[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1455":416},{"entity":4,"seo":368},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":199,"caseIntro":228,"latestLawyerNews":229,"lawyerNews":244,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":311,"serviceTags":312,"serviceCategories":313,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":344,"homeStats":345,"serviceProducts":358},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,138,142,147,152,156,161,167,172,177,185,189,195],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},883,"陈某敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师为其辩护，数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fc5d22dff-0601-424e-9410-d6556844ab31.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪 结果：数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元，量刑显著减轻 亮点： 成功争取自首、未遂、初犯等从轻情节认定 精准区分犯罪情节轻微性，避免加重处罚 全面论证适用 缓刑 必要性（法院未",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":129,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},882,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪案,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，检察院做不起诉决定。","案情简介 H公司为被告人Z某的丈夫G某创办，主营服务器出租服务和服务器重启、服务器重装、处理服务器操作系统层面问题等服务。 2021年4月至2022年底，H公司为“天天中彩（手机购彩）”赌博网站提供部分服务器并使用Z某及其母亲Y某的银行卡收",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},881,"Z某涉嫌串通投标罪,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，成功取保候审","【案情简述】 2018年前后，Z某作为某建筑工程有限公司的员工，在涉案业务中负责协助完成招投标中标书的制作、联系其他投标公司等具体工作，通过“打招呼”等方式串通投标。对接业务过程中，在收取业主方费用后再支付给投标公司，赚取两项费用的差价。 ","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":139,"title":140,"thumbnail":10,"summary":141,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},880,"P某涉嫌销售伪劣产品案，石大海律师为其成功辩护，减少刑期18个月","一、案情简介 2021年3月至2022年6月期间，P某以鸭肉干冒充牛肉干通过淘宝店铺对外销售。P某负责淘宝店铺的仓库租赁、原料采购、经营推广、盈利管理，另请他人帮忙打包发货、负责客服。 2022年7月，公安机关现场查获P某打包假冒牛肉干的窝",{"id":143,"title":144,"thumbnail":145,"summary":146,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},879,"W某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，卓安律师事务所石大海、陈庆山律师为其辩护，由一年实刑变更为不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F9710800f-13b3-433c-96d6-26340bdc3451.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果：不起诉 亮点： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪； 犯罪未遂 与犯罪预备；事实不清；检察院采纳律师意见 封面语： W某进入跑分团伙为上游 电信诈骗 集团进行银行取现，涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},878,"Ｍ某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps497.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：检察院采纳辩护人意见，给出适用缓刑的量刑建议，当事人在被逮捕9７天后顺利取保候审。 亮点 ：从犯认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点： 被告人是否为组织者；犯",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},877,"Z某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师竭尽全力，成功为当事人争取从轻处罚","【案件详情】 2024年1月，被告人Z偶然结识了C和大Z，三人通过“飞机”软件和微信“成都卡牌对接群”与昵称为“桃子”“木森Mr”“财源滚滚”“U商”等人取得联系，在“桃子”联系好提供银行账户的卡农人员后，C带人在现场对接卡农取现，并由C检",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},876,"赵某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获得从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fb5cfbaef-5cf4-43b5-b315-f431a4326635.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：法院采纳部分辩护意见，对被告人从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。 亮点 ： 从犯 认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点 ：被告人是否为组织者；犯罪既遂金额认定",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},875,"Y某某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师经过不懈努力，不予逮捕（取保候审）","一、案情简介 Y 某某因涉嫌寻衅滋事而被依法拘留，彼时公安已将案件报捕，局势紧迫，当务之急乃是全力以赴争取检察院不予批准逮捕，为 Y 某某争取更为有利的法律处境。 二、办案过程 在 2024 年 9 月 18 日，秦敏律师用专业精神与高度责","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},874,"L某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获不予批准逮捕的良好结果。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F4be4d806-fab9-42da-bf7f-b0cfda868642.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 违法发放贷款罪 结果： 不批准逮捕 亮点： 银行事业部副总经理L某的行为不构成本罪；检察院采纳律师不予批准逮捕的法律意见。 焦点： 投资业务与贷款业务区分；是否符合违法发放贷款罪的构成要件。 封面语",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},873,"L某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获得不起诉结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fe92011b9-64b7-47dd-9efa-0b058d66cb28.png","案例罪名： 合同诈骗罪 案情简介： 2024年，L某因涉嫌合同诈骗罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，L某作为A有限公司法定代表人，在参与XX平台营销服务活动期间，指使公司员工通过控制多个账号进行虚假交易（刷单），骗取平台优惠补贴共计120余万元。",{"id":178,"title":179,"thumbnail":180,"summary":181,"caseTypeId":182,"caseTypeName":183,"caseTypeCode":184},872,"H某涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，取得公安机关对H某终止侦查，解除取保候审的良好结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F26392a98-fd04-419e-bb1e-846648713b0f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：故意伤害罪 结果：终止侦查、解除取保候审 亮点：伤情成因鉴定、检察院立案监督 焦点：故意伤害致人轻伤、补充鉴定 封面语：H某因故意伤害致Z某轻伤被某区公安分局立案侦查，并采取取保候审的强制措施。四川卓",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":10,"summary":188,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},871,"陈某某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获不起诉结果。","案例罪名： 串通投标罪 案情简介： 2024年，陈某某因涉嫌串通投标罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，陈某某作为w公司法定代表人，在参与“J省某系统”项目期间，存在安排其他公司陪标、事先与招标单位沟通技术参数等行为。陈某某于2024年4月4日被监",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":79,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},870,"F某涉嫌盗窃罪，四川卓安律师事务所母华强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","案情简介 2024年6月4日，F某与通过聊天软件认识的W某开房约会。次日早上，F某将W某放在宾馆电视柜上的黄金手镯拿走，并发送W某的照片进行威胁。6月5日，F某某被刑事拘留。6月16日， 卓安律师 事务所接受F某亲属委托，母华强律师前往看守","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":196,"title":197,"thumbnail":10,"summary":198,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},869,"Z某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,吕灵兮律师经过不懈努力，减少指控事实。","案情简介 公诉 机关指控Z某： 参加黑社会性质组织罪： 2005年至2011年期间，Z某、T某等人进入Z某1控制下的H建设，部分组织成员为组织利益实施多起违法犯罪。 寻衅滋事罪：2011年12月1日20时许，被告人Z某2得知W某在H建设承建",[200,205,208,211,216,219,222,225],{"id":41,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":166,"name":165,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":137,"name":136,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":212,"name":213,"summary":214,"keywords":215},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":194,"name":193,"summary":217,"keywords":218},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":129,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":220,"keywords":221},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":223,"keywords":224},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":182,"code":184,"name":183,"summary":226,"keywords":227},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":230,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":239,"lawyer":243},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[240],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[245,248,267,280,293],{"id":230,"createdAt":231,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":246},[247],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":249,"createdAt":237,"updatedAt":237,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":250,"city":251,"caseType":252,"title":253,"thumbnail":254,"content":10,"publishTime":255,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":256,"lawyers":257},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[258,261,266],{"id":250,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":259,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":260,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":262,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":268,"createdAt":269,"updatedAt":269,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":282,"updatedAt":282,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":283,"city":284,"caseType":285,"title":286,"thumbnail":287,"content":10,"publishTime":288,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":289,"lawyers":290},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[291],{"id":283,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":292,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":294,"createdAt":295,"updatedAt":295,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":296,"city":297,"caseType":298,"title":299,"thumbnail":300,"content":10,"publishTime":301,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":302,"lawyers":303},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[304,307],{"id":296,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":305,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":308,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[314,319,324,329,334,339],{"id":43,"createdAt":315,"updatedAt":316,"deleted":34,"code":317,"name":318,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":323,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":34,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":328,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":34,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":333,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":129,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":34,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":122,"createdAt":340,"updatedAt":341,"deleted":34,"code":342,"name":343,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[346,349,352,355],{"value":347,"label":348},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":350,"label":351},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":353,"label":354},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":356,"label":357},"6","全国分所",[359,362,365],{"title":360,"desc":361},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":363,"desc":364},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":366,"desc":367},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":369,"description":13,"keywords":370,"canonical":371,"image":10,"jsonLd":372},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[373],{"@context":374,"@graph":375},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[376,382],{"@type":377,"@id":378,"url":371,"name":7,"inLanguage":379,"publisher":380},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":383,"@id":381,"name":7,"url":371,"logo":384,"image":384,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":379,"address":385,"geo":388,"department":390},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":387},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":389,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[391,396,400,404,408,412],{"@type":392,"@id":393,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":397,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":401,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":405,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":409,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":413,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":381},{"entity":417,"seo":429},{"id":418,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":419,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":420,"title":421,"thumbnail":422,"content":423,"publishTime":424,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":425},1455,"2026-11-10 22:17:43",11,"公职人员被告知认了就能回家， 没收钱该怎么办？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff58238b4-6e5e-48b1-9421-b2f743e9fffa.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">接受监委谈话时，如果被告知“认了就能回家，不认连家属一起查”，对不属实的收钱事实，仍应如实说明。能否离场、是否留置、家属是否涉案，各有事实和程序条件，口头许诺不能替代依法决定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现行监察规范明确禁止非法取证；法院公开案例也表明，严重威胁取得的供述存在依法排除的空间，但必须核查具体过程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">一句“要查家属”，是在说明真实线索，还是以侵害家属合法权益相要挟？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">已经签下不准确的笔录，怎样指出差错并留下核查依据？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">没有录音录像在手，本人和家属还能准备哪些线索？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">眼前可做的是把争议事实与施压经过分别写清，依法请求核查；既不承认不存在的事实，也不编造被施压经历。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、没有收过的钱，不能为了早点回家先认下来\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">是否收钱要靠事实和证据判断。把不存在的事情先承认下来，可能形成新的不利材料；离场、留置和家属调查都不能靠这份承认作交换。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“我是一名公职人员，对方让我承认收了某老板的钱，说认了就能回去，否则连妻子的公司一起查。可这笔钱我确实没有收，现在该怎么办？”这类处境的难点，是本人同时担心自己不能回家、家属受到牵连，容易把尽快结束谈话放在核对事实之前。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要分开判断三件事：这笔钱到底有没有收；谈话中是否存在违法施压；家属的经营或资金是否有独立风险。证明其中一件，并不能自动得出另外两件的结论。例如，家属确有需要核查的交易，不代表本人就收了被指向的那笔钱；本人认为受到威胁，也不代表其他真实问题可以不说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如实回答包括明确否认不存在的事实、讲清自己知道的范围，以及说明哪些细节暂时记不准。对已经确认的行为应如实说明；对缺少记忆或需要调账核实的事项，不要填入猜测的时间、金额和交付方式。法律上的受贿评价，还要核查职务便利、财物收受、为他人谋利等相关事实，不能把一句“认了吧”当成完整证明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">会不会被留置，同样不能从一句话预测。《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条要求同时审查涉嫌问题、已掌握事实证据、继续调查的必要性，以及法定情形和审批程序。承认不实事实不保证回家，如实提出异议也不能单独成为留置的理由。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"132\">谈话中出现的情形\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">需要判断的区别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">眼前可以做什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"132\">依法说明如实供述可以从宽\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">政策说明不等于承诺具体结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">如实说明实际行为，核对从宽条件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"132\">说明家属某项交易需要核查\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">可能属于依法核查关联线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">讲清本人知道什么，家属另核真实交易\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"132\">以违法抓捕家属逼迫承认\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"226\">涉及取证合法性，应核查严重程度和影响\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">明确事实异议，记录具体言行并依法反映\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、是否属于违法威胁，要把完整经过放回现行规则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">严禁非法取证，与某份供述能否依法排除，是相互关联而需分别审查的问题。不能只听见“查家属”三个字就下结论，也不能以“只是谈话方法”掩盖严重侵权。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）判断要看威胁内容、程度及对陈述的影响\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十三条禁止以暴力、威胁、引诱、欺骗及其他非法方式取证，第三十六条规定非法取得的证据依法排除。调查中既要收集证明有问题的材料，也要收集证明没有问题、情节较轻的材料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">2025年修订的《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第七十一条至第七十三条进一步规定了禁止的方法、应排除的言词证据以及调查核实机制。其中，威胁取证的排除标准，涉及以暴力或者严重损害本人及其近亲属合法权益相威胁，使人遭受难以忍受的痛苦、违背意愿作出陈述等条件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">因此，依法指出家属可能涉案并开展核查，与以无依据的抓捕或其他违法侵权作条件，逼迫本人承认指定事实，性质不同。需要核实原话、前后问题、家属实际遭遇、本人状态，以及供述是在何种情况下改变的。即使某种做法尚不满足排除供述的条件，也仍可依其具体违法情形反映、请求纠正。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“认了就放人”也要核对上下文。依法解释从宽政策，与把具体人身自由结果作为迫使不实承认的交换条件，不能混同。口头说法既不能保证措施解除，也不能代替检察机关、人民法院之后的依法判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）郑某文案说明了为什么不能只写“我受了威胁”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">最高人民法院网站2017年8月10日刊载的《广州中院深入开展“三项规程”改革试点工作》明确介绍，广州市中级人民法院曾排除以威胁方法收集的郑某文供述，该案为《刑事审判参考》收录案例。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[7]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">山东法院网刊载的相关专业文章进一步介绍：案件涉及以查处女婿公司、抓捕女儿女婿相威胁，且亲属实际被长时间限制自由。审查并非停留于被告人的一句指责，而是结合亲属经历、先后供述及威胁影响是否持续进行判断；二审对威胁影响下相关供述的排除予以确认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[8]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这个案例能够说明，精神上的严重威胁也需要被审查，未发生殴打不能直接排除违法取证的可能。它不能说明提到家属就违法，也不能说明排除一份供述后全案必然无罪。案例发生于监察体制改革前，当前监委调查应先适用现行监察规范，移送后再与刑事诉讼规则衔接。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、团队案例中的早期帮助，落在真实事实和具体材料上\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">调查早期可以寻求法律咨询。此时的价值，是核清事实、避免错误应对并准备适当材料；不能把后续缓刑等结果说成认了某句话就可以获得的交换。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的Z某挪用公款案中，当事人系某服务中心窗口工作人员，涉及截留办事人员缴纳的现金66万余元。团队在“走读式”调查早期提供法律帮助，后续围绕案发前已全部归还相关款项、自愿认罪认罚等事实提出意见，并在检察环节提交适用缓刑的意见。最终，法院判处有期徒刑一年六个月，缓刑二年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[9]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">对本文场景，这个案例的参考点是：早期咨询与后续辩护可以依各阶段衔接。涉及真实发生的款项，要核对收取、用途和归还凭证；涉及争议事项，要指出争议对象和依据。不能因为担心家属就一概承认，也不能为了否认一笔争议款，把实际存在的其他问题一起否认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">归还凭证在该案中对应的是确有事实基础的款项和相应处理情节。它不支持让否认收钱的人先按争议金额付款，以换取口头释放承诺；具体财物处置应核对对象、依据和合法手续。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这份案例材料没有记载违法施压或非法证据排除的结果，不能把它包装成“排除口供后获缓刑”的业绩。它也不能证明早期咨询单独决定了最终判决，更不能把个案刑期照搬到其他案件。是否提出非法取证申诉，应另以当事人实际遭遇和可核实线索为基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、受到异常施压后，重点核清四项事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">真正有助于核查的，是哪一次谈话、哪笔事实、什么手段、造成什么影响。本人、家属和律师应围绕这些信息组织材料，避免只作抽象评价。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）审查要点一 先确定施压针对哪一笔事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">把争议缩小到具体事项：谁被说成送钱人，涉及多少金额，何时何地交付，本人被要求承认的是收到钱、知道来源，还是答应办事。对每一项写清确认、否认或暂需核实的理由，不把“记不清准确日期”误写成“否认发生过任何往来”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">再与合法持有的银行记录、行程、原始聊天及履职材料核对。没有转账记录不能直接排除现金交付，一张流水也不能单独证明款项就是受贿。材料的用途是检验具体说法，不能用一项表象替代完整事实判断。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第六十七条要求全面客观收证，并明确仅有本人陈述或者供述、没有其他证据，不能认定案件事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）审查要点二 把威胁内容和产生的影响对应起来\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">记录谈话日期、地点、人员姓名或可识别特征，区分能够记准的原话与事后概括。写明话是在什么问题之后出现、是否反复说、家属是否随后受到实际措施，以及本人何时开始作出与此前不同的陈述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如果出现心悸、失眠、用药中断或其他不适，应写具体表现、起止时间和处置经过，保存合法取得的诊疗记录。病历可以帮助核查身体状态，未必能够单独证明威胁内容；没有外伤，也不能直接否定精神威胁。应结合《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第七十二条的条件整体判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（三）审查要点三 核对笔录和录音录像各自记载了什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">签名前应逐项核对钱数、主语、次数、知情时间及事实先后。遗漏了本人否认、核实请求或身体不适的，应当具体提出补充、更正；核对无误后再按规定签名、捺指印。仅仅拒绝签名，不会自动消除笔录的证明作用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">已经签字后发现实质差错，可及时提交对应说明，写清原记载、实际情况、更正原因和核实依据，并保留提交记录。纠正错记与否认曾经作出的陈述应当区分：如果当时确因压力承认了不实事实，应如实说明当时怎样回答、为什么不真实，不能把自己说过的话一概描述成记录人员捏造。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">讯问依法全程同步录音录像；重要谈话等取证工作也有相应要求，不能将所有口头交流都概括成必有完整录像。可以提出保存、核查具体时段资料的请求，说明争议发生在正式问答中还是前后间隙；本人没有录像在手，不妨碍提供具体线索，但也不意味着本人或家属当然可以取得录像副本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（四）审查要点四 对先后陈述逐次核查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">有的人担心“已经说了几遍，后面就只能照着说”。如果发现陈述不真实，应说明每次陈述的形成原因，列出何时受到什么影响、是否更换人员、是否告知权利及影响是否延续。不能为保持一致继续补充不存在的交付细节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《刑事审判参考》郑某文案提示，应具体审查威胁影响下的后续陈述。当前《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》第一百二十四条对刑讯逼供后重复性供述另有规则，适用对象和例外有明确条件，不能直接扩大为所有威胁、许诺情形下一律排除全部后续供述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[4][8]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、本人和家属现在怎样依法推进\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先准确说明事实、保存已有线索，再按所处程序提出有对象的请求。家属可以合法咨询、提交材料和申诉，不需要靠打听案情或组织他人统一说法帮助当事人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）本人在场时 把具体异议和健康需要说清\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">围绕被问事项如实陈述，请求将自己的否认、辩解及核实线索准确记入笔录。确实无法记准的内容，说明记忆边界和可能核查的材料。身体不适影响理解、表达或阅读笔录的，及时说明症状，请求安排休息、服药或医疗处理，不要为尽快结束而勉强确认未核对的文字。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在能够合法反映时，分别形成争议事实说明和施压经过记录，注明制作日期及信息来源。后续找到新材料，可以另作补充并保留先前版本，不倒签日期，不把后来推测写成当时亲历。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）家属手上只有转述时 先标清信息从哪里来\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可保存实际收到的通知、陪送交接资料、本人合法告知的情况和诊疗记录。没有亲历谈话，应注明是何时、通过什么方式获知，不以第一人称写“调查人员对我说”。对家属企业另建交易时间线，整理合法取得的合同、履约和收付款材料，由律师评估与本人职务行为的关联，不补造合同，也不转移资金制造权属。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属不必等到拿到完整案卷才咨询。首次评估可先提供一页经过、现有文书和材料目录；单位档案或涉及秘密的资料，应先核实能否提供及合法取得路径，避免无差别转发。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（三）选择救济路径时 核对受理机关和期限\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察调查期间，针对非法取证，可依《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第七十三条提出具体控告、举报，请求受理审核并核查相关记录。对于符合《中华人民共和国监察法》第六十九条情形的侵权行为，被调查人及其近亲属、利害关系人可以向该监察机关申诉。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">第六十九条申诉的处理期限，从受理之日起计算，为一个月；对处理决定不服，可以在收到决定之日起一个月内向上一级监察机关申请复查，上一级应在收到复查申请之日起二个月内作出决定。应分别保留提交、受理、送达记录，不能把这组期限当成所有控告、举报一概适用的统一答复期限。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">移送审查起诉后，受委托的辩护律师可依法会见、阅卷，核对争议笔录及现有取证资料，提出审查合法性、调取录音录像等意见。审判中申请排除非法证据，需要提供人员、时间、地点、方式、内容等线索或材料；依法进入合法性调查后，由公诉机关证明取证合法性。排除某份证据后，仍须综合其余证据判断案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[3][4][5]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（四）在成都咨询时 把委托工作落到本次争议\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以向提供职务犯罪危机应对服务的律师咨询，先核对目前是谈话、监察调查还是已经移送，再确定要解决的事项。《中华人民共和国律师法》第三十一条规定了法律咨询及非诉讼法律服务。监察调查中的咨询、材料整理和救济准备，应与刑事诉讼中依法开展的会见、阅卷区分，不能承诺律师陪同监委讯问或立即会见留置人员。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[3][6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">咨询时可直接核对三件事：哪些线索支持提出合法性异议；现有材料还缺什么；下一步向哪个机关提交什么请求，以及怎样保留回执和跟进答复。律师工作范围与反馈安排应在委托中说清。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要避免的具体行为包括：编造施压经历，删改聊天或流水，与涉案人员对口径，替家属补造交易，或者向所谓“关系人”付费换放人承诺。依法提出事实异议、咨询律师和提交真实材料，是可以正常开展的事情。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>附：与本问题相关的服务积累与专业支撑\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：成安律师团队在卓安长期开展职务犯罪辩护与刑事风控服务。Z某案体现了调查早期法律帮助与后续辩护的衔接；团队的证据审查机制，将合法性、真实性和关联性分别核对，有助于避免只讨论“认不认”而遗漏具体材料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，设有公职人员风控部、专项风控部等业务部门。针对本文场景，可围绕争议事实梳理、施压线索核查、家属材料准备及依法救济开展评估，具体工作以程序条件、事实材料和委托约定为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">相关研究：成安律师著有《公职人员刑事法律风险防范实用手册》。研究与团队协作为判断履职风险、核对程序边界提供支持，不代表能够决定办案机关的处理结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>法律与公开资料索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》，2024年12月25日修正，相关修改自2025年6月1日起施行。本文涉及第二十四条、第三十六条、第四十三条、第四十四条、第六十九条。公开全文：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>原文链接：国家市场监督管理总局公开文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》，2025年修订，2025年6月1日起施行。本文涉及第六十条、第六十七条、第七十一条至第七十三条、第八十四条至第八十七条、第九十条、第九十一条。公开全文：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>原文链接：国家市场监督管理总局转载文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Csup>[3]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》，2018年修正现行文本，第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条、第五十五条至第六十条。本文未将修正草案内容作为现行权利。公开全文：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>原文链接：国家市场监督管理总局公开文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Csup>[4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">最高人民法院《关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》，法释〔2021〕1号，2021年3月1日起施行，第一百二十三条、第一百二十四条、第一百二十七条至第一百三十七条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>原文链接：最高人民法院正式文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Csup>[5]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》，2019年修订，第七十四条、第二百六十三条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>原文链接：最高人民检察院正式文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国律师法》，2026年8月28日修正，第三十一条、第四十一条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>原文链接：北京市司法局现行文本\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Csup>[7]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《广州中院深入开展“三项规程”改革试点工作》，人民法院报，2017年8月10日，最高人民法院网站刊载。用于核对郑某文案相关供述被排除的事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>原文链接：最高人民法院刊载报道\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Csup>[8]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《观点采撷：职务犯罪案件非法证据的审查与排除（下）》，山东法院网刊载。用于核对郑祖文案家属被威胁及后续供述审查的相关事实，不以文章中的旧条号替代现行规范。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>原文链接：山东法院网刊载文章\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Csup>[9]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队Z某挪用公款案，经授权使用的脱敏办案资料，案号未公开。本文引用范围为早期法律帮助、相关事实与最终刑罚，不涉及非法证据排除的业绩主张。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">以上法律及公开来源核对日期为2026年11月10日。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中团队案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。是否存在非法取证、是否排除具体证据及如何处理案件，均须依事实、证据和适用程序依法判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-10 22:17:21",{"id":420,"createdAt":426,"updatedAt":426,"deleted":34,"code":427,"name":428,"icon":35,"sort":182,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":430,"description":431,"keywords":35,"canonical":432,"image":422,"jsonLd":433},"公职人员被告知认了就能回家， 没收钱该怎么办？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】 接受监委谈话时，如果被告知“认了就能回家，不认连家属一起查”，对不属实的收钱事实，仍应如实说明。能否离场、是否留置、家属是否涉案，各有事实和程序条件，口头许诺不能替代依法决定。 现行监察规范明确禁止非法取证；法院公开案例也表明，严重威胁取得的供述存在依法排除的空间，但必须核查具体过程。 一句“要","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1455",[434],{"@context":374,"@graph":435},[436,443],{"@type":437,"@id":432,"url":432,"headline":421,"description":431,"datePublished":438,"dateModified":439,"author":440,"publisher":441,"articleSection":428,"inLanguage":379,"image":442},"Article","2026-11-10T22:17:21+08:00","2026-11-10T22:17:43+08:00",{"@id":381},{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff58238b4-6e5e-48b1-9421-b2f743e9fffa.jpg",{"@type":444,"itemListElement":445},"BreadcrumbList",[446,449,451],{"@type":447,"position":6,"name":448,"item":371},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":447,"position":41,"name":428,"item":450},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":447,"position":38,"name":421,"item":432}]