[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-540":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},540,"2026-09-18 18:03:36","卓安任忠孙律师丨深圳跨境电商被指网络黑恶涉恶，舆情敲诈与正当维权如何区分？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002Fedb2c6e6-77e1-41cb-bb06-30fd0dca34e4.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789723668760.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二十年大要案刑辩视角：网络黑恶案件的证据审查与辩护要点\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深圳涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属、企业风险参考\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年9月18日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>【真实场景】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>“我公司在深圳做跨境电商，去年跟一家代运营公司闹翻，对方在几个平台连着发黑稿，还组织人到我们直播间刷屏、集体投诉。今年我这边也找了自媒体回击，结果对方报警，说我们组织网络水军实施敲诈，我和运营总监都被约谈问话。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“我弟弟在一家催收工作室上班，公司给网贷平台做电话提醒，用的都是公司统一发的话术本。现在整个工作室被定性成恶势力团伙，他被指控寻衅滋事。可他就是个打电话的，按本子念话术，这也算涉黑涉恶吗？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>【先给结论与主任概览】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>第一，网络不是法外之地，但在网上本身不是定罪理由。《反有组织犯罪法》第二条对恶势力组织的界定，强调经常纠集在一起、以暴力威胁或者其他手段、在一定区域或者行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动；《刑法》第二百九十四条则要求黑社会性质组织同时具备组织特征、经济特征、行为特征和危害性特征。2019年最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理利用信息网络实施黑恶势力犯罪刑事案件的意见》明确，利用信息网络实施违法犯罪、符合上述标准的应当依法认定；同时要求严格把握认定条件，准确区分违法犯罪与正常经营、民事纠纷的界限。\u003Cstrong>上网改变的是行为的实施方式与证据形态，不会自动降低或提高入罪门槛。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这是全部辩护的起点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，绝大多数网络敲诈类指控，真正的战场是罪名，而不是有没有做。同一笔钱，可能是索要合法债权的对价，可能是正常的舆论服务费用，也可能是以曝光相要挟的封口费。《刑法》第二百七十四条敲诈勒索罪要求以非法占有为目的；第二百二十六条强迫交易罪要求以暴力、威胁手段强买强卖商品、强迫他人提供或者接受服务；第二百九十三条寻衅滋事罪中的强拿硬要，要求无事生非、破坏社会秩序。\u003Cstrong>定性错一格，量刑差几年。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 把每一笔款项的依据逐笔还原，通常比单纯争辩手段是否过激更有价值。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，这类案件里最危险的动作，往往发生在立案之前和立案后的第一周。指控体系通常由聊天记录、转账凭证、话术本、任务派单表、群聊与通话记录搭建起来，一旦删除、拼接、补签、倒签，就可能从民事纠纷演变为毁灭证据甚至串供问题。\u003Cstrong>当下最该做的三件事是：保全原始载体，把个人行为与公司行为分开梳理，尽快委托熟悉网络证据与涉黑涉恶认定规则的律师。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>任忠孙律师是卓安（深圳）律师事务所创始人、主任，深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任，广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任，深圳市人民检察院听证员，深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师。他曾在教育及党政部门担任副处级领导职务，2005年起专职从事刑事法律服务，深耕刑事领域二十余年，办理及指导刑事案件超1000件，承办多起公安部督办大要案，多个案件入选省、市经典案例及全国无罪辩护案例。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在网络黑恶与涉黑涉恶辩护这条线上，他的经验来自两类案件：一类是沙井龙哥涉黑案那样的传统涉黑大案——该案号称深圳建市以来最大涉黑恶案件，他为被指控为骨干组织者的当事人辩护，硬生生将组织者定性改为参与者，并打掉了故意杀人罪的指控；另一类是广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债业务被跨省追究涉网络寻衅滋事案——法定量刑在五年以上，经团队有效辩护，企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉。\u003Cstrong>把网络行为从组织犯罪里拆出来，再把个人责任从公司行为里拆出来，是他处理这类案件的惯常路径。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、网络黑恶案件里，为什么边界必须先划清？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>先要理解网络黑恶是怎么被认定的。它并不是一个新罪名，而是黑社会性质组织罪、恶势力犯罪，与敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事、强迫交易、非法经营等具体罪名在互联网场景下的组合。\u003Cstrong>指控的落点最终仍然是刑法上那几个传统罪名\u003C\u002Fstrong>，只是行为发生在线上、证据以电子数据为主。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>网络场景会带来三个变化。一是行为的组织化更容易被呈现：群聊、任务表、话术本、分成记录天然记录了分工与协作，控方取证的难度下降了。二是影响扩散更快：同一篇稿件、同一条短视频可能带来跨地域的后果，容易被评价为严重破坏经济、社会生活秩序。三是证据几乎全部是电子数据：手机、电脑、云端的提取过程是否合法、是否完整，直接影响能否采信。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对当事人和家属来说，这意味着三件事必须尽早分开：\u003Cstrong>第一，是正常商业竞争与民事债权纠纷，还是刑事犯罪；第二，是个人行为，还是公司行为；第三，如果是公司行为，当事人是决策者、执行者，还是仅按指令操作的一线员工。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这三个问题想清楚了，辩护才有骨架。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>反过来，如果一上来只强调我们也是受害者、网上说得难听而已，反而会把最需要争的定性问题让给控方。实务中，很多网络黑恶指控的最终处理结果，恰恰取决于立案初期当事人和家属有没有把材料留住、把话说清楚、把角色分清。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、这类案件为什么难？四个难点必须面对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一个难点：网络行为与黑恶组织之间，是否存在真实的组织关系。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一家公司有话术本、有话术培训、有业绩考核，这些在正常经营中普遍存在。控方容易据此推断有组织、有分工、有纪律，进而套用黑社会性质组织的组织特征。但经营分工不等于组织分工，业绩考核不等于帮规帮纪，公司收益也不等于组织利益。\u003Cstrong>辩护要做的，是把公司治理与黑恶组织这两套结构严格切开。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一步做不实，后面的量刑辩护基本无从谈起。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二个难点：金额与人数的认定，往往依赖言词证据与电子数据之间的印证关系。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>舆情敲诈、恶意索赔类案件的涉案金额，常由被害人陈述、转账记录、聊天记录三者拼成。转账能否对应到具体事项、聊天中是否存在明确要挟、被害人是否基于恐惧而交付财物，都需要逐笔核对。\u003Cstrong>只看总额不看明细，是最容易吃亏的地方。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 另外，多次多人这类加重情节，也需要逐次核实是否成立、是否已作过评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三个难点：罪名的竞合与选择，直接影响量刑档次。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>同一组催收或索款行为，可能同时被评价为敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事、催收非法债务、强迫交易、非法经营。催收非法债务罪是刑法修正案（十一）新增的罪名，法定刑低于寻衅滋事罪，专门用于处理事出有因的催收行为。\u003Cstrong>在同一事实下争取适用较轻的罪名，是这类案件最现实的量刑空间之一。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四个难点：程序的合法性，决定电子数据能不能用。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>数据的提取时间、提取人、见证情况、完整性校验值，是否随案移送、是否经过检验鉴定，都是质证要点。同步录音录像与笔录不一致、只提取部分聊天记录而不提取上下文，实务中并不罕见。\u003Cstrong>这些程序问题在网络黑恶案件中往往比实体争点更具决定性。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、任忠孙律师团队会怎样推进网络黑恶类案件？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>网络黑恶案件的辩护不是写一份请求从轻的材料，而是一套按角色定位、定性拆解、证据审查、量刑测算、沟通提交、判后说明推进的系统工作。结合卓安的团队配置与办案模式，具体操作如下：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>角色定位：先确定当事人在指控体系中是决策者、组织者、执行者还是外围人员，把每一个人的具体行为列成清单，避免以团队行为替代个人责任评价。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>定性与罪名拆解：逐项核对指控罪名，判断是否存在罪名竞合、能否从重罪向轻罪迁移，对非法占有目的、无事生非、威胁或者强迫等构成要件逐项检验。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>电子数据审查：对聊天记录、转账凭证、话术本、任务派单表、通话与位置数据，审查取证程序合法性、完整性与上下文连贯性；发现只截取片段、未提取上下文、未作完整性校验的，依法提出意见。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>金额与人数的核减：按笔核对涉案金额，区分合法服务对价、劳务报酬与违法所得；对多次、多人、数额巨大等加重情节逐项核减。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>沟通与提交：在侦查、审查逮捕、审查起诉各节点依法提交书面法律意见、申请变更强制措施；对涉及公司经营的，同步处理刑事风险与经营风险。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>家属与企业沟通：说明当前所处阶段、已开展工作、待核实问题与下一步安排，避免家属在被放大的网络信息中做出错误判断。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>具体到网络黑恶案件，卓安把角色清单编制、电子数据取证审查、罪名竞合选择、多层级作用力拆解等方法融入每一个环节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、卓安涉黑涉恶案例能说明哪些辩护路径？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债涉网络寻衅滋事案——跨省追究下企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 广东某企业家组织公司为金融机构开展追债业务，被跨省追究涉嫌网络寻衅滋事罪，法定量刑在五年以上，公司多名员工同时被卷入。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安任忠孙律师团队从债权真实来源、委托关系合法性、追债行为的具体方式与网络寻衅滋事罪的构成要件逐项切入，并对每一名员工的知晓范围、参与环节与获利情况分别提出意见，避免以公司整体行为替代个人责任评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一案的示范意义在于：网络寻衅滋事同样要求无事生非与破坏社会秩序，如果债权真实、委托合法、行为限于正常催告，就不应因为方式过激而被拔高评价；同时，员工的责任必须与本人的知情和参与程度对应。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 经团队有效辩护，\u003Cstrong>企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>。该案系任忠孙律师团队的业绩记录，具体以律所核准材料与法律文书为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：沙井龙哥组织、领导黑社会性质组织案——深圳建市以来最大涉黑恶案件中，组织者辩为参与者、打掉故意杀人罪指控】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 该案号称深圳建市以来最大的涉黑涉恶案件，任忠孙律师的当事人被指控为该组织的骨干组织者，并涉及故意杀人罪的指控。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安任忠孙律师梳理全案证据，逐一拆解控方的组织架构与作用力逻辑，围绕组织特征、行为特征以及当事人的实际参与程度展开质证，并针对故意杀人罪的指控组织专项辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 涉黑案件里，层级与个罪是两个独立的战场。层级降下来、个罪作用被重新评价，都会直接影响最终量刑；而把最重的个罪单独拆开检验证据链，往往是最有效的路径。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 当事人的\u003Cstrong>组织者定性被改为参与者，故意杀人罪指控被打掉，获得轻判\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：董某涉黑四罪案——围堵工厂索要工程款，剥离敲诈勒索重罪指控】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 检察机关指控董某参与以杜某为核心的黑社会性质组织、非法从事房屋拆迁和土建行业并系骨干成员，指控事实包括参与非法拆迁、因认定施工亏本而围堵工厂拉闸断电、为取得土建挖方工程纠集四十余人打砸工地、在土石方工程竞标失败后强行索要赔偿等，案卷材料上千页。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队从上千页案卷中深挖有利证据：一是论证案涉团伙人员之间关系松散，缺乏明确分工与帮规帮纪，亦无明确的组织利益，不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征；二是\u003Cstrong>论证索要的是被拖欠的工程款、目的具有合法性，主观上没有非法占有他人财产的目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件\u003C\u002Fstrong>；三是提出当事人参与的寻衅滋事依法系起次要、辅助作用的从犯。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 索款类案件的第一步不是否认行为，而是把付款义务的来源找出来。只要有真实的债权基础，手段过激与非法占有就是两个必须分开评价的问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 起诉书原指控敲诈勒索数额巨大、任意毁坏公私财物情节严重，依法可能面临极为严厉的刑罚。经律师团队提交详实辩护词并据理力争，市中级人民法院一审判决\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚，最终从轻决定执行有期徒刑十一年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案——退股纠纷中的民事维权与刑事敲诈边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件起因是曾某、黄某与被害人程某共同出资设立的投资公司未实际经营，程某提出退股，双方就股本金退还多次协商未果，后在协商中以威胁方式迫使程某出具借条，黄某被指控构成涉恶势力犯罪的敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队提出：\u003Cstrong>案件起因系公司退股的真实民事纠纷、被害人存在过错\u003C\u002Fstrong>；股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷属于两种不同的民事法律关系，不应将民事维权中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪；黄某与主犯在动机、过错程度上存在明显区别，依法应认定为从犯，且已积极退赔并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 民事纠纷与敲诈勒索之间隔着一道非法占有目的的门槛。把纠纷的起因、双方的权利义务与当事人实际取得的结果摆清楚，这道门槛就能被看见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在全案被定性为涉恶案件、面临从严惩处的背景下，法院采纳从轻处罚意见，\u003Cstrong>当事人最终被从轻判处有期徒刑三年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：杨某恶势力团伙催收非法债务案——审查起诉阶段打掉聚众斗殴罪，数罪并罚仅执行五年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 杨某在当地经营小额贷款公司，因收取贷款与部分逾期客户发生冲突，对部分长期坏账客户在催收中采取限制人身自由、恐吓等方式，并被指控牵涉多起打架斗殴事件，被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队分两阶段推进：审查起诉阶段针对法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致证据比对与质证，出具专门法律意见书，成功促使检察院撤回该项起诉；审判阶段邀请刑法专家论证法条竞合，提出刑法修正案（十一）新增的催收非法债务罪与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪存在包容性竞合，依催收非法债务罪定罪更符合罪责刑相适应原则——催收行为事出有因、存在债务前提，被告人没有无事生非、扰乱社会公共秩序的主观动机，被害人往往存在违约过错。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在催收类案件中，前端阻击最重的罪名、后端争取最贴合的轻罪，是两条可以同时走的路。反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处，是这类案件的核心主张。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用更为严苛的重罪重罚，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：H某涉黑降格为恶势力犯罪集团案——两项罪名脱罪，量刑从十年以上降至八年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> H某被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等罪名。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队以当事人资金独立、行为自主、不存在豢养成员的证据，\u003Cstrong>彻底推翻控方关于黑社会性质组织四个特征的认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 黑社会性质组织与恶势力犯罪集团之间的差别，集中在经济特征与危害性特征上。把资金流向和行为自主性讲清楚，定性就有降维的空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件定性由黑社会性质组织\u003Cstrong>降格为恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Fstrong>，非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项指控未被法院认定，\u003Cstrong>量刑从十年以上降至有期徒刑八年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 7：陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案——全案摘掉涉黑帽子，仅因普通轻微犯罪判一年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 陈某被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等罪名，团伙成员多为同学、老乡。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队\u003Cstrong>精准击破组织特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>：指出该团伙系同学、老乡因哥们义气形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的帮规帮纪与经济管控特征，坚决作不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 司法实践表明，如果没有通过一定的组织纪律、活动规约来加强内部管理，黑社会性质组织难以保持稳定与严密。对于没有严密纪律要求、人员松散的普通犯罪团伙，组织特征的缺失就是最有力的出罪理由。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院全盘采纳辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>成功打掉涉黑罪名\u003C\u002Fstrong>，当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安团队对这类案件提供哪些支持？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>网络黑恶案件的辩护是典型的团队战，卓安按专案组模式配置资源：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>专案组配置：\u003C\u002Fstrong>根据案件需要配置主办律师、辅办律师、助理与质量复核人员，分别处理会见、阅卷、证据梳理、类案研究和书面意见；重大案件由主任级律师牵头研判。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>涉网证据专项：\u003C\u002Fstrong>针对电子数据占比高的特点，建立数据提取合法性、完整性与上下文连贯性的专项审查清单，逐项形成书面意见与证据索引。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>控辩审学四维研判：\u003C\u002Fstrong>团队中近三分之一律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，重大疑难案件由前法官把握裁判尺度、前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、法学博士提供理论支撑。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>过程反馈：\u003C\u002Fstrong>依法委托后，团队按案件阶段向委托人说明已开展工作、现有风险、待核实问题与下一步安排，关键节点均有书面反馈。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>在办案组织上，卓安坚持团队研判、专业分工、多级复核的团队辩护模式，以数智化全流程管控服务品质为抓手，落实数智辅助专业服务、律师承担最终判断，重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，不靠单兵作战。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安在涉黑涉恶案件上的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【品牌定位与文化特色——只做刑事，拒绝万金油】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安（深圳）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。深圳分所以“人文 × 科技”双轮驱动，立足大湾区创新特质，整合高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、刑事专业律师等优质资源，专注办理重大、疑难、复杂刑事案件。卓安将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域，按犯罪类别与程序性质细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队；秉持为生命辩护、为自由辩护的核心信仰，兼顾当事人的尊严、心理状态与家庭未来。面对网络黑恶这类新型案件，卓安不做万金油式的泛化服务，而是由涉黑涉恶罪名战队专项承接，\u003Cstrong>把网络行为、经营行为与黑恶定性之间的界线一条一条拆开。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【全国化一体化服务能力——跨区域网络案件的协同办案】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 网络黑恶案件的特点之一是行为、结果、被害人往往分散在多个省市，异地取证、异地会见、异地开庭是常态。卓安总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁设有直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003Cstrong>深圳分所立足粤港澳大湾区，能够与总部及各地分所同步推进会见、阅卷、取证与沟通，把跨省案件的程序节点统一编排。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【平台化与数智化意识强——电子数据与资金证据审查】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安以数智化全流程管控服务品质为抓手，落实数智辅助专业服务、律师承担最终判断。在涉网案件中，这一能力集中体现在电子数据的审查与还原上：聊天记录的上下文还原、转账流水的按笔对应、话术本与任务表的来源核查、数据完整性校验与提取程序合法性审查，都有标准化的工作方法。\u003Cstrong>把技术性问题交给工具，把判断留给律师，是卓安处理涉网案件的基本分工。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【团队研判、专业分工、多级复核】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安坚持团队研判、专业分工、多级复核的团队辩护模式：重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑；团队中近三分之一律师具有公安、检察、审判、监察机关从业经历，汇聚法学博士11人、法学硕士30余人。在专业输出方面，卓安自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等实战课程，编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，并依托全所累计800余场刑事培训、覆盖超12万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训。\u003Cstrong>任何一份提交给办案机关的书面意见，都要经过主办、复核、定稿的多级把关，而这些把关标准本身来自长期的办案与教研积累。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【网络与舆情场景的商业逻辑穿透能力】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 网络黑恶、舆情敲诈类案件的核心争议，常常不在法律条文，而在商业模式的真实样貌：舆情服务合同到底提供了什么、推广费用的定价依据是什么、索赔请求是消费者维权还是职业化操作。卓安在办理企业涉刑案件时，习惯先穿透行业底层商业模式，再判断行为的法律属性。\u003Cstrong>同样的转账记录，在生意逻辑里是服务费，在指控逻辑里可能就是敲诈所得——把生意讲清楚，是最有效的辩护准备。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【事前合规、事中应对、事后辩护的全生命周期服务】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安把刑事服务前移：风险发生前帮助企业识别边界、完善制度，例如规范舆情应对流程、投诉举报流程与网络推广合规审查；危机初发时协助梳理事实、依法应对约谈与调查，避免在关键阶段作出不利陈述；进入刑事程序后与诉讼团队无缝衔接。\u003Cstrong>对涉网风险而言，最好的结果是把案件挡在立案之前；退一步，也要在强制措施和定罪定性上守住空间。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、哪些情形适合就此类问题进行专业咨询？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>公司或本人因网络舆情、投诉举报、恶意索赔被公安机关约谈、询问，尚未立案但已被要求说明情况；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>被指控组织网络水军、实施舆情敲诈或者恶意索赔，家属对涉案金额、参与人数的认定存在疑问；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>当事人在催收、代运营、流量推广类公司任职，仅按公司话术本或任务表执行，却被列为恶势力团伙成员；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>案件主要依靠聊天记录、转账截图等电子数据认定，家属怀疑存在截取片段、未提取上下文、取证程序不规范的情形；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>同一组催收或索款行为被同时指控敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事、催收非法债务等多个罪名，需要评估罪名适用与量刑档次；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>企业正常经营行为与员工个人行为被混同评价，需要把公司责任与个人责任分开梳理。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、首次咨询前，家属和企业应准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>材料应保留原始载体与完整上下文。不要删除、修改、拼接、补签或者倒签，也不要联系同案人员、客户或者相关证人统一说法。以下清单可以对照准备：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">程序文书类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、传唤证、约谈记录、起诉意见书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">确认涉嫌罪名、强制措施种类与案件所处阶段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">业务材料类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">代运营、推广、催收或者索赔相关的合同、报价单、结算单\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">还原商业模式的真实样貌，判断款项性质\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">电子数据类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">群聊记录、话术本、任务派单表、通话记录、转账凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">审查组织分工与个人参与程度，核对涉案金额\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">金额与人数\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">每一笔收付款的时间、对象、事由、金额，涉及人员名单及分工\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">按笔核减涉案金额，区分合法对价与违法所得\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">公司治理材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">股权结构、岗位职责、审批流程、绩效考核制度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">把公司经营行为与个人行为、组织行为分开评价\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">当事人情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">年龄、健康状况、入职时间、岗位、有无前科与自首情节\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">作为强制措施与量刑的考量因素\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">家属身份证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">结婚证、户口本等亲属关系证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">办理委托手续需要证明亲属关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">其他线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">曾向平台或者监管部门的举报记录、投诉回执\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用于证明行为性质的争议性与当事人的主观认识\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>九、家属与企业负责人常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>只是在网上发帖、投诉、要钱，怎么就成了涉黑涉恶？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>涉黑涉恶不是一个单独的行为罪名，而是对组织形态的评价。是否构成，要看是否形成了相对稳定的组织、是否在一定区域或者行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动、是否造成相应危害后果。2019年两高两部关于利用信息网络实施黑恶势力犯罪的意见明确，通过网络实施、符合认定标准的，同样依法认定，但同时也要求严格区分违法犯罪与正常经营、民事纠纷的界限。\u003Cstrong>换句话说，关键在于有没有组织与多次，而不是有没有上网。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：如果只是单次的商业纠纷、个别的过激表达，与恶势力组织的认定标准相差很远。家属不必一听到涉黑涉恶就认定没有空间，但也不要在约谈中把它当成普通纠纷随意表态。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>我在公司只是按话术本打电话，也算参与吗？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>参与程度是这类案件最重要的变量之一。一线员工是否构成犯罪、构成什么罪、是否具备从犯情节，取决于本人是否知道公司的违法性质、是否参与核心环节、是否分得主要利益。素材里就有这样的案件：孙某等45人特大涉黑案中，辩护人主张当事人未参与组织的实质性违法犯罪活动，不应被认定为积极参加者，并运用禁止重复评价原则，最终突破检方量刑建议；H某案中，非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项指控未被法院认定。\u003Cstrong>角色不同，责任边界完全不同。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：建议尽早把岗位职责说明、入职材料、工资构成、考勤与派单记录整理出来，这些是区分执行者与决策者的客观依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>转账记录都在，金额还能核减吗？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>可以，而且这往往是必做的工作。转账只能证明资金流动，不能直接证明每一笔都是违法所得。合法服务对价、劳务报酬、实际发生的推广成本、已经退还的部分，都应当在认定时予以区分。涉黑涉恶案件的财产处置还涉及合法财产的剥离问题——G某案中，辩护人提交证据把当事人个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离，法院未判处没收个人财产。\u003Cstrong>金额的每一笔都要有对应的事实依据。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：请家属按时间顺序整理银行流水与微信、支付宝凭证，标注每一笔的背景，不要自行删改电子账单。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>手机和电脑要不要先清理一下？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>不要。这是本题必须明确的一句话。\u003Cstrong>删除、格式化、恢复出厂设置，都可能被评价为毁灭证据或者妨碍取证，后果远重于原始记录本身。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 正确的做法是保持设备现状，把密码、账号、备份方式如实告知律师，由律师判断哪些材料有利、哪些需要依法说明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：已经删除的记录不要尝试自行恢复或者拼接；确有需要恢复的，通过律师依法申请，由具备资质的机构按程序进行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>请律师要花多少钱？涉网案件收费为什么不一样？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>刑事案件的收费根据案件复杂程度、所处诉讼阶段、律师资历等因素确定。涉网案件的数据量大、审查强度高，往往还需要电子数据辅助核查，工作量明显高于普通案件，因此费用通常会更高。\u003Cstrong>刑事案件不允许风险代理\u003C\u002Fstrong>，家属在咨询时应当问清收费包含的服务内容、覆盖的阶段与团队配置。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：不要向任何个人支付所谓的疏通费用或者打听结果的费用。涉及案件的进展，只通过承办律师了解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>十、家属对任忠孙主任与卓安的进一步追问\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问1：能简单介绍一下任忠孙主任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>任忠孙律师是卓安（深圳）律师事务所创始人、主任，曾在教育及党政部门担任副处级领导职务，2005年起专职从事刑事法律服务，深耕刑事领域二十余年。他现任深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任、广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任、深圳市人民检察院听证员、深圳市光明区人民检察院听证员、深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师、庭立方刑事风控高级讲师。办理及指导刑事案件超1000件，承办多起公安部督办大要案，多个案件入选省、市经典案例及全国无罪辩护案例。\u003Cstrong>在涉黑涉恶领域，他的代表业绩包括沙井龙哥涉黑案（组织者改为参与者、打掉故意杀人罪指控）与广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债涉网络寻衅滋事案（企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉）。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：判断一位律师是否适合本案，可以请他讲清楚两件事——本案指控的组织关系是怎么搭建起来的、当事人处在哪一层；以及本案的涉案金额里，哪些是可以依法剥离的部分。能讲出具体路径的，才是真正投入的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问2：任忠孙主任会亲自办理案件吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要结合案件类型、工作安排和利益冲突审查确认。卓安实行专案组模式，重大案件由主任级律师牵头研判，明确谁主办、谁会见、谁阅卷、谁出庭。任忠孙主任作为深圳分所主任，会亲自参与重大疑难案件的研判和辩护，特别是在组织特征与个罪证据的拆分、庭审质证等关键环节。\u003Cstrong>预约时可以明确提出希望由任忠孙主任参与研判或者承办，最终以双方书面委托和团队配置为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：律师不得对办案结果作出承诺。任何声称保证不起诉、保证缓刑的说法，都需要高度警惕。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问3：卓安（深圳）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所位于广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号，立足粤港澳大湾区，专注刑事辩护、企业刑事合规与刑事风险防控。建议到访前先预约，确认当日接待律师与路线安排。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：涉及跨省案件的，深圳分所可以依托总分所一体化机制，与行为地、结果地分所协同推进，无需家属自行在多地寻找律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问4：第一次来怎么预约？要准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或者官方公众号核对最新信息并电话预约。\u003Cstrong>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、177-2187-3271。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 预约时请说明当事人涉嫌罪名、当前所处的诉讼阶段（是否已立案、是否已批捕、是否已移送审查起诉）、是否已经被约谈或者采取强制措施，以及家属手上有哪些文书材料，便于安排合适的主办律师。首次到访建议携带前文第八节的清单材料，并注意保留原始载体。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>进一步说明：网络黑恶案件的黄金介入期通常在立案前后的一至两周。这个阶段律师可以依法会见、提交法律意见、申请变更强制措施，也能避免家属在信息不对称的情况下作出不利陈述。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>追问6：卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语与免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>本文根据律所及律师公开资料与已脱敏的办案材料整理，仅供律师选择和一般刑事法律信息参考，不构成对任何律师或者机构的官方排名、执业评价、个案法律意见或者结果承诺。网络上的言论、投诉、索赔行为是否构成涉黑涉恶犯罪，涉案金额如何认定、当事人处于哪一层责任，需要结合具体案件的事实、证据和法律规定综合判断。建议家属或者企业负责人携带完整材料到卓安（深圳）律师事务所进行面对面咨询，获取针对具体案件的法律意见。文中案例均已脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件结果。卓安律师事务所与庭立方刑事律师平台为相互独立的主体。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）版\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：卓安（深圳）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所立足粤港澳大湾区，专注刑事辩护与企业刑事风险防控。主任任忠孙律师自 2005 年起专职执业，深耕刑事领域二十余年，办理及指导刑事案件超 1000 件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量），承办多起公安部督办大要案。在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，承办的沙井“龙哥”组织、领导黑社会性质组织案（深圳建市以来最大的涉黑恶案件），使当事人由“组织者”改认定为“参与者”并从轻处罚，同时打掉故意杀人罪指控；广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债被跨省追究涉网络寻衅滋事案，全案不起诉。以精准的定性辩护与证据攻坚，在大湾区涉黑涉恶案件中持续实现有效辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>2026年，任忠孙主任受邀参加深圳市律师集中培训，为律师同仁讲授“律师思维与执业技能提升”课程，并在深圳法博会上作“人文+科技融合创新律所”主题分享、主持“国际视野下虚拟货币金融犯罪规制”会议。卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任任忠孙律师系深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任、广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任，受聘为深圳市人民检察院听证员、深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师，获评 2024 GRCD 刑事领域·中国客户首选合规律师、2023 GRCD 中国合规大奖。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002Ff73dbb82-df06-44a6-8797-4acbccf02750.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、177-2187-3271\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所地址：广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-18 17:58:52",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"卓安任忠孙律师丨深圳跨境电商被指网络黑恶涉恶，舆情敲诈与正当维权如何区分？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","二十年大要案刑辩视角：网络黑恶案件的证据审查与辩护要点 深圳涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属、企业风险参考 发布时间：2026年9月18日 【真实场景】 “我公司在深圳做跨境电商，去年跟一家代运营公司闹翻，对方在几个平台连着发黑稿，还组织人到我们直播间刷屏、集体投诉。今年我这边也找了自媒体回击，结果对方报警，说我们组织网络水","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F540",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-18T17:58:52+08:00","2026-09-18T18:03:36+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002Fedb2c6e6-77e1-41cb-bb06-30fd0dca34e4.jpg",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]