[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-938":396},{"entity":4,"seo":348},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":188,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":292,"serviceTags":293,"serviceCategories":294,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":324,"homeStats":325,"serviceProducts":338},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,125,129,134,140,144,148,150,157,161,165,170,175,180],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},668,"X某涉嫌贪污罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fb40331c5-0aeb-4e4d-bce7-3e6dee0fe939.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪 结果：被告人X某（原医保局审核股股长）被判处有期徒刑三年六个月，罚金二十万元。 亮点： 1. 成功将被告人定性为 从犯 ，减轻处罚 2. 排除部分涉案金额（证言中的两笔资金未被认定） 3. 全","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":10,"summary":124,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},667,"周某某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功核减犯罪数额并获从宽量刑","一、案件受贿罪结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪、受贿罪 结果：数罪并罚判处有期徒刑18年，罚金530万元（起诉指控贪污7099.5482万元，辩护后法院采纳部分意见核减数额）。 亮点： 1. 成功论证部分阶段不构成贪污罪主体资格，核减",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},666,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、受贿罪、巨额财产来源不明罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","律师工作： 阅卷阅卷，不停的阅卷 案件焦点： 案件程序问题：本案监委是否有管辖职权； 犯罪数额计算，这些数字对不对 案件结果： 做到了每个罪名的法定最低档量刑了 1.犯 贪污罪 ，判处 有期徒刑 一年，并处十 罚金 万元; 2.犯 受贿罪 ",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},665,"陈某涉嫌贪污罪二审改判一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，刑期由13年改判为11年","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F3afa7596-457f-43b0-93e2-8c05f101c723.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：贪污罪（二审改判） 结果：刑期由13年改判为11年，罚金100万元维持 亮点： 成功挑战贪污罪定性争议，推动法院对\"公共财产\"性质进行专项审查 通过精细化数额计算辩护，核减指控金额达76%（1353万",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":10,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":138,"caseTypeCode":139},664,"王某某涉嫌非法买卖制毒物品罪、洗钱罪、出售假币罪、非法拘禁罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处理","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 非法买卖制毒物品罪 、 洗钱罪 、出售假币罪、 非法拘禁罪 结果 ：部分罪名指控不成立，法院依法作出二十年 有期徒刑 判决，并处 罚金 六千零十万元 亮点 ：成功击破犯罪集团认定标准，非法买卖制毒","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},663,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获从轻判决","案情简介 2013年至2019年，X某利用担任某县委书记的职务之便，为多人在某县承建项目、借款、退还已缴土地滞纳金等事项上提供帮助，先后十余次收受多人现金等礼品。 案发后，被告人X某于2019年8月8日主动到四川省监察委员会投案，交代了部分",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},662,"Z某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款等罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","案情简介 2015年至2017年，被调查人Z某 伙同 时任某某公司董事长、总经理L，利用L职务上的便利， 私自使用某某公司20000万元定期存款存单质押担保贷款29400万元，用于营利活动。同时涉及受贿罪、行贿罪。 辩护思路 一、Z某单独受",{"id":149,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},661,{"id":151,"title":152,"thumbnail":153,"summary":154,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},660,"H某涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fd0544967-0fd4-44ce-b977-8c6b2c0bf3e4.png","【案情简述】 H某因涉嫌生产销售有毒有害食品罪被羁押于遂宁市公安局某区分局。 【办案过程】 针对本案的定性无异议，但是本案于一般的生产、销售有毒有害食品以及狭义的“地沟油”犯罪而言，其社会危害性极低；H某在本案中虽然为相关涉事门店的股东之一","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},659,"Z某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，未变更罪名减轻处罚","一、案情简介 z某涉嫌在其公司旗下的多家知名火锅连锁店中制造销售回油，也就是俗称”地沟油“火锅底料给食客食用，未造成人体健康损害后果。 二、辩护思路 1、刘某制作的《2019年汇总表》、《XX出库年度详表》未按照法律规定获取，与在案的其他证",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},658,"S某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获减轻处罚","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（公诉机关指控）→ 非法经营罪（辩护意见） 结果：法院认定构成生产、销售伪劣产品罪，判处S某有期徒刑15年，罚金350万元。 亮点： 1. 证据链突破：成功质疑检测报告合法性，推翻",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":168,"summary":169,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},657,"涂某某涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fa9d1a426-12fb-492a-a4be-f36bc5ad280e.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：生产、销售伪劣产品罪（未遂） 结果：有期徒刑一年五个月（较检察院量刑建议降低50%），罚金五万元 亮点： 1. 成功将指控罪名从\"既遂\"辩护为\"未遂\"，显著降低刑期； 2. 通过证据对抗推翻74万元销",{"id":171,"title":172,"thumbnail":173,"summary":174,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},656,"H某涉嫌生产、销售不符合安全标准食品罪，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002F1ae54d80-b6b0-42f3-9eb4-5628548c7c21.png","一、案情简介 2020年12月，成都市某地区爆发新冠疫情，该地区的生鲜经营冻库被要求全部关停。冻库关停的通知一出，则意味着商家库房里的全部冻货，将全部无法销售，只能废弃。 部分商家为保住自己的货物，冒险继续销售冻货，其联合找到冻库房东H某，",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":155,"caseTypeCode":156},655,"J某涉嫌涉嫌侵犯商业秘密罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护，免于刑事处罚","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps493.jpg","一、案件罪名、结果、封面语 罪名：侵犯商业秘密罪 结果： 免于刑事处罚 封面语： 某生物科技企业机密案，J 某离职后涉嫌有偿披露信息，律师介入后从本案侦查管辖权有误、阅卷权遭侵，经营信息是否为商业秘密存争议，J 某行为未达犯罪情节严重标准，",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":185,"caseTypeName":186,"caseTypeCode":187},654,"D某侵犯公民个人信息罪，四川卓安律事务所律师团队为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F23\u002Fe43eb26b-6e6e-452b-ad54-ddd659fc49be.png","一、【案情简述】 2020年初，被告人D某在四川某大学读书期间，在网上申请注册（需要邮箱号、手机号、手机短信验证、姓名及身份证号等）、实名认证（本人微信、QQ扫码或人脸认证）“腾讯云网络帐号、购买和使用云服务器过程中，发现贩卖腾讯云账号（云",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",[189,192,197,200,203,208,211,217],{"id":38,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":193,"name":194,"summary":195,"keywords":196},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":156,"name":155,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":139,"name":138,"summary":201,"keywords":202},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":204,"name":205,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":185,"code":187,"name":186,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},790,"2026-10-13 13:51:35",78,"白山中院+吉林省看守所","受贿罪","2026年10月12、13日 彭栖伟 受贿罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Faeff63f5-4734-44b5-83fc-4fe483db46a8.png","2026-10-13 14:12:39","彭栖伟",[235],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,256,268,280],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":227,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":227,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},789,43,"宣汉县看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月13日 晏建强 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F9784a2ad-b503-4c72-8998-7d785f08998c.png","2026-10-13 14:11:53","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":258,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},788,84,"重庆永川区看守所+永川区检察院","寻衅滋事罪","2026年10月12日 罗杨 寻衅滋事罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F3df2920f-f2e5-4b8d-ae33-50efa7329c5d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:59","罗杨",[266],{"id":258,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":264,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F20\u002F71393bb0-30d8-4028-ad17-529bfa81f91d.jpg",{"id":269,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},787,98,"深圳市宝安区看守所","非法经营罪","2026年10月12日 彭乐程 非法经营罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002Fd8cbbe6b-17e3-472d-8660-19788cf7258d.png","2026-10-12 13:59:15","彭乐程",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F3e3833d3-0396-48d7-9b5f-7729393a0976.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":282,"city":283,"caseType":284,"title":285,"thumbnail":286,"content":10,"publishTime":287,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":288,"lawyers":289},786,10,"深圳市罗湖区人民检察院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年10月12日 陈志伟 猥亵儿童罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F13\u002F8b14a2f4-88d1-4d09-a2e1-385982107474.png","2026-10-12 13:58:30","陈志伟",[290],{"id":282,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",40,[],[295,300,305,310,315,320],{"id":40,"createdAt":296,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":31,"code":298,"name":299,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-13 16:28:19","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":301,"deleted":31,"code":302,"name":303,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":304,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:28:13","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":309,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:23","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":311,"deleted":31,"code":312,"name":313,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":314,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:29:52","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":185,"createdAt":316,"updatedAt":317,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":212,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":321,"deleted":31,"code":322,"name":323,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[326,329,332,335],{"value":327,"label":328},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":330,"label":331},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":333,"label":334},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":336,"label":337},"6","全国分所",[339,342,345],{"title":340,"desc":341},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":343,"desc":344},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":346,"desc":347},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":349,"description":13,"keywords":350,"canonical":351,"image":10,"jsonLd":352},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[353],{"@context":354,"@graph":355},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[356,362],{"@type":357,"@id":358,"url":351,"name":7,"inLanguage":359,"publisher":360},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":363,"@id":361,"name":7,"url":351,"logo":364,"image":364,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":359,"address":365,"geo":368,"department":370},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":367},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":369,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[371,376,380,384,388,392],{"@type":372,"@id":373,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":374,"parentOrganization":375},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":377,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":378,"parentOrganization":379},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":381,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":382,"parentOrganization":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":385,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":386,"parentOrganization":387},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":389,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":390,"parentOrganization":391},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":361},{"@type":372,"@id":393,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":366,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":361},{"entity":397,"seo":409},{"id":398,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":399,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":400,"title":401,"thumbnail":402,"content":403,"publishTime":404,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":405},938,"2026-10-21 17:47:57",11,"谈话时听到“别人都交代了”，我该怎么说？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F21\u002Fe9cac56e-1637-4b5a-9fb8-ef8f600807f6.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">谈话中被告知“别人都交代了、证据已经齐了”，仍应按自己的真实经历说明情况。确实发生的事应如实讲，没有经历的细节不能跟着补，暂时记不清的内容也不能猜成确定事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现行证据规则要求审查具体事实和证据。本文结合监察调查规则、检察机关公开报道及成安律师团队案例，说明三件事：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">• 别人已经承认，是否就等于自己的责任已经确定？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">• 金额、时间和参与过程有出入，怎样把不同情况说明白？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">• 笔录与原意不一致，本人和家属可以依法做什么？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">当下能抓住的，是把知道的、听说的和需要核实的分开，并指出可查证的材料。这样既履行如实说明义务，也使真实解释能够被记录、被核查，供后续依法审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、听到“证据齐了”，最容易在哪一步说错\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F21\u002F59383910-7685-4204-ac75-2e75d5dd3a92.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不能从一句话判断全案证据，更不能用附和代替回忆。回答应落到自己做过什么、知道什么、依据是什么。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">通知你去说明某个项目的情况。谈到一笔钱时，对方说，经办人已经承认，其他人也都讲清楚了，现在只差你的态度。你记得参与过项目，却不清楚别人私下怎样收款；你知道有过资金往来，却记不准具体金额。这时，一个很现实的念头会出现：既然别人都认了，我是不是也先认下来？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这是一类代表性处境。真正需要解决的，不是猜测对方掌握了多少材料，而是把提问中的事实逐项分开。别人承认自己收过钱，与你是否知道、是否参与、应承担多大责任，可能涉及不同的证明事项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如实说明包括不利事实，也包括有依据的解释。知道的事情不能故意隐瞒；没看见的收款、没听见的约定，不能因为对方说得肯定，就变成自己的亲历。对确实记不清的时间和数额，应说明记忆范围及核查方向，不为了显得配合而补出细节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文所说的“谈话”包含日常表达中的接受纪检监察了解情况。法律上的谈话、讯问和询问有不同适用对象：涉嫌职务违法的被调查人、涉嫌职务犯罪的被调查人和证人，应结合通知、权利义务告知及实际措施分别识别，不能仅凭“来聊聊”判断程序。[1][2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、别人已经承认，为什么仍要核查每一项事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">他人的说法是需要审查的材料。证明力来自内容真实、来源可靠并与全案证据相互验证，不来自“大家都这样说”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）“别人说过”与“已经证明”之间，还有核查过程\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第三十六条要求，监察机关收集、固定、审查、运用证据，应与刑事审判关于证据的要求和标准相一致；第四十三条要求同时收集有无违法犯罪、情节轻重的证据。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第六十七条、第六十八条、第七十条进一步要求查证属实、综合判断，职务犯罪证据不足的不得移送审查起诉。[1][2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">因此，“别人交代了”可能指向一份需要核查的供述或证言，却不能单独回答它具体证明谁、哪笔钱、哪次行为。几个人对同一件事作出一致陈述，可以有证明价值；仍需核查他们是否亲历、是否独立了解、关键细节有没有矛盾，不能只数人数。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">同样，法律没有规定受贿案件必须找到转账记录或现场录像才能认定。现金交付也可以通过言词证据、资金来源、行踪、后续使用等材料综合证明。不能把“其他证据”理解成某一种固定材料，也不能把没有本人供述理解为不能定案。《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第五十五条规定，口供不足以单独定罪，没有口供而证据确实、充分的也可以定罪。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）公开案件中的核查：钱从哪里来、怎样交付\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">江苏检察网2023年10月26日公开报道的康宁公司系列案中，行受贿双方说法存在明显金额差异。检察机关核对交付地点等细节，调取银行流水并向财务经办人员核实款项来源，补充证据后追加共同受贿事实。报道时，曹某已因受贿被判有期徒刑十年三个月，并处罚金70万元；陈某案仍在审理。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这是一篇检察机关公开办案报道，并非指导性案例。它展示的是用具体材料检验说法，不能据此推定本文读者的案件结论。其他人作出供述，仍需核查；本人否认，也不会使已有证据失去效力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（三）可以要求讲清具体事项，不能据此要求立即看全案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不知道所问的是哪次往来，可以提出核实具体项目、时间范围、款项及行为；对明确指认，可以逐项说明一致和不一致之处。这有助于准确回答，但不等于在监察调查中取得即时查阅他人笔录或全案证据的权利。说明事实的请求与诉讼阶段的阅卷权，应分别处理。[1][2][3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、已有一审结论，团队怎样继续核对每笔款项\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">案件已有不利结论，仍要检查每笔款项及其用途。能够改变评价的是具体事实和证据，而不是重复一句“我不同意”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）案件起点：贪污、受贿两罪，一审判处八年九个月\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的X某某案中，当事人原为某县民政局局长，一审被认定犯贪污罪、受贿罪，数罪并罚判处有期徒刑八年九个月。进入二审，争议已经不只是如何描述事情，而是原认定的金额、用途和相关情节是否有充分依据。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）把“套取的钱”拆回实际支付和使用过程\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队逐笔核对账目，围绕其中实际用于单位公务开销、支付必要税费及管理费的部分提出证据和意见，主张从贪污金额中扣除。对一审认定的相关不利情节，团队还比对同案人员裁判材料，提出应审查认定依据及处理一致性的意见，并梳理退赃、谅解、坦白和认罪悔罪情况。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这一工作方法与本文的问题相通：概括说“钱都经你手”“别人把总额认了”，仍需回到每笔款项。谁经手、谁使用、本人当时知道什么、用途有何证明，分别对应不同事实。解释如果只有一句“单位用的”，很难核查；落实为付款时间、收款对象、报销资料和审批环节，才有进一步审查的基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（三）二审结果和能够说明的范围\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该案二审采纳了团队的关键辩护意见，撤销一审判决，改判X某某有期徒刑六年六个月。这是二审改判，不是服刑期间的减刑；结果也不是无罪。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">二审改判涉及对事实、金额和量刑情节的综合审查，不能把全部刑期变化只归因于金额核对。该案的价值在于说明，既有陈述和认定仍须接受具体证据检验；是否扣除某项费用，须结合当时的具体用途、证据及法律条件判断，不能仅凭“用于公务”的解释决定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、当场说明时，把五件事情逐项讲清\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不必准备统一话术。把信息来源、每笔往来、记忆边界、笔录原意和更正依据分别说明，才便于依法核查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）审查要点一：把亲历与转述分开\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">提问中出现“你们早就商量好了”，应核实所谓商量发生在何时、有哪些人在场、本人听到什么、作过什么表示。参加过项目会议，不等于知道会外的送钱安排；后来听人说有费用，也不等于当时参与约定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">说明时保留信息来源。来自本人经历的，说清经过；来自他人转告的，说清谁在什么时候告诉自己；只是根据后来情况推测的，不能写成已经确认的事实。同期会议记录、原有工作邮件及消息上下文，可以帮助核查知情时间，单凭通讯记录通常不能直接证明通话内容。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">别人可能指出“你既然在场，不可能不知道”。对此应具体说明当时讨论事项、自己的职责和实际听到的内容，并提供可核实线索。依据是《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十三条及实施条例第六十七条、第六十八条对全面取证和综合判断的要求。[1][2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）审查要点二：把一个总数拆成每一笔\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">确实收过部分款项，不等于对提问中的总额都能确认。核对每笔时间、交付方式、经手人、实际金额、事由和去向，区分记得的收款、知道他人收取的款项，以及自己尚不了解的部分。真实存在的收款也不能因为总额有争议而一概否认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">银行记录能帮助核实转账，但账户进出额与犯罪金额不必然相同；现金则需核对相关账目、来源和使用等证据。也不能用“我只拿到一部分”直接排除共同犯罪责任，责任范围还须结合共同意思、分工及知情情况分析。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以确认某笔事实，同时对另一笔提出核查请求，不必在“全认”与“全否”之间选择。团队X某某案中的逐笔核对，展示的正是这种材料审查方法。相关判断仍须遵守实施条例第六十八条、第七十条及刑事诉讼法第五十五条的证明要求。[2][3][5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（三）审查要点三：记不准的细节，不猜成确定事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">旧项目往来多，记得大致经过却记不准日期，并不罕见。应分别说明记得什么、不确定什么、为什么不确定，以及可以通过哪些资料核实。例如能确定在某次项目验收之后，却不能确认具体日期，就应保留这一范围，不能直接接受提问中的某一天。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对“收了多少”“是否知道送钱安排”这类关键问题，更不能用猜测填补。后来查看资料恢复记忆的，应说明新依据，而不是把资料里的内容写成自己一直清楚记得。反复核实不意味着必须把每次表达修成完全相同，也不能以记忆不清掩盖明知的事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">实施条例第九十条要求如实回答，也要求如实记录、认真查核被讯问人的辩解。法律要求真实，不能据此要求人对确实无法确认的细节作出虚假的肯定。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（四）审查要点四：核对笔录时，尤其看限定语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“当时知道”与“事后听说”，“经手”与“占有”，“大约”与“确定”，会影响事实评价。核对笔录不能只看名字和总金额，还要检查信息来源、知情时间、款项性质及行为描述是否保留原意。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如果把听他人转述的事写成亲眼所见，或者删去了无法确认的部分，应指出具体位置，请求补充、更正。记录可以整理表达，却不能改变意思；不能因为文字更顺，就接受不属于自己的判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">实施条例第八十五条规定，谈话笔录应交本人核对，遗漏、差错应补充或更正，并在修改处捺指印；第九十一条将相关要求适用于讯问，第九十八条也将相关要求适用于询问。核对无误后再按规定逐页签名、捺指印。单纯拒签并不会使笔录自动消失。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（五）审查要点五：已经说错，说明依据；涉嫌非法取证，提供线索\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">发现前次陈述有误，应说明哪次、哪一处、错在什么、真实情况及核查依据。因记忆偏差而更正金额，与为配合别人而改变说法，性质不同。不能为了避免前后不一致，继续维持已知错误。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“别人都交代了”这句话本身，不能直接证明存在欺骗取证，也不能当然启动证据排除。若伴随暴力、严重侵害本人或近亲属合法权益的威胁等具体情形，应记录人员、时间、地点、方式、内容及相关录音录像、就医等线索，依法反映。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对内容不准确、证明力有疑问和取证方法违法，应分别提出更正、核查或排除请求。监察法第三十六条、第四十三条及实施条例第七十一条至第七十三条规定了取证要求和核查、排除路径；进入刑事诉讼后，再结合刑事诉讼法第五十六条至第六十条处理，不能把一般表达压力一律等同于法定排除事由。[1][2][3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、本人和家属现在可以依法做什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本人把事实说明准确，家属把合法持有的材料保存完整，律师按程序阶段评估争点。材料不在自己手里时，提供调取线索也有价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）本人围绕具体问题整理，避免越写越笼统\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对已经明确的项目或款项，可按发生顺序梳理：本人当时岗位、实际参加的环节、知道的信息、具体行为及材料出处。不要用“整个项目由我负责”代替本人权限和行动，也不要把对他人内心的推测写成事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在适用的谈话、讯问程序中，请求自行书写说明材料的，应按实施条例第八十六条、第九十一条处理。书面说明仍须真实，修改和提交应符合相应要求；能合法保留副本、接收信息的，应留存版本和提交时间，不以补说明为名倒签、补造历史文件。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）家属围绕争议找材料，不去找别人“核口径”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可以整理依法持有的流水、既有往来记录、出差安排及此前提交材料。只保存一张聊天截图，可能遗漏前后语境；只汇总收款额，也可能遗漏退款或重复记账。保存原始载体和完整上下文，并注明资料来源，比重新编辑一份有利叙述更有用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">具体材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">核实用途\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">保存或整理提醒\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">程序与说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">通知、权利义务告知、依法持有的说明版本\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">确定阶段、事项及此前表述\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">记录收到、形成及提交时间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">资金往来\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">完整流水、原有账目、付款及退回凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">逐笔核对金额、经手与去向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">标明对应款项；不补造历史凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">时间与过程\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">出差记录、会议资料、既有工作消息\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">核对在场、参与环节及知情时间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">保留完整上下文及原始载体\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">外部资料线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">资料名称、保管单位、持有人及拟证明事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">供依法评估收集、调取方式\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">不擅自取走档案或获取涉密资料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">具体异议\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">错误位置、真实情况、原因和佐证线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">区分补正、事实核查及取证异议\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">如实注明记忆范围和材料来源\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">单位档案、涉密资料、办案机关笔录不在家属合法掌握范围内的，应列明名称、保管单位和拟证明事项，交由专业人员评估调取方式。正常咨询、合法提交材料和依法反映问题都可以进行；不得联络他人约定回答、要求更改真实证言、删改记录或制作虚假凭证。[1][2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（三）律师在调查期间和移送以后，能做的工作不同\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察调查期间，律师可就家属掌握的情况提供咨询，协助分析现有材料、整理核查线索及起草相应说明，具体提交主体和方式应依法确定。不能承诺在留置期间按刑事诉讼会见制度见到本人，或直接查阅全案证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">案件移送人民检察院后，应先核实受理机关、程序和委托手续。律师依法会见，了解本人陈述及异议；自审查起诉之日起依法阅卷，再对照指认、各次供述、客观材料和取证程序，提出有针对性的核查意见或申请。《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条提供相应依据。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">向家属反馈哪些内容，应结合保密义务、本人意愿和委托约定。向机关提交的法律意见、律所工作底稿和可反馈的进展并非同一类文件，不能把全部案卷、会见记录当然转交家属。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（四）咨询时先带来一个具体争议\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">向成安律师团队咨询，可先说明：目前处于什么阶段，被问到哪一件事，自己确认和不确认的分别是什么，已有哪几项材料。团队可据此评估事实说明、材料保存、笔录异议及移送后的衔接工作，具体服务范围依实际情况和委托确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">听到“别人都交代了”，下一步是把眼前所问的一笔钱、一次会议或一个行为核对清楚。真实发生的如实说明，确有出入的指出依据，暂时不清楚的保留核查空间，让回答能够经受材料检验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>条文与案例来源索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1]《中华人民共和国监察法》，2024年12月25日修正，修改决定自2025年6月1日起施行。本文涉及第十八条至第二十二条、第三十六条、第四十三条、第四十四条。官方全文：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.samr.gov.cn\u002Fzw\u002Fzfxxgk\u002Ffdzdgknr\u002Fbgt\u002Fart\u002F2025\u002Fart_4c0c6c2ef585424ca74f1fed4ed6e4db.html\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2]《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》，2025年4月27日修订，国家监察委员会公告第2号公布，自2025年6月1日起施行。本文涉及第六十条、第六十七条至第七十三条、第七十七条、第八十五条至第九十一条、第九十六条、第九十八条。官方全文：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.samr.gov.cn\u002Fjjz\u002Fdjfg\u002Fgjflfg\u002Fart\u002F2025\u002Fart_688b276784a844488345dceec0ae5c52.html\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3]《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》，2018年10月26日修正。本文涉及第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条、第五十五条至第六十条。新华网受权发布全文，相关内容见第4、5页：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.xinhuanet.com\u002Fpolitics\u002F2018-10\u002F27\u002Fc_1123620821_4.htm\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.xinhuanet.com\u002Fpolitics\u002F2018-10\u002F27\u002Fc_1123620821_5.htm\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4]江苏检察网《王勇：对行受贿的重要细节刨根问底》，2023年10月26日，公开办案报道。本文仅按报道时点转述相关审查及裁判情况：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jsjc.gov.cn\u002Fzl\u002Fghsk\u002F202310\u002Ft20231026_235421.shtml\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5]成安律师团队授权脱敏案例：X某某贪污、受贿案二审。本文所列案件事实、审查方法和结果依据授权个案说明，具体以完整法律文书为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>附：成安律师及团队在本问题上的专业积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师长期从事刑事法律服务，相关研究包括《公职人员刑事法律风险防范实用手册》。其团队将职务犯罪案件中的证据审查经验用于危机初发时的事实梳理、材料保存和程序识别；专项风控工作涵盖谈话与真实陈述准备，并与移送后的诉讼辩护衔接。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">四川卓安律师事务所为上述工作提供团队研讨和分级质量审核支持。对本文这类问题，专业服务着眼于厘清经历、核对原始资料、识别具体异议及其适用程序，具体承办和交付以实际委托为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-21 17:47:27",{"id":400,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":31,"code":407,"name":408,"icon":32,"sort":218,"status":6,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":410,"description":411,"keywords":32,"canonical":412,"image":402,"jsonLd":413},"谈话时听到“别人都交代了”，我该怎么说？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】 谈话中被告知“别人都交代了、证据已经齐了”，仍应按自己的真实经历说明情况。确实发生的事应如实讲，没有经历的细节不能跟着补，暂时记不清的内容也不能猜成确定事实。 现行证据规则要求审查具体事实和证据。本文结合监察调查规则、检察机关公开报道及成安律师团队案例，说明三件事： • 别人已经承认，是否就等于","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F938",[414],{"@context":354,"@graph":415},[416,423],{"@type":417,"@id":412,"url":412,"headline":401,"description":411,"datePublished":418,"dateModified":419,"author":420,"publisher":421,"articleSection":408,"inLanguage":359,"image":422},"Article","2026-10-21T17:47:27+08:00","2026-10-21T17:47:57+08:00",{"@id":361},{"@id":361},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F21\u002Fe9cac56e-1637-4b5a-9fb8-ef8f600807f6.jpg",{"@type":424,"itemListElement":425},"BreadcrumbList",[426,429,431],{"@type":427,"position":6,"name":428,"item":351},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":427,"position":38,"name":408,"item":430},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":427,"position":35,"name":401,"item":412}]