[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1529":418},{"entity":4,"seo":370},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":204,"caseIntro":232,"latestLawyerNews":233,"lawyerNews":247,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":313,"serviceTags":314,"serviceCategories":315,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":346,"homeStats":347,"serviceProducts":360},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,129,134,139,145,152,160,164,169,175,180,185,190,197],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},912,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，三年变两年缓刑两年六个月","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F06d58a96-a7d9-4745-8fa4-dcdc5008fcd4.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名： 开设赌场罪 结果： 检察院建议3年 有期徒刑 ，法院判决2年有期徒刑， 缓刑 2年6个月 亮点： 鉴定意见存在重复计算；检察院采纳律师意见； 焦点： 鉴定意见是否存在重复计算； 案例综述： 本案中Z某本来只",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},911,"C某涉嫌境外电信网络诈骗，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功缓刑","罪名：诈骗罪 （境外电信网络诈骗） 取得成果： 检察院原定建议量刑三年以上 有期徒刑 。律师介入后，法院最终判处有期徒刑一年六个月， 缓刑 两年执行。 案情简介： C某是一名应届毕业生，和同学K某通过58同城找到了一份自己“专业对口”的工作",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},910,"X 某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功获终止侦查","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F572c07e8-be9b-4493-8edb-f3f4fde0c5d6.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：帮助信息 网络犯罪 活动罪 辩护结果 ：公安机关采纳律师意见，认为 X 某不构成犯罪，对其终止侦查 案件亮点 ：精准认定主观不明知；区分正常技术服务与犯罪帮助行为；公安机关认可涉案行为系合法兼职 封面语 ：X 某作",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":137,"summary":138,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},909,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、杨清瑶律师为其辩护，在检察院审查起诉阶段获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F388dea71-8be8-433f-8e90-175d9cc9ea01.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果： 不起诉（审查起诉阶段） 亮点： 审查起诉阶段不起诉；检察院听取律师意见 焦点： 架设VOIP设备帮助上游网络犯罪；情节是否轻微 案例综述： Z某在另一被告人Z某1的邀",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":10,"summary":142,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":143,"caseTypeCode":144},908,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","Q某原系某社区党委书记、居委会主任，因涉嫌 职务侵占罪 、 挪用资金罪 被成都市武侯区人民检察院提起 公诉 。 一、职务侵占事实 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任某社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":146,"title":147,"thumbnail":148,"summary":149,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":150,"caseTypeCode":151},907,"X 某某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案 —— 晏建强律师、汪艳律师辩护成功获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F303ac30d-2b78-485e-bc70-d6756737a5c8.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：合同 诈骗罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，对 X 某某作出存疑不起诉决定 案件亮点 ：指定监视居住10个月；精准区分经济合同纠纷与刑事犯罪；成功论证行为人无非法占有目的；检察院认可涉案行为系经营不善导致的违约 ","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":157,"caseTypeName":158,"caseTypeCode":159},906,"J某某涉嫌故意伤害罪案：晏建强、石大海律师精准辩护获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2a10b4da-900d-4af4-a5f8-12a43edf08b1.png","一、案件核心要素​ 罪名 ： 故意伤害罪 ​ 结果 ：检察院决定不予起诉​ 亮点 ：逮捕羁押6个月，律师精准突破证据链，检察院全额采纳辩护意见​ 焦点 ：现有证据能否证实 J 某某实施故意伤害行为，伤情与行为的因果关系是否成立​ 封面语 ：",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":157,"caseTypeName":158,"caseTypeCode":159},905,"Y涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护成功取保","一、案情简介 Y某与被害人因工作纠纷发生争执最后导致矛盾升级，Y某使用 管制 刀具将被害人刺伤。 二、办案经过 委托律师后，李辰君律师、晏建强律师第一时间会见Y某了解案件的具体情况。会见后李辰君律师、晏建强律师马上与办案单位沟通，同时与Y某",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":167,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":150,"caseTypeCode":151},904,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、陈庆山律师为其辩护，在检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fbbef24c5-b0e3-4272-abff-dc3db3a5d92f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：诈骗罪 结果：取保候审 亮点： 诈骗罪； 单位犯罪 ；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 受害人数量问题；诈骗金额问题；被告人身份认定问题； 封面语： 涉案公司涉嫌虚构办理某银行大额信用卡并骗取服务费，X某被",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":173,"caseTypeCode":174},903,"D某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案（37天）,四川卓安律师事务所吴强律师经过不懈努力，取保候审","案情简介 2017年，当事人D某（W某之父）在绵阳市公共场所无事生非、起哄闹事，造成公共场所秩序严重混乱。 辩护思路 办案律师在接受W某本人委托之后，立即与D某亲属会面，详细了解案件的事实和证据情况并对照法律规定、结合司法实践，确定了辩护思","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":150,"caseTypeCode":151},902,"Y某涉嫌合同诈骗罪，吴健南律师为其辩护，获检察院撤诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fcf9e95a6-bb69-4e2d-9843-aa6f28ba3ca3.png","一、案情介绍 2022年12月22日，因涉嫌合同 诈骗罪 ，Y某被云南省某县公安局刑事拘留，2023年9月4日，某县人民检察院以Y某犯 合同诈骗罪 提起 公诉 ，指控Y某在明知某高速路建设项目未取得建设许可、没有项目授权及批文的情况下，不核",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},901,"H某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所王子叶、钟灵柔律师为其辩护，获撤销案件处理","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F0eb6e99d-5b5e-4089-83ad-cef6f78e6048.png","一、案情简介 2023年12月，H某经过同事介绍兼职工作认识了主管L某，L某声称是正规公司做债务催收业务。只需要H某提供身份证和完成人脸识别认证手机卡，即可获得报酬。2024年3月22日，H某被某公安分局拘留，2024年4月23日，公安报送",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":188,"summary":189,"caseTypeId":157,"caseTypeName":158,"caseTypeCode":159},900,"C某某故意伤害一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师为其辩护检察院最终对其不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2090fccc-b267-4ada-b9af-f412f55c8115.png","一、【案情简述】 2023年1月22日早晨，C某与Z某发生口角并互相抓扯，后Z某受伤入院治疗。 公安机关以C某涉嫌 故意伤害罪 立案侦查之后，将案件移送检察机关。办案机关查明：“C某持刀在Z某腰部桶了一刀、左手臂捅一刀，左腋窝处被划了两刀、",{"id":191,"title":192,"thumbnail":193,"summary":194,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":195,"caseTypeCode":196},899,"L某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所汪余财律师为其辩护，获检察院不批准逮捕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F0a2593d8-5129-4698-b4e6-44c76cd812f6.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖毒品罪 结果： 不批准逮捕 亮点： 购买 管制 药品给他服用；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 购买一类、二类管制提供给他人服用是否构成贩卖毒品罪；是否获利；是否明知系管制药品 封面语： 小伙L某购买","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":198,"title":199,"thumbnail":200,"summary":201,"caseTypeId":79,"caseTypeName":202,"caseTypeCode":203},898,"H某某涉嫌盗窃罪，四川卓安律师事务所汪余财律师为其代理，获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F11b6489f-b1bc-4d38-8c46-dc3590e1fd2c.png","案件简介 四川 卓安律师 事务所汪余财律师（接受委托时在四川某律师事务所执业）代理的H某某涉嫌 盗窃罪 一案，H某某等三人系未成年人，起诉意见书指控H某某等三人在凌晨3时许，在某街边看见被害人停在街边的车窗未关，H某某望风，同案H某采取翻进","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",[205,208,211,214,217,220,223,229],{"id":41,"code":144,"name":143,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":174,"name":173,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":151,"name":150,"summary":212,"keywords":213},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":196,"name":195,"summary":215,"keywords":216},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":203,"name":202,"summary":218,"keywords":219},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":221,"keywords":222},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":224,"code":225,"name":226,"summary":227,"keywords":228},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":157,"code":159,"name":158,"summary":230,"keywords":231},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":191,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":234,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":235,"city":236,"caseType":237,"title":238,"thumbnail":239,"content":10,"publishTime":240,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":241,"lawyers":242,"lawyer":246},"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[243],{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[248,251,269,282,295],{"id":191,"createdAt":234,"updatedAt":234,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":235,"city":236,"caseType":237,"title":238,"thumbnail":239,"content":10,"publishTime":240,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":241,"lawyers":249},[250],{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":198,"createdAt":240,"updatedAt":240,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[260,263,268],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":261,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":265,"position":266,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":270,"createdAt":271,"updatedAt":271,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":272,"city":273,"caseType":274,"title":275,"thumbnail":276,"content":10,"publishTime":277,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":278,"lawyers":279},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[280],{"id":272,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":278,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":281,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":283,"createdAt":284,"updatedAt":284,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":285,"city":286,"caseType":287,"title":288,"thumbnail":289,"content":10,"publishTime":290,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":291,"lawyers":292},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[293],{"id":285,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":291,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":294,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":296,"createdAt":297,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":298,"city":299,"caseType":300,"title":301,"thumbnail":302,"content":10,"publishTime":303,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":304,"lawyers":305},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[306,309],{"id":298,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":307,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":308,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":310,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":311,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":312,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[316,321,326,331,336,341],{"id":43,"createdAt":317,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":34,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":322,"deleted":34,"code":323,"name":324,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":325,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":327,"deleted":34,"code":328,"name":329,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":330,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":332,"deleted":34,"code":333,"name":334,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":335,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":122,"createdAt":337,"updatedAt":338,"deleted":34,"code":339,"name":340,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":224,"createdAt":342,"updatedAt":343,"deleted":34,"code":344,"name":345,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[348,351,354,357],{"value":349,"label":350},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":352,"label":353},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":355,"label":356},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":358,"label":359},"6","全国分所",[361,364,367],{"title":362,"desc":363},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":365,"desc":366},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":368,"desc":369},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":371,"description":13,"keywords":372,"canonical":373,"image":10,"jsonLd":374},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[375],{"@context":376,"@graph":377},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[378,384],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"url":373,"name":7,"inLanguage":381,"publisher":382},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":385,"@id":383,"name":7,"url":373,"logo":386,"image":386,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":381,"address":387,"geo":390,"department":392},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":389},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":391,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[393,398,402,406,410,414],{"@type":394,"@id":395,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":396,"parentOrganization":397},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":399,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":400,"parentOrganization":401},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":403,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":404,"parentOrganization":405},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":407,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":408,"parentOrganization":409},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":411,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":412,"parentOrganization":413},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":415,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":416,"parentOrganization":417},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":383},{"entity":419,"seo":431},{"id":420,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":421,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":422,"title":423,"thumbnail":424,"content":425,"publishTime":426,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":427},1529,"2026-11-12 16:59:18",11,"退休公职人员：十多年前收礼被举报，现在怎么办？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F5e802f73-a750-47ab-b6fe-edf01a908217.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【摘要】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】已经退休、收款发生在十多年前，都不能单独说明现在是否还会被追责。应先核对收的是什么钱、与职务有什么关系，再核对刑事追诉期限；党纪、退休待遇及财物处理，需要另外判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现行法律与公开退休干部案件都说明，退休不会使历史事实消失。团队办理的二十年前国企改制案件，也提醒我们区分律师提出的时效意见与法院实际判决。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">十多年前的一笔钱，究竟适用多长追诉期限？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">即使刑事追诉受限，退休待遇会不会受到影响？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">接到谈话通知后，本人和家属应先整理什么？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先把任职、请托、收款、后续往来及退休日期排清楚，保存原始记录，再由律师结合具体事实评估，不凭一个年份决定如何应对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">一、旧事被举报后 先把三种风险分开\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】“还能不能追责”不是一个统一的期限问题。是否构成犯罪、是否超过刑事追诉期限、是否影响退休待遇，应分别核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“我已经退休两年，收钱也是十多年前的事，现在有人举报，是不是早就过期了？”这类顾虑很具体：本人担心被叫去谈话，家属担心留置和退休收入，却往往把几种责任混在一起。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">第一步是弄清被反映的具体事项。是节日礼金、真实借款，还是与项目审批、采购、职务调整有关的钱？同一个“收礼”的说法，可能对应不同事实。不能先接受“肯定受贿”的结论，也不能先用“年代太久”排除核查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">需要区分的事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">关键判断\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">可能涉及的后果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">党纪责任\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">是否为党员、行为事实及适用的党纪规则\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">符合条件的，仍可能受党纪处理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">退休待遇与财物\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">违法行为及其依法应受处理的档次、财物性质\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">按规定调整待遇，依法处理相关财物\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">刑事责任\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">是否构成犯罪、适用刑罚幅度、起算与例外\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">在法定条件下追诉，或者依法不再追诉\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对已经退休的公职人员，法律明确规定不再给予政务处分，但仍可以立案调查，并依条件处理待遇和财物。因此，“退休后不再给予政务处分”不能理解成“退休后不能调查”；刑事上不再追诉，也不能直接推导出其他处理全部消失。[2][7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">二、追诉期限与退休待遇 各有判断规则\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】刑事追诉期限取决于具体行为应适用的法定刑幅度及相关时间规则；退休待遇则依退休人员的专门规定处理。举报发生在今年，不代表期限从今年才开始。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）十多年是否已经届满 要先确定适用的刑罚幅度\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国刑法》第87条把追诉期限分为四档。这里的“法定最高刑”，是具体行为应适用的法定刑幅度中的最高刑，不是当事人估计自己最后会被判几年。受贿的金额、情节及适用法律不同，可能进入不同幅度，不能一律按五年或十年计算。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"302\">具体行为适用幅度的法定最高刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"287\">一般追诉期限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"302\">不满五年有期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"287\">五年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"302\">五年以上不满十年有期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"287\">十年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"302\">十年以上有期徒刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"287\">十五年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"302\">无期徒刑或者死刑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"287\">二十年；二十年后认为必须追诉的，须报请最高人民检察院核准\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">期限原则上从犯罪之日起算；行为存在连续或者继续状态的，从行为终了之日起算。在追诉期限以内又犯罪的，前罪期限从犯后罪之日起重新计算。第88条另有不受追诉期限限制的法定情形，需要核对相应立案、控告和逃避侦查或者审判等事实，不能仅凭“以前举报过”就下结论。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">确已超过追诉期限且不属于法定例外的，依法不再追究刑事责任，后续处理须对应所处程序。本人可以提出时效问题并提供依据，但不能据此自行拒绝依法进行的调查。[5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）刑事时效届满 不等于待遇和财物无需处理\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》第27条针对退休人员规定：不再给予政务处分，但可以立案调查；依法应当予以降级、撤职、开除的，按规定相应调整其享受的待遇；相关财物依第25条处理。具体调整哪些项目、调整多少，应核对本人身份、适用规定和正式决定，不能概括为“所有养老金一律停发”。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">党员的纪律审查不适用刑法的五年、十年等追诉期限。但调查历史行为仍要查清事实、准确适用规则。对尚未结案的旧行为，《中国共产党纪律处分条例》第158条规定了新旧规则的适用办法；政务处分法第67条也有时间效力规定。没有刑事追诉条件，不意味着可以忽略这些核对。[2][6][7]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）公开退休干部案件能说明什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中国纪检监察报》公开的梅云年案中，当事人2015年退休，2022年被立案审查调查并采取留置措施，后被开除党籍、按规定取消退休待遇。法院以受贿罪、利用影响力受贿罪、挪用公款罪数罪并罚，决定执行有期徒刑十一年，并处罚金七十万元，报道确认判决已生效。[8]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">报道区分了在职期间权钱交易的延续，与退休后利用原有影响、通过其他国家工作人员职务行为谋利，分别作受贿和利用影响力受贿评价。退休后仍可能追责，原因落在具体行为上。这是公开业务案例报道，并非指导性案例，不能拿它证明所有历史收款都未超过时效，也不能用其刑期推算另一人的结果。[8]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">三、二十年前的团队案件 为什么仍须先查事实与定性\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】追诉时效意见需要建立在具体事实和法律评价上。提出了时效意见，与法院已经认定超过时效，是两件事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的一起F某国企改制案件，涉及约二十年前的资产处置。F某被指控利用职务便利，伙同他人将国企宿舍、食堂等资产转入其新设公司，指控金额为1581万余元。案件的难点既包括年代久远，也包括改制背景下的行为性质、资产价值和证据之间能否相互印证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队没有只从“已经过去二十年”展开，而是围绕三个问题审查：指控的个人非法占有是否成立；如作其他罪名评价，是否应进一步审查相应追诉期限；用来支持涉案金额的评估等证据是否存在矛盾。团队提出了不构成贪污罪、备选评价为私分国有资产罪并审查时效的意见，也提出从犯、坦白和积极退赃等从宽意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">授权案例说明记载，法院采纳了部分意见，最终仍判F某犯贪污罪，有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年。这个结果必须准确理解：它不是超过时效后的撤案或无罪，也不能证明法院采纳了“私分国有资产罪已过时效”的主张。缓刑仍属于有罪判决。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本案并非退休收礼案件，不能直接套用其处理结果。它对当前危机应对的帮助在于：历史事项越久，越要把事实、罪名评价、适用刑罚幅度和期限逐层核对。如果一开始把所有往来统称为“人情”，或者把所有钱一概承认为“受贿”，后续时效分析的基础也可能出错。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">四、收到谈话通知前 重点核对四件事\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】先还原每笔往来，再分析时间和责任。整理材料的目的是准确说明既有事实，不能为了某种法律结论重新制造事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）这笔钱为什么给到你\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">把送款人与你的岗位关系、当时有无请托、你作过什么承诺或履职行为、钱如何交付和处置分别写清。真实借款要核对借款需求、当时约定、资金来源与实际还款；普通往来要核对交往背景和双方实际往来。不能只凭备注“借款”或本人称作“礼金”确定性质。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">同时比对当年的任职文件、审批记录与资金凭据。若主张“没替他办成事”，还要核实是否已经承诺谋利、明知具体请托，或者因既往履职事由收款。《中华人民共和国刑法》第385条及相关司法解释第13条要求结合这些事实评价，不能把“事情没办成”直接当作免责理由。[1][9]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）到底是一笔旧款 还是前后多次往来\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">按每次收款日期逐笔记录，而不是只写第一次。后续是否仍有收款、是否围绕同一请托、是否存在连续状态，都会影响时间判断。多次受贿未经处理的累计规则，与追诉期限的计算需要一并审查，既不能机械剔除最早几笔，也不能不分析就全部从最后一笔起算。[1][9]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">应把银行日期、项目节点和真实通信相互比对。后一次行为是否构成犯罪、是否发生在前罪追诉期限内，也需要法律判断。退休日期、举报日期、调查启动日期应另列，不要混作收款日期或当然的起算点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）当年退过钱或受过处理 具体处理了什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“单位知道过”“写过检查”“退过钱”不能替代正式文件。应找出当年的说明、收据、处理决定及送达记录，核对涉及哪笔钱、认定何种事实、是否属于同一事项，以及有无刑事处理文书。退钱或党纪处理本身，不足以证明相关刑事责任已经处理完毕。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">旧行为还要核对当时与后来法律、解释的时间效力。《中华人民共和国刑法》第12条确立相关适法原则，党纪和政务处理也有各自规定。不能拿今天某个金额标准直接倒推十多年前的全部法律后果，更不能因“过去查过”而隐去原处理材料。[1][2][6]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cstrong>（四）材料不全时 哪些是记忆 哪些有客观依据\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">久远事项确实可能记不清，但要区分亲历、听说和推测。能确认的如实说明；只能确定大致期间的，说明依据与范围；不能确定的，不因追问就猜出某一天或某个精确金额。后来查到材料发现原陈述有误，应把具体差异和原因如实反映。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">原件缺失时，列明缺什么、现存什么，以及可依法查找的银行或单位档案线索。事后写的回忆说明要标明形成时间，不能倒签成当年的凭证。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第67—70条要求以证据认定事实、综合核查，材料缺失不当然等于举报属实，也不当然等于无法认定。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">五、现在怎样应对 成都律师能帮到哪一步\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】本人先整理真实事实，家属保存合法掌握的材料；律师可在当前阶段开展风险咨询和材料分析，后续辩护权限随程序阶段确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">尚未接到通知时，可以先整理一张历史事项表，逐笔写明收款、关联职务行为、后续往来和原始凭据。收到通知后，保存通知内容，核对承办机关、要求到场的时间地点及身份；需要说明情况的，围绕亲历事实和材料作答。对记载不准确的笔录，阅读后提出具体更正。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">会不会留置，不能仅看是否退休或是否有人举报。《中华人民共和国监察法》第24条要求涉嫌严重职务违法或者职务犯罪、已掌握部分事实证据、仍有重要问题待查，并具备案情重大复杂、可能逃跑自杀、可能串供毁证或者其他妨碍调查等法定情形之一，且须依法审批。配合调查不等于当然不会留置，收到谈话通知也不等于必然留置。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本人患严重疾病等情况，应保存真实病历、诊断及用药记录，依法向承办机关反映，结合第23条评估责令候查等措施是否适用。已经留置的，本人及近亲属依法可以申请变更措施，是否同意由监察机关依法决定；不能把年纪大或有病直接等同于可以回家。[3]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可以整理合法持有的任职、退休待遇、家庭相关款项及健康材料，按来源保存，不去向旧交易对象统一说法。不应为换取撤回举报而私下付款，也不能删改记录、倒签借条或违法转移财物。确需退缴时，应如实核对款项并通过适用的正式渠道办理，保存凭证；退缴的法律效果另行判断。亲友应本人要求或经本人同意、自愿代为退赃，符合2026年解释（二）第22条规定情形的，可以视为本人积极退赃，但不保证具体处理结果。[1][2][11]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现在可以找律师咨询。监察调查阶段，可围绕收款性质、历史时间线、可能的时效争点、待遇风险及合法说明材料开展工作；现行制度没有赋予律师在这一阶段一般性的辩护会见、阅卷权。转入审查起诉后，依法接受辩护委托的律师可以会见、阅卷，进一步核对证据并提出意见。[5][10]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在成都寻求这类帮助，可以向由成安律师领衔的卓安刑事风控委员会咨询。第一次沟通先说明哪一年、什么岗位、哪几笔钱、现在收到什么通知；带上现有原始材料和缺失线索，重点核对还缺哪些事实、哪些问题需要向机关如实说明，以及下一步工作的条件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">附 卓安刑事风控委员会在本问题上的专业支撑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：卓安自2013年发起设立后持续开展刑事法律服务，团队长期办理职务犯罪及经济犯罪案件。文中F某案体现了历史事项中定性、金额证据与追诉时效一并审查的经验，既往结果不用于预测本次结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，公职人员风控与专项危机应对业务可围绕退休人员旧事被举报，分析历史往来、现有材料及程序风险；团队具有检察、审判等多元工作背景，可从调查所需事实与后续司法证据要求两个角度研判。具体服务范围以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">法律依据与公开案例来源\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">法律及公开案例来源如下，相关历史行为应另行核对时间效力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1]《中华人民共和国刑法》第12、64、87—89、383、385、386条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>法律文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2]《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》第5、11、25、27、67条。2020年7月1日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3]《中华人民共和国监察法》第23、24、50条。2024年修正，相关修改自2025年6月1日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4]《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第67—70条。2025年修订，自2025年6月1日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5]《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第16条第2项、第34、39、40条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>法律文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[6]《中国共产党纪律处分条例》第158条。2023年修订，自2024年1月1日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>中央印发文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[7]中央纪委国家监委网站《办理退休公职人员案件应注意的几个问题》，2021年12月22日。 \u003C\u002Fspan>公开业务文章\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[8]《中国纪检监察报》三堂会审《退休后两次索贿为何定性不同》，2023年3月1日，梅云年案。天津市纪委监委网站转载，公开报道未列案号。 \u003C\u002Fspan>公开案例报道\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[9]最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，法释〔2016〕9号，第13、15条，2016年4月18日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>司法解释全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[10]《中华人民共和国律师法》第31条。2026年修正，修改决定自2026年9月1日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>北京市司法局公布文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[11]最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（二）》，法释〔2026〕6号，第22条，2026年5月1日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>司法解释全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队案例说明：文中F某国企改制案件依据获授权的脱敏案例说明，非公开案号；仅据已确认的指控、辩护主张及判决结果展开，不将时效主张写成法院已采纳结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">免责声明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供普法参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。团队案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以完整资料为准；公开案例用于说明相应判断边界，不代替个案评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-12 16:58:59",{"id":422,"createdAt":428,"updatedAt":428,"deleted":34,"code":429,"name":430,"icon":35,"sort":157,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":432,"description":433,"keywords":35,"canonical":434,"image":424,"jsonLd":435},"退休公职人员：十多年前收礼被举报，现在怎么办？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】已经退休、收款发生在十多年前，都不能单独说明现在是否还会被追责。应先核对收的是什么钱、与职务有什么关系，再核对刑事追诉期限；党纪、退休待遇及财物处理，需要另外判断。 现行法律与公开退休干部案件都说明，退休不会使历史事实消失。团队办理的二十年前国企改制案件，也提醒我们区分律师提出的时效意见与法院实际","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1529",[436],{"@context":376,"@graph":437},[438,445],{"@type":439,"@id":434,"url":434,"headline":423,"description":433,"datePublished":440,"dateModified":441,"author":442,"publisher":443,"articleSection":430,"inLanguage":381,"image":444},"Article","2026-11-12T16:58:59+08:00","2026-11-12T16:59:18+08:00",{"@id":383},{"@id":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F5e802f73-a750-47ab-b6fe-edf01a908217.jpg",{"@type":446,"itemListElement":447},"BreadcrumbList",[448,451,453],{"@type":449,"position":6,"name":450,"item":373},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":449,"position":41,"name":430,"item":452},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":449,"position":38,"name":423,"item":434}]