[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-615":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,164,168,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},345,"H某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获从轻量刑","一、案情简介 H某任某公司的控股股东、法定代表人。2017年下半年，该公司对外宣传两款基金项目，通过成立有限合伙企业的方式，由业务员对外介绍、公司开宣传会等形式在成都、昆明等地吸引投资人投资，并承诺10%的保底收益。经查，该两项目对外非法吸","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},344,"C某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判  ","一、案情简介 成都市武侯区人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人白某某、陈某共谋盗窃柴油，并商议由白某某负责盗窃柴油，陈某负责收购转卖，后白某某又邀约被告人陈某丽、廖某某参加盗窃，涉嫌盗窃罪。 二、办案过程 卓安团队接受当事人的委托，指派律师担任本",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},343,"L某涉嫌招摇撞骗罪一案，团队律师为其成功辩护，获轻判拘役三个月","一、案情简介 L，四川人，2009年10月，在Z某的提议下，与T、Z四人冒充劳动保障部门工作人员到外地以进行劳动宣传为幌子高价推销劳动书。为营造身为劳动部门工作人员的假象，T、Z还专门制作了某市劳动保障宣传证，L、Z制作了某市劳动部门保障宣",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},342,"G某涉嫌违法发放贷款罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，未变更罪名从轻宣判","一、案情简介 高某作为上海浦发银行成都分行某支行的的行长及主办客户经理，未按照相关规定进行贷前进行现场调查、审核贷款资质、条件等的情况下，制作虚假贷前调查报告，隐瞒贷款用途和各公司的实际经营状况，审议授信贷款金额共计143000万元，实际用",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},341,"L某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其作罪轻辩护 ","一、案情简介 2006年至2011年，被告人刘某利用其担任成都市金堂县相关领导等职务上的便利，为他人谋取利益，多次非法收受他人人民币现金共计44.5万元。 二、办案过程 辩护人在接受被告人亲属委托后，多次到看守所会见被告人，为刘某带去家属的",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},340,"W某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 被告人魏某某担任某公司主管，在明知公司存在赚取客户亏损提成的情况下，冒充指导老师，指导客户操作，故意让客户亏钱，以赚取客户手续费和亏损的业务提成。经查实，该公司在魏某某担任主管期间通过上述手段共造成被害人侯某某等亏损达人民币5",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},339,"经老乡介绍在非正规工厂生产假水泥，W某被控参与生产销售伪劣产品58万余元，一审法院采纳团队律师辩护意见，轻判W某两年有期徒刑","一、案情简介 W某系资阳人，因家中女儿考上研究生、儿子年幼上学等，生活情况困难外出务工。2011年11月中旬在老乡的介绍下到成都市W区某生产水泥的一个小作坊工作，该作坊通过掺入其他材料的方式生产水泥，在此期间W某除了生病请假外一直按照工头的",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},338,"某县县长L某涉嫌受贿180万元，团队律师为其辩护一审辩护从轻处罚判处有期徒刑10年半","一、案情简介 L从基层工作，几十年来从一般工作人员到县长。近年来过年过节期间，收受现金和礼物，被控受贿180万元。 被告人L某是某县的县长，其从基层做起，几十年来为当地做出了较大贡献，辩护律师在访谈期间经常可以听到民众对其赞赏有加。L某经过",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},337,"W某涉嫌伪造公司印章罪一案，团队律师为其成功辩护，数罪并罚获轻判拘役六个月","一、案情简介 王某在C市J区开了一家汽修部，出了车祸到这里修理的车辆很多当时只是小擦挂，事故当时没有报警，时候开不到证明，还有一些车辆因为单位垮了，车辆过户需要开证明。王某为了满足客户的要求找到一名专门伪造公章的那字，由王熊提供所要伪造的公",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},336,"D某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款，团队律师为其做罪轻辩护  ","一、案情简介 2014年4月至2014年11月期间，杨某某、周某某为筹集资金用于F市某旅游开发有限公司的项目建设以及归还借款，在戢某某的指使下，在C市J区成立四川某投资有限责任公司。该公司由杨某某担任公司法定代表人，周某某担任出纳并负责收支",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},335,"T某涉嫌敲诈勒索、妨害公务罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻刑","一、案情简介 2010年 8月4日唐某、黄某某因涉嫌敲诈勒索、妨害公务犯罪被成都市公安局金牛区分局刑事拘留，同年9月10日被执行速捕，再押于成都市看守所。成都市金牛区人民检察院于2010年9月27日以敲诈勒索、妨害公务犯罪起诉至成都市金牛区",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},334,"H某涉嫌开设赌场罪、容留他人吸毒罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市温江区人民检察院以《起诉书》指控何某利用翻牌机，以营利为目的开设赌场，并在该赌场内容留赌客吸食毒品，其行为已触犯《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百零三、三百五十四条的规定，应当以开设赌场罪、容留他人吸毒罪追究其刑事责任，并向成",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":10,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},333,"K某非法吸收公众存款一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 根据检察院指控： 2011年9月，秦某某、张某某注册成立了深圳市某某股权投资基金管理有限公司，张某某系某某公司法定代表人。同年11月，在成都注册了分公司，蒋某某任实际负责人。从2012年3月开始，某某公司陆续发行“某某矿业基金",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":171,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},332,"C某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，获轻判","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F22\u002F54fd81cd-e4af-48bc-8902-17bc79d0f512.png","一、案情简介 2018年3月16 日至 2019 年8月27日，被告人Z某1、C某、Z某2分别在西宁XXX房地产开发有限公司、西宁XXX房地产开发有限公司任助理总经理、营销总监、营销副总监期间，利用职务便利将该公司正常出售的XXX房源进行预",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},331,"Y某嫌盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，未变更罪名从轻宣判","一、案情简介 2014年3月6日，阳某借用资阳承露园林工程有限公司名义与资阳开发区投资有限公司签订树木移栽工程施工合同，将属于国有资产的原金德管业厂区内部分苗木，移栽到资阳市雁江区现代大道的资阳经济开发区管委会，工期约 2 个月，阳某为整个",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},615,"2026-09-22 17:47:41","家人只是给老板开车、跑腿，还陪着催过几次账，为什么会被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪？","https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1790069320683.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1790069320683.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>公司型涉黑案件中，普通员工家属最需要问清楚的十个问题\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会出品\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>场景说明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>家人在一家经营多年的公司工作，平时负责开车、接送、跑腿，偶尔陪老板处理纠纷、催收欠款。后来老板和多名员工被一并抓获，公安机关认为该公司长期通过暴力、威胁或其他手段承揽工程、催收债务、排挤竞争者，涉嫌形成黑社会性质组织。家人被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪，同时还可能涉及敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事、强迫交易等罪名。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、公司里的人一起被抓，公司就可能被认定为黑社会性质组织吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>多人被抓并不等于公司就是黑社会性质组织，定性必须回到《刑法》第二百九十四条规定的四项特征本身。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《刑法》第二百九十四条要求黑社会性质组织同时具备组织特征、经济特征、行为特征和危害性特征。公司有老板、有员工、有部门分工，只能证明其具备一般经营组织的外观。要把一家企业认定为黑社会性质组织，还必须证明其内部层级服务于违法犯罪活动，企业收入或者其他经济利益被用于维系组织，违法犯罪活动具有组织性和持续性，并且最终在一定区域或者行业形成非法控制或者重大影响。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>真正需要查明的，不是\"这家公司有没有人犯罪\"，而是违法犯罪是否已经成为维系公司利益、管理成员和争夺市场的组织性手段，公司是否由此建立了不同于正常经营规则的非法秩序。把多起犯罪简单相加、把人多人少当作定性依据，都是常见的认识误区。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第627号张更生等故意杀人、敲诈勒索、组织卖淫案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，张更生担任村干部期间，以村委会名义组织人员向驻村单位送匾、闹社火、收取费用，还涉及敲诈勒索、组织卖淫和非法拘禁等犯罪。检察机关指控张更生等15人构成组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，法院没有因\"村委会多人参与＋存在多起犯罪\"就认定涉黑，而是分别评价村委会活动和个人犯罪。该案的核心判断可以概括为：\"张更生等15人不符合黑社会性质组织应同时具备的四个特征，以张更生为首的中社村村委不是黑社会性质组织。\"这说明，一个单位中有人犯罪，与该单位整体已经异化为黑社会性质组织，是两个不同问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第1160号牛子贤等绑架、敲诈勒索、开设赌场、重婚案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，一、二审认定牛子贤纠集多人开设赌场，并实施绑架、敲诈勒索等犯罪，构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪；最高人民法院复核后确认相关个罪，但认为涉黑认定不能成立，明确指出：\"对于指控证据尚未达到确实、充分的程度，不符合黑社会性质组织认定标准的……不能勉强认定为黑社会性质组织犯罪。\"该案中，人员之间缺乏稳定层级和固定职责，赌场收益主要按合伙比例分配，犯罪次数有限，也没有充分证据证明形成非法控制或者重大影响，因此被发回重审。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>何秉松教授在《黑社会犯罪解读》《有组织犯罪研究》中对有组织犯罪的分析，重点也落在组织化、经济支撑和社会控制之间是否形成稳定联系，而不只是统计人数和犯罪次数。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属应重点整理公司的真实业务、正常客户、纳税记录、员工劳动合同、业务决策流程及收入构成。合法经营占多大比例、普通员工能接触哪些事务、违法行为是个人行为还是公司统一安排，这些都会影响组织性质的判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、家人只是给老板开车、跑腿、领工资，没有加入仪式，也会被认定为组织成员吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>是否构成\"参加\"，不看是否有加入仪式，要看行为人是否实质接受组织领导和管理、参与组织事务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>没有入会仪式，不能当然排除\"参加\"；但只有劳动关系，也不能当然认定\"参加\"。\"参加\"的核心，是行为人已经超出普通劳动关系，明知这个群体主要依靠违法犯罪活动谋取利益，仍相对稳定地接受领导和安排，通过违法犯罪、人员联络、资金支持、看场护场或者逃避打击等行为参与组织运行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>司机、保安、会计和行政人员即使长期接触老板，首先仍应按照真实岗位职责评价，不能把工作关系直接改写成组织隶属关系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第618号陈金豹等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>提供了更具体的判断样本：刘应平曾为陈金豹的赌场介绍人员，又为一起故意杀人案件联系打手；王清华等人则临时接受邀约参与该起犯罪。公诉机关指控他们参加黑社会性质组织，一、二审均未认定。案例明确指出：\"参加黑社会性质组织，是指成为黑社会性质组织的一员，接受黑社会性质组织领导和管理的行为。\"\"对于主观上并无加入意图，客观上也不受犯罪组织领导和管理，因被纠集、雇佣、收买、威逼或者受蒙蔽而提供帮助、支持、服务的人员，不应以参加黑社会性质组织罪定罪处罚。\"\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>该案还明确，是否履行手续、取得会籍或者举行仪式，不是决定标准；真正重要的是双方是否就加入形成意思一致，行为人是否已经在组织领导、管理下实际参加组织活动。这正是区分普通司机、临时帮忙人员与组织成员的关键。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第1152号陈垚东等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>进一步说明：实践中的黑社会性质组织通常不会举行正式的加入仪式，判断成员身份要回到行为人是否接受组织领导、是否了解组织主要活动、是否相对稳定地参与组织事务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属应协助律师，把家人的工作内容拆成四类，逐项落地：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，正常接送、采购、报销和事务性跑腿；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，明知他人准备打人、拘禁或者威胁，仍负责接送、望风和联络；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，帮助统一口径、转移车辆、销毁记录或者安排人员躲避；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其四，参与分配违法所得，或者领取明显超出正常劳动对价的报酬。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一类主要是劳动关系，后三类则可能具有组织参与或共同犯罪意义。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>家属不能只对律师说\"他就是司机\"，还要把司机工作的边界还原出来：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>谁发工资，工资多少，工作群里有哪些内容，平时能否接触公司账目，接送时是否知道目的地和任务，是否分过额外收益。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>岗位名称不是结论，实际承担的任务才是责任判断的基础。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、办案人员说\"跟了老板这么久，不可能不知道\"，这能证明他主观上明知吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\"跟随时间长\"只是一条判断线索，不能单独支撑主观明知的认定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这里的\"明知\"，不是要求家人懂得\"黑社会性质组织\"这个法律名词，而是要证明他知道或者应当知道，自己参与的是一个具有一定规模和层级、主要从事违法犯罪活动的群体。所以，\"我不知道这叫黑社会\"不是完整辩解；但\"他跟了老板很多年\"同样不是完整指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>判断明知，应当逐项查看：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，是否多次参与暴力催收、看场护场等明显异常活动；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，是否接受过避开监控、使用他人电话或销毁记录的指令；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，是否参加组织内部处理违法事务的会议；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其四，是否知道有人受伤、被拘禁或被索取财物；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其五，是否获得与正常岗位不相称的分红和奖励；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其六，是否参与事后赔偿、安抚、串联口径或逃避侦查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>反过来，如果家人只接触公司正常业务，违法活动由少数人秘密安排；其工资、考勤和工作内容均符合普通劳动关系；没有参与组织会议，也没有分取违法利益，这些都是判断其认知范围的重要反证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第621号李军等参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，张成义原有成员被捕或在逃后，通过李光辉吸纳李军，李军又网罗孙军等人组成\"新班子\"。张成义采用\"一案一酬\"的方式，通过李军管理、指挥其他成员实施枪杀等犯罪。李军辩称双方只是雇佣关系，部分人员也主张不知道组织性质。该案对主观明知的裁判观点是：\"认定行为人构成参加黑社会性质组织罪，不以明确知道组织的黑社会性质为前提\"，但行为人必须\"知道或者应当知道自己所参与的是具有一定规模的组织\"。法院最终结合李军接受指挥、管理，继续网罗人员，积极参与严重犯罪并领取报酬等事实，认定其具有参加故意；与此同时，对不认识组织者、仅参与单起犯罪或只存在枪支交易、缺乏加入意图的人员，没有认定参加黑社会性质组织罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张明楷《刑法学》关于故意犯罪的分析也强调，主观认识可以由客观事实推断，但推断必须以行为人实际接触的信息为基础。因此，不能把老板知道的事、核心成员知道的事，自动算作司机、会计和普通员工都知道。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属应当整理：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，家人工作期间的工资构成、考勤记录、工作任务清单、通讯往来和微信工作群内容；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，家人究竟参与过哪些具体事务、是否接触过违法犯罪的决策会议、是否领取过分红或明显异常的奖金。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>凡是能反映家人实际认知范围的记录，都应当系统整理、固定并提交律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、家人只陪着催过两三次账，为什么会被认定为\"积极参加者\"？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\"积极参加\"的认定，要看职责、贡献和收益，而不是单纯地数次数。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>刑法对组织者、领导者、积极参加者和其他参加者设置了不同的法定刑，责任层级一旦认定错误，可能直接造成数年的刑期差异。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>因此，不能因为家人长期跟随老板、参加过几次行动，就直接把他列为积极参加者。层级判断主要看三个方面：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，是否在组织中承担相对固定、重要的职责；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，是否多次参与组织的重要违法犯罪活动；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，是否对组织运行、成员管理、资金调度或者势力扩张发挥明显作用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>骨干成员属于积极参加者的一部分，但不是对所有积极参加者的统称，更不能只因某人经常跟随老板就认定。一个人参与次数不多，但负责管理资金、调配人员或者安排善后，仍可能被认定为积极参加者；一个人虽然多次开车到场，如果每次只是服从临时安排，对犯罪计划不知情，也未参与决策和分利，则不能只按次数认定其为骨干或者积极参加者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第621号李军案\u003C\u002Fstrong>同时给出了积极参加者的判断方法：\"应从行为人实施具体犯罪的客观方面，行为人在组织中的地位、作用及其与组织、领导者之间的关系，以及所获取的犯罪所得三个方面\"综合判断。该案中的陈忠桥参与两起枪杀，在其中一起负责牵头、现场指挥并直接实施杀人，长期充当组织者的\"左膀右臂\"，还获得工资、奖金和房产奖励，因而被认定为积极参加者和骨干成员。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第1153号朱光辉等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，朱光辉长期控制客运站线路，并将保护费收取、餐具和啤酒供应控制、后勤保障等事务交由不同成员负责。案例明确指出：\"骨干成员，是指直接听命于组织者、领导者，并多次指挥或积极参与实施有组织的违法犯罪活动，或者其他长时间在犯罪组织中起重要作用的犯罪分子，属于积极参加者的一部分。\"所以，骨干成员不是对所有积极参加者的统称，更不能只因某人经常跟随老板就认定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属应要求律师制作两张表：一张是组织层级和职责表，一张是本人逐次参与事实表。把\"长期跟随\"\"老板信任\"\"经常出现\"这些评价性语言，拆成具体的时间、任务、权限、收益和结果，责任层级才有可能被准确判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、对方确实欠公司钱，家人只是陪老板催债，为什么会涉嫌敲诈勒索或者寻衅滋事？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>真实债权不等于合法催收，违法催收手段不会因为有真实债务就自动合法化。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这类案件首先要把三件事分开：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，债权是否真实；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，索取金额是否有权利基础；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，催收手段是否违法。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果确有借款、货款或者工程款，索取的也是本金和有依据的损失，通常不能仅因言语强硬就认定敲诈勒索。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>但如果借真实债权之名，索取明显超过债权范围的\"违约金\"\"管理费\"\"出场费\"，或者通过伤害本人、威胁家属、限制自由等方式迫使对方交付财物，仍可能进入敲诈勒索、非法拘禁等犯罪的审查范围。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>滋扰、纠缠和\"软暴力\"不是可以包办全部定性的口袋概念。应当判断相关行为是否使被害人形成现实恐惧，是否足以压制其正常意思决定，以及是否已经形成有组织的威慑效应。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第1157号符青友等敲诈勒索、强迫交易案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，符青友等人依托公司和劳务组，在工程承揽、劳务和材料供应中实施阻工、滋扰等行为，一审曾作涉黑评价。但相关行为大多没有直接使用暴力或者以暴力相威胁，更多是让开发商、承建商\"不胜其烦\"。案例指出：\"在黑社会性质组织所实施的违法犯罪活动中，一般应有一部分能够较明显地体现出暴力或以暴力相威胁的基本特征。否则，定性时应当特别慎重。\"据此，不能只看到多人阻工、反复纠缠，就跳过暴力性、组织性和控制力的实质审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安成功案例库印证\u003C\u002Fstrong>：卓安律师团队办理的江苏某环保公司涉嫌涉恶、串通投标案，争议同样发生在企业经营和项目承揽过程中。律师团队围绕项目技术原因、投标与履约背景、人员行为及涉恶定性开展工作，案件历经两年审查，最终撤案。该案说明，工程、交易和催收场景中的行为，必须先查清真实业务基础，不能因为多人参与或者发生冲突就直接认定为涉恶犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属应尽快保存合同、借条、对账单、转账记录、交付凭证及完整聊天记录。真实债权、索取数额和催收行为应当分别证明，不能让一句\"替老板催账\"同时替代三个法律问题。凡是与催收相关的微信记录、通话录音、行车轨迹，都应当完整保留。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>六、组织里其他人打人、敲诈，家人没有动手，这些罪也会全部算到他头上吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>成员身份不等于对组织内全部犯罪承担责任，组织犯罪与成员个人犯罪必须分开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>具体犯罪能否归入组织责任，应当逐项审查：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，是否由组织者、领导者组织、策划、指挥或者参与；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，是否为了组织利益；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，是否以组织名义实施；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其四，组织者、领导者是否事后认可并利用其结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>即便某人是骨干成员，他私下因个人恩怨实施的犯罪，也不当然属于组织犯罪；反过来，即便家人没有直接动手，如果事前知道具体犯罪安排，仍负责把人叫到现场、提供车辆、望风、看守、收款或者转移工具，也可能按共同犯罪承担责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第624号区瑞狮等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，区瑞狮组织长期通过赌博、追债、收取保护费等活动牟利，并实施故意伤害、抢劫等犯罪。但组织骨干谢玉霞伙同李伟军因交通事故赔偿引发的聚众斗殴，被单独列为\"在黑社会性质组织意志之外\"实施的犯罪。案例据此提出，判断某起犯罪是否属于组织犯罪，要看\"是否由组织者、领导者直接组织、策划、指挥、参与实施\"，是否为了组织利益、以组织名义实施，以及组织者、领导者是否认可或利用其结果。成员因个人矛盾实施的犯罪，不因其成员身份自动变成组织犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>作为对照，\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第1158号刘汉等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，汉龙集团保安唐先兵因工程冲突杀害熊伟。最高人民法院认定该犯罪属于组织犯罪，是因为唐先兵系骨干成员，犯罪发生于公司工程利益冲突，事后公司安排其躲藏、继续发放工资并予以调岗，体现了犯罪服务于组织利益且受到组织庇护。裁判结论明确写道：\"故意杀害熊伟的犯罪系黑社会性质组织的骨干成员唐先兵为维护组织利益而实施。\"两案对照可以看出，关键不在\"谁动的手\"，而在犯罪是否进入组织意志和组织利益的范围。这套逐人、逐事、逐罪的分析方法，也符合陈兴良《共同犯罪论》所强调的责任个别化要求。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安成功案例库印证\u003C\u002Fstrong>：卓安律师团队办理的民警Z某涉嫌涉恶三罪案，辩护团队集中论证该民警未参与\"软暴力\"安排、未实际实施威胁行为、未分享相关违法所得，最终排除恶势力认定，依法判处有期徒刑三年。该案直接说明：组织内其他成员的行为不能直接转嫁到本人，本人在具体犯罪中的地位、作用与责任，必须以证据为根据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属应当逐项列出家人本人参与或者明知帮助的具体行为，把每一项行为落到具体时间、地点、对象、方式、后果上。任何没有参与、没有明知、没有帮助的行为，都不应被\"组织成员\"四个字概括承担。同时应当保留家人本人未参与相应犯罪的客观证据，如当时的工作安排、所在位置、不在场证明等。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>七、几名同案人都说家人是组织成员，口供也差不多，这样就能定罪吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>口供数量多，不等于证明力自然叠加；说法一致，也要先查清是不是独立形成。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉黑案件通常人数多、时间长，言词证据在证明组织架构和内部活动时占有较大比重，但组织特征、经济特征、行为特征和危害性特征，仍必须达到事实清楚、证据确实充分的程度，不能因为案件被贴上\"涉黑\"标签就降低证明标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>几名同案人供述一致，至少要继续追问：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，他们是否在讯问前相互接触；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，口供是否出现异常一致的法律化表述；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，是否存在立功、从轻或转嫁责任的利益；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其四，讯问录音录像与笔录是否一致；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其五，关键事实有没有资金、通讯、监控和现场证据印证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>组织层面的证据不能自动证明家人的成员身份，别人的具体犯罪也不能证明家人参与。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉黑案件需要建立\"两层证据链\"：一层证明组织是否成立，另一层证明本人是否加入、处于什么地位、参与了什么行为，两层都不能缺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第628号乔永生等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，公诉机关围绕组织的成员和结构、收入来源和资金流转、有组织实施的违法犯罪以及对建筑行业形成的影响分别举证。案件材料显示，该组织有16名成员、8名固定骨干，自1999年持续活动，有专人负责账目、合同和人员安排，又通过强揽工程获取利益、发展成员和购买工具，在当地建筑行业形成重大影响。该案的核心观点是：\"黑社会性质组织犯罪属于复合型犯罪……应当将那些具有双重证明功能的证据纳入黑社会性质组织犯罪的证明链条中，围绕黑社会性质组织犯罪构筑单独的证据体系。\"它还强调，\"事实清楚、证据确实充分\"是指影响定罪量刑的事实必须清楚、据以定罪量刑的证据必须确实充分。由此可见，几份相似口供只能是证据体系的一部分，还必须与账目、合同、资金、通讯和被害人陈述形成完整印证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>陈瑞华《刑事证据法》所强调的证据分析方法，是分别审查证据的来源、形成过程、真实性、证明对象及相互印证关系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安成功案例库印证\u003C\u002Fstrong>：卓安律师团队办理的刘某涉嫌诈骗、涉恶案，辩护团队逐项核查在案证据，复核各同案人供述的形成过程与相互印证关系，最终由检察机关撤销诈骗罪指控，亦未再认定恶势力。该案充分说明：在言词证据占比较高的涉黑案件中，对同案人供述的独立性审查和证据链补强，是辩护的核心突破口。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属应当重视讯问录音录像与笔录的核对工作，并整理家人工作与生活的相关客观证据：行车轨迹、转账流水、通讯记录、考勤打卡、工作任务单。这些客观证据，往往是检验言词证据可靠性的关键。一旦发现讯问过程存在违规，或者供述内容与客观证据存在明显矛盾，应当及时向律师反映。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>八、公司赚了很多钱，是不是就能证明这个组织具有\"经济特征\"？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>有钱不等于具备经济特征，关键是财产如何取得、由谁控制、是否用于维系组织。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>判断经济特征，不能只看公司营业额、老板资产和项目规模，还要审查违法所得、合法经营收入与组织活动之间的真实联系。一家企业即使营业额很高，如果收入主要来自正常经营，财务按公司制度使用，普通员工领取正常工资，不能简单把全部收入认定为黑社会性质组织的经济基础。反过来，即使金额没有达到特别巨大，只要相关资金长期被用于豢养成员、支付行动费用、购买工具、赔偿善后、拉拢关系或者支持组织扩张，也可能具有维系组织的功能。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第625号王平等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，组织者利用村干部身份，通过罚款、侵占财政拨款、低价强购林木并控制林木产销等方式聚敛利益，还虚报注册资本设立公司，将部分利益用于奖励成员、购买住房和发展经济实体。案件并未把\"资产多\"本身作为经济特征，而是追查利益取得和使用方式。该案的核心观点是：\"没有明确的数额标准并不等于没有要求\"，应结合地区、行业情况判断经济利益是否足以支持组织生存、发展和实施违法犯罪；同时，\"只要将所获经济利益部分用于组织或者组织犯罪即可，并不要求将获利的全部或绝大部分用于'犯罪再生产'。\"\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这与何秉松《黑社会犯罪解读》的分析相互印证：经济实力的意义不只在拥有多少钱，更在于它是否为组织的长期存在和扩张提供物质支撑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属应要求把钱分成至少四类：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，公司正常经营收入；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，具体违法犯罪所得；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，组织成员个人合法收入；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其四，被用于违法犯罪和组织活动的资金。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果侦查报告把公司全部营业收入直接列为组织经济基础，或者把老板个人财产、公司财产和违法所得混为一体，就需要依据合同、账簿、纳税材料和资金用途重新核算。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>九、家里的房子、公司账户和配偶名下的钱都被冻结，是不是一旦认定涉黑，就都会被没收？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>侦查阶段的冻结只是临时控制，最终追缴、没收仍须区分财产性质。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉黑案件中常见四种财产处理：查封、扣押、冻结；追缴违法所得；没收供犯罪使用的本人财物；判处没收财产。它们的条件和范围不同，不能用\"涉案财产\"四个字全部包住。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《反有组织犯罪法》以及《关于办理黑恶势力刑事案件中财产处置若干问题的意见》强调依法追查涉案财产，同时也要求保护利害关系人和案外人的合法权益。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>最终处理时，应当查明财产取得时间、资金来源、实际控制人和具体用途。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>配偶名下的财产不能因为婚姻关系就当然成为\"黑财\"；公司账户也不能因为实际控制人涉案就当然全部没收。应区分：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，违法犯罪所得及收益；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，用于组织活动或者供犯罪使用的财产；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，被告人的合法个人财产；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其四，配偶、股东、债权人等案外人的合法财产；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其五，合法与非法资金发生混同的财产。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《反有组织犯罪法》《关于办理黑恶势力刑事案件中财产处置若干问题的意见》以及《刑事审判参考》\u003Cstrong>第625号王平案\u003C\u002Fstrong>，共同确立了\"区分合法与违法财产、区分个人与组织财产、区分被告人与案外人财产\"的基本原则：判断重点始终落在财产如何取得、由谁控制、用于何处，而不是简单的数额大小。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安办案方法\u003C\u002Fstrong>：四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会在办理此类案件时，会把人员关系、公司股权、账户流转和财产来源放在同一张审查图中，逐项区分违法所得、组织财产、个人合法财产和案外人财产，确保每一笔被处置的财产都有充分证据支撑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属提出异议时，不能只说\"这是我们家的钱\"，应当形成一条可以核验的来源链：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，购房款由谁支付；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，工资和经营收入来自哪里；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，财产何时取得；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其四，股权怎样形成；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其五，借款是否真实；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其六，是否缴纳税费。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>同时应当及时向律师提交财产异议申请书，请求解除对合法财产的不当控制。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>十、检察院让家人签认罪认罚，说签了可以轻判；他一签，是不是就等于承认整个组织和所有罪名？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心判断】\u003C\u002Fstrong>认罪认罚可以带来从宽，但不能用一份具结书代替对组织性质、成员身份和具体犯罪的证明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【法律要件与责任边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉黑案件往往同时涉及组织罪名、多个具体犯罪、成员层级、涉案金额和财产处理。签署前必须逐项确认：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，是否承认黑社会性质组织成立；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，是否承认本人属于组织成员；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，属于积极参加还是其他参加；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其四，承认参与哪些具体犯罪；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其五，不认可哪些事实和金额；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其六，数罪并罚后的量刑建议是多少；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其七，罚金、追缴和没收财产如何处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果家人只承认陪同催收，认可其中一次寻衅滋事，却不认可自己加入黑社会性质组织，就不能用一句\"总体认罪\"抹去争议。检察机关仍须证明\"四个特征\"、本人明知和参加行为。组织责任、成员责任和具体犯罪责任必须分别审查，认罪认罚也不能改变这种结构。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例与专业书籍论据】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第626号张宝义等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fstrong>中，该组织依托托运站等经济实体发展，内部有人负责经营管理，有人看护场地，有人担任保镖或者打手。审判中并未把所有涉案人员作同一评价：张宝义等被认定为组织者、领导者，殷岩等被认定为积极参加者，李卿属于一般参加者；而受雇实施杀人犯罪的李以果、杜景龙虽然构成具体犯罪，却没有被认定为组织成员。最高人民法院明确评价：\"李以果并非黑社会性质组织成员，系受雇佣和指使而实施犯罪。\"该案说明，受雇实施个罪与加入组织是两项不同判断，不能因为承认某起个罪，就当然等于承认参加黑社会性质组织。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>刑事审判参考案例第624号区瑞狮案、第1158号刘汉案\u003C\u002Fstrong>所体现的共同裁判方法，同样是把组织责任、成员责任和具体犯罪责任分别审查，认罪认罚也不能改变这种结构。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安成功案例库印证\u003C\u002Fstrong>：卓安律师团队办理的刘某涉嫌诈骗、涉恶案，律师围绕诈骗事实、证据链和恶势力认定分别开展辩护，检察机关最终撤销诈骗罪指控，同时未再认定恶势力。该案表明，个罪是否成立与恶势力是否成立是两个不同层次的问题，不能因为案件一度被整体评价为涉恶，就要求当事人笼统承认全部指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【家属应当核实、保存和整理的具体材料】\u003C\u002Fstrong>家属不要只问\"签了能少几年\"，更重要的是让律师把认可事实、争议事实、成员层级、并罚结果和财产处理逐项核对。真正稳妥的认罪认罚，是在看清证据和法律后作出的选择，不是在信息不完整时用放弃争议换取一个模糊承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>主要参考案例与专业资料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>《刑事审判参考》案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>第618号：陈金豹等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第621号：李军等参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第624号：区瑞狮等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第625号：王平等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第626号：张宝义等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第627号：张更生等故意杀人、敲诈勒索、组织卖淫案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第628号：乔永生等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第1152号：陈垚东等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第1153号：朱光辉等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第1157号：符青友等敲诈勒索、强迫交易案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第1158号：刘汉等组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>第1160号：牛子贤等绑架、敲诈勒索、开设赌场、重婚案\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>法律及司法文件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十四条\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件若干问题的指导意见》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《全国部分法院审理黑社会性质组织犯罪案件工作座谈会纪要》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《关于办理实施\"软暴力\"的刑事案件若干问题的意见》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>《关于办理黑恶势力刑事案件中财产处置若干问题的意见》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>专业书籍\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>何秉松：《黑社会犯罪解读》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>何秉松：《有组织犯罪研究》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>张明楷：《刑法学》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>陈兴良：《共同犯罪论》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>陈瑞华：《刑事证据法》\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安成功案例库\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>卓安律师团队办理的刘某涉嫌诈骗、涉恶案：检察机关撤销诈骗罪指控，同时未再认定恶势力；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>卓安律师团队办理的江苏某环保公司涉嫌涉恶、串通投标案：案件历经两年审查，最终撤案；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>卓安律师团队办理的民警Z某涉嫌涉恶三罪案：经辩护排除恶势力认定，最终判处有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>附：卓安在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累与委员会情况\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>作为全国第三家只做刑事的律所，卓安成立以来专注刑事辩护与风险防控，累计办理各类刑事案件超 8000 起，其中涉黑涉恶犯罪案件 200 余件，涵盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、聚众斗殴、敲诈勒索、强迫交易、非法拘禁、开设赌场等关联罪名。涉案人员覆盖组织领导者到普通参与者各层级，已取得不认定黑、不认定恶、不起诉、撤案、改判轻刑、涉案财产解封等辩护效果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>专业出版：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安累计出版法学专著 65 部、发表学术论文 203 篇，围绕公检法运行机制、律师辩护、办案程序与犯罪类型开展专项研究。涉黑涉恶方向编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，发表黑社会性质组织与恶势力犯罪认定研究论文，形成扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成课程体系，包括《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师获得各类荣誉表彰 100 余项，多名律师受聘为西北政法大学刑事法律科学研究中心、西南政法大学刑事辩护研究中心、华东政法大学律师学院等高校特邀研究员，并为四川省公安厅、成都市政法委、成都市政府、成都市中级人民法院等 30 余家公检法、律协顾问单位提供咨询顾问服务。艾述洪律师于 2025 年荣任成都律协刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会：\u003C\u002Fstrong>四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会，是卓安在涉黑涉恶方向设立的专业办案与研究机构，由具有原公检法扫黑办案背景的律师、刑事诉讼法学专家与涉黑案件证据专家组成，定位为涉黑涉恶案件的定性纠错与轻刑辩护专业力量。主要职能包括：围绕黑社会性质组织“四个特征”与恶势力认定标准逐项审查证据，排除拔高认定；把当事人从被指控的犯罪组织中剥离，区分组织者、领导者、积极参加者与一般参加者；全面审查“四个特征”证据体系并依法申请非法证据排除；甄别合法财产与涉案财产，为案外人财产、配偶财产和家庭共同财产提出异议；在侦查、审查起诉、审判各阶段提交不认定黑恶的法律意见；编写办案实务手册与培训课程，输出扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>说明：本资料由四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会出品，面向涉黑涉恶案件中被指控人员的近亲属。《刑事审判参考》案例、最高人民法院指导案例与卓安成功案例用于说明裁判方法与审查思路，个案仍应结合起诉指控、卷宗证据、行为时间及现行法律进行分析。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1790069247069.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安总部地址：四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-22 17:47:28",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"家人只是给老板开车、跑腿，还陪着催过几次账，为什么会被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","公司型涉黑案件中，普通员工家属最需要问清楚的十个问题 四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会出品 场景说明 家人在一家经营多年的公司工作，平时负责开车、接送、跑腿，偶尔陪老板处理纠纷、催收欠款。后来老板和多名员工被一并抓获，公安机关认为该公司长期通过暴力、威胁或其他手段承揽工程、催收债务、排挤竞争者，涉嫌形成黑社会性质组","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F615",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,648],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":628},"Article","2026-09-22T17:47:28+08:00","2026-09-22T17:47:41+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},{"@type":649,"itemListElement":650},"BreadcrumbList",[651,654,656],{"@type":652,"position":6,"name":653,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":652,"position":38,"name":633,"item":655},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":652,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]