[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1231":406},{"entity":4,"seo":358},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":201,"caseIntro":233,"latestLawyerNews":234,"lawyerNews":249,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":301,"serviceTags":302,"serviceCategories":303,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":334,"homeStats":335,"serviceProducts":348},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,128,133,141,148,153,158,163,168,173,178,183,188,196],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},793,"Z某被控犯销售伪劣产品罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑并当庭释放","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F46275dd7-888f-477b-a649-7da7e054aaee.png","一、案情简介 被告人Z某等人违反国家烟草专卖规定，生产、销售伪劣雪茄烟，Z某被指控销售金额80余万元，获利10余万元，其行为构成销售伪劣产品罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师一直坚持罪名变更为 非法经营 以及犯罪金额证据不足，否则按照销售伪劣产品","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":126,"caseTypeCode":127},792,"J某涉嫌受贿罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其积极辩护，从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F2509a569-50cd-4b01-9a35-19c389e40dd7.png","一、案情简介 J某利用职务便利收受他人财物50余万元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":131,"summary":132,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},791,"Y某涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6848d7d9-51e4-41a2-a21f-b54242fcf9d4.png","一、案情简介 Y某因涉嫌生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪被指定居所监视居住。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见维权工作，同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案",{"id":134,"title":135,"thumbnail":136,"summary":137,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},790,"Z某涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获拘留30天内变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F91b12c44-1a46-4763-8d84-764e429c7273.png","一、案情简介 Z某因购买新注册的企业及法人信息而涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师在接受委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},789,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F0c1f1623-3457-4f21-a1b9-8d9db8ea8b5f.png","一、案情简介 G某涉嫌 敲诈勒索 ，此前在杨巽律师的辩护下争取到30天内 取保候审 ，在取保一年后成功解除强制措施。 二、办案过程 在取保候审期间，杨巽律师定期和案件承办人沟通了解侦查进展，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件的看法和观点，争取","财产犯罪优秀案例","property_crime",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":151,"summary":152,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},788,"G某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获公安机关变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F5d95a9bf-f0cd-4786-9c53-944ebd5e5bc6.png","一、案情简介 G某因涉嫌 敲诈勒索罪 被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":76,"caseTypeName":146,"caseTypeCode":147},787,"H某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F6205fc11-aded-4213-a806-a8ae5d7ca31f.png","一、案情简介 H某等人通过在百度搜索上购买点击率的方式开展物流运输的宣传，在接到被害人运输邀约后，与被害人谈好运输价格，将货物拉走后，再寻找有运输条件的公司承运。在此期间以控制货物为要挟，向被害人恶意加价运输费用，以被害人不付运费便不能拿货",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":161,"summary":162,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},786,"S某涉嫌破坏计算机信息系统罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获检察院阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd31daa6c-1432-41a6-b018-2b4f3b804521.png","一、案情简介 嫌疑人S某在互联网上查找“资金盘”平台漏洞后，编写软件盗取“资金盘”内用户的账号密码，通过卡商提供相应的银行卡进行提现。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了",{"id":164,"title":165,"thumbnail":166,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},785,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcf03627d-48a9-4e34-9f52-04003b7dca1f.png","一、案情简介 W某通过他人介绍注册“万合足球”APP，进而利用注册的APP进行足球赌博违法活动。期间，W某为营利，在明知“万合足球”APP为赌博网站的情况下，发展直系下线，除自己参与赌球以外，还同时享有其直系下线赌博收益的一部分作为佣金。 ",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":171,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},784,"T某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fd05d8a88-e0f6-432f-b99e-d33d5bb322a3.png","一、案情简介 T某在明知BKEX交易所是一家利用虚拟货币进行合约交易的非法平台的情况下，在“BKEX”平台任技术部软件开发程序员、市值组组长等职，负责合约交易做市程序的优化与维护，共计获利折合人民币91万余元。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":176,"summary":177,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},783,"Z某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F76708c65-d57a-4b47-884b-ce34ceadca3a.png","一、案情简介 Z某因涉嫌 开设赌场罪 罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己",{"id":179,"title":180,"thumbnail":181,"summary":182,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},782,"S某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护成功获不起诉决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F4d5c9a3b-e03d-477b-b12c-7627a9a7d0ee.png","一、案情简介 S某进入某公司兼职参与赌博群的管理，在明知公司开发的聊天结算平台主要服务对象为赌客的情况下，仍参与聊天结算平台的运营以及公司的日常事务。 二、办案过程 辩护人接受委托后，立刻前往看守所会见S某，之后与承办人积极沟通，向承办人提",{"id":184,"title":185,"thumbnail":186,"summary":187,"caseTypeId":138,"caseTypeName":139,"caseTypeCode":140},781,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院审查起诉阶段变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F78134179-fb68-4594-aa5f-b108499f461c.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌 开设赌场 罪被批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对",{"id":189,"title":190,"thumbnail":191,"summary":192,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},780,"Z某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，杨巽律师为其辩护获解除取保候审决定","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002Fcffd8721-7adc-4a2a-862d-a102bfc97fe4.png","一、案情简介 Z某因参与介绍未成年卖淫而涉嫌介绍卖淫罪。 二、办案过程 杨巽律师接受委托后，第一时间和办案单位沟通交流对案件的看法和观点，检察院采纳律师意见对Z某不予批准逮捕，Z某变更强制措施为。之后，杨巽律师继续跟进案件进展，在Z某取保候",8,"性犯罪优秀案例","corporate_compliance",{"id":197,"title":198,"thumbnail":199,"summary":200,"caseTypeId":193,"caseTypeName":194,"caseTypeCode":195},779,"W某涉嫌介绍卖淫罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所杨巽律师为其辩护，获检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F29\u002F074cf8a5-1ce9-48ba-b196-28c4b7516228.png","一、案情简介 W某因涉嫌介绍卖淫罪被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承办律师与承办人就案件存在的问题进行沟通，积极主动地向承办人提出自己对案件",[202,205,210,213,218,221,224,227],{"id":38,"code":127,"name":126,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":206,"name":207,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":211,"keywords":212},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":147,"name":146,"summary":219,"keywords":220},"覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":138,"code":140,"name":139,"summary":222,"keywords":223},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":193,"code":195,"name":194,"summary":225,"keywords":226},"覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":228,"code":229,"name":230,"summary":231,"keywords":232},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":235,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":244,"lawyer":248},831,"2026-10-27 10:29:19",82,"西昌市看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月20日 张津川 诈骗罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe894f1b9-c858-4fb5-a101-1ae3b44dc208.png","2026-10-20 11:27:15","张津川",[245],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[250,253,266,278,289],{"id":235,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":237,"city":238,"caseType":239,"title":240,"thumbnail":241,"content":10,"publishTime":242,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":243,"lawyers":251},[252],{"id":237,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":243,"position":246,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":247,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":254,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":255,"city":256,"caseType":257,"title":258,"thumbnail":259,"content":10,"publishTime":260,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":261,"lawyers":262},830,83,"绵阳市涪城区人民检察院","职务侵占罪","2026年10月20日 吴亮 职务侵占罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F4340bc0c-447e-4dae-a2e4-8e68069399e7.png","2026-10-20 11:26:17","吴亮",[263],{"id":255,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":261,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":265,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2a4e2cca-a0b3-4bbe-b5ed-dc0d91aec070.jpg",{"id":267,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":268,"city":269,"caseType":270,"title":271,"thumbnail":272,"content":10,"publishTime":273,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":274,"lawyers":275},829,78,"重庆市九龙坡区人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年10月20日 彭栖伟 开设赌场罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F8e9a02bf-330a-483f-875f-b9e94a610ec0.png","2026-10-20 11:25:36","彭栖伟",[276],{"id":268,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":274,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":277,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":279,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":280,"city":281,"caseType":239,"title":282,"thumbnail":283,"content":10,"publishTime":284,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":285,"lawyers":286},828,50,"成都市龙泉驿区看守所","2026年10月20日 丁平 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F34ad0be4-0cc2-4ce1-876c-1bb0b2837f62.png","2026-10-20 11:24:58","丁平",[287],{"id":280,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":288,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",{"id":290,"createdAt":236,"updatedAt":236,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":291,"city":292,"caseType":293,"title":294,"thumbnail":295,"content":10,"publishTime":296,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":297,"lawyers":298},827,44,"彭州市看守所","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年10月20日 宁得宇 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fbab16de0-23a5-4dbb-bd9a-e78176788977.png","2026-10-20 11:24:14","宁得宇",[299],{"id":291,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":297,"position":264,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":300,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F88cf054d-ca57-4c31-be35-19492c99381d.jpg",73,[],[304,309,314,319,324,329],{"id":40,"createdAt":305,"updatedAt":306,"deleted":31,"code":307,"name":308,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":310,"deleted":31,"code":311,"name":312,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":313,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":318,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":320,"deleted":31,"code":321,"name":322,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":323,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":138,"createdAt":325,"updatedAt":326,"deleted":31,"code":327,"name":328,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":193,"createdAt":330,"updatedAt":331,"deleted":31,"code":332,"name":333,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[336,339,342,345],{"value":337,"label":338},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":340,"label":341},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":343,"label":344},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":346,"label":347},"6","全国分所",[349,352,355],{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":356,"desc":357},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":359,"description":13,"keywords":360,"canonical":361,"image":10,"jsonLd":362},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[363],{"@context":364,"@graph":365},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[366,372],{"@type":367,"@id":368,"url":361,"name":7,"inLanguage":369,"publisher":370},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":371},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":373,"@id":371,"name":7,"url":361,"logo":374,"image":374,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":369,"address":375,"geo":378,"department":380},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":377},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":379,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[381,386,390,394,398,402],{"@type":382,"@id":383,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":384,"parentOrganization":385},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":387,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":388,"parentOrganization":389},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":391,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":392,"parentOrganization":393},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":395,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":396,"parentOrganization":397},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":399,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":400,"parentOrganization":401},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":371},{"@type":382,"@id":403,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":404,"parentOrganization":405},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":376,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":371},{"entity":407,"seo":419},{"id":408,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":409,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":410,"title":411,"thumbnail":412,"content":413,"publishTime":414,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":415},1231,"2026-10-31 16:46:44",11,"公职人员多年前的往来被查， 没有我承认也能定罪吗？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F31\u002F50914450-3a56-4767-b0af-d3c6526f1236.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【摘要】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】可以，但必须有达到法定标准的证据。公职人员多年前的收款、项目往来被重新核查，没有本人供述，仍可能被认定犯罪；有流水、有人指认，也不等于每笔钱都已被证明是赃款。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">刑事诉讼和监察调查规则都要求核实证据、综合判断。团队办理的历史国企改制案、资金往来案，也说明款项性质和本人责任需要分别审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文集中回答：旧流水到底证明了什么？相关人员的说法怎样核实？眼下会不会被留置、本人和家属能做什么？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先把每笔往来的时间、来源、用途与对应事项列清，真实说明记忆边界，保留合法取得的原始材料，再按程序阶段寻求专业评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">一、多年前的往来突然被问起，先判断哪里有风险\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】风险取决于具体行为和证据，不能靠“我没承认”判断安全，也不能看到旧流水就认定已经有罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">单位通知谈话，问起几年前某位老板的转账、某个项目的审批。你记得收过钱，却一时想不起完整经过；对方已经说是“感谢费”。这时最容易出现两种反应：觉得没有自己承认就办不成，或者担心解释越多越麻烦，索性把对方说的都认下来。两种做法都会妨碍准确说明事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如果存在利用职务便利收受财物、为他人谋利等事实，就需要评估受贿等刑事风险；如果主张是真实借款、报销或其他往来，就应当把依据找出来。一般违纪、职务违法和犯罪的条件不同，不能仅凭“不规范”三个字直接定性。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">眼前的情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">能说明什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">先核实什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">查到一笔转账\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">有资金往来，需要核查\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">谁付款、谁使用、真实用途\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">对方称为办事送钱\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">有不利陈述，需要查证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">具体请托、本人行为、其他印证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"158\">本人想不起细节\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"189\">记忆存在缺口\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"241\">哪些亲历、哪些待查、资料在哪里\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">事情久远，会影响查证方法，也可能涉及追诉时效等问题，但不能直接推出“不再追究”。先确认被问的是哪件事、哪个时段、本人当时负责什么，再作法律判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">二、没有供述能认定，但证据必须经得起核查\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】本人是否承认，与证据能否证明犯罪，是两个需要分别判断的问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）规则已经明确，不以取得供述为前提\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第五十五条规定，没有被告人供述，证据确实、充分的，可以定罪处罚；反过来，仅有供述、没有其他证据，也不能定罪处罚。重点是案件事实有证据支持，定案证据经过法定程序核实，综合判断已经排除合理怀疑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察阶段同样如此。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第六十七条允许在没有被调查人陈述、供述而证据符合法定标准时认定事实；第七十条要求职务犯罪案件调查终结达到相应证明标准，证据不足不得移送审查起诉。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）流水真实，还要查它与犯罪事实的联系\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">银行记录能够反映转账，但通常不能独自回答钱为什么给、由谁实际支配、与哪项职务行为有关。办案机关会把流水与账户控制、交往记录、项目文件和相关人员陈述结合起来核查。本人也应针对这些联系说明真实经过。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">“没有本人供述”不等于“没有直接证据”，亲历送钱的人的陈述可能直接涉及案件主要事实。如果确实没有直接证据，《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》第一百四十条还要求：间接证据经查证属实，彼此能够印证，形成完整证据链，排除合理怀疑、结论具有唯一性，推理符合逻辑和经验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">没有查获当年的现金，也不必然无法认定历史收款；提款、交付经过、资金使用及其他记录可能共同证明事实。相应地，一笔提款也不能自动证明现金交给了你。缺的是哪一段联系，要具体指出。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">三、历史旧账和转账争议，团队怎样核对\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】有用的工作，是找出证据实际证明到哪里，再分别评估性质、金额与本人责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）F某国企改制案，先审查旧资产转移的背景\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">成安律师团队办理的F某案，涉及较早时期的国企破产改制。公诉机关指控，其伙同他人将宿舍、食堂等价值1581万余元的国有资产转入新公司，涉嫌贪污。年代久远，改制背景、资产性质和评估依据都直接影响判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">团队提出不构成贪污、即使构成犯罪也应评价为私分国有资产并审查追诉时效等意见，同时指出评估报告等材料存在矛盾和不明确之处，并提出从犯、退赃等从宽意见。最终法院采纳部分意见，仍以贪污罪判处F某有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年；自首主张对应的最终认定为坦白。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">这个结果说明，历史事实要结合当时背景与具体证据审查。它并未证明“年代久远就无罪”，也不能被当作“没有供述而获缓刑”的案例。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）Y某资金往来案，转过钱还要审查给钱目的\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在另一件成安律师团队案例中，Y某涉嫌向合作公司部门负责人支付31万元，被指控对非国家工作人员行贿。转账记录存在，收款人也承认收款。团队审查全案证据，围绕主观意图和谋取不正当利益等要件提出意见，检察机关最终作出不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">该案涉及的主体、罪名与公职人员受贿不同，可借鉴的是把资金往来的目的和证据联系查清。公职人员的实际收款和履职行为，仍应按对应罪名逐项评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">四、手上只有旧流水和他人说法，重点核对四件事\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】把争议落实到每一笔钱、每一项行为、每一种信息来源，才能提出可以核实的说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）审查要点一 账户上的钱，是否由本人收取和支配\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">先核对户名、账户实际使用人、入账和后续去向。家属账户收款、多人共同使用账户、代收后转付，都需要结合真实记录解释。账户在谁名下与钱实际归谁，可能一致，也可能需要进一步查明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">可把同一款项的进出账、结算凭证和当时沟通记录对应起来。仅说“卡不是我在用”不足以排除联系；仅凭账户关系也不能省去对本人知情、参与行为的核实。审查依据是实施条例第六十八条关于关联程度和证据联系的综合判断要求。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）审查要点二 这笔钱与哪项职务行为有关\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将收款时间与任职、分工、请托、签批或协调事项放在同一时间线上。主张借款、报销的，核对当时形成的借款沟通、真实用途、原始票据及实际还款；不能凭一个转账备注下结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">如果对方称为办事送钱，要继续核实请托内容、本人是否知情、实际做过什么。也不能因事情最终没办成，就认定没有受贿风险。《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百八十五条要求结合职务便利、收受财物、谋利等具体行为评价，构成条件不能用资金名称替代。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）审查要点三 对方是亲历，还是听别人说\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">核对相关人员究竟亲自付款、在场见证，还是事后转述；能否说清时间、地点、金额和交付经过。多人说法一致，也应查明是否分别亲历，不能只数人数。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">将陈述与当时行程、项目进度、资金来源等比对。一般日期记忆偏差与交付方式、参与人员等关键矛盾，影响可能不同；不能把每处差异都当作推翻全案的依据。实施条例第六十七条、第六十八条要求证据查证属实并相互印证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）审查要点四 汇总金额是否混入不同性质的往来\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">多年流水容易同时出现借入、归还、代付、报销与内部划转。先列日期、金额、对象、用途、对应凭证，再识别同一笔钱是否在不同账户重复出现、不同往来是否被混算。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">逐笔核对并不意味着每项解释都会被采纳。本人主张扣除的款项也要有真实依据，不能为降低总额任意命名。证据是否充分，仍按实施条例第七十条和刑事诉讼法第五十五条判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">五、现在怎样应对，什么阶段可以找律师\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">【核心结论】现在可以咨询；先停止删改、串联等错误动作，把事实和材料整理清楚。是否留置另按法定条件判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（一）本人接受谈话前后，把记得和待核实的分开\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">只整理自己亲历的经过，标明确定的时间、尚不确定的细节和可核查的资料位置。记不清就据实说明，不猜补、不迎合；对确实发生的问题如实交代。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">谈话、讯问笔录应认真核对，尤其检查“听说”是否写成“明知”，“代付”是否写成“本人收取”。发现遗漏或差错，具体请求补充、更正；已签认后发现问题，及时说明错误位置、原因及核查线索。相关依据为实施条例第八十五条、第八十七条、第九十条、第九十一条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（二）家属保存原件，列出需要依法调取的线索\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可整理自己合法持有的完整流水、家庭往来凭证、原始聊天及设备，说明每份材料来自哪里、对应哪件事。单位档案等无法合法取得的，列明保管单位、文件名称和时间，请依法核查，不越权复制涉密材料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">家属可以依法咨询、向办案机关反映情况和提交真实材料。不要找相关人员统一说法，不倒签借条、不改账、不删记录，也不通过转移财物掩盖既有往来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（三）会不会留置，不能只看是否承认\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条要求：涉嫌严重职务违法或者职务犯罪，已掌握部分违法犯罪事实及证据，仍有重要问题需要调查，并具有案情重大复杂、可能逃跑自杀、可能串供毁证或其他妨碍调查等法定情形之一，还须依法审批。第四十七条另规定决定和报批程序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">因此，没有供述也可能依法留置；如实配合也不能保证不留置。留置条件与最终定罪标准不同，不能因尚未达到定罪证明标准就推定不会采取措施。应当遵守已告知的到案及措施义务，避免干扰调查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">（四）找律师时，先说清阶段与最担心的一笔钱\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">监察期间，可以就合法掌握的信息咨询风险、梳理历史往来、整理说明和调取线索；不能把这类服务说成当然可以到留置场所会见或调阅监察案卷。移送审查起诉后，依法办理辩护委托，再依刑事诉讼法第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条开展相应工作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">在成都咨询此类问题，可以向由成安律师领衔的卓安刑事风控委员会说明收到的通知、目前阶段及争议往来。先准备一张逐笔清单和对应原始凭证，核对当前风险、待补材料及下一步工作条件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">条文与案例索引\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》，第五十条、第五十一条、第五十五条；第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条。采用2018年第三次修正文本。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法》，第二十四条、第四十七条，留置条件与审批。2024年修正，2025年6月1日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》，第六十六条至第七十条、第八十五条、第八十七条、第九十条、第九十一条，证据标准、如实陈述与笔录核对。2025年修订。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》，法释〔2021〕1号，第一百四十条，间接证据定案条件；2021年3月1日起施行。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">《中华人民共和国刑法》，第三百八十五条，受贿罪的行为要件。 \u003C\u002Fspan>官方全文\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">案例：F某国企改制贪污案、Y某涉嫌对非国家工作人员行贿案，均为经授权脱敏的成安律师团队案例。个案结果不能代替对当前事实的具体评估。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">附 卓安在本类危机应对中的专业支持\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">服务积累：卓安长期开展职务犯罪案件办理与刑事风控服务。上述历史改制、资金往来案例，体现了核对旧账、区分款项性质和审查证明材料的工作积累。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，依托四川卓安律师事务所开展公职人员风控和专项危机应对。围绕本文问题，可评估历史往来风险、协助整理真实说明及材料线索，并按程序阶段衔接后续法律服务；具体范围以依法确认的委托为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">免责声明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 32pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-31 16:55:21",{"id":410,"createdAt":416,"updatedAt":416,"deleted":31,"code":417,"name":418,"icon":32,"sort":228,"status":6,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":420,"description":421,"keywords":32,"canonical":422,"image":412,"jsonLd":423},"公职人员多年前的往来被查， 没有我承认也能定罪吗？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】可以，但必须有达到法定标准的证据。公职人员多年前的收款、项目往来被重新核查，没有本人供述，仍可能被认定犯罪；有流水、有人指认，也不等于每笔钱都已被证明是赃款。 刑事诉讼和监察调查规则都要求核实证据、综合判断。团队办理的历史国企改制案、资金往来案，也说明款项性质和本人责任需要分别审查。 本文集中回答","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1231",[424],{"@context":364,"@graph":425},[426,433],{"@type":427,"@id":422,"url":422,"headline":411,"description":421,"datePublished":428,"dateModified":429,"author":430,"publisher":431,"articleSection":418,"inLanguage":369,"image":432},"Article","2026-10-31T16:55:21+08:00","2026-10-31T16:46:44+08:00",{"@id":371},{"@id":371},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F31\u002F50914450-3a56-4767-b0af-d3c6526f1236.jpg",{"@type":434,"itemListElement":435},"BreadcrumbList",[436,439,441],{"@type":437,"position":6,"name":438,"item":361},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":437,"position":38,"name":418,"item":440},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":437,"position":35,"name":411,"item":422}]