[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-628":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,164,168,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},345,"H某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获从轻量刑","一、案情简介 H某任某公司的控股股东、法定代表人。2017年下半年，该公司对外宣传两款基金项目，通过成立有限合伙企业的方式，由业务员对外介绍、公司开宣传会等形式在成都、昆明等地吸引投资人投资，并承诺10%的保底收益。经查，该两项目对外非法吸","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},344,"C某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判  ","一、案情简介 成都市武侯区人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人白某某、陈某共谋盗窃柴油，并商议由白某某负责盗窃柴油，陈某负责收购转卖，后白某某又邀约被告人陈某丽、廖某某参加盗窃，涉嫌盗窃罪。 二、办案过程 卓安团队接受当事人的委托，指派律师担任本",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},343,"L某涉嫌招摇撞骗罪一案，团队律师为其成功辩护，获轻判拘役三个月","一、案情简介 L，四川人，2009年10月，在Z某的提议下，与T、Z四人冒充劳动保障部门工作人员到外地以进行劳动宣传为幌子高价推销劳动书。为营造身为劳动部门工作人员的假象，T、Z还专门制作了某市劳动保障宣传证，L、Z制作了某市劳动部门保障宣",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},342,"G某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，未变更罪名从轻宣判","一、案情简介 高某作为上海浦发银行成都分行某支行的的行长及主办客户经理，未按照相关规定进行贷前进行现场调查、审核贷款资质、条件等的情况下，制作虚假贷前调查报告，隐瞒贷款用途和各公司的实际经营状况，审议授信贷款金额共计143000万元，实际用",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},341,"L某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其作罪轻辩护 ","一、案情简介 2006年至2011年，被告人刘某利用其担任成都市金堂县相关领导等职务上的便利，为他人谋取利益，多次非法收受他人人民币现金共计44.5万元。 二、办案过程 辩护人在接受被告人亲属委托后，多次到看守所会见被告人，为刘某带去家属的",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},340,"W某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 被告人魏某某担任某公司主管，在明知公司存在赚取客户亏损提成的情况下，冒充指导老师，指导客户操作，故意让客户亏钱，以赚取客户手续费和亏损的业务提成。经查实，该公司在魏某某担任主管期间通过上述手段共造成被害人侯某某等亏损达人民币5",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},339,"经老乡介绍在非正规工厂生产假水泥，W某被控参与生产销售伪劣产品58万余元，一审法院采纳团队律师辩护意见，轻判W某两年有期徒刑","一、案情简介 W某系资阳人，因家中女儿考上研究生、儿子年幼上学等，生活情况困难外出务工。2011年11月中旬在老乡的介绍下到成都市W区某生产水泥的一个小作坊工作，该作坊通过掺入其他材料的方式生产水泥，在此期间W某除了生病请假外一直按照工头的",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},338,"某县县长L某涉嫌受贿180万元，团队律师为其辩护一审辩护从轻处罚判处有期徒刑10年半","一、案情简介 L从基层工作，几十年来从一般工作人员到县长。近年来过年过节期间，收受现金和礼物，被控受贿180万元。 被告人L某是某县的县长，其从基层做起，几十年来为当地做出了较大贡献，辩护律师在访谈期间经常可以听到民众对其赞赏有加。L某经过",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},337,"W某涉嫌伪造公司印章罪一案，团队律师为其成功辩护，数罪并罚获轻判拘役六个月","一、案情简介 王某在C市J区开了一家汽修部，出了车祸到这里修理的车辆很多当时只是小擦挂，事故当时没有报警，时候开不到证明，还有一些车辆因为单位垮了，车辆过户需要开证明。王某为了满足客户的要求找到一名专门伪造公章的那字，由王熊提供所要伪造的公",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},336,"D某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款，团队律师为其做罪轻辩护  ","一、案情简介 2014年4月至2014年11月期间，杨某某、周某某为筹集资金用于F市某旅游开发有限公司的项目建设以及归还借款，在戢某某的指使下，在C市J区成立四川某投资有限责任公司。该公司由杨某某担任公司法定代表人，周某某担任出纳并负责收支",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},335,"T某涉嫌敲诈勒索、妨害公务罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻刑","一、案情简介 2010年 8月4日唐某、黄某某因涉嫌敲诈勒索、妨害公务犯罪被成都市公安局金牛区分局刑事拘留，同年9月10日被执行速捕，再押于成都市看守所。成都市金牛区人民检察院于2010年9月27日以敲诈勒索、妨害公务犯罪起诉至成都市金牛区",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},334,"H某涉嫌开设赌场罪、容留他人吸毒罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市温江区人民检察院以《起诉书》指控何某利用翻牌机，以营利为目的开设赌场，并在该赌场内容留赌客吸食毒品，其行为已触犯《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百零三、三百五十四条的规定，应当以开设赌场罪、容留他人吸毒罪追究其刑事责任，并向成",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":10,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},333,"K某非法吸收公众存款一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 根据检察院指控： 2011年9月，秦某某、张某某注册成立了深圳市某某股权投资基金管理有限公司，张某某系某某公司法定代表人。同年11月，在成都注册了分公司，蒋某某任实际负责人。从2012年3月开始，某某公司陆续发行“某某矿业基金",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":171,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},332,"C某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F54fd81cd-e4af-48bc-8902-17bc79d0f512.png","一、案情简介 2018年3月16 日至 2019 年8月27日，被告人Z某1、C某、Z某2分别在西宁XXX房地产开发有限公司、西宁XXX房地产开发有限公司任助理总经理、营销总监、营销副总监期间，利用职务便利将该公司正常出售的XXX房源进行预",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},331,"Y某嫌盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，未变更罪名从轻宣判","一、案情简介 2014年3月6日，阳某借用资阳承露园林工程有限公司名义与资阳开发区投资有限公司签订树木移栽工程施工合同，将属于国有资产的原金德管业厂区内部分苗木，移栽到资阳市雁江区现代大道的资阳经济开发区管委会，工期约 2 个月，阳某为整个",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},628,"2026-09-22 20:26:50","征拆现场有冲突，负责干部被说成是涉黑保护伞，哪些事实能说清？ | 公职人员刑事危机应对","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F07cfb8d7-13c6-414f-a713-a3f94e1a28bb.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">征拆干部被控包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪的核心出罪前提，在于阻断其对拆迁方“涉黑本质”的主观明知。辩护关键在于立足项目推进的行政考核背景，证明默许清场系追求工期的履职过失而非庇护黑恶的恶意联络，并借拆迁团伙不具备涉黑法定特征剥离依附前提，依法将案件降格为普通渎职或行政处\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fd2a45fcc-bb05-49c1-a76e-a3cf45773ddc.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">分。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在近年的城市更新、棚户区改造以及重大产业园区土地收储过程中，征拆提速往往被列为地方经济发展的硬性指标。面对严格的倒排工期与招商引资协议违约风险，负责一线征拆与城建协调的领导干部，常年处在多重压力的夹缝之中。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当拆迁实施单位为了清场进度，暗中雇佣社会闲散人员，采取断水断电、堵门砸窗、围堵恐吓乃至暴力强拆等过激手段时，部分地方干部因急于完成考核，往往选择“睁一只眼闭一只眼”，甚至要求基层对居民报警“缓一缓再处理”，并依照维稳考核惯性将受害群众的连续信访视作“非正常上访”予以稳控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">一旦这些实施暴力的拆迁企业或外包打手团伙在常态化扫黑除恶中被立案查处，办案机关为了深挖彻查背后的“关系网”与“保护伞”，极易顺藤摸瓜将负责征拆的主管官员以《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十四条第三款规定的“包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪”立案调查。此时，行政过错与刑事重罪的界限往往被急剧压缩。涉案干部及其家属最迫切需要厘清的，便是一套客观严密的系统性诊断与救济路径。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、定性诊断：被控“纵容黑恶”还是“履职不当”，界分的核心关卡在何处？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>政绩考核重压与主观庇护黑恶的心理阻断\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪是故意犯罪。司法审判中认定该罪名的法定要件，是被告人主观上必须“明知”对方是从事有组织违法犯罪的黑社会性质组织，客观上仍利用职权予以包庇或纵容。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">然而在大量征迁引发的案件中，地方干部的核心动机往往是“为了公家办事”。上有招商引资项目的落地考核，下有财政资金拆借的时间成本，投资方动辄以“土地交付逾期即撤资”施压。在此背景下，城建干部默许拆迁公司采取非正规手段，其内心追求的是“尽快拿到净地以交付项目”，属于极端政绩冲动驱动下的行政违规。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">卓安律师事务所首席律师成安博士在分析涉黑与职务犯罪交叉疑难案件时指出：在职务行为与涉黑指控交织的特殊情境中，司法审查最忌讳脱离体制运行的现实语境搞“唯结果论”推定。绝不能因为客观上发生了暴力清场且主管领导未予严厉制止，就反向推定该领导在主观上形成了包庇黑恶势力的犯罪故意。证明官员不知悉拆迁公司深层涉黑背景、未参与策划暴力行动，是切断主观犯意联络的关键突破口。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>前罪依附性审查：拆迁团伙若不构黑，纵容罪名如何皮之不存？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪是一类具有极强从属性的犯罪。该罪名成立的法律基石，是其所包庇、纵容的实体对象在法律评价上必须确凿无疑地构成“黑社会性质组织”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在司法实践中，拆迁领域的冲突往往呈现群体性、突发性与偶发性。很多拆迁公司纠集闲散人员实施暴力，本质上是为了在单一商业项目中快速达成拆迁协议以赚取工程款。此类团伙往往缺乏严密的层级纪律，不具备长期在特定区域或行业形成非法控制的“危害性特征”，更没有稳定的组织沉淀。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">根据现行法律规范，如果辩护工作能够将拆迁团伙的定性从“黑社会性质组织”依法打掉，即便该团伙最终被认定为恶势力犯罪集团、恶势力团伙或普通聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事共同犯罪，公职人员的涉黑包庇纵容指控也将彻底丧失法定前提。因为中国刑法并未将“包庇、纵容恶势力”规定为独立罪名。一旦脱去涉黑外衣，相关行为至多被纳入普通渎职或行政纪律处分范畴，刑期与社会评价将发生根本性逆转。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、行为拆解：拆迁现场的不作为与压制维稳，能否直接推定为“庇护手段”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>“有案不立”的职责边界与行政管辖争议\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">办案机关指控征拆干部纵容黑恶的常见依据之一，是群众遭暴力拆迁报警或投诉后，主管领导曾向下属执法部门或属地派出所“打招呼”，导致案件未及时立案查处。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">辩护审查必须深入到具体的职责权限与线索流转路径中去：\u003Cbr>第一，主管城建或征收的行政官员并非公安机关侦查人员，其不具备决定刑事案件立案与否的法定职权；\u003Cbr>第二，在诸多拆迁纠纷初期，拆迁户与拆迁公司往往存在旷日持久的补偿协议拉锯战。行政机关在接到强拆线索时，往往容易受商事纠纷思维的局限，误以为这属于民事清场瑕疵或合同违约纠纷，从而引导当事人走行政复议或民事诉讼途径。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通俗来讲，这就是指：分不清行政部门的协调权限与公安机关的刑事立案管辖，是基层行政运作的常见通病。不能把行政机关在复杂民刑交叉纠纷中的认知局限、推诿扯皮或协调不力，机械等同于公职人员故意利用手中职权阻挠刑事立案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>将搬迁群众信访定性为“非访”，是维稳惯性还是包庇黑恶？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">另一项极具杀伤力的控方指控，是官员为了掩盖拆迁暴力，动用维稳力量将上访群众列为重点人员甚至实施行政拘留，被控方认定为“利用行政权力打压受害者、为黑恶势力张目”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">剖析此类行为，必须正视基层治理中扭曲的“一票否决”考核机制。许多负责拆迁的专班干部面临着极为严苛的信访属地责任考核。上级部门对进京、访省频次设定了近乎刚性的通报与问责红线。干部对上访群众进行劝返、稳控甚至采取过激的限制手段，其驱动力绝大多数来源于对自身职务安全和政绩考核的焦虑，其目的是为了“保住帽子”，而非受黑恶势力指使或图谋助长黑恶势力气焰。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">这种行政异化虽然严重侵犯了群众的合法信访权利，应当受到政务处分乃至法律惩戒，但在刑法规范评价上，它属于典型的行政滥权，与公职人员沦为黑恶势力“看门人”的主观恶性存在本质差别。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、多维对照：涉黑保护伞与普通渎职行为的司法审查诊断矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">为了清晰界分“涉黑纵容罪”与“普通滥用职权\u002F玩忽职守罪”在司法审查中的证据边界，可结合以下核心诊断维度进行逐项排查：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查维度\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">控方涉黑“保护伞”指控模型\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">真实办案辩护阻断要点\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">可争取法定降格路径\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">主观认知\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">推定其明知拆迁团队系涉黑恶势力，仍默许甚至支持其违法手段。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">证明其仅知晓拆迁工作阻力大，以为对方仅系民事谈判施压，不知涉黑本质。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">排除涉黑包庇纵容主观故意，阻断刑法第294条适用。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">权力行使\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">动用公权力阻止公安出警、阻挠立案，为暴力清场扫清障碍。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查是否仅系因项目赶工期作出的不当行政协调，未滥用刑事司法干预权。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">排除徇私枉法共犯，向行政履职瑕疵或普通渎职方向靠拢。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">利益往来\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">认定官员与拆迁老板存在权钱交易、入股分红或长期经济利益捆绑。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">穿透银行资金流水，严格界分个人财产与公务往来，证明无利益勾连。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">阻断贪腐与庇护的因果闭环，争取免除涉黑关联追缴。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">对维稳的定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">指控官员将受害居民定性为“非访”并予以打击，系黑恶势力的庇护伞。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">还原基层“一票否决”考核重压，证明稳控系行政维稳惯性而非助恶。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">还原职务行为行政属性，排除黑恶组织犯罪共犯评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">拆迁方性质\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">将拆迁公司及其聘用打手直接认定为黑社会性质组织。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查拆迁团伙是否具备“四大特征”，重点打击其组织特征与非法控制力。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">拆迁方降格为恶势力或普通犯罪，包庇涉黑罪名自然瓦解。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通过上述矩阵的多维对比可以看出，辩护的核心并不在于否认行政管理上的不规范，而在于准确还原事实原貌，打破控方用“涉黑逻辑”剪裁行政行为的证据闭环。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、防御闭环：从留置应对到审判阶段的四步排查路径\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第一步：及时阻断犯意推定，厘清口供中的“心知肚明”与“法定明知”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在监察调查与留置初期，调查人员往往会针对官员的心理状态进行反复讯问，容易形成诸如“我知道他们社会关系复杂”、“我预料到他们可能会用硬手段”、“为了赶工期只能靠他们摆平”等笔录表述。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">这些口供极易在移送司法后被控方解读为“对涉黑暴力明知并纵容”的证据。在后续审查起诉阶段，辩护律师必须全面调取监察讯问同步录音录像，对照笔录原件展开穿透核实，引导当事人讲清当时的真实语境：\u003Cbr>所谓“手段硬”，是指商业谈判中的强势，还是指动用器械实施故意伤害？\u003Cbr>所谓“靠他们摆平”，是指拆迁公司依法加快签约，还是指放任其打砸民房？\u003Cbr>必须坚决将生活化的模糊认知，与刑法意义上对“黑社会性质组织违法犯罪行为”的确定性明知严格剥离开来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第二步：穿透经济往来，阻断项目提速与“受贿分肥”的逻辑混同\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉黑保护伞案件往往伴随着职务受贿的指控。如果负责征迁的领导干部客观上收受了拆迁企业负责人的财物，极易被直接推定为“因受贿而为其提供涉黑庇护”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">此时必须启动精准的资金穿透与性质剥离：\u003Cbr>其一，厘清款项性质，严格区分正当借贷、人情往来、公务接待垫资与受贿款项的边界；\u003Cbr>其二，即使个别行为涉嫌受贿，也必须严格核实请托事项的范围。受贿是为了帮助拆迁公司承揽工程标段、尽快拨付工程进度款，还是为了纵容其暴力伤人而不受刑事追究？\u003Cbr>受贿与涉黑包庇是两个独立的罪名。若请托事项仅仅是经济与工程层面的利益输送，则绝不能将受贿故意直接嫁接为包庇黑恶故意，必须坚持一码归一码，坚决阻止罪名在事实不清时发生重叠加码。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第三步：穿透合同转包链条，切断层级指示的因果关系\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">政府或平台公司在推进土地一级开发时，通常是通过公开招标将拆迁工程发包给具备合法资质的拆迁建筑公司。而真正实施半夜砸房、断电、殴打居民的，往往是资质公司在数次层层分包后，私下从社会上拉来的“地下清场队”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在证据审查中，必须全面调取征地拆迁的全部合同、会议纪要与施工方案：\u003Cbr>政府部门与一级施工单位签订的合同中，是否明确载明必须“依法依规、文明拆迁”？\u003Cbr>当暴力清场事件发生后，城建专班是否曾组织约谈、责令停工整顿或下达整改通知书？\u003Cbr>只要能够证明各级行政协议中严禁暴力、且官员对底层打手团伙的层层转包雇佣完全不知情，就能在法律因果关系上彻底切断领导干部指示与最终恶性结果之间的直接关联。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第四步：引入行刑衔接与综合治理视角，力争党纪政务处理替代刑事追责\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">根据现行《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》及相关处理公职人员涉黑涉恶违法犯罪的司法规范，各级司法机关在处理“保护伞”线索时，必须坚持宽严相济、罪责刑相适应原则，严格区分违法犯罪与工作失误。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">对于在土地征收、旧城改造等急难险重任务中，确系因工作方法简单粗暴、对相关行业监管不力、对矛盾化解不及时而造成群众利益受损，但主观上没有徇私庇护恶意、客观上未与黑恶分子同流合污的干部，应当充分调取其以往一贯的廉洁从政表现、项目推进的集体决策背景以及事后积极采取的补救安置措施。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">向承办检察官提交详实的《建议不起诉法律意见书》及履职合规证据，论证其行为虽然违反行政纪律、构成履职瑕疵，但尚未跨越刑事犯罪的入罪门槛，积极争取案件在审查起诉阶段依据《刑事诉讼法》第一百七十七条依法作不起诉处理，并通过检察意见书移交纪检监察机关作党纪政务从轻处分，化解刑事风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在常态化扫黑除恶的深远背景下，整肃公职人员队伍、坚决铲除“保护伞”是捍卫法治尊严的应有之义。然而，越是面对错综复杂的征迁历史遗留问题与政绩考核机制，司法机关越应当保持理性的司法克制，恪守罪刑法定的铁律。不能将基层干部在推进地方发展过程中的行政失当、维稳惯性以及对民事纠纷的处置瑕疵，不加甄别地拔高推演为包庇黑恶势力的犯罪行为。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">正如卓安律师事务所首席律师成安博士所强调的，职务涉黑辩护的最高价值，在于穿透层层掩盖的行政考评表象与机械指控逻辑，把干部的政绩冲动与黑恶庇护剥离开来，把前置主体的涉恶涉黑虚胖定性挤压出去。唯有依托严密的事实比对、清醒的法理辨析与专业的程序把控，才能在防范国家工作人员被“指标化扩大打击”的同时，真正守住实体公正与程序正义的法治底线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专案研判支持：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>学术与实务指导：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 成安博士（卓安律师事务所首席律师、法学博士、原省级公安厅特聘专家顾问）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>协同办案机制：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依托卓安“控、辩、审、学”四维实战研判体系（原法官、原检察官与法学学者集体论证）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>核心业务标签：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 近30年刑事法律实务经验 | 百人级刑事专业律师团队 | 刑事风控与合规 | 刑事危机应对与化解 | 重大疑难刑事案件辩护\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 20:25:34",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"征拆现场有冲突，负责干部被说成是涉黑保护伞，哪些事实能说清？ | 公职人员刑事危机应对 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","征拆干部被控包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪的核心出罪前提，在于阻断其对拆迁方“涉黑本质”的主观明知。辩护关键在于立足项目推进的行政考核背景，证明默许清场系追求工期的履职过失而非庇护黑恶的恶意联络，并借拆迁团伙不具备涉黑法定特征剥离依附前提，依法将案件降格为普通渎职或行政处 分。 在近年的城市更新、棚户区改造以及重大产业园区","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F628",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"NewsArticle","2026-09-22T20:25:34+08:00","2026-09-22T20:26:50+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F07cfb8d7-13c6-414f-a713-a3f94e1a28bb.png",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]