[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-600":622},{"entity":4,"seo":574},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":176,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":238,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":309,"serviceTags":310,"serviceCategories":534,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":551,"homeStats":552,"serviceProducts":564},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,164,168,172],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},323,"D某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，团队律师为作罪轻辩护","一、案情简介 杜某因涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，于2016年11月14日被公安机关刑事拘留，2017年8月24日，法院开庭审理，并于同年10月25日作出宣判。 二、办案过程 2017年1月3日，律师接受委托，多次前往成都市看守所会见，并前往检","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},322,"W某职务侵占，团队律师为作罪轻辩护","一、案情简介 魏某因涉嫌职务侵占罪，被成都市武侯区人民检察院提起公诉，成都市武侯区人民法院依法适用普通程序进行审理。 二、办案过程 2017年3月6日，管宇律师接受委托。多次前往成都市看守所会见，并前往检察机关阅卷，与被害人进行和解，签订谅",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},321,"L某、H某涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2016年9月，被告人何某某、黎某某在明知违法的情况下，为获取非法利益驾驶轿车使用“伪基站”在泸州市区冒充银行向不特定收集用户发送诈骗短信共计6750条，二被告人在发诈骗信息过程中被泸县公安局民警在泸州市当场抓获。 二、办案过",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},320,"Y某涉嫌虚开发票罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人叶某某得知某供应站将招标xx注射液的信息后，与北京某公司法人张某联系，并达成代理其研发的xx注射液销售协议。由叶某某控股的北京某公司及其关联的北京某某公司均无经营药品的资格。2009年初，叶某某联系到四川某光公司、某汇公",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},319,"共谋抢劫数额巨大，团队律师为其辩护，主犯T某获从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人T某，男，XXXX年XX月生，无业，S省某县人。因涉嫌抢劫罪，2010年6月29日被成都市公安局武侯区分局刑事拘留，同年7月27日经成都市检察院武侯区分院批准，次日由成都市公安局武侯区分局执行逮捕。 检方查明，2010年",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},318,"L某盗窃手机二十余部，团队律师为其辩护，认定情节减轻","一、案情简介 被告人L某盗窃手机，被控盗窃罪。 2011年4月，被告人L某经事前踩点，携带绳子、改刀等作案工具来到C市某区某营业厅大楼后面，趁该营业厅下班后无人之机，利用作案工具潜入营业厅，盗走人民币28915元，不含配件手机23部，以及手",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},317,"被告人Z某涉嫌受贿、挪用公款二罪，团队律师成功辩护一罪不成立，一罪轻判","一、案情简介 Z某，任某市某开发事业中心副主任兼该市某投资公司副总经理。2006年2月5日，因涉嫌受贿罪和挪用公款罪被成都市公安局刑事拘留；同年2月8日被批准逮捕。 指控的主要事实有： （1）1999年9月，Z某在任该市某计划处科员期间，某",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},316,"某天然气公司总经理Y某受贿达30万元，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2007年1月29日，内江市东兴区检察院对内江市某天然气公司总经理Y某提起公诉，指控称：1995年11月起至案发，被告人Y某先后担任内江市某天然气公司安装公司副经理、经理职务。1998年至2006年5月间，承揽该公司天然气安装",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},315,"X某涉嫌巨额财产来源不明罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻刑","一、案情简介 被告人徐某，系中国XX银行四川省D市市分行党组书记、行长。曾系F市市分行副行长、行长。2006年1月23日因涉嫌犯违法发放贷款罪被四川省公安厅刑事拘留，同年2月23日被逮捕，并由中纪委督办该案。四川省资阳市检察院对徐某等三人提",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},314,"Y某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其成功轻罪辩护","一、抢劫罪及盗窃罪之源头 我的当事人袁某跟很多怀抱梦想的年轻人一样，从四川省的一个小县城来到成都，想实现自己的理想，然而世事多变却让他走上了犯罪的道路。2009年9月26日，袁某与同伙李某共谋在成都某大学门口附近，采用手持石块、语言威胁的方",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},313,"七次共谋参与抢劫达50余万元，团队律师成功为L某辩护，获从轻处罚","一、案情简介 L某、Y某以非法占有为目的，七次共谋采用持刀威胁、实施暴力的方法抢劫出租车，被抢现金及手机等共计价值11000余元，被抢出租车共计价值50余万元 L某、Y某长期在网吧上网，没有经济来源，遂产生抢劫他人财物的念头。2011年7月",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},312,"W某从网友家盗走9800元，控方建议判处有期徒刑二年半，团队律师一番激辩，法庭当庭宣判有期徒刑一年","一、案情简介 2012年11月某日，被告人W某到网友L某的租住房内玩耍，后L某有事外出，W某临时起意，趁机将L某放在家中提包内的现金9800元秘密拿走后逃离。2012年11月28日，W某在Z市被民警挡获，赃款被追回并发还被害人。检方指控，W",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":10,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},311,"L某涉嫌滥用职权罪、受贿罪，团队律师为其滥用职权罪做无罪辩护，对受贿罪做罪轻辩护","一、案情简介 （一）2012年，被告人芦某在担任S省XX委员会XX推进处（以下简称省经信委推进处）处长期间，违反S省省级战略性新兴产业发展促进资金（以下简称发展资金）评审规定，帮助不符合评审条件的成都某电子有限责任公司（以下简称甲公司）获取",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":10,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},310,"H某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，从第一被告变更为第三被告，获从轻处罚","一、案情简介 H某因与同伙成立“某算力”平台，在经营过程中以为需求客户提供算力为噱头，并以投资虚拟币即有高额回报为诱饵，引诱参加者继续发展他人参加，分级与下线人数较多，具有传销性质。公诉机关指控H某犯组织、领导传销活动罪，涉案金额400万余",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":10,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},309,"X某涉嫌妨害信用卡管理罪、帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 向某因涉嫌妨害信用卡管理罪，2019年6月13日被成都市公安局天府新区分局刑事拘留，同年7月19日，经成都市公安局天府新区分局决定取保候审；因涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，于2020年6月10日被利川市公安局刑事拘留，同年7月2",[177,182,187,192,195,200,205,211,217],{"id":6,"code":178,"name":179,"summary":180,"keywords":181},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":183,"name":184,"summary":185,"keywords":186},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":188,"name":189,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":193,"keywords":194},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":196,"name":197,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":206,"code":207,"name":208,"summary":209,"keywords":210},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":218,"city":227,"caseType":228,"title":229,"thumbnail":230,"content":10,"publishTime":231,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":232,"lawyers":233,"lawyer":237},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[234],{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[239,242,256,272,291],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":218,"city":227,"caseType":228,"title":229,"thumbnail":230,"content":10,"publishTime":231,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":232,"lawyers":240},[241],{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":243,"createdAt":244,"updatedAt":244,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":212,"city":258,"caseType":259,"title":260,"thumbnail":261,"content":10,"publishTime":262,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":263,"lawyers":264},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[265,268],{"id":212,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":266,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":269,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":270,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":271,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":273,"createdAt":274,"updatedAt":274,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":275,"city":276,"caseType":277,"title":278,"thumbnail":279,"content":10,"publishTime":280,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":281,"lawyers":282},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[283,286],{"id":275,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":284,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":285,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":287,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":289,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":290,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":292,"createdAt":274,"updatedAt":274,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":293,"city":294,"caseType":295,"title":296,"thumbnail":297,"content":10,"publishTime":298,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":299,"lawyers":300},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[301,306],{"id":302,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":303,"position":304,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":305,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":293,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":307,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":308,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[311,320,326,333,340,347,354,360,366,375,382,389,396,403,410,419,426,433,440,446,452,457,463,469,475,481,487,496,503,510,516,522,528],{"id":312,"createdAt":313,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":317,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":302,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":322,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":323,"name":324,"summary":325,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":327,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":332,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":334,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":339,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":341,"createdAt":342,"updatedAt":343,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":344,"name":345,"summary":346,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":348,"createdAt":349,"updatedAt":350,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":351,"name":352,"summary":353,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":355,"updatedAt":356,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":357,"name":358,"summary":359,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":361,"createdAt":362,"updatedAt":362,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":363,"name":364,"summary":365,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":367,"createdAt":368,"updatedAt":369,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":370,"name":371,"summary":372,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":376,"createdAt":377,"updatedAt":378,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":379,"name":380,"summary":381,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":383,"createdAt":384,"updatedAt":385,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":386,"name":387,"summary":388,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":390,"createdAt":391,"updatedAt":392,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":393,"name":394,"summary":395,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":397,"createdAt":398,"updatedAt":399,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":400,"name":401,"summary":402,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":404,"createdAt":405,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":407,"name":408,"summary":409,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":411,"createdAt":412,"updatedAt":413,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":414,"name":415,"summary":416,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":420,"createdAt":421,"updatedAt":422,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":423,"name":424,"summary":425,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":427,"createdAt":428,"updatedAt":429,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":430,"name":431,"summary":432,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":434,"createdAt":435,"updatedAt":436,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":437,"name":438,"summary":439,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":441,"createdAt":442,"updatedAt":442,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":443,"name":444,"summary":445,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":447,"createdAt":448,"updatedAt":448,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":449,"name":450,"summary":451,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":245,"createdAt":453,"updatedAt":453,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":454,"name":455,"summary":456,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":458,"createdAt":459,"updatedAt":459,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":460,"name":461,"summary":462,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":464,"createdAt":465,"updatedAt":465,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":466,"name":467,"summary":468,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":470,"createdAt":471,"updatedAt":471,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":472,"name":473,"summary":474,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":476,"createdAt":477,"updatedAt":477,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":478,"name":479,"summary":480,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":482,"createdAt":483,"updatedAt":483,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":484,"name":485,"summary":486,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":488,"createdAt":489,"updatedAt":490,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":491,"name":492,"summary":493,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":497,"createdAt":498,"updatedAt":499,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":500,"name":501,"summary":502,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":504,"createdAt":505,"updatedAt":506,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":507,"name":508,"summary":509,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":511,"createdAt":512,"updatedAt":512,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":513,"name":514,"summary":515,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":517,"createdAt":518,"updatedAt":518,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":519,"name":520,"summary":521,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":523,"createdAt":524,"updatedAt":524,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":525,"name":526,"summary":527,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":529,"createdAt":530,"updatedAt":530,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":531,"name":532,"summary":533,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[535,539,543,547],{"id":40,"createdAt":536,"updatedAt":537,"deleted":31,"code":494,"name":495,"summary":538,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":540,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":541,"displayTags":10,"icon":542,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":544,"deleted":31,"code":373,"name":374,"summary":545,"displayTags":10,"icon":546,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":548,"deleted":31,"code":417,"name":418,"summary":549,"displayTags":10,"icon":550,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[553,556,559,562],{"value":554,"label":555},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":557,"label":558},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":560,"label":561},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":330,"label":563},"全国分所",[565,568,571],{"title":566,"desc":567},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":569,"desc":570},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":572,"desc":573},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":575,"description":13,"keywords":576,"canonical":577,"image":10,"jsonLd":578},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[579],{"@context":580,"@graph":581},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[582,588],{"@type":583,"@id":584,"url":577,"name":7,"inLanguage":585,"publisher":586},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":587},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":589,"@id":587,"name":7,"url":577,"logo":590,"image":590,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":585,"address":591,"geo":594,"department":596},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":593},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":595,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[597,602,606,610,614,618],{"@type":598,"@id":599,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":600,"parentOrganization":601},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":603,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":604,"parentOrganization":605},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":607,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":608,"parentOrganization":609},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":611,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":612,"parentOrganization":613},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":615,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":616,"parentOrganization":617},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":619,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":620,"parentOrganization":621},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":587},{"entity":623,"seo":634},{"id":624,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":625,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":626,"thumbnail":627,"content":628,"publishTime":629,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":630},600,"2026-09-21 21:00:24","家人在涉黑涉恶线索核查阶段被查，检察院会怎么看这些证据？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F21\u002F51d3c59b-7c4b-466b-b794-b2bd708e7578.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F21\u002Fbef0b22c-bbaf-494c-8e9b-72ce7474c81b.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\WIN10\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml27196\\wps54.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cstrong>前检察官讲线索核查的立案逻辑：四步证据审查顺序、三类不会立案的情形、四川家属现在该准备什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(136, 136, 136); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">四川涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属风险参考\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(136, 136, 136); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">发布时间：2026年9月18日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>摘要\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>争点：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">四川的家属最怕的不是已经立案，而是家人被举报\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">后那句“还在核查”——查什么、查到哪、会不会突然立案抓人，全都没有答案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>为什么这个争点决定结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">线索核查虽不是刑事立案，却是办案机关决定是否立案的唯一窗口，核查阶段对证据和定性的初步认定，会一路传导到后面的侦查、起诉、审判，标签一旦贴上就很难撕。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>规则怎么规定：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">检察机关在核查阶段看证据并非随意，而是沿主体与管辖、行为事实、四个特征、证据来源合法性这条固定顺序逐层审查，最终卡在《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百一十二条“有犯罪事实需要追究刑事责任”这道\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>立案门槛\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>律师的案子怎么印证：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">何冰冰律师做过市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人和反贪局侦查科科长，办过的案子反复证明，够不上四个特征的、只有情绪没有事实的、证据来源不合法的，到不了立案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结论：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">家属现在能做的只有三件事——保留原始材料、不统一说法、请有前检察官背景的律师做一次立案前评估，把民事纠纷和普通违法从涉黑涉恶定性里提前拆出来，这是整个案件里回旋余地最大的阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、何冰冰律师是谁\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">何冰冰律师现任四川卓安律师事务所主任，前市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长，从事法律工作十余年，参与办理各类刑事案件1000余件。她的独特之处，在于既做过侦查、又做过公诉，再回来做辩护，完整走过刑事案件的证据审查全流程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">前检察官最清楚的一件事，是\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>办案机关看证据有固定顺序和固定口径\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">。线索核查阶段，检察机关不会把举报材料一把抓，而是先看这个案子归不归自己管、被举报的人够不够得上犯罪主体，再看有没有具体行为事实，再看够不够得上黑社会性质组织的四个特征，最后看证据来源合不合法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>知道这个顺序，家属和律师才能知道哪些材料该提前准备、哪些定性该提前反驳。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt; text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\WIN10\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml27196\\wps55.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F21\u002F813acc78-31cc-41cb-98a6-d4a562aafb45.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、专业领域与代表性成果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">何冰冰律师的业务方向集中在职务犯罪、经济犯罪、毒品犯罪和重大刑事案件，在涉黑涉恶案件中主攻定性证据审查与责任边界拆分。她的代表性成果都能交叉验证：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>论文：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">在《中国人民公安大学学报》发表论文《警察使用枪支合法性研究》。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>授课：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">担任庭立方核心导师，主讲“认罪认罚案件辩护课”“鉴定意见质证”“刑事法律风控高级讲师班”三门课程，覆盖学员超千人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>学术职务：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">担任四川师范大学法律硕士专业学位研究生兼职指导教师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、代表性案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">以下案例均出自四川卓安律师事务所核准材料并作脱敏处理，标注真实办理阶段，具体结果以不起诉决定书、判决书、裁定书或公开法律文书为准，不构成对结果的承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案例一：Y某涉嫌对非国家工作人员行贿案，检察院作出不起诉决定（审查起诉阶段）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案件情况：Y某因商业往来被控对非国家工作人员行贿，涉案行为发生在正常业务合作背景中。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护策略：团队律师围绕行为是否符合该罪构成要件展开，对“为谋取不正当利益”“给予财物”等要件逐一核对，指出现有证据不能完整覆盖构罪要件的全部环节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">律师切入角度：定罪的前提是行为完全对得上构成要件，而不是看起来像。前检察官背景的价值，在于知道检察机关内部按什么口径卡构成要件、哪一要件最容易出现证据缺口。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">结果：检察机关采纳意见，对Y某作出不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案例二：钟某涉嫌非法买卖枪支案，检察机关撤诉（审判阶段）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案件情况：钟某被控非法买卖枪支，指控围绕涉案枪支的流向与交易环节展开。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护策略：团队律师围绕证据来源与定性问题展开，指出关键证据在来源、关联性上存在不能排除的疑点，指控事实的证明未能达到法定标准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">律师切入角度：证据审查的本质是来源合法、关联真实、证明充分三者缺一不可。前检察官知道哪些证据在公诉环节会被认定、哪些站不住脚，就能把质证意见写到真正能动摇指控的位置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">结果：检察机关在审判阶段撤诉。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案例三：唐某涉嫌合同诈骗案，成功打掉一个罪名（审判阶段）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案件情况：唐某被控合同诈骗等多项罪名，其中部分指控源于经济往来的性质认定争议。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护策略：团队律师对各项指控逐罪拆分，围绕非法占有目的的有无、合同履行情况、资金去向等展开，把民事违约与刑事诈骗严格区分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">律师切入角度：很多涉刑指控，本质是经济纠纷被拔高成了犯罪。把每一笔往来的性质而不是数额讲清楚，把未履约与以非法占有为目的实施欺骗分开，是这类辩护的突破口。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">结果：成功打掉其中一项罪名指控。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案例四：胡某涉嫌组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织等六罪案，责任边界逐罪拆分（二审阶段）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案件情况：胡某被控组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织等六项罪名，涉及组织层级与责任划分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护策略：卓安律师团队办理，成安律师领衔，何冰冰律师等共同参与，对六项罪名逐一区分责任层级与参与程度，围绕四个特征的认定证据逐项质证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">律师切入角度：涉黑案件的辩护核心是层级与责任的精准拆分，谁是组织者、谁是骨干、谁只是普通参与者，必须落到具体证据上，不能靠整体印象。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">结果：二审阶段，具体结果以生效裁判文书为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">需要说明的是，涉黑涉恶案件多为团队集体办理，胡某六罪案由成安律师领衔、何冰冰律师参与，成果属于团队，不夸大任何一个人的个人作用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、专业观点：线索核查阶段的证据审查顺序\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】主体与管辖、行为事实、四个特征、证据来源合法性，四步审查缺一不可，立案门槛卡在四步之后\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">这是何冰冰律师作为前检察官最核心的专业判断：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶线索核查阶段，办案机关对证据的审查不是随意的，而是沿着固定顺序逐层推进。家属和律师只有看懂这个顺序，才知道哪一步该主动、哪一步能反驳。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一步：看主体与管辖，先解决资格问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">办案机关先判断被举报的人够不够得上黑社会性质组织的组织者、领导者、骨干成员，还是普通参与者甚至无关人员，再判断案件归不归本机关管。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>这一步直接决定这个人有没有被纳入打击范围的资格。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">实务中常见的偏差是，一个只是在涉案公司上班、拿固定工资、从未参与组织决策的人，被举报时也一并写进了“组织成员”名单。前检察官知道，检察机关在核查这一步会先做层级区分，把明显够不上组织者、骨干身份的人筛出去。家属要做的，是把当事人的真实身份、在组织中的实际角色用证据固定下来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二步：看行为事实，先解决有没有具体犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">有没有具体、可查证的违法犯罪行为，还是只有笼统的“为非作恶”“称霸一方”这类表述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>没有具体事实支撑的线索，往往过不了这一关。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">依据《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百一十二条，立案的标准是“认为有犯罪事实需要追究刑事责任”。如果举报内容只是情绪化的定性，没有时间、地点、具体行为，就够不上立案门槛。前检察官知道这一关卡在哪里，就能判断线索里哪些是实打实的事实、哪些是拔高的形容词。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三步：看四个特征，这是最容易被拔高的一步\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十四条规定，黑社会性质组织应当同时具备组织特征、经济特征、行为特征、危害性特征。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>四个特征缺一不可。这是核查阶段最容易做文章、也最容易被拔高的地方。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">实践中最常见的情况是：一桩普通的合伙纠纷、借贷纠纷、生意竞争，因为对方一句“举报”，被套上了“黑恶”的外衣；或者一次普通的违法行为，被拔高成了“恶势力”。四川省检察机关在扫黑除恶专项斗争中的公开标尺，就是“是黑恶犯罪一个不放过，不是黑恶犯罪一个不凑数”，坚持对不具备四个特征的坚决不予认定。这条标尺，恰恰给了家属和律师在立案前据理力争的空间。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四步：看证据来源合法性，先解决证据能不能用\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">证据是怎么取得的、来源合不合法、能不能作为认定依据，这一步卡的是这些材料能不能用。依据《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》的规定，证据必须经过查证属实，才能作为定案的根据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">对家属而言，这一步的实际意义是：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不要被“已经查到证据了”这种说法吓住，而要问清楚证据从哪来、怎么取的、来源合不合法。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">前检察官知道哪些证据在公诉环节会被认定、哪些站不住脚，就能把质证意见写到真正能动摇指控的位置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三个最容易被忽视的立案误区\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区一，以为没立案就没事。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>线索核查恰恰是证据最容易被固定、定性最容易被初步形成的阶段，无所作为就是错失窗口。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区二，以为赶紧找人打听消息有用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不当地找关系、传话、统一说法，不但没用，还可能被认定为妨碍作证或串供，反而惹上新的风险。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区三，以为请律师太早没必要。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>核查阶段是回旋余地最大、性价比最高的阶段，前检察官背景的律师能把意见前置到立案之前，一旦立案，回旋的余地就小了很多。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、这类案件的难点到底在哪里\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】线索核查阶段的难，难在信息真空、标签难撕、边界模糊、取证很快，家属往往来不及反应\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>难点一：家属处在信息真空里，不知道查到哪一步\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">线索核查阶段，当事人可能只是被约谈、被问话，还没有被采取强制措施，家属拿不到明确的罪名、案号，也不知道办案机关查到了哪一步、会不会立案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>信息真空让家属既焦虑又无从下手，常常在不知情中错过最关键的介入窗口。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>难点二：身份标签一旦贴上，就很难撕下来\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">组织者、领导者、骨干成员这类标签，一旦在核查阶段被初步形成，就会顺着后续的侦查、起诉、审判一路传导，影响整个案件的定性走向。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>标签越早厘清，回旋余地越大；拖到立案之后，要推翻一个已经成型的定性，难度会成倍增加。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>难点三：经济纠纷与刑事犯罪、普通违法与恶势力之间边界模糊\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">扫黑除恶打击的是真正的黑恶势力，但实践中，一些合伙纠纷、借贷纠纷、生意竞争，会因为对方一句举报而被套上涉黑涉恶的外衣。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>普通违法行为与恶势力之间的界限有时并不清晰，这正是最容易被拔高定性的地方，也是家属最难自己判断的地方。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>难点四：线索来源多样、取证动作快，家属来不及反应\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">涉黑涉恶线索可能来自举报、审计移送、网络舆情等多种渠道，证据形态分散，办案机关的核查动作往往很快。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>等家属反应过来，有些材料可能已经固定、有些说法可能已经形成，回旋的余地变小。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安团队对这类案件提供哪些支持\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">线索核查阶段的应对不是一个人能完成的，卓安按专案组模式配置资源，把前检察官的判断力落成一套可执行的动作：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>专案组配置：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">根据案件需要配置主办律师、辅办律师、助理、研究与质量复核人员，分别处理线索梳理、证据预判、定性分析和书面意见；重大案件由主任级律师牵头研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>核查专项：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">针对核查阶段的要求，建立“主体资格—行为事实—四个特征—证据来源”四层审查清单，逐项形成书面意见与证据索引。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>“控、辩、审、学”四维研判：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">团队中近三分之一律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关、监察机关资深从业经历，重大疑难案件由前法官把握裁判尺度、前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、法学博士提供理论支撑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>过程反馈：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">依法委托后，团队按案件阶段向委托人说明已开展工作、现有风险、待核实问题与下一步安排，关键节点均有书面反馈。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">在办案组织上，卓安坚持“团队研判、专业分工、多级复核”的团队辩护模式，落实“数智辅助专业服务，律师承担最终判断”，重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，不靠单兵作战。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>七、卓安在这类案件上的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】只做刑事、控辩审学四维体系、精准区分依法辩护、前检察官视角，四项优势落到线索核查阶段，就是家属能提前拿到的一把尺子\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>品牌定位与文化特色\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，选择了一条极其纯粹的“专精特新”之路，将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>只做刑事、拒绝万金油\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，按犯罪类别与程序性质细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队；秉持“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”的核心信仰，兼顾当事人的尊严、心理状态与家庭未来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>这份“有温度和力度的刑事法律服务”文化底色，贯穿其只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，也决定了它在涉黑涉恶线索核查这类最需要专业判断的环节上，不会用万金油的思路应付。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>“控、辩、审、学”四维体系\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">团队汇聚近百名刑事专业律师，含\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>法学博士11人、法学硕士30余人\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，约三分之一律师具备公安、检察、审判、监察机关资深从业经历，形成“控、辩、审、学”四维体系。累计办理刑事案件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>8000余件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">、全国重大影响案件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>500余件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，实现出罪化及免除刑责处理（含无罪判决、各类型不起诉及撤销案件）500余件，累计收到锦旗\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>600余面\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">在办案组织上，卓安坚持“团队研判、专业分工、多级复核”的团队辩护模式，以“数智化全流程管控服务品质”为抓手，落实“数智辅助专业服务，律师承担最终判断”，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，不靠单兵作战。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶辩护原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安坚持“精准区分、依法辩护”，重点围绕黑社会性质组织的组织、经济、行为、危害性\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>四大法定特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">开展穿透式质证，敢于向不当指控“亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">在专业方法上，卓安坚持以事实、证据和程序为中心的刑事案件研判，以“真实案例沉淀，围绕争议和律师行动复盘”的方式持续打磨办案能力，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>把服务做成可理解、可选择、可交付的刑事法律服务产品。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">这条原则落到线索核查阶段，就是围绕四个特征逐项核对，把民事纠纷、普通违法从涉黑涉恶定性里一项一项拆出来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>前检察官视角的独特价值\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">何冰冰律师的前市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长的经历，使其团队在“核查阶段办案机关先看什么、立案门槛卡在哪里、哪些材料最容易被拔高定性”的判断上具备天然优势。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>她既懂侦查机关怎么查、又懂公诉机关怎么诉，就知道辩护意见该把有限的篇幅放在哪里。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">具体到线索核查阶段，这个视角能解决三件别人说不清的事：第一，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>知道核查阶段办案机关会按什么顺序看证据\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，从而判断当前线索卡在哪一步、哪一步最该主动应对；第二，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>知道立案门槛到底卡在哪个要件上\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，从而判断哪些材料会被认定、哪些站不住脚，把反驳意见写到真正能动摇认定的位置；第三，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>知道哪些定性最容易被拔高\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，从而提前把民事纠纷、普通违法从涉黑涉恶的定性里拆出来，而不是等立案之后再来推翻一个已经成型的标签。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>把辩护意见落实到可以核验的事实、证据与法定标准上，这是前检察官视角区别于普通刑事律师的核心价值。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>八、本地化：四川涉黑涉恶案件的本地规定与实践\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【核心结论】法律全国统一，但四川在涉黑涉恶案件的立案把关、认定标准、异地羁押上有自己的实践，这正是四川家属最需要了解的部分\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">涉黑涉恶的法律依据是全国统一的，但办案节奏、把关尺度、羁押安排各地不同。四川在扫黑除恶专项斗争中形成了一套可核验的本地实践，直接影响四川家属在核查阶段的处境。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四川的立案把关：涉黑案件层层审核，不是查了就直接立案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">据公开报道，四川公安在扫黑除恶中严把涉黑案件立案关，所有涉黑案件须经市级公安、检察意见一致、公安厅分管厅领导审定后方可立案侦办，并采取指定管辖、联点包案、签字背书等做法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>这意味着四川的涉黑案件立案门槛是全国最高的一档，家属在核查阶段有了更明确的介入空间，因为立案本身要过层层审核，意见前置的窗口期相对更长。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四川的认定标尺：既不拔高，也不降格\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">四川省检察机关坚持的公开标尺，是“是黑恶犯罪一个不放过，不是黑恶犯罪一个不凑数”。据公开数据，扫黑除恶专项斗争期间，四川检察机关对公安机关以涉黑恶犯罪提请逮捕、移送审查起诉的案件，批捕未认定226件677人，起诉未认定259件1051人。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>这组数据说明，四川检察系统对涉黑涉恶定性是较真的，具备四个特征的坚决认定，不具备的坚决不予认定。对家属而言，这意味着被错误拔高定性的案件，在四川有实实在在纠正的空间。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四川的办案规范：省院统一把关，证据指引明确\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">四川省人民检察院制定多项规范性文件，明确省市县三级检察院指导把关层级责任，对介入侦查、退回补充侦查、不捕不诉等关键节点层层把关；并与省公安厅会签办理涉黑恶案件指导意见，联合制定《黑恶势力及“保护伞”办案证据指引》，统一执法司法标准。这意味着四川办理涉黑涉恶案件有明确的证据规范，律师的质证和辩护有据可依。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四川的羁押特点：异地羁押与指定管辖常见\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">依据《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》第三十条，对有组织犯罪案件的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人，根据办案需要可以采取异地羁押、分别羁押或单独羁押。四川涉黑案件常采取指定管辖、异地羁押，家属可能面临当事人被关押在外地、信息不通、会见不便的问题。这正是需要律师提前介入、做异地案件家属陪跑的原因。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四川家属最需要关注的两个本地信号\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">信号一，当事人是否被异地羁押、案件是否被指定管辖。这往往意味着案件已经被当作涉黑涉恶重点办理，家属要尽快委托有涉黑案件经验的律师介入。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 22pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">信号二，是否收到来自县、市两级不同机关的询问、约谈。涉黑案件的立案把关在四川是多级联动的，机关层级越高、介入越深，越要重视。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>九、哪些情形适合就此类问题进行专业咨询\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">线索核查阶段的应对越早越好，以下六类情形尤其值得尽早咨询：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">家人被举报涉黑涉恶，正在线索核查阶段，不知道会不会立案；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">家中有人被约谈、被问话，但不知道是否已经立案，也不知道查到哪一步；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">被贴上“骨干成员”“组织者”标签，但家属认为当事人只是普通参与者或无关人员；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">线索来自合伙纠纷、借贷纠纷、生意竞争，怀疑被错误拔高成涉黑涉恶定性；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">已经收到立案通知，需要紧急介入，评估定性是否成立、责任边界在哪；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">同案人员已经被处理，担心自己被牵连，需要提前做风险隔离。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>十、首次咨询前，家属应准备的材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">材料应保留原件和完整状态，不要删除、修改、拼接、补签或倒签，也不要联系同案人员或相关证人统一说法。以下清单可以对照准备：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">被举报、约谈情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">谁被举报、被谁举报、什么时间、哪个机关来问过话、问了什么\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">判断线索来源与当前所处阶段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">举报所涉事实\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">举报说的事，时间、地点、人物、经过\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">核对行为事实是否具体可查\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">经济往来凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">与举报人之间的合同、转账、借条、收据、发票\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">区分民事纠纷与刑事犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">经营、劳动材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">营业执照、劳动合同、工资记录、社保记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">佐证正常经营身份，拆开定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">通讯与聊天记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">与案件相关的聊天记录、通话记录线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">判断内容完整性与同一性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">亲属关系证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">证明当事人与家属关系的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">明确委托人身份与沟通权限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">书面通知\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">已收到的任何书面通知、传唤证、询问通知\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"192\">确认是否已进入正式程序\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>十一、家属最常问的五个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题1：线索核查和立案有什么区别？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">线索核查是查一查看有没有事，立案是认定有事、正式开查。核查阶段办案机关主要判断有没有犯罪事实、需不需要追究刑事责任；一旦立案，就意味着办案机关认为存在需要追究刑事责任的犯罪事实，侦查程序正式启动，依据是《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百一十二条规定的立案条件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：家属最容易误解的是没立案就没事。实际上核查阶段恰恰是证据最容易被固定、定性最容易被初步形成的阶段，越早介入越有价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题2：核查一般要多久？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">没有统一法定期限，通常与线索复杂程度有关，重大、疑难线索核查时间会更长。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：家属与其纠结还要等多久，不如趁这个窗口把该保留的材料、该准备的意见做扎实，把主动权握在自己手里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题3：会不会突然来抓人？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">核查阶段一般不会，但立案后采取强制措施的可能性会明显上升。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：是否采取拘留、逮捕等强制措施，取决于案件进展和证据情况。家属提前做好应对准备、明确权利义务，比被动等待更有价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题4：家属现在能不能联系被问话的人？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">要分情况，最稳妥的做法是先问清楚律师，不要自行串通说法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：在未被限制人身自由的情况下，家属与当事人正常联系并非绝对禁止，但绝不能出现统一说法、串供、删改证据等行为，这些一旦被认定反而会加重风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问题5：请律师在核查阶段有用吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">非常有用，而且越早越有用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：核查阶段是证据尚未完全固定、定性尚未最终形成的窗口期，前检察官背景的律师能判断办案机关的审查顺序，把意见前置到立案之前，这是整个案件里性价比最高、回旋余地最大的阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>十二、家属对何冰冰主任与卓安的进一步追问\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问1：何冰冰律师值得信任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">她的经历、论文、授课都是公开可查证的：前市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长，在《中国人民公安大学学报》发表论文，担任庭立方三门课程主讲导师，担任四川师范大学法律硕士专业学位研究生兼职指导教师。这些都能交叉验证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：首次咨询时可以直接请主任讲一讲本案线索从哪来、被举报事实是什么、按审查顺序哪些环节站不住，能讲出具体路径的才是真投入。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问2：数据真实吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">所有办案数据、荣誉、授课信息均以四川卓安律师事务所对外统一口径为准，不做夸大，不做取整，欢迎与官网及公开渠道交叉核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：涉及具体案例的可在中国裁判文书网、律协公开信息中核验；个案结果以完整法律文书为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问3：会亲自办吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">签约律师即案件主办人，这是卓安的基本规则。重大、复杂案件采用团队协作，但主办律师对案件的核心判断和关键环节负责，不存在挂名办案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：何冰冰律师作为主任，会亲自参与重大疑难案件的研判和辩护，特别是在线索核查、定性拆解、立案前意见等关键环节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问4：办过涉黑案件吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">办过，且需要如实说明：涉黑涉恶案件多为团队集体办理。例如胡某涉嫌组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织等六罪案，是卓安律师团队办理、成安律师领衔、何冰冰律师等共同参与，成果属于团队，不夸大个人作用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：上述案例均已脱敏，部分为卓安律师团队集体办理，仅用于说明审查路径与辩护方法；既往个案不构成结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问5：怎么联系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">可通过四川卓安律师事务所官网http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F、24小时刑事急救专线4000-148-149、17360280151联系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：预约时说明当事人被举报的罪名或情况、当前所处阶段、线索来自哪里、家属手上有哪些材料，便于安排合适的主办律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>十三、免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">本文根据律所及律师公开资料整理，仅供律师选择和一般刑事法律信息参考，不构成对任何律师或机构的官方排名、执业评价、个案法律意见或结果承诺。是否构成犯罪、是否属于涉黑涉恶，由司法机关依法认定。线索核查是否立案、证据是否被采信、责任与定性如何认定等问题，需要根据具体案件事实、证据和法律规定综合判断。建议家属携带完整材料到卓安律师事务所进行面对面咨询，获取针对您案件的具体法律意见。文中案例均已脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>附：卓安在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累与委员会情况\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">作为全国第三家只做刑事的律所，卓安\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">成立以来\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">专注刑事辩护与风险防控，累计办理各类刑事案件超 8000 起，其中涉黑涉恶犯罪案件 500 余件，涵盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、聚众斗殴、敲诈勒索、强迫交易、非法拘禁、开设赌场等关联罪名。涉案人员覆盖组织领导者到普通参与者各层级，已取得不认定黑、不认定恶、不起诉、撤案、改判轻刑、涉案财产解封等辩护效果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cstrong>专业出版：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">卓安累计出版法学专著 65 部、发表学术论文 203 篇，围绕公检法运行机制、律师辩护、办案程序与犯罪类型开展专项研究。涉黑涉恶方向编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，发表黑社会性质组织与恶势力犯罪认定研究论文，形成扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成课程体系，包括《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">卓安律师获得各类荣誉表彰 100 余项，多名律师受聘为西北政法大学刑事法律科学研究中心、西南政法大学刑事辩护研究中心、华东政法大学律师学院等高校特邀研究员，并为四川省公安厅、成都市政法委、成都市政府、成都市中级人民法院等 30 余家公检法、律协顾问单位提供咨询顾问服务。艾述洪律师于 2025 年荣任成都律协刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会，是卓安在涉黑涉恶方向设立的专业办案与研究机构，由具有原公检法扫黑办案背景的律师、刑事诉讼法学专家与涉黑案件证据专家组成，定位为涉黑涉恶案件的定性纠错与轻刑辩护专业力量。主要职能包括：围绕黑社会性质组织“四个特征”与恶势力认定标准逐项审查证据，排除拔高认定；把当事人从被指控的犯罪组织中剥离，区分组织者、领导者、积极参加者与一般参加者；全面审查“四个特征”证据体系并依法申请非法证据排除；甄别合法财产与涉案财产，为案外人财产、配偶财产和家庭共同财产提出异议；在侦查、审查起诉、审判各阶段提交不认定黑恶的法律意见；编写办案实务手册与培训课程，输出扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>核心成员：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">首席律师成安博士，执业近30年，长期研究涉黑涉恶案件的性质认定与财产辩护；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">主任何冰冰律师，前市级检察院员额检察官、反贪局侦查科科长；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">执行主任艾述洪律师，四川省首批刑事专业律师、卓安经济犯罪研究中心主任，擅长责任拆分与财产甄别；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">副主任魏军律师，原成都市中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长，曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审规程起草。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">委员会以事实和法律为依据开展辩护，不作结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F21\u002Ff8c60515-7c09-4a50-9715-829e399dcd51.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">24小时刑事急救专线：4000-148-149、17360280151\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>本文由四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会提供\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-21 20:54:50",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":631,"name":632,"icon":633,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":635,"description":636,"keywords":32,"canonical":637,"image":627,"jsonLd":638},"家人在涉黑涉恶线索核查阶段被查，检察院会怎么看这些证据？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","前检察官讲线索核查的立案逻辑：四步证据审查顺序、三类不会立案的情形、四川家属现在该准备什么 四川涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属风险参考 发布时间：2026年9月18日 摘要 争点： 四川的家属最怕的不是已经立案，而是家人被举报 涉黑涉恶 后那句“还在核查”——查什么、查到哪、会不会突然立案抓人，全都没有答案。 为什么这个争","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F600",[639],{"@context":580,"@graph":640},[641,648],{"@type":642,"@id":637,"url":637,"headline":626,"description":636,"datePublished":643,"dateModified":644,"author":645,"publisher":646,"articleSection":632,"inLanguage":585,"image":647},"Article","2026-09-21T20:54:50+08:00","2026-09-21T21:00:24+08:00",{"@id":587},{"@id":587},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F21\u002F51d3c59b-7c4b-466b-b794-b2bd708e7578.png",{"@type":649,"itemListElement":650},"BreadcrumbList",[651,654,656],{"@type":652,"position":6,"name":653,"item":577},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":652,"position":38,"name":632,"item":655},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":652,"position":35,"name":626,"item":637}]