[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1525":418},{"entity":4,"seo":370},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":204,"caseIntro":232,"latestLawyerNews":233,"lawyerNews":247,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":313,"serviceTags":314,"serviceCategories":315,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":346,"homeStats":347,"serviceProducts":360},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,129,134,139,145,152,160,164,169,175,180,185,190,197],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},912,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，三年变两年缓刑两年六个月","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F06d58a96-a7d9-4745-8fa4-dcdc5008fcd4.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名： 开设赌场罪 结果： 检察院建议3年 有期徒刑 ，法院判决2年有期徒刑， 缓刑 2年6个月 亮点： 鉴定意见存在重复计算；检察院采纳律师意见； 焦点： 鉴定意见是否存在重复计算； 案例综述： 本案中Z某本来只",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},911,"C某涉嫌境外电信网络诈骗，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功缓刑","罪名：诈骗罪 （境外电信网络诈骗） 取得成果： 检察院原定建议量刑三年以上 有期徒刑 。律师介入后，法院最终判处有期徒刑一年六个月， 缓刑 两年执行。 案情简介： C某是一名应届毕业生，和同学K某通过58同城找到了一份自己“专业对口”的工作",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},910,"X 某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功获终止侦查","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F572c07e8-be9b-4493-8edb-f3f4fde0c5d6.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：帮助信息 网络犯罪 活动罪 辩护结果 ：公安机关采纳律师意见，认为 X 某不构成犯罪，对其终止侦查 案件亮点 ：精准认定主观不明知；区分正常技术服务与犯罪帮助行为；公安机关认可涉案行为系合法兼职 封面语 ：X 某作",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":137,"summary":138,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},909,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、杨清瑶律师为其辩护，在检察院审查起诉阶段获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F388dea71-8be8-433f-8e90-175d9cc9ea01.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果： 不起诉（审查起诉阶段） 亮点： 审查起诉阶段不起诉；检察院听取律师意见 焦点： 架设VOIP设备帮助上游网络犯罪；情节是否轻微 案例综述： Z某在另一被告人Z某1的邀",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":10,"summary":142,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":143,"caseTypeCode":144},908,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","Q某原系某社区党委书记、居委会主任，因涉嫌 职务侵占罪 、 挪用资金罪 被成都市武侯区人民检察院提起 公诉 。 一、职务侵占事实 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任某社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":146,"title":147,"thumbnail":148,"summary":149,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":150,"caseTypeCode":151},907,"X 某某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案 —— 晏建强律师、汪艳律师辩护成功获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F303ac30d-2b78-485e-bc70-d6756737a5c8.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：合同 诈骗罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，对 X 某某作出存疑不起诉决定 案件亮点 ：指定监视居住10个月；精准区分经济合同纠纷与刑事犯罪；成功论证行为人无非法占有目的；检察院认可涉案行为系经营不善导致的违约 ","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":157,"caseTypeName":158,"caseTypeCode":159},906,"J某某涉嫌故意伤害罪案：晏建强、石大海律师精准辩护获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2a10b4da-900d-4af4-a5f8-12a43edf08b1.png","一、案件核心要素​ 罪名 ： 故意伤害罪 ​ 结果 ：检察院决定不予起诉​ 亮点 ：逮捕羁押6个月，律师精准突破证据链，检察院全额采纳辩护意见​ 焦点 ：现有证据能否证实 J 某某实施故意伤害行为，伤情与行为的因果关系是否成立​ 封面语 ：",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":157,"caseTypeName":158,"caseTypeCode":159},905,"Y涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护成功取保","一、案情简介 Y某与被害人因工作纠纷发生争执最后导致矛盾升级，Y某使用 管制 刀具将被害人刺伤。 二、办案经过 委托律师后，李辰君律师、晏建强律师第一时间会见Y某了解案件的具体情况。会见后李辰君律师、晏建强律师马上与办案单位沟通，同时与Y某",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":167,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":150,"caseTypeCode":151},904,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、陈庆山律师为其辩护，在检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fbbef24c5-b0e3-4272-abff-dc3db3a5d92f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：诈骗罪 结果：取保候审 亮点： 诈骗罪； 单位犯罪 ；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 受害人数量问题；诈骗金额问题；被告人身份认定问题； 封面语： 涉案公司涉嫌虚构办理某银行大额信用卡并骗取服务费，X某被",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":173,"caseTypeCode":174},903,"D某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案（37天）,四川卓安律师事务所吴强律师经过不懈努力，取保候审","案情简介 2017年，当事人D某（W某之父）在绵阳市公共场所无事生非、起哄闹事，造成公共场所秩序严重混乱。 辩护思路 办案律师在接受W某本人委托之后，立即与D某亲属会面，详细了解案件的事实和证据情况并对照法律规定、结合司法实践，确定了辩护思","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":150,"caseTypeCode":151},902,"Y某涉嫌合同诈骗罪，吴健南律师为其辩护，获检察院撤诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fcf9e95a6-bb69-4e2d-9843-aa6f28ba3ca3.png","一、案情介绍 2022年12月22日，因涉嫌合同 诈骗罪 ，Y某被云南省某县公安局刑事拘留，2023年9月4日，某县人民检察院以Y某犯 合同诈骗罪 提起 公诉 ，指控Y某在明知某高速路建设项目未取得建设许可、没有项目授权及批文的情况下，不核",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},901,"H某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所王子叶、钟灵柔律师为其辩护，获撤销案件处理","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F0eb6e99d-5b5e-4089-83ad-cef6f78e6048.png","一、案情简介 2023年12月，H某经过同事介绍兼职工作认识了主管L某，L某声称是正规公司做债务催收业务。只需要H某提供身份证和完成人脸识别认证手机卡，即可获得报酬。2024年3月22日，H某被某公安分局拘留，2024年4月23日，公安报送",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":188,"summary":189,"caseTypeId":157,"caseTypeName":158,"caseTypeCode":159},900,"C某某故意伤害一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师为其辩护检察院最终对其不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2090fccc-b267-4ada-b9af-f412f55c8115.png","一、【案情简述】 2023年1月22日早晨，C某与Z某发生口角并互相抓扯，后Z某受伤入院治疗。 公安机关以C某涉嫌 故意伤害罪 立案侦查之后，将案件移送检察机关。办案机关查明：“C某持刀在Z某腰部桶了一刀、左手臂捅一刀，左腋窝处被划了两刀、",{"id":191,"title":192,"thumbnail":193,"summary":194,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":195,"caseTypeCode":196},899,"L某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所汪余财律师为其辩护，获检察院不批准逮捕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F0a2593d8-5129-4698-b4e6-44c76cd812f6.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖毒品罪 结果： 不批准逮捕 亮点： 购买 管制 药品给他服用；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 购买一类、二类管制提供给他人服用是否构成贩卖毒品罪；是否获利；是否明知系管制药品 封面语： 小伙L某购买","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":198,"title":199,"thumbnail":200,"summary":201,"caseTypeId":79,"caseTypeName":202,"caseTypeCode":203},898,"H某某涉嫌盗窃罪，四川卓安律师事务所汪余财律师为其代理，获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F11b6489f-b1bc-4d38-8c46-dc3590e1fd2c.png","案件简介 四川 卓安律师 事务所汪余财律师（接受委托时在四川某律师事务所执业）代理的H某某涉嫌 盗窃罪 一案，H某某等三人系未成年人，起诉意见书指控H某某等三人在凌晨3时许，在某街边看见被害人停在街边的车窗未关，H某某望风，同案H某采取翻进","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",[205,208,211,214,217,220,223,229],{"id":41,"code":144,"name":143,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":174,"name":173,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":151,"name":150,"summary":212,"keywords":213},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":196,"name":195,"summary":215,"keywords":216},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":203,"name":202,"summary":218,"keywords":219},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":221,"keywords":222},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":224,"code":225,"name":226,"summary":227,"keywords":228},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":157,"code":159,"name":158,"summary":230,"keywords":231},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":191,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":234,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":235,"city":236,"caseType":237,"title":238,"thumbnail":239,"content":10,"publishTime":240,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":241,"lawyers":242,"lawyer":246},"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[243],{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[248,251,269,282,295],{"id":191,"createdAt":234,"updatedAt":234,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":235,"city":236,"caseType":237,"title":238,"thumbnail":239,"content":10,"publishTime":240,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":241,"lawyers":249},[250],{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":198,"createdAt":240,"updatedAt":240,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[260,263,268],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":261,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":265,"position":266,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":270,"createdAt":271,"updatedAt":271,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":272,"city":273,"caseType":274,"title":275,"thumbnail":276,"content":10,"publishTime":277,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":278,"lawyers":279},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[280],{"id":272,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":278,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":281,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":283,"createdAt":284,"updatedAt":284,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":285,"city":286,"caseType":287,"title":288,"thumbnail":289,"content":10,"publishTime":290,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":291,"lawyers":292},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[293],{"id":285,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":291,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":294,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":296,"createdAt":297,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":298,"city":299,"caseType":300,"title":301,"thumbnail":302,"content":10,"publishTime":303,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":304,"lawyers":305},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[306,309],{"id":298,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":307,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":308,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":310,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":311,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":312,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[316,321,326,331,336,341],{"id":43,"createdAt":317,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":34,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":322,"deleted":34,"code":323,"name":324,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":325,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":327,"deleted":34,"code":328,"name":329,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":330,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":332,"deleted":34,"code":333,"name":334,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":335,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":122,"createdAt":337,"updatedAt":338,"deleted":34,"code":339,"name":340,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":224,"createdAt":342,"updatedAt":343,"deleted":34,"code":344,"name":345,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[348,351,354,357],{"value":349,"label":350},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":352,"label":353},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":355,"label":356},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":358,"label":359},"6","全国分所",[361,364,367],{"title":362,"desc":363},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":365,"desc":366},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":368,"desc":369},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":371,"description":13,"keywords":372,"canonical":373,"image":10,"jsonLd":374},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[375],{"@context":376,"@graph":377},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[378,384],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"url":373,"name":7,"inLanguage":381,"publisher":382},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":385,"@id":383,"name":7,"url":373,"logo":386,"image":386,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":381,"address":387,"geo":390,"department":392},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":389},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":391,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[393,398,402,406,410,414],{"@type":394,"@id":395,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":396,"parentOrganization":397},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":399,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":400,"parentOrganization":401},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":403,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":404,"parentOrganization":405},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":407,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":408,"parentOrganization":409},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":411,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":412,"parentOrganization":413},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":415,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":416,"parentOrganization":417},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":383},{"entity":419,"seo":431},{"id":420,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":421,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":422,"title":423,"thumbnail":424,"content":425,"publishTime":426,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":427},1525,"2026-11-12 16:57:54",11,"国企财务总监离任审计 查出费用缺口该怎么办","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fe1b17070-63b0-4390-8d7b-20640ac22c76.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">离任审计发现项目费用有缺口，不等于财务总监贪污，也不能凭“我没拿钱”排除刑事风险。先把未结算、凭证缺失、异常付款和实际损失分开，再核对本人应当审核什么、实际做了什么。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">采购审批失职的公开判决表明，未履行必要审核职责并造成严重损失，也可能构成犯罪。团队案件则说明，款项的真实用途值得逐笔核实，不能把套取金额直接等同于个人非法占有金额。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">缺口究竟是手续问题，还是资金已经流失？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">签字、复核和付款权限分别意味着什么？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">报告出具前，哪些事实应当书面反馈？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先从审计问题清单中选出争议最大的款项，整理业务、审批、支付和去向，再判断责任与下一步动作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、审计查出缺口先别把所有问题算成一件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“费用缺口”只是一个概括。它可能指附件不齐、结算未完成，也可能指重复支付或资金被侵占。应先核对审计究竟发现了什么。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“我是国企财务总监，离任审计说一个项目有大额费用缺口。我没拿钱，但不少付款经过我签字，接下来怎么办？”这类处境中，最需要解决的是把模糊的问题还原成可以核实的事项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先拿到本人依法可以取得的审计通知、问题清单或征求意见材料，确认缺口的计算口径。审计指的是账上没有凭证、资金没有回来、项目没有交付，还是已经认定实际损失？几种情况可能重叠，不能重复计算，也不能相互替代。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">审计所指情形\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">先核对什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">不能直接推出的结论\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">尚未结算或预付款挂账\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">合同履行、结算条件、债权及回收情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">挂账金额全部是实际损失\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">发票或业务附件缺失\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">业务是否发生、收款方与交付记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">缺附件就是虚构业务\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">重复付款或账实不符\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">同一合同累计付款、退回及冲抵情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">全部由最后签字人承担\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">资金流向个人或关联方\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">实际控制、用途、返还及利益关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">只凭账户名称即可定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">已有损失计算结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">计算时点、依据、回收及重复列项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">审计金额自动等于犯罪金额\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">审计反馈可以同时说明两件事：某笔支出确有程序瑕疵；现有材料尚不能证明款项被本人占有。承认已经查实的错误，不意味着必须认可未经核实的金额和性质。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">违纪、职务违法与犯罪应分别依其规则评价。《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》第五条要求处分事实清楚、证据确凿；刑事责任还要符合相应犯罪的构成条件。不能把“财务管理不规范”直接换成“贪污”，也不能因暂时只谈整改就断言不会移送。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][3]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、没拿钱仍要核对是否履行了应有职责\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">贪污、受贿与失职、滥用职权的判断重点不同。个人是否获利很重要，但不能代替对审核职责和损失形成过程的检查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）风险先按行为分开\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十二条要求核对利用职务便利非法占有公共财物等事实；第三百八十五条规定的受贿，需要核对索取财物，或者非法收受财物、为他人谋取利益等条件。“缺口大”本身不能替代这些要件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">同法第一百六十八条则涉及国有公司、企业工作人员严重不负责任或者滥用职权，造成企业破产或者严重损失，致使国家利益遭受重大损失等情形。适用时要核对主体、具体职责、行为、后果及因果关系，不能把一般经营亏损都认定为犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">国企财务总监也不当然是刑法第三百九十七条意义上的国家机关工作人员。岗位所在单位、任职来源和实际公务职责，应与拟涉及罪名分别对应，不能只凭“公职人员”四个字套用玩忽职守罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）采购付款审核案说明了什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">上海市宝山区人民法院（2022）沪0113刑初705号刑事判决载明：三名国有公司管理人员审核钢材采购合同及付款申请时，没有核查是否签订相应合同、申请金额是否符合合同应付金额，致使另一采购人员得以在同一合同下反复申请付款，转卖所贪污的钢材，造成特别重大损失。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">法院的判断落在具体的审核失守上。判决列明的证据包括采购业务流程、任免材料、付款申请及审批表、专项审计报告及附件、证言和供述。审计报告是其中一类材料，职责来源、付款行为和损失也有其他证据对应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该院以国有公司人员失职罪分别判处刘某、叶某有期徒刑二年六个月，缓刑三年；判处蔡某有期徒刑一年六个月，缓刑一年六个月。判决同时考虑了自首、认罪认罚等情节。这里引用的是公开一审判决，不把其刑期作为其他案件的预测。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这个案件提醒财务负责人：应当回答“这一栏签字要求我核查哪些事项，我当时根据什么材料作出判断”。它并不证明所有签字都有罪；岗位承担的审核义务、能够发现的异常、实际履职和损失联系，仍须分别查明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、团队案例中公务支出怎样影响金额判断\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">查清款项真实用途，可能影响金额认定；但“为了单位”不是一句可以免除责任的解释，更不能用来掩盖真实的个人占有。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）X某某案的逐笔核对\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的X某某贪污、受贿案中，当事人原任某县民政局局长，一审数罪并罚判处有期徒刑八年九个月。团队在二审核对账目，围绕其中实际用于单位公务开销、必要税费和管理费的部分提出金额审查意见，并提供相应证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队还对照同案裁判提出情节认定方面的意见，结合退赃、坦白等情况争取从宽。授权案例说明记载，二审采纳关键辩护意见，撤销一审判决，改判有期徒刑六年六个月。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这个结果包含多项审查和量刑因素。不能把全部改判幅度都归因于某一笔公务支出，也不能据此说当事人无罪。资料没有披露各笔核减金额，本文不补造数字。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）对审计期间的实际启发\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如果审计把套取、提取或经手的全部金额列为疑似个人占有，应核对哪些款项真实用于业务、依据是什么、谁批准、最终由谁取得。原有的合同、支付及履行资料，比后来补写一句“用于公事”更能帮助核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这种核对也有反面。团队办理的另一W某案中，国企干部通过假账、假收据套取公款98万余元用于个人开销，最终被判贪污罪，有期徒刑三年，缓刑五年。案例说明其具有主动交代、退还款项等情节，但没有因此取得不起诉结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">两案的区别在真实用途和其他事实，不能用同一种说法覆盖。X某某案发生在司法审查阶段，也不是国企财务总监离任审计案；这里只借其说明逐笔核实支出的价值，不声称在审计阶段补材料就能获得同样结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、把缺口与本人责任对应起来需要查四项\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">每一笔争议款项都应同时回答四个问题：缺在哪里、谁应当做什么、钱实际去了哪里、损失怎样形成。只列金额，不能完成个人责任判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）审查要点一 缺口怎样计算\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先记录审计采用的账户、期间、合同和口径。把项目总支出、缺附件金额、超付金额、未收回款和实际损失分列；同一笔钱若同时出现在几张表中，应标明对应关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">拿付款流水与合同台账、结算及回收记录逐笔核对。预付款尚未结算不必然等于损失，账面仍有债权也不当然说明能够收回。对“尚能追回”的解释，需要有债务人履行能力、担保和实际回款等材料支持。涉及犯罪损失时，还应按拟适用罪名核对计算时点与规则，不能自行用预计收益抵减。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）审查要点二 本人承担哪一层职责\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将任职文件、授权、岗位说明、财务制度与涉事时的实际分工对照。财务复核可能涉及票据、预算、合同付款条件或累计付款比例；业务部门可能负责交付和验收。哪些属于本人义务，要有当时适用的依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对每次签批核查原始审批记录、所附材料、系统权限和本人提出的意见。不能只因资金发生在任期内就全部归责；也不能以“领导同意”排除本人独立审核职责。上海采购审批案恰恰说明，不核查应核查的合同和金额，可能产生实质责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）审查要点三 款项用途和个人认识是什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核对付款对象、最终用途、是否由本人实际控制，以及本人是否明知他人侵占仍提供帮助。没有收款不等于当然不涉及共同犯罪；有一笔转款也不能未经核实就认定为个人获利。应把本人亲历、他人转述和暂不清楚的部分分开。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将合同、发票、验收、银行记录和原始沟通相互比对。发票真实不代表业务真实，业务实际发生也不代表价格、付款及审批全部合规。主张公务用途，应查明具体业务和实际受益者，不用事后拼凑的用途清单代替凭据。涉及贪污及共同犯罪，分别依刑法第三百八十二条、第二十五条核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）审查要点四 不当履职与损失怎样相连\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">把决策、合同履行、付款、异常预警、发现及处置列成时间线。重点核对本人何时接触风险、是否有权制止或报告、采取过什么措施，以及即使正确履职能否避免或减少相关损失。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">项目亏损可能涉及市场变化、业务欺诈、审批失守或多种原因。不能只因最后亏损就倒推此前决策必然违法。原始风险提示、书面反对意见、催收和交接记录可供检验，但不能事后倒签。适用经济责任审计规定时，其第三十九条也要求结合职责分工、历史背景、决策过程和实际作用定责；审计中的直接责任、领导责任仍不等同于刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、报告出具前本人和家属可以落实哪些事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">当前可做的是及时提交真实、具体的事实反馈，保存原有材料，并按所处阶段评估风险。把账面调整平，不等于把法律问题解决了。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）先确认反馈渠道和截止时间\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核实这是审计机关开展的经济责任审计，还是集团内审、专项审计或中介机构受托审计，并确认本人是被审计对象还是相关责任人员。财务总监并非一概属于2019年经济责任审计规定第四条所列主要领导人员。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">确属该规定适用范围的，被审计领导干部及其所在单位应依第三十二条，自收到审计组审计报告之日起10个工作日内提出书面意见；正式报告的异议依第三十七条另有申诉程序。内部审计等情形，应另核适用制度及实际通知，不能机械套用这些期限。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">反馈按问题编号写明：审计表述、本人确认的事实、具体异议、附件编号、仍需调取的线索。保存提交版本和收件记录。尚未取得材料的，先如实列明缺口和所在单位，不为赶期限编造结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）本人从一笔争议款项做起\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">选择金额较大或定性争议最明显的一笔，依次放入合同、审批、付款、履行或验收、后续去向。另附涉事时的职责依据，说明本人在哪一步参与、当时看到什么。可以建立核对表，但应保留原件、原始数据和完整上下文，不覆盖原账。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">原件缺失时，记录缺失原因和查找情况，通过有权保管的单位依法查找原有留档。新取得的副本注明来源和取得日期。需要会计调整或追收款项的，依正式程序进行；这些动作的法律意义与既往行为应分别评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）若收到谈话或移送信息\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第三十七条规定，审计机关等发现相关职务违法犯罪线索，应移送监察机关依法调查处置。移送线索不等于已经定罪，也不以最终证据全部查齐为前提。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">留置还须符合该法第二十四条的条件：涉嫌相应严重职务违法或者职务犯罪，已有部分事实及证据，仍有重要问题待查，并存在案情重大复杂、可能逃跑自杀、可能串供毁证或其他妨碍调查等法定情形之一，经依法审批。仅凭“缺口很大”或“我没有获利”都不能直接判断会否留置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">接到联系后，核实机关、事由和需要提供的材料，如实陈述。家属可以保存合法掌握的相关记录，协助咨询；不要擅自进入单位系统或取走档案，不联系有关人员统一说法。依法咨询、提交真实材料与申辩本身不等于对抗调查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）成都律师此时能具体帮什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">审计期间，律师可根据合法取得的材料，协助区分账务、履职和涉嫌犯罪事项，梳理职责与资金，整理事实反馈。是否需要财务专业人员参与、由谁委托及材料使用范围，应具体确认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察调查阶段可开展法律咨询及合法材料整理等工作，不能承诺享有普通刑事侦查中的一般性辩护会见、阅卷权限。进入审查起诉后，依法办理委托的辩护律师可依《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第四十条阅卷，再审查金额、职责和证据；两类工作的权限与材料基础不同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[5]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">咨询前先备好审计问题清单、一笔争议款的现有资料和岗位职责依据，说明收到材料的日期及反馈要求。下一步应明确最急需核对哪项事实，而非先承诺把全部问题“摆平”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>附 与审计缺口应对相关的专业支撑\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：四川卓安律师事务所累计办理职务犯罪案件600余件。本文所述团队案件，体现了核对资金用途、区分定性与量刑争点的实践积累；该统计属于律所口径，不代表成安律师个人承办数量。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，面向公职人员、国企管理人员等开展风险识别与危机应对。就审计缺口，可围绕问题分类、职责及资金路径、真实材料反馈开展咨询，具体工作依事实、程序及委托范围确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队协作：具备原检察机关反贪办案、刑事审判等经历的成员可提供不同审查视角，并结合案件研讨和质量管理机制复核重要争点。相关经验用于分析证据和责任，不构成对处理结果的保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>来源索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">法律与公开案例核验截至2026年11月12日。条号对应正文标注。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1]《中华人民共和国刑法》第25、93、168、382、385、397条。国家税务总局政策法规库整合文本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2]《中华人民共和国监察法》第18、24、36、37条，2024年修正，2025年6月1日起施行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3]《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》第5条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4]《党政主要领导干部和国有企事业单位主要领导人员经济责任审计规定》第4、31—32、37—42条，2019年公布。适用时须核对审计类型及对象。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">审计署全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5]《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第34、39—40、170条，采用已生效文本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[6]上海市宝山区人民法院（2022）沪0113刑初705号刑事判决，2022年10月28日。普通公开裁判案例。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">裁判文书\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队案例依据经授权的X某某贪污、受贿案及W某贪污案脱敏说明，案例结果须结合各案完整资料理解。服务数据与组织信息采用经确认的对外口径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。个案应结合行为时间、身份、程序及证据评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-12 16:57:29",{"id":422,"createdAt":428,"updatedAt":428,"deleted":34,"code":429,"name":430,"icon":35,"sort":157,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":432,"description":433,"keywords":35,"canonical":434,"image":424,"jsonLd":435},"国企财务总监离任审计 查出费用缺口该怎么办 - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】 离任审计发现项目费用有缺口，不等于财务总监贪污，也不能凭“我没拿钱”排除刑事风险。先把未结算、凭证缺失、异常付款和实际损失分开，再核对本人应当审核什么、实际做了什么。 采购审批失职的公开判决表明，未履行必要审核职责并造成严重损失，也可能构成犯罪。团队案件则说明，款项的真实用途值得逐笔核实，不能把","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1525",[436],{"@context":376,"@graph":437},[438,445],{"@type":439,"@id":434,"url":434,"headline":423,"description":433,"datePublished":440,"dateModified":441,"author":442,"publisher":443,"articleSection":430,"inLanguage":381,"image":444},"Article","2026-11-12T16:57:29+08:00","2026-11-12T16:57:54+08:00",{"@id":383},{"@id":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fe1b17070-63b0-4390-8d7b-20640ac22c76.jpg",{"@type":446,"itemListElement":447},"BreadcrumbList",[448,451,453],{"@type":449,"position":6,"name":450,"item":373},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":449,"position":41,"name":430,"item":452},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":449,"position":38,"name":423,"item":434}]