[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1420":416},{"entity":4,"seo":368},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":31,"branches":51,"honors":84,"cases":116,"caseTypes":199,"caseIntro":228,"latestLawyerNews":229,"lawyerNews":244,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":311,"serviceTags":312,"serviceCategories":313,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":344,"homeStats":345,"serviceProducts":358},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"complaintHotline":17,"recruitHotline":18,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":19,"headquartersLng":20,"headquartersLat":21,"foundingYear":22,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":23,"videoQrcode":24,"douyinQrcode":25,"xiaohongshuQrcode":26,"icpNumber":27,"psbNumber":28,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":30},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","19082470708","17879552328","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32","2026-11-09 10:24:43",[32,37,42,45,48],{"id":6,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":36,"linkUrl":35,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":39,"updatedAt":39,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":40,"linkUrl":35,"sort":41,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":43,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":35,"sort":38,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":46,"createdAt":33,"updatedAt":33,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":35,"sort":46,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":41,"createdAt":49,"updatedAt":49,"deleted":34,"title":35,"subtitle":35,"imageUrl":50,"linkUrl":35,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[52,58,63,68,73,78],{"id":38,"createdAt":53,"updatedAt":54,"deleted":34,"code":55,"name":56,"address":19,"phone":16,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":57,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":59,"updatedAt":59,"deleted":34,"code":60,"name":61,"address":62,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":41,"createdAt":64,"updatedAt":64,"deleted":34,"code":65,"name":66,"address":67,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":46,"createdAt":69,"updatedAt":69,"deleted":34,"code":70,"name":71,"address":72,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":43,"createdAt":74,"updatedAt":74,"deleted":34,"code":75,"name":76,"address":77,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":79,"createdAt":80,"updatedAt":80,"deleted":34,"code":81,"name":82,"address":83,"phone":35,"thumbnail":35,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":34,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[85,91,97,103,108,112],{"id":6,"createdAt":86,"updatedAt":86,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":87,"thumbnail":88,"content":10,"publishTime":89,"sort":90,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":41,"createdAt":92,"updatedAt":92,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":93,"thumbnail":94,"content":10,"publishTime":95,"sort":96,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":98,"createdAt":99,"updatedAt":99,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":100,"thumbnail":101,"content":10,"publishTime":102,"sort":57,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":38,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":105,"thumbnail":106,"content":10,"publishTime":107,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":46,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":109,"thumbnail":110,"content":10,"publishTime":111,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":104,"updatedAt":104,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":113,"thumbnail":114,"content":10,"publishTime":115,"sort":34,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[117,125,132,138,142,147,152,156,161,167,172,177,185,189,195],{"id":118,"title":119,"thumbnail":120,"summary":121,"caseTypeId":122,"caseTypeName":123,"caseTypeCode":124},883,"陈某敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师为其辩护，数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fc5d22dff-0601-424e-9410-d6556844ab31.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：敲诈勒索罪、强制猥亵罪 结果：数罪并罚有期徒刑六个月，罚金五千元，量刑显著减轻 亮点： 成功争取自首、未遂、初犯等从轻情节认定 精准区分犯罪情节轻微性，避免加重处罚 全面论证适用 缓刑 必要性（法院未",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":10,"summary":128,"caseTypeId":129,"caseTypeName":130,"caseTypeCode":131},882,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪案,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，检察院做不起诉决定。","案情简介 H公司为被告人Z某的丈夫G某创办，主营服务器出租服务和服务器重启、服务器重装、处理服务器操作系统层面问题等服务。 2021年4月至2022年底，H公司为“天天中彩（手机购彩）”赌博网站提供部分服务器并使用Z某及其母亲Y某的银行卡收",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},881,"Z某涉嫌串通投标罪,四川卓安律师事务所石大海律师经过不懈努力，成功取保候审","【案情简述】 2018年前后，Z某作为某建筑工程有限公司的员工，在涉案业务中负责协助完成招投标中标书的制作、联系其他投标公司等具体工作，通过“打招呼”等方式串通投标。对接业务过程中，在收取业主方费用后再支付给投标公司，赚取两项费用的差价。 ","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":139,"title":140,"thumbnail":10,"summary":141,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},880,"P某涉嫌销售伪劣产品案，石大海律师为其成功辩护，减少刑期18个月","一、案情简介 2021年3月至2022年6月期间，P某以鸭肉干冒充牛肉干通过淘宝店铺对外销售。P某负责淘宝店铺的仓库租赁、原料采购、经营推广、盈利管理，另请他人帮忙打包发货、负责客服。 2022年7月，公安机关现场查获P某打包假冒牛肉干的窝",{"id":143,"title":144,"thumbnail":145,"summary":146,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},879,"W某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，卓安律师事务所石大海、陈庆山律师为其辩护，由一年实刑变更为不起诉","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F9710800f-13b3-433c-96d6-26340bdc3451.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果：不起诉 亮点： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪； 犯罪未遂 与犯罪预备；事实不清；检察院采纳律师意见 封面语： W某进入跑分团伙为上游 电信诈骗 集团进行银行取现，涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":150,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},878,"Ｍ某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案","\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\徐艳\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml10556\\wps497.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ：掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：检察院采纳辩护人意见，给出适用缓刑的量刑建议，当事人在被逮捕9７天后顺利取保候审。 亮点 ：从犯认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点： 被告人是否为组织者；犯",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},877,"Z某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师竭尽全力，成功为当事人争取从轻处罚","【案件详情】 2024年1月，被告人Z偶然结识了C和大Z，三人通过“飞机”软件和微信“成都卡牌对接群”与昵称为“桃子”“木森Mr”“财源滚滚”“U商”等人取得联系，在“桃子”联系好提供银行账户的卡农人员后，C带人在现场对接卡农取现，并由C检",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},876,"赵某某涉嫌掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获得从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fb5cfbaef-5cf4-43b5-b315-f431a4326635.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名 ： 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪 结果 ：法院采纳部分辩护意见，对被告人从宽处罚，比第一被告人量刑更轻。 亮点 ： 从犯 认定争议；犯罪金额核减；争取赔偿取得谅解 焦点 ：被告人是否为组织者；犯罪既遂金额认定",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},875,"Y某某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师经过不懈努力，不予逮捕（取保候审）","一、案情简介 Y 某某因涉嫌寻衅滋事而被依法拘留，彼时公安已将案件报捕，局势紧迫，当务之急乃是全力以赴争取检察院不予批准逮捕，为 Y 某某争取更为有利的法律处境。 二、办案过程 在 2024 年 9 月 18 日，秦敏律师用专业精神与高度责","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","gang_crime",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":170,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},874,"L某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，获不予批准逮捕的良好结果。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F4be4d806-fab9-42da-bf7f-b0cfda868642.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名： 违法发放贷款罪 结果： 不批准逮捕 亮点： 银行事业部副总经理L某的行为不构成本罪；检察院采纳律师不予批准逮捕的法律意见。 焦点： 投资业务与贷款业务区分；是否符合违法发放贷款罪的构成要件。 封面语",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":175,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},873,"L某涉嫌合同诈骗罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获得不起诉结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fe92011b9-64b7-47dd-9efa-0b058d66cb28.png","案例罪名： 合同诈骗罪 案情简介： 2024年，L某因涉嫌合同诈骗罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，L某作为A有限公司法定代表人，在参与XX平台营销服务活动期间，指使公司员工通过控制多个账号进行虚假交易（刷单），骗取平台优惠补贴共计120余万元。",{"id":178,"title":179,"thumbnail":180,"summary":181,"caseTypeId":182,"caseTypeName":183,"caseTypeCode":184},872,"H某涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所秦敏律师为其辩护，取得公安机关对H某终止侦查，解除取保候审的良好结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F26392a98-fd04-419e-bb1e-846648713b0f.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：故意伤害罪 结果：终止侦查、解除取保候审 亮点：伤情成因鉴定、检察院立案监督 焦点：故意伤害致人轻伤、补充鉴定 封面语：H某因故意伤害致Z某轻伤被某区公安分局立案侦查，并采取取保候审的强制措施。四川卓",9,"人身权利犯罪优秀案例","criminal_complaint",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":10,"summary":188,"caseTypeId":46,"caseTypeName":136,"caseTypeCode":137},871,"陈某某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所 秦敏律师为其辩护，获不起诉结果。","案例罪名： 串通投标罪 案情简介： 2024年，陈某某因涉嫌串通投标罪被立案侦查。侦查机关指控，陈某某作为w公司法定代表人，在参与“J省某系统”项目期间，存在安排其他公司陪标、事先与招标单位沟通技术参数等行为。陈某某于2024年4月4日被监",{"id":190,"title":191,"thumbnail":10,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":79,"caseTypeName":193,"caseTypeCode":194},870,"F某涉嫌盗窃罪，四川卓安律师事务所母华强律师为其辩护，最终争取到缓刑","案情简介 2024年6月4日，F某与通过聊天软件认识的W某开房约会。次日早上，F某将W某放在宾馆电视柜上的黄金手镯拿走，并发送W某的照片进行威胁。6月5日，F某某被刑事拘留。6月16日， 卓安律师 事务所接受F某亲属委托，母华强律师前往看守","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":196,"title":197,"thumbnail":10,"summary":198,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":165,"caseTypeCode":166},869,"Z某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪案,吕灵兮律师经过不懈努力，减少指控事实。","案情简介 公诉 机关指控Z某： 参加黑社会性质组织罪： 2005年至2011年期间，Z某、T某等人进入Z某1控制下的H建设，部分组织成员为组织利益实施多起违法犯罪。 寻衅滋事罪：2011年12月1日20时许，被告人Z某2得知W某在H建设承建",[200,205,208,211,216,219,222,225],{"id":41,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":38,"code":166,"name":165,"summary":206,"keywords":207},"覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":46,"code":137,"name":136,"summary":209,"keywords":210},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":43,"code":212,"name":213,"summary":214,"keywords":215},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":79,"code":194,"name":193,"summary":217,"keywords":218},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":129,"code":131,"name":130,"summary":220,"keywords":221},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":122,"code":124,"name":123,"summary":223,"keywords":224},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":182,"code":184,"name":183,"summary":226,"keywords":227},"覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":230,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":239,"lawyer":243},899,"2026-11-10 13:43:02",49,"西藏昌都市贡觉县看守所","受贿罪","2026年11月10日 汪余财 受贿罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F03291226-9a52-4a48-b515-6a9ceb84cb90.png","2026-11-10 13:42:18","汪余财",[240],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F232b7ca1-0927-4ac5-a7ab-ccd2e0e63b92.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[245,248,267,280,293],{"id":230,"createdAt":231,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":246},[247],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":249,"createdAt":237,"updatedAt":237,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":250,"city":251,"caseType":252,"title":253,"thumbnail":254,"content":10,"publishTime":255,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":256,"lawyers":257},898,45,"甘孜州巴塘县人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年11月9日 秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财 开设赌场罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fd869aa87-b128-475a-8d42-f14e1e3a4993.png","2026-11-09 13:41:21","秦敏、吕灵兮、汪余财",[258,261,266],{"id":250,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":259,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":260,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"秦敏","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F9e874f4b-493f-4aaf-a0db-dff3a4a3e015.jpg",{"id":262,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":263,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},46,"吕灵兮","卓安（昆明）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F38ead6ca-386e-432e-a56c-02a6428dc69c.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":268,"createdAt":269,"updatedAt":269,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":270,"city":271,"caseType":272,"title":273,"thumbnail":274,"content":10,"publishTime":275,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":276,"lawyers":277},888,"2026-11-10 11:24:23",88,"中山市人民检察院","盗窃罪","2026年11月9日 郭伶玲 盗窃罪——卓安（深圳）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Ff52778cf-f583-4246-b1a1-1a71153c6f00.png","2026-11-09 11:23:38","郭伶玲",[278],{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":276,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":279,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":281,"createdAt":282,"updatedAt":282,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":283,"city":284,"caseType":285,"title":286,"thumbnail":287,"content":10,"publishTime":288,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":289,"lawyers":290},887,"2026-11-10 11:23:37",59,"成都市青白江区守所","抢劫罪","2026年11月9日 徐新明 抢劫罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002F2240884b-5354-4651-a08f-b611d92fbbe5.png","2026-11-09 11:22:32","徐新明",[291],{"id":283,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":292,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3015cf56-f273-4447-b96d-bca7d1c0859b.jpg",{"id":294,"createdAt":295,"updatedAt":295,"deleted":34,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":296,"city":297,"caseType":298,"title":299,"thumbnail":300,"content":10,"publishTime":301,"sort":34,"status":6,"lawyerNames":302,"lawyers":303},886,"2026-11-10 11:22:30",41,"成都市温江区人民检察院","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年11月9日 陈慧昌、丁平 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F10\u002Fbdfa960b-5039-4fff-8b26-277f721304a6.png","2026-11-09 11:21:38","陈慧昌、丁平",[304,307],{"id":296,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":305,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"陈慧昌","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F43c0bc0f-d402-4915-9506-0d14a43dcb19.jpg",{"id":308,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":309,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},50,"丁平","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",30,[],[314,319,324,329,334,339],{"id":43,"createdAt":315,"updatedAt":316,"deleted":34,"code":317,"name":318,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":34,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":34,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":323,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":41,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":325,"deleted":34,"code":326,"name":327,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":328,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":41,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":29,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":34,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":333,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":129,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":34,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":46,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":122,"createdAt":340,"updatedAt":341,"deleted":34,"code":342,"name":343,"summary":35,"displayTags":10,"icon":35,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[346,349,352,355],{"value":347,"label":348},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":350,"label":351},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":353,"label":354},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":356,"label":357},"6","全国分所",[359,362,365],{"title":360,"desc":361},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":363,"desc":364},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":366,"desc":367},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":369,"description":13,"keywords":370,"canonical":371,"image":10,"jsonLd":372},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[373],{"@context":374,"@graph":375},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[376,382],{"@type":377,"@id":378,"url":371,"name":7,"inLanguage":379,"publisher":380},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":383,"@id":381,"name":7,"url":371,"logo":384,"image":384,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":22,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":379,"address":385,"geo":388,"department":390},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19,"addressCountry":387},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":389,"latitude":21,"longitude":20},"GeoCoordinates",[391,396,400,404,408,412],{"@type":392,"@id":393,"name":56,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":394,"parentOrganization":395},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":19},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":397,"name":61,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":398,"parentOrganization":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":62},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":401,"name":66,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":402,"parentOrganization":403},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":67},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":405,"name":71,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":406,"parentOrganization":407},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":72},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":409,"name":76,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":410,"parentOrganization":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":77},{"@id":381},{"@type":392,"@id":413,"name":82,"image":10,"telephone":35,"address":414,"parentOrganization":415},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":386,"streetAddress":83},{"@id":381},{"entity":417,"seo":429},{"id":418,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":419,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":420,"title":421,"thumbnail":422,"content":423,"publishTime":424,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":425},1420,"2026-11-09 17:19:45",11,"退休干部被问十年前项目， 记不清该怎么说？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F09\u002Fa896182a-b501-417f-80a7-6336092e34a6.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">退休后被监委问到十年前的项目，确实记不清日期、金额或在场人员，应如实说明已经记得的部分、不能确认的内容以及可供核实的线索。不能为了显得配合，把估计填成确定事实；也不能把“不记得”用作回避已知问题的统一回答。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">现行监察规则、公开报道的岳某受贿案，以及成安律师团队办理的国企改制F某案，都提示应把个人陈述与客观材料逐项核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要分清：项目款、经手款和本人收款，是不是同一笔钱？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要核实：日期、人员和行为，是亲历记忆，还是从材料中得知？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">需要检查：笔录有没有保留“暂不能确认”等真实限定？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">眼前可以做的是整理一页旧项目时间线，把材料来源与记忆缺口标出来，再根据真实程序安排补充说明和法律咨询。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、怕说不清，最容易把猜测说成事实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如实回答，包括准确说明自己知道多少。某个细节想不起来，不能直接推出存在犯罪，也不能据此判断调查风险已经消失。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">你可能记得当年负责过一个项目，也记得与某家企业有往来，却分不清签合同、付款和交接发生在哪一年。接到通知后，真正困扰你的往往是：说记不清，会不会被认为不配合；先估一个数，以后发现错了又怎么办？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">应把问题拆开处理。记得收过钱而不记得数额，与连是否发生过收款都不能确认，表达的是不同事实。已经看过一张流水，也不代表你因此想起了十年前交款现场的全部经过。说明时应保持这些区别。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>记忆状态与下一步核对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">信息状态\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"219\">需要说明的内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"249\">可以核对的线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">亲历且记得\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"219\">自己做过什么、知道什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"249\">当时记录及相应业务材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">只记得大致范围\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"219\">能确认的范围及不确定部分\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"249\">任期、项目节点、付款日期\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">看材料后才知道\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"219\">材料写了什么、何时看到\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"249\">材料来源、完整上下文\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"120\">确实不能确认\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"219\">不能确认哪一项及真实原因\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"249\">保管单位、经办环节等线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、规则与公开案例，都要求把事情查实\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">调查需要核对有利、不利证据。记忆不完整时，客观材料可以帮助还原事实；没有完整记忆，也不妨碍办案机关依法调查认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）如实说明与核对笔录有明确依据\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十三条要求调查收集被调查人有无违法犯罪及情节轻重的证据。由此看，能反映本人未参与、未收款或记载有误的真实材料，同样有核查价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第八十五条规定谈话笔录交本人核对，遗漏、差错应补充、更正；第九十一条将有关要求适用于讯问。第九十条还要求对被讯问人的辩解如实记录、认真查核。这些规则支持准确表达，并未要求当事人为记不清的部分编出确定答案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">到了刑事审判，判断有罪还须符合《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第五十五条的证据要求。本人没有完整陈述，不能替代对全案证据的审查；本人作了陈述，也仍需检验证据是否可靠、充分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[3]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）岳某案中，具体过程靠材料继续核实\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">最高人民检察院网站2020年5月19日报道的岳某受贿案中，岳某承认收过一笔10.2万元，但称具体过程记不清。办案人员循银行凭证找到柜员，并核对银行卡实际使用人、款项性质等，查清了资金流转。报道载明岳某最终被判有期徒刑三年、缓刑五年，并处罚金20万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[5]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这是公开办案报道，不是指导性案例。它说明可以沿客观线索查清模糊的经过，不能据此判断岳某的记忆状态，更不能把其刑罚与“记不清”的表述建立因果关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">天津市纪委监委网站刊载的《认定案件事实应注意的三个关键》也提出，涉及记忆模糊的收款地点，可与出差、住宿等记录核对。这是取证方法参考，不是“有一处记错就全案不能认定”的规则。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[6]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、二十年前的国企改制，团队怎样审查旧材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">旧项目的争议，需要落实到权属、程序、金额和参与行为。案情年代久远，仍要逐项审查，不能只比较谁把往事讲得更完整。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的国企改制F某案，涉及二十年前的一次国企破产改制。检察机关指控F某利用职务便利，伙同他人将宿舍、食堂等价值1581万余元的资产转入新设公司，涉嫌贪污。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队围绕两类问题提出意见：一类是资产转移的性质，主张不构成贪污，另提出私分国有资产及追诉时效方面的意见；另一类是金额依据，审查评估报告等材料中的矛盾与不明确之处。同时，团队提出自首等从宽意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">结果须分别说明。法院仍认定F某犯贪污罪，最终判处有期徒刑三年、缓刑四年。案例介绍记载的从宽情节包括从犯、坦白、积极退赃；律师主张自首，法院认定的是坦白。罪名并未按律师提出的另一罪名处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[7]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这起案件与退休干部赴谈的具体事实不同，可借鉴的是核对旧项目材料的方法。其结果不能用于预测另一个案件，更不能据此承诺整理时间线就能避免留置、起诉或实刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、日期、金额和经手人，分别怎样核对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">一段往来中，时间、资金和知情范围可能各有不同的确定程度。应逐项核实，避免用一个模糊印象包办整件事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）时间记不准，先找真实的事件节点\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可以先核对任职、项目立项、合同签订、验收、付款、离任交接等节点。自己只记得事情发生在某个阶段，就说明这个阶段及判断依据；确实没有印象的，不应为了填满时间线硬选日期。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">任职材料能帮助判断当时职责，差旅记录能帮助核对是否到过某地，但单份材料通常不能证明全部行为。合同日期也可能早于实际付款。发现不一致，应保留两个记录并说明各自来源，不自行把其中一个改成另一个。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这类比对落实的是监察法第四十三条的查明事实要求。一个日期有误，是否影响责任判断，还要看它关系到职权、参与、收款还是其他实质事项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）金额记不准，把不同用途的钱分开\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">项目总价、单位付款、个人经手款与本人实际收到的财物，需要分别核对。对方提到一个总数时，先听清它指的是什么，再说明自己实际知道的部分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核对流水应连同付款人、收款人、日期和用途材料一起看。取现记录只能直接说明取现，不能单独证明现金交给了谁；转账备注也需要结合实际往来判断。岳某案中的资金核查，正涉及账户使用、转款方式和款项性质等多个环节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[5]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">记得有一笔往来但数额不准，应说明确实记得的事实及数额的核实线索。既不能把所有转账一概承认为个人收款，也不能为了降低金额随意报一个数。这是根据证据要求提出的核对方法，不是对任何款项性质的预先判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）谁在场、自己知道什么，要分开说\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在同一部门工作、通常参加某类会议，不能直接证明某一次就在场。可以核对会议签到、出差安排、经办签字及其他合法取得的记录，说明本人是参与、听说，还是后来查材料才知道。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">签过一份文件，也要继续核实签字环节、材料内容、当时职责和实际知情范围。不能仅凭岗位名称作结论；也不能把所有责任都推给他人。应将自己具体做过的事说明白，对不能确认的他人行为保留边界。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">调查机关可以继续核查其他证据。本人可以提供核实线索，但不应联系其他涉案人员共同编排经过，或让家属传递谁说了什么。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1][2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）笔录核对，要看事实与限定是否完整\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">重点核对主语、日期、金额、次数、行为顺序和信息来源。自己说的是依据材料得知，笔录不宜写成亲眼见到；自己暂不能确认某个数额，也不宜被写成已经确认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">发现遗漏或差错，应具体指出哪一处需要补充、更正，并按程序确认。已经签字后才发现实质错误，应及时通过合法渠道补充说明原记载、准确情况、发现原因和核实依据，保留合法提交记录。补充说明仍须核查，不会自动使原笔录失效。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如涉及讯问，现行条例要求全程同步录音录像；普通谈话是否必须全程录制，应依措施性质及重要程度判断。可以针对具体争议提出核查原始记录的请求，不能把申请核查写成当然能够取得录像副本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[2]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、从接到通知起，现在可以做什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先确认真实程序，再整理事实和材料。律师可以依法提供咨询与材料评估，监察调查中的服务范围须与移送后的刑事辩护分别说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">赴谈前，核实通知机关、时间、地点、要求携带的材料，以及能够确认的身份和程序信息。电话里都称“谈话”，不代表实际措施、对象身份相同；不清楚的，可向通知人员询问。不要仅凭电话用词判断是否已经立案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">用一页纸列出旧项目节点，每项注明信息来源、确定程度及缺少的材料。它是帮助核实事实的工作底稿，不能冒充当年形成的原始记录。单位档案不在手中，可以先列保管部门、文件名称和相关期间，由有权主体依程序核查，不擅自取走、复制涉密资料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">接受谈话或讯问时，听清具体事项，按照真实记忆和依法出示的材料回答。材料引起新的回忆时，说明是哪份材料帮助想起哪部分；只是看到材料记载的，不将其说成恢复了亲历记忆。有真实听力、阅读或健康困难，及时反映具体需要。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可以整理合法持有的通知、相关资金记录，以及确与理解、记忆有关的诊疗材料；不要替本人补出未亲历的经过。涉及保密要求，先核清可以提供的范围，不向多人群聊、公开平台传播案情和内部文件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">确实记不清，不是监察法第二十四条单列的留置事由。是否留置，须综合涉嫌问题、已掌握证据、仍需调查事项、法定情形及审批判断；不能承诺如实说明便一定不留置。伪造、隐匿、毁灭证据等行为，还可能另受处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[1]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在成都寻求此类法律服务，可以围绕三个具体问题咨询：目前哪些事实可以确认，哪些材料能够合法补充，是否需要提交有依据的补充说明。监察调查阶段可依法开展法律咨询、事实梳理和家属事项支持，不能直接承诺陪同讯问、会见留置人员或查阅案卷。移送审查起诉后，依法衔接会见、阅卷及相关辩护工作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Csup>[3][4]\u003C\u002Fsup>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">接到通知后，先把已经能确认的旧项目节点写下来。对记忆空白保留真实说明，对事实差错及时核实、更正，让每个确定答案都有实际依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>条文与案例来源\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[1]《中华人民共和国监察法》，2024年修正、2025年6月1日起施行，重点参见第二十四条、第四十三条、第四十四条、第七十二条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>国家监察委员会举报网站公开全文\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[2]《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》，2025年修订，重点参见第六十条、第八十五至八十七条、第九十条、第九十一条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>国家市场监督管理总局转载正式全文\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[3]《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》，2018年修正，参见第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条、第五十五条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>国家市场监督管理总局公开全文\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[4]《中华人民共和国律师法》，2026年修正，参见第三十一条、第四十一条。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>北京市司法局公开全文\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[5]《检察官提前介入锁定关键证据 河南息县一卫生院原院长受贿被判刑》，2020年5月19日，检察日报报道。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>最高人民检察院网站\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[6]曾威斌《认定案件事实应注意的三个关键》，2022年9月16日。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cu>天津市纪委监委网站转载中国纪检监察报文章\u003C\u002Fu>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">[7]成安律师团队国企改制F某案。依据授权案例介绍作脱敏转述，未公开案号；本文仅引用该案载明的争点、辩护意见及处理结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">规则核对截至2026年11月9日；历史案例与现行规则分别理解。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>附：与本问题相关的专业积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>服务积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安团队累计办理职务犯罪案件600余件，具有围绕历史项目定性、金额证据及从宽情节分别审查的经验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安刑事风控委员会\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会由成安律师发起、领衔，设公职人员风控、专项风控等部门，可依法评估旧项目履职风险、梳理时间线和材料缺口。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>本题咨询准备\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">咨询前准备通知信息、本人职责与合法材料目录；敏感材料先说明来源。具体工作、提交安排和反馈范围，在核实程序后约定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-11-09 17:19:26",{"id":420,"createdAt":426,"updatedAt":426,"deleted":34,"code":427,"name":428,"icon":35,"sort":182,"status":6,"seoTitle":35,"seoDescription":35,"seoKeywords":35},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":430,"description":431,"keywords":35,"canonical":432,"image":422,"jsonLd":433},"退休干部被问十年前项目， 记不清该怎么说？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】 退休后被监委问到十年前的项目，确实记不清日期、金额或在场人员，应如实说明已经记得的部分、不能确认的内容以及可供核实的线索。不能为了显得配合，把估计填成确定事实；也不能把“不记得”用作回避已知问题的统一回答。 现行监察规则、公开报道的岳某受贿案，以及成安律师团队办理的国企改制F某案，都提示应把个人","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1420",[434],{"@context":374,"@graph":435},[436,443],{"@type":437,"@id":432,"url":432,"headline":421,"description":431,"datePublished":438,"dateModified":439,"author":440,"publisher":441,"articleSection":428,"inLanguage":379,"image":442},"Article","2026-11-09T17:19:26+08:00","2026-11-09T17:19:45+08:00",{"@id":381},{"@id":381},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F11\u002F09\u002Fa896182a-b501-417f-80a7-6336092e34a6.jpg",{"@type":444,"itemListElement":445},"BreadcrumbList",[446,449,451],{"@type":447,"position":6,"name":448,"item":371},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":447,"position":41,"name":428,"item":450},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":447,"position":38,"name":421,"item":432}]