[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1483":416},{"entity":4,"seo":368},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":199,"caseIntro":228,"latestLawyerNews":229,"lawyerNews":244,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":311,"serviceTags":312,"serviceCategories":313,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":344,"homeStats":345,"serviceProducts":358},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,138,142,147,152,156,161,167,172,177,185,189,195],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},883,"陈某敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师为其辩护，数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fc5d22dff-0601-424e-9410-d6556844ab31.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪 结果：数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元，量刑显著减轻 亮点： 成功争取自首、未遂、初犯等从轻情节认定 精准区分犯罪情节轻微性，避免加重处罚 全面论证适用 缓刑 必要性（法院未",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":129,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},882,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪案,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，检察院做不起诉决定。","案情简介 H公司为被告人Z某的丈夫G某创办，主营服务器出租服务和服务器重启、服务器重装、处理服务器操作系统层面问题等服务。 2021年4月至2022年底，H公司为“天天中彩（手机购彩）”赌博网站提供部分服务器并使用Z某及其母亲Y某的银行卡收",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},881,"Z某涉嫌串通投标罪,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，成功取保候审","【案情简述】 2018年前后，Z某作为某建筑工程有限公司的员工，在涉案业务中负责协助完成招投标中标书的制作、联系其他投标公司等具体工作，通过“打招呼”等方式串通投标。对接业务过程中，在收取业主方费用后再支付给投标公司，赚取两项费用的差价。 ","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":139,"title":140,"thumbnail":10,"summary":141,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},880,"P某涉嫌销售伪劣产品案，石大海律师为其成功辩护，减少刑期18个月","一、案情简介 2021年3月至2022年6月期间，P某以鸭肉干冒充牛肉干通过淘宝店铺对外销售。P某负责淘宝店铺的仓库租赁、原料采购、经营推广、盈利管理，另请他人帮忙打包发货、负责客服。 2022年7月，公安机关现场查获P某打包假冒牛肉干的窝",{"id":143,"title":144,"thumbnail":145,"summary":146,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},879,"W某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，卓安律师事务所石大海、陈庆山律师为其辩护，由一年实刑变更为不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F9710800f-13b3-433c-96d6-26340bdc3451.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果：不起诉 亮点： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪； 犯罪未遂 与犯罪预备；事实不清；检察院采纳律师意见 封面语： W某进入跑分团伙为上游 电信诈骗 集团进行银行取现，涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},878,"Ｍ某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps497.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：检察院采纳辩护人意见，给出适用缓刑的量刑建议，当事人在被逮捕9７天后顺利取保候审。 亮点 ：从犯认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点： 被告人是否为组织者；犯",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},877,"Z某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师竭尽全力，成功为当事人争取从轻处罚","【案件详情】 2024年1月，被告人Z偶然结识了C和大Z，三人通过“飞机”软件和微信“成都卡牌对接群”与昵称为“桃子”“木森Mr”“财源滚滚”“U商”等人取得联系，在“桃子”联系好提供银行账户的卡农人员后，C带人在现场对接卡农取现，并由C检",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},876,"赵某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获得从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fb5cfbaef-5cf4-43b5-b315-f431a4326635.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：法院采纳部分辩护意见，对被告人从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。 亮点 ： 从犯 认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点 ：被告人是否为组织者；犯罪既遂金额认定",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},875,"Y某某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师经过不懈努力，不予逮捕（取保候审）","一、案情简介 Y 某某因涉嫌寻衅滋事而被依法拘留，彼时公安已将案件报捕，局势紧迫，当务之急乃是全力以赴争取检察院不予批准逮捕，为 Y 某某争取更为有利的法律处境。 二、办案过程 在 2024 年 9 月 18 日，秦敏律师用专业精神与高度责","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},874,"L某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获不予批准逮捕的良好结果。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F4be4d806-fab9-42da-bf7f-b0cfda868642.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 违法发放贷款罪 结果： 不批准逮捕 亮点： 银行事业部副总经理L某的行为不构成本罪；检察院采纳律师不予批准逮捕的法律意见。 焦点： 投资业务与贷款业务区分；是否符合违法发放贷款罪的构成要件。 封面语",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},873,"L某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获得不起诉结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fe92011b9-64b7-47dd-9efa-0b058d66cb28.png","案例罪名： 合同诈骗罪 案情简介： 2024年，L某因涉嫌合同诈骗罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，L某作为A有限公司法定代表人，在参与XX平台营销服务活动期间，指使公司员工通过控制多个账号进行虚假交易（刷单），骗取平台优惠补贴共计120余万元。",{"id":178,"title":179,"thumbnail":180,"summary":181,"caseTypeId":182,"caseTypeName":183,"caseTypeCode":184},872,"H某涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，取得公安机关对H某终止侦查，解除取保候审的良好结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F26392a98-fd04-419e-bb1e-846648713b0f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：故意伤害罪 结果：终止侦查、解除取保候审 亮点：伤情成因鉴定、检察院立案监督 焦点：故意伤害致人轻伤、补充鉴定 封面语：H某因故意伤害致Z某轻伤被某区公安分局立案侦查，并采取取保候审的强制措施。四川卓",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":10,"summary":188,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},871,"陈某某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获不起诉结果。","案例罪名： 串通投标罪 案情简介： 2024年，陈某某因涉嫌串通投标罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，陈某某作为w公司法定代表人，在参与“J省某系统”项目期间，存在安排其他公司陪标、事先与招标单位沟通技术参数等行为。陈某某于2024年4月4日被监",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":79,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},870,"F某涉嫌盗窃罪，四川卓安律师事务所母华强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","案情简介 2024年6月4日，F某与通过聊天软件认识的W某开房约会。次日早上，F某将W某放在宾馆电视柜上的黄金手镯拿走，并发送W某的照片进行威胁。6月5日，F某某被刑事拘留。6月16日， 卓安律师 事务所接受F某亲属委托，母华强律师前往看守","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":196,"title":197,"thumbnail":10,"summary":198,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},869,"Z某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,吕灵兮律师经过不懈努力，减少指控事实。","案情简介 公诉 机关指控Z某： 参加黑社会性质组织罪： 2005年至2011年期间，Z某、T某等人进入Z某1控制下的H建设，部分组织成员为组织利益实施多起违法犯罪。 寻衅滋事罪：2011年12月1日20时许，被告人Z某2得知W某在H建设承建",[200,205,208,211,216,219,222,225],{"id":41,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":166,"name":165,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":137,"name":136,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":212,"name":213,"summary":214,"keywords":215},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":194,"name":193,"summary":217,"keywords":218},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":129,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":220,"keywords":221},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":223,"keywords":224},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":182,"code":184,"name":183,"summary":226,"keywords":227},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":230,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":239,"lawyer":243},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[240],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[245,248,267,280,293],{"id":230,"createdAt":231,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":246},[247],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":249,"createdAt":237,"updatedAt":237,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":250,"city":251,"caseType":252,"title":253,"thumbnail":254,"content":10,"publishTime":255,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":256,"lawyers":257},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[258,261,266],{"id":250,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":259,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":260,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":262,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":268,"createdAt":269,"updatedAt":269,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":282,"updatedAt":282,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":283,"city":284,"caseType":285,"title":286,"thumbnail":287,"content":10,"publishTime":288,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":289,"lawyers":290},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[291],{"id":283,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":292,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":294,"createdAt":295,"updatedAt":295,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":296,"city":297,"caseType":298,"title":299,"thumbnail":300,"content":10,"publishTime":301,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":302,"lawyers":303},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[304,307],{"id":296,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":305,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":308,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[314,319,324,329,334,339],{"id":43,"createdAt":315,"updatedAt":316,"deleted":34,"code":317,"name":318,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":323,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":34,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":328,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":34,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":333,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":129,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":34,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":122,"createdAt":340,"updatedAt":341,"deleted":34,"code":342,"name":343,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[346,349,352,355],{"value":347,"label":348},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":350,"label":351},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":353,"label":354},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":356,"label":357},"6","全国分所",[359,362,365],{"title":360,"desc":361},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":363,"desc":364},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":366,"desc":367},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":369,"description":13,"keywords":370,"canonical":371,"image":10,"jsonLd":372},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[373],{"@context":374,"@graph":375},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[376,382],{"@type":377,"@id":378,"url":371,"name":7,"inLanguage":379,"publisher":380},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":383,"@id":381,"name":7,"url":371,"logo":384,"image":384,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":379,"address":385,"geo":388,"department":390},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":387},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":389,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[391,396,400,404,408,412],{"@type":392,"@id":393,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":397,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":401,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":405,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":409,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":413,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":381},{"entity":417,"seo":429},{"id":418,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":419,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":420,"title":421,"thumbnail":422,"content":423,"publishTime":424,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":425},1483,"2026-11-11 16:41:21",11,"公职人员签完监委笔录发现差错十问十答","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F11\u002Fc421232f-1382-4be6-aa77-0fb2ebb3a691.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核心结论\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">公职人员签完监委谈话笔录，发现收款金额、次数、本人行为或事情顺序有误，可以及时反映，提交真实、具体的补充说明并请求核查。签字不使记录失去审查空间，新说明也不会自动替代原笔录。真正影响判断的，是哪句话有错、为什么现在才发现，以及能用什么材料核实。现场发现遗漏、差错，应当提出补充、更正；离场以后，先定位谈话与事项，分清记忆错误和记录不符，再通过承办机关确认的渠道反映。律师可以帮助梳理差错、核对依据和审阅说明，监察调查阶段与移送审查起诉后的会见、阅卷权限需要区分。以下十问围绕这一个问题，帮助本人和家属把待核事实、材料目录与下一步动作列清，不以“统一说法”代替事实核查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">适用人群\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 接受监察谈话后发现钱款、次数或先后顺序说错的公职人员、国企等相关人员。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 认为笔录遗漏自己陈述，或者将转述、推测写成亲历事实的本人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 家人已被调查，手中有相关原始材料，希望依法提供核查线索的家属。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、笔录已经签字捺印 还能提出有错误吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】可以具体反映并请求核查。签字是需要认真对待的确认行为，但不能据此认为任何差错都再也不能说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】实施条例第85条规定笔录核对和遗漏、差错的补充更正，第86条规定自行书写说明。现场可以请求纠正；离场后通过提交补充说明、请求核查等方式处理，不能自己改动原笔录。原记录仍需与新说明、其他证据一并检验。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】刑事审判中，司法解释第93、96条把表述反复的原因、全部供述及证据印证列为审查内容。这能说明签字与后续审查的关系，但不意味着调查阶段提交新说明就必然被采纳。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】记下谈话时间、地点及争议事项，说明错误来自本人表达还是记录。保存合法持有的通知和有关材料；没有笔录副本，应标明记忆局限。下一步向已核实的承办渠道反映具体差错。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、两笔钱记成一笔 金额也不准 应该怎样拆开说？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】按实际交付分别列明日期、来源、金额、去向和用途，再说明原表述混在了哪里。不能只把一个总数换成更小的总数。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】同一笔钱多次转手，不当然是多次收入；有一笔银行入账，也不能排除现金交付。流水只证明一定的资金移动，款项性质及责任金额还需结合其他证据判断。监察法第43条要求全面收集相关证据。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】X某某贪污、受贿案中，团队逐笔核对公务开销、必要税费和管理费等款项，提出核减等意见；二审由八年九个月改判六年六个月。可比之处是每笔款项需要具体核实，不能把改判归于一次笔录更正。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】整理完整交易区间的流水、交易编号和原始凭证，标注哪些记录可能是同笔资金周转。现金事项单列，写清依据，不补造收据。下一步请律师核对是否遗漏、重复计算或混淆性质。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、笔录把办事和收钱的顺序写反了 为什么要单独说明？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】应单独核对，因为顺序可能影响对请托、履职和利益联系的理解。更正顺序不等于当然排除受贿等风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】把接到请托、实际处理事项、收付款、本人知情分别列成节点。本人亲历的事实与听别人讲的情况分开，避免把后来知道的事情写成当时就知道。实施条例第90条要求对具体辩解如实记录、认真查核。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】司法解释第93条要求检验辩解与其他证据的矛盾能否合理解释。所谓顺序有误，应能对应具体日期、沟通或审批材料；仅说“我印象不是这样”还需要进一步核实。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】列出审批日期、付款日期、当时邮件或聊天的形成时间，并保留上下文。单位档案列明保管处，不擅自取走。下一步先标出已经确认和仍不确定的节点，再准备补充说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、我记得自己没这样说 能要求查谈话录像吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】可以提出具体核查请求。是否有录像、怎样调取、由谁核查，要看谈话性质与适用程序，家属不当然有权拿到副本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】实施条例第60条规定讯问和重要谈话、询问等取证工作同步录音录像，并要求笔录与音视频相符；第81条规定对涉嫌严重职务违法的被调查人谈话应全程同步录音录像。不能据此推定所有普通谈话均有录像。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】司法解释第93条也允许必要时结合讯问录音录像等审查供述。这说明核查原始记录的用途是检验具体争议，不能把“有人签过字”或“应有录像”直接当作内容准确的证明。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】写清哪一次谈话、哪项提问、本人记得怎样回答及记录哪里不符。无法确定逐字原话时如实标明。下一步请求承办机关保存、核查对应时段的资料，由律师评估后续程序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、我当时紧张 现在才想起来 会不会被当成翻供？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】可能被追问前后为何不同，重点是如实解释并提供核查依据。仅以紧张作笼统解释，通常还不足以判断哪次表述准确。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】说明当时混淆了什么、何时看到何种材料才发现问题。司法解释第96条规定，庭审翻供不能合理解释或与全案证据矛盾，而原供述有其他证据印证时，可以采信原供述。该规则不是对真实差错说明的禁止。[4]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】X某某案的账目审查体现了用具体材料验证款项用途的方法。对记忆差错同样如此：新说法应找到可检查的依据；案例没有证明单凭改变陈述就能取得更轻结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】保存发现差错所依据的流水、凭证或其他真实记录，注明取得及发现时间。没有新材料的，也如实写出记忆恢复经过和待查线索。下一步形成前后差异及原因的对照，不编造病情或受压经过。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、补充说明到底写哪些内容 交给谁才合适？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】写清对应记录、准确情况、发现经过、材料依据和具体请求，通过承办机关确认的渠道提交。写得可核查，比使用某种固定文书名称更重要。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】适用第86条时，说明逐页签名、捺指印，末页写明日期，修改处捺指印，由二名调查人员接收并记明日期、签名。一般问题线索处置谈话后书面说明等情形，还应核对第79条的相应要求和告知事项。[1]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】现行记录规则分别处理现场核对、自书说明和一般谈话后的书面说明，体现了程序与材料形式需要匹配。没有统一规定要求所有事后差错都必须在“七天内”提出，也不应因此拖延反映。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】准备说明同版副本及附件目录，核实收件机关、接收人和提交方式，保存合法取得的接收或邮寄记录。无笔录副本不猜原文。下一步核对材料是否送达，以及哪些事项仍需补核。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>七、材料还没找齐 是先反映还是等查清再说？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】可以先反映已经发现的具体差错，列明未核部分和材料线索，再补充依据。不要为了等所有材料齐全而继续确认已知错误。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】先交说明不等于应当接受一个暂定数字。已确认、本人回忆及待核内容应分别标注；依法要求提供的材料仍须按要求处理。存在期限或客观困难，应及时说明并请求合理安排，不能自行认定延期已经获准。[1][2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】X某某案之所以能对款项用途提出具体意见，与逐笔账目及用途审查有关。对现阶段暂时缺失的凭证，合理做法是给出保管线索，请求核实，不能用当事人的概括解释替代原始依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】先列“已确认事项、待核事项、材料保管处、拟补核方式”。单位档案留在合法保管渠道内，个人合法持有的记录保留原始载体。下一步提交确定部分，并明确后续补充事项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>八、提出更正会不会被留置 还会不会有其他风险？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】依法说明真实差错本身，不是单独的留置条件。风险来自实际问题及相关证据，伪造材料、串通说法等错误应对也可能增加风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】监察法第24条要求涉嫌严重职务违法或者职务犯罪、已掌握部分事实证据、仍有重要问题需查，并具有法定情形、经依法审批。仅凭“改了金额”或“又交说明”无法判断是否留置；不能承诺更正后一定安全。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】监察法第43条要求查清有无违法犯罪及情节轻重，第72条对虚假情况、串供及伪造、隐匿、毁灭证据等行为设有责任规定。提出有依据的差错说明与制造新事实，应当区别对待。[2]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】把款项来由、本人履职、实际支配和知情情况交律师评估，保留原材料。不要为了使新旧说法一致联系相关人对答案。下一步判断差错影响的是数字、认识，还是事实性质。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>九、家人已经被留置 家属能替他交补充说明吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】家属可以依法提供自己掌握的真实材料和核查线索；不能在未见原记录、未亲历谈话时，替本人确认说过什么或改写其陈述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】先说明材料来源、自己知道的范围和请求核查的事项。监察调查中，家属咨询律师不产生律师当然会见留置人员或阅卷的权限。具体存在侵害合法权益行为时，可由律师结合监察法第69条评估申诉路径。[2][5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】X某某案中，具体款项用途通过账目及相关证据核对；这一方法提示家属将亲历交易和原始材料提供清楚。该案没有证明家属可以代替本人作供述，也不能推定其二审结果适用于留置阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人及家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】家属单列自己亲历事项、合法持有的凭证及收到的通知，注明哪些只是转述。单位材料仅提供合法线索。下一步向核实过的渠道提交核查线索，避免替本人签署事实陈述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>十、成都有律师能帮助核对笔录差错吗 现在能做什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心判断】可以咨询提供职务犯罪风控和危机应对服务的律师。当前先解决事实核对、说明审阅和核查请求，具体工作依材料、程序及委托确定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【法律要件与责任边界】律师法第31条规定法律咨询和非诉讼服务等业务，第41条规定保密义务。监察调查阶段不能承诺会见、阅卷或陪同讯问；移送审查起诉后，辩护律师依法办理委托、会见、阅卷，再系统审查历次记录及证据。[3][5]\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【案例与专业书籍论据】由成安律师领衔的卓安刑事风控委员会提供风险识别和危机应对支持；X某某案所展示的逐笔账目审查，与本文金额及用途核对有对应关系。既往办案结果不构成更正成功或不被留置的保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【本人应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】咨询时先提供争议事项表、能合法提供的现有依据和程序通知，告知保密要求。核对需补的材料、拟提交内容及反馈安排。下一步通过四川卓安律师事务所官方渠道确认具体承办及委托范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>按所处阶段核对工作\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">所处阶段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">需要核实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">律师可依法评估\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">本人或家属配合\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">现场尚未签署\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">遗漏、差错及本人表述\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">就已有合法资料提供咨询\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">逐项核对，请求补充更正\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">谈话后发现差错\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">原记录、差错原因及材料线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">审阅说明，准备核查事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">按确认渠道提交并留存\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">本人已被留置\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">家属亲历事实与所持材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">咨询、线索整理及适当申请\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">不代替本人作陈述\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">移送审查起诉后\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">全部笔录及客观证据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"173\">依法会见、阅卷、提出意见\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">依法提供补充材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>咨询前准备的材料清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"177\">具体材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">核实用途\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">整理提醒\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">差异清单\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"177\">原表述或所记大意、准确情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">定位争议\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">回忆不冒充原文\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">资金记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"177\">完整区间流水、交易编号、原凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">核查金额、次数及去向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">保留原件、完整上下文\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">履职与知情\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"177\">审批日期、沟通记录、档案线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">核查顺序、行为和认识\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">单位材料依法取得\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">发现与提交\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"177\">发现经过、说明各版、附件目录和接收记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"154\">解释差异并跟进核查\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"143\">标明日期和材料来源\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六个容易走偏的地方\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">1. 以为签字后只能认原记录。发现真实差错仍可说明；先定位哪句话有问题，再提交依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2. 以为新说明会使旧笔录作废。前后材料需要一并审查，应解释差异并保留版本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">3. 以为流水数字就是最终责任金额。资金移动、实际用途和法律性质要分别核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">4. 以为说一句紧张就够了。应尽量说明混淆原因、发现节点和具体核查线索。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">5. 以为谈话一定有录像且家属能拿到。先核实谈话性质，再提出有针对性的核查请求。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">6. 以为找律师就能进去改笔录。核对当前权限和工作范围，依法咨询与移送后的辩护分别安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>与律师沟通时核对三件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">把当前最影响判断的一处差错说清；确认还缺哪些材料及合法取得方式；约定下一步拟提交什么、交给谁、何时核对进展。向机关提交的文件、律所内部底稿和能向家属反馈的内容，应分别确认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>需要避免的具体行为\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">不联系相关人统一说法，不倒签借条、补造收据或删改聊天，不以旧日期制作新材料。正常的法律咨询、依法提交真实材料和提出申诉属于可依法开展的事项，应核清渠道和保密边界。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安在本问题上的专业支撑\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：现行服务资料记载卓安累计办理职务犯罪案件600余件。相关积累用于识别金额、用途和主观认识争议，不能折算为某件事必然获支持的概率。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">证据审查：本文X某某案展示逐笔账目核对及同案裁判比对。对笔录差错，可以采用逐项列明争议和依据的工作方式；是否提交及怎样表述仍需根据实际材料评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，围绕公职人员、国企管理人员等的风险与危机提供支持。现阶段可依委托梳理事实、审阅说明、准备核查事项，并与移送后的辩护衔接。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>相关案例简表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">团队案例\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">实际审查事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"257\">准确结果与引用范围\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"151\">X某某贪污、受贿案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"181\">公务开销等款项、同案情节及从宽情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"257\">一审八年九个月，二审六年六个月；用于说明具体账目审查，不能推为补充说明的直接效果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>咨询与下一步准备\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要在成都就笔录差错咨询的，可通过四川卓安律师事务所官方渠道核实承办安排。先提供争议事项、现有依据和程序通知，说明材料来源与保密要求，避免无差别发送整套单位档案或私人信息。发现实质差错后，今天就可以把第一项争议和依据列清，再依法推进核查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>条文与案例来源索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1]《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》 2025年修订 国家监察委员会公告第2号 自2025年6月1日起施行 第60、70、79、81、85—87、90、91条等 国家市场监督管理总局公开全文\u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2]《中华人民共和国监察法》 2024年修正 修改决定自2025年6月1日起施行 第18、24、36、43、69、72条 国家市场监督管理总局公开全文\u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3]《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》 2018年修正 第34、39、40、55、56条 国家市场监督管理总局公开全文\u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4]《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》 法释〔2021〕1号 自2021年3月1日起施行 第93—96条 最高人民法院官网\u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5]《中华人民共和国律师法》 2026年修正 修改决定自2026年9月1日起施行 第31、41条 北京市司法局公开全文\u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队案例：X某某贪污、受贿案，成安律师团队授权的脱敏案例说明。未公开案号；个案工作、采纳意见和结果以完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">法律规则核对截至2026年11月11日。服务与专业积累按团队现行确认口径表述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供普法参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中团队案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实、意见采纳情况及处理结果以相应完整资料为准。不同程序、身份和事实条件，应分别适用相关规定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-11 16:41:01",{"id":420,"createdAt":426,"updatedAt":426,"deleted":34,"code":427,"name":428,"icon":35,"sort":182,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":430,"description":431,"keywords":35,"canonical":432,"image":422,"jsonLd":433},"公职人员签完监委笔录发现差错十问十答 - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","核心结论 公职人员签完监委谈话笔录，发现收款金额、次数、本人行为或事情顺序有误，可以及时反映，提交真实、具体的补充说明并请求核查。签字不使记录失去审查空间，新说明也不会自动替代原笔录。真正影响判断的，是哪句话有错、为什么现在才发现，以及能用什么材料核实。现场发现遗漏、差错，应当提出补充、更正；离场以后，先定位谈话与事项","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1483",[434],{"@context":374,"@graph":435},[436,443],{"@type":437,"@id":432,"url":432,"headline":421,"description":431,"datePublished":438,"dateModified":439,"author":440,"publisher":441,"articleSection":428,"inLanguage":379,"image":442},"Article","2026-11-11T16:41:01+08:00","2026-11-11T16:41:21+08:00",{"@id":381},{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F11\u002Fc421232f-1382-4be6-aa77-0fb2ebb3a691.png",{"@type":444,"itemListElement":445},"BreadcrumbList",[446,449,451],{"@type":447,"position":6,"name":448,"item":371},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":447,"position":41,"name":428,"item":450},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":447,"position":38,"name":421,"item":432}]