[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-538":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":637},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":627,"seoKeywords":628,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":629,"thumbnail":630,"content":631,"publishTime":632,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":633},538,"2026-09-18 11:08:30","帮家人催了几次债却被卷进“恶势力犯罪集团”，核心争议点不是催了多少次，而是人员有没有“经常纠集在一起”、行为有没有“为非作恶、欺压百姓”。这两个条件一旦成立，后果是双重的：量刑上从重，归责范围扩大到集团所犯的全部罪行；只要有一条断掉，定性就失去基础。第 1361 号周方健案中参与人员每次都不一样，法院按一般共同犯罪处理；第 1360 号吴强案中只图财、隐蔽实施而不逞强，法院认定构成犯罪集团，但不认定恶势力犯罪集团。卓安办理的 H 某案沿同一路径，把资金与客户各自独立、寻衅滋事由 4 起核减到 1 起这两件事做实，涉黑指控没有成立，恶势力犯罪集团的定性也未获认定。因合法债务纠纷引发、对象特定的催收行为，依法不应按恶势力案件处理。","恶势力犯罪集团,恶势力成员认定,催收债务,经常纠集在一起,为非作恶欺压百姓,涉黑涉恶辩护,刑事审判参考,卓安律师事务所","帮家人催了几次债，为什么会被认定为“恶势力犯罪集团”的成员？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F30c87b94-086f-494a-b932-5d3df398b6a0.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cem>认定“恶势力”成员需要满足哪些条件，与已经被认定之后的六个辩点\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">卓安律师事务所·涉黑涉恶犯罪专业委员会出品\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">帮家人催了几次债却被卷进“恶势力犯罪集团”，核心争议点不是催了多少次，而是人员有没有“经常纠集在一起”、行为有没有“为非作恶、欺压百姓”。这两个条件一旦成立，后果是双重的：量刑上从重，归责范围扩大到集团所犯的全部罪行；只要有一条断掉，定性就失去基础。第 1361 号周方健案中参与人员每次都不一样，法院按一般共同犯罪处理；第 1360 号吴强案中只图财、隐蔽实施而不逞强，法院认定构成犯罪集团，但不认定恶势力犯罪集团。卓安办理的 H 某案沿同一路径，把资金与客户各自独立、寻衅滋事由 4 起核减到 1 起这两件事做实，涉黑指控没有成立，恶势力犯罪集团的定性也未获认定。因合法债务纠纷引发、对象特定的催收行为，依法不应按恶势力案件处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: start;\">一、帮着催债为什么成了“组织成员”：“经常纠集”与“欺压百姓”两个条件才是关键\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">“他只是帮家里人去催过几次债，为什么就成‘组织成员’了？”这是 H 某家属反复问的一句话。H 某做民间放贷，2015 年到 2021 年向小微企业主、个体商户出借款项，月息三分到五分。部分借款人到期不还，H 某和同乡 P 某一同去催过几次，过程中有过言语施压、跟随、短时间不让借款人离开的情形。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">2021 年，公安机关对 P 某等人立案，认定是以 P 某为首的黑社会性质组织。H 某被以参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉，量刑建议十年以上。家属的困惑是两个法律问题：认定一个人属于“恶势力”成员需要哪些条件；这些条件里，哪些在案卷里找不到证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">这两个问题，最高审判机关自己判过。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: start;\">二、《刑事审判参考》两起案例：什么样的团伙不算恶势力，什么样的集团不算恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">《刑事审判参考》总第 123 集是“办理涉黑涉恶案件专辑”，收录第 1354 号至 1363 号十起案例。其中两起直接相关：第 1361 号回答“什么样的团伙不构成恶势力”，第 1360 号回答“什么样的集团不构成恶势力犯罪集团”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">2.1　第 1361 号周方健案：每次参与的人不一样，法院按一般共同犯罪处理\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">安徽省滁州市琅琊区人民检察院指控周方健等 7 名被告人系恶势力犯罪。各被告人对犯罪事实和罪名均无异议，只对“恶势力”这一定性提出异议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">法院没有采纳恶势力的指控，理由很直白：周方健系“分别纠集”他人实施违法犯罪活动，人员不固定，不属于“经常纠集在一起”，应按一般共同犯罪处理。周方健最终数罪并罚，执行有期徒刑五年三个月。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">2.2　第 1360 号吴强案：只图财不逞强，构成犯罪集团但不构成恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">这一起同时是最高人民法院指导案例 187 号，一审案号（2017）苏 0612 刑初 830 号。案情是：吴强等人约熟人吃饭时“劝酒”诱使对方酒后驾驶，再制造事故，以报警相要挟索要钱财，先后五次敲诈勒索；此后又纠集他人持械抢劫赌场参赌人员。公诉机关追加认定本案属于“以吴强为首带有恶势力性质的犯罪集团”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">法院的结论分两层。第一层，构成犯罪集团：吴强等人为共同实施犯罪组成了较为固定的犯罪组织，多次实施敲诈勒索、抢劫，符合《刑法》第 26 条第 2 款的规定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">第二层，不构成恶势力犯罪集团，理由同样具体：吴强等人的犯罪活动明显是为牟取不法经济利益，但缺乏“形成非法影响、谋求强势地位”的意图。设局劝酒、制造事故、以报警相要挟通过“协商”占有财物，整个过程都在隐蔽的情况下进行，极力避免被他人察觉，因此“为非作恶、欺压百姓”的特征尚不明显。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">吴强数罪并罚，执行有期徒刑十三年六个月，判决已生效。这两层结论可以提炼一条规则：人数够、成员固定、多次作案，可以支持犯罪集团的认定；要进一步认定为恶势力犯罪集团，还必须具备“为非作恶、欺压百姓”的特征和行为的公然性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">2.3　两案给出的三条判断标准：人员稳定性、主观意图、行为公然性\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto; text-align: start;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: left;\">判断维度\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: left;\">认定为恶势力犯罪集团需要什么\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: left;\">只满足一部分，法院怎么判\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">人员稳定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">纠集者相对固定，至少 2 名相同成员多次共同参与\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">每次参与的人都不一样，按一般共同犯罪处理，见第 1361 号\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">主观意图\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">有“形成非法影响、谋求强势地位”的意图\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">单纯图财的，可定犯罪集团，不认定恶势力犯罪集团，见第 1360 号\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">行为方式\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">行为具有公然性，“为非作恶、欺压百姓”\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">隐蔽实施、刻意避免被发现，不属于欺压百姓，见第 1360 号\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: start;\">三、卓安办理的 H 某案：涉黑指控不成立、恶势力犯罪集团也未认定，是怎么做到的\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">3.1　案件起点：一笔民间放贷牵出四项罪名，量刑建议十年以上\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">公安机关立案时认定的是以 P 某为首的黑社会性质组织，H 某被列为成员，以参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪移送起诉，量刑建议十年以上。辩护目标不是主张他没催过债，而是主张这些催收行为不足以支撑“组织成员”的评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">3.2　资金各自独立、客户互不交叉，组织关系这一层先被拆掉\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">组织关系是这类案件的地基。承办律师从资金和经营两头核对：资金上，看有没有共同出资、有没有共享收益共担风险、有没有“组织账户”，流水显示两人各自出借、各自收款、各自承担坏账；经营上，核对客户名单和借条来源，看客户资源是否共享、业务是否协同、有没有统一对外名义，同案人证言印证两人各自开发客户、互不介绍业务。这一步做成，关于“犯罪集团”的争点几乎自动消解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">3.3　寻衅滋事从 4 起核减到 1 起，“多次”的法定门槛没达到\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">起诉意见书把催收行为概括为多起，逐笔核对后能站住的并不多。H 某案指控寻衅滋事 4 起，1 起报案时间相隔过久，1 起系临时起意、事前没有纠集，1 起因借款人先动手引发，剔除后有效次数降为 1 起。次数减下去，《意见》第 10 条所说的“造成较为恶劣的社会影响”也跟着失去依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">3.4　结果：涉黑定性不成立，恶势力犯罪集团也未认定\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">两步工作合起来，H 某的定性发生了改变：参加黑社会性质组织罪不成立，关于组织关系的指控被推翻；基于催收行为源于真实债权、对象特定、次数不足，也没有认定其为恶势力犯罪集团成员。涉黑涉恶的定性不是靠一句“关系密切”建立的，它建立在资金、业务、次数这些能落到材料上的事实上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: start;\">四、律师观点与六个辩点：涉恶定性可以从哪六个地方逐项审查\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">4.1　“恶势力”不是罪名，但它同时改变量刑和归责范围\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">“恶势力”不是刑法上的罪名，当事人最终被判的仍是寻衅滋事、非法拘禁、敲诈勒索这些具体罪名。它的作用在两处：量刑阶段形成从重评价，以及改变归责范围。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">《刑法》第 26 条第 3 款、第 4 款把集团成员分成两类归责：首要分子按集团所犯的全部罪行处罚，首要分子以外的主犯只按其参与或者组织、指挥的全部犯罪处罚。集团里的事是不是都要算在他头上，差别就在这里。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">《反有组织犯罪法》第 2 条第 2 款把恶势力组织界定为尚未形成黑社会性质组织、但在一定区域或者行业领域内多次为非作恶、欺压群众，造成较为恶劣社会影响的犯罪组织。《意见》第 11 条规定，恶势力犯罪集团还须同时符合犯罪集团法定条件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto; text-align: start;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: left;\">层级\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: left;\">核心要件\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: left;\">法律后果\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">普通共同犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">二人以上共同故意犯罪，不要求组织性与社会影响\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">按各自参与的罪行处罚\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">恶势力\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">3 人以上、纠集者相对固定、2 年之内多次实施、为非作恶欺压百姓\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">不是独立罪名，作为从重处罚情节\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">符合恶势力全部条件，同时符合犯罪集团法定条件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">对首要分子按集团所犯全部罪行处罚\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">黑社会性质组织\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">《刑法》第 294 条第 5 款规定的组织、经济、行为、危害性四特征同时具备\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">适用第 294 条，法定刑显著提高\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">4.2　辩点一：参与人员不固定，不构成“经常纠集在一起”\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">《意见》第 7 条给了这个表述一把尺子：“经常纠集在一起”是指犯罪嫌疑人、被告人于 2 年之内，在一定区域或者行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动，且包括纠集者在内，至少应有 2 名相同成员多次参与。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">两处可以直接用。一是“2 年之内”：指控常把跨越五六年的行为放在一起，得出“长期纠集”的结论，条文要求的却是某一个 2 年区间内多次实施；把行为铺在时间轴上，往往能看出真正密集的区间并不存在。二是“至少 2 名相同成员多次参与”：每次去的人都不一样，团伙在结构上就是松散的，第 1361 号走的正是这条路。同条第 2 款还规定，时间明显较短、刚刚达到“多次”标准的，一般不应认定为恶势力。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">4.3　辩点二：只为收回合法借款，缺乏“谋求强势地位”的意图\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">《意见》第 5 条明确排除两类行为：单纯为牟取不法经济利益而实施、不具有为非作恶欺压百姓特征的违法犯罪活动；因婚恋、家庭、邻里、劳动纠纷以及合法债务纠纷引发，或者其他确属事出有因的违法犯罪活动。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">这一条对催收、讨债类案件意义重大：债权人主张的是到期债权，对象特定、有债务关系基础，不是不特定的“群众”。第 1360 号吴强案的裁判理由与此一致：明显只为牟取不法经济利益，缺乏“形成非法影响、谋求强势地位”的意图。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">具体要还原三点：债权是否真实，看借条、转账凭证、还款记录；相对方是否特定，看有没有明确的债务人身份和债务金额；目的是否为实现债权，看有没有超出债务范围索取。这三点立住，评价框架就从“为非作恶、欺压群众”转回“民事纠纷中的不当维权”。卓安律师办理的 Z 某案中，团伙以特定被害人为对象实施“仙人跳”敲诈，不具备公开欺压特征，最终从恶势力犯罪集团中剥离。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">4.4　辩点三：逐笔核对指控事实，“多次”的法定门槛可能没达到\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">涉恶案件的指控事实常常是“一揽子”的，起诉书概括为多起，逐笔核对后能站住的并不多。重点看四类事实：情节显著轻微、本应作治安处理的；与被指控的组织性质无关的；只有同案人概括性供述、无客观材料印证的；时间、地点、参与人对不上的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">《意见》第 9 条规定，“多次实施违法犯罪活动”至少应包括 1 次犯罪活动。对反复实施强迫交易、非法拘禁、敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事等单一性质的违法行为，累加后应作为犯罪处理的，可将已用于累加的违法行为计为 1 次。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">4.5　辩点四：“造成较为恶劣的社会影响”需要客观证据支撑\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">这一项经常是认定里最薄的一环，因为它依赖概括描述。《意见》第 10 条要求，认定“造成较为恶劣的社会影响”，应当结合侵害对象及数量、次数、手段、规模、人身损害后果、经济损失与违法所得数额、社会秩序混乱程度等因素综合把握，每一个因素都要落到卷内的材料上。常见的空缺是：没有群众报案记录，没有舆情材料，没有区域治安数据，被害人数少、损失金额小。若认定“影响”的依据仅为起诉意见书中的概括表述，就属于证据不足。W 某案中，法院未认定“恶势力”，与该特征证据不足有关。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">4.6　辩点五：不是组织、策划、指挥者，不按集团全部罪行归责\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">《意见》第 11 条把恶势力犯罪集团的首要分子界定为“起组织、策划、指挥作用”的人，其他成员则是知道是为共同实施犯罪而组成的较为固定的犯罪组织、仍接受首要分子领导管理指挥的人。落到具体事实就是：当事人在每一笔事实中实施的是组织、策划、指挥，还是被组织、被安排、被通知？有无证据显示其对他人具有支配力或者奖惩权？答案如果是否定的，首要分子、纠集者的身份即不成立，归责范围也就从“集团所犯的全部罪行”收缩为“本人参与的行为”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">《意见》第 6 条还写了一句排除规则：“仅因临时雇佣或被雇佣、利用或被利用以及受蒙蔽参与少量恶势力违法犯罪活动的，一般不应认定为恶势力成员。”第 13 条也规定，罪责相对较小、人身危险性和主观恶性不大的其他成员，可以从轻、减轻或者免除处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">4.7　辩点六：“恶势力”加“犯罪集团”不等于“恶势力犯罪集团”\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">实务中出现最多的推理跳跃是：既然认定了恶势力，就顺带认定为恶势力犯罪集团。但《意见》第 11 条写得很清楚，恶势力犯罪集团是“符合恶势力全部认定条件，同时又符合犯罪集团法定条件”的犯罪组织，认定恶势力成立的证据，不能自动证明犯罪集团成立。第 1360 号吴强案就是这个逻辑的正面例证。犯罪集团要另外证明《刑法》第 26 条第 2 款要求的“三人以上”“较为固定的犯罪组织”，以及明显的首要分子。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">《意见》第 18 条还划了一条程序上的线：二审审理上诉案件时，一审认定恶势力或者恶势力犯罪集团有误的，应当纠正，但不得升格认定，未认定的不得增加认定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: start;\">五、家属现在能做的四件事，以及律师的价值是什么\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">第一件，不要去联系被害人，也不要去接触同案人员。家属最容易想到的办法，是找借款人希望对方撤案，或找同案人统一口径。这两件事在侦查阶段都会被记录下来，一旦形成材料，反而成为证明“内部有统一安排”的证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">第二件，把资金和经营的凭证找齐，按时间顺序整理。银行流水、借条、转账凭证、还款记录、对账的往来信息，是证明“各自出借、各自收款、互不交叉”最直接的材料。H 某案的转机，起点就是一份把两人资金往来彻底分开的银行流水。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">第三件，趁家人还记得清楚，把他参与过的每一件事按时间、地点、在场人、起因写下来。催收类案件的争点常落在“这一次有没有纠集”“是谁先动的手”“是为了要账还是逞强”上，这些细节家属最清楚，等到卷宗固定之后再补就难了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">第四件，尽早让专业律师介入，并在起诉意见书形成之前提交书面意见。涉恶定性一旦写进起诉书，后面的每个环节都会围绕它补充材料；能改变它的窗口在案件前段，越往后越窄。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 style=\"text-align: start;\">律师的价值是什么\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">恶势力的认定不是单纯的事实认定，而是一项法律评价。同样的事实，评价为“一般共同犯罪”还是“恶势力犯罪集团”，量刑和归责范围完全不同。律师的价值在于，把“因合法债务纠纷引发、对象特定、事出有因”这一面貌完整呈现出来，并针对“经常纠集”“欺压百姓”“首要分子”逐项提出否定意见。这不是否认当事人催过债，而是主张这些行为在法律上的评价被放大了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">涉恶定性往往不是靠一个罪名争下来的，而是同时处理资金、次数与归责范围三件事。只办刑事的律所，在这类交叉问题上的经验更集中，这是卓安在这类案件中最实在的价值。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: start;\">六、条文与案例索引\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">· 《刑法》第 26 条、第 238 条、第 274 条、第 292 条、第 293 条、第 294 条；《反有组织犯罪法》第 2 条\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">· 四部门《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》（法发〔2019〕10 号）；《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》、《关于办理黑恶势力犯罪案件若干问题的指导意见》（法发〔2018〕1 号）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">· 《刑事审判参考》总第 123 集第 1361 号、第 1360 号即最高法指导案例 187 号；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">卓安案例库：H 某涉黑案、W 某涉恶案、Z 某敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: start;\">附：卓安在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累与委员会情况\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>作为全国第三家只做刑事的律所，卓安成立以来专注刑事辩护与风险防控，累计办理各类刑事案件超 8000 起，其中涉黑涉恶犯罪案件 200 余件，涵盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、聚众斗殴、敲诈勒索、强迫交易、非法拘禁、开设赌场等关联罪名。涉案人员覆盖组织领导者到普通参与者各层级，已取得不认定黑、不认定恶、不起诉、撤案、改判轻刑、涉案财产解封等辩护效果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">\u003Cstrong>专业出版：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安累计出版法学专著 65 部、发表学术论文 203 篇，围绕公检法运行机制、律师辩护、办案程序与犯罪类型开展专项研究。涉黑涉恶方向编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，发表黑社会性质组织与恶势力犯罪认定研究论文，形成扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成课程体系，包括《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师获得各类荣誉表彰 100 余项，多名律师受聘为西北政法大学刑事法律科学研究中心、西南政法大学刑事辩护研究中心、华东政法大学律师学院等高校特邀研究员，并为四川省公安厅、成都市政法委、成都市政府、成都市中级人民法院等 30 余家公检法、律协顾问单位提供咨询顾问服务。艾述洪律师于 2025 年荣任成都律协刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会：\u003C\u002Fstrong>四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会，是卓安在涉黑涉恶方向设立的专业办案与研究机构，由具有原公检法扫黑办案背景的律师、刑事诉讼法学专家与涉黑案件证据专家组成，定位为涉黑涉恶案件的定性纠错与轻刑辩护专业力量。主要职能包括：围绕黑社会性质组织“四个特征”与恶势力认定标准逐项审查证据，排除拔高认定；把当事人从被指控的犯罪组织中剥离，区分组织者、领导者、积极参加者与一般参加者；全面审查“四个特征”证据体系并依法申请非法证据排除；甄别合法财产与涉案财产，为案外人财产、配偶财产和家庭共同财产提出异议；在侦查、审查起诉、审判各阶段提交不认定黑恶的法律意见；编写办案实务手册与培训课程，输出扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">\u003Cstrong>核心成员：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">首席律师成安博士，执业近30年，长期研究涉黑涉恶案件的性质认定与财产辩护；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">主任何冰冰律师，前市级检察院员额检察官、反贪局侦查科科长；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">执行主任艾述洪律师，四川省首批刑事专业律师、卓安经济犯罪研究中心主任，擅长责任拆分与财产甄别；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">副主任魏军律师，原成都市中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长，曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审规程起草。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">委员会以事实和法律为依据开展辩护，不作结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">卓安律师事务所官网 \u003Ca href=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F\" target=\"\">http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">24小时刑事急救专线:17381975473、4000-148-149\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: start;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-18 11:31:10",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":634,"name":635,"icon":636,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":638,"description":627,"keywords":628,"canonical":639,"image":630,"jsonLd":640},"帮家人催了几次债，为什么会被认定为“恶势力犯罪集团”的成员？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F538",[641],{"@context":581,"@graph":642},[643,650],{"@type":644,"@id":639,"url":639,"headline":629,"description":627,"datePublished":645,"dateModified":646,"author":647,"publisher":648,"articleSection":635,"inLanguage":586,"image":649},"Article","2026-09-18T11:31:10+08:00","2026-09-18T11:08:30+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F30c87b94-086f-494a-b932-5d3df398b6a0.jpg",{"@type":651,"itemListElement":652},"BreadcrumbList",[653,656,658],{"@type":654,"position":6,"name":655,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":654,"position":38,"name":635,"item":657},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":654,"position":35,"name":629,"item":639}]