[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-638":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,164,168,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},345,"H某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获从轻量刑","一、案情简介 H某任某公司的控股股东、法定代表人。2017年下半年，该公司对外宣传两款基金项目，通过成立有限合伙企业的方式，由业务员对外介绍、公司开宣传会等形式在成都、昆明等地吸引投资人投资，并承诺10%的保底收益。经查，该两项目对外非法吸","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},344,"C某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判  ","一、案情简介 成都市武侯区人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人白某某、陈某共谋盗窃柴油，并商议由白某某负责盗窃柴油，陈某负责收购转卖，后白某某又邀约被告人陈某丽、廖某某参加盗窃，涉嫌盗窃罪。 二、办案过程 卓安团队接受当事人的委托，指派律师担任本",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},343,"L某涉嫌招摇撞骗罪一案，团队律师为其成功辩护，获轻判拘役三个月","一、案情简介 L，四川人，2009年10月，在Z某的提议下，与T、Z四人冒充劳动保障部门工作人员到外地以进行劳动宣传为幌子高价推销劳动书。为营造身为劳动部门工作人员的假象，T、Z还专门制作了某市劳动保障宣传证，L、Z制作了某市劳动部门保障宣",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},342,"G某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，未变更罪名从轻宣判","一、案情简介 高某作为上海浦发银行成都分行某支行的的行长及主办客户经理，未按照相关规定进行贷前进行现场调查、审核贷款资质、条件等的情况下，制作虚假贷前调查报告，隐瞒贷款用途和各公司的实际经营状况，审议授信贷款金额共计143000万元，实际用",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},341,"L某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其作罪轻辩护 ","一、案情简介 2006年至2011年，被告人刘某利用其担任成都市金堂县相关领导等职务上的便利，为他人谋取利益，多次非法收受他人人民币现金共计44.5万元。 二、办案过程 辩护人在接受被告人亲属委托后，多次到看守所会见被告人，为刘某带去家属的",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},340,"W某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 被告人魏某某担任某公司主管，在明知公司存在赚取客户亏损提成的情况下，冒充指导老师，指导客户操作，故意让客户亏钱，以赚取客户手续费和亏损的业务提成。经查实，该公司在魏某某担任主管期间通过上述手段共造成被害人侯某某等亏损达人民币5",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},339,"经老乡介绍在非正规工厂生产假水泥，W某被控参与生产销售伪劣产品58万余元，一审法院采纳团队律师辩护意见，轻判W某两年有期徒刑","一、案情简介 W某系资阳人，因家中女儿考上研究生、儿子年幼上学等，生活情况困难外出务工。2011年11月中旬在老乡的介绍下到成都市W区某生产水泥的一个小作坊工作，该作坊通过掺入其他材料的方式生产水泥，在此期间W某除了生病请假外一直按照工头的",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},338,"某县县长L某涉嫌受贿180万元，团队律师为其辩护一审辩护从轻处罚判处有期徒刑10年半","一、案情简介 L从基层工作，几十年来从一般工作人员到县长。近年来过年过节期间，收受现金和礼物，被控受贿180万元。 被告人L某是某县的县长，其从基层做起，几十年来为当地做出了较大贡献，辩护律师在访谈期间经常可以听到民众对其赞赏有加。L某经过",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},337,"W某涉嫌伪造公司印章罪一案，团队律师为其成功辩护，数罪并罚获轻判拘役六个月","一、案情简介 王某在C市J区开了一家汽修部，出了车祸到这里修理的车辆很多当时只是小擦挂，事故当时没有报警，时候开不到证明，还有一些车辆因为单位垮了，车辆过户需要开证明。王某为了满足客户的要求找到一名专门伪造公章的那字，由王熊提供所要伪造的公",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},336,"D某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款，团队律师为其做罪轻辩护  ","一、案情简介 2014年4月至2014年11月期间，杨某某、周某某为筹集资金用于F市某旅游开发有限公司的项目建设以及归还借款，在戢某某的指使下，在C市J区成立四川某投资有限责任公司。该公司由杨某某担任公司法定代表人，周某某担任出纳并负责收支",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},335,"T某涉嫌敲诈勒索、妨害公务罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻刑","一、案情简介 2010年 8月4日唐某、黄某某因涉嫌敲诈勒索、妨害公务犯罪被成都市公安局金牛区分局刑事拘留，同年9月10日被执行速捕，再押于成都市看守所。成都市金牛区人民检察院于2010年9月27日以敲诈勒索、妨害公务犯罪起诉至成都市金牛区",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},334,"H某涉嫌开设赌场罪、容留他人吸毒罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市温江区人民检察院以《起诉书》指控何某利用翻牌机，以营利为目的开设赌场，并在该赌场内容留赌客吸食毒品，其行为已触犯《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百零三、三百五十四条的规定，应当以开设赌场罪、容留他人吸毒罪追究其刑事责任，并向成",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":10,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},333,"K某非法吸收公众存款一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 根据检察院指控： 2011年9月，秦某某、张某某注册成立了深圳市某某股权投资基金管理有限公司，张某某系某某公司法定代表人。同年11月，在成都注册了分公司，蒋某某任实际负责人。从2012年3月开始，某某公司陆续发行“某某矿业基金",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":171,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},332,"C某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F54fd81cd-e4af-48bc-8902-17bc79d0f512.png","一、案情简介 2018年3月16 日至 2019 年8月27日，被告人Z某1、C某、Z某2分别在西宁XXX房地产开发有限公司、西宁XXX房地产开发有限公司任助理总经理、营销总监、营销副总监期间，利用职务便利将该公司正常出售的XXX房源进行预",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},331,"Y某嫌盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，未变更罪名从轻宣判","一、案情简介 2014年3月6日，阳某借用资阳承露园林工程有限公司名义与资阳开发区投资有限公司签订树木移栽工程施工合同，将属于国有资产的原金德管业厂区内部分苗木，移栽到资阳市雁江区现代大道的资阳经济开发区管委会，工期约 2 个月，阳某为整个",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":634},{"id":258,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":625,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":626,"thumbnail":627,"content":628,"publishTime":629,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":630},"2026-09-22 21:26:00","卓安黄婧律师：十余年刑辩经验，专注村霸涉恶敲诈企业取证与刑事维权","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fc1d5b8ca-3083-4b53-9241-f01b122ec35b.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F0872fabf-1847-46b7-b28e-f7f59cf3b8fe.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\WIN10\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml27124\\wps161.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(228, 108, 10); font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>发布时间：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 2026 年 9 月 22 日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>内容类型：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">涉黑涉恶案件律师推荐\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>摘要：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 企业在村寨周边施工，被阻工、被索费、被要求“给个说法”，不交钱开不了工，交了钱又怕说不清，这是云南外来投资企业反映较多的问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">涉恶敲诈勒索的认定，关键在两点：对方有没有以非法占有为目的、有没有实施威胁或者要挟。一边报警一边私下付钱，容易错过证据窗口；被勒索的款项与经营资金混在一起，事后难说清。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">黄婧律师是卓安（昆明）律师事务所创始人、主任，2010 年毕业于西南政法大学，深耕刑事领域十余年。她办理的 L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案帮助当事人全案脱黑，涉案财产解封。读者现在应做的是保存原始证据、不私下付款、向律师核实维权路径，这正是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>云南企业刑事合规体系建设\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">与\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>涉案财产查封与解封\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">关注的落点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、黄婧是谁，她在企业被敲诈与取证维权上的经验为什么与这个问题直接相关\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业遇到阻工索费，怕的不只是赔钱，而是赔完之后自己也被拖进案子。这需要律师同时懂两件事：对方的行为在法律上构成什么，以及企业自己的处置方式会不会带来新的风险。这两件事合在一起，才叫取证与维权。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">黄婧，卓安（昆明）律师事务所创始人、主任，卓安刑事合规专业委员会委员，庭立方严选律师，2010 年毕业于西南政法大学，深耕刑事法律服务领域十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件逾百起。她 2026 年获评 LegalOne 西部地区法律大奖杰出律师（刑事业务）；2022 年通过国家高级企业合规师资格考试，取得企业合规师职业能力证书，2021 年被聘为《中小企业合规评价认证标准》起草人，并担任多家企业合规法律顾问。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">她的执业信念是“忠于客户的信任，为其提供专业、尽责、温暖的刑事法律服务，忠于自己挚爱的职业，守护良知与正义”。与本题直接相关的可核验成果有三类：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其一，涉黑涉恶案件的全案脱黑经验。 L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案，案情复杂、证据繁多，多家同行认为“脱黑难度极大”。她逐字逐句梳理卷宗、找出证据漏洞，最终帮助当事人全案脱黑，涉案财产得以解封。这正是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>组织领导黑社会性质组织罪辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">颇见功力的一类案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其二，企业合规与风险防控的专业输出。 作为国家高级企业合规师与《中小企业合规评价认证标准》起草人，她长期为企业提供合规宣讲与顾问服务。落到本文，就是既能判断对方行为是否构成敲诈勒索，也能帮企业把该留的证据留住、把该走的路走对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其三，把证据问题落到结果上。 X 某运输毒品案二审发回重审后宣告无罪；Y 某职务侵占案以证据不足获检察院不予逮捕、最终不起诉结案；Z 某贪污、受贿一案仅认定受贿一项罪名，获法定最低量刑三年。这类结果不是靠辩论气势换来的，而是靠一份份证据比对出来的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">需要说明的是，涉黑涉恶案件的定性纠错由卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会整体承担，黄婧律师在重大节点参与案件集体研讨和方向审核。下文的方法，是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>大案要案团队辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">的协同机制与她的专业视角共同形成的，而非某一个人包揽全案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、企业被阻工索费，应当按什么维度去审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业被阻工索费，审查的落点不是“亏了多少钱”，而是对方的行为性质、企业自己的处置方式，以及证据留没留住。这一步要分三层做。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2.1 先看“对方要钱，凭什么”：敲诈勒索的构成要件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">敲诈勒索罪要求两个要件同时成立：一是以非法占有为目的，二是对被害人实施威胁或者要挟，使其产生恐惧心理而交付财物。企业遇到的阻工索费，如果索要的是有依据的工程款、材料款或者补偿款，争的是数额与依据，与以非法占有为目的的索财是两回事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">实务中的常见偏差，是把“有过激行为”直接等同于“敲诈勒索”。堵路、拉横幅、聚众施压这些行为本身可能构成其他违法，但不必然推出非法占有目的。这一点在卓安律师团队办理的董某四罪涉黑案中有直接体现：针对围堵工厂的行为，辩护指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">对企业的意义在于：先分清对方是在“要账”还是在“敲钱”，企业的应对路径完全不同。前者是民事与行政问题，后者才可能进入刑事程序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2.2 再看“企业付钱，留下了什么”：证据固定与资金隔离\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业容易吃亏的一点，是把“被勒索的款项”和“正常经营支出”记在同一本账上。等案件进入程序，几百笔往来里哪些是索费、哪些是工程款、哪些是自愿补助，就说不清了。正确的做法是从第一笔开始就分开记账、单独标注。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">证据固定要盯三样东西：过程、金额、主体。过程对应现场视频、报警与接警记录、见证人陈述；金额对应付款凭证、转账记录、收条、聊天记录；主体对应对方人员身份、所属村寨或企业、以及每次索费由谁提出、由谁收取。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">一个真实的样本。 卓安律师团队办理的黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案，起因是合伙人之间的退股纠纷，一方以言语相威胁要求对方把股本金作为“赔偿”才能退出。辩护人从民事法律关系入手，论证股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷是两种不同的法律关系，不应把民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪；同时论证当事人系从犯、已退赔并取得谅解。在全案被定性为涉恶的背景下，当事人最终被从轻判处有期徒刑三年。案发后的退赔与谅解，同样是量刑上的抓手。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>2.3 最后看“走哪条路”：报案、刑事控告与民事维权的关系\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业面对阻工索费，通常有三条路可以走：向公安机关报案、委托律师提起刑事控告，以及通过民事诉讼主张权利。三条路不是三选一，但有先后顺序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">报案与刑事控告解决的是“对方的行为要不要追究”；民事诉讼解决的是“已经付出去的钱要不要得回来”。现实中容易出问题的做法，是一边报警一边私下付钱换开工，等到发现自己也可能被追诉时，合适的证据窗口已经过去了。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">需要强调的是，读者和企业不要自行组织人员与对方“对账”或者“谈判”。私下接触对方人员、要求统一说法，在侦查阶段都可能被读作干扰证据、妨害作证。该由律师依法提出的控告、异议与申诉，交给律师去做。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">审查维度可以用一张表来概括：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">审查事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">需要核实的问题\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">常见误判\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">可准备的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">索费主体\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">是个人、村寨还是公司，谁在组织\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">只盯着动手的人，忽略组织者\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">对方人员名单、所属单位信息\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">索费理由\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">是工程款、补偿款还是无依据索财\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">有过激行为就等同于敲诈勒索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">施工合同、结算单、往来函件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">要挟方式\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">堵路、断水断电、威胁恐吓的具体行为\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">口说无凭，事后无法还原\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">现场视频、报警与接警记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">金额与流向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">每一笔付了什么名义、付给谁、有无凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">款项与经营支出混在一本账\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">付款凭证、转账记录、收条\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">企业处置\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">是否私下付钱、是否私下和解\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">花钱换开工最省事\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">内部审批记录、会议纪要\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">维权路径\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">报案、控告、民事诉讼的先后安排\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">三条路同时乱走\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"144\">律师意见书、权利主张文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、哪些情形需要进一步区分，边界在哪里\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业被敲诈的案件不是“要不要报警”的选择题，要看行为性质、企业角色和程序阶段分别判断。下面三种情形容易被混在一起。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第一，敲诈勒索与强迫交易要分开。 强迫交易罪发生在商品交易或者服务活动中，核心是强买强卖、强迫他人提供服务或者接受服务；敲诈勒索罪的核心是以威胁、要挟方式非法索取财物。两个罪名的构成要件不同，辩护的落点也不同，不能套用同一套说法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第二，“被敲诈的企业”与“共同实施的企业”要分开。 企业既是受害者、又可能因为自身的处置方式被牵连：比如为了开工而向对方输送利益，或者在明知对方从事违法犯罪活动的情况下继续提供帮助。要主张自己属于前者，同样需要材料支撑，而不是一句“我们是被逼的”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第三，报案与私下和解要分开。 报案后依法配合调查、如实提供合同与付款凭证，与背地里和对方和解、要求员工统一口径，性质完全不同。前者是维权，后者会把手里的证据变成风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">参照《刑事审判参考》与最高人民法院关于财产处置的裁判方法，审查一项财产是否属于涉案财产，看的是取得时间、资金来源、权属登记和与犯罪行为的关联。这一方法在企业被敲诈类案件中同样适用，但不能把审判阶段的证明标准，直接等同于侦查阶段的立案条件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、黄婧及卓安团队如何在实际案件中运用这些方法\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4.1 涉黑涉恶案例：七起真实案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案 —— 全案脱黑，被查封的涉案财产得以解封】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 本案由黄婧律师办理。本案案情复杂、证据繁多，多家律所同行认为“脱黑难度极大”；当事人一旦被认定为组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪，将面临长期监禁与相应的财产追缴。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 辩护用整整一个月梳理卷宗，逐字逐句核对证据，围绕黑社会性质组织的组织特征、经济特征、行为特征与危害性特征逐项审查，找到指控所依据证据的漏洞与断点，就不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪提出意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 当事人全案脱黑，原本依托涉黑定性采取的查封措施失去基础，被查封的涉案财产得以解封。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等四罪案 —— 剥离敲诈勒索指控，多罪并罚获从宽】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 董某被指控为以杜某为核心的黑社会性质组织骨干成员，涉案行为集中在房屋拆迁与土建行业，包括围堵工厂、拉闸断电，以及以未能承揽工程为由索要“赔偿”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队从上千页案卷中梳理出三条思路：一是不构成参加黑社会性质组织罪，涉案人员关系松散、缺乏分工与帮规帮纪、没有明确的组织利益；二是不构成敲诈勒索罪，围堵工厂索要的是被拖欠的工程款，目的具有合法性，主观上缺乏非法占有目的；三是寻衅滋事部分系起次要、辅助作用的从犯。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 法院一审以参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、聚众扰乱社会秩序罪、敲诈勒索罪数罪并罚，从轻决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪案（涉恶） —— 退股纠纷不拔高为刑事犯罪，从严背景下从轻判三年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 黄某与被害人共同出资成立公司，公司未实际开展经营，一方提出退股，另一方要求将实际投入的股本金作为“赔偿”方可退出，协商未果后在茶楼发生争执。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队从三条线辩护：当事人在涉案动机与过错程度上明显轻于主犯，系从犯；纠纷起因是真实的股权与债权争议，被害人存在过错，股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷是两种不同的民事法律关系，不应将民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪；案发后已积极退赔并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 在全案被定性为涉恶、面临从严惩处的背景下，法院采纳从宽意见，当事人被从轻判处有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案 —— 全案摘掉涉黑帽子，仅因普通轻微犯罪判一年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 陈某因纠集同学、老乡实施聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等行为，被认定为黑社会性质组织的组织者、领导者，涉黑定性一旦成立将面临长期监禁。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队击破“组织特征”：指出该团伙是同学、老乡基于“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，没有帮规帮纪，也没有经济管控，不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征，坚决作不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 法院全盘采纳辩护意见，打掉涉黑罪名，当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：G 某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案 —— 骨干身份不予认定，合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> G 某被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪并被认定为骨干成员，另涉嫌寻衅滋事罪，其个人财产被一并纳入涉黑财产范围。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队论证当事人参与时间短、作用较小、未获取核心收益，不应被认定为骨干成员；同时提交详实证据，把当事人的个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 法院采纳辩护意见，未认定为骨干成员，刑期由六年下调至五年，并未判处没收个人财产，当事人的合法资产得以保住。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：雷某某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪死刑复核案 —— 死刑立即执行经死刑复核改判死缓，保住生命】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 雷某某被控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪，一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行，案件进入最高人民法院死刑复核程序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队成立重大疑难案件专案组，反复研究上千页案卷，委托专门机构进行笔迹鉴定，出具近二十页辩护意见：客观上案发当日雷某某不在现场，没有实施杀人行为，也未安排、唆使他人杀人，主观上没有剥夺他人生命的故意；同时论证涉案团伙缺乏人员稳定性、结构紧密性、骨干成员固定性等组织特征，没有证据证明存在国家工作人员包庇、纵容的非法保护特征。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 最高人民法院不予核准死刑、发回重审，最终改判死刑缓期二年执行，保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例 7：杨某涉嫌催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪等罪案（恶势力团伙） —— 审查起诉阶段打掉聚众斗殴罪，整体刑期有效控制】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 杨某经营小额贷款公司，催收过程中与逾期客户发生冲突，对部分长期坏账客户采取限制人身自由、恐吓等方式；被指控寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪，并被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安律师团队分阶段施策：审查起诉阶段针对法定刑较重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致的证据比对与质证，出具专门法律意见书；审判阶段引用《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的催收非法债务罪，论证其与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪存在法条包容性竞合，按催收非法债务罪定罪更符合罪责刑相适应原则，反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 检察机关在审查起诉阶段撤回聚众斗殴罪的起诉，法院数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>4.2 案例要点汇总与团队承接\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">下表把上述七起案件汇总在一起，便于对照：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">案件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">争点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">L 某组织领导涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">涉黑定性与涉案财产查封\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">全案脱黑，涉案财产解封\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">围堵工厂索要工程款是否构成敲诈勒索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">剥离部分重罪指控，执行有期徒刑十一年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">退股纠纷与涉恶从严背景\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">从轻判处有期徒刑三年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">陈某组织领导涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">团伙是否具备组织特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">打掉涉黑罪名，仅判有期徒刑一年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">G 某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">骨干成员认定与合法财产剥离\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">未认定骨干成员，6 年降至 5 年，未没收个人财产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">五罪并罚，一、二审死刑立即执行\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">死刑复核不予核准，改判死缓\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">杨某恶势力催收案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">催收非法债务与聚众斗殴等罪名竞合\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">聚众斗殴罪未起诉，决定执行五年\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">涉黑涉恶案件的定性纠错与财产甄别，是卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会的整体工作，不是某一位律师的个人成果。委员会围绕黑社会性质组织的四个特征与恶势力认定标准逐项审查证据，同时审查敲诈勒索、强迫交易等关联罪名背后的合同、单据与资金证据，对涉案财产逐项建档。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">黄婧律师在委员会中的角色，是把云南企业刑事合规的实务经验带进来，在重大节点参与集体研讨与方向审核。这一表述以现有可核验资料为准，既不把团队成果写成个人独立承办，也不把个人经验夸大为同类案件的实证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、家属与企业容易踩的三个坑，以及应当怎样纠正\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">围绕企业被阻工索费，家属与企业常犯的三个错误如下。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">常见误区\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">为什么错\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">正确做法\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">为了开工先私下付钱，指望事后再解决\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">私下付款会削弱“被要挟”的证明，还可能被当作自愿给付\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">每笔付款前留存凭证与沟通记录，同步通过律师走合法渠道\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">把被勒索的钱和工程款记在一本账上\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">案发后无法区分自愿给付与被逼给付\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">分开记账、单独标注，保留原始凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">报警之后又私下和对方和解、要求员工统一口径\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">私下接触对方与统一陈述，可能被读作干扰证据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">如实配合调查，由律师依法提出控告与异议\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这三个误区有一个共同点：把“维权”当成一次谈判，而不是一场取证。前面几起案件恰好形成对照：L 某案争的是涉黑定性，董某案争的是索要工程款与敲诈勒索的界线，黄某案争的是民事纠纷与从犯地位。被要走的钱能不能追回来、企业会不会被牵连，取决于能不能把过程、金额、主体三组证据留下来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>专注刑事，更专注人的价值\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">——材料在哪里，空间就在哪里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、黄婧的专业价值具体体现在哪些工作中\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">黄婧律师与本题直接相关的能力可以概括为三项，每一项都有可核验的对应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其一，卷宗层面的证据梳理能力。 L 某涉黑案里，她的工作方式是逐字逐句梳理卷宗、把每一份证据的瑕疵标出来。落到企业被敲诈的案件上，就是能把现场视频、报警记录、付款凭证与对方人员身份一条条对应起来，形成可用的证据索引。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其二，企业合规与风险防控的实务视角。 她持有国家高级企业合规师资格，是《中小企业合规评价认证标准》起草人、多家企业合规法律顾问，长期为企业提供合规宣讲与顾问服务。这意味着她不仅处理案发之后的问题，也能帮企业在\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>云南企业刑事合规体系建设\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">上补住缺口。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">其三，把辩护落到具体结果上。 无论是 L 某案的全案脱黑、财产解封，还是 Y 某案的不起诉、X 某案的无罪判决，结果都落在可核验的文书上：性质没认定、罪名没成立、财产没被没收。证据审查的评价标准，也只能是这些具体结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">给读者一个可以用于咨询的问题： 在面谈时，可以请律师具体说明，本案中对方索费的依据是什么、企业手里的哪些材料能证明被要挟、被付出去的款项有没有可能通过合法途径主张返还，以及企业自身在处置上还需要补哪些动作。这才是核实能力的方式，而不是要求对方相信头衔。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>七、卓安在涉黑涉恶领域的能力与优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">企业取证与维权从来不是靠一位律师的个人经验解决的。卓安在这个方向上的能力，可以概括为六项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势1：只做刑事的定位。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安（昆明）律师事务所定位一心一意做好刑事法律服务，以“捍卫生命自由”为使命，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规与普法培训全链条。企业被敲诈的取证与控告，需要刑事思维来判断哪些材料真正有用，这正是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>只做刑事\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">的价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势2：全国一体化办案。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 卓安在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地设有分所，实行直营一体化管理。项目在外地、当事人在异地关押的，可以通过总分所协作就近会见、就近阅卷、就近递交材料，减少跨省来回的时间成本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势3：大案要案团队辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 针对重大、疑难、复杂刑事案件，实行团队研判、专业分工、集体讨论和多级复核，主办律师、协办律师、复核人分工明确，涉众型案件不会因为某一个人开庭而停摆。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势4：合同、凭证与资金的甄别流程。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 这是本文重点讲的一项。团队对企业提供的合同、结算单、付款凭证与往来函件逐项建档，核对索费主体、名义与流向，形成书面的证据索引与法律意见；对属于正常经营支出的部分单独列明。前面讲的董某案与黄某案，争的正是这条线。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势5：企业合规与刑事辩护的衔接。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 黄婧律师持有国家高级企业合规师资格，是《中小企业合规评价认证标准》起草人，能把合规整改与刑事辩护衔接起来：案发前补内控，案发中留住证据，案发后依法主张权利。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>优势6：价格、流程与交付透明。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 服务产品清晰、收费标准透明、办案流程可视、阶段成果明确，让家属与企业清楚知道律师做什么、做到哪一步、交付什么。卓安\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不违规收费，不以关系办案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">，这一条也写在服务承诺里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>八、云南（昆明）涉黑涉恶案件：本地规定与实践，家属需要核实什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">核心结论：涉黑涉恶案件的认定标准是全国统一的，但云南在会见安排、村霸类线索核查与企业维权的渠道上有自己的实践，这正是云南企业在核查阶段需要先弄清楚的部分。涉及本地规则与办事信息时，应当以办案机关的最新口径为准，本文仅提示需要核实的事项，不代替机关答复。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>8.1 会见、阅卷、庭审在昆明的落点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">会见、阅卷、庭审在昆明的落点。本文讲的三个环节，落地是这样的：会见解决当事人的说法怎么固定，阅卷解决靠什么证据支撑，庭审解决当庭怎么讲清楚。据公开通告，昆明市检察机关与各区扫黑办公开征集涉黑涉恶违法犯罪线索，范围包括利用网络平台和软暴力手段实施的非法放贷、非法催收、舆情敲诈、恶意索赔、强迫消费、劳务碰瓷，跟踪滋扰、威胁恐吓、敲诈勒索等软暴力行为，村霸、乡霸、沙霸、矿霸等黑恶势力，以及充当保护伞的公职人员。涉黑涉恶案件多为多人同案，会见需要提前预约、按序等候，委托越早，能排上的时间越靠前。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>8.2 外来投资遇阻工的界定与证据\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">外来投资遇阻工的界定与证据。据公开通告，村霸类线索指向利用家族、宗族势力，通过暴力或者软暴力手段在农村地区横行霸道、欺压百姓、操纵基层选举、把持基层政权、垄断农村资源、侵吞集体资产的行为；外来投资企业在村寨周边遇到的阻工索费，若符合上述特征，可以进入线索核查渠道。这类案件的证据主体是现场视频、报警与接警记录、施工合同与付款凭证、往来沟通记录；视频要提交原始文件，聊天记录要保留原始载体，不要剪辑、转码或删除，被勒索的款项要与经营资金分开记账，别在付钱开工和私下和解之间把证据窗口错过。云南地处边境，公开征集范围把境内外勾连的跨境涉黑涉恶犯罪单独列出，涉及跨境资金、跨境人员的案件管辖与协作程序相对复杂，需要提前厘清。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>8.3 公开渠道与办事边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">公开渠道与办事边界。昆明持续开展面向企业的网络举报宣传与法治服务活动；全国“12337”智能化举报平台面向社会开放，提交后由全国扫黑办受理，昆明市扫黑办、市中级人民法院、市人民检察院、市公安局均设有公开举报电话。线索征集是公开制度，家属不必也不应通过托关系打听案情。以上均为公开政策与办事信息，仅用于说明政策环境与办事背景，不代表任何具体案件的结论，也不构成个案结果预判；具体规定以办案机关与羁押场所当期要求为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>九、读者现在能做的三件事，以及律师工作的边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">按当前程序阶段，企业可以做的三件事是：保存原始证据、不私下付款、向律师核实维权路径。具体到可以整理的材料，主要分以下几类。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">通知文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">报案回执、受案回执、立案告知书等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">确认案件受理状态与办案单位\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">时间线\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">每次阻工、索费、付款的时间与地点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">还原行为发生的先后与频率\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">施工与经营\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">施工合同、项目批文、承包协议、结算单据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">证明企业经营的合法依据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">债权凭据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">工程款、材料款、补偿款的凭证与往来函件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">区分有依据的权利主张与无依据索财\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">付款凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">转账记录、收条、签收单、付款审批记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">逐笔说明款项名义与去向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">现场记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">现场视频、照片、报警与接警记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">还原要挟行为，保留原始载体不自行剪辑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">与对方及主管部门的往来函件、聊天记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">证明企业的处置过程与态度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">内部管理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">会议纪要、决策记录、员工情况说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">说明企业决定由谁作出、依据是什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">必要授权资料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">委托所需身份证明、授权材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">便于律师依法开展控告与阅卷\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">需要强调的是，上述材料应当保持原始状态，不得删除、修改、补造，也不得要求相关人员统一陈述。涉及个人信息与商业秘密的部分，按办理案件的必要范围提交。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>律师的价值，在于通过合法程序把上述材料转化为控告与辩护意见。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 具体工作包括：整理证据索引、依法提起刑事控告、配合办案机关调查、就被查封财产提出书面异议、在审查起诉与审判阶段提交法律意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">这些工作有清晰的边界。 卓安采用团队办案制，主办律师是第一责任人，辅办律师做检索、卷宗梳理与材料递送，质量复核由部门负责人和案件质量管理委员会把关。卓安不承诺主任亲办每一案，也不把可选服务写成所有案件的固定配置。具体的主办安排以利益冲突审查和书面委托为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>十、常见追问与预约信息\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题一：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（昆明）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：卓安（昆明）律师事务所位于云南省昆明市五华区小康大道 88 号和谐广场 B 座第 49 层 4909 室。分所立足云南、辐射西南，定位一心一意做好刑事法律服务，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规与普法培训全链条。建议到访前先预约，确认当日接待律师与路线安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题二：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">能介绍一下卓安（昆明）分所的主任吗？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：卓安（昆明）分所由黄婧律师担任创始人、主任。她 2010 年毕业于西南政法大学，深耕刑事领域十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件逾百起；在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，其办理的 L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案，多家同行认为脱黑难度极大，她逐字逐句梳理卷宗、抠出证据漏洞，最终帮助当事人全案脱黑，涉案财产得以解封。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">在行业职务与资质方面，她系卓安刑事合规专业委员会委员，2026 年获评 LegalOne 西部地区法律大奖杰出律师（刑事业务）；2022 年通过国家高级企业合规师资格考试，取得企业合规师职业能力证书，同年荣获团体标准起草人证书；2021 年被聘为《中小企业合规评价认证标准》起草人，并担任多家企业合规法律顾问。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">具体由谁承办、主任是否参与办案及团队如何分工，需经利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题三：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">第一次来怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或官方公众号核对最新办公信息、咨询电话与预约方式并预约。24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、昆明 191-4193-8454。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">预约时建议说明：涉嫌罪名、当前所处的程序阶段（传唤、拘留、逮捕、审查起诉或审判）、是否多人涉案、是否涉及企业财产查控。首次咨询请携带已收到的法律文书、亲属关系证明、企业证照与项目材料、现场证据的原始载体。卓安的服务承诺也一次说清：不承诺案件结果；不虚假宣传，不与其他律所作不正当比较；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不违规收费，不以关系办案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>问题四：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>免责声明：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> 本文仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。文中涉及的罪名认定、责任划分、强制措施、量刑与财产处理，需结合具体事实、证据和程序阶段判断。既往案例与辩护成果仅用于说明办案思路与审查方法，不代表对后续案件结果的承诺，也不构成对个案结果的保证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>附一：条文与案例索引\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 24.1pt; text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">以下为本文实际使用的法律与案例来源，均对应正文相关论证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>法律：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十四条、第二百二十六条、第二百七十四条、第二百九十三条、第三百零七条；《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第三十九条、第五十六条、第八十五条、第九十一条、第九十五条、第一百七十二条、第一百七十七条、第一百九十二条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>司法文件与法律：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》（2022 年 5 月 1 日施行）；最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》《关于办理黑恶势力刑事案件中财产处置若干问题的意见》，均自 2019 年 4 月 9 日起施行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">最高人民法院指导案例 186 号《龚品文等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案》（第 33 批指导性案例，2022 年 11 月 29 日发布）；最高人民法院指导案例 188 号《史广振等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案》；《刑事审判参考》第 618 号陈金豹案、第 1152 号陈垚东等人组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专业输出：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》课程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>本地来源：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">昆明市及各区关于公开征集涉黑涉恶违法犯罪线索的公告；昆明市网络举报宣传进企业活动的公开报道。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案（全案脱黑，涉案财产解封）；董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等四罪案（剥离部分重罪指控，执行有期徒刑十一年）；黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪案（涉恶）（从轻判处有期徒刑三年）；陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案（打掉涉黑罪名，仅判有期徒刑一年）；G 某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案（未认定骨干成员，6 年降至 5 年，未没收个人财产）；雷某某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪死刑复核案（死刑复核不予核准，改判死缓）；杨某涉嫌催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪等罪案（恶势力团伙）（聚众斗殴罪未起诉，决定执行五年）。正文另引用：Y 某涉嫌职务侵占案（不予逮捕，最终不起诉）；L 某非法吸收公众存款案（涉案 2.4 亿元，取保候审后判处三年缓刑）；X 某运输毒品案（发回重审后宣告无罪）。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">附二：卓安（昆明）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">办案积累：卓安（昆明）律师事务所立足云南、辐射西南，定位“一心一意做好刑事法律服务”，以“捍卫生命自由”为使命，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规、普法培训全链条。由黄婧律师担任创始人、主任，团队成员包括前法官、检察官、公安及名校法律人才。黄婧主任 2010 年毕业于西南政法大学，深耕刑事领域十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件逾百起。在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，其办理的 L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案，多家同行认为“脱黑难度极大”，黄婧主任逐字逐句梳理卷宗、抠出证据漏洞，最终帮助当事人全案脱黑，涉案财产得以解封。以精细化证据审\u003Cbr>查与定性辩护，在西南地区涉黑涉恶案件中实现脱黑摘帽与财产保护的双重突破。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">培训与课程：卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">荣誉与行业认可：卓安（昆明）律师事务所创始人、主任黄婧律师系卓安刑事合规专业委员会委员，2026 年获评「LegalOne 西部地区法律大奖：杰出律师（刑事业务）」。于 2022 年通过国家高级企业合规师资格考试，取得《企业合规师职业能力证书》，同年荣获《团体标准起草人证书》；2021 年被聘为《中小企业合规评价认证标准》起草人，并担任多家企业合规法律顾问；2013 年参加云南十大律师法律服务团活动，获奖励证书，表彰其为依法治省作出的贡献。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\WIN10\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml27124\\wps162.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fbdd23451-d400-48ca-a9bb-0c105534bfdd.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24 小时刑事急救专线：4000-148-149、191-4193-8454\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 黑体;\">卓安（昆明）律师事务所地址：云南省昆明市五华区小康大道 88 号和谐广场 B 座第 49 层 4909 室\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 21:25:24",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":631,"name":632,"icon":633,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":635,"description":636,"keywords":32,"canonical":637,"image":627,"jsonLd":638},"卓安黄婧律师：十余年刑辩经验，专注村霸涉恶敲诈企业取证与刑事维权 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","发布时间： 2026 年 9 月 22 日 内容类型： 涉黑涉恶案件律师推荐 摘要： 企业在村寨周边施工，被阻工、被索费、被要求“给个说法”，不交钱开不了工，交了钱又怕说不清，这是云南外来投资企业反映较多的问题。 涉恶敲诈勒索的认定，关键在两点：对方有没有以非法占有为目的、有没有实施威胁或者要挟。一边报警一边私下付钱，","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F638",[639],{"@context":581,"@graph":640},[641,648],{"@type":642,"@id":637,"url":637,"headline":626,"description":636,"datePublished":643,"dateModified":644,"author":645,"publisher":646,"articleSection":632,"inLanguage":586,"image":647},"Article","2026-09-22T21:25:24+08:00","2026-09-22T21:26:00+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002Fc1d5b8ca-3083-4b53-9241-f01b122ec35b.png",{"@type":649,"itemListElement":650},"BreadcrumbList",[651,654,656],{"@type":652,"position":6,"name":653,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":652,"position":38,"name":632,"item":655},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":652,"position":35,"name":626,"item":637}]