[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-542":622},{"entity":4,"seo":574},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":176,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":238,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":309,"serviceTags":310,"serviceCategories":534,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":551,"homeStats":552,"serviceProducts":564},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,164,168,172],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},315,"X某涉嫌巨额财产来源不明罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻刑","一、案情简介 被告人徐某，系中国XX银行四川省D市市分行党组书记、行长。曾系F市市分行副行长、行长。2006年1月23日因涉嫌犯违法发放贷款罪被四川省公安厅刑事拘留，同年2月23日被逮捕，并由中纪委督办该案。四川省资阳市检察院对徐某等三人提","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},314,"Y某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其成功轻罪辩护","一、抢劫罪及盗窃罪之源头 我的当事人袁某跟很多怀抱梦想的年轻人一样，从四川省的一个小县城来到成都，想实现自己的理想，然而世事多变却让他走上了犯罪的道路。2009年9月26日，袁某与同伙李某共谋在成都某大学门口附近，采用手持石块、语言威胁的方",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},313,"七次共谋参与抢劫达50余万元，团队律师成功为L某辩护，获从轻处罚","一、案情简介 L某、Y某以非法占有为目的，七次共谋采用持刀威胁、实施暴力的方法抢劫出租车，被抢现金及手机等共计价值11000余元，被抢出租车共计价值50余万元 L某、Y某长期在网吧上网，没有经济来源，遂产生抢劫他人财物的念头。2011年7月",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},312,"W某从网友家盗走9800元，控方建议判处有期徒刑二年半，团队律师一番激辩，法庭当庭宣判有期徒刑一年","一、案情简介 2012年11月某日，被告人W某到网友L某的租住房内玩耍，后L某有事外出，W某临时起意，趁机将L某放在家中提包内的现金9800元秘密拿走后逃离。2012年11月28日，W某在Z市被民警挡获，赃款被追回并发还被害人。检方指控，W",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},311,"L某涉嫌滥用职权罪、受贿罪，团队律师为其滥用职权罪做无罪辩护，对受贿罪做罪轻辩护","一、案情简介 （一）2012年，被告人芦某在担任S省XX委员会XX推进处（以下简称省经信委推进处）处长期间，违反S省省级战略性新兴产业发展促进资金（以下简称发展资金）评审规定，帮助不符合评审条件的成都某电子有限责任公司（以下简称甲公司）获取",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},310,"H某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，从第一被告变更为第三被告，获从轻处罚","一、案情简介 H某因与同伙成立“某算力”平台，在经营过程中以为需求客户提供算力为噱头，并以投资虚拟币即有高额回报为诱饵，引诱参加者继续发展他人参加，分级与下线人数较多，具有传销性质。公诉机关指控H某犯组织、领导传销活动罪，涉案金额400万余",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},309,"X某涉嫌妨害信用卡管理罪、帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 向某因涉嫌妨害信用卡管理罪，2019年6月13日被成都市公安局天府新区分局刑事拘留，同年7月19日，经成都市公安局天府新区分局决定取保候审；因涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，于2020年6月10日被利川市公安局刑事拘留，同年7月2",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},308,"Q某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 谢某于2018年10月，虚构某酒店投资项目，通过微信向他人宣传投资可以获得酒店股权，要求参与者缴纳费用获得入股资格，并以发展人数的多少作为计酬或者返利的依据，形成一级返利20%、二级返利10%、三级返利10%的层级组织。谢某直",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},307,"T某涉嫌销售伪劣产品、销售假冒注册商标的商品罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 唐某开了一个干杂店，办案机关在其出租房中查获假烟 1800 余条，货值金额57万余元，查获假酒货值金额18 万余元。检察院以涉嫌销售伪劣产品罪、涉嫌销售假冒注册商标的商品罪两罪起诉至法院。 二、办案过程 卓安团队律师接受委托后",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},306,"Z某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2010年10月29 日张某某因涉嫌诈骗罪被刑事拘留，同年 12 月3日被执行逮捕，羁押于成都市看守所。 二、办案过程 承办律师接到委托后，立即前往看守所会见当事人，了解案件详情，同时承办律师多次与承办检察官、法官就案件存在的",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},305,"L某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其积极辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2012年9月下句，李某向被害人刘某谈称可以帮忙办理施工管理证，骗取人民币5000元，同年 10月15日，李某以同样的方式骗取被害人李某1人民币4000元.同年10月，李某向被害人刘某谎称自己有一个总价2700万元的工程，后以",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},304,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2012 年5月起，被告人邓某为谋取非法利益，纠集被告人曾某等人以伪造的证件承租车辆后予以抵押、出售等方式获利，共骗取受害人车辆六辆，总价值190余万元。 二、办案过程 在曾某被逮捕后，其家属于2012年11月30 日委托了卓",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":10,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},303,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市高新区人民检察院指控廖某某等利用职务上的便利，在多地拆迁补偿过程中，骗取国有财产，应当以贪污罪追究刑事责任。其中廖某某在共同犯罪中起主要作用是主犯，并向高新区人民法院提起诉讼，高新区人民法院于2012年11月开庭审理本案",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":10,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},302,"L某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判  ","一、案情简介 2011年6月12日，被告人李某某在本市某小区车棚内盗走被害人彭某价值人民币2241元的电动车，后被民警抓获归案。 二、办案过程 家属委托后，律师立即会见李某某，安抚其情绪，并询问案件的基本情况，并和办案机关进行了沟通，在对案",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":10,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},301,"Y某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2010年7月被告人杨某某与王某某（已判刑）采用破环手段翻墙进入某公司所有的电信基站，盗得该基站铜芯线、铜鼻、钢排等物，在逃离现场时王某某被护线队员当场挡获。经鉴定涉案铜质电线及钢质配件价值人民币2281元。 二、办案过程 承",[177,182,187,192,195,200,205,211,217],{"id":6,"code":178,"name":179,"summary":180,"keywords":181},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":183,"name":184,"summary":185,"keywords":186},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":188,"name":189,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":193,"keywords":194},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":196,"name":197,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":206,"code":207,"name":208,"summary":209,"keywords":210},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":218,"city":227,"caseType":228,"title":229,"thumbnail":230,"content":10,"publishTime":231,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":232,"lawyers":233,"lawyer":237},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[234],{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[239,242,256,272,291],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":218,"city":227,"caseType":228,"title":229,"thumbnail":230,"content":10,"publishTime":231,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":232,"lawyers":240},[241],{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":243,"createdAt":244,"updatedAt":244,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":212,"city":258,"caseType":259,"title":260,"thumbnail":261,"content":10,"publishTime":262,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":263,"lawyers":264},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[265,268],{"id":212,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":266,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":269,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":270,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":271,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":273,"createdAt":274,"updatedAt":274,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":275,"city":276,"caseType":277,"title":278,"thumbnail":279,"content":10,"publishTime":280,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":281,"lawyers":282},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[283,286],{"id":275,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":284,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":285,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":287,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":289,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":290,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":292,"createdAt":274,"updatedAt":274,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":293,"city":294,"caseType":295,"title":296,"thumbnail":297,"content":10,"publishTime":298,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":299,"lawyers":300},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[301,306],{"id":302,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":303,"position":304,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":305,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":293,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":307,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":308,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[311,320,326,333,340,347,354,360,366,375,382,389,396,403,410,419,426,433,440,446,452,457,463,469,475,481,487,496,503,510,516,522,528],{"id":312,"createdAt":313,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":317,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":302,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":322,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":323,"name":324,"summary":325,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":327,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":332,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":334,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":339,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":341,"createdAt":342,"updatedAt":343,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":344,"name":345,"summary":346,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":348,"createdAt":349,"updatedAt":350,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":351,"name":352,"summary":353,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":355,"updatedAt":356,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":357,"name":358,"summary":359,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":361,"createdAt":362,"updatedAt":362,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":363,"name":364,"summary":365,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":367,"createdAt":368,"updatedAt":369,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":370,"name":371,"summary":372,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":376,"createdAt":377,"updatedAt":378,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":379,"name":380,"summary":381,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":383,"createdAt":384,"updatedAt":385,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":386,"name":387,"summary":388,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":390,"createdAt":391,"updatedAt":392,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":393,"name":394,"summary":395,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":397,"createdAt":398,"updatedAt":399,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":400,"name":401,"summary":402,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":404,"createdAt":405,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":407,"name":408,"summary":409,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":411,"createdAt":412,"updatedAt":413,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":414,"name":415,"summary":416,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":420,"createdAt":421,"updatedAt":422,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":423,"name":424,"summary":425,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":427,"createdAt":428,"updatedAt":429,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":430,"name":431,"summary":432,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":434,"createdAt":435,"updatedAt":436,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":437,"name":438,"summary":439,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":441,"createdAt":442,"updatedAt":442,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":443,"name":444,"summary":445,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":447,"createdAt":448,"updatedAt":448,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":449,"name":450,"summary":451,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":245,"createdAt":453,"updatedAt":453,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":454,"name":455,"summary":456,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":458,"createdAt":459,"updatedAt":459,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":460,"name":461,"summary":462,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":464,"createdAt":465,"updatedAt":465,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":466,"name":467,"summary":468,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":470,"createdAt":471,"updatedAt":471,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":472,"name":473,"summary":474,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":476,"createdAt":477,"updatedAt":477,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":478,"name":479,"summary":480,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":482,"createdAt":483,"updatedAt":483,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":484,"name":485,"summary":486,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":488,"createdAt":489,"updatedAt":490,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":491,"name":492,"summary":493,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":497,"createdAt":498,"updatedAt":499,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":500,"name":501,"summary":502,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":504,"createdAt":505,"updatedAt":506,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":507,"name":508,"summary":509,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":511,"createdAt":512,"updatedAt":512,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":513,"name":514,"summary":515,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":517,"createdAt":518,"updatedAt":518,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":519,"name":520,"summary":521,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":523,"createdAt":524,"updatedAt":524,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":525,"name":526,"summary":527,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":529,"createdAt":530,"updatedAt":530,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":531,"name":532,"summary":533,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[535,539,543,547],{"id":40,"createdAt":536,"updatedAt":537,"deleted":31,"code":494,"name":495,"summary":538,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":540,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":541,"displayTags":10,"icon":542,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":544,"deleted":31,"code":373,"name":374,"summary":545,"displayTags":10,"icon":546,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":548,"deleted":31,"code":417,"name":418,"summary":549,"displayTags":10,"icon":550,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[553,556,559,562],{"value":554,"label":555},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":557,"label":558},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":560,"label":561},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":330,"label":563},"全国分所",[565,568,571],{"title":566,"desc":567},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":569,"desc":570},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":572,"desc":573},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":575,"description":13,"keywords":576,"canonical":577,"image":10,"jsonLd":578},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[579],{"@context":580,"@graph":581},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[582,588],{"@type":583,"@id":584,"url":577,"name":7,"inLanguage":585,"publisher":586},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":587},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":589,"@id":587,"name":7,"url":577,"logo":590,"image":590,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":585,"address":591,"geo":594,"department":596},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":593},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":595,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[597,602,606,610,614,618],{"@type":598,"@id":599,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":600,"parentOrganization":601},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":603,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":604,"parentOrganization":605},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":607,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":608,"parentOrganization":609},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":611,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":612,"parentOrganization":613},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":615,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":616,"parentOrganization":617},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":619,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":620,"parentOrganization":621},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":587},{"entity":623,"seo":634},{"id":624,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":625,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":626,"thumbnail":627,"content":628,"publishTime":629,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":630},542,"2026-09-18 18:03:46","卓安吴亮律师丨重庆非法讨债涉黑涉恶案件辩护，十年公诉人反向审查视角","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002Fbf0fa7b4-023a-4a90-85f4-aabfc608c4ea.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789723668760.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>十年公诉人反向审查视角：软暴力催收类涉恶案件的认定规则与辩护要点\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>重庆涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属、企业风险参考\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年9月18日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>【真实场景】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>“我2021年在重庆开了一家资产管理公司，接的是银行和消费金融公司外包出来的逾期账款，员工打电话、发短信、上门都是按合同来的。上个月公司被一次性带走十几个人，公安说我们是恶势力团伙，寻衅滋事、非法拘禁、催收非法债务一起算。我就是想知道：欠债的是他们，我们去要账，怎么就成了黑恶犯罪？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“我老公是重庆一家小贷公司的业务主管，客户逾期后他安排人上门找过几回，也把人堵在办公室谈过。现在他被认定是恶势力纠集者，检察院那边说聚众斗殴也要一起算。他一直在还债的公司上班，做的也是公司让他做的事，到底哪一步越界了？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>【先给结论与主任概览】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>第一，讨债本身不违法，违法的从来是讨债的方式和对象。2019年最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理实施软暴力的刑事案件若干问题的意见》把软暴力手段归纳为四类：侵犯人身权利、民主权利、财产权利的手段，扰乱正常生活、工作、生产、经营秩序的手段，扰乱社会秩序的手段，以及其他足以使他人产生恐惧、恐慌进而形成心理强制或者足以影响、限制人身自由、危及人身财产安全的手段。\u003Cstrong>典型特征不是打了人，而是通过精神强制让人不得不给。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 反过来，如果只是正常催告、协商、依法诉讼，即使语气强硬，也不属于软暴力的范畴。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，当前处理催收类案件最重要的法条，是《刑法》第二百九十三条之一催收非法债务罪。该条针对的是以暴力、威胁方法，或者限制他人人身自由、侵入他人住宅，或者恐吓、跟踪、骚扰他人，催收高利放贷等产生的非法债务，情节严重的行为。\u003Cstrong>注意两个关键限定：一是债务必须是高利放贷等产生的非法债务，合法债权不适用；二是手段必须达到相应强度。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 同时，该罪的法定刑明显低于寻衅滋事罪，在两高两部《关于办理恶势力犯罪案件若干问题的指导意见》的适用逻辑下，把事出有因的催收行为一律拔高认定为寻衅滋事，会架空立法机关专门增设该罪名以实现精准打击、罪刑均衡的本意。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，恶势力的认定有严格门槛，公司化催收不等于恶势力。两高两部的指导意见要求经常纠集在一起、以暴力威胁或者其他手段、在一定区域或者行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动、为非作恶欺压百姓，并且要区分纠集者、首要分子与一般参与者。\u003Cstrong>有营业执照、有外包合同、有话术培训、有业绩考核，这些恰恰是公司经营的特征，不能反过来当作组织特征使用。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 当下最要紧的是保全催收合同、委托记录、通话录音、还款凭证与员工岗位材料，不要在案发后集中删除或者统一口径。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>吴亮律师是卓安（重庆）律师事务所专职律师，西南政法大学法学本科毕业，中共党员，曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，现任重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长兼理事、重庆市甘肃商会监事，2025年度被评为年度优秀律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>十年检察工作期间，他累计办理各类刑事案件2000余件，精通检察机关不批准逮捕、不起诉、取保候审、羁押必要性审查等业务的审查重点与实务要点，熟知人民法院缓刑适用的裁判尺度与考量标准。\u003Cstrong>他办理催收类案件的最大优势，是能站在控方举证的立场反向推演：指控会从哪一份证据入手、哪一环的证据链最容易断。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 转型执业律师后，他主攻涉企犯罪辩护、职务犯罪辩护、刑民交叉类案件，尤其擅长涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护、经济犯罪辩护与网络犯罪辩护，曾主办重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、为什么软暴力催收会成为本轮扫黑除恶的重点？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>先看政策脉络。2021年施行的《反有组织犯罪法》在总结既有司法实践的基础上，把经常纠集在一起、以暴力威胁或者其他手段、在一定区域或者行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动的组织形态纳入规范；对利用信息网络实施的有组织犯罪也作了专门规定。\u003Cstrong>催收与反催收，正好处在金融不良资产处置与民间借贷两端压力最大的位置，因此成为执法重点并不意外。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>再看行为形态。催收类案件的指控行为通常集中在几个动作上：高频拨打电话与发送短信、上门找人、在单位或者住所停留、向债务人以外的第三人披露债务信息、在网络上发布欠款信息、限制离开、拿走财物抵偿。这些动作在法律上的评价差异极大——\u003Cstrong>高频联系可能被评价为骚扰，上门可能被评价为侵入住宅，向第三人披露可能被评价为侵犯公民个人信息，限制离开则可能被评价为非法拘禁。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>接着看罪名群。这类案件的指控通常不止一个罪名，而是敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事、非法拘禁、催收非法债务、强迫交易、侵犯公民个人信息、非法经营等罪名的组合，再叠加恶势力认定。\u003Cstrong>罪名越多，越要逐项核对：每一项指控对应的事实是什么，证据来源是什么，是否已经与其他罪名重复评价。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>最后看边界。辩护上真正有效的路径，通常不是笼统地说我们没干，而是三条具体的线：债务的性质是合法还是非法，催收的手段是否达到法定强度，当事人在其中的角色是决策、组织还是执行。\u003Cstrong>这三条线画清楚了，案件的定性、量刑和财产处置都会跟着改变。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、这类案件为什么难？四个难点必须面对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一个难点：合法债权与非法债务往往混在同一家公司、同一批业务里。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一家催收公司可能同时承接银行信用卡、消费金融公司的委托业务，也可能承接来源不明的高息借贷。会计上它们都在一张表里，法律上却是两条完全不同的线。\u003Cstrong>能否把合法债权对应的催收行为从非法债务中剥离出来，直接决定当事人是被认定为主犯还是一般参与者。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这需要按笔核对委托合同、放款流水、还款记录与佣金结算。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二个难点：软暴力的证据以被害人陈述和录音为主，印证关系容易被放大。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>软暴力案件很少留下伤情鉴定这类客观证据，主要依靠被害人陈述、同案供述、通话录音与聊天记录。被害人处于债务压力下，陈述往往带有情绪；同案人员为了自保，也可能把责任推给上级。\u003Cstrong>逐份比对陈述的时间、地点、人物与细节，找出彼此矛盾之处，是这类案件最常见的突破口。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三个难点：恶势力认定中的多次与行业区域要件，容易被笼统概括。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>多次违法犯罪活动应当逐次核实，是否构成违法犯罪、是否已被其他罪名评价、时间跨度多长，都影响认定。公司在全国范围内承接业务，也不等于在某一区域或者行业形成了控制。\u003Cstrong>把多次拆成一次次具体事件来检验，比在整体上争论是否欺压百姓更有效。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四个难点：罪名的竞合与重复评价问题。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>催收行为可能同时落入催收非法债务罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪的构成要件。辩护上应当提出法条包容性竞合的判断，主张按更能体现行为本质、法定刑更相适应的罪名评价，并防止同一行为在涉黑涉恶认定与个罪认定中被重复计算。\u003Cstrong>杨某案的实践说明，这一路径在审查起诉阶段就能产生实质效果。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、吴亮律师团队会怎样推进催收类案件的辩护？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>这类案件的辩护是一套按债务穿透、罪名拆解、角色定位、金额核对、节点沟通、家属反馈推进的系统工作。结合卓安的团队配置与办案模式，具体操作如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>债务穿透：按笔核对委托合同、放款流水、计息方式、还款记录与佣金结算，把合法债权、高利放贷形成的非法债务与其他来源债务分类列表。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>罪名拆解：对每一项指控罪名，核对构成要件与在案证据的对应关系，判断是否存在法条竞合、能否向法定刑更相适应的罪名迁移。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>角色定位：区分决策者、组织者、班组长与一线话务员，把每个人的具体行为、知情范围与获利情况列成清单，防止以公司整体行为替代个人责任评价。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>证据审查：对通话录音、短信、聊天记录、上门视频、定位数据，审查取得方式与完整性；对被害人陈述与同案供述的时间、细节逐份比对。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>节点沟通：在侦查、审查逮捕、审查起诉各阶段依法提交书面法律意见，争取不批准逮捕、变更强制措施与不起诉空间。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>家属反馈：按阶段说明已开展工作、现有风险、待核实问题与下一步安排，避免家属在多方信息中作出错误判断。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>具体到催收类案件，卓安把债务性质分层、催收行为强度评估、罪名竞合选择、多层级作用力拆解等方法融入每一个环节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、卓安涉黑涉恶案例能说明哪些辩护路径？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案——资金穿透与组织特征认定，从公诉视角反向审查指控体系】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 该案系吴亮律师主办的重大涉黑涉恶案件，涉案人员众多、资金链条长、法律关系复杂，套路贷型经营模式与涉黑涉恶定性相互交叉，指控体系庞大。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安吴亮律师以其十年审查起诉与批捕审查经验，从控方举证的角度反向梳理：一是资金穿透，核对每一笔放款、计息、催收与回款的真实路径，厘清债权的真伪与性质；二是组织特征审查，逐个检验成员之间是否存在稳定的组织、纪律与分工，防止把业务协作拔高为组织关系；三是逐项拆解个罪指控的证据标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 套路贷类案件的核心争点有两个：一是债务是否真实存在、是否属于以非法占有为目的虚增，二是催收行为与债务基础是否对应。把这两点讲清楚，就能把整体性的涉黑涉恶指控还原成可以被逐项检验的事实。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 该案的办理使其在套路贷型涉黑涉恶案件的资金穿透与组织特征认定上形成了系统的实务积累。\u003Cstrong>具体案件信息以办案机关文书与正式委托后的专业判断为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：重庆市永川区范某某涉黑案——严打高压背景下，最大限度从宽裁判】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 范某某被认定为黑社会性质组织的组织者、领导者，被指控构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队对黑社会性质组织的各项特征进行精细化拆解，从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性三个维度展开质证与逻辑推演，主张部分个罪证据不足。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 组织特征的认定要看有没有稳定的组织结构与内部纪律，经济特征要看利益是否归组织而非个人，危害性特征要看影响是否及于一定区域或者行业。三个维度只要有一个立不住，定性就有松动空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在严打高压背景下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，\u003Cstrong>采纳相关辩护意见，作出最大限度从宽的裁判，有效降低了量刑幅度\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：杨某恶势力团伙催收非法债务案——审查起诉阶段打掉聚众斗殴罪，数罪并罚仅执行五年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 杨某在当地经营小额贷款公司，在收取贷款过程中与部分逾期客户发生冲突，对部分长期坏账客户采取限制人身自由、恐吓等方式，此外还被指控牵涉当地多起打架斗殴事件，被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队分两阶段推进。审查起诉阶段针对面临刑罚最重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致证据比对与质证，出具专门法律意见书，成功促使检察院撤回该项起诉；审判阶段邀请刑法专家论证法条竞合，提出刑法修正案（十一）新增的催收非法债务罪与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪存在法条包容性竞合，依催收非法债务罪定罪更符合罪责刑相适应原则——\u003Cstrong>催收行为事出有因、存在债务前提，被告人没有无事生非、扰乱社会公共秩序的主观动机，被害人往往存在违约过错，客观上并未对特定债务人之外的社会公众造成严重影响。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一案把催收类案件的两条主线走通了：前端在审查起诉阶段阻击最重的罪名，后端在审判阶段用轻罪的立法本意化解法条竞合，同时反对把民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用更为严苛的重罪重罚，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债涉网络寻衅滋事案——跨省追究下企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 广东某企业家组织公司为金融机构开展追债业务，被跨省追究涉嫌网络寻衅滋事罪，法定量刑在五年以上，公司多名员工同时被卷入。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队从债权真实来源、委托关系合法性、追债行为的具体方式与网络寻衅滋事罪的构成要件逐项切入，并对每一名员工的知晓范围、参与环节与获利情况分别提出意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 债权真实、委托合法，是这类案件最重要的辩护基础。在此基础上，员工的责任必须与本人的知情和参与程度对应，不能以公司整体行为替代个人责任评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 经团队有效辩护，\u003Cstrong>企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>。该案由卓安律师团队承办，是总分所协同办理跨省催收类案件的业绩记录之一。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：董某涉黑四罪案——围堵工厂索要工程款，剥离敲诈勒索重罪指控】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 检察机关指控董某参与以杜某为核心的黑社会性质组织、非法从事房屋拆迁和土建行业并系骨干成员，指控事实包括因认定施工亏本而围堵工厂、拉闸断电，为取得土建挖方工程纠集四十余人打砸工地，以及竞标失败后强行索要赔偿等，案卷材料上千页。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队从上千页案卷中深挖有利证据：一是论证案涉团伙人员关系松散，缺乏明确分工与帮规帮纪，不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征；二是\u003Cstrong>论证索要的是被拖欠的工程款、目的具有合法性，主观上没有非法占有他人财产的目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件\u003C\u002Fstrong>；三是提出寻衅滋事部分系起次要、辅助作用的从犯。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 索款行为的正当性来自付款义务本身。只要能证明债权真实存在，手段过激与非法占有就是两个必须分开评价的问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 起诉书原指控敲诈勒索数额巨大、任意毁坏公私财物情节严重，经律师团队提交详实辩护词并据理力争，一审法院判决\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚，最终从轻决定执行有期徒刑十一年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：H某涉黑降格为恶势力犯罪集团案——两项罪名脱罪，量刑从十年以上降至八年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> H某被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等罪名。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队以当事人资金独立、行为自主、不存在豢养成员的证据，\u003Cstrong>彻底推翻控方关于黑社会性质组织四个特征的认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 涉黑与涉恶的分界，集中在经济特征与危害性特征。把资金流向、收入归属与行为的自主性讲清楚，定性就有降维的空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件定性由黑社会性质组织\u003Cstrong>降格为恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Fstrong>，非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项指控未被法院认定，\u003Cstrong>量刑从十年以上降至有期徒刑八年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 7：陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案——全案摘掉涉黑帽子，仅因普通轻微犯罪判一年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 陈某被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等罪名，团伙成员多为同学、老乡。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队\u003Cstrong>精准击破组织特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>：指出该团伙系同学、老乡基于哥们义气形成的松散社交关系，缺乏明确的帮规帮纪与经济管控，坚决作不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依据《刑法》第二百九十四条，缺乏纪律规约、人员松散的普通犯罪团伙，难以被评价为黑社会性质组织。组织特征的缺失，是出罪辩护最应抓住的着力点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院全盘采纳辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>成功打掉涉黑罪名\u003C\u002Fstrong>，当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安团队对这类案件提供哪些支持？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>催收类涉恶案件涉及银行、消费金融、小贷、外包服务等多方主体，是典型的团队战，卓安按专案组模式配置资源：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>专案组配置：\u003C\u002Fstrong>根据案件需要配置主办律师、辅办律师、助理与质量复核人员，分别处理会见、阅卷、债务核对、类案研究与书面意见；重大案件由主任级律师牵头研判。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>债务与行为双专项：\u003C\u002Fstrong>一条线核对债务性质与资金流向，另一条线评估催收行为的具体方式与强度，两条线交叉形成辩护意见与证据索引。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>控辩审学四维研判：\u003C\u002Fstrong>团队中近三分之一律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，重大疑难案件由前法官把握裁判尺度、前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、法学博士提供理论支撑。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>过程反馈：\u003C\u002Fstrong>依法委托后，团队按案件阶段向委托人说明已开展工作、现有风险、待核实问题与下一步安排，关键节点均有书面反馈。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>在办案组织上，卓安坚持团队研判、专业分工、多级复核的团队辩护模式，以数智化全流程管控服务品质为抓手，落实数智辅助专业服务、律师承担最终判断，重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，不靠单兵作战。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安在涉黑涉恶案件上的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【品牌定位与文化特色——只做刑事，拒绝万金油】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安（重庆）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。卓安将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域，按犯罪类别与程序性质细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队；秉持为生命辩护、为自由辩护的核心信仰，兼顾当事人的尊严、心理状态与家庭未来。\u003Cstrong>催收类案件横跨民间借贷、金融服务与刑事犯罪，最需要的是只做刑事的判断力，而不是什么都做的宽泛经验。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【全国化一体化服务能力——应对跨区域资产处置与催收链条】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 不良资产处置与催收业务天然跨区域：委托方在总部城市，债务人与催收行为分散在多个省市。卓安总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁设有直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003Cstrong>重庆分所立足重庆、辐射川渝，可以依托总分所一体化机制，与行为地、债务人所在地分所同步推进会见、阅卷与沟通，把跨省案件的程序节点统一编排。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【平台化与数智化意识强——资金与电子数据审查】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 催收类案件的核心证据是资金流水与通讯数据。卓安以数智化全流程管控服务品质为抓手，落实数智辅助专业服务、律师承担最终判断，在资金穿透与电子数据审查上形成了标准化方法：按笔核对放款、计息、催收与回款路径，还原通话与短信的完整上下文，审查录音与聊天记录的取得方式与完整性。\u003Cstrong>数据交给工具处理，法律判断由律师负责。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【团队研判、专业分工、多级复核】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安坚持团队研判、专业分工、多级复核的团队辩护模式：重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑；团队中近三分之一律师具有公安、检察、审判、监察机关从业经历，汇聚法学博士11人、法学硕士30余人。在专业输出方面，卓安自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等实战课程，编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，并依托全所累计800余场刑事培训、覆盖超12万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训。\u003Cstrong>每一份提交办案机关的书面意见，都要经过主办、复核、定稿的多级把关，而这些把关标准本身来自长期的办案与教研积累。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【公诉视角反向审查与催收行为强度分层】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 吴亮律师的十年批捕与审查起诉经历，使团队习惯从控方的举证顺序出发推演辩护：\u003Cstrong>先问这个案子在审查逮捕阶段会被抓哪几个点，再问这几个点上的证据链哪里最容易断。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在催收类案件中，这一视角具体落地为催收行为强度分层——正常催告、言语施压、高频骚扰、上门滞留、限制人身自由分别对应不同的法律评价，不把它们笼统打包成一个恶字。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【刑事全生命周期服务意识】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安把刑事服务贯穿风险发生前后：事前帮助企业梳理外包催收合同的合规边界、话术审核与员工行为规范；事中在约谈、调查、立案初期协助固定有利证据、依法应对；事后在诉讼阶段承接辩护并与合规整改衔接。\u003Cstrong>对催收行业而言，最好的结果是业务整改到位、风险挡在立案之前；退一步，也要在强制措施、定罪定性与财产处置上守住空间。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、哪些情形适合就此类问题进行专业咨询？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>催收公司、小贷公司、资产管理公司被整体立案侦查，员工被通知接受调查或者已被采取强制措施；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>当事人被认定为恶势力纠集者或者首要分子，但家属认为其仅负责某一环节或者仅执行公司安排；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>合法债权催收与非法债务催收混在同一批业务中，需要按笔区分债务性质；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>同一组催收行为被同时指控催收非法债务罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等多个罪名，涉及罪名竞合与量刑档次；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>案件主要依靠被害人陈述、通话录音与同案供述认定，家属怀疑存在陈述矛盾、录音不完整的情形；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>公司账户与个人财产被查封、冻结，需要评估合法财产能否从涉案财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、首次咨询前，家属和企业应准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>材料应保留原始载体与完整上下文。不要删除、修改、拼接、补签或者倒签，也不要联系债务人、同案人员统一说法。以下清单可以对照准备：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">程序文书类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、传唤证、起诉意见书、查封冻结清单\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">确认涉嫌罪名、强制措施种类与案件所处阶段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">债务基础材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">委托催收合同、放款流水、借据、计息方式、还款记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">判断债务性质是合法债权还是高利放贷等形成的非法债务\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">业务流程材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">话术本、培训记录、派单表、绩效考核与佣金结算表\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">说明公司经营属性，区分公司行为与个人行为\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">催收行为证据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">通话录音、短信与聊天记录、上门视频、定位记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">评估催收方式的具体强度，核对被害人陈述的细节\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">人员与角色材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">员工名册、岗位职责、入职时间、工资与提成构成\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">区分决策者、组织者与一线执行人员\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">财产材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">公司与个人账户清单、房产车辆凭证、合法收入凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用于涉案财产范围认定与合法财产剥离\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">当事人情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">年龄、健康状况、有无前科、是否主动配合调查\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">作为强制措施与量刑的考量因素\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">家属身份证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">结婚证、户口本等亲属关系证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">办理委托手续需要证明亲属关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>九、家属与企业负责人常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>欠债的是他们，我们去催收，怎么会变成犯罪？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>催收行为本身是民事权利的实现方式，法律并不禁止。真正被评价的是方式与强度：是否使用暴力、威胁，是否限制人身自由、侵入住宅，是否通过恐吓、跟踪、骚扰使人产生恐惧。此外还要看债务的性质——\u003Cstrong>《刑法》第二百九十三条之一催收非法债务罪明确限于催收高利放贷等产生的非法债务，合法债权不适用该罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 所以案件的第一步，通常是先把每一笔债权的性质核对清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：涉案的催收合同、放款凭证与还款记录，是这一判断的基础材料，请务必保全原始版本，不要自行整理成新的表格替代原件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>公司有营业执照、有外包合同，为什么还被认定恶势力？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>公司化经营与恶势力认定并不矛盾，但也不等同。恶势力要求经常纠集在一起、以暴力威胁或者其他手段、在一定区域或者行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动。\u003Cstrong>营业执照只能证明经营形式合法，不能直接排除对具体行为的评价；反过来，有营业执照也不能成为认定组织特征的依据。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 实践中，辩护的重点是把多次违法犯罪逐次核实，把公司经营行为与个别人员的越界行为分开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：杨某案、H某案的实践说明，把行为人从组织评价中剥离出来，或者把定性由涉黑降为涉恶，都是现实存在的辩护空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>我只是小组长或者话务员，责任会轻一些吗？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>角色是这类案件最重要的变量之一。是否构成犯罪、构成什么罪、有没有从犯情节，取决于本人是否知道业务的违法性质、是否参与核心环节、是否分得主要利益。\u003Cstrong>孙某等45人特大涉黑案中，辩护人就主张当事人未参与组织的实质性违法犯罪活动、不应被认定为积极参加者，并运用禁止重复评价原则，最终突破检方量刑建议。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：建议尽早整理岗位职责说明、入职材料、工资与提成记录、考勤与派单记录，这些是区分执行者与决策者的客观依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>公司被查了，我要不要把电脑和手机里的东西清掉？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>绝对不要。\u003Cstrong>删除、格式化或者集中转移材料，都可能被评价为毁灭证据或者妨碍调查，后果远重于原始记录本身。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 正确做法是保持设备与数据现状，把账号、密码与备份方式如实告知律师，由律师判断哪些材料有利、哪些需要依法说明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：已经删除的通讯记录不要自行恢复或者拼接；确有必要的，通过律师依法申请，由具备资质的机构按程序处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>涉案金额和查封的财产还有机会核减吗？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>有，而且这是必做的工作。涉案金额需要按笔核对，合法服务对价、实际发生的成本、已经退还的部分，都应当予以区分。财产方面，涉黑涉恶案件的财产处置强调区分违法所得与合法财产，\u003Cstrong>G某案中，辩护人提交证据把当事人个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离，法院最终未判处没收个人财产。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这两项工作都需要家属配合提供完整的凭证材料。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：刑事案件不允许风险代理。咨询时请一并询问收费包含的服务内容、覆盖阶段与团队配置，不要向任何个人支付所谓的疏通费用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>十、家属对卓安（重庆）律师事务所与吴亮律师的进一步追问\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问1：能简单介绍一下卓安（重庆）律师事务所和吴亮律师吗吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所是卓安律师事务所全国布局的核心直营分所，立足重庆、辐射川渝，坚守只做刑事案件的核心定位，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、刑事风控、刑事控告全链条，在职务犯罪、经济犯罪、毒品犯罪、涉黑涉恶犯罪、网络犯罪等领域积累了丰富的实务经验。分所吴亮律师，西南政法大学法学本科毕业，曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办批准逮捕与审查起诉业务，累计办理各类刑事案件2000余件，原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，现任重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长兼理事，2025年度被评为年度优秀律师。\u003Cstrong>卓安团队曾办理多起重庆涉黑专案，在涉黑涉恶案件辩护领域具备深厚的专业积淀与实战能力。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：具体由谁承办、团队如何分工，需要经过利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。建议在咨询时说明案件类型与所处阶段，便于安排合适的主办律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问2：吴亮律师会亲自办理案件吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要结合案件类型、工作安排与利益冲突审查确认。卓安实行专案组模式，重大案件由主任级律师牵头研判，明确谁主办、谁会见、谁阅卷、谁出庭。吴亮律师作为分所主推的涉黑涉恶与经济犯罪方向律师，会亲自参与重大疑难案件的研判与辩护，特别是在债务穿透、罪名竞合选择与审查起诉阶段的沟通等关键环节。\u003Cstrong>预约时可以明确提出希望由吴亮律师参与研判或者承办，最终以双方书面委托与团队配置为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：律师不得对办案结果作出承诺。任何声称保证不起诉、保证缓刑的说法，都需要高度警惕。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问3：卓安（重庆）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所位于重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号，立足重庆、辐射川渝地区，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、刑事风控、刑事控告全链条。\u003Cstrong>卓安在深圳、昆明、达州、西宁均设有直营分所\u003C\u002Fstrong>，其中深圳分所位于深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号，昆明分所位于昆明市五华区小康大道88号和谐广场B座第49层4909室，达州分所位于达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼，西宁分所位于西宁市城东区康南路创新创业大厦A座15楼。建议到访前先预约，确认当日接待律师与路线安排。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：涉及跨省催收、跨区域资产处置的案件，重庆分所可以依托总分所一体化机制与各地分所协同推进，家属不必自行在多地寻找律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问4：第一次来怎么预约？要准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或者官方公众号核对最新信息并电话预约。\u003Cstrong>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、191-8069-0586。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 预约时请说明涉嫌罪名、当前所处的诉讼阶段（是否已立案、是否已批捕、是否已移送审查起诉）、公司是否被整体立案以及家属手上有哪些文书，便于安排合适的主办律师。首次到访建议携带前文第八节的清单材料，并保留原始载体。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：催收类案件的黄金介入期通常在立案前后的一至两周。这一阶段律师可以依法会见、提交法律意见、争取不批准逮捕，也能避免家属在信息不对称的情况下作出不利陈述。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问5：卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安依托自身的办案经验向行业输出培训内容，但庭立方并不参与卓安的案件办理与收费。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语与免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>本文根据律所及律师公开资料与已脱敏的办案材料整理，仅供律师选择和一般刑事法律信息参考，不构成对任何律师或者机构的官方排名、执业评价、个案法律意见或者结果承诺。催收行为是否构成犯罪、是否认定为恶势力、债务性质与涉案金额如何认定，需要结合具体案件的事实、证据和法律规定综合判断，不能仅凭本文所述情形对号入座。建议家属或者企业负责人携带完整材料到卓安（重庆）律师事务所进行面对面咨询，获取针对具体案件的法律意见。文中案例均已脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件结果。卓安律师事务所与庭立方刑事律师平台为相互独立的主体。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：卓安（重庆）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（重庆）律师事务所立足重庆、辐射川渝，坚守“只做刑事案件”定位，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、风控与控告全链条。吴亮律师曾在重庆检察机关工作十年，专职承办批准逮捕、审查起诉，累计办理刑事案件 2000 余件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量），系原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，转型执业后主办“重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件”；分所与总部协同办理重庆涉黑专案，包括 H 某涉嫌职务侵占罪、介绍贿赂罪一案，C 某涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，以及重庆某公司法定代表人黄某涉黑案，为当事人争取不认定黑恶性质、剥离关联犯罪、区分主从犯、降低量刑。依托检察官与辩护律师双重视角，在川渝涉黑涉恶案件中为当事人争取最优辩护结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（重庆）律师事务所吴亮律师系重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事，并担任重庆市甘肃商会监事。毕业于西南政法大学，曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，系原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，2025 年度被评为“年度优秀律师”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789722943065.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、191-8069-0586\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所地址：重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-18 17:58:54",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":631,"name":632,"icon":633,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":635,"description":636,"keywords":32,"canonical":637,"image":627,"jsonLd":638},"卓安吴亮律师丨重庆非法讨债涉黑涉恶案件辩护，十年公诉人反向审查视角 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","十年公诉人反向审查视角：软暴力催收类涉恶案件的认定规则与辩护要点 重庆涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属、企业风险参考 发布时间：2026年9月18日 【真实场景】 “我2021年在重庆开了一家资产管理公司，接的是银行和消费金融公司外包出来的逾期账款，员工打电话、发短信、上门都是按合同来的。上个月公司被一次性带走十几个人，公安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F542",[639],{"@context":580,"@graph":640},[641,648],{"@type":642,"@id":637,"url":637,"headline":626,"description":636,"datePublished":643,"dateModified":644,"author":645,"publisher":646,"articleSection":632,"inLanguage":585,"image":647},"Article","2026-09-18T17:58:54+08:00","2026-09-18T18:03:46+08:00",{"@id":587},{"@id":587},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002Fbf0fa7b4-023a-4a90-85f4-aabfc608c4ea.jpg",{"@type":649,"itemListElement":650},"BreadcrumbList",[651,654,656],{"@type":652,"position":6,"name":653,"item":577},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":652,"position":38,"name":632,"item":655},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":652,"position":35,"name":626,"item":637}]