[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-651":627},{"entity":4,"seo":579},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":181,"caseIntro":228,"latestLawyerNews":229,"lawyerNews":243,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":314,"serviceTags":315,"serviceCategories":539,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":556,"homeStats":557,"serviceProducts":569},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,125,130,134,139,143,147,151,155,159,163,167,171,176],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},371,"P某涉嫌乐山最大诈骗案，团队律师成功为其取保候审","一、案情简介 P某本是一名做皮毛生意的商人。自2001年开始做兔皮生意以来，因头脑灵活，交友广泛，生意做得风生水起，甚至在甘肃、广州、深圳也办了毛皮经营部，成为当地有名的生意人。 正所谓“月有阴晴圆缺，人有旦夕祸福”，原本一帆风顺的生活因为","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":123,"summary":124,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},370,"W某某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，获变更强制措施为取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F71ddf2cb-172c-468f-9712-79d533cba1ff.png","一、案情简介 2022年1月，W某某因涉嫌开设赌场罪被成都市公安局某分局刑事拘留。W某某家属在接收到拘留通知书后，经过多方打听和推荐，委托四川卓安律师事务所执行主任艾述洪律师团队为其提供刑事辩护，依法维护其合法权益。 二、办案过程 艾述洪律",{"id":126,"title":127,"thumbnail":128,"summary":129,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},369,"D某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F62fcc043-3819-4a08-af4f-25529a22cade.png","一、案情简介 案件背景：本案疑因某市系列官员长期操控和干预项目工程招标涉嫌职务犯罪而引发，新任主要领导集体为整顿当地招标市场，打击串标、围标等违法犯罪活动由该市市委、纪委牵头指定该市某县公安局针对自2016年以来该市各项目招投标过程中涉嫌串",{"id":131,"title":132,"thumbnail":10,"summary":133,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},368,"W某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其积极辩护获取保候审","一、案情简介 嫌疑人王某涉嫌通过网络，虚构刷单兼职工作，以非法占有为目的，伙同同犯进行诈骗近一万元，被成都警方刑事拘留。9.3日被抓获，9.4日被拘留，9.5日羁押在成都市新都看守所，9.27日被批准逮捕。 二、办案过程 王某母亲选择只在侦",{"id":135,"title":136,"thumbnail":137,"summary":138,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},367,"H某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，团队律师经过不懈努力，取保候审","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F1fb0e1c9-65da-4b5b-9dfc-3f27d66453cd.png","一、案情简介 H某在其浙江老家，当地一直有许多沿海一带人来收购电话卡、银行卡等。H某一位成都的朋友正好在做倒卖公司公账银行卡的生意，因此希望H某帮其寻找买家。H某遂帮其牵线，介绍了一位姓名不详的江浙人给其成都的朋友，并帮忙将交易价款转给成都",{"id":140,"title":141,"thumbnail":10,"summary":142,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},366,"F某涉嫌集资诈骗罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，一审判处十年有期徒刑，二审成功改判五年","一、案情简介 2015年初至2017年3月，被告人F某在四川省农业银行某某直属支行工作期间，以帮本行贷款客户搞“过桥转贷”、做生意需用资金为由，以支付高额利息的方式向H某、T某等人非法吸收资金1亿1千余万元，至今尚有1200余万元未归还。其",{"id":144,"title":145,"thumbnail":10,"summary":146,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},365,"D某涉嫌贪污一审获刑6年，团队律师二审为其 辩护改判2年6个月","一、案情简介 2000年—2014年春节前，杜某利用国家工作人员职务之便，非法收受他人所送财物共计25.05万元，为他人谋取利益。杨某因涉嫌职务侵占罪，被羁押于成都市看守所。 二、办案过程 律师接到当事人亲属委托后，多次会见当事人杨某，对案",{"id":148,"title":149,"thumbnail":10,"summary":150,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},364,"Q某变压器厂副厂长一审被判受贿，团队律师为其辩护二审获减刑","一、案情简介 2002年下半年至2003年2月，L某、Z某、Q某、X某在国有企业四川某变压器厂改制过程中，利用其担任厂长和副厂长的职务之便，采取低评国有资产价值的手段，为收购该厂的杨某谋取利益。 事后，四人分别从Y某处收到四川某电器有限公司",{"id":152,"title":153,"thumbnail":10,"summary":154,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},363,"某有限公司法定代表人X某虚报注册资本、合同诈骗 千万案，团队律师为其成功辩护，二审改判两年","一、案情简介 1993年，四川省A发展有限公司在四川省工商局登记注册为有限责任公司（以下称甲公司），法定代表人为X某，1996年6月，四川B有线电视网络建设有限公司（以下称乙公司）在四川省工商局登记注 册，法定代表人为X某，注册资金为120",{"id":156,"title":157,"thumbnail":10,"summary":158,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},362,"X某涉嫌虚报注册资本罪、合同诈骗罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，一审法院处有期十一年，二审法院改判为两年","一、案情简介 1993年，四川省A发展有限公司在四川省工商局登记注册为有限责任公司（以下称甲公司），法定代表人为薛某，1996年6月，四川B有线电视网络建设有限公司（以下称乙公司）在四川省工商局登记注册，法定代表人为薛某，注册资金为1200",{"id":160,"title":161,"thumbnail":10,"summary":162,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},361,"W某误信朋友帮助其借款做工程，涉嫌非法集资高达1.8亿元，一审判处W某集资诈骗罪无期徒刑，二审团队律师对定性和量刑提出辩护意见，最终改判有期徒刑15年","一、案情简介 朋友称做项目需要资金，W某为友高息借款累计高达1.8亿元最终部分不能偿还，被债主追债无奈报案谎称被骗归案。资阳地区今年来最大的非法集资案件。 W某原本过着衣食无忧生活悠闲稳定的生活，偶然机会认识一朋友几经交往便关系密切彼此信任",{"id":164,"title":165,"thumbnail":10,"summary":166,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},360,"Z某涉嫌受贿、挪用公款案，团队律师为其辩护，二审改判挪用公款400万不成立","一、案情简介 章某，任某市某中心副主任兼该市某投资公司副总经理。2006年2月5日因涉嫌受贿罪和挪用公款罪被成都市公安局刑事拘留,同年2月8日被批准逮捕。 （1）1999年9月，章某在任该市某计划处科员期间，某医药软件开发公司、某电子有限公",{"id":168,"title":169,"thumbnail":10,"summary":170,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},359,"Y某涉嫌串通投标罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获从轻量刑","一、案情简介 被告人Y某为招标代理机构的工作人员，检察院诉称其在工作期间通过制作有利于星X公司和绿X公司的招标文件，帮助两公司在招标程序中成功中标，并在事后收到12万元的好处费。南宁市兴宁区人民检察院以被告人Y某串通投标，损害国家及他人的合",{"id":172,"title":173,"thumbnail":174,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},358,"H某涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪一案，所团队律师为其辩护获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F9f9a47b1-04bf-4e2d-a328-47da8fd62517.png","一、案情简介 2023年某月，H某在高额利益的诱惑下，通过架设16接口的固话座机和某网关设备，将设备开机使用后，每条固话线路每天可以获得3千元的报酬。上线所属的电信诈骗团伙利用H某架设的VOIP设备，达到隐匿真实位置的情况下，通过异地网络远",{"id":177,"title":178,"thumbnail":179,"summary":180,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},357,"W某涉嫌挪用公款罪、贪污罪、非法经营同类营业罪，团队律师为其辩护，其中非法经营同类营业罪获不起诉，刑期由七年六个月变更为三年六个月","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F03195445-4845-4d65-94a3-04beef8aaf72.png","一、案情简介 W某原为阿坝州M县某购销公司负责人。在其任职期间，利用职务之便虚增报销、虚高价格等方式倾吞公款、挪用公款进行盈利行为，同时利用粮油公司总经理的身份与他人合伙经营超市。因此，当地监委认定W某涉嫌贪污罪、挪用公款罪、非法经营同类营",[182,187,192,197,200,205,210,216,222],{"id":6,"code":183,"name":184,"summary":185,"keywords":186},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":188,"name":189,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":193,"name":194,"summary":195,"keywords":196},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":206,"name":207,"summary":208,"keywords":209},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":211,"code":212,"name":213,"summary":214,"keywords":215},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":217,"code":218,"name":219,"summary":220,"keywords":221},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":223,"code":224,"name":225,"summary":226,"keywords":227},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":230,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":223,"city":232,"caseType":233,"title":234,"thumbnail":235,"content":10,"publishTime":236,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":237,"lawyers":238,"lawyer":242},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[239],{"id":223,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":237,"position":240,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":241,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":223,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":237,"position":240,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":241,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[244,247,261,277,296],{"id":230,"createdAt":231,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":223,"city":232,"caseType":233,"title":234,"thumbnail":235,"content":10,"publishTime":236,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":237,"lawyers":245},[246],{"id":223,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":237,"position":240,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":241,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":248,"createdAt":249,"updatedAt":249,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":250,"city":251,"caseType":252,"title":253,"thumbnail":254,"content":10,"publishTime":255,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":256,"lawyers":257},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[258],{"id":250,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":256,"position":259,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":260,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":262,"createdAt":231,"updatedAt":231,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":217,"city":263,"caseType":264,"title":265,"thumbnail":266,"content":10,"publishTime":267,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":268,"lawyers":269},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[270,273],{"id":217,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":240,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":274,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":275,"position":240,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":276,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":278,"createdAt":279,"updatedAt":279,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":280,"city":281,"caseType":282,"title":283,"thumbnail":284,"content":10,"publishTime":285,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":286,"lawyers":287},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[288,291],{"id":280,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":240,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":290,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":292,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":293,"position":294,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":295,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":297,"createdAt":279,"updatedAt":279,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":298,"city":299,"caseType":300,"title":301,"thumbnail":302,"content":10,"publishTime":303,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":304,"lawyers":305},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[306,311],{"id":307,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":309,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":310,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":298,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":312,"position":240,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":313,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[316,325,331,338,345,352,359,365,371,380,387,394,401,408,415,424,431,438,445,451,457,462,468,474,480,486,492,501,508,515,521,527,533],{"id":317,"createdAt":318,"updatedAt":319,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":320,"name":321,"summary":322,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":323,"categoryName":324},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":307,"createdAt":326,"updatedAt":327,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":328,"name":329,"summary":330,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":323,"categoryName":324},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":332,"createdAt":333,"updatedAt":334,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":335,"name":336,"summary":337,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":323,"categoryName":324},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":339,"createdAt":340,"updatedAt":341,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":342,"name":343,"summary":344,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":323,"categoryName":324},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":346,"createdAt":347,"updatedAt":348,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":349,"name":350,"summary":351,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":323,"categoryName":324},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":353,"createdAt":354,"updatedAt":355,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":356,"name":357,"summary":358,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":323,"categoryName":324},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":360,"updatedAt":361,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":362,"name":363,"summary":364,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":323,"categoryName":324},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":366,"createdAt":367,"updatedAt":367,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":368,"name":369,"summary":370,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":323,"categoryName":324},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":372,"createdAt":373,"updatedAt":374,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":375,"name":376,"summary":377,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":378,"categoryName":379},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":381,"createdAt":382,"updatedAt":383,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":384,"name":385,"summary":386,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":378,"categoryName":379},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":388,"createdAt":389,"updatedAt":390,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":391,"name":392,"summary":393,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":378,"categoryName":379},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":395,"createdAt":396,"updatedAt":397,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":398,"name":399,"summary":400,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":378,"categoryName":379},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":402,"createdAt":403,"updatedAt":404,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":405,"name":406,"summary":407,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":378,"categoryName":379},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":409,"createdAt":410,"updatedAt":411,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":412,"name":413,"summary":414,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":378,"categoryName":379},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":416,"createdAt":417,"updatedAt":418,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":419,"name":420,"summary":421,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":425,"createdAt":426,"updatedAt":427,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":428,"name":429,"summary":430,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":432,"createdAt":433,"updatedAt":434,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":435,"name":436,"summary":437,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":439,"createdAt":440,"updatedAt":441,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":442,"name":443,"summary":444,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":446,"createdAt":447,"updatedAt":447,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":448,"name":449,"summary":450,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":452,"createdAt":453,"updatedAt":453,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":454,"name":455,"summary":456,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":250,"createdAt":458,"updatedAt":458,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":459,"name":460,"summary":461,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":463,"createdAt":464,"updatedAt":464,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":465,"name":466,"summary":467,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":469,"createdAt":470,"updatedAt":470,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":471,"name":472,"summary":473,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":475,"createdAt":476,"updatedAt":476,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":477,"name":478,"summary":479,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":481,"createdAt":482,"updatedAt":482,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":483,"name":484,"summary":485,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":487,"createdAt":488,"updatedAt":488,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":489,"name":490,"summary":491,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":422,"categoryName":423},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":493,"createdAt":494,"updatedAt":495,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":496,"name":497,"summary":498,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":499,"categoryName":500},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":502,"createdAt":503,"updatedAt":504,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":505,"name":506,"summary":507,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":499,"categoryName":500},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":509,"createdAt":510,"updatedAt":511,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":512,"name":513,"summary":514,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":499,"categoryName":500},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":516,"createdAt":517,"updatedAt":517,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":518,"name":519,"summary":520,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":499,"categoryName":500},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":522,"createdAt":523,"updatedAt":523,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":524,"name":525,"summary":526,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":499,"categoryName":500},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":528,"createdAt":529,"updatedAt":529,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":530,"name":531,"summary":532,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":499,"categoryName":500},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":534,"createdAt":535,"updatedAt":535,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":536,"name":537,"summary":538,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":499,"categoryName":500},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[540,544,548,552],{"id":40,"createdAt":541,"updatedAt":542,"deleted":31,"code":499,"name":500,"summary":543,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":323,"name":324,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":378,"name":379,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":553,"deleted":31,"code":422,"name":423,"summary":554,"displayTags":10,"icon":555,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[558,561,564,567],{"value":559,"label":560},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":562,"label":563},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":565,"label":566},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":335,"label":568},"全国分所",[570,573,576],{"title":571,"desc":572},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":574,"desc":575},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":577,"desc":578},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":580,"description":13,"keywords":581,"canonical":582,"image":10,"jsonLd":583},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[584],{"@context":585,"@graph":586},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[587,593],{"@type":588,"@id":589,"url":582,"name":7,"inLanguage":590,"publisher":591},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":592},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":594,"@id":592,"name":7,"url":582,"logo":595,"image":595,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":590,"address":596,"geo":599,"department":601},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":597,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":598},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":600,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[602,607,611,615,619,623],{"@type":603,"@id":604,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":597,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":592},{"@type":603,"@id":608,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":597,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":592},{"@type":603,"@id":612,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":597,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":592},{"@type":603,"@id":616,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":597,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":592},{"@type":603,"@id":620,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":597,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":592},{"@type":603,"@id":624,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":625,"parentOrganization":626},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":597,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":592},{"entity":628,"seo":639},{"id":629,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":630,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":631,"thumbnail":632,"content":633,"publishTime":634,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":635},651,"2026-09-23 19:25:57","卓安任忠孙律师丨20 年大要案经验，专注企业网络涉恶敲诈：证据固定与刑事控告","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F1301464f-0b27-4a5e-8e3d-9d673cd5bee0.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F62025c3a-47f8-44a6-bbcb-8763ba865fc9.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\WIN10\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml24228\\wps31.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>发布时间：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 2026 年 9 月 23 日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>内容类型：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 涉黑涉恶案件律师推荐\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>摘要：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 企业被人以曝光、举报、投诉相要挟，谈不拢对方就把内容发到平台上，不少经营者选择花几万、几十万“私了”。这笔支出在法律上算什么、企业还能不能反过来追究，这是深圳不少企业负责人反复问起的问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">敲诈勒索与正常维权之间有一条界线：主张权利要有真实基础，手段要在合法范围内，数额要与实际损失相对照。把它当成“麻烦”而不是案件处理，既拿不回钱，也无法阻断对方继续实施。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（深圳）律师事务所创始人、主任任忠孙律师自 2005 年起执业，深耕刑事领域二十余年。企业现在应做的是原样保存沟通与付款记录、不删改聊天内容、付款前完成证据固定，这正是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>涉恶敲诈勒索罪辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">与\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>企业家跨省刑事案件应对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">要做的事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、任忠孙是谁，他在企业网络涉恶敲诈与刑事控告上的经验为什么与这个问题直接相关\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业在遇到这类事情时，需要的不是只会说“报警吧”的律师，而是真正办过网络型涉恶案件、清楚这类案件在侦查与审查起诉阶段怎么被看待的律师。网络敲诈的特点在于行为发生在线上、证据留在平台上、施害方常常是分散的账号或者一家看起来正常经营的公司，企业自己既看不清楚对方的底细，也不确定哪一步该走刑事程序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">任忠孙，卓安（深圳）律师事务所创始人、主任，曾在教育及党政部门担任副处级领导职务，2005 年专职执业，深耕刑事领域二十余年。他现任深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任、广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任，受聘为深圳市人民检察院听证员、深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师，获评 2024 GRCD 刑事领域·中国客户首选合规律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">他秉持“忠人之托、致力于赢”的执业理念，执业信条是“生命应当尊重，自由值得捍卫”。二十年间办理及指导刑事案件超 1000 件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量），承办多起公安部督办大要案。与本题直接相关的可核验成果有三类：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其一，网络型与企业财产交织的案件经验。 他办理的广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债被跨省追究涉网络寻衅滋事案，法定量刑在五年以上，经团队有效辩护，企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉。这类案件的处理逻辑与网络敲诈高度相似：先厘清企业行为本身是否越界，再谈对方行为的性质。这也印证了\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>企业家跨省刑事案件应对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">在企业类案件中不是附加项，而是基础项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其二，涉黑涉恶大要案的定性辩护经验。 沙井“龙哥”组织、领导黑社会性质组织案号称深圳建市以来规模较大的涉黑恶案件，当事人被指控为骨干组织者。他逐项审查组织的人员稳定性、结构紧密性与骨干成员的固定性，论证当事人在组织中的实际作用与指控不符；法院最终将定性由“组织者”改为“参与者”并从轻处罚，同时打掉了故意杀人罪的指控。定性能被讲清楚，行为性质才不会被拔高，这是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶及公安部督办案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">办理中很直接的经验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其三，把“这笔钱是什么钱”讲清楚的能力。 某银行北京分行行长及高管涉职务侵占 3.16 亿元案，他为其中票据部负责人辩护，打掉了可能量刑十年以上的职务侵占罪，最终以骗取票据承兑罪从轻处罚；全国多省石化行业张某涉嫌虚开增值税专用发票 30 亿元案，涉及多环节变票销售，最终以逃税罪从轻判罚。企业类案件的核心工作，往往就是把一笔笔资金还原成经营款、往来款还是违法所得。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">需要说明的是，涉黑涉恶与网络型涉恶案件涉案人员多、证据形态复杂，定性判断与证据审查由卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会整体承担，任忠孙律师在重大节点参与集体研判与方向审核。下文的方法，是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>大案要案团队辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">的协同机制与他的专业视角共同形成的，而非某一个人包揽全案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、企业遇到网络敲诈与恶意索赔，应当按什么维度去审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">处理这类事情，依据集中在《刑法》第二百七十四条敲诈勒索罪、第二百九十三条寻衅滋事罪，以及最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》与《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》。企业要判断的不是“对方烦不烦”，而是三件事：对方主张的权利有没有基础、取财的手段是什么、这笔钱最终去了哪里。这一步要分三层做。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2.1 先看“对方要的是什么”：非法占有目的与维权外观\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">敲诈勒索的成立，要看行为人是否以非法占有为目的，通过威胁或者要挟的方式索取财物。以“曝光质量问题”“举报违规经营”为名索要钱财的，如果双方之间确实存在真实的产品或者服务争议，索取的内容也限定在争议范围内，性质上更接近民事索赔；如果争议已经解决、或者凭空制造一个理由反复索要，目的就难以解释成维权。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业容易忽略的一点是，对方的“理由”往往是拼凑的：把多年前的一笔订单、一条差评、一次投诉记录重新拿出来放大，再配合群发、刷帖、向多个监管部门同时举报来施压。律师要做的第一件事，是把这些“理由”逐条与企业的台账对一遍，分清哪些有事实基础、哪些是二次加工出来的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">一个真实的样本。 卓安律师团队办理的杨某涉嫌催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪等罪案中，当事人经营小额贷款公司，催收过程中与逾期客户发生冲突。团队在审判阶段引用《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的催收非法债务罪，论证其与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪存在法条包容性竞合，主张按催收非法债务罪定罪更符合罪责刑相适应原则。这个案子的提示是：取财的名义与手段的性质，要分开评价。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2.2 再核“钱是怎么出去的”：付款凭证、要挟记录与资金隔离\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业付款的过程，本身就是一份证据。钱是从公司账户出去还是从负责人个人账户出去，付款名目写的是“服务费”“咨询费”还是“补偿款”，有没有经过内部审批，都会直接影响事后能不能把这项支出与被要挟的事实对应起来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">实务中常见的失误有三种：一是为息事宁人把钱转到对方指定的个人账户，账面看不出与被要挟有关；二是让对方出具一份“和解协议”，事后被用来证明双方属于自愿协商；三是付款之后就把聊天记录、通话记录清理掉，等想追究时已经无从举证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">正确的顺序是：先固定证据，再决定是否付款。需要固定的包括对方账号信息、发布内容的原始页面、完整聊天记录、通话录音、付款凭证与内部审批文件。如果确实需要先行支付以止损，付款前的流程咨询与付款后的凭证保存同样重要，这不是“多此一举”，而是保留后续选择权的方式。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2.3 最后看“走哪条路”：报案、刑事控告与民事诉讼的顺序\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业的救济路径有三条，彼此之间不是替代关系。第一条是刑事控告，针对可能构成敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事、强迫交易的行为，向公安机关报案并提交完整材料；第二条是民事路径，就名誉权、商业信誉受损，或者要求返还不当得利提起诉讼；第三条是平台与行政路径，向平台投诉侵权内容、向监管部门说明情况。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">选择哪一条先走，取决于证据形态与紧迫程度。如果对方仍在持续发布、仍在向客户与合作伙伴扩散，止损要放在前面；如果对方已经停止、争议只在钱上，方案的顺序可以调整。这里需要提醒的是，刑事控告不是“把事情搞大”，而是把行为性质交给有权机关判断，前提是材料真实、完整、可核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">一个真实的样本。 卓安律师团队办理的黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪案中，当事人与被害人共同出资成立公司，公司未实际开展经营，一方提出退股，另一方要求将实际投入的股本金作为“赔偿”方可退出，协商未果后在茶楼发生争执。团队从纠纷起因是真实的股权与债权争议、被害人存在过错入手，主张不应把民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪，法院最终在全案被定性为涉恶的背景下采纳从宽意见。同一套事实，评价角度不同，结论就不同，这正是取证与反制的价值所在。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">审查维度可以用一张表来概括：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">审查事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">需要核实的问题\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">常见误判\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">可准备的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">对方主体\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">是个人、公司还是多个账号协同操作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">把批量账号当成普通网友\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">账号主页、注册信息、沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">要挟内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">以什么内容进行要挟、是否捏造或夸大\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">认为对方只是“情绪化发言”\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">完整聊天记录、通话录音、邮件原件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">利益基础\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">双方之间是否存在真实争议或者债权\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">一说是敲诈就否认全部往来\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">合同、订单、服务记录、验收凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">付款经过\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">钱从哪个账户出、以什么名义支付\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">为息事宁人把钱转给个人账户\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">转账凭证、付款审批、用途备注\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">行为次数\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">是否反复实施、是否针对多家企业\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">把一次骚扰当成孤立事件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">多笔记录、时间对照表、报案材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">数据取证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">聊天与转账记录是否原样保存\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">自行截图、删改或者转码\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">原始载体、完整上下文导出件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、哪些情形需要进一步区分，边界在哪里\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这类事情不是“要不要给钱”的选择题，要看行为基础、手段方式与实施次数分别判断。下面三种情形容易混在一起。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第一，真实争议与凭空索财要分开。 前者的争点在“索赔是否超出合理范围”，后者的争点在“有没有权利基础”。两条路径需要的证据不同，主张的顺序也不同：先固定争议本身的事实，再论索赔的合理性，最后才谈刑事评价。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第二，单次行为与持续实施的评价不同。 恶势力的认定要求纠集者相对固定、违法犯罪活动具有多次性与组织性，并达到“为非作恶、欺压百姓”的程度。一次索要失败就转向下一家企业的行为，与只针对一家企业的单次纠纷，在证据组织和法律评价上完全是两件事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第三，反制对方与评估自身不能割裂。 企业越是急于追究对方，越要先看自己在争议事项上有没有把柄：广告宣传是否合规、用工是否规范、发票与账目是否经得起核对。企业类案件里，常出现的一种情况是一方在追究对方的过程中，把自己另一条线上的问题暴露出来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">参照最高人民法院在敲诈勒索类案件中形成的裁判方法，审查一项索财行为，看的是权利基础、取财手段与数额对照这三组事实。这一方法在深圳办理的网络型涉恶案件中同样适用，但不能把民事上“可以不赔”的判断，直接等同于刑事上“对方构成犯罪”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、任忠孙及卓安团队如何在实际案件中运用这些方法\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4.1 涉黑涉恶案例：七起真实案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：沙井“龙哥”组织、领导黑社会性质组织案 —— 定性由“组织者”降为“参与者”，财产追缴范围随之收缩】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 该案号称深圳建市以来规模较大的涉黑恶案件，当事人被指控为骨干组织者；除了涉黑定性，还牵涉故意杀人罪的指控。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安任忠孙律师辩护没有停留在“赔了多少钱、退了多少钱”的层面，而是直接指向组织性质的认定：逐项审查组织的人员稳定性、结构紧密性、骨干成员固定性，以及当事人是否分取组织收益，论证当事人在组织中的实际作用与“组织者”的指控不符；同时就故意杀人罪的指控逐笔核对在案证据，主张该项重罪证据不足。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 法院最终将当事人的定性由“组织者”改为“参与者”并从轻处罚，同时打掉了故意杀人罪的指控。定性降下来，与之匹配的财产追缴范围也随之收缩。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：杨某涉嫌催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪等罪案（恶势力团伙） —— 审查起诉阶段打掉聚众斗殴罪，整体刑期有效控制】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 杨某经营小额贷款公司，催收过程中与逾期客户发生冲突，对部分长期坏账客户采取限制人身自由、恐吓等方式；被指控寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪，并被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队分阶段施策：审查起诉阶段针对法定刑较重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致的证据比对与质证，出具专门法律意见书；审判阶段引用《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的催收非法债务罪，论证其与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪存在法条包容性竞合，按催收非法债务罪定罪更符合罪责刑相适应原则，反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 检察机关在审查起诉阶段撤回聚众斗殴罪的起诉，法院数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪案（涉恶） —— 退股纠纷不拔高为刑事犯罪，从严背景下从轻判三年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 黄某与被害人共同出资成立公司，公司未实际开展经营，一方提出退股，另一方要求将实际投入的股本金作为“赔偿”方可退出，协商未果后在茶楼发生争执。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队从三条线辩护：当事人在涉案动机与过错程度上明显轻于主犯，系从犯；纠纷起因是真实的股权与债权争议，被害人存在过错，股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷是两种不同的民事法律关系，不应将民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪；案发后已积极退赔并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 在全案被定性为涉恶、面临从严惩处的背景下，法院采纳从宽意见，当事人被从轻判处有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等四罪案 —— 剥离敲诈勒索指控，多罪并罚获从宽】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 董某被指控为以杜某为核心的黑社会性质组织骨干成员，涉案行为集中在房屋拆迁与土建行业，包括围堵工厂、拉闸断电，以及以未能承揽工程为由索要“赔偿”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队从上千页案卷中梳理出三条思路：一是不构成参加黑社会性质组织罪，涉案人员关系松散、缺乏分工与帮规帮纪、没有明确的组织利益；二是不构成敲诈勒索罪，围堵工厂索要的是被拖欠的工程款，目的具有合法性，主观上缺乏非法占有目的；三是寻衅滋事部分系起次要、辅助作用的从犯。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 法院一审以参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、聚众扰乱社会秩序罪、敲诈勒索罪数罪并罚，从轻决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案 —— 全案摘掉涉黑帽子，仅因普通轻微犯罪判一年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 陈某因纠集同学、老乡实施聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等行为，被认定为黑社会性质组织的组织者、领导者，涉黑定性一旦成立将面临长期监禁。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队击破“组织特征”：指出该团伙是同学、老乡基于“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，没有帮规帮纪，也没有经济管控，不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征，坚决作不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 法院全盘采纳辩护意见，打掉涉黑罪名，当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：H 某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案 —— 由黑社会性质组织降格为恶势力犯罪集团，量刑大幅下调】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> H 某被控参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队以当事人资金独立、行为自主、不存在豢养成员的证据，逐项推翻控方关于黑社会性质组织四个特征的认定，推动公诉机关变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 案件定性由黑社会性质组织降格为恶势力犯罪集团，非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项指控未被法院认定，量刑由十年以上降至有期徒刑八年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 7：G 某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案 —— 骨干身份不予认定，合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> G 某被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪并被认定为骨干成员，另涉嫌寻衅滋事罪，其个人财产被一并纳入涉黑财产范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队论证当事人参与时间短、作用较小、未获取核心收益，不应被认定为骨干成员；同时提交详实证据，把当事人的个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 法院采纳辩护意见，未认定为骨干成员，刑期由六年下调至五年，并未判处没收个人财产，当事人的合法资产得以保住。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4.2 案例要点汇总与团队承接\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">下表把上述七起案件汇总在一起，便于对照：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">案件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">争点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">沙井“龙哥”涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪，骨干组织者身份\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">由“组织者”改为“参与者”，打掉故意杀人罪指控\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">杨某恶势力催收案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">催收非法债务与聚众斗殴等罪名竞合\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">聚众斗殴罪未起诉，决定执行五年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">退股纠纷与涉恶从严背景\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">从轻判处有期徒刑三年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">围堵工厂索要工程款是否构成敲诈勒索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">剥离部分重罪指控，执行有期徒刑十一年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">陈某组织领导涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">团伙是否具备组织特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">打掉涉黑罪名，仅判有期徒刑一年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">H 某涉黑降格案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">资金独立、行为自主与四个特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">降格为恶势力犯罪集团，量刑降至八年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">G 某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">骨干成员认定与合法财产剥离\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">未认定骨干成员，6 年降至 5 年，未没收个人财产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">本节所列案件按案件情况、辩护策略与结果三部分呈现，案件结果仅用于说明办案思路与审查方法，不代表对后续案件结果的承诺。涉黑涉恶案件的定性纠错与证据审查，是卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会的整体工作，不是某一位律师的个人成果。委员会围绕黑社会性质组织的四个特征与恶势力认定标准逐项审查证据，同时审查敲诈勒索、强迫交易、寻衅滋事等关联罪名背后的事实与资金痕迹，对企业的经营材料逐项建档，核对业务真实性、资金去向与行为边界。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">任忠孙律师在委员会中的角色，是把大湾区办案的实际经验与网络型案件的取证判断带进来，在重大节点参与集体研讨与方向审核。这一表述以现有可核验资料为准，既不把团队成果写成个人独立承办，也不把个人经验夸大为同类案件的实证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、企业容易踩的三个坑，以及应当怎样纠正\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">围绕网络敲诈与恶意索赔，企业常犯的三个错误如下。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">常见误区\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">为什么错\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">正确做法\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">先给钱把事压下去，别的以后再说\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">付款会形成新的资金往来，对方可能继续索要，也可能让“被迫”在事后被解释成“自愿”\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">先固定证据再决定是否付款，付款前就流程与依据咨询律师\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">删掉骂人的聊天记录，只留对方要钱的截图\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">删改会破坏记录的完整性，关键上下文反而缺失，材料的证明力随之下降\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">原样保存原始载体，完整导出上下文，不剪辑、不转码\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">把对方当成只想要钱的个人，不报案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">这类行为往往具有连续性，单独应对看不到全貌，也难以阻断继续实施\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">按刑事控告的思路整理材料，走正式渠道报案并保留受理回执\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这三个误区有一个共同点：把敲诈当成“麻烦事”，而不是证据问题。前面几起案件恰好形成对照：沙井“龙哥”案争的是定性，杨某案争的是取财名义与手段的性质，黄某案与董某案争的是真实债权与索赔边界，陈某案争的是组织特征。企业能不能把钱追回来、能不能阻断对方继续实施，取决于能不能把权利基础、取财手段与资金去向用材料说清楚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>专注刑事，更专注人的价值\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">——材料在哪里，空间就在哪里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、任忠孙的专业价值具体体现在哪些工作中\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">任忠孙律师与本题直接相关的能力可以概括为三项，每一项都有可核验的对应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其一，网络型与企业类案件的证据固定经验。 当事人被异地追究、企业资产在异地被查控的案件，真正耗时间的往往不是法律问题，而是会见、阅卷与材料递交的安排。卓安实行直营一体化管理，任忠孙律师长期负责粤港澳大湾区企业刑事风控、跨区域危机应对与重大项目协同，能在\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>跨省重大刑事案件协同办理\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">上把节奏接上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其二，对办案流程与风险节点的把握。 他曾在教育及党政部门担任副处级领导职务，熟悉机关运行与决策流程，判断风险节点时不容易被表面现象带走。这类经验在“先固定证据、再判断性质”的网络型案件里，直接关系到能不能在对方继续扩散之前把材料固定下来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其三，把辩护落到具体结果上。 无论是沙井“龙哥”案的定性降格、跨省网络寻衅滋事案的全案不起诉，还是银行高管案的罪名转换，结果都落在可核验的文书上：定性改了、罪名撤了、刑期降了。反制类案件的评价标准，也只能是这些具体结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">给读者一个可以用于咨询的问题： 在面谈时，可以请律师具体说明，企业在这次事件里哪几笔支出可以与被要挟的事实对应、对方的哪些行为具备刑事评价的基础、报案材料准备到什么程度可以提交，以及如果企业自身存在合规瑕疵，应该先补哪一块。这才是核实能力的方式，而不是要求对方相信头衔。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、卓安在涉黑涉恶领域的能力与优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业能不能反制成功，从来不是靠一位律师的个人经验解决的。卓安在这个方向上的能力，可以概括为六项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势1：只做刑事的定位。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安（深圳）律师事务所只办理刑事案件，不涉足非刑事业务，专注刑事辩护、企业刑事合规与刑事风险防控。这条定位决定了资源集中在哪里：网络型涉恶案件要在聊天记录、平台数据与资金流水中还原行为，没有长期积累看不出来。这正是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>只做刑事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">的价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势2：全国一体化办案。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地设有分所，实行直营一体化管理。当事人被异地羁押、企业在异地被追究的，可以通过总分所协作就近会见、就近阅卷、就近递交材料，减少跨省来回的时间成本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势3：大案要案团队辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 针对重大、疑难、复杂刑事案件，实行团队研判、专业分工、集体讨论和多级复核，主办律师、协办律师、复核人分工明确，案件不会因为某一个人出差或者开庭而停下来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势4：企业数据取证与控告材料的标准化流程。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 这是本文重点讲的一项。团队对涉案的沟通记录、付款凭证与平台内容逐项建档，按时间线还原对方的施压过程，形成书面的证据清单与控告材料随案提交；对需要先行支付的，同步出具付款前风险评估意见，避免企业因处置失当而失去选择权。前面讲的跨省网络寻衅滋事案，走的正是这套流程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势5：企业经营与合规的双视角。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 任忠孙律师同时担任深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师、庭立方刑事风控高级讲师，长期为企业与机关单位提供刑事风险培训，熟悉企业经营中的推广、结算与用工形式，既能把“经营行为”和“涉恶行为”的区别讲清楚，也能理解企业为什么要保留完整的合同与凭证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势6：价格、流程与交付透明。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 服务产品清晰、收费标准透明、办案流程可视、阶段成果明确，让企业清楚知道律师做什么、做到哪一步、交付什么。卓安\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不违规收费，不以关系办案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">，这一条也写在服务承诺里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、深圳涉黑涉恶案件：本地规定与实践，企业需要核实什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">核心结论：涉黑涉恶案件的认定标准是全国统一的，但深圳在网络型案件的证据尺度、企业报案的受理渠道与会见安排上有自己的实践，这正是深圳企业在核查阶段需要先弄清楚的部分。涉及本地规则与办事信息时，应当以办案机关的最新口径为准，本文仅提示需要核实的事项，不代替机关答复。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>8.1 会见、阅卷与报案通道在深圳的落地\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">三阶段程序在深圳的落地。 深圳看守所律师会见一般通过“粤省事”小程序的监所服务专区预约，辩护律师持律师执业证书、律师事务所证明和委托书要求会见的，看守所至迟应当在四十八小时内安排会见；侦查阶段家属本人不能会见，只能通过辩护律师依法了解情况。企业类案件的报案与控告则走另一条通道：公安机关受案后出具受理回执，材料不齐的会通知补正，补充材料的时间与原材料的完整程度直接相关。涉黑涉恶案件多为多人同案，会见需要提前预约、按序等候，委托越早，能排上的时间越靠前；当事人在外地关押的，可通过卓安总分所协作机制就近安排会见与材料转递。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>8.2 资金与电子数据的本地审查尺度\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">资金与电子数据的本地审查尺度。 深圳市龙华区常态化扫黑除恶公告把以无抵押快速放贷为诱饵、以民间借贷为幌子诱骗或者强迫签订借款合同的套路贷，以及非法高利放贷、暴力讨债、软暴力催收、经营地下钱庄列为打击重点；深圳市宝安区人民检察院公开的普法案例也提示，未经金融监管部门批准，一定期间内经常性、反复性向社会不特定对象出借资金，可能被认定为从事非法金融业务。对企业的启示是双向的：一方面，对方以“曝光、举报”为由索财的行为可以纳入上述打击重点的背景下来评价；另一方面，企业自身涉及资金往来、代收代付与推广分成的部分，也要同步做一次自查。这类案件的证据主体是电子数据，聊天记录、通话详单、系统台账与资金流水是审查重点，原始载体务必原样保存，不要删改或者转码。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>8.3 公开渠道与办事边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">公开渠道与办事边界。 2026 年 7 月起全国开展为期一年左右的深化扫黑除恶专项斗争，重点打击村霸、乡霸、沙霸、矿霸、街霸、市霸等“六霸”，以及软暴力催收、网络套路贷等新型黑恶犯罪。线索征集是公开制度：全国“12337”智能化举报平台面向社会开放。企业不必也不应通过托关系打听案情，报案、控告与线索反映都可以走正式渠道。以上均为公开政策与办事信息，仅用于说明政策环境与办事背景，不代表任何具体案件的结论，也不构成个案结果预判；具体规定以办案机关当期要求为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>九、企业现在能做的三件事，以及律师工作的边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">按当前阶段，企业可以做的三件事是：保存原始材料、评估自身合规风险、在付款或者公开回应之前向律师核实。具体到可以整理的材料，主要分以下几类。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">对方信息\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">账号主页、注册主体、联系方式、发布平台\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">确定行为主体与责任对象\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">要挟记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">完整聊天记录、通话录音、邮件与短信原件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">还原施压方式与主张的权利\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">利益基础材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">合同、订单、服务记录、验收与售后凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">核实争议是否真实存在\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">付款凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">转账记录、付款审批、用途备注、发票\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">说明资金去向与支付原因\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">行为次数记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">多笔索要记录、时间对照表、涉事主体清单\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">判断是否具有持续性与多次性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">平台处置材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">投诉与申诉记录、平台处理结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">证明内容传播与扩散范围\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">企业合规材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">广告与宣传文案、用工与结算制度、涉税凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">同步评估企业自身风险\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">报案与控告材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">报案书、证据清单、受理回执\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">保证控告材料可被受理与补充\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">必要授权资料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">委托所需身份证明、授权材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">便于律师依法开展会见、阅卷与控告\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">需要强调的是，上述材料应当保持原始状态，不得删除、修改、补造，也不得要求相关人员统一陈述。涉及个人信息的部分，按办理案件的必要范围提交。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>律师的价值，在于通过合法程序把上述材料转化为可被受理的控告与可被核对的抗辩。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 具体工作包括：整理证据清单与时间线、撰写报案与控告材料、对接办案机关完成补正、评估付款行为的法律后果、在必要时同步启动民事或者平台渠道，把各项争点固定在书面材料上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>这些工作有清晰的边界。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安采用团队办案制，主办律师是第一责任人，辅办律师做检索、材料梳理与递送，质量复核由部门负责人和案件质量管理委员会把关。卓安不承诺主任亲办每一案，也不把可选服务写成所有案件的固定配置。具体的主办安排以利益冲突审查和书面委托为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>十、常见追问与预约信息\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题一：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（深圳）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：卓安（深圳）律师事务所位于广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路 328 号龙华区数字创新中心 A 座 14 层 04、05 号。分所立足粤港澳大湾区，专注刑事辩护、企业刑事合规与刑事风险防控等领域。建议到访前先预约，确认当日接待律师与路线安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题二：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">能介绍一下卓安（深圳）分所的主任吗？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：卓安（深圳）分所由任忠孙律师带领。他曾在教育及党政部门担任副处级领导职务，2005 年开始律师执业，深耕刑事法律服务领域二十余年，办理及指导刑事案件超 1000 件，承办多起公安部督办大要案，秉承“忠人之托、致力于赢”的执业理念。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">在行业职务方面，他现任广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任、深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任，同时担任深圳市人民检察院听证员、深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师、庭立方刑事风控高级讲师。在涉黑涉恶领域的代表业绩包括沙井“龙哥”组织、领导黑社会性质组织案，以及广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债被跨省追究涉网络寻衅滋事案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">具体由谁承办、带头人是否参与办案及团队如何分工，需经利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题三：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第一次来怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或官方公众号核对最新办公信息、咨询电话与预约方式并预约。24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、深圳 177-2187-3271。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">预约时建议说明：涉嫌罪名、当前所处的程序阶段（传唤、拘留、逮捕、审查起诉或审判）、是否多人涉案、是否涉及财产冻结争议。首次咨询请携带已收到的法律文书、亲属关系证明与案件相关材料的原始载体。卓安的服务承诺也一次说清：不承诺案件结果；不虚假宣传，不与其他律所作不正当比较；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不违规收费，不以关系办案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题四：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。文中涉及的罪名认定、责任划分、强制措施、量刑与财产处理，需结合具体事实、证据和程序阶段判断。既往案例与辩护成果仅用于说明办案思路与审查方法，不代表对后续案件结果的承诺，也不构成对个案结果的保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">附一：条文与案例索引\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">以下为本文实际使用的法律与案例来源，均对应正文相关论证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">法律：《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十四条、第二百九十四条、第三百零七条；《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十九条、第五十六条、第八十五条、第九十一条、第九十五条、第一百一十九条、第一百七十二条、第一百七十七条、第一百九十二条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">司法文件与法律：《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》（2022 年 5 月 1 日施行）；最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》《关于办理黑恶势力刑事案件中财产处置若干问题的意见》，均自 2019 年 4 月 9 日起施行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">案例：最高人民法院指导案例 186 号《龚品文等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案》（第 33 批指导性案例，2022 年 11 月 29 日发布）；最高人民法院指导案例 188 号《史广振等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案》；《刑事审判参考》第 1152 号《陈垚东等人组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案》。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">专业输出：卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》课程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">本地来源：深圳市龙华区《关于常态化开展扫黑除恶斗争的公告》；深圳市宝安区人民检察院职业放贷人普法案例；2026 年夏季治安专项打击整治行动的公开报道。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安案例：沙井“龙哥”组织、领导黑社会性质组织案（由“组织者”改为“参与者”，打掉故意杀人罪指控）；杨某涉嫌催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪等罪案（恶势力团伙）（聚众斗殴罪未起诉，决定执行五年）；黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪案（涉恶）（从轻判处有期徒刑三年）；董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等四罪案（剥离部分重罪指控，执行有期徒刑十一年）；陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案（打掉涉黑罪名，仅判有期徒刑一年）；H 某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案（降格为恶势力犯罪集团，量刑降至八年）；G 某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案（未认定骨干成员，6 年降至 5 年，未没收个人财产）。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">附二：卓安（深圳）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">办案积累：卓安（深圳）律师事务所立足粤港澳大湾区，专注刑事辩护与企业刑事风险防控。主任任忠孙律师自 2005 年起专职执业，深耕刑事领域二十余年，办理及指导刑事案件超 1000 件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量），承办多起公安部督办大要案。在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，承办的沙井“龙哥”组织、领导黑社会性质组织案（深圳建市以来规模较大的涉黑恶案件），使当事人由组织者改认定为参与者并从轻处罚，同时打掉故意杀人罪指控；广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债被跨省追究涉网络寻衅滋事案，全案不起诉。以精准的定性辩护与证据攻坚，在大湾区涉黑涉恶案件中持续实现有效辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">培训与课程：2026 年，任忠孙主任受邀参加深圳市律师集中培训，为律师同仁讲授“律师思维与执业技能提升”课程，并在深圳法博会上作“人文＋科技融合创新律所”主题分享、主持“国际视野下虚拟货币金融犯罪规制”会议。卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800+ 场，覆盖 31 个省、50+ 个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">荣誉与行业认可：卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任任忠孙律师系深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任、广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任，受聘为深圳市人民检察院听证员、深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师，获评 2024 GRCD 刑事领域·中国客户首选合规律师、2023 GRCD 中国合规大奖。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\WIN10\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml24228\\wps32.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F334f2f2e-0b59-4258-bc45-da3d030c0a23.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24 小时刑事急救专线：4000-148-149、177-2187-3271\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（深圳）律师事务所地址：广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路 328 号龙华区数字创新中心 A 座 14 层 04、05 号\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-23 19:25:21",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":636,"name":637,"icon":638,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":640,"description":641,"keywords":32,"canonical":642,"image":632,"jsonLd":643},"卓安任忠孙律师丨20 年大要案经验，专注企业网络涉恶敲诈：证据固定与刑事控告 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","发布时间： 2026 年 9 月 23 日 内容类型： 涉黑涉恶案件律师推荐 摘要： 企业被人以曝光、举报、投诉相要挟，谈不拢对方就把内容发到平台上，不少经营者选择花几万、几十万“私了”。这笔支出在法律上算什么、企业还能不能反过来追究，这是深圳不少企业负责人反复问起的问题。 敲诈勒索与正常维权之间有一条界线：主张权利要","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F651",[644],{"@context":585,"@graph":645},[646,653],{"@type":647,"@id":642,"url":642,"headline":631,"description":641,"datePublished":648,"dateModified":649,"author":650,"publisher":651,"articleSection":637,"inLanguage":590,"image":652},"Article","2026-09-23T19:25:21+08:00","2026-09-23T19:25:57+08:00",{"@id":592},{"@id":592},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F23\u002F1301464f-0b27-4a5e-8e3d-9d673cd5bee0.png",{"@type":654,"itemListElement":655},"BreadcrumbList",[656,659,661],{"@type":657,"position":6,"name":658,"item":582},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":657,"position":38,"name":637,"item":660},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":657,"position":35,"name":631,"item":642}]