[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1524":418},{"entity":4,"seo":370},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":204,"caseIntro":232,"latestLawyerNews":233,"lawyerNews":247,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":313,"serviceTags":314,"serviceCategories":315,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":346,"homeStats":347,"serviceProducts":360},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,129,134,139,145,152,160,164,169,175,180,185,190,197],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},912,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，三年变两年缓刑两年六个月","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F06d58a96-a7d9-4745-8fa4-dcdc5008fcd4.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点 罪名： 开设赌场罪 结果： 检察院建议3年 有期徒刑 ，法院判决2年有期徒刑， 缓刑 2年6个月 亮点： 鉴定意见存在重复计算；检察院采纳律师意见； 焦点： 鉴定意见是否存在重复计算； 案例综述： 本案中Z某本来只",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},911,"C某涉嫌境外电信网络诈骗，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，成功缓刑","罪名：诈骗罪 （境外电信网络诈骗） 取得成果： 检察院原定建议量刑三年以上 有期徒刑 。律师介入后，法院最终判处有期徒刑一年六个月， 缓刑 两年执行。 案情简介： C某是一名应届毕业生，和同学K某通过58同城找到了一份自己“专业对口”的工作",{"id":130,"title":131,"thumbnail":132,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},910,"X 某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案 —— 晏建强律师辩护成功获终止侦查","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F572c07e8-be9b-4493-8edb-f3f4fde0c5d6.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：帮助信息 网络犯罪 活动罪 辩护结果 ：公安机关采纳律师意见，认为 X 某不构成犯罪，对其终止侦查 案件亮点 ：精准认定主观不明知；区分正常技术服务与犯罪帮助行为；公安机关认可涉案行为系合法兼职 封面语 ：X 某作",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":137,"summary":138,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},909,"Z某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、杨清瑶律师为其辩护，在检察院审查起诉阶段获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F388dea71-8be8-433f-8e90-175d9cc9ea01.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 结果： 不起诉（审查起诉阶段） 亮点： 审查起诉阶段不起诉；检察院听取律师意见 焦点： 架设VOIP设备帮助上游网络犯罪；情节是否轻微 案例综述： Z某在另一被告人Z某1的邀",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":10,"summary":142,"caseTypeId":41,"caseTypeName":143,"caseTypeCode":144},908,"Q某涉嫌挪用资金、职务侵占罪，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","Q某原系某社区党委书记、居委会主任，因涉嫌 职务侵占罪 、 挪用资金罪 被成都市武侯区人民检察院提起 公诉 。 一、职务侵占事实 2019 年至2024年1月，被告人Q某利用担任某社区党委书记和社区居委会主任的职务便利，将实际控制的为社区服","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":146,"title":147,"thumbnail":148,"summary":149,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":150,"caseTypeCode":151},907,"X 某某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案 —— 晏建强律师、汪艳律师辩护成功获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F303ac30d-2b78-485e-bc70-d6756737a5c8.png","一、案件核心信息 罪名 ：合同 诈骗罪 辩护结果 ：检察院采纳律师意见，对 X 某某作出存疑不起诉决定 案件亮点 ：指定监视居住10个月；精准区分经济合同纠纷与刑事犯罪；成功论证行为人无非法占有目的；检察院认可涉案行为系经营不善导致的违约 ","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":155,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":157,"caseTypeName":158,"caseTypeCode":159},906,"J某某涉嫌故意伤害罪案：晏建强、石大海律师精准辩护获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2a10b4da-900d-4af4-a5f8-12a43edf08b1.png","一、案件核心要素​ 罪名 ： 故意伤害罪 ​ 结果 ：检察院决定不予起诉​ 亮点 ：逮捕羁押6个月，律师精准突破证据链，检察院全额采纳辩护意见​ 焦点 ：现有证据能否证实 J 某某实施故意伤害行为，伤情与行为的因果关系是否成立​ 封面语 ：",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":157,"caseTypeName":158,"caseTypeCode":159},905,"Y涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所晏建强律师为其辩护成功取保","一、案情简介 Y某与被害人因工作纠纷发生争执最后导致矛盾升级，Y某使用 管制 刀具将被害人刺伤。 二、办案经过 委托律师后，李辰君律师、晏建强律师第一时间会见Y某了解案件的具体情况。会见后李辰君律师、晏建强律师马上与办案单位沟通，同时与Y某",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":167,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":150,"caseTypeCode":151},904,"X某涉嫌诈骗罪，卓安律师团队晏建强、陈庆山律师为其辩护，在检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fbbef24c5-b0e3-4272-abff-dc3db3a5d92f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：诈骗罪 结果：取保候审 亮点： 诈骗罪； 单位犯罪 ；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 受害人数量问题；诈骗金额问题；被告人身份认定问题； 封面语： 涉案公司涉嫌虚构办理某银行大额信用卡并骗取服务费，X某被",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":173,"caseTypeCode":174},903,"D某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案（37天）,四川卓安律师事务所吴强律师经过不懈努力，取保候审","案情简介 2017年，当事人D某（W某之父）在绵阳市公共场所无事生非、起哄闹事，造成公共场所秩序严重混乱。 辩护思路 办案律师在接受W某本人委托之后，立即与D某亲属会面，详细了解案件的事实和证据情况并对照法律规定、结合司法实践，确定了辩护思","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":176,"title":177,"thumbnail":178,"summary":179,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":150,"caseTypeCode":151},902,"Y某涉嫌合同诈骗罪，吴健南律师为其辩护，获检察院撤诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002Fcf9e95a6-bb69-4e2d-9843-aa6f28ba3ca3.png","一、案情介绍 2022年12月22日，因涉嫌合同 诈骗罪 ，Y某被云南省某县公安局刑事拘留，2023年9月4日，某县人民检察院以Y某犯 合同诈骗罪 提起 公诉 ，指控Y某在明知某高速路建设项目未取得建设许可、没有项目授权及批文的情况下，不核",{"id":181,"title":182,"thumbnail":183,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},901,"H某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所王子叶、钟灵柔律师为其辩护，获撤销案件处理","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F0eb6e99d-5b5e-4089-83ad-cef6f78e6048.png","一、案情简介 2023年12月，H某经过同事介绍兼职工作认识了主管L某，L某声称是正规公司做债务催收业务。只需要H某提供身份证和完成人脸识别认证手机卡，即可获得报酬。2024年3月22日，H某被某公安分局拘留，2024年4月23日，公安报送",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":188,"summary":189,"caseTypeId":157,"caseTypeName":158,"caseTypeCode":159},900,"C某某故意伤害一案，四川卓安律师事务所团队律师为其辩护检察院最终对其不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F2090fccc-b267-4ada-b9af-f412f55c8115.png","一、【案情简述】 2023年1月22日早晨，C某与Z某发生口角并互相抓扯，后Z某受伤入院治疗。 公安机关以C某涉嫌 故意伤害罪 立案侦查之后，将案件移送检察机关。办案机关查明：“C某持刀在Z某腰部桶了一刀、左手臂捅一刀，左腋窝处被划了两刀、",{"id":191,"title":192,"thumbnail":193,"summary":194,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":195,"caseTypeCode":196},899,"L某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所汪余财律师为其辩护，获检察院不批准逮捕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F0a2593d8-5129-4698-b4e6-44c76cd812f6.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 贩卖毒品罪 结果： 不批准逮捕 亮点： 购买 管制 药品给他服用；检察院采纳律师意见 焦点： 购买一类、二类管制提供给他人服用是否构成贩卖毒品罪；是否获利；是否明知系管制药品 封面语： 小伙L某购买","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":198,"title":199,"thumbnail":200,"summary":201,"caseTypeId":79,"caseTypeName":202,"caseTypeCode":203},898,"H某某涉嫌盗窃罪，四川卓安律师事务所汪余财律师为其代理，获不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F11b6489f-b1bc-4d38-8c46-dc3590e1fd2c.png","案件简介 四川 卓安律师 事务所汪余财律师（接受委托时在四川某律师事务所执业）代理的H某某涉嫌 盗窃罪 一案，H某某等三人系未成年人，起诉意见书指控H某某等三人在凌晨3时许，在某街边看见被害人停在街边的车窗未关，H某某望风，同案H某采取翻进","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",[205,208,211,214,217,220,223,229],{"id":41,"code":144,"name":143,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":174,"name":173,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":151,"name":150,"summary":212,"keywords":213},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":196,"name":195,"summary":215,"keywords":216},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":203,"name":202,"summary":218,"keywords":219},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":221,"keywords":222},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":224,"code":225,"name":226,"summary":227,"keywords":228},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":157,"code":159,"name":158,"summary":230,"keywords":231},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":191,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":234,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":235,"city":236,"caseType":237,"title":238,"thumbnail":239,"content":10,"publishTime":240,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":241,"lawyers":242,"lawyer":246},"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[243],{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[248,251,269,282,295],{"id":191,"createdAt":234,"updatedAt":234,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":235,"city":236,"caseType":237,"title":238,"thumbnail":239,"content":10,"publishTime":240,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":241,"lawyers":249},[250],{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":198,"createdAt":240,"updatedAt":240,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[260,263,268],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":261,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":265,"position":266,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":241,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":245,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":270,"createdAt":271,"updatedAt":271,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":272,"city":273,"caseType":274,"title":275,"thumbnail":276,"content":10,"publishTime":277,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":278,"lawyers":279},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[280],{"id":272,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":278,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":281,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":283,"createdAt":284,"updatedAt":284,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":285,"city":286,"caseType":287,"title":288,"thumbnail":289,"content":10,"publishTime":290,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":291,"lawyers":292},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[293],{"id":285,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":291,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":294,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":296,"createdAt":297,"updatedAt":297,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":298,"city":299,"caseType":300,"title":301,"thumbnail":302,"content":10,"publishTime":303,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":304,"lawyers":305},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[306,309],{"id":298,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":307,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":308,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":310,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":311,"position":244,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":312,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[316,321,326,331,336,341],{"id":43,"createdAt":317,"updatedAt":318,"deleted":34,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":322,"deleted":34,"code":323,"name":324,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":325,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":327,"deleted":34,"code":328,"name":329,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":330,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":332,"deleted":34,"code":333,"name":334,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":335,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":122,"createdAt":337,"updatedAt":338,"deleted":34,"code":339,"name":340,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":224,"createdAt":342,"updatedAt":343,"deleted":34,"code":344,"name":345,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[348,351,354,357],{"value":349,"label":350},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":352,"label":353},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":355,"label":356},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":358,"label":359},"6","全国分所",[361,364,367],{"title":362,"desc":363},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":365,"desc":366},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":368,"desc":369},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":371,"description":13,"keywords":372,"canonical":373,"image":10,"jsonLd":374},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[375],{"@context":376,"@graph":377},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[378,384],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"url":373,"name":7,"inLanguage":381,"publisher":382},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":385,"@id":383,"name":7,"url":373,"logo":386,"image":386,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":381,"address":387,"geo":390,"department":392},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":389},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":391,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[393,398,402,406,410,414],{"@type":394,"@id":395,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":396,"parentOrganization":397},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":399,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":400,"parentOrganization":401},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":403,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":404,"parentOrganization":405},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":407,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":408,"parentOrganization":409},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":411,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":412,"parentOrganization":413},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":383},{"@type":394,"@id":415,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":416,"parentOrganization":417},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":388,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":383},{"entity":419,"seo":431},{"id":420,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":421,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":422,"title":423,"thumbnail":424,"content":425,"publishTime":426,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":427},1524,"2026-11-12 16:57:31",11,"国企财务总监审计费用缺口应对十问十答","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F316c1f2f-9324-4cd1-9135-9f8e55ac3c82.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">国企财务总监离任审计查出项目费用缺口，先不要笼统承认“钱都少在我任上”，也不能只凭“我没拿钱”作出安全判断。未结算、附件缺失、超额付款和实际损失需要分别核对；贪污、受贿与失职等问题的判断条件也不同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">当前最有用的动作，是按问题编号整理业务、职责、审批、付款与去向，对照审计表述提交真实、可核验的反馈。反馈期限取决于审计类型、对象及实际通知，不能把10个工作日套给所有内审。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">以下十问围绕这一项需求展开，结合采购审批失职公开判决及团队金额核对案例，说明怎样整理材料、哪些动作应依法办理，以及审计期间律师咨询与移送审查起诉后辩护的权限区别。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【适用人群】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">• 离任审计发现费用缺口的国企财务负责人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">• 经手付款复核或签批、需核对个人责任的人员。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">• 已收到谈话或移送信息的本人及家属。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、审计说项目少了一大笔钱是不是就算贪污？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不能仅凭费用缺口认定贪污。先问清“少了”的计算方法，再查是否存在利用职务便利非法占有公共财物的事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">刑法第三百八十二条规定的贪污，需要相应主体、职务便利及非法占有等条件。未结算款、缺附件金额与被侵占款不是同一概念。但即使不能认定贪污，真实存在的违规或失职也应另行核对，不能直接归结为无责任。政务处分也须符合事实清楚、证据确凿等要求，不能仅凭缺口作出结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][3]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队X某某案中，律师对实际用于单位公务、必要税费及管理费的部分提出金额审查意见。二审由八年九个月改判六年六个月，涉及多项意见及情节，不能说查明部分公务用途就使全案无罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">取得可合法取得的问题清单，标注期间、合同、账户及金额来源。把同一款项在不同审计表中的对应关系列出，排查重复计算。下一步先请审计人员明确这一项究竟是缺凭证、超付还是实际损失，保留书面反馈。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、我没有拿钱为什么还要查我的刑事风险？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">没有个人获利，不能单独排除失职、滥用职权或共同犯罪风险。关键还包括本人义务、认识、行为和损失联系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">刑法第一百六十八条涉及国有公司、企业工作人员严重不负责任或者滥用职权并造成法定严重后果的情形。不能把一般工作差错都定为犯罪；也不能因款项未进本人账户就忽略明知他人侵占仍帮助等情况，后者须另依共同犯罪规则核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（2022）沪0113刑初705号判决认定，三名管理人员未核实合同及付款金额，导致另一采购人员反复申请付款、侵占钢材并转卖，构成国有公司人员失职罪。该案的定罪理由落在审批失职及其后果，不能据此推定所有付款审核人有罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">找出本人涉事时的岗位职责、授权文件、付款审核要求及所附材料，逐项记录实际核查动作。不要只提交未收款的说明。下一步核对一笔异常付款在当时是否属于本人应当发现的事项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、钱都经过我签字是不是整个项目都由我负责？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">签字需要解释其具体职能，不能自动等同于对项目全部事实和全部损失负责。没有最终决定权，也不当然免除复核义务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">要区分业务验收、预算审核、合同审核、付款复核及最终批准，查清每一栏要求核实什么。经济责任审计规定第三十九条强调按职责和实际作用定责；其中的审计责任分类，不能直接替代刑事责任判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">上海采购审批案的证据包括任免、业务流程、付款审批及专项审计材料。法院并非仅因被告人身为领导就认定犯罪，而是查明其承担审核工作，却没有核查应付款金额。该判断需要具体义务和行为支撑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">保存当时适用的审批流程与完整审批链，核对本人签字时可见的附件和系统权限。会议记录、退回审批及提出异议的原始记录可一并整理。下一步把“我的签字栏要求核查的事项”与“我实际核查的事项”逐项对应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、项目真做了只是附件不齐现在怎么说明？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以依法查找原有业务资料证明实际履行，但不能把缺失凭证补造成当年已经存在的材料。真实业务与手续合规需要分别说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">有实际交付，不等于价格、采购程序、付款及资金用途全部合法。新取得的历史留档副本应说明来源和取得日期，不能倒签合同、虚做验收或开具与真实交易不符的票据。监察法第十八条禁止伪造、隐匿、毁灭证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队X某某案提示，应把具体支出与真实用途对应起来；但该案说明没有公开每笔原始凭据，不能据此宣称只凭一份单位证明即可扣除金额。解释必须接受其他材料核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">按缺失项目列出仍有的合同、交付、验收、物流、邮件及付款记录。需要单位或供应商留档的，通过合法渠道查找，完整保留原有上下文。下一步形成缺失范围及查找线索清单，而非先补写一个完整故事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、账上挂着应收款或者预付款能不能说没有损失？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不能仅凭账上存在债权就认定无损失，也不能把所有挂账直接认定为损失。应核对交易履行和实际回收情况。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对尚待结算的预付款，要查合同条件及对方履约；对逾期债权，要查清偿能力、担保及追收进展。涉及刑事损失的计算，还需结合具体罪名、计算时点和证据，不能用预计回款或未来收益自行冲抵。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">上海采购审批案中，部分合同付款比例超过200%，法院结合重复付款、侵占行为及其他材料认定后果。这个比例是该案事实，不是所有项目适用的入罪界线，更不能把超付金额未经审查就当作损失金额。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">整理合同余额、累计付款、结算单、回款凭证及现有追收材料，标出回收发生的时间。保证、抵押等应核对是否真实有效及实现情况。下一步请具备相应能力的专业人员核对计算口径，保留无法确认的项目。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、领导批准集体开过会我还需要解释什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要解释自己掌握的信息、提出的意见以及履行的独立职责。集体决策和领导同意都不能替代个人履职核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">经济责任审计规定要求结合历史背景、决策过程和实际作用界定责任；按刑法第一百六十八条评价时，还要核对不当履职与法定后果。事后亏损不当然证明决策时违法，会议通过也不当然排除严重失职。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">上海采购审批案说明，审批链存在多人，并不使各自职责消失。反过来，团队X某某案的逐笔审查也提示，对具体行为及金额作区分，比用“大家都同意”概括整个项目更有核实价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">找出当时真实形成的会议纪要、方案、风险提示、反对意见及后续处置记录，注明本人何时收到何种信息。没有书面材料的如实说明，不事后让同事统一补写。下一步列出当时已知风险与后来才出现的变化。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>七、审计快出报告了我应该怎样提交异议？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">按问题编号提交事实、理由和对应附件，并先核实适用期限。不能把所有审计都当作有统一的10个工作日反馈期。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2019年经济责任审计规定第三十二条，对其适用范围内的被审计领导干部及所在单位，规定收到审计组审计报告后10个工作日内书面反馈。财务总监是否属于规定对象要另核；集团内审、中介受托审计应查适用制度和实际通知。正式报告异议与征求意见反馈也有区别。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该规定要求审计组进一步研究核实书面意见，并作必要修改。这是具体程序依据，不意味着任何异议都会被采纳。团队案件中有根据的金额意见，同样依赖具体事实与证据，不能靠笼统否认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">保存通知、征求意见材料及送达日期。反馈写清审计原文、确认事实、争议点、附件索引及待调取线索，保留提交版本和收件记录。下一步先确认谁接收反馈、最迟何时提交，不等全部材料找齐才开始处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>八、我现在把缺口补上是不是就不会移送？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不能保证。合法整改、回收资金可能有意义，但不能自动消除既往行为，也不能以补款换取隐去线索。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">会计调整、民事偿还、追收款项和刑事退赃的性质不同，处理前应核对事实与正式渠道。监察法第三十七条要求审计机关等依法移送相关问题线索。发现可能犯罪的事项，不能约定用账面冲平代替处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队W某案中，当事人套取公款98万余元用于个人开销，并有主动交代、退还款项等情节，最终仍被判贪污罪，有期徒刑三年，缓刑五年。该案没有取得不起诉，说明返还与是否追责须分开判断，缓刑也仍是有罪判决。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">列明拟处理款项的真实性质、金额、付款主体及接收账户，保存每笔款项的来源与凭证。不要在事实未清时签署与真实情况不符的承诺。下一步就正式整改或退缴路径作具体咨询，不向任何人购买“不移送”的保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>九、审计要移送或者监委找我谈话是不是就会留置？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">移送、谈话与留置是不同事项，不能互相直接推导。无个人获利，也不能单独保证不会被留置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察法第二十四条要求涉嫌相关严重职务违法或职务犯罪，已有部分事实及证据，仍有重要问题待查，并具有案情重大复杂、可能逃跑自杀、可能串供毁证或其他妨碍调查等法定情形之一，经依法审批。不能仅凭审计金额判断，也不能把尚未达到定罪标准当作不会采取措施的依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">上海采购审批案体现了失职责任需要多类材料支持；它不是留置概率案例，不能从其最终缓刑结果推测另一当事人的措施风险。留置条件应回到现有事实和程序逐项核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核实联系机关、事由、时间、地点及需带材料，如实整理本人经手事项。家属保存正式通知与合法掌握的必要记录。不要托人打探、联系相关人员对口径。下一步根据实际通知确认当前身份与程序，必要时接受具体法律咨询。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>十、成都律师在审计期间能帮我做哪些具体工作？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以先就职责、款项性质、损失及反馈材料开展咨询，不必等到移送。具体工作依合法材料、程序和委托范围确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">审计期间可协助梳理事实、识别争点和整理反馈；监察调查阶段不能承诺一般性的辩护会见、阅卷权限。进入审查起诉后，依法委托的辩护律师可依刑事诉讼法第四十条阅卷，再提出证据和责任意见。个人与单位的利益冲突，也需在接受委托时核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[5]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队X某某案是在二审核对公务支出等争点后取得改判，不能说其已经证明审计期间咨询能够阻止移送。案例能说明的是具体审查方法，服务积累与个案结果不能混同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">咨询先提供问题清单、岗位职责和一笔争议款的现有资料，并说明送达日期及截止要求。确认律师将先判断什么、还缺哪些材料、下一步可形成何种意见。涉及案卷、内部工作底稿及可反馈内容，应依法并按委托约定处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>工作对照表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">所处阶段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">先核实的事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">律师可评估的工作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">本人或家属配合\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">审计核查或征求意见\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">审计类型、问题口径、反馈期限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">职责及资金分析、事实反馈\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">提供合法材料与收件日期\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">线索拟移送或已移送\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">实际联系、移送信息及本人身份\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">问题性质、材料缺口和程序咨询\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">保存通知，不对口径\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">监察调查\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">正式措施、事由及法定条件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">法律咨询、合法材料整理等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">不把会见阅卷当作当然权限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">移送审查起诉\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">接收机关和程序时间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">依法阅卷、审查证据及责任\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">提供既有线索，确认委托范围\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>材料清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">具体材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">核实用途\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">整理提醒\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">审计文件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">通知、问题清单、征求意见稿\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">确认事项与期限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">保存版本及送达信息\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">职责权限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">任职、授权、岗位和财务制度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">确认当时审核义务\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">使用涉事时有效版本\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">业务和支付\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">合同、验收、完整审批、付款\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">对应履行与资金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">逐笔编号，不只留发票\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">损失和回收\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">计算明细、结算、催收、回款\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">检查范围及时间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">区分预计与已经实现\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"98\">反馈留痕\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">书面意见、附件目录、收件记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">说明已提交哪些事实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"166\">不覆盖原件和原始数据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>误区与避坑\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. “没收钱就没有刑事风险。”还须核对失职及其他行为。先找岗位职责和具体履职材料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. “凭证不齐就是贪污。”业务真实性、程序合规和非法占有需分别查明，既不先全认，也不掩盖缺失。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. “有发票就能证明没问题。”发票不能替代合同履行、价格和付款条件，应与业务及资金对应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">4. “领导批了就与我无关。”应查本人是否仍有复核、报告等义务，保留真实意见和处理记录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">5. “10个工作日适用所有离任审计。”须先核审计类型及对象，再依据适用制度确认期限。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">6. “补平账就能不移送。”正规整改和依法移送是不同事项，不能以假调账或私下承诺代替处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>与律师沟通时核对三件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">当前最急需判断的是哪一笔款、哪一项职责或哪一种损失口径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">哪些结论已有材料支持，哪些还只是解释，缺失资料可从哪里合法查找。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">下一步工作、反馈期限和可沟通内容是什么，哪些事项需要单位授权或其他专业人员参与。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>需要避免的高风险行为\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不得倒签合同、虚做验收、篡改原账、隐匿毁灭记录，或威胁、利诱他人出具虚假说明。不以私下退钱换取他人不作证，不擅自登录已无权使用的单位系统。依法咨询、真实反馈、正常追收及申辩可以进行，应保留过程和依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>服务积累与卓安刑事风控委员会\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：四川卓安律师事务所累计办理职务犯罪案件600余件，为资金用途、职责和证据审查提供实践基础。该数字为律所统计，不是成安律师个人承办量。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会由成安律师领衔，可围绕国企审计风险开展问题分类、职责与资金梳理及真实材料反馈咨询。团队中具有原反贪办案、刑事审判等经历的成员，可结合研讨与质量管理机制复核重要争点。具体服务依实际事实和委托范围确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>相关案例简表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">案例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">本文引用的审查事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">准确结果及引用边界\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">上海采购审批案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">义务、重复付款与损失\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">一审三人均以失职罪判刑并适用缓刑，不预测他案结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">团队X某某案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">公务支出及其他金额、量刑争点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">二审八年九个月改判六年六个月，不是无罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"124\">团队W某案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">个人开销与退还款项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"234\">贪污罪三年，缓刑五年，未取得不起诉\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>咨询与下一步材料准备\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在成都咨询此类问题，可先就审计清单、职责依据和一笔争议款的现有资料，与成安律师团队核对工作范围。涉及个人责任与单位责任同时存在时，先确认委托主体和利益冲突，再决定材料提供及工作安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">眼下可以完成的动作，是把争议最大的一笔款项整理为“业务依据、本人职责、审批、付款、去向”五部分，并附上审计表述和反馈截止要求。材料尚不齐全的部分，如实留下查找线索。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>来源索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">法律与公开案例核验截至2026年11月12日。条号对应各问标注。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1]《中华人民共和国刑法》第25、93、168、382、385条。国家税务总局政策法规库整合文本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2]《中华人民共和国监察法》第18、24、36、37条，2024年修正，2025年6月1日起施行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3]《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》第5条。适用于区分处分与刑事评价。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4]《党政主要领导干部和国有企事业单位主要领导人员经济责任审计规定》第4、31—32、37—42条，2019年公布。适用须核对审计类型及对象。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">审计署全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5]《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第34、39—40、170条，采用已生效文本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[6]上海市宝山区人民法院（2022）沪0113刑初705号刑事判决，2022年10月28日。普通公开裁判案例。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">裁判文书\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队案例依据经授权的X某某贪污、受贿案及W某贪污案脱敏说明，案例结果须结合各案完整资料理解。服务数据与组织信息采用经确认的对外口径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。个案应结合行为时间、身份、程序及证据评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-12 16:57:04",{"id":422,"createdAt":428,"updatedAt":428,"deleted":34,"code":429,"name":430,"icon":35,"sort":157,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":432,"description":433,"keywords":35,"canonical":434,"image":424,"jsonLd":435},"国企财务总监审计费用缺口应对十问十答 - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【核心结论】 国企财务总监离任审计查出项目费用缺口，先不要笼统承认“钱都少在我任上”，也不能只凭“我没拿钱”作出安全判断。未结算、附件缺失、超额付款和实际损失需要分别核对；贪污、受贿与失职等问题的判断条件也不同。 当前最有用的动作，是按问题编号整理业务、职责、审批、付款与去向，对照审计表述提交真实、可核验的反馈。反馈期","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1524",[436],{"@context":376,"@graph":437},[438,445],{"@type":439,"@id":434,"url":434,"headline":423,"description":433,"datePublished":440,"dateModified":441,"author":442,"publisher":443,"articleSection":430,"inLanguage":381,"image":444},"Article","2026-11-12T16:57:04+08:00","2026-11-12T16:57:31+08:00",{"@id":383},{"@id":383},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F12\u002F316c1f2f-9324-4cd1-9135-9f8e55ac3c82.png",{"@type":446,"itemListElement":447},"BreadcrumbList",[448,451,453],{"@type":449,"position":6,"name":450,"item":373},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":449,"position":41,"name":430,"item":452},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":449,"position":38,"name":423,"item":434}]