还有协商空间。取保只是把人从羁押状态里拿出来，让他能够参与自己的辩护，不是终点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安黄婧律师复盘四个动作：这套打法能不能复制\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第一个动作是先问为什么关着，再想怎么放出来。多数取保申请失败，不是因为理由不够多，而是因为理由不对位。办案机关关人的理由是A，申请书写的是B，写得再长也没用。卓安黄婧律师的做法是把羁押理由当成一道题先解出来，再针对这道题作答。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第二个动作是把变量做成时间表。羁押必要性不是一个静态判断，它随案件进展变化。人员到案、证据固定、退缴完成、病情变化，每一个变量都会改变结论。把这些变量列成时间表，标注当前状态与预期节点，才知道什么时候该递材料。这也是她不主张反复申请的原因：申请的价值在于时点，不在于数量。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第三个动作是书面意见与当面沟通并行。书面意见是给卷宗看的，当面沟通是给人看的。前者要严谨，每一条结论后面挂材料；后者要直接，三句话说清现在风险变了、变成什么样、为什么可以放。两者缺一，效果都会打折。卓安黄婧律师的习惯是先沟通、再提交，让承办人在读材料之前已经知道这份材料要说什么。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第四个动作是把取保之后的辩护提前设计。取保不是辩出来的终点，而是实体辩护的起点。人在里面，很多材料调不动、很多情况核不清；人出来之后，银行流水可以自己调，业务合同可以自己找，涉案金额的核减才有条件做。卓安黄婧律师在申请取保的同时，就把后续的数额核对清单交给了家属。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、卓安黄婧律师在职务犯罪上的优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这起案件用到的判断与动作，背后是一位律师十余年的积累。把它拆开看，卓安黄婧律师的优势在六个地方。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>优势一：她是卓安（昆明）律师事务所的创始人、主任，只做刑事。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（昆明）律师事务所定位一心一意做好刑事法律服务，以捍卫生命自由为使命，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规与普法培训，不做民商事，也不做综合法律顾问。卓安黄婧律师2010年毕业于西南政法大学，执业以来一直在刑事领域，这个选择决定了她的第一反应是构成要件与证据，而不是先谈和解、先谈关系。职务犯罪横跨监察程序与刑事程序，两套程序的规则不一样，留置的期限与延长、移送的节点、强制措施的变更条件、涉案财物的处置，每一步都有各自的时间窗口。只做刑事的律师会把这些节点当成本能。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>优势二：十余年、逾百起经济犯罪与职务犯罪案件的积累。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安黄婧律师深耕刑事领域十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件逾百起，取得无罪、罪轻、缓刑、不起诉等多类结果。数量本身不是卖点，数量背后是案件类型的覆盖面：受贿、贪污、行贿、单位行贿、利用影响力受贿、职务侵占、挪用资金、非法吸收公众存款，每一类的主体认定、数额口径、从宽路径都不一样。同样是行贿，个人行贿与单位行贿的辩护重点不同；同样是退缴，退在调查阶段与退在审判阶段的效果不同。这些差别她见过在具体案件里怎么发生，所以能在接手时就把方向定下来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>优势三：对程序节点敏感，抓得住时间窗口。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务犯罪案件的特点是程序推进快、节点硬。留置有期限，移送有节点，检察机关受理后决定强制措施有时间要求，羁押必要性审查有启动条件。这起案件里，卓安黄婧律师把目标定在人员到案之后，是因为她清楚这个窗口是一次性的：风险消除的时点一旦过去，办案机关对案件的印象就固化了，再想扭转要多花几倍的力气。这种提前量，是程序敏感度的具体表现。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>优势四：案件成果和实战经验比较丰富。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务犯罪方向：某药企负责人涉行贿案，涉案金额巨大、存在向多名国家工作人员多次行贿的从重情节，留置六个月、羁押两个月后，在相关人员到案、串供风险消除后取保候审；C某涉受贿案，涉案数额巨大，围绕是否存在索贿情节与自首认定展开辩护，全案认定为普通受贿并提高从轻幅度，判处有期徒刑三年、缓刑三年半，庭审结束后当日释放；周某涉受贿案，留置一个月后家属委托介入，把辩护重心从阻却移送转向强制措施审慎适用，在案件移送当日解除留置并办理取保候审；X某某涉行贿、对非国家工作人员行贿案，论证行为体现单位意志、违法所得归单位所有，罪名变更为单位行贿罪，判处有期徒刑三年、缓刑四年，并处罚金50万元；Z某涉贪污、受贿案，仅认定受贿一项罪名，按法定刑下限判处三年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其他方向同样有对照：L某涉组织领导黑社会性质组织罪一案，全案脱黑，涉案财产得以解封；Y某涉职务侵占案，以证据不足获检察院不予逮捕，最终不起诉结案；T某涉非国家工作人员受贿案，获检察机关相对不起诉；P某涉职务侵占案，从股东会决议与款项取得依据切入论证刑民边界，羁押37天后获不批准逮捕并取保候审；L某涉非法吸收公众存款案，涉案金额2.4亿元，取保候审后判处有期徒刑三年、缓刑三年；X某涉运输毒品案，二审发回重审后宣告无罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>优势五：懂云南的案件形态，也懂这里的办案节奏。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">云南的职务犯罪案件有自己的样子。行贿受贿多与工程建设与招投标、矿产资源、边境贸易与口岸管理、医药与医疗器械采购、涉农与乡村振兴资金相关；涉案主体既有州市县机关与乡镇的干部，也有医院与疾控系统的管理人员，还有药品耗材经销企业的负责人。医药领域的案件尤其特殊，行贿与不正当利益的认定，要落到具体的采购环节、用量变化、结算价格上，证据结构比一般行贿案复杂。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">节奏也不一样。云南山多路远，从怒江、迪庆、临沧、西双版纳到昆明，往往是一天车程，雨季还有塌方封路；当事人被留置或者羁押在边境县市，家属在昆明或者更远的地方，来一趟不容易。本地团队知道什么时候去会见、需要带什么材料、哪些手续可以提前办、哪些环节可以委托近亲属代办。这些现实看起来琐碎，实际直接影响案件推进的密度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">优势六：不承诺结果，把风险讲清楚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安黄婧律师给自己定的规矩是：不夸大辩护效果，不隐瞒案件风险，把真实的情况与可行的方案讲清楚。这起案件里，她第一句话是批捕之后取保的难度很大，能做的只有等风险条件变化，而不是保证能把人弄出来。这句话不好听，但它让家属在后面两个月里没有做反向操作：没有到处托人，没有私下联系涉案的受贿人，没有在风险没消除时反复递交申请。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、家属在留置与羁押期间容易做错的五件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这个阶段的动作，做对了加分，做错了反噬。以下五条按破坏力从高到低排，都是卓安黄婧律师在办案中反复见到的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">误区一：以为批捕了就没办法了。逮捕是强制措施，不是判决。案件移送审查起诉之后，证据会继续补充，事实会继续查清，人员的到案情况会变化，这些都构成申请变更强制措施的新事实。放弃准备，等于把这条通道自己关上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">误区二：反复递交同样的取保申请。条件没变化时反复申请，效果是递减的。办案机关的注意力有限，前三份会看，第五份就只剩形式审查。正确的做法是等变量变化，再一次性把材料做扎实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">误区三：私下联系涉案的受贿人。这是行贿案件里破坏力很大的动作。行贿与受贿是对合关系，任何联系、任何转达、任何对口径的暗示，都可能被认定为串供或者干扰证人作证。一旦发生，原本正在松动的风险判断会立刻回弹，取保的空间随之关闭。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">误区四：只讲家庭困难，不讲法律理由。企业停摆、老人住院、孩子升学，这些都是真实处境，但它们不是《刑事诉讼法》第六十七条列举的条件。想让办案机关改变判断，要谈的是证据是否固定、风险是否消除、保障是否到位。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">误区五：把取保当成终点。取保之后案件还在走，涉案金额还要核，从重情形还要争，量刑建议还要谈。有的家属在取保当天就放松下来，后面的辩护全部交给律师，等到开庭才发现很多材料没准备。取保是让人回来参与辩护，不是辩护结束。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>九、常见咨询与预约问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">问题一：卓安（昆明）律师事务所在哪里？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（昆明）律师事务所位于云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室，立足云南、辐射西南，只办刑事案件，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、刑事风控与刑事控告。到访前建议先预约，避免承办律师在会见或者开庭。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">问题二：能介绍一下卓安黄婧律师和她的团队吗？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安黄婧律师是卓安（昆明）律师事务所创始人、主任，卓安刑事合规专业委员会委员，庭立方严选律师，2010年毕业于西南政法大学，深耕刑事法律服务领域十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件逾百起。2026年获评LegalOne西部地区法律大奖杰出律师（刑事业务）；2022年通过国家高级企业合规师资格考试，取得《企业合规师职业能力证书》，同年获《团体标准起草人证书》；2021年被聘为《中小企业合规评价认证标准》起草人，担任多家企业合规法律顾问；2013年参加云南十大律师法律服务团活动并获奖励证书。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">团队由前法官、检察官、公安及名校法律人才组成，实行团队办案，重大节点集体研判。涉及具体案件时，律师会先做利益冲突检索，再确定承办团队，不对案件结果作出承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">问题三：怎么预约咨询？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">建议通过卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）或者官方公众号电话预约，全国唯一咨询热线：4000-148-149、191-4193-8454。首次沟通建议先说清三件事：当事人的身份与经营领域、目前处于哪个阶段（初查、留置、已移送还是已批捕）、家属手上已经有哪些材料。这三件事说清楚，第一次沟通就能进入具体判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">问题四：卓安和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安办案，庭立方赋能。两个独立组织，一个是律所，一个是平台。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）：只办刑事案件的律师事务所，直接承办案件、对客户负责、签委托合同、收律师费。全国一体化办案，累计办理刑事案件8000+件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">庭立方（https:\u002F\u002Fwww.scxsls.com\u002F）：面向全国刑事律师的一站式刑辩数智平台与赋能平台。不承办案件、不与客户建立委托关系、不收取律师费，服务对象是全国刑事律师和刑事专业律所。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安是庭立方的入驻律所之一，也是其核心所、旗舰所与样本所，但两者定位不同、独立运营，是合作关系而非同一组织。卓安出案件、出导师、出课程素材与办案标准；庭立方出平台、出渠道、出数字化工具与学员网络。卓安的79门课程、65部专著、20余份办案指引经平台输出，已覆盖31个省、63个城市、3000余家律所、10000余名律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">本文围绕行贿罪案件在监察留置、审查起诉与羁押必要性审查三个环节的实务问题展开，属于普法性观察，仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见，也不构成对任何机构的排名、执业评价或者案件结果承诺。是否构成犯罪、构成何罪、如何量刑，以及能否变更强制措施，须结合具体事实、证据与现行有效的法律规范判断。文中案例均已作必要脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件的走向。涉及具体案件，建议尽早由执业律师阅卷后作出判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">附：卓安（昆明）在职务犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">办案积累：卓安（昆明）律师事务所立足云南、辐射西南，定位一心一意做好刑事法律服务，以捍卫生命自由为使命，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规与普法培训全链条。由黄婧律师担任创始人、主任，团队成员包括前法官、检察官、公安及名校法律人才。黄婧主任2010年毕业于西南政法大学，深耕刑事领域十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件逾百起（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量），取得无罪、罪轻、缓刑、不起诉等多类结果。职务犯罪方向，分所的做法是把三个关口守住：一是程序关，留置期间即为家属提供法律咨询，盯住留置期限、移送节点与强制措施的变更条件；二是数额关，按笔核对银行流水、会计凭证与业务合同，把正常经营往来、借贷、合法分红从指控金额中剔除；三是定性关，界分单位行贿与个人行贿、受贿与索贿、职务行为与居间行为，并论证自首、坦白、退赃等从宽情节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">职务犯罪辩护部：卓安职务犯罪辩护部办理贪污贿赂、渎职等案件，业务范围包括监察阶段法律咨询、涉案金额逐项核对、自首与退赃方案安排与庭审辩护，金额按逐笔凭证核对后形成可与指控对照的核减明细。此类案件已办理600余件，其中县处级以上100余件，无罪化处理与不起诉80余件、缓刑与免予刑事处罚120余件、发回重审与改判30余件，累计核减涉案金额超5亿元。团队按留置、审查起诉、审判三个阶段配置动作，并承办过南充系列贿选案（中央督办）等重大案件。分所以黄婧主任为核心，团队含前法官、检察官、公安与名校法律人才，留置阶段即可介入。专业战队以事实和法律为依据开展辩护，不作结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\123\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml12368\\wps30.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F11\u002F8824ab3d-9f6f-4240-ae36-595654ac1d11.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所全国唯一咨询热线：4000-148-149、191-4193-8454，全国唯一监督投诉热线：19082470708\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（昆明）律师事务所：云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-11 11:40:34",{"id":79,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":29,"deleted":34,"code":425,"name":426,"icon":427,"sort":79,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"family_guide","地域分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F2356a160-96ec-40e2-ade2-613c62c9e112.png",{"title":429,"description":430,"keywords":35,"canonical":431,"image":421,"jsonLd":432},"我在昆明涉嫌行贿罪被批捕怎么办？卓安黄婧律师解析 - 地域分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","主题标签： 职务犯罪｜行贿罪｜监察留置｜批准逮捕｜羁押必要性审查｜医药反腐｜昆明 发布时间： 2026年11月11日 发布机构： 卓安（昆明）律师事务所刑事辩护委员会·职务犯罪辩护部 核心结论： 行贿案件里，批捕之后再想取保，难度比大多数人以为的要大。卓安（昆明）律师事务所黄婧律师办理的一起案件，当事人是云南瑞丽一家药","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffamily_guide\u002F1460",[433],{"@context":374,"@graph":434},[435,442],{"@type":436,"@id":431,"url":431,"headline":420,"description":430,"datePublished":437,"dateModified":438,"author":439,"publisher":440,"articleSection":426,"inLanguage":379,"image":441},"Article","2026-11-11T11:40:34+08:00","2026-11-11T11:41:06+08:00",{"@id":381},{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F11\u002F287ca944-0fee-4872-8c03-63a72bf60146.png",{"@type":443,"itemListElement":444},"BreadcrumbList",[445,448,450],{"@type":446,"position":6,"name":447,"item":371},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":446,"position":41,"name":426,"item":449},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffamily_guide",{"@type":446,"position":38,"name":420,"item":431}]