[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-CA-1103":403},{"entity":4,"seo":355},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":195,"caseIntro":230,"latestLawyerNews":231,"lawyerNews":246,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":298,"serviceTags":299,"serviceCategories":300,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":331,"homeStats":332,"serviceProducts":345},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所由执业近30年的成安博士于2013年发起设立，是全国最早一批专注刑事的刑事专业律师事务所之一。一心一意，只做刑事，不做综合所，不接非刑事业务。以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,121,126,131,136,141,146,153,158,165,173,177,181,185,190],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":117,"summary":118,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},709,"Z某涉嫌高利转贷等罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其无罪辩护，法院宣判无罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F0a7baa15-a6ee-41ca-ae2b-d86edffbb0a7.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人在明知出借人是从银行贷款出来的钱后，仍然介绍借款人给出借人，金额高达上百万，构成高利转贷罪。 二、办案过程与结果 接到家属委托后第一时间前往会见，梳理卷宗，最终通过开庭时的据理力争，成功打掉该罪名，法院宣判无","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":122,"title":123,"thumbnail":124,"summary":125,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},708,"Y某卖烟涉嫌非法经营罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fdd174c24-5332-4bf7-a617-b2cd89db9554.png","一、案例罪名： 非法经营罪 二、案情简介： 办案机关指控当事人无证卖烟，500多条烟全被没收，涉案价值十万元左右。 三、办案过程： 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时",{"id":127,"title":128,"thumbnail":129,"summary":130,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},707,"D某卖烟股东涉嫌非法经营罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，在逮捕后成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F7c1c2115-8db9-4ccf-a3c5-5b598e85e2ef.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人作为股东和实际经营者的身份，参与两个店铺私下售卖香烟的活动，经营数额达到近40万，并且在同案家中还搜出大量香烟存货。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续，客观公正地分",{"id":132,"title":133,"thumbnail":134,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},706,"Y某卖烟老板涉嫌非法经营罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fc4b12d35-80b7-4a81-8a80-c58a67c6a1c0.png","一、案情简介 当事人无烟草专卖零售许可证，找司机运输300多条烟想要拿来再卖时，运输途中被办案机关挡获，顺着司机笔录、派单信息、收货信息，侦查机关直接异地上门抓捕当事人。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":139,"summary":140,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},705,"W某卖电子烟涉嫌非法经营罪、销售伪劣产品罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fc1d3f8ce-0cc5-48f1-b5f4-32737ad4fcca.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人在2022年10月之后仍在售卖水果味电子烟，现场进行抓捕并查获店内库存，刚开始以立案，但后面由于律师提出当事人具备烟草专卖零售许可证，上面明确写明当事人有电子烟零售资格，故侦查机关改为以销售伪劣产品罪指控。 ",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":144,"summary":145,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":119,"caseTypeCode":120},704,"H某涉嫌房地产业诈骗罪，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，成功取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fd95de080-9070-48ad-b94c-ecc4de442609.png","一、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人作为房地产咨询公司的法人，明知并且帮助公司对客户进行诈骗，数额特别巨大，情节严重。 二、办案过程 承办律师在接受当事人家属委托之后，立即前往办案单位递交委托手续并开展会见工作，客观公正地分析了案件情况。同时承",{"id":147,"title":148,"thumbnail":149,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},703,"L某涉嫌贩卖毒品罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，检察院不予批准逮捕并变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F884d8a69-4b7d-46f6-afce-990c9062826b.png","一、案情简介 L某因出售大麻给好友，以涉嫌 贩卖毒品罪 被刑事拘留。 二、办案过程 接到家属委托后第一时间前往会见，当事人将如何到案以及每一次给好友大麻的详细过程讲述给律师，律师在其中找到相应辩点，并依据《全国法院毒品案件审判工作会议纪要》","毒品犯罪优秀案例","drug_crime",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":156,"summary":157,"caseTypeId":40,"caseTypeName":151,"caseTypeCode":152},702,"W某涉嫌贩卖毒品案，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其开庭辩护，争取到比量刑建议更低的刑期","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F3b51bd8d-cfad-4548-8234-80e435979513.png","一、案例罪名： 贩卖毒品罪 二、案情简介 办案机关指控当事人贩卖1克左右的冰毒。 三、开庭过程 签了认罪认罚后，庭上再出现新情节，检察院先不认可，提交了相应证据后虽然认可了，但坚持不愿意再下调量刑建议。 家属和当事人紧张得不得了，我还是比较",{"id":159,"title":160,"thumbnail":161,"summary":162,"caseTypeId":38,"caseTypeName":163,"caseTypeCode":164},701,"L某涉嫌对非国家工作人员行贿罪530余万，四川卓安律所钟灵柔律师为其辩护，法院未判该罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F2db72e2b-5ffe-48ee-9741-c25d3b8f80e0.png","检察院指控两罪：虚开增值税专用发票罪，税额6998余万；对非国家工作人员，530余万。 隔了半年后开二庭，检察院坚持不变更起诉，我和当事人仍然坚持做对非公行贿罪无罪，虚开罪辩逃税罪的辩护。 休庭后经审判委员会讨论决定，最终法院仅判决虚开一项","职务犯罪优秀案例","duty_crime",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":168,"summary":169,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},700,"L某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，法院采纳辩护意见，对部分指控事实不予认定，量刑较同案主犯减轻30%","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe0d0c90e-5703-44a7-bf9e-ba1f77bc340a.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：开设赌场罪 结果：法院采纳辩护意见，对部分指控事实不予认定，量刑较同案减轻30% 亮点： 1. 成功推翻2022年12月23日前的涉案金额指控（减少认定违法所得14.7万元） 2. 通过证据对抗实现 ",7,"网络新型犯罪优秀案例","cyber_crime",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},699,"XX涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获降低量刑至最低刑期","罪名 ：开设赌场罪 结果 ：一审判决 有期徒刑 一年（检察机关量刑建议一年）， 罚金 人民币三千元 亮点 ：成功降低量刑幅度至法定最低刑（基准刑五年以下，实际判处一年） 通过证据审查否定\"股东身份\"\"管理职责\"等加重情节指控 自首情节精准认",{"id":178,"title":179,"thumbnail":10,"summary":180,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},698,"W某涉嫌熊猫麻将开设赌场罪，在检察院量刑实刑情况下，四川卓安律师事务所律师团队为其辩护获轻判缓刑","律师工作： 1.拿到案卷之后先阅卷，发现案件突破点：主犯、犯罪金额 2.立马写好法律意见，跟法院、检察院当面沟通法律意见，表达律师诉求 3.对当事人进行全面辅导，证据分析，阐述律师的辩护方案，并对当事人进行庭前辅导 4.搜集当事人罪轻证据，",{"id":182,"title":183,"thumbnail":10,"summary":184,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},697,"W某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案,四川卓安律师事务所律师团队经过不懈努力，未变更罪名从轻处罚","一、【案情简述】 被告等人以营利为目的，组建聊天群组，通过“熊猫麻将”“悦穆”等手机软件组织他人赌博并抽头渔利，被告等人明知他人 开设赌场 而为其提供财务管理、抽头渔利、赌资结算等帮助，经法院认定为构成 开设赌场罪 。 二、【辩护思路】 经",{"id":186,"title":187,"thumbnail":188,"summary":189,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},696,"L某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，在法定刑框架内为当事人争取最优结果","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fcd0d4300-bc88-4251-a9ff-f95f54f3de33.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：开设赌场罪 结果：法院采纳从犯认定、认罪认罚等辩护意见，在公诉机关建议刑期（五年）基础上未加重处罚，并判处罚金二万元。 亮点： 1. 通过精细化数据比对（占股比例、投注金额、分红金额等），成功论证当事",{"id":191,"title":192,"thumbnail":193,"summary":194,"caseTypeId":170,"caseTypeName":171,"caseTypeCode":172},695,"H某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，四川卓安律师事务所律师为其辩护，获从轻处罚","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fccfbf910-e1fb-4252-baf9-2c8cf90dea2a.png","一、案件结果、亮点、焦点、封面语 罪名：开设赌场罪 结果：有期徒刑6年6个月（较指控刑期降低40%），罚金60万元 亮点： 成功否定\"犯罪集团首要分子\"的加重情节认定 通过司法会计鉴定质证核减涉案金额近亿元 跨境电子证据合法性辩护获法庭采纳",[196,199,204,207,210,215,218,224],{"id":38,"code":164,"name":163,"summary":197,"keywords":198},"覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":200,"name":201,"summary":202,"keywords":203},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":120,"name":119,"summary":205,"keywords":206},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":152,"name":151,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":211,"name":212,"summary":213,"keywords":214},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":170,"code":172,"name":171,"summary":216,"keywords":217},"覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":225,"code":226,"name":227,"summary":228,"keywords":229},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":241,"lawyer":245},831,"2026-10-27 10:29:19",82,"西昌市看守所","诈骗罪","2026年10月20日 张津川 诈骗罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fe894f1b9-c858-4fb5-a101-1ae3b44dc208.png","2026-10-20 11:27:15","张津川",[242],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[247,250,263,275,286],{"id":232,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":234,"city":235,"caseType":236,"title":237,"thumbnail":238,"content":10,"publishTime":239,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":240,"lawyers":248},[249],{"id":234,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":240,"position":243,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":244,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":251,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":252,"city":253,"caseType":254,"title":255,"thumbnail":256,"content":10,"publishTime":257,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":258,"lawyers":259},830,83,"绵阳市涪城区人民检察院","职务侵占罪","2026年10月20日 吴亮 职务侵占罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F4340bc0c-447e-4dae-a2e4-8e68069399e7.png","2026-10-20 11:26:17","吴亮",[260],{"id":252,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":258,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":262,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2a4e2cca-a0b3-4bbe-b5ed-dc0d91aec070.jpg",{"id":264,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":265,"city":266,"caseType":267,"title":268,"thumbnail":269,"content":10,"publishTime":270,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":271,"lawyers":272},829,78,"重庆市九龙坡区人民法院","开设赌场罪","2026年10月20日 彭栖伟 开设赌场罪——卓安（重庆）律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F8e9a02bf-330a-483f-875f-b9e94a610ec0.png","2026-10-20 11:25:36","彭栖伟",[273],{"id":265,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":274,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fe7e138d0-374e-40f4-8a64-17f2eaa16ca6.jpg",{"id":276,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":236,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},828,50,"成都市龙泉驿区看守所","2026年10月20日 丁平 诈骗罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002F34ad0be4-0cc2-4ce1-876c-1bb0b2837f62.png","2026-10-20 11:24:58","丁平",[284],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":282,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":285,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002Fa9064de6-ed2e-474c-82dc-e8805483d87a.jpg",{"id":287,"createdAt":233,"updatedAt":233,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":288,"city":289,"caseType":290,"title":291,"thumbnail":292,"content":10,"publishTime":293,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":294,"lawyers":295},827,44,"彭州市看守所","利用迷信破坏法律实施罪","2026年10月20日 宁得宇 利用迷信破坏法律实施罪——卓安律师事务所","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fbab16de0-23a5-4dbb-bd9a-e78176788977.png","2026-10-20 11:24:14","宁得宇",[296],{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":294,"position":261,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":297,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F88cf054d-ca57-4c31-be35-19492c99381d.jpg",73,[],[301,306,311,316,321,326],{"id":40,"createdAt":302,"updatedAt":303,"deleted":31,"code":304,"name":305,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-10-27 15:19:16","XINGSHIHEGUI","服务品质",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":307,"deleted":31,"code":308,"name":309,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":310,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:14:17","criminal","服务范围","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":312,"deleted":31,"code":313,"name":314,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":315,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:18:16","key_crime","服务方式","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":317,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":320,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-10-27 15:16:50","corporate","服务流程","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg",{"id":170,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":43,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:30:32","2026-10-13 16:30:42","fuwutiyan","服务体验",{"id":219,"createdAt":327,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":32,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-10-13 16:31:42","2026-10-27 15:20:09","fuwushoufei","服务收费原则","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[333,336,339,342],{"value":334,"label":335},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":337,"label":338},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":340,"label":341},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":343,"label":344},"6","全国分所",[346,349,352],{"title":347,"desc":348},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":350,"desc":351},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":353,"desc":354},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":356,"description":13,"keywords":357,"canonical":358,"image":10,"jsonLd":359},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[360],{"@context":361,"@graph":362},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[363,369],{"@type":364,"@id":365,"url":358,"name":7,"inLanguage":366,"publisher":367},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":370,"@id":368,"name":7,"url":358,"logo":371,"image":371,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":366,"address":372,"geo":375,"department":377},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":374},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":376,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[378,383,387,391,395,399],{"@type":379,"@id":380,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":381,"parentOrganization":382},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":384,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":385,"parentOrganization":386},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":388,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":389,"parentOrganization":390},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":392,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":393,"parentOrganization":394},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":396,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":397,"parentOrganization":398},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":368},{"@type":379,"@id":400,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":401,"parentOrganization":402},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":373,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":368},{"entity":404,"seo":416},{"id":405,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":407,"title":408,"thumbnail":409,"content":410,"publishTime":411,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":412},1103,"2026-10-27 15:09:26",11,"国企负责人签过字， 就要为全部问题担责吗？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fcb750fb1-143d-4c1c-bf08-dc58b37b16a1.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">国企项目被查，办案人员提出“你签过字，不可能不知道”，并不意\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">味\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">着本人已被证明对全部问题知情。签字需要认真解释，但刑事责任仍要对应具体行为、主观认识和证据；真实不知情、疏于审核与明知参与，处理路径不同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">本文结合现行监察与刑事法律规则、团队办理的国企改制案件，说明怎样把岗位、审批和实际参与范围核对清楚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">签的是哪一版文件，签字时能看到哪些内容？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">哪些事情当时知道，哪些后来才听说？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">没有参与收钱，是否仍存在履职方面的风险？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">当前可以先整理争议事项、签批过程及原始材料，由律师评估风险和补充核查方向；面对调查如实说明，不因反复追问而\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">猜\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">认事实，也不把“不知情”当作无需解释的结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">一、被追问签字时，先弄清究竟在问什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">签过字是需要查明的事实，能否据此认定知情，要看签字指向的具体事项以及其他证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">“项目付款单上有我的签字，但承办人私下虚报、收钱的部分，我确实没有参与。现在说我是负责人，怎么可能不知道，我该怎么解释？”这类困\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">惑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">通常出现在审计问题移送、巡视巡察后的核查，或者监察机关已经展开调查时。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">这时最容易把几件事\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">混\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">成一句“我对项目负责”。实际需要核对的是：是否知道项目存在，是否知道这次付款，是否知道申报内容虚假，是否知道资金会被个人占有。对正常业务的了解，不能直接替代对其中违法安排的认识；但如果签批文件已经明确显示异常，也不能只用“没经办”回避说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">还要听清“应当知道”的含义。它可能是在追问已经知情的证据，也可能是在追问负责人是否尽到审核义务。前者涉及有没有故意参与，后者涉及有没有严重失职，两条判断不能\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">混\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">具体处境\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">需要查清的事实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"219\">优先核对的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">只了解正常业务\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">虚假内容是否被隐瞒，有无其他渠道获知\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"219\">签批版本、附件及真实汇报记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">发现异常仍同意办理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">知道哪些异常，作过什么核实或安排\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"219\">风险提示、回复及后续审批记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"139\">没有认真履行审核职责\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"230\">有无审核义务、实际履职条件与损失联系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"219\">岗位制度、审核过程及损失材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">这张表只帮助确定核查方向，不能据此直接定罪或排除责任。本人当前要做的是把被追问的\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">那\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">笔款、\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">那\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">次审批说具体，避免对整个项目作\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">笼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">统承认或\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">笼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">统否认。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">二、调查可以提出怀疑，责任仍要用证据判断\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">办案机关可以围绕签字提出疑问，但还需要核实疑问；本人提出的有利事实也属于核查范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）签字可以成为证据，不能跳过它究竟证明什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第四十三条要求收集有无违法犯罪以及情节轻重的证据。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第六十七条、第六十八条进一步要求全面、客观取证，结合证据之间的联系综合判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">据此，审批单能证明本人批准过什么，还要看其文字、附件、形成过程及实际履行。只有首页签名，不能当然说明本人阅读过事后增加的附件；如果同时存在事前商议、异常提示和指令记录，签字的证明作用也会随之改变。这是结合具体事实作出的证据分析，并非一条“有签字就有罪”或“没经办就无罪”的规则。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）不知情与没有尽责，应分别评估\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">《中华人民共和国刑法》第十四条、第十五条区分故意和过失。对共同贪污等故意犯罪，需要查明共同故意及实际行为，不能用岗位上的审核义务替代犯罪故意。《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十五条、第三百八十二条是相应判断依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">如果没有证据证明本人知道他人在侵\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">吞\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">公款，仍需检查是否存在严重不负责任、滥用职权及其与重大损失的联系。《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百六十八条规定了相应刑事责任。一\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">般\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">审核疏漏、经营损失与该条规定的犯罪并不能直接画等号，还要逐项核对主体、职责、行为、损失和因果关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（三）没有直接承认，也可能根据客观证据认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">知情不只通过本人供述证明。真实的会议记录、通讯内容、资金安排、持续参与方式，都可能支持或者削弱对知情的判断。没有本人承认，不等于无法认定；本人承认了，也仍需有其他证据核实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第十二条规定，未经人民法院依法判决不得确定有罪；第五十五条规定定罪证据标准。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第七十条要求，职务犯罪调查终结时，对所认定事实排除合理怀疑，证据不足不得移送审查起诉。这是调查终结、定罪时的标准，不能误解为开始核查或采取调查措施前就须达到同样程度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">三、国企改制案中，团队怎样审查整体指控\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">项目被整体指控后，仍要分别审查行为性质、数额证据和个人作用，不能只争论“负责人该不该负责”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">在成安律师团队办理的一起历史国企破产改制案件中，某公司董事长F某被指控伙同他人，将原属国有的\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">宿舍\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">、食堂等价值1581万余元的资产转入新设公司，被以贪污罪追诉。该数额是指控所涉资产金额，不能直接当作法院最终认定的金额。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">团队围绕两方面提出意见。一方面，审查资产处置的实际性质，提出不构成贪污、即便构罪也更符合私分国有资产罪特征及相应追诉时效的意见；另一方面，核对评估报告等证据，指出金额认定存在矛盾和不明确之处，并提出从犯、坦白、积极退赃等从宽意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">法院采纳了部分辩护意见，最终仍认定F某犯贪污罪，判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年。因此，不能把该案写成无罪结果，也不能说法院认可了全部定性意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">这个案件与“签字是否足以证明知情”并非同一争点。它能说明的是，面对一项整体指控，法律服务仍可把资产性质、金额证据和个人作用分开审查；它不能证明签字人当然不知情，更不能据此预测其他案件会适用缓刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">对正在被问询的国企负责人，当前可借鉴的动作是：把每项争议落实到具体事项和材料。承认真实参与的部分，对确实未参与、\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">尚\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">不清楚或有材料矛盾的部分分别说明，不把整项指控一次性概括成自己的责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">四、说清未参与的部分，重点核对四件事\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">有说服力的说明，应当让人能够顺着材料核查。以下四项帮助还原事实，不是供人背\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">诵\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">的回答口径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）审查要点一，签字对应的究竟是哪份文件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">先查清签名真实性、签署日期、文件版本、签字栏含义和当时附件。签字是在批准付款、确认收到材料，还是同意启动程序，证明的内容不同；本人实际看到的资料也要分别说明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">核对时，将原始审批单与系统流转记录、附件清单、修改痕迹对应。对“附件不可能没看”的疑问，应提供当时文件如何送达、是否分批补交等核查线索。本人确实有审核义务却未阅读，也应如实说明，不能把未阅读写成自动免责理由。适用依据为《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第六十七条、第六十八条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）审查要点二，知道问题的时间是否被混在一起\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">把项目启动、本人签字、问题行为发生、首次获悉异常和采取措施的时间分别列明。事后知道的情况，不能不加区分地写成签字时已经知道；事后补签，也不能当然证明事前没有指令或参与。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">可将原始邮件、工作记录、行程和通知时间相互比对。对某一事项只知道大概、不记得准确日期的，应说明记\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">忆\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">范围和可核查来源，不随意\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">填\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">一个日期。如果办案人员认为此前已被汇报，就具体核查何人、何时、以何种方式汇报及内容。《中华人民共和国刑法》第十四条和证据综合判断规则，是区分知情时间与行为性质的依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（三）审查要点三，未亲自经办是否仍有共同安排\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">未去现场、未接触现金，都不足以单独排除共同犯罪。需要核对是否商议过虚报、授意他人办理、明知异常仍提供批准，以及共同故意是否覆盖争议事项。另一方面，也不能仅因本人职务最高，就将他人的全部行为算到本人名下。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">应将每一争议事项的汇报、指令、审批与资金去向对应起来。若证据显示本人参与整体违法安排，不知道每一笔准确数额未必排除相应责任；若确有超出共同故意范围的独立行为，则应具体审查。依据是《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十五条、第二十六条、第三百八十二条，不能只按实际分到的钱计算责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（四）审查要点四，未参与侵吞之外有没有履职风险\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">应回到当时有效的职责规定，核对本人应审什么、能否发现异常、曾收到哪些提醒、是否具备制止或纠正条件，以及损失实际怎样发生。不能把工作中“应该管”简单转换成“已经知道他人在犯罪”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">将岗位分工、授权文件、专业部门意见与本人后续处置对照。已有审核或提示记录，需要说明针对的风险和实际作用；没有履职的部分，也要据实评估。对严重失职的刑事判断应依《中华人民共和国刑法》第十五条、第一百六十八条核查，不能仅凭“没有分到钱”排除，也不能仅凭项目\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">亏\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">损认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">五、本人和家属现在可以做什么\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">当前最有用的是准确陈述、保存原始材料和确认程序阶段，针对性咨询可以从这些工作开始。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（一）本人先整理一份争议事项清单\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">按事项记下本人职务、签批内容、当时已知事实、实际动作以及能够核查的材料。把亲自经历、他人告知和个人推测分开；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">暂\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">时记不清的列为待核事项，不将\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">猜\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">测写成确定事实。这份梳理用于帮助准确说明，不能替代正式取证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">谈话时听清具体问题，如实说明真实经过。笔录若把“后来听说”写成“事先知道”，应指出具体位置并请求更正。《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第八十五条规定了笔录核对与更正，第九十条、第九十一条规定讯问中的辩解记录、核查及相关要求。已经签认后发现差错，也应及时说明错误位置、原因和核查线索，不能为了前后表面一致继续维持错误。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（二）家属只整理依法能够取得的材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">家属可保存已合法持有的通知、家庭通讯及相关个人资料，注明来源、时间和用途。单位档案、审批系统数据不在家属权限内的，提供所在单位和保管部门线索，不能借用账户越权下载，更不能擅自复制涉密资料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">需要核实同事是否知道某事时，可向办案机关提出人员和事项线索，不能由家属组织大家证明“不知情”，或要求承办人改变说法。正常法律咨询、依法提交材料与串供是不同性质的行为。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（三）签过字、提出异议，都不等于必然留置\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">《中华人民共和国监察法》第二十四条第一款规定，留置须以涉嫌严重职务违法或者职务犯罪、已掌握部分事实及证据、仍有重要问题需查明为基础，并具有案情重大复杂、可能逃\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">跑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">自杀、可能串供毁证等法定情形之一，经依法审批。不能只凭“签过字”判断会否留置，也不能仅因配合调查就保证不会留置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">围绕真实事实提出具体说明，并非当然属于妨碍调查。需要避免的是编造、\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">篡\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">改材料，串通说法，威胁、利诱相关人员，以及隐匿、毁灭证据等行为。这些动作可能增加程序和实体风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>（四）现在可以咨询律师，服务内容要与阶段相符\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">监察调查期间，律师可结合本人或家属合法提供的信息，协助评估岗位风险、梳理知情时间和材料线索，说明合法陈述及反映问题的路径。现行监察制度没有建立与普通刑事侦查相同的律师会见、阅卷制度，不能承诺直接进入留置场所核对笔录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">移送审查起诉后，辩护律师依《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条开展相应会见、阅卷等工作，再依据完整案卷检验签字、汇报和资金证据。调查结束前，依《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》第二百一十七条核对涉嫌违法犯罪事实时，本人仍可提出具体申辩，成立的应予采纳。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">在成都寻找这类法律服务，可以围绕同一个问题咨询：哪些材料能还原签字时的知情范围，哪些材料还需依法调取，是否另有履职责任。带上争议事项清单、合法持有的签批材料和任职职责资料，就能让首次沟通更具体。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">条文与案例来源索引\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">1. \u003C\u002Fspan>《中华人民共和国监察法》\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">，2024年12月25日修正，相关修改自2025年6月1日起施行；第二十四条第一款、第四十三条、第五十条。国家市场监督管理总局公开全文。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">2. \u003C\u002Fspan>《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">，2025年4月27日修订，2025年6月1日公布施行；第六十七条、第六十八条、第七十条、第八十五条、第九十条、第九十一条、第二百一十七条。国家市场监督管理总局公开全文。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">3. \u003C\u002Fspan>《中华人民共和国刑法》\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">，第十四条、第十五条、第二十五条、第二十六条、第一百六十八条、第三百八十二条；国家市场监督管理总局公开条文，并结合刑法修正案核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">4. \u003C\u002Fspan>《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">，2018年第三次修正；第十二条、第三十四条、第三十九条、第四十条、第五十五条。国家市场监督管理总局公开全文。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">5. 经授权使用的脱敏团队案例：某公司董事长F某国企改制贪污案。本文分别标明指控金额、辩护意见及裁判结果，不将其作为签字人不知情的直接先例。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">附 卓安在本问题上的服务积累与刑事风控委员会\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">服务积累：团队办理过国企改制、职务犯罪相关案件，围绕资产性质、金额证据与个人作用提出意见；成安律师有公职人员履职风险研究积累，帮助将岗位职责与具体行为对应分析。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安刑事风控委员会：由成安律师领衔，面向公职人员、国企管理人员开展风险识别与危机应对。针对签字被追问知情的处境，可围绕职责、签批过程和真实知情范围提供咨询，区分故意参与与履职风险，并按程序阶段确定后续工作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\">免责声明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">本文仅供参考，不构成针对任何具体案件的正式法律意见，也不构成案件结果承诺。文中案例已作必要脱敏处理，具体事实和处理结果以相应完整资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 仿宋;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-27 15:09:05",{"id":407,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":413,"deleted":31,"code":414,"name":415,"icon":32,"sort":225,"status":6,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32},"2026-10-21 17:06:00","CA","成安博士专栏",{"title":417,"description":418,"keywords":32,"canonical":419,"image":409,"jsonLd":420},"国企负责人签过字， 就要为全部问题担责吗？ - 成安博士专栏 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 【核心结论】 国企项目被查，办案人员提出“你签过字，不可能不知道”，并不意 味 着本人已被证明对全部问题知情。签字需要认真解释，但刑事责任仍要对应具体行为、主观认识和证据；真实不知情、疏于审核与明知参与，处理路径不同。 本文结合现行监察与刑事法律规则、团队办理的国企改制案件，说明怎样把岗位、审批和实际参与范围","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA\u002F1103",[421],{"@context":361,"@graph":422},[423,430],{"@type":424,"@id":419,"url":419,"headline":408,"description":418,"datePublished":425,"dateModified":426,"author":427,"publisher":428,"articleSection":415,"inLanguage":366,"image":429},"Article","2026-10-27T15:09:05+08:00","2026-10-27T15:09:26+08:00",{"@id":368},{"@id":368},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F10\u002F27\u002Fcb750fb1-143d-4c1c-bf08-dc58b37b16a1.jpg",{"@type":431,"itemListElement":432},"BreadcrumbList",[433,436,438],{"@type":434,"position":6,"name":435,"item":358},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":434,"position":38,"name":415,"item":437},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002FCA",{"@type":434,"position":35,"name":408,"item":419}]