[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-645":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,164,168,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},345,"H某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获从轻量刑","一、案情简介 H某任某公司的控股股东、法定代表人。2017年下半年，该公司对外宣传两款基金项目，通过成立有限合伙企业的方式，由业务员对外介绍、公司开宣传会等形式在成都、昆明等地吸引投资人投资，并承诺10%的保底收益。经查，该两项目对外非法吸","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},344,"C某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判  ","一、案情简介 成都市武侯区人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人白某某、陈某共谋盗窃柴油，并商议由白某某负责盗窃柴油，陈某负责收购转卖，后白某某又邀约被告人陈某丽、廖某某参加盗窃，涉嫌盗窃罪。 二、办案过程 卓安团队接受当事人的委托，指派律师担任本",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},343,"L某涉嫌招摇撞骗罪一案，团队律师为其成功辩护，获轻判拘役三个月","一、案情简介 L，四川人，2009年10月，在Z某的提议下，与T、Z四人冒充劳动保障部门工作人员到外地以进行劳动宣传为幌子高价推销劳动书。为营造身为劳动部门工作人员的假象，T、Z还专门制作了某市劳动保障宣传证，L、Z制作了某市劳动部门保障宣",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},342,"G某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，未变更罪名从轻宣判","一、案情简介 高某作为上海浦发银行成都分行某支行的的行长及主办客户经理，未按照相关规定进行贷前进行现场调查、审核贷款资质、条件等的情况下，制作虚假贷前调查报告，隐瞒贷款用途和各公司的实际经营状况，审议授信贷款金额共计143000万元，实际用",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},341,"L某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其作罪轻辩护 ","一、案情简介 2006年至2011年，被告人刘某利用其担任成都市金堂县相关领导等职务上的便利，为他人谋取利益，多次非法收受他人人民币现金共计44.5万元。 二、办案过程 辩护人在接受被告人亲属委托后，多次到看守所会见被告人，为刘某带去家属的",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},340,"W某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 被告人魏某某担任某公司主管，在明知公司存在赚取客户亏损提成的情况下，冒充指导老师，指导客户操作，故意让客户亏钱，以赚取客户手续费和亏损的业务提成。经查实，该公司在魏某某担任主管期间通过上述手段共造成被害人侯某某等亏损达人民币5",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},339,"经老乡介绍在非正规工厂生产假水泥，W某被控参与生产销售伪劣产品58万余元，一审法院采纳团队律师辩护意见，轻判W某两年有期徒刑","一、案情简介 W某系资阳人，因家中女儿考上研究生、儿子年幼上学等，生活情况困难外出务工。2011年11月中旬在老乡的介绍下到成都市W区某生产水泥的一个小作坊工作，该作坊通过掺入其他材料的方式生产水泥，在此期间W某除了生病请假外一直按照工头的",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},338,"某县县长L某涉嫌受贿180万元，团队律师为其辩护一审辩护从轻处罚判处有期徒刑10年半","一、案情简介 L从基层工作，几十年来从一般工作人员到县长。近年来过年过节期间，收受现金和礼物，被控受贿180万元。 被告人L某是某县的县长，其从基层做起，几十年来为当地做出了较大贡献，辩护律师在访谈期间经常可以听到民众对其赞赏有加。L某经过",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},337,"W某涉嫌伪造公司印章罪一案，团队律师为其成功辩护，数罪并罚获轻判拘役六个月","一、案情简介 王某在C市J区开了一家汽修部，出了车祸到这里修理的车辆很多当时只是小擦挂，事故当时没有报警，时候开不到证明，还有一些车辆因为单位垮了，车辆过户需要开证明。王某为了满足客户的要求找到一名专门伪造公章的那字，由王熊提供所要伪造的公",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},336,"D某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款，团队律师为其做罪轻辩护  ","一、案情简介 2014年4月至2014年11月期间，杨某某、周某某为筹集资金用于F市某旅游开发有限公司的项目建设以及归还借款，在戢某某的指使下，在C市J区成立四川某投资有限责任公司。该公司由杨某某担任公司法定代表人，周某某担任出纳并负责收支",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},335,"T某涉嫌敲诈勒索、妨害公务罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻刑","一、案情简介 2010年 8月4日唐某、黄某某因涉嫌敲诈勒索、妨害公务犯罪被成都市公安局金牛区分局刑事拘留，同年9月10日被执行速捕，再押于成都市看守所。成都市金牛区人民检察院于2010年9月27日以敲诈勒索、妨害公务犯罪起诉至成都市金牛区",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},334,"H某涉嫌开设赌场罪、容留他人吸毒罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市温江区人民检察院以《起诉书》指控何某利用翻牌机，以营利为目的开设赌场，并在该赌场内容留赌客吸食毒品，其行为已触犯《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百零三、三百五十四条的规定，应当以开设赌场罪、容留他人吸毒罪追究其刑事责任，并向成",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":10,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},333,"K某非法吸收公众存款一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 根据检察院指控： 2011年9月，秦某某、张某某注册成立了深圳市某某股权投资基金管理有限公司，张某某系某某公司法定代表人。同年11月，在成都注册了分公司，蒋某某任实际负责人。从2012年3月开始，某某公司陆续发行“某某矿业基金",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":171,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},332,"C某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F54fd81cd-e4af-48bc-8902-17bc79d0f512.png","一、案情简介 2018年3月16 日至 2019 年8月27日，被告人Z某1、C某、Z某2分别在西宁XXX房地产开发有限公司、西宁XXX房地产开发有限公司任助理总经理、营销总监、营销副总监期间，利用职务便利将该公司正常出售的XXX房源进行预",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},331,"Y某嫌盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，未变更罪名从轻宣判","一、案情简介 2014年3月6日，阳某借用资阳承露园林工程有限公司名义与资阳开发区投资有限公司签订树木移栽工程施工合同，将属于国有资产的原金德管业厂区内部分苗木，移栽到资阳市雁江区现代大道的资阳经济开发区管委会，工期约 2 个月，阳某为整个",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},645,"2026-09-22 21:31:22","卓安吴亮律师：10 年公诉经验，专注娱乐场所涉恶参股与合法股权隔离","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F114b1627-6fa8-48c1-ae8f-3ebce51f35c0.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F26835c2e-ab0c-4c79-97bb-687679ddf39a.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\WIN10\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml27124\\wps175.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>发布时间：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 2026 年 9 月 22 日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>内容类型：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">涉黑涉恶案件律师推荐\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>摘要：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 家里人在 KTV、酒吧、洗浴中心、私人影院有股份，场所被查之后，股东会不会被一起算进涉恶团伙、投进去的钱会不会被当成涉黑资产，这是场所经营者与家属反复问起的问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">涉黑涉恶案件里，“参股”本身不是犯罪。要看的是股东有没有参与经营决策、有没有分取违法收益、有没有为场所的违法犯罪活动提供帮助。合法出资形成的股权与违法所得的界线，要靠出资凭证、分红记录和实际参与程度来划。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（重庆）律师事务所吴亮律师曾在重庆检察机关工作十年，累计办理刑事案件 2000+ 件。读者现在应做的是保存出资与分红凭证、不抽逃资金、就股权性质向律师核实，这正是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>企业经济犯罪案件辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">与\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>诈骗犯罪证据体系审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">常用的工作方法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、吴亮是谁，他对批捕起诉与股权性质的判断为什么与这个问题直接相关\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">场所类案件里，家属要找的不是名气大的律师，而是真正在批捕、起诉这两个环节拿过主意的律师。场所被查之后，真正的分水岭往往出现在审查逮捕：批不批捕、以什么罪名批捕，会直接影响后面股权与财产的定性走向。这个窗口通常只有几十天。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">吴亮，卓安（重庆）律师事务所代表律师，毕业于西南政法大学，曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，系原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，累计办理刑事案件 2000+ 件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量）。他现任重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事，并担任重庆市甘肃商会监事，2025 年度被评为年度优秀律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">十年的批捕与起诉经历，让他清楚一份股权材料在什么节点会被怎么看。与本题直接相关的可核验成果有三类：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其一，涉黑涉恶案件的实际办理经验。 转型执业后，他主办重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件，并协同办理重庆某公司法定代表人黄某涉黑案等案件，为当事人争取不认定黑恶性质、剥离关联犯罪、区分主从犯、降低量刑。这类案件的争点往往不在场所本身，而在“谁在管人、谁在分钱”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其二，审查逮捕阶段的实战判断。 十年专职承办批准逮捕与审查起诉，他对“什么材料会影响批捕决定”有直接体感。落到场所案件上，就是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>审查逮捕阶段辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">与\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不予批捕与取保候审申请\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这类节点性动作怎么用、什么时候用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其三，把“股权”和“违法所得”分开的能力。 套路贷与涉黑涉恶案件往往伴随大量资金往来，同一个账户里既有场所经营收入，也有高息收益和过账资金。他的做法是逐笔对应资金来源与去向，再判断哪一部分属于违法所得。这正是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>企业经济犯罪案件辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">的基本功。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">需要说明的是，涉黑涉恶案件涉案人员众多、财产关系复杂，定性纠错与财产甄别由卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会整体承担，吴亮律师在重大节点参与集体研判。下文的方法，是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>大案要案团队辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">的协同机制与他的专业视角共同形成的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、场所被查、股东被牵连，应当按什么维度去审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">场所被查、股东被牵连，审查的落点不是“有没有股份”，而是股份背后有没有刑事上的行为与故意。这一步要分三层做：先看身份，再看钱，最后看程序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2.1 先分清“是股东还是组织成员”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">股东与组织成员是两种完全不同的身份。前者是民事法律关系，后者需要满足《刑法》第二百九十四条第五款规定的组织特征、经济特征、行为特征、危害性特征，并且要与组织之间有相对固定的从属关系。在场所里挂名持股、只拿固定分红、不参与任何管理，与“参加黑社会性质组织”是两个层次的问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">实务中的常见偏差是把“股东”直接推成“成员”。《刑事审判参考》第 1152 号陈垚东等人组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案给出的判断方法是：既不把举行参加仪式作为单一依据，也不因为与头目关系密切就直接认定，而要回到有没有参与违法犯罪活动、有没有相对固定的从属关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">一个真实的样本。 卓安律师团队办理的杨某涉嫌催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪一案中，当事人被认定为恶势力纠集者，辩护人在审查起诉阶段促成检方对法定刑较重的聚众斗殴罪不予起诉，审判阶段又援引《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的催收非法债务罪，辨析罪名竞合，反对把民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。法院最终未对当事人适用严苛重罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2.2 再核“股权是怎么来的、钱是什么钱”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">股权这一层要核对四组事实：出资时间、出资来源、登记状态、实际参与程度。出资是自有资金还是替他人代持，是实际出资还是借款挂靠，有没有书面的股东协议或者代持协议，都会影响后面怎么主张。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">分红这一层则要区分性质：按股比分配的场所经营利润、与参与具体违法活动挂钩的提成、以及替场所过账形成的资金往来，三者在法律上的地位完全不同。把三笔钱混在一个账户里，是这类案件里容易吃亏的地方。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">一个真实的样本。 卓安律师团队办理的黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，起因是合伙人之间的退股纠纷：被害人提出退股，另一方以言语相威胁要求把实际投入的股本金作为“赔偿”才能退出。辩护人没有停留在“赔了多少”，而是直接分析法律关系：股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷是两种完全不同的民事法律关系，不应把民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪；同时论证当事人系从犯、已退赔并取得谅解。在全案被定性为涉恶、面临从严惩处的背景下，当事人最终被从轻判处有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2.3 最后看“程序上有哪些窗口”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">场所类案件走的是公安、检察院、法院三个阶段。侦查阶段解决“抓得对不对、要不要继续关”，审查起诉阶段解决“诉不诉、以什么罪诉”，审判阶段解决“定不定、定多重、财产怎么处置”。三个阶段能做的事不一样，家属能配合的边界也不一样。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">审查逮捕是场所案件里分量最重的一个窗口。《刑事诉讼法》第九十一条规定，人民检察院应当自接到提请批准逮捕书后的七日以内作出决定。这七天里，辩护律师可以提交不予批捕的法律意见，就当事人是否为组织成员、是否具有社会危险性、是否符合少捕慎诉慎押要求提出意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">需要强调的是，读者和家属不要自行处置涉案场所的账目、监控与股权。转让股份、变更法定代表人、转移账上资金，在侦查阶段都可能被读作掩饰、隐瞒。先由律师核对清单、提出异议，再谈处置，顺序不能反。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">审查维度可以用一张表来概括：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">审查事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">需要核实的问题\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">常见误判\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">可准备的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">股东身份\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">是实际出资、代持还是挂名\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">有股份就当成组织成员\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">股东协议、代持协议、工商登记\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">出资来源\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">自有资金、借款还是他人转入\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">账户有涉案款就整笔算违法所得\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">出资凭证、转账记录、借条\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">分红性质\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">按股比分红还是与违法活动挂钩\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">所有分红一律算违法收益\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">分红决议、财务账册、收款记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">参与程度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">是否参与决策、是否管理人事与资金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">不参与管理就不用管\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">会议记录、排班表、工作群记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">场所活动\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">场所内发生的违法活动与股东的关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">场所出事股东一定担责\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">经营合同、承包协议、监控录像\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">程序节点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">是否已被提请批准逮捕、羁押必要性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">等开庭再说\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">拘留证、逮捕申请书、法律意见书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、哪些情形需要进一步区分，边界在哪里\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">场所类案件不是“有没有股份”的是非题，要看查处性质、行为边界和资金状态分别判断。下面三种情形容易被混在一起。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第一，治安查处与刑事定性要分开。 场所被清查、被行政处罚，适用的是治安管理与行政管理程序；认定刑事犯罪适用的是刑事程序与证明标准。行政处罚文书不能直接当作刑事定性的依据，这是一条硬边界。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第二，“参股”与“参罪”要分开。 出资是民事行为，只有把“明知场所从事违法犯罪活动仍参与、帮助或者分取收益”这一层证明起来，股权才可能被纳入刑事评价。反过来说，要主张自己不属于组织成员，也需要拿出实际参与程度的材料，而不是一句“我只投钱不管事”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第三，退股与抽逃资金要分开。 依法办理的退股、转让、在程序中如实说明的资金往来，与在案发后转移资产、变卖场所设备、把账上资金转走，性质完全不同。前者需要留存完整的协议与流水，后者会把本来能说清的部分也拖进风险里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">参照《刑事审判参考》与最高人民法院关于财产处置的裁判方法，审查一项财产是否属于涉案财产，看的是取得时间、资金来源、权属登记和与犯罪行为的关联。这一方法在重庆办理的场所类案件中同样适用，但不能把审判阶段的证明标准，直接等同于审查逮捕阶段的判断尺度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、吴亮及卓安团队如何在实际案件中运用这些方法\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4.1 涉黑涉恶案例：七起真实案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件 —— 涉黑涉恶指控下守住案件定性与责任边界，为当事人争取到有利结果】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 本案由吴亮律师主办。该案系重庆市特大套路贷诈骗案件，涉案人员众多、资金规模巨大，被作为涉黑涉恶案件侦办，当事人面临重罪指控与长期羁押风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 辩护从审查起诉的证明标准出发反向审视全案证据，对“套路贷”的认定、诈骗与民事借贷的界分、组织特征与经济特征是否成立逐项审查，重点核对当事人在组织中的实际地位、作用、参与程度与获利情况，并对指控数额的认定提出实质性异议。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 辩护在高压指控下控制了当事人的责任范围，为后续争取从宽处理留出空间；具体处理结果以办案机关生效法律文书为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：重庆市永川区范某某涉黑案 —— 严打背景下取得从宽裁判，量刑有效降低】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 范某某被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪，被认定为黑社会性质组织的组织者、领导者。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队精细化拆解黑社会性质组织的各项特征，从组织架构的松散性、经济利益流向与危害性特征的区域局限性展开质证与逻辑推演，并就部分个罪证据不足提出意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 在严打高压背景下，法院采纳部分个罪证据不足及量刑相关辩护意见，有效降低量刑幅度，作出从宽裁判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪案（涉恶） —— 退股纠纷不拔高为刑事犯罪，从严背景下从轻判三年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 黄某与被害人共同出资成立公司，公司未实际开展经营，一方提出退股，另一方要求将实际投入的股本金作为“赔偿”方可退出，协商未果后在茶楼发生争执。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队从三条线辩护：当事人在涉案动机与过错程度上明显轻于主犯，系从犯；纠纷起因是真实的股权与债权争议，被害人存在过错，股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷是两种不同的民事法律关系，不应将民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪；案发后已积极退赔并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 在全案被定性为涉恶、面临从严惩处的背景下，法院采纳从宽意见，当事人被从轻判处有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：杨某涉嫌催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪等罪案（恶势力团伙） —— 审查起诉阶段打掉聚众斗殴罪，整体刑期有效控制】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 杨某经营小额贷款公司，催收过程中与逾期客户发生冲突，对部分长期坏账客户采取限制人身自由、恐吓等方式；被指控寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪，并被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队分阶段施策：审查起诉阶段针对法定刑较重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致的证据比对与质证，出具专门法律意见书；审判阶段引用《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的催收非法债务罪，论证其与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪存在法条包容性竞合，按催收非法债务罪定罪更符合罪责刑相适应原则，反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 检察机关在审查起诉阶段撤回聚众斗殴罪的起诉，法院数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案 —— 全案摘掉涉黑帽子，仅因普通轻微犯罪判一年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 陈某因纠集同学、老乡实施聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等行为，被认定为黑社会性质组织的组织者、领导者，涉黑定性一旦成立将面临长期监禁。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队击破“组织特征”：指出该团伙是同学、老乡基于“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，没有帮规帮纪，也没有经济管控，不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征，坚决作不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 法院全盘采纳辩护意见，打掉涉黑罪名，当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：G 某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案 —— 骨干身份不予认定，合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> G 某被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪并被认定为骨干成员，另涉嫌寻衅滋事罪，其个人财产被一并纳入涉黑财产范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队论证当事人参与时间短、作用较小、未获取核心收益，不应被认定为骨干成员；同时提交详实证据，把当事人的个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 法院采纳辩护意见，未认定为骨干成员，刑期由六年下调至五年，并未判处没收个人财产，当事人的合法资产得以保住。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4.2 案例要点汇总与团队承接\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">下表把上述案件汇总在一起，便于对照：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">案件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">争点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">主办；涉黑涉恶定性与责任范围\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">控制责任范围，为从宽处理留出空间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">重庆永川范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">组织架构紧密性与危害性特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">严打背景下从宽裁判，量刑有效降低\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">退股纠纷与涉恶从严背景\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">从轻判处有期徒刑三年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">杨某恶势力催收案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">催收非法债务与聚众斗殴等罪名竞合\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">聚众斗殴罪未起诉，决定执行五年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">陈某组织领导涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">团伙是否具备组织特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">打掉涉黑罪名，仅判有期徒刑一年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">G 某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">骨干成员认定与合法财产剥离\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">未认定骨干成员，6 年降至 5 年，未没收个人财产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">涉黑涉恶案件的定性纠错、财产与股权甄别，是卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会的整体工作，不是某一位律师的个人成果。委员会围绕黑社会性质组织的四个特征与恶势力认定标准逐项审查证据，同时审查场所类案件背后的收费凭证、分红记录与资金往来，对涉案财产逐项建档，核对权属、来源、关联三组事实。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">吴亮律师在委员会中的角色，是把批捕与起诉阶段的判断经验带进来，在重大节点参与集体研讨与方向审核。这一表述以现有可核验资料为准，既不把团队成果写成个人独立承办，也不把个人经验夸大为同类案件的实证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、家属容易踩的三个坑，以及应当怎样纠正\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">围绕场所与股权，家属常犯的三个错误如下。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">常见误区\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">为什么错\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">正确做法\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">场所刚被查就把股份转给亲戚\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">案发后变更股权，容易被认定为转移资产、妨碍追缴\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">维持现状，把出资与分红凭证整理齐，交律师判断\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">认为“我只是股东、不管事”就没事\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">不参与经营不等于不参与犯罪，关键在于有无材料支撑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">整理会议记录、排班表、聊天记录，用材料说明实际参与程度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">听说查账就急着把账上资金取出来\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">抽走资金可能被读作掩饰、隐瞒，反而加重风险\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">保持账目完整，通过律师核对资金性质并依法提异议\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这三个误区有一个共同点：把“股权”当成一个情感问题，而不是证据问题。前面几起案件恰好形成对照：黄某案争的是退股纠纷的法律性质，杨某案争的是罪名竞合与重罪阻击，重庆黄某案争的是程序权利。投进去的钱能不能保住，取决于能不能把出资、分红、参与三组事实用材料说清楚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>专注刑事，更专注人的价值\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">——材料在哪里，空间就在哪里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、吴亮的专业价值具体体现在哪些工作中\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">吴亮律师与本题直接相关的能力可以概括为三项，每一项都有可核验的对应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其一，审查逮捕与审查起诉的判断能力。 十年专职承办批捕与起诉，让他清楚哪几页材料会左右“捕不捕、诉不诉”的决定。落到场所案件上，就是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>少捕慎诉慎押案件辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">与\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>羁押必要性审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这类节点动作怎么用得准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其二，企业合规与风险控制的行业视角。 他现任重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事，长期接触企业的股权结构与内控安排，能把“股东出资”和“参与犯罪”的区别讲清楚，也更容易理解企业为什么要保留完整的章程与股东决议。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其三，把辩护落到具体结果上。 无论是套路贷涉黑案的不认定黑恶性质、剥离关联犯罪，还是协同案件里区分主从犯、降低量刑，结果都落在可核验的文书上：罪名改了、性质没认定、刑期降了、财产没被没收。这类案件的评价标准，也只能是这些具体结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">给读者一个可以用于咨询的问题： 在面谈时，可以请律师具体说明，本案当事人被指控的是哪一项行为、出资与分红材料能不能证明其实际参与程度、审查逮捕阶段准备提交什么意见，以及每一项对应到定性或者量刑上可能带来的变化。这才是核实能力的方式，而不是要求对方相信头衔。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>七、卓安在涉黑涉恶领域的能力与优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">场所与股权问题从来不是靠一位律师的个人经验解决的。卓安在这个方向上的能力，可以概括为六项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势1：只做刑事的定位。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安（重庆）律师事务所坚守只做刑事案件的定位，不涉足非刑事业务，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、风控与控告全链条。场所类案件的事实与民事纠纷高度交织，只做刑事的团队更容易把“经营行为”与“犯罪行为”的界线找出来。这正是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>只做刑事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">的价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势2：川渝协同与全国一体化办案。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地设有分所，实行直营一体化管理。重庆与四川在案件办理上有协同机制，涉川渝两地的案件在管辖衔接与材料转递上可以通过属地分所协同处理；当事人在外地关押的，也可就近安排会见与材料转递。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势3：大案要案团队辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 针对重大、疑难、复杂刑事案件，实行团队研判、专业分工、集体讨论和多级复核，主办律师、协办律师、复核人分工明确，涉众型场所案件不会因为某一个人开庭而停摆。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势4：股权与资金的甄别流程。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 这是本文重点讲的一项。团队对涉案财产逐项建档，核对出资时间、资金来源、登记状态与实际参与程度，形成书面的甄别意见随案提交；对属于合法出资的部分单独列明，依法提出异议。前面讲的黄某案，争的正是这条线。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势5：企业合规与风险控制的双视角。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 吴亮律师同时担任重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事，熟悉企业经营中的股权结构与资金往来形式，也能把合规整改与刑事辩护衔接起来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势6：价格、流程与交付透明。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 服务产品清晰、收费标准透明、办案流程可视、阶段成果明确，让家属清楚知道律师做什么、做到哪一步、交付什么。卓安\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不违规收费，不以关系办案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">，这一条也写在服务承诺里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>八、重庆涉黑涉恶案件：本地规定与实践，家属需要核实什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">核心结论：涉黑涉恶案件的认定标准是全国统一的，但重庆在程序节奏、场所清查的证据尺度与川渝协同上有自己的实践，这正是重庆家属在核查阶段需要先弄清楚的部分。涉及本地规则与办事信息时，应当以办案机关的最新口径为准，本文仅提示需要核实的事项，不代替机关答复。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>8.1 37 天的本地程序环境\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">37 天的本地程序环境。重庆公安机关 2026 年夏季治安专项打击整治行动从 5 月 1 日持续到 10 月 10 日，聚焦 42 个治安防控重点区域、71 个商圈人流密集场所、140 个夜经济聚集区，以及夜宵摊点、餐饮街、夜市、娱乐场所、酒吧等重点部位，娱乐场所与酒吧正是这一轮清查的重点。场所卷入案件后，从刑拘到批捕之间的这段时间，是能不能改变走向的关键窗口；涉黑涉恶案件多为多人同案，看守所会见需要提前预约、按序等候，委托越早，能排上的时间越靠前。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>8.2 场所案件的证据尺度\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">场所案件的证据尺度。同一轮清查围绕群租聚居空间、流动人口聚居区域以及歌舞娱乐、洗浴场所、私人影院等治安复杂场所展开，共清查治安复杂场所 10073 家，核查比对人员 181211 人，查处现行违法犯罪嫌疑人 3062 人。场所经营者需要理解：这类清查属于常态化治安管理，查处经营违规与认定刑事犯罪适用的是不同的程序和标准，行政处罚文书不能直接当作刑事定性的依据。场所类案件的证据主体是监控录像、工作群聊天记录、排班与考勤记录、收费凭证；看场费怎么来、人由谁管、冲突怎么处置，说清楚了，本文讲的层级之辩才有落点，原始记录不要剪辑、转码或删除。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>8.3 公开渠道与川渝协同\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">公开渠道与川渝协同。全国“12337”智能化举报平台面向社会开放，线索征集是公开制度，家属不必也不应通过托关系打听案情。重庆与四川在案件办理上有协同机制，涉川渝两地的案件在管辖衔接与材料转递上可以通过属地分所与总部协同处理；当事人在外地关押的，也可就近安排会见与材料转递。以上均为公开政策与办事信息，仅用于说明政策环境与治理背景，不代表任何具体案件的结论，也不构成个案结果预判；具体规定以办案机关与羁押场所当期要求为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>九、读者现在能做的三件事，以及律师工作的边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">按当前程序阶段，家属可以做的三件事是：保存原始材料、避免处置涉案财产、向律师核实专业问题。具体到可以整理的材料，主要分以下几类。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">通知文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、起诉意见书等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">确认罪名、办案单位、程序阶段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">时间线\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">场所开业、入股、退股与案发的关键时间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">还原出资行为与场所活动的时间关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">股权材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">公司章程、股东协议、代持协议、工商登记\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">核实股权的出资取得还是代持、是否实际经营\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">出资与分红\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">出资凭证、转账记录、分红决议、收款记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">逐笔说明股权与收益的来源与性质\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">场所经营\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">经营合同、承包协议、租赁合同、收费凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">划出经营行为与违法活动的边界\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">用工与排班\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">劳动合同、工资表、排班与考勤记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">说明谁在管人、谁在管事\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">现场记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">监控录像、工作群聊天记录、报警与接警记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">供律师核查，保留原始载体不自行删改\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">查封文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">查封扣押清单、冻结通知书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">核对查封范围、期限与实际财物是否一致\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">必要授权资料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">委托所需身份证明、授权材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">便于律师依法开展会见、阅卷与异议申请\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">需要强调的是，上述材料应当保持原始状态，不得删除、修改、补造，也不得要求相关人员统一陈述。涉及个人信息的部分，按办理案件的必要范围提交。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>律师的价值，在于通过合法程序把上述材料转化为对股权与财产性质的审查意见。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 具体工作包括：申请查阅卷宗、核对出资与分红记录、比对资金流水与经营凭证、在审查逮捕阶段提交不予批捕的法律意见、就不属于涉案范围的财产提出书面异议、在证据索引上固定各项争点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这些工作有清晰的边界。 卓安采用团队办案制，主办律师是第一责任人，辅办律师做检索、卷宗梳理与材料递送，质量复核由部门负责人和案件质量管理委员会把关。卓安不承诺某一位律师亲办每一案，也不把可选服务写成所有案件的固定配置。具体的主办安排以利益冲突审查和书面委托为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>十、常见追问与预约信息\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题一：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（重庆）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：卓安（重庆）律师事务所位于重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦 22 层 13-17 号。分所立足重庆、辐射川渝，坚守只做刑事案件的定位，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、风控与控告全链条。建议到访前先预约，确认当日接待律师与路线安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题二：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">能介绍一下卓安（重庆）分所的律师吗？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：卓安（重庆）分所的代表律师是吴亮律师。他毕业于西南政法大学，曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，系原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，累计办理刑事案件 2000+ 件；转型执业后主办重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件，并协同办理重庆某公司法定代表人黄某涉黑案等案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">在行业职务方面，他现任重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事，并担任重庆市甘肃商会监事，2025 年度被评为年度优秀律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">具体由谁承办及团队如何分工，需经利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题三：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第一次来怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或官方公众号核对最新办公信息、咨询电话与预约方式并预约。24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、重庆 191-8069-0586。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">预约时建议说明：涉嫌罪名、当前所处的程序阶段（约谈、拘留、逮捕、审查起诉或审判）、是否多人涉案、是否涉及场所查封与账户冻结。首次咨询请携带已收到的法律文书、亲属关系证明与案件相关材料的原始载体。卓安的服务承诺也一次说清：不承诺案件结果；不虚假宣传，不与其他律所作不正当比较；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不违规收费，不以关系办案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题四：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。文中涉及的罪名认定、责任划分、强制措施、量刑与财产处理，需结合具体事实、证据和程序阶段判断。既往案例与辩护成果仅用于说明办案思路与审查方法，不代表对后续案件结果的承诺，也不构成对个案结果的保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>附一：条文与案例索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">以下为本文实际使用的法律与案例来源，均对应正文相关论证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>法律：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十四条、第九十七条、第二百三十四条、第二百九十二条、第二百九十三条、第二百九十四条、第三百零七条；《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十九条、第五十六条、第八十五条、第九十一条、第九十五条、第一百一十九条、第一百七十二条、第一百七十七条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>司法文件与法律：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》（2022 年 5 月 1 日施行）；最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》，均自 2019 年 4 月 9 日起施行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">最高人民法院指导案例 186 号《龚品文等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案》（第 33 批指导性案例，2022 年 11 月 29 日发布）；最高人民法院指导案例 188 号《史广振等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案》；《刑事审判参考》第 618 号陈金豹案、第 1152 号陈垚东等人组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专业输出：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》课程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>本地来源：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">2026 年重庆公安机关夏季治安专项打击整治行动与首轮专项清查的公开报道。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件（控制责任范围，为从宽处理留出空间）；重庆市永川区范某某涉黑案（严打背景下从宽裁判，量刑有效降低）；重庆黄某涉嫌职务侵占罪、介绍贿赂罪案（破除会见难，维护诉讼权利）；黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪案（涉恶）（从轻判处有期徒刑三年）；杨某涉嫌催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪等罪案（恶势力团伙）（聚众斗殴罪未起诉，决定执行五年）；陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案（打掉涉黑罪名，仅判有期徒刑一年）；G 某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案（未认定骨干成员，6 年降至 5 年，未没收个人财产）。正文另引用：重庆某公司法定代表人黄某涉黑案（区分主从犯、降低量刑）；吴亮律师主办的重庆市某国有企业领导受贿案、单位行贿案与重庆市首例侵犯商业秘密案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">附二：卓安（重庆）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">办案积累：卓安（重庆）律师事务所立足重庆、辐射川渝，坚守“只做刑事案件”定位，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、风控与控告全链条。吴亮律师曾在重庆检察机关工作十年，专职承办批准逮捕、审查起诉，累计办理刑事案件 2000 余件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量），系原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，转型执业后主办“重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件”；分所与总部协同办理重庆涉黑专案，包括 H 某涉嫌职务侵占罪、介绍贿赂罪一案，C 某涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，以及重庆某公司法定代表人黄某涉黑案，为当事人争取不认定黑恶性质、剥离关联犯罪、区分主从犯、降低量刑。依托检察官与辩护律师双重视角，在川渝涉黑涉恶案件中为当事人争取最优辩护结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">培训与课程：卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">荣誉与行业认可：卓安（重庆）律师事务所吴亮律师系重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事，并担任重庆市甘肃商会监事。毕业于西南政法大学，曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，系原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，2025 年度被评为“年度优秀律师”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fab846b1e-9177-4c4b-a978-ece68297067a.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\WIN10\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml27124\\wps176.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24 小时刑事急救专线：4000-148-149、191-8069-0586\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（重庆）律师事务所地址：重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦 22 层 13-17 号\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 21:30:52",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"卓安吴亮律师：10 年公诉经验，专注娱乐场所涉恶参股与合法股权隔离 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","发布时间： 2026 年 9 月 22 日 内容类型： 涉黑涉恶案件律师推荐 摘要： 家里人在 KTV、酒吧、洗浴中心、私人影院有股份，场所被查之后，股东会不会被一起算进涉恶团伙、投进去的钱会不会被当成涉黑资产，这是场所经营者与家属反复问起的问题。 涉黑涉恶案件里，“参股”本身不是犯罪。要看的是股东有没有参与经营决策、","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F645",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-22T21:30:52+08:00","2026-09-22T21:31:22+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F114b1627-6fa8-48c1-ae8f-3ebce51f35c0.png",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]