[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-regulation-606":615},{"entity":4,"seo":567},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":181,"caseIntro":228,"latestLawyerNews":229,"lawyerNews":244,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":300,"serviceTags":301,"serviceCategories":527,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":544,"homeStats":545,"serviceProducts":557},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,125,130,134,139,143,147,151,155,159,163,167,171,176],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},371,"P某涉嫌乐山最大诈骗案，团队律师成功为其取保候审","一、案情简介 P某本是一名做皮毛生意的商人。自2001年开始做兔皮生意以来，因头脑灵活，交友广泛，生意做得风生水起，甚至在甘肃、广州、深圳也办了毛皮经营部，成为当地有名的生意人。 正所谓“月有阴晴圆缺，人有旦夕祸福”，原本一帆风顺的生活因为","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":123,"summary":124,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},370,"W某某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，获变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F71ddf2cb-172c-468f-9712-79d533cba1ff.png","一、案情简介 2022年1月，W某某因涉嫌开设赌场罪被成都市公安局某分局刑事拘留。W某某家属在接收到拘留通知书后，经过多方打听和推荐，委托四川卓安律师事务所执行主任艾述洪律师团队为其提供刑事辩护，依法维护其合法权益。 二、办案过程 艾述洪律",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":128,"summary":129,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},369,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F62fcc043-3819-4a08-af4f-25529a22cade.png","一、案情简介 案件背景：本案疑因某市系列官员长期操控和干预项目工程招标涉嫌职务犯罪而引发，新任主要领导集体为整顿当地招标市场，打击串标、围标等违法犯罪活动由该市市委、纪委牵头指定该市某县公安局针对自2016年以来该市各项目招投标过程中涉嫌串",{"id":131,"title":132,"thumbnail":10,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},368,"W某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其积极辩护获取保候审","一、案情简介 嫌疑人王某涉嫌通过网络，虚构刷单兼职工作，以非法占有为目的，伙同同犯进行诈骗近一万元，被成都警方刑事拘留。9.3日被抓获，9.4日被拘留，9.5日羁押在成都市新都看守所，9.27日被批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 王某母亲选择只在侦",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":137,"summary":138,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},367,"H某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，团队律师经过不懈努力，取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F1fb0e1c9-65da-4b5b-9dfc-3f27d66453cd.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成都",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":10,"summary":142,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},366,"F某涉嫌集资诈骗罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，一审判处十年有期徒刑，二审成功改判五年","一、案情简介 2015年初至2017年3月，被告人F某在四川省农业银行某某直属支行工作期间，以帮本行贷款客户搞“过桥转贷”、做生意需用资金为由，以支付高额利息的方式向H某、T某等人非法吸收资金1亿1千余万元，至今尚有1200余万元未归还。其",{"id":144,"title":145,"thumbnail":10,"summary":146,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},365,"D某涉嫌贪污一审获刑6年，团队律师二审为其 辩护改判2年6个月","一、案情简介 2000年—2014年春节前，杜某利用国家工作人员职务之便，非法收受他人所送财物共计25.05万元，为他人谋取利益。杨某因涉嫌职务侵占罪，被羁押于成都市看守所。 二、办案过程 律师接到当事人亲属委托后，多次会见当事人杨某，对案",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":10,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},364,"Q某变压器厂副厂长一审被判受贿，团队律师为其辩护二审获减刑","一、案情简介 2002年下半年至2003年2月，L某、Z某、Q某、X某在国有企业四川某变压器厂改制过程中，利用其担任厂长和副厂长的职务之便，采取低评国有资产价值的手段，为收购该厂的杨某谋取利益。 事后，四人分别从Y某处收到四川某电器有限公司",{"id":152,"title":153,"thumbnail":10,"summary":154,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},363,"某有限公司法定代表人X某虚报注册资本、合同诈骗 千万案，团队律师为其成功辩护，二审改判两年","一、案情简介 1993年，四川省A发展有限公司在四川省工商局登记注册为有限责任公司（以下称甲公司），法定代表人为X某，1996年6月，四川B有线电视网络建设有限公司（以下称乙公司）在四川省工商局登记注 册，法定代表人为X某，注册资金为120",{"id":156,"title":157,"thumbnail":10,"summary":158,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},362,"X某涉嫌虚报注册资本罪、合同诈骗罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，一审法院处有期十一年，二审法院改判为两年","一、案情简介 1993年，四川省A发展有限公司在四川省工商局登记注册为有限责任公司（以下称甲公司），法定代表人为薛某，1996年6月，四川B有线电视网络建设有限公司（以下称乙公司）在四川省工商局登记注册，法定代表人为薛某，注册资金为1200",{"id":160,"title":161,"thumbnail":10,"summary":162,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},361,"W某误信朋友帮助其借款做工程，涉嫌非法集资高达1.8亿元，一审判处W某集资诈骗罪无期徒刑，二审团队律师对定性和量刑提出辩护意见，最终改判有期徒刑15年","一、案情简介 朋友称做项目需要资金，W某为友高息借款累计高达1.8亿元最终部分不能偿还，被债主追债无奈报案谎称被骗归案。资阳地区今年来最大的非法集资案件。 W某原本过着衣食无忧生活悠闲稳定的生活，偶然机会认识一朋友几经交往便关系密切彼此信任",{"id":164,"title":165,"thumbnail":10,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},360,"Z某涉嫌受贿、挪用公款案，团队律师为其辩护，二审改判挪用公款400万不成立","一、案情简介 章某，任某市某中心副主任兼该市某投资公司副总经理。2006年2月5日因涉嫌受贿罪和挪用公款罪被成都市公安局刑事拘留,同年2月8日被批准逮捕。 （1）1999年9月，章某在任该市某计划处科员期间，某医药软件开发公司、某电子有限公",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":10,"summary":170,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},359,"Y某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获从轻量刑","一、案情简介 被告人Y某为招标代理机构的工作人员，检察院诉称其在工作期间通过制作有利于星X公司和绿X公司的招标文件，帮助两公司在招标程序中成功中标，并在事后收到12万元的好处费。南宁市兴宁区人民检察院以被告人Y某串通投标，损害国家及他人的合",{"id":172,"title":173,"thumbnail":174,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},358,"H某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，所团队律师为其辩护获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F9f9a47b1-04bf-4e2d-a328-47da8fd62517.png","一、案情简介 2023年某月，H某在高额利益的诱惑下，通过架设16接口的固话座机和某网关设备，将设备开机使用后，每条固话线路每天可以获得3千元的报酬。上线所属的电信诈骗团伙利用H某架设的VOIP设备，达到隐匿真实位置的情况下，通过异地网络远",{"id":177,"title":178,"thumbnail":179,"summary":180,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},357,"W某涉嫌挪用公款罪、贪污罪、非法经营同类营业罪，团队律师为其辩护，其中非法经营同类营业罪获不起诉，刑期由七年六个月变更为三年六个月","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F03195445-4845-4d65-94a3-04beef8aaf72.png","一、案情简介 W某原为阿坝州M县某购销公司负责人。在其任职期间，利用职务之便虚增报销、虚高价格等方式倾吞公款、挪用公款进行盈利行为，同时利用粮油公司总经理的身份与他人合伙经营超市。因此，当地监委认定W某涉嫌贪污罪、挪用公款罪、非法经营同类营",[182,187,192,197,200,205,210,216,222],{"id":6,"code":183,"name":184,"summary":185,"keywords":186},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":188,"name":189,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":193,"name":194,"summary":195,"keywords":196},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":206,"name":207,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":211,"code":212,"name":213,"summary":214,"keywords":215},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":217,"code":218,"name":219,"summary":220,"keywords":221},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":223,"code":224,"name":225,"summary":226,"keywords":227},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":230,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":239,"lawyer":243},646,"2026-09-24 09:28:52",88,"东莞市看守所","走私国家禁止进出口的货物、物品罪","2026 年 9 月 8 日 郭伶玲 走私国家禁止进出口的货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F24\u002F2c49fe6e-4cd5-480b-9654-519c20f4d8ea.png","2026-09-24 09:27:44","郭伶玲",[240],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F8c3d86a4-31f4-44c3-acba-1131522a6d04.jpg",{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[245,248,261,274,287],{"id":230,"createdAt":231,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":232,"city":233,"caseType":234,"title":235,"thumbnail":236,"content":10,"publishTime":237,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":238,"lawyers":246},[247],{"id":232,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":238,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":242,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":249,"createdAt":250,"updatedAt":250,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":251,"city":252,"caseType":253,"title":254,"thumbnail":255,"content":10,"publishTime":256,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":257,"lawyers":258},645,"2026-09-24 09:27:43",75,"呈贡区看守所","掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪","2026 年 9 月 8 日 石晨炜 掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F24\u002F78baf64a-84de-4342-a971-5347febf3630.png","2026-09-24 09:26:50","石晨炜",[259],{"id":251,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":257,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":260,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fb0a368ce-5024-448d-9b3c-c3c66f14a084.jpg",{"id":262,"createdAt":263,"updatedAt":263,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":264,"city":265,"caseType":266,"title":267,"thumbnail":268,"content":10,"publishTime":269,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":270,"lawyers":271},644,"2026-09-24 09:26:49",56,"中江县人民法院","诈骗罪、介绍卖淫罪","2026 年 9 月 8 日 王子叶 诈骗罪、介绍卖淫罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F24\u002F4b20037d-8fe7-4ff8-a7d2-44049397c94f.png","2026-09-24 09:20:19","王子叶",[272],{"id":264,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":270,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":273,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",{"id":275,"createdAt":276,"updatedAt":276,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":277,"city":278,"caseType":279,"title":280,"thumbnail":281,"content":10,"publishTime":282,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":283,"lawyers":284},643,"2026-09-24 09:20:17",73,"盘龙区人民法院","组织、领导传销活动罪","2026 年 9 月 7 日 吴健南 组织、领导传销活动罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F24\u002Fcc506617-6a76-4c84-97e5-243f3f15ffbe.png","2026-09-24 09:19:37","吴健南",[285],{"id":277,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":283,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F2f8c528d-20dd-45a3-90d2-18566ef90632.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":289,"updatedAt":289,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":290,"city":291,"caseType":292,"title":293,"thumbnail":294,"content":10,"publishTime":295,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":296,"lawyers":297},642,"2026-09-24 09:19:35",10,"深圳市第二看守所","走私毒品罪","2026 年 9 月 7 日 陈志伟 走私毒品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F24\u002F00b38004-01ab-4681-89b7-39901d8d9f5b.png","2026-09-24 09:18:51","陈志伟",[298],{"id":290,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":296,"position":241,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":299,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd8b580fc-0c38-493a-aa21-2e3b581a7b9e.png",57,[302,311,318,325,332,339,346,352,358,367,374,381,388,395,402,411,418,425,432,438,444,450,456,462,468,474,480,489,496,503,509,515,521],{"id":303,"createdAt":304,"updatedAt":305,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":306,"name":307,"summary":308,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":309,"categoryName":310},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":312,"createdAt":313,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":317,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":309,"categoryName":310},19,"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":319,"createdAt":320,"updatedAt":321,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":322,"name":323,"summary":324,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":309,"categoryName":310},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":326,"createdAt":327,"updatedAt":328,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":329,"name":330,"summary":331,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":309,"categoryName":310},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":333,"createdAt":334,"updatedAt":335,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":336,"name":337,"summary":338,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":309,"categoryName":310},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":340,"createdAt":341,"updatedAt":342,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":343,"name":344,"summary":345,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":309,"categoryName":310},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":347,"updatedAt":348,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":349,"name":350,"summary":351,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":309,"categoryName":310},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":353,"createdAt":354,"updatedAt":354,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":355,"name":356,"summary":357,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":309,"categoryName":310},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":359,"createdAt":360,"updatedAt":361,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":362,"name":363,"summary":364,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":365,"categoryName":366},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":365,"categoryName":366},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":375,"createdAt":376,"updatedAt":377,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":378,"name":379,"summary":380,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":365,"categoryName":366},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":382,"createdAt":383,"updatedAt":384,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":385,"name":386,"summary":387,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":365,"categoryName":366},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":389,"createdAt":390,"updatedAt":391,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":392,"name":393,"summary":394,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":365,"categoryName":366},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":396,"createdAt":397,"updatedAt":398,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":399,"name":400,"summary":401,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":365,"categoryName":366},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":403,"createdAt":404,"updatedAt":405,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":406,"name":407,"summary":408,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":419,"createdAt":420,"updatedAt":421,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":422,"name":423,"summary":424,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":426,"createdAt":427,"updatedAt":428,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":429,"name":430,"summary":431,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":433,"createdAt":434,"updatedAt":434,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":435,"name":436,"summary":437,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":439,"createdAt":440,"updatedAt":440,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":441,"name":442,"summary":443,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":445,"createdAt":446,"updatedAt":446,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":447,"name":448,"summary":449,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},43,"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":451,"createdAt":452,"updatedAt":452,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":453,"name":454,"summary":455,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":457,"createdAt":458,"updatedAt":458,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":459,"name":460,"summary":461,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":463,"createdAt":464,"updatedAt":464,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":465,"name":466,"summary":467,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":469,"createdAt":470,"updatedAt":470,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":471,"name":472,"summary":473,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":475,"createdAt":476,"updatedAt":476,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":477,"name":478,"summary":479,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":409,"categoryName":410},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":481,"createdAt":482,"updatedAt":483,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":484,"name":485,"summary":486,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":487,"categoryName":488},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":490,"createdAt":491,"updatedAt":492,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":493,"name":494,"summary":495,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":487,"categoryName":488},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":497,"createdAt":498,"updatedAt":499,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":500,"name":501,"summary":502,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":487,"categoryName":488},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":504,"createdAt":505,"updatedAt":505,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":506,"name":507,"summary":508,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":487,"categoryName":488},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":510,"createdAt":511,"updatedAt":511,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":512,"name":513,"summary":514,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":487,"categoryName":488},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":516,"createdAt":517,"updatedAt":517,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":518,"name":519,"summary":520,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":487,"categoryName":488},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":522,"createdAt":523,"updatedAt":523,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":524,"name":525,"summary":526,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":487,"categoryName":488},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[528,532,536,540],{"id":40,"createdAt":529,"updatedAt":530,"deleted":31,"code":487,"name":488,"summary":531,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":533,"deleted":31,"code":309,"name":310,"summary":534,"displayTags":10,"icon":535,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":537,"deleted":31,"code":365,"name":366,"summary":538,"displayTags":10,"icon":539,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":409,"name":410,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[546,549,552,555],{"value":547,"label":548},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":550,"label":551},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":553,"label":554},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":322,"label":556},"全国分所",[558,561,564],{"title":559,"desc":560},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":562,"desc":563},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":565,"desc":566},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":568,"description":13,"keywords":569,"canonical":570,"image":10,"jsonLd":571},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[572],{"@context":573,"@graph":574},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[575,581],{"@type":576,"@id":577,"url":570,"name":7,"inLanguage":578,"publisher":579},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":580},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":582,"@id":580,"name":7,"url":570,"logo":583,"image":583,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":578,"address":584,"geo":587,"department":589},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":585,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":586},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":588,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[590,595,599,603,607,611],{"@type":591,"@id":592,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":593,"parentOrganization":594},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":585,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":580},{"@type":591,"@id":596,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":597,"parentOrganization":598},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":585,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":580},{"@type":591,"@id":600,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":585,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":580},{"@type":591,"@id":604,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":585,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":580},{"@type":591,"@id":608,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":585,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":580},{"@type":591,"@id":612,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":585,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":580},{"entity":616,"seo":627},{"id":617,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":618,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":40,"title":619,"thumbnail":620,"content":621,"publishTime":622,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":623},606,"2026-09-22 04:26:53","民警涉恶案心证逆转：公职人员卷入黑恶的认知与辩护 | 公职人员刑事危机应对","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fddd248d3-4c5b-4140-83de-aec062319fef.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公职人员涉黑恶指控的核心抗辩抓手，在于严格切断行政履职与黑恶犯罪通谋的因果链条。缺乏为组织谋取非法利益的主观故意与经济依附，单纯的治安处置失当或违规借贷，依法不能拔高定性为涉恶犯罪。通过调取处警记录与资金流水证明职务独立性，打掉黑恶属性、回归普通职务违法评价，是争取大幅轻判的法定关键路径。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、大案复盘：十年重刑边缘的民警涉恶案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公职人员在涉黑恶案件中一旦被拔高定性，其法律评价往往呈现断崖式恶化。在卓安律师事务所亲办的一起典型大案中，基层民警Z某因处置辖区内数起砂石堆场阻工矛盾，被公诉机关指控涉嫌滥用职权罪、寻衅滋事罪与受贿罪三项罪名。检方在《起诉书》中认定Z某系某涉案工程团伙的“保护伞及恶势力骨干成员”，建议法院数罪并罚合并执行有期徒刑十年以上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">案发背景源于当地民营建材企业与周边村民的多起群体性冲突。当该建材企业实际控制人因涉嫌强迫交易、聚众斗殴被立案侦查后，专案组将Z某昔日的三次现场调解、对两名阻工村民作出的行政拘留决定，以及其与涉案企业主的一笔资金拆借，全部串联并认定为“利用警察身份为恶势力站台造势”。此时合议庭面临严峻的审理考核指标，在开庭前已对Z某形成较深的有罪预断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">成安博士带领卓安律师事务所团队介入一审阶段后，迅速确定了“以客观书证推翻主观推定、将行政履职从涉恶共谋中剥离”的辩护方向。辩护团队向法庭申请调取了当年的《110接处警工作登记表》、警情派发电子日志及公安局法制部门的《行政处罚审批表》。这些经调取出的原始凭证显示，Z某到场处置均系执行上级公安机关的统一警务调度，对阻工人员作出的处罚均履行了法定审核审批程序，现场行为系在维持公共秩序而非为特定企业助威。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">针对控方指控的关键证据——企业主单方指认给予Z某8万元“涉恶保护费”，团队穿透审查了近五年的银行资金流水，向合议庭出示了双方妻子签署的《借条》及按期付息记录，有力推翻了指控的贿赂性质。法院在《刑事判决书》中最终采纳了成安律师的核心辩护意见，依法排除恶势力犯罪认定，撤回寻衅滋事罪指控，仅就其违规介入经济纠纷的轻微过错认定轻罪，判处有期徒刑三年，彻底扭转了原本看似难以松动的重刑判决。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、心态解构：体制内公职人员的认知盲区与陷阱\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>从执法者到受审人：权力幻灭引发的心理失序\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公职人员在身陷刑事指控时的心理防线，往往比普通涉案人员更容易迅速瓦解。长期掌握执法权或管理权的从业经历，让他们习惯了自上而下的审视视角，在遭遇监察留置或异地公安审查时，会产生极度强烈的认知错位。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当昔日熟悉的同事、下属在讯问室中履行审查职责时，公职人员的第一反应通常是极度震惊与错愕。他们难以接受自身“为了解决实际问题”的履职举措被法律技术重新解构，在极短时间内从“体制秩序维护者”滑落至被审视的谷底，导致其在初次讯问中极易陷入情绪失控或过度抵抗的被动状态。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>对组织拯救的路径依赖与自毁式退让\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公职人员在体制内生活日久，容易将行政问责的处理惯性错误套用至严酷的刑事诉讼程序中。在面临调查组带有诱导性质的讯问时，部分涉案公职人员往往抱有“只要认错态度端正、替领导或大局兜底，组织自会出面保护”的严重幻想。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通俗来讲，这就是把刑事办案当成了单位年终写检讨。在监察机关留置期间，部分干部为了迎合调查方向、体现自身配合意识，轻易在记录有“明知该企业具有社会恶名仍予照顾”、“默许该团伙在辖区内树立威势”等定性色彩极强的笔录上签字。他们未曾想到，这些未经斟酌的言辞笔录一旦进入审查起诉卷宗，将直接转化为推定主观共谋的关键证据链，彻底关闭了行政自救的窗口。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>行政潜规则与刑事违法的界限混淆\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在基层行政实务中，“结果导向”与“以打促和”往往被默许为行之有效的工作手段。为了确保招商引资平稳落地、重点工程不因阻工停滞，一线干部常常游走于行政职权的模糊边界，借助地方实力人物的威慑力去压制矛盾。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">然而，刑事司法的评价尺度只认法定权限与法定程序，绝不承认行政内部的默许机制。当扫黑除恶专项审查切入时，那些曾经换来工作政绩的妥协，会在一瞬间被司法机关转化为滥用职权、寻衅滋事乃至黑恶势力的客观行为。误将无公文支持的默许视为免责凭证，是涉案公职人员最普遍、也最致命的认知盲区。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fa9bcd268-7c25-4b66-805a-2ec6a86a39d7.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、人性幽微：生存哲学与利益权衡下的替罪逻辑\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>基层权力生态下的微小妥协与灰色共生\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">深入复盘公职人员被指控涉黑涉恶的案件脉络，极少有人自始便具有与犯罪团伙结盟的犯意。更多时候，这是一种身处资源紧缺与考核重压下的渐进式失守。基层治理面临大量的信访隐患与治安维稳压力，公职人员为了完成硬性指标，往往需要依靠社会人员协助摸排社情、调处群际纠纷。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在这个过程中，各方维持着微妙的利益平衡。公职人员在人情往来中接受了某些便利或应酬，自认并未破坏根本底线；而民营涉案人员则利用这种接触大肆虚构自身具有政法背景，在民间形成心理强制。当扫黑除恶的法定筛网收紧时，公职人员才猛然发现，平日里自以为能够完全掌控的灰色关系，早已在客观上沦为对方借以扩大声势的背书工具。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>危机降临时的责任转嫁与利益背叛\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">一旦刑事立案程序启动，昔日依托灰色平衡建立的脆弱关系会在朝夕之间化为齑粉。涉黑恶企业主在面临重刑威胁和巨额财产追缴压力时，其第一本能往往是寻求立功线索以求保命保财。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在大量实务案例中，涉案企业主在接受讯问时，常常会主动将暴力强拆、拦截恐吓的责任全数推卸给在场的公职人员。他们向侦查机关供述称“所有行动均经过某局长或某警官的现场授意与撑腰”，甚至将正常的借贷往来反咬为受公职人员敲诈索贿。公职人员不仅无法指望昔日合作伙伴分担责任，反而沦为对方在认罪认罚协商中换取轻判的最重筹码。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、法庭交锋：穿透证据打掉“涉恶”定性的核心维度\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公职人员涉恶案件的质证核心，在于依照《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》及两高两部相关司法解释，严格区分公权力运行中的职务过错与有组织犯罪行为。成安律师在法庭质证中强调，必须从主观犯意、行为归属及财产关系三个维度全面展开审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查维度\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">控方指控逻辑（主观推定）\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">辩方质证重点（客观还原）\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心法定抗辩抓手\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">意志联络\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">认定其明知团伙涉黑恶仍提供现场保护与帮助\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">证明公职人员仅系履行派警职责或参与联合行政执法\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">调取《110接处警记录》《受案审批表》证明公职来源\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">组织从属\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">将与涉案人员的日常频繁交往推定为服从组织安排\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">证明公职人员具备独立身份，从未接受团伙纪律规约约束\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核验通讯记录与证人证言，推翻“受团伙组织调度”说\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">经济关联\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">将涉案人员借款、宴请直接定性为涉恶黑财分赃\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">调取银行流水及抵押借据，证明款项性质系民间拆借\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查资金流向，证明款项未用于支持违法犯罪活动\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">行为定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">将行政处罚认定为打击竞争对手、为团伙扫清障碍\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">证明处罚决定经公安法制部门审核，属于行政裁量偏差\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">提出行政行为合法性审查，切断与共同犯罪的因果关联\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第一步：查证是否真正具备共同故意，排除主观推论\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">成立恶势力共同犯罪的前提，在于各方具有共同实施特定违法犯罪活动的通谋。在司法实务中，控方往往以公职人员与主犯“多次同桌就餐、互通电话”为由，主观推断公职人员对涉黑恶行为心知肚明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">成安博士在法庭对抗中指出，违规交往引发的纪律问题，不能直接替代刑法意义上的共犯故意。辩护人需引导法庭审查卷内言词证据：公职人员是否参与过犯罪团伙的内部密谋？是否对暴力行为的时间、地点、手段进行过事前商议？在缺乏明确意志联络证据的前提下，仅凭模糊的认知倾向推定共同犯意，严重违背了罪刑法定原则。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第二步：厘清处警职责与违法犯罪边界，坚决反对将职务过错推定为暴力共犯\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在涉及拆迁或群体性纠纷的案卷中，公职人员现身现场常被控方解释为“为黑恶人员站台压制被害人”。对此，辩护的关键在于全面核查公务行为的合法来源。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">通过向法庭出示综合治理调度文书、会议决议及现场执法音视频，可以充分证实公职人员到达现场属于公务派遣，其初衷是制止群体性流血事件。即使在处置过程中存在偏袒一方、执法语言粗暴或行政处罚幅度不当的瑕疵，其本质亦属于行政过错或职务渎职，在法律上绝不能将代表国家强制力的公职行为，直接降格认定为黑恶势力的私力暴力手段。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>第三步：穿透查清每一笔往来账目，瓦解“经济供养”的指控链条\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">涉恶犯罪常伴随着经济往来指控，控方极易将涉案老板与公职人员之间的款项往来，包装成“公职人员享受黑财分红”或“以职务包庇换取组织供养”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">辩护团队必须对全案涉案资金进行财务穿透审查。重点核验资金的发生节点、还款付息凭证、银行流水备注及借贷背景。只要能够证明涉案款项属于正常的民间资金周转，且具有对价与抵押手续，就能坚决打破控方关于“黑金供养”的证据闭合，从而推翻恶势力犯罪在公职人员身上的经济依附指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、实务救济：公职人员面临追诉时的应对准则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>戒除行政侥幸心理，全面回归刑事诉讼规则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公职人员一旦被采取强制措施，必须立即抛弃一切体制内的特权意识与侥幸心理。刑事侦查与监察调查有着极具刚性的法定程序，任何寄希望于非正式协调的企图，往往都会错失黄金抗辩时机。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">当事人及家属应第一时间聘请专注于涉黑恶领域的专业律师介入。在审查批捕的黄金窗口期内，由律师向检察机关依法提交《不予批准逮捕法律意见书》，紧扣是否构成恶势力犯罪集团的法定标准进行抗辩，防止案件在侦查起诉阶段被无序拔高。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>严守言词陈述边界，拒绝主观推定的迎合式供述\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">公职人员在接受讯问或调查时，必须牢固树立“事实归事实、定性归定性”的陈述原则。刑事证据审查严禁使用推测性、假设性的言词作为定案依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">面对办案人员诸如“你当时是不是想帮他们称霸一方”等带有强烈定性倾向的提问，当事人必须坚决拒绝顺从回答，只客观叙述出勤时间、执法依据及现场客观动作。对于自己不清楚的民间纠纷、未曾参与的团伙活动，坚决实事求是作出不知情陈述，严禁为了表现所谓的“悔过深刻”而对未实施的犯罪行为揽责上身。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">在涉及黑恶势力的司法实践中，公职人员常处于法纪衔接与政策从严的双重漩涡中心。面对定性升格与重刑指控，唯有依靠严密的法理推演和客观证据链的逐一拆解，才能剥除附着在公职人员身上的涉黑涉恶不当评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">正如卓安律师事务所首席律师成安博士所倡导的，穿透式事实梳理与理性的程序监督，才是避免公职人员在复杂的履职生态中被不当入罪的根本路径。刑事辩护的价值，不仅在于帮助个案当事人依法阻断严苛重刑，更在于捍卫司法底线，确保公权力追诉始终在法治框架内平稳运行，让每一份裁判文书都经得起法律与历史的检验。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专案研判支持：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>学术与实务指导：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 成安博士（卓安律师事务所首席律师、法学博士、原省级公安厅特聘专家顾问）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>协同办案机制：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依托卓安“控、辩、审、学”四维实战研判体系（原法官、原检察官与法学学者集体论证）\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>核心业务标签：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 近30年刑事法律实务经验 | 百人级刑事专业律师团队 | 刑事风控与合规 | 刑事危机应对与化解 | 重大疑难刑事案件辩护\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003Cbr>地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 04:25:51",{"id":40,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":624,"name":625,"icon":626,"sort":40,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"regulation","行业分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F6090a22a-a741-4cbb-b6b7-164e2b87af4d.png",{"title":628,"description":629,"keywords":32,"canonical":630,"image":620,"jsonLd":631},"民警涉恶案心证逆转：公职人员卷入黑恶的认知与辩护 | 公职人员刑事危机应对 - 行业分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","公职人员涉黑恶指控的核心抗辩抓手，在于严格切断行政履职与黑恶犯罪通谋的因果链条。缺乏为组织谋取非法利益的主观故意与经济依附，单纯的治安处置失当或违规借贷，依法不能拔高定性为涉恶犯罪。通过调取处警记录与资金流水证明职务独立性，打掉黑恶属性、回归普通职务违法评价，是争取大幅轻判的法定关键路径。 一、大案复盘：十年重刑边缘的","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation\u002F606",[632],{"@context":573,"@graph":633},[634,641],{"@type":635,"@id":630,"url":630,"headline":619,"description":629,"datePublished":636,"dateModified":637,"author":638,"publisher":639,"articleSection":625,"inLanguage":578,"image":640},"NewsArticle","2026-09-22T04:25:51+08:00","2026-09-22T04:26:53+08:00",{"@id":580},{"@id":580},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fddd248d3-4c5b-4140-83de-aec062319fef.png",{"@type":642,"itemListElement":643},"BreadcrumbList",[644,647,649],{"@type":645,"position":6,"name":646,"item":570},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":645,"position":38,"name":625,"item":648},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fregulation",{"@type":645,"position":35,"name":619,"item":630}]