[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-546":622},{"entity":4,"seo":574},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":176,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":238,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":309,"serviceTags":310,"serviceCategories":534,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":551,"homeStats":552,"serviceProducts":564},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,164,168,172],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},315,"X某涉嫌巨额财产来源不明罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻刑","一、案情简介 被告人徐某，系中国XX银行四川省D市市分行党组书记、行长。曾系F市市分行副行长、行长。2006年1月23日因涉嫌犯违法发放贷款罪被四川省公安厅刑事拘留，同年2月23日被逮捕，并由中纪委督办该案。四川省资阳市检察院对徐某等三人提","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},314,"Y某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其成功轻罪辩护","一、抢劫罪及盗窃罪之源头 我的当事人袁某跟很多怀抱梦想的年轻人一样，从四川省的一个小县城来到成都，想实现自己的理想，然而世事多变却让他走上了犯罪的道路。2009年9月26日，袁某与同伙李某共谋在成都某大学门口附近，采用手持石块、语言威胁的方",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},313,"七次共谋参与抢劫达50余万元，团队律师成功为L某辩护，获从轻处罚","一、案情简介 L某、Y某以非法占有为目的，七次共谋采用持刀威胁、实施暴力的方法抢劫出租车，被抢现金及手机等共计价值11000余元，被抢出租车共计价值50余万元 L某、Y某长期在网吧上网，没有经济来源，遂产生抢劫他人财物的念头。2011年7月",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},312,"W某从网友家盗走9800元，控方建议判处有期徒刑二年半，团队律师一番激辩，法庭当庭宣判有期徒刑一年","一、案情简介 2012年11月某日，被告人W某到网友L某的租住房内玩耍，后L某有事外出，W某临时起意，趁机将L某放在家中提包内的现金9800元秘密拿走后逃离。2012年11月28日，W某在Z市被民警挡获，赃款被追回并发还被害人。检方指控，W",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},311,"L某涉嫌滥用职权罪、受贿罪，团队律师为其滥用职权罪做无罪辩护，对受贿罪做罪轻辩护","一、案情简介 （一）2012年，被告人芦某在担任S省XX委员会XX推进处（以下简称省经信委推进处）处长期间，违反S省省级战略性新兴产业发展促进资金（以下简称发展资金）评审规定，帮助不符合评审条件的成都某电子有限责任公司（以下简称甲公司）获取",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},310,"H某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，从第一被告变更为第三被告，获从轻处罚","一、案情简介 H某因与同伙成立“某算力”平台，在经营过程中以为需求客户提供算力为噱头，并以投资虚拟币即有高额回报为诱饵，引诱参加者继续发展他人参加，分级与下线人数较多，具有传销性质。公诉机关指控H某犯组织、领导传销活动罪，涉案金额400万余",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},309,"X某涉嫌妨害信用卡管理罪、帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 向某因涉嫌妨害信用卡管理罪，2019年6月13日被成都市公安局天府新区分局刑事拘留，同年7月19日，经成都市公安局天府新区分局决定取保候审；因涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，于2020年6月10日被利川市公安局刑事拘留，同年7月2",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},308,"Q某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 谢某于2018年10月，虚构某酒店投资项目，通过微信向他人宣传投资可以获得酒店股权，要求参与者缴纳费用获得入股资格，并以发展人数的多少作为计酬或者返利的依据，形成一级返利20%、二级返利10%、三级返利10%的层级组织。谢某直",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},307,"T某涉嫌销售伪劣产品、销售假冒注册商标的商品罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 唐某开了一个干杂店，办案机关在其出租房中查获假烟 1800 余条，货值金额57万余元，查获假酒货值金额18 万余元。检察院以涉嫌销售伪劣产品罪、涉嫌销售假冒注册商标的商品罪两罪起诉至法院。 二、办案过程 卓安团队律师接受委托后",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},306,"Z某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2010年10月29 日张某某因涉嫌诈骗罪被刑事拘留，同年 12 月3日被执行逮捕，羁押于成都市看守所。 二、办案过程 承办律师接到委托后，立即前往看守所会见当事人，了解案件详情，同时承办律师多次与承办检察官、法官就案件存在的",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},305,"L某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其积极辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2012年9月下句，李某向被害人刘某谈称可以帮忙办理施工管理证，骗取人民币5000元，同年 10月15日，李某以同样的方式骗取被害人李某1人民币4000元.同年10月，李某向被害人刘某谎称自己有一个总价2700万元的工程，后以",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},304,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2012 年5月起，被告人邓某为谋取非法利益，纠集被告人曾某等人以伪造的证件承租车辆后予以抵押、出售等方式获利，共骗取受害人车辆六辆，总价值190余万元。 二、办案过程 在曾某被逮捕后，其家属于2012年11月30 日委托了卓",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":10,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},303,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市高新区人民检察院指控廖某某等利用职务上的便利，在多地拆迁补偿过程中，骗取国有财产，应当以贪污罪追究刑事责任。其中廖某某在共同犯罪中起主要作用是主犯，并向高新区人民法院提起诉讼，高新区人民法院于2012年11月开庭审理本案",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":10,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},302,"L某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判  ","一、案情简介 2011年6月12日，被告人李某某在本市某小区车棚内盗走被害人彭某价值人民币2241元的电动车，后被民警抓获归案。 二、办案过程 家属委托后，律师立即会见李某某，安抚其情绪，并询问案件的基本情况，并和办案机关进行了沟通，在对案",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":10,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},301,"Y某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2010年7月被告人杨某某与王某某（已判刑）采用破环手段翻墙进入某公司所有的电信基站，盗得该基站铜芯线、铜鼻、钢排等物，在逃离现场时王某某被护线队员当场挡获。经鉴定涉案铜质电线及钢质配件价值人民币2281元。 二、办案过程 承",[177,182,187,192,195,200,205,211,217],{"id":6,"code":178,"name":179,"summary":180,"keywords":181},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":183,"name":184,"summary":185,"keywords":186},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":188,"name":189,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":193,"keywords":194},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":196,"name":197,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":206,"code":207,"name":208,"summary":209,"keywords":210},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":218,"city":227,"caseType":228,"title":229,"thumbnail":230,"content":10,"publishTime":231,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":232,"lawyers":233,"lawyer":237},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[234],{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[239,242,256,272,291],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":218,"city":227,"caseType":228,"title":229,"thumbnail":230,"content":10,"publishTime":231,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":232,"lawyers":240},[241],{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":243,"createdAt":244,"updatedAt":244,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":212,"city":258,"caseType":259,"title":260,"thumbnail":261,"content":10,"publishTime":262,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":263,"lawyers":264},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[265,268],{"id":212,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":266,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":269,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":270,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":271,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":273,"createdAt":274,"updatedAt":274,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":275,"city":276,"caseType":277,"title":278,"thumbnail":279,"content":10,"publishTime":280,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":281,"lawyers":282},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[283,286],{"id":275,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":284,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":285,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":287,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":289,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":290,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":292,"createdAt":274,"updatedAt":274,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":293,"city":294,"caseType":295,"title":296,"thumbnail":297,"content":10,"publishTime":298,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":299,"lawyers":300},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[301,306],{"id":302,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":303,"position":304,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":305,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":293,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":307,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":308,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[311,320,326,333,340,347,354,360,366,375,382,389,396,403,410,419,426,433,440,446,452,457,463,469,475,481,487,496,503,510,516,522,528],{"id":312,"createdAt":313,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":317,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":302,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":322,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":323,"name":324,"summary":325,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":327,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":332,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":334,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":339,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":341,"createdAt":342,"updatedAt":343,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":344,"name":345,"summary":346,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":348,"createdAt":349,"updatedAt":350,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":351,"name":352,"summary":353,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":355,"updatedAt":356,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":357,"name":358,"summary":359,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":361,"createdAt":362,"updatedAt":362,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":363,"name":364,"summary":365,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":367,"createdAt":368,"updatedAt":369,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":370,"name":371,"summary":372,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":376,"createdAt":377,"updatedAt":378,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":379,"name":380,"summary":381,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":383,"createdAt":384,"updatedAt":385,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":386,"name":387,"summary":388,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":390,"createdAt":391,"updatedAt":392,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":393,"name":394,"summary":395,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":397,"createdAt":398,"updatedAt":399,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":400,"name":401,"summary":402,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":404,"createdAt":405,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":407,"name":408,"summary":409,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":411,"createdAt":412,"updatedAt":413,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":414,"name":415,"summary":416,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":420,"createdAt":421,"updatedAt":422,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":423,"name":424,"summary":425,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":427,"createdAt":428,"updatedAt":429,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":430,"name":431,"summary":432,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":434,"createdAt":435,"updatedAt":436,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":437,"name":438,"summary":439,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":441,"createdAt":442,"updatedAt":442,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":443,"name":444,"summary":445,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":447,"createdAt":448,"updatedAt":448,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":449,"name":450,"summary":451,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":245,"createdAt":453,"updatedAt":453,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":454,"name":455,"summary":456,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":458,"createdAt":459,"updatedAt":459,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":460,"name":461,"summary":462,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":464,"createdAt":465,"updatedAt":465,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":466,"name":467,"summary":468,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":470,"createdAt":471,"updatedAt":471,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":472,"name":473,"summary":474,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":476,"createdAt":477,"updatedAt":477,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":478,"name":479,"summary":480,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":482,"createdAt":483,"updatedAt":483,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":484,"name":485,"summary":486,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":488,"createdAt":489,"updatedAt":490,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":491,"name":492,"summary":493,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":497,"createdAt":498,"updatedAt":499,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":500,"name":501,"summary":502,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":504,"createdAt":505,"updatedAt":506,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":507,"name":508,"summary":509,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":511,"createdAt":512,"updatedAt":512,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":513,"name":514,"summary":515,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":517,"createdAt":518,"updatedAt":518,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":519,"name":520,"summary":521,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":523,"createdAt":524,"updatedAt":524,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":525,"name":526,"summary":527,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":529,"createdAt":530,"updatedAt":530,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":531,"name":532,"summary":533,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[535,539,543,547],{"id":40,"createdAt":536,"updatedAt":537,"deleted":31,"code":494,"name":495,"summary":538,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":540,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":541,"displayTags":10,"icon":542,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":544,"deleted":31,"code":373,"name":374,"summary":545,"displayTags":10,"icon":546,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":548,"deleted":31,"code":417,"name":418,"summary":549,"displayTags":10,"icon":550,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[553,556,559,562],{"value":554,"label":555},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":557,"label":558},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":560,"label":561},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":330,"label":563},"全国分所",[565,568,571],{"title":566,"desc":567},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":569,"desc":570},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":572,"desc":573},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":575,"description":13,"keywords":576,"canonical":577,"image":10,"jsonLd":578},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[579],{"@context":580,"@graph":581},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[582,588],{"@type":583,"@id":584,"url":577,"name":7,"inLanguage":585,"publisher":586},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":587},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":589,"@id":587,"name":7,"url":577,"logo":590,"image":590,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":585,"address":591,"geo":594,"department":596},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":593},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":595,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[597,602,606,610,614,618],{"@type":598,"@id":599,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":600,"parentOrganization":601},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":603,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":604,"parentOrganization":605},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":607,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":608,"parentOrganization":609},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":611,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":612,"parentOrganization":613},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":615,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":616,"parentOrganization":617},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":619,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":620,"parentOrganization":621},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":587},{"entity":623,"seo":634},{"id":624,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":625,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":626,"thumbnail":627,"content":628,"publishTime":629,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":630},546,"2026-09-18 18:03:54","卓安张罗律师丨达州讨薪带头人被指恶势力，十三年刑侦视角拆解定性","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F2143f7c2-1ad5-4abe-878a-22beb79e1d13.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789723668760.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>十三年刑警侦查视角：讨薪维权类涉黑涉恶案件的认定规则与辩护要点\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>达州涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属、企业风险参考\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年9月18日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>【真实场景】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>“我在达州带二十多个老乡做外墙，去年年底甲方拖了我们八十多万工钱，一直不给。腊月二十我们去了他们项目部，把门堵了两天，拉了横幅，有人在门口喊话，我也跟保安推搡了几下。现在我被带走了，公安说我们涉嫌寻衅滋事，还说要按恶势力查。讨自己干的活钱，怎么就成了欺压百姓？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“我妹妹在一家装修公司做人事，公司欠了几十个工人三个月工资，老板跑了。工人找到她，她帮着统计欠薪、带头去劳动局投诉，还在网上发了视频。现在公安找上门，说她组织聚众扰乱秩序。她只是帮忙整理材料，怎么就被牵连进去了？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>【先给结论与主任概览】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>第一，讨薪是法定权利，可能出问题的是维权的方式。2013年最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理寻衅滋事刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第一条明确：行为人为寻求刺激、发泄情绪、逞强耍横等，无事生非，实施刑法第二百九十三条规定的行为，应当认定为寻衅滋事；因日常生活中的偶发矛盾纠纷借故生非实施的，也应当认定，\u003Cstrong>但矛盾系由被害人故意引发或者被害人对矛盾激化负有主要责任的，一般不认定为寻衅滋事。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一条对讨薪类案件意义重大——工资被长期拖欠，用人单位本身负有主要责任，这是可以依法主张的事实基础。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，恶势力的认定有严格门槛，讨薪维权的对象特定，与为非作恶、欺压百姓相去甚远。两高两部《关于办理恶势力犯罪案件若干问题的指导意见》要求经常纠集在一起、以暴力威胁或者其他手段、在一定区域或者行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动，且要区分纠集者、首要分子与一般参与者。\u003Cstrong>工人向特定债务人主张特定债权，与在一定区域或者行业内欺压不特定对象，是两种完全不同的事实结构。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 把前者套进后者，是对认定标准的误用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，真正需要立刻做的三件事是：保全欠薪证据、厘清每个人做了什么、避免集合统一口径。欠薪的证明链条包括劳动合同、考勤记录、工资流水、欠条、结算单、甲方欠付的凭证，以及此前向劳动监察部门投诉的记录。\u003Cstrong>这些材料既能说明行为的起因，也能把当事人的角色与行为边界固定下来。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 千万不要在案发后集中删除聊天记录或者召集工人开会统一说辞。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗律师是卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，中共党员，达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，拥有13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，荣立三等功，获评优秀公务员、破案能手。他带领的团队深谙达州各区县侦查思维、办案流程与裁判尺度，打造前置化、应急化、本土化的37天黄金救援体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任的优势来自一个别人不容易复制的角度：\u003Cstrong>他在侦查这一侧工作过十三年，清楚一个案子在立案前后会被抓哪几个点、证据会从哪里收集、批捕审查时最看重什么。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在讨薪维权类案件中，这一视角的意义很直接——什么时候去沟通最有效、哪些行为会被记入笔录、家属在什么阶段提交哪些材料，都有相对清晰的预判。其办理的郑某敲诈勒索案，从一审判决的十二年，到二审改判七年半，是一审、二审两个阶段持续争取的结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、为什么讨薪容易踩到刑事红线？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>先看行为的演化过程。讨薪的第一步通常是协商，协商无效后进入投诉、仲裁、诉讼，如果这些渠道用尽仍然拿不到钱，情绪就会转向直接对抗：堵门、拉横幅、围堵项目部、阻止施工、在网上曝光。\u003Cstrong>法律对前一段是保护，对后一段则要看具体形态——一旦手段指向公共秩序或者他人人身财产，评价就变了。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>再看最常被适用的罪名。讨薪类案件中最常见的是寻衅滋事罪，其次是聚众扰乱社会秩序罪、聚众扰乱公共场所秩序罪、非法拘禁罪（如限制甲方人员离开）、故意毁坏财物罪、敲诈勒索罪，还可能叠加恶势力认定。\u003Cstrong>这些罪名的构成要件差别很大，把行为按动作拆开、逐项对应，是辩护的第一步。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>还要看责任的分层。同一场讨薪行动里，组织者、积极参与者与跟随者的评价完全不同。很多案件中，一线工人只是跟着去、跟着喊，甚至只是负责统计和记录，\u003Cstrong>如果把他们与策划者同等对待，就是对参与程度的误判。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 张罗主任在办理涉黑涉恶案件时反复强调的一个方法，就是把每个人具体做了什么列成清单，逐项评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>最后看用工一侧的路径。拒不支付劳动报酬罪是《刑法》第二百七十六条之一规定的罪名，针对的是有能力支付而不支付劳动报酬、数额较大、经政府有关部门责令支付仍不支付的行为。\u003Cstrong>这意味着讨薪完全可以走合法且有效的路径：劳动监察投诉、申请仲裁、提起诉讼，以及在符合条件时向公安机关控告。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 走对路径，风险自然下降。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、寻衅滋事类案件为什么难？四个难点必须面对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一个难点：起因正当不能直接免除行为责任，但必须作为核心事实主张。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>工资被拖欠是事实，堵门、阻工也是事实，两者必须分别评价，不能相互抵消。辩护的关键是把起因作为行为背景完整呈现，同时用司法解释第一条关于被害人对矛盾激化负有主要责任的规定，争取不作为寻衅滋事处理。\u003Cstrong>只讲可怜，不构成辩护；只讲行为，也不完整。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二个难点：现场行为几乎没有客观记录，主要依靠言词证据。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>堵门、拉横幅、喊话这类行为通常没有视频完整记录，事后取证依赖双方陈述与旁观者证言。\u003Cstrong>同一场行动里，谁下的决定、谁喊的话、谁动的手，往往各说各话。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 尽早固定现场视频、通话记录、群聊记录与在场人员的客观分工，是避免责任被平均分配的关键。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三个难点：钱的数额小、涉及人数多，容易被概括成团伙作案。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>欠薪金额往往不高，但涉及工人数量多、行动人数多，容易被概括为有组织的团伙。\u003Cstrong>这里必须区分组织的对象是内部工人还是外部对象\u003C\u002Fstrong>——把工人组织起来去维权，与组织起来去欺压他人，性质完全不同，需要在辩护中说清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四个难点：行政、民事与刑事三条程序同时推进，家属容易顾此失彼。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>欠薪纠纷本身是劳动争议，可能同时在劳动监察、仲裁、民事诉讼三条线上推进；而刑事程序一旦启动，节奏会完全不同。\u003Cstrong>什么时候主张民事权利、什么时候回应刑事指控、两者如何相互支撑，需要有整体安排。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、张罗律师团队会怎样推进讨薪类案件的辩护？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>这类案件的辩护是一套按起因固定、行为拆解、角色定位、程序协同、节点沟通、家属反馈推进的系统工作。结合卓安的团队配置与办案模式，具体操作如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>起因固定：收集劳动合同、考勤、工资流水、欠条、结算单与劳动监察投诉记录，把欠薪事实完整固定下来，作为行为背景的客观基础。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>行为拆解：把现场行为按动作、时间、地点、参与人拆开，逐项对应寻衅滋事罪、聚众扰乱社会秩序罪等罪名的构成要件，判断是否达到入罪标准。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>角色定位：区分决策者、带头者、跟随者与仅负责记录统计的人员，把每个人的具体行为、知情范围与获利情况列成清单，防止责任被平均分配。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的辨析：论证是否存在事出有因、被害人负主要责任的情形；判断能否由重罪向轻罪评价迁移。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>程序协同：同步关注劳动监察、仲裁、民事诉讼与刑事程序的进度，让民事权利的主张与刑事辩护相互支撑。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>家属反馈：按阶段说明已开展工作、现有风险、待核实问题与下一步安排，提醒家属不要召集工人统一说法、不要删除聊天记录。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>具体到达州本地案件，卓安（达州）分所把侦查流程预判、批捕审查要点把握、37天黄金救援期内的快速会见与法律意见提交等方法融入每一个环节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、卓安涉黑涉恶案例能说明哪些辩护路径？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：郑某敲诈勒索案——一审十二年、二审改判七年半，量刑大幅下调】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 郑某因敲诈勒索被提起公诉，一审被判处有期徒刑十二年，当事人与家属几乎不抱希望，二审阶段委托张罗主任介入。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安张罗主任接手案件后，重新梳理证据、调整辩护思路，围绕索款依据的真实来源、当事人在共同行为中的作用与地位、以及量刑情节逐项展开，并就一审认定中证据不足与评价不当的部分集中提出意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一案的示范意义在于：索财类犯罪的辩护核心，是把钱的依据摆出来。只要有真实的权利基础，非法占有目的的认定就有讨论空间；同时，量刑不是一个整体，而是由若干可以逐个争取的情节累积而成。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 二审改判，\u003Cstrong>有期徒刑由十二年改判为七年半\u003C\u002Fstrong>，在已形成定局的案件中实现了实质性突破。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：董某涉黑四罪案——围堵工厂索要工程款，剥离敲诈勒索重罪指控】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 检察机关指控董某参与以杜某为核心的黑社会性质组织、非法从事房屋拆迁和土建行业并系骨干成员，指控事实包括因认定施工亏本而多次电话威胁、殴打发包方项目经理，并组织人员围堵工厂、拉闸断电致使企业停产一个月；此外还包括为取得土建挖方工程纠集四十余人打砸工地、在竞标失败后强行索要赔偿等。案卷材料上千页。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队从上千页案卷中深挖有利证据：一是论证案涉团伙人员之间关系松散，缺乏明确分工与帮规帮纪，亦无明确的组织利益，不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征；二是\u003Cstrong>论证在某工厂纠纷中索要的是被拖欠的工程款、目的具有合法性，不能因催收手段过激而直接等同于敲诈勒索\u003C\u002Fstrong>；三是就寻衅滋事部分提出依法系起次要、辅助作用的从犯。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这是讨薪维权类案件最值得研究的一个样本：索款的目的是要回本属于自己的钱，和以非法占有为目的勒索他人财物，是两种不同的主观状态。\u003Cstrong>把付款义务的来源讲清楚，重罪指控就可能被剥离。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 起诉书原指控敲诈勒索数额巨大、任意毁坏公私财物情节严重，依法可能面临极为严厉的刑罚。经律师团队提交详实辩护词并据理力争，市中级人民法院一审判决\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚，最终从轻决定执行有期徒刑十一年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：杨某恶势力团伙催收非法债务案——审查起诉阶段打掉聚众斗殴罪，数罪并罚仅执行五年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 杨某在当地经营小额贷款公司，在收取贷款过程中与部分逾期客户发生冲突，对部分长期坏账客户采取限制人身自由、恐吓等方式，并被指控牵涉当地多起打架斗殴事件，被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队分两阶段推进：审查起诉阶段针对面临刑罚最重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致证据比对与质证，成功促使检察院撤回该项起诉；审判阶段邀请刑法专家论证法条竞合，提出刑法修正案（十一）新增的催收非法债务罪与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪存在法条包容性竞合，并\u003Cstrong>反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处\u003C\u002Fstrong>——催收行为事出有因、存在债务前提，被告人没有无事生非、扰乱社会公共秩序的主观动机，被害人往往存在违约过错。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 事出有因是这类案件最有力的辩护支点。把债务关系、违约事实与行为方式三条线摆在一起，足以说明行为针对的是特定对象，而不是无事生非、随意扰乱社会秩序。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用更为严苛的重罪重罚，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：唐某某参加黑社会性质组织罪等六罪案——寻衅滋事等个罪逐项审查，厘清参与程度】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 以张某为首的黑社会性质组织在四川德昌、西昌等地有组织地实施开设赌场、聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事、抢劫、非法拘禁等违法犯罪活动，致2人死亡、2人自杀经抢救康复、多人受伤，并对当地火车站货物运输形成非法控制。唐某某被指控为该组织的积极参与者，罪名包括参加黑社会性质组织罪、开设赌场罪、聚众斗殴罪、寻衅滋事罪、抢劫罪、强迫交易罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队多次前往看守所会见，在全面梳理海量卷宗的基础上，针对并非每个被告人都参与了组织的每一个具体犯罪这一特点，对每一项罪名逐项审查参与程度与作用大小，积极依法与公诉人、法官沟通案情并提交针对性辩护意见，一审宣判后继续代为提起上诉并提供二审辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 涉黑涉恶案件被告人极多、卷宗海量、非全员参与全部犯罪。\u003Cstrong>即便被认定涉黑，各个具体罪名仍然必须逐项审查证据、逐项评价参与程度\u003C\u002Fstrong>，这一规则对讨薪维权类案件中被卷入的普通工人同样适用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院经审理依法判决，数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑二十年，剥夺政治权利二年，并处没收个人全部财产。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案——退股纠纷中的民事维权与刑事敲诈边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件起因是曾某、黄某与被害人程某共同出资设立的投资公司未实际经营，程某提出退股，双方就股本金退还多次协商未果，后在协商中以威胁方式迫使程某出具借条，黄某被指控构成涉恶势力犯罪的敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队提出：案件起因系公司退股的真实民事纠纷、被害人存在过错；\u003Cstrong>股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷属于两种不同的民事法律关系，不应将民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>；黄某与主犯在动机、过错程度上存在明显区别，依法应认定为从犯，且已积极退赔并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 民事纠纷与刑事敲诈之间隔着一道非法占有目的的门槛。把纠纷的起因、双方权利义务与实际取得的结果摆清楚，这道门槛就能被看见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在全案被定性为涉恶案件、面临从严惩处的背景下，法院采纳从轻处罚意见，\u003Cstrong>当事人最终被从轻判处有期徒刑三年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：四川雷某某涉黑五罪死刑复核案——寻衅滋事等个罪逐一拆解，死刑立即执行改判死缓】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 雷某某被控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、寻衅滋事罪、容留他人吸毒罪五罪，一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行，案件报最高人民法院死刑复核。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队成立重大疑难案件专案组，反复研究上千页案卷并委托专门机构进行笔迹鉴定，形成近20页辩护意见：涉黑部分主张在案证据不足以证明符合组织特征、经济特征，没有证据证明存在国家工作人员包庇纵容的非法保护特征，涉案事件多系经济纠纷引发；故意杀人部分主张当事人不在现场、无剥夺他人生命的故意；\u003Cstrong>针对故意伤害罪、寻衅滋事罪、容留他人吸毒罪，分别从事实不清、证据不足、定性错误等角度逐一拆解辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 涉黑案件往往罪名多、事实多，但真正撑起最重量刑的通常只有一两件事。\u003Cstrong>把每一项指控单独检验一遍，才能找到证据链最薄弱的那一环。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 该案经最高人民法院复核，\u003Cstrong>不予核准死刑并发回重审，由死刑立即执行改判死刑缓期二年执行\u003C\u002Fstrong>，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 7：陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案——全案摘掉涉黑帽子，仅因普通轻微犯罪判一年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 陈某被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等罪名，团伙成员多为同学、老乡。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队精准击破组织特征：指出该团伙系同学、老乡基于哥们义气形成的松散社交关系，缺乏明确的帮规帮纪与经济管控，坚决作不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依据《刑法》第二百九十四条，缺乏纪律规约、人员松散的普通犯罪团伙，难以被评价为黑社会性质组织。\u003Cstrong>一伙人凑在一起做事，和有组织地欺压百姓，中间隔着一整套认定标准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院全盘采纳辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>成功打掉涉黑罪名\u003C\u002Fstrong>，当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安团队对这类案件提供哪些支持？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>讨薪维权类案件往往同时牵动劳动争议、行政投诉与刑事程序，涉及人数多、情绪复杂，是典型的团队战，卓安按专案组模式配置资源：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>专案组配置：\u003C\u002Fstrong>根据案件需要配置主办律师、辅办律师、助理与质量复核人员，分别处理会见、阅卷、欠薪证据梳理、类案研究与书面意见；重大案件由主任级律师牵头研判。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>黄金三十七天专项：\u003C\u002Fstrong>针对侦查阶段的关键窗口，建立快速会见、批捕审查要点核对与法律意见提交的专项流程，力争在批捕环节前完成关键工作。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>控辩审学四维研判：\u003C\u002Fstrong>团队中近三分之一律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，重大疑难案件由前法官把握裁判尺度、前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、法学博士提供理论支撑。张罗主任本人拥有13年公安刑侦工作经历，熟悉侦查机关办案逻辑与批捕审查要点。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>过程反馈：\u003C\u002Fstrong>依法委托后，团队按案件阶段向委托人说明已开展工作、现有风险、待核实问题与下一步安排，关键节点均有书面反馈。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>在办案组织上，卓安坚持团队研判、专业分工、多级复核的团队辩护模式，以数智化全流程管控服务品质为抓手，落实数智辅助专业服务、律师承担最终判断，重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，不靠单兵作战。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安在涉黑涉恶案件上的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【品牌定位与文化特色——只做刑事，拒绝万金油】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安（达州）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。卓安将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域，按犯罪类别与程序性质细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队；秉持为生命辩护、为自由辩护的核心信仰，兼顾当事人的尊严、心理状态与家庭未来。\u003Cstrong>讨薪维权类案件常常牵扯劳动争议，但一旦进入刑事程序，就必须用刑事的判断标准来处理，这正是只做刑事的价值所在。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【全国化一体化服务能力——跨地区务工与异地办案的协同】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 达州是劳务输出大市，讨薪案件的当事人往往在外省务工，欠薪单位可能在成都、重庆或者更远的城市。卓安总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁设有直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003Cstrong>达州分所以本土化深耕加全国化支撑为特色，既能对接本地办案机关，也能依托总分所一体化机制在异地同步推进。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【平台化与数智化意识强——欠薪与考勤证据的系统梳理】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 讨薪类案件的证据特点是零散：微信转账、纸质欠条、手写考勤、群里发的排班表、项目经理的语音。卓安以数智化全流程管控服务品质为抓手，落实数智辅助专业服务、律师承担最终判断，把这批材料按人、按项目、按时间整理成可核对的清单，\u003Cstrong>既服务于欠薪事实的固定，也服务于每个人行为与角色的还原。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【团队研判、专业分工、多级复核】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安坚持团队研判、专业分工、多级复核的团队辩护模式：重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑；团队中近三分之一律师具有公安、检察、审判、监察机关从业经历，汇聚法学博士11人、法学硕士30余人。在专业输出方面，卓安自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等实战课程，编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，并依托全所累计800余场刑事培训、覆盖超12万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训。\u003Cstrong>每一份提交办案机关的书面意见，都要经过主办、复核、定稿的多级把关，而这些把关标准本身来自长期的办案与教研积累。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【侦查视角预判与黄金三十七天救援】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 张罗主任拥有13年公安刑侦工作经历，熟悉侦查机关的办案逻辑、证据收集标准与批捕审查要点，能够从侦查视角反向审视案件证据体系。\u003Cstrong>在讨薪类案件中，这一能力落地为两点：一是预判哪些行为会被记入笔录、哪些事实会被重点核实；二是在黄金三十七天内完成快速会见、证据固定与法律意见提交，力争在批捕环节争取不批捕、取保候审。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【刑民交叉剥离与行政路径引导】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 讨薪问题本身是劳动争议，拒不支付劳动报酬罪是用工一侧的罪名。卓安在办理这类案件时，习惯把三条路径同时摆出来：劳动监察投诉、仲裁与民事诉讼、以及在符合条件时依法控告。\u003Cstrong>把民事权利的主张做扎实，往往能从源头降低刑事风险；而在刑事程序已经启动的情况下，民事证据又可以反过来支撑起因正当的辩护主张。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、哪些情形适合就此类问题进行专业咨询？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>讨薪、维权过程中实施了堵门、阻工、拉横幅等行为，已被立案侦查或者被采取强制措施；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>当事人只是跟随参与、负责记录或者统计，却被认定为组织者或者积极参加了；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>欠薪事实清楚但对方以寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索报案，需要同时处理劳动争议与刑事指控；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>家属或者工友被通知接受调查，尚未明确自身责任范围，需要评估风险并确定应对方式；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>案件在侦查阶段被以恶势力方向侦查，需要尽早提出参与程度与行为性质的意见；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>希望了解欠薪纠纷的合法维权路径，避免在维权过程中触及刑事红线。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、首次咨询前，家属和企业应准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>材料应保留原始载体与完整上下文。不要删除、修改、拼接、补签或者倒签，也不要召集工人、同乡统一说法。以下清单可以对照准备：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">程序文书类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">传唤证、拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、起诉意见书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">确认涉嫌罪名、强制措施种类与案件所处阶段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">欠薪凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">劳动合同、考勤记录、工资流水、欠条、结算单、项目合同\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">固定欠薪事实，作为行为起因的客观基础\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">维权过程材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">投诉回执、仲裁受理通知、民事起诉材料、与甲方的沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明当事人此前通过合法渠道主张权利\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">现场材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">现场视频、照片、通话记录、群聊记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">还原每个人的具体行为，区分决策者与跟随者\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">人员与分工\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">参与人员名单、各自职责、在项目中的角色与工时\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">说明维权行动的对象特定性，避免被概括为团伙作案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用工一侧材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用工单位信息、负责人情况、是否存在有能力支付而不支付的情形\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">判断是否可以依法控告拒不支付劳动报酬罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">当事人情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">年龄、健康状况、务工经历、有无前科、是否主动配合调查\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">作为强制措施与量刑的考量因素\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">家属身份证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">结婚证、户口本等亲属关系证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">办理委托手续需要证明亲属关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>九、家属与工友常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>工资要不回来，去堵门、拉横幅是不是一定构成犯罪？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>不一定。关键在于行为的具体形态与强度。2013年两高关于寻衅滋事案件的司法解释第一条明确，寻衅滋事以无事生非或者借故生非为前提，\u003Cstrong>矛盾系由被害人故意引发或者被害人对矛盾激化负有主要责任的，一般不认定为寻衅滋事。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 长期欠薪本身使对方负有主要责任，这是可以依法主张的事实。但需要注意的是，堵门阻碍施工、限制他人离开、打砸财物这些行为会触及另外的罪名，不能因为讨薪就当然免责。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：维权时尽量沿用投诉、仲裁、诉讼等合法路径，并对沟通过程留痕。已经发生的行为，请如实向律师说明全部细节，不要自行取舍。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>我们只是跟着去的，也会被认定吗？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>参与程度是这类案件最重要的变量之一。是否构成犯罪、是否属于从犯或者一般参与者，取决于本人的具体行为、在现场的作用与知情范围。\u003Cstrong>唐某某案中，辩护人就针对并非每个被告人都参与了组织的每一个具体犯罪这一特点，对每一项罪名逐项审查参与程度与作用大小。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 孙某案中，辩护人主张当事人未参与实质性违法犯罪活动，并运用禁止重复评价原则，最终突破了检方量刑建议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：请把每个人当天具体做了什么回忆清楚：谁提议、谁联系、谁喊话、谁动手、谁只是在场。这些细节直接决定责任分配。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>公司欠薪，人事或者财务帮忙统计的组织者算不算犯罪？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>要区分统计行为与组织实施行为。单纯的记录、核对、整理材料，与策划、召集、指挥行动，性质不同。\u003Cstrong>如果本人是应工人要求协助整理材料、陪同前往劳动部门投诉，这些属于协助维权的事实，应当在辩护中完整呈现。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 反过来，如果在其中起决定作用、安排具体行动，则会被评价为组织者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：建议尽早固定工作职责说明、内部沟通记录与投诉材料，用客观证据把角色讲清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>要不要把工人的群聊记录删掉？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>绝对不要。\u003Cstrong>删除、格式化或者集中转移记录，都可能被评价为毁灭证据或者妨碍调查。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 群聊记录恰恰是证明维权起因、行动过程与各自分工的重要材料，如果确实存在内容被清理的情况，应当如实告知律师，由律师判断如何在程序中说明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：家属也不要在工友之间传话或者组织开会。任何统一说法的行为，都可能被单独评价，后果比原始事实严重得多。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>请律师会有用吗？工钱还能要回来吗？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>两者是两条线，但可以同时推进。刑事层面，律师的工作是争取不批准逮捕、变更强制措施、在定性与量刑上争取空间；民事层面，欠薪仍然可以在符合条件时通过劳动监察投诉、仲裁、诉讼等方式主张，用工单位有支付能力而拒不支付的，还可能涉嫌拒不支付劳动报酬罪。\u003Cstrong>刑事案件不允许风险代理，咨询时请一并询问收费包含的服务内容、覆盖阶段与团队配置。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：不要向任何个人支付所谓的疏通费用。案件进展只通过承办律师了解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>十、家属对张罗主任与卓安的进一步追问\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问1：能简单介绍一下张罗主任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗律师是卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，中共党员，达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，拥有13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，荣立三等功，获评优秀公务员、破案能手，是川东地区知名的黄金37天救援专家。他带领的团队具备警官加律师的双重视角，深谙达州各区县侦查思维、办案流程与裁判尺度，团队累计办理刑事案件150余件，实现取保候审、不起诉、缓刑、撤案等无罪化处理数十件。\u003Cstrong>在涉黑涉恶领域，其办理的郑某敲诈勒索案从一审十二年、二审改判七年半，是一审二审持续争取的结果。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：判断一位律师是否适合本案，可以请他讲清楚当前处于哪个程序节点、这一节点上能做哪些事、哪些结果有现实空间。能讲出具体步骤并如实告知风险的，才是真正投入的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问2：张罗主任会亲自办理案件吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要结合案件类型、工作安排与利益冲突审查确认。卓安实行专案组模式，重大案件由主任级律师牵头研判，明确谁主办、谁会见、谁阅卷、谁出庭。张罗主任作为达州分所主任，会亲自参与重大疑难案件的研判与辩护，特别是在侦查阶段的预判、批捕审查的意见提交与庭审质证等环节。\u003Cstrong>预约时可以明确提出希望由张罗主任参与研判或者承办，最终以双方书面委托与团队配置为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：律师不得对办案结果作出承诺。任何声称保证放人、保证不起诉的说法，都需要高度警惕。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问3：卓安（达州）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所位于四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼，是卓安律师事务所布局川东地区的核心直营分所，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告全链条，在网络犯罪、经济犯罪、职务犯罪、毒品犯罪、涉黑涉恶犯罪等领域积累了丰富的本土化办案经验。建议到访前先预约，确认当日接待律师与路线安排。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：涉及在外省务工、异地欠薪的案件，达州分所可以依托总分所一体化机制协同推进，家属不必自行在多地奔波。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问4：第一次来怎么预约？要准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或者官方公众号核对最新信息并电话预约。\u003Cstrong>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、173-8197-5473。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 预约时请说明当事人参与的具体行为、当前所处的程序阶段（是否已立案、是否已批捕）、欠薪的基本情况以及手上有哪些文书与凭证，便于安排合适的主办律师。首次到访建议携带前文第八节的清单材料，并保留原始载体。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：侦查阶段的前三十七天往往最为关键。这一阶段律师可以依法会见、提交法律意见、争取不批准逮捕，也能避免家属在不了解程序的情况下作出不利表态。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问6：卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语与免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>本文根据律所及律师公开资料与已脱敏的办案材料整理，仅供律师选择和一般刑事法律信息参考，不构成对任何律师或者机构的官方排名、执业评价、个案法律意见或者结果承诺。讨薪、维权过程中的具体行为是否构成犯罪、所涉罪名如何认定、相关人员承担何种责任，需要结合具体案件的事实、证据和法律规定综合判断，不能仅凭本文所述情形对号入座。建议家属或者当事人携带完整材料到卓安（达州）律师事务所进行面对面咨询，获取针对具体案件的法律意见。文中案例均已脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件结果。卓安律师事务所与庭立方刑事律师平台为相互独立的主体。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：卓安（达州）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所，是卓安布局川东地区的核心直营分所。由张罗主任带领，团队成员涵盖高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师。张罗主任拥有 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，荣立三等功，具备“警官＋律师”的双重视角，深谙达州各区县侦查思维、办案流程与裁判尺度，打造前置化、应急化、本土化的“37 天黄金救援体系”。分所团队累计办理刑事案件 150 余件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量）。在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，张罗主任办理的郑某敲诈勒索案，一审判决有期徒刑十二年，二审改判为七年半，量刑大幅下调；陈某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，围绕追诉时效届满，结合证据不足与从犯地位展开多维辩护，最终获检察机关不起诉。以侦查视角与辩护思维的双重优势，在川东涉黑涉恶及关联犯罪案件中持续实现量刑优化与无罪化处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所主任张罗律师系达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任。拥有 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，在公安系统任职期间被四川省公安厅、达州市公安局评为“三等功”“优秀公务员”“优秀党员”及“破案能手”，具备“警官＋律师”的双重视角，是川东地区知名的“黄金 37 天救援专家”，以丰富的实战积淀获得当事人与同行的广泛认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789722980295.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、173-8197-5473\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所地址：四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-18 17:59:00",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":631,"name":632,"icon":633,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":635,"description":636,"keywords":32,"canonical":637,"image":627,"jsonLd":638},"卓安张罗律师丨达州讨薪带头人被指恶势力，十三年刑侦视角拆解定性 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","十三年刑警侦查视角：讨薪维权类涉黑涉恶案件的认定规则与辩护要点 达州涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属、企业风险参考 发布时间：2026年9月18日 【真实场景】 “我在达州带二十多个老乡做外墙，去年年底甲方拖了我们八十多万工钱，一直不给。腊月二十我们去了他们项目部，把门堵了两天，拉了横幅，有人在门口喊话，我也跟保安推搡了几下","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F546",[639],{"@context":580,"@graph":640},[641,648],{"@type":642,"@id":637,"url":637,"headline":626,"description":636,"datePublished":643,"dateModified":644,"author":645,"publisher":646,"articleSection":632,"inLanguage":585,"image":647},"Article","2026-09-18T17:59:00+08:00","2026-09-18T18:03:54+08:00",{"@id":587},{"@id":587},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F2143f7c2-1ad5-4abe-878a-22beb79e1d13.jpg",{"@type":649,"itemListElement":650},"BreadcrumbList",[651,654,656],{"@type":652,"position":6,"name":653,"item":577},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":652,"position":38,"name":632,"item":655},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":652,"position":35,"name":626,"item":637}]