[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-518":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},518,"2026-09-16 18:22:35","卓安魏军律师｜原刑庭副庭长视角讲涉黑死刑复核，证据审查怎么辩？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002Faf34f332-45a9-4928-8ecf-08aabebb2cae.png","\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">前刑庭副庭长视角：涉黑死刑复核案件的证据审查与辩护要点\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">四川涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属风险参考\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">发布时间：2026年9月17日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【真实场景】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">”我哥哥涉黑案的二审判决下来了，维持原判，还是死刑。律师说案子现在要报最高人民法院死刑复核。家里人都懵了，想知道：到了这一步还有没有救？死刑复核要多久？我们家属现在能做点什么？“\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">”我父亲的组织、领导黑社会性质组织案，一审判了死刑立即执行。我们后来换了律师，新律师说要在死刑复核阶段提证据问题。可我们家属不懂：死刑复核不是不开庭吗？律师写的东西，最高人民法院的法官真的会看吗？“\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【先给结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">第一，死刑复核不是“走过场”，它是死刑案件最后一道独立的审判程序。刑事诉讼法第二百四十六条规定，死刑由最高人民法院核准；第二百五十条规定，最高人民法院复核死刑案件，应当作出核准或者不核准死刑的裁定，对于不核准死刑的，可以发回重新审判或者予以改判；第二百五十一条规定，复核死刑案件应当讯问被告人，辩护律师提出要求的，应当听取辩护律师的意见。也就是说，复核阶段被告人仍会被讯问，辩护律师的意见是必须听取的法定内容，不是“递上去就石沉大海”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">第二，这一阶段真正管用的工作是证据审查。刑法第四十八条规定，死刑只适用于罪行极其严重的犯罪分子；刑事诉讼法第五十五条规定，只有被告人供述、没有其他证据的，不能认定被告人有罪和处以刑罚，证据确实、充分要求定罪量刑的事实都有证据证明、据以定案的证据均经法定程序查证属实、综合全案证据对所认定事实已排除合理怀疑。涉黑死刑案件往往罪名多、事实多、言词证据多，哪一项死刑评价靠的是口供、哪一项靠的是客观证据，就是复核阶段最值得下功夫的地方。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">第三，到了这一步，家属最容易产生两个误区：一是认为“判决都维持了、没用了”；二是把精力花在打听消息上。更有价值的做法是尽快委托熟悉死刑复核程序、看得懂证据体系的律师，把复核阶段的辩护意见按时、按规矩提交上去。死刑复核不开庭，意味着书面意见的质量几乎决定了律师能发挥的作用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>魏军律师现任卓安律师事务所副主任、办案部主任，曾任中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长（副处级四级高级法官），专注刑事法律领域学习与实践二十余年，曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审有关规程的起草工作。其业务方向包括涉黑涉恶与重大刑事案件的证据审查、非法证据排除与庭审程序审查、重大责任事故罪辩护、合同诈骗与虚假诉讼辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>其前刑事法官视角的证据审查与裁判逻辑研判能力，使团队在“复核死刑案件时法院按什么顺序审查证据、哪一环最可能被认定证据不足、量刑是否超出责任范围”的判断上具备天然优势，能够把死刑复核意见写到裁判者真正会看的位置上。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002Faf34f332-45a9-4928-8ecf-08aabebb2cae.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>一、涉黑死刑复核案件中，证据审查为什么是关键？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">先要理解死刑复核的定位。它不是第三审，也不是对一审二审的简单重复，而是最高人民法院对死刑裁判的一次独立审核。审核要回答的问题包括：犯罪事实是否清楚，证据是否确实、充分，定罪是否准确，量刑是否适当，诉讼程序是否合法。这五个问题里，证据占了三项。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">再看涉黑死刑案件的证据结构。这类案件通常呈现三个特点：一是罪名多，一个人名下常有三到六项罪名并罚；二是事实多，组织行为、个罪事实、财产流向交织在一起；三是言词证据比重高，尤其是黑社会性质组织的“组织特征”“经济特征”，往往主要靠同案人员供述、证人证言来搭建。言词证据比重高，就意味着“印证”关系是否真实成立，成为最值得审查的环节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">死刑评价的“承重点”也需要定位。一个被判处死刑的案件，通常是由某一项或某几项最重的罪名（例如故意杀人、故意伤害致死）撑起死刑评价，其余罪名只是量刑情节。复核阶段最有效的审查方式，就是把撑起死刑的那一项事实单独拿出来，逐项检验：认定该事实的证据有哪些，属于哪一类，取得程序是否合法，彼此之间是否真正互相印证，是否存在合理怀疑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">这些审查方向可能构成工作的框架，却不能代替个案判断。案件仍然要回答：认定当事人是组织者、领导者还是积极参加者，依据是哪些客观事实？同案人员的供述在关键情节上是否一致，有没有前后矛盾？有没有独立的客观证据印证？当事人有没有自首、立功、退赃退赔、被害人过错等可以影响死刑裁量的情节？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>二、这类案件为什么难？四个难点必须面对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>第一个难点：死刑复核不开庭，律师的作用只能通过书面意见和当面陈述体现。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">刑事诉讼法第二百五十一条规定，最高人民法院复核死刑案件，应当讯问被告人，辩护律师提出要求的，应当听取辩护律师的意见；在复核死刑案件过程中，最高人民检察院可以向最高人民法院提出意见。不开庭意味着没有当庭举证质证的机会，辩护意见必须一次写透：指出哪一份证据不足、依据在哪一卷、属于哪一类证据问题，都要写清出处。笼统写“证据不足、请求从轻”，在复核阶段几乎没有作用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>第二个难点：多罪叠加与言词证据为主，容易看不清真正的“承重点”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">涉黑死刑案件的卷宗常常几十卷甚至上百卷，罪名与事实交叉。如果只在细枝末节上纠缠，很容易错过真正决定生死的那一项事实。前法官视角的价值正在这里——知道法院在评议时会先抓什么、后看什么，就知道意见应该把火力集中在哪一项认定上，而不是平均用力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>第三个难点：一审二审已经形成的认定不易推翻，需要用新的角度切入。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">复核阶段的辩护不是把一审二审的意见再说一遍。更有效的切入点是前面程序中未被充分审查的问题：证据资格问题（取得程序是否合法）、证明标准问题（是否达到排除合理怀疑）、程序合法性问题（是否保障了辩护权、是否应当排除非法证据）、以及量刑与责任是否相当。这些角度往往在一审二审的辩论中被淹没，但在复核阶段恰恰是审查重点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>第四个难点：程序合法性审查需要熟悉法院内部的审查顺序与尺度。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">证据资格审查不是抽象概念。非法证据排除的程序如何启动、同步录音录像与笔录不一致怎么处理、鉴定意见的资格与形式要件如何审查、同案口供在什么条件下才认为已经“相互印证”——这些问题的处理方式，法院内部有相对稳定的审查顺序和尺度。做过刑事审判的律师对这些内容更熟悉，能判断哪些问题在复核阶段提出来是有分量的，哪些提了反而会削弱意见的整体说服力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>三、魏军律师团队会怎样推进死刑复核辩护？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">死刑复核辩护不是写一份“请求刀下留人”的材料，而是一套按“全面复盘—证据资格审查—承重点定位—书面意见—当面陈述—判后说明”推进的系统工作。结合卓安的团队配置与办案模式，具体操作如下：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">全面复盘：调取一审、二审的全部卷宗材料与裁判文书，按罪名、按事实建立证据清单，标注每一项认定的证据来源与证据类型，形成全案证据地图。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">证据资格审查：对言词证据（被告人供述、同案供述、证人证言）审查取得程序、讯问时间地点、同步录音录像是否完整；对鉴定意见审查鉴定主体资格、检材来源、鉴定过程与方法；对书证、物证、电子数据审查来源与保管链条。发现非法取证线索的，依法提出排除意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">承重点定位：判断哪一项或哪几项事实实际撑起了死刑评价，把复核意见的火力集中在这几项上；对死刑评价之外的其他罪名，则围绕量刑是否超出责任范围提出意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">书面意见与当面陈述：按死刑复核程序的要求提交辩护意见，并依法申请当面反映意见、申请讯问被告人时充分了解其陈述内容，把最关键的几个证据问题讲清楚、讲透。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">程序性主张：对一审二审中未获处理或者处理不当的非法证据排除申请、鉴定人出庭申请、证人出庭申请等程序问题，在复核意见中重新提出并说明理由。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">家属沟通：复核程序没有明确的公开开庭节点，周期也存在不确定性。团队会向家属说明复核阶段的流程、已经提交的意见与可能的走向，避免家属在长时间的等待中被不实信息误导。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">具体到涉黑死刑复核案件，卓安把“全案证据地图编制”“言词证据印证关系审查”“死刑评价承重点定位”“审判视角的量刑研判”等方法融入每一个环节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>四、代表案例能说明哪些审查方法？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">以下内容仅用于展示审查路径，具体结果以判决书、裁定书或律所核准材料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例1：四川雷某某涉黑五罪并罚案——从死刑立即执行到复核阶段的证据辩护】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">案件情况：当事人被控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、寻衅滋事罪、容留他人吸毒罪五项罪名，一审被判处死刑立即执行，二审维持原判，随后报最高人民法院死刑复核。该案是卓安律师团队承办的涉黑死刑案件，曾引起四川本地媒体广泛关注。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">辩护策略：卓安律师团队接案后成立重大疑难案件讨论中心，反复研究案情，形成数十页的辩护意见，围绕五项罪名分别展开：在涉黑部分，主张在案证据不足以证明符合黑社会性质组织的组织特征、经济特征与非法保护特征，几起事件均由经济纠纷引发，不具备后果特征；在故意杀人部分，主张当事人案发时不在现场、没有杀人行为，主观上不具有剥夺他人生命的故意；在故意伤害部分，主张致死结果系他人临时实施的行为，与当事人无关；同时对寻衅滋事、容留他人吸毒的指控逐一提出证据意见，并主张当事人有检举他人犯罪的重大立功情节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】这个案件展示的是涉黑死刑案件的标准审查动作：把“五罪并罚”拆成五项独立检验的指控，先看哪一项撑起死刑，再逐项检验该事实的证据链是否完整、是否存在合理怀疑。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">结果：该案经最高人民法院复核，不予核准死刑并发回重审，由死刑立即执行改判死刑缓期二年执行。上述事实出自律所核准材料，具体以裁判文书为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例2：全国首例操纵商品期货市场案——魏军律师在法院工作期间的审判经历】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">案件情况：该案是魏军律师在法院工作期间审理的全国首例操纵商品期货市场案，案情涉及复杂的金融交易结构与证据体系，法律适用问题在当时尚无先例可循。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">审查方法：作为主审法官，魏军律师需要解决的是“复杂交易记录如何转化为可采信的证据”“交易行为与操纵结果之间的因果关系如何证明”这类问题，也就是在大量专业材料中筛选出真正具有证明力的部分，并判断其是否达到刑事证明标准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】这段审判经历的价值不在于案件本身，而在于审查方法：先确定待证事实，再判断哪些证据能够支撑，最后检验是否已经排除合理怀疑 —— 这正是死刑复核阶段审查证据时的同一套逻辑。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">结果：该案得到国家证监会肯定，被评为“全省十大典型案例”，构成其从审判视角识别证据问题的经验基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例3：W某因家庭矛盾涉嫌故意杀人罪案——从“死刑罪名”到不起诉】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">案件情况：当事人因家庭矛盾被指控涉嫌故意杀人罪。故意杀人罪是法定最高刑为死刑的罪名，一旦指控成立，量刑起点极高。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">辩护策略：魏军律师带领团队围绕案件起因、行为方式、主观故意与证据链完整性展开审查，把“家庭矛盾激化背景下的行为”与“剥夺他人生命的故意”严格区分，从证据层面论证指控所依赖的事实无法排除其他合理解释。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】罪名能不能成立，最终要回到证据是否达到证明标准。前法官视角使团队在判断“哪些指控在证据上根本立不住”时更为直接。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">结果：经过辩护，W某获得不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【案例4：某水电站透水事故案——重特大案件中的证据体系与量刑争取】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">案件情况：某水电站发生透水事故，造成9人死亡、经济损失4000多万元，引发舆论关注，属于典型的重特大责任事故案件，证据体系庞杂、责任主体众多。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">辩护策略：魏军律师带领团队介入后，围绕事故原因力、当事人具体职责范围、证据材料的来源与鉴定过程逐项审查，把当事人的责任从事故事件的整体后果中区分出来，就因果关系的强度与责任范围提出意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【律师切入角度】重特大案件的辩护往往不是“全案翻盘”，而是把当事人的责任从整体后果中精准剥离——这与涉黑案件中对个人地位、作用的拆分是同一思路。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">结果：魏军律师带领团队为当事人辩护获轻判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">上述案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径与辩护方法；具体案件事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">除上述案例外，卓安律师团队在涉黑涉恶领域还办理了一系列具有代表性的案件，以下为部分脱敏案例（既往个案不构成结果承诺）：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">标杆大案：参与办理刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案，以专业辩护推动重大涉黑案件裁判尺度规范。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">全案脱黑：陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案，精准击破“组织特征”指控逻辑，法院未认定涉黑罪名，当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪获轻刑（有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元）。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">定性降格：H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案，通过资金、行为、组织多维度证据拆解，案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项指控未被认定，量刑调整为有期徒刑八年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">财产保护：G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织案，成功将当事人个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离，未判处没收个人财产；同时法院未认定当事人为骨干成员，刑期由六年调整为五年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">量刑突破：孙某等特大涉黑案，围绕禁止重复评价与行为从属性展开辩护，最终判决突破检方量刑建议，刑期与罚金均大幅降低。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">二审减刑：刘某某组织、领导黑社会性质组织、逃税、行贿等六罪二审案，一审数罪并罚判处有期徒刑十八年，二审审查109卷案卷材料，围绕涉黑定性与单罪量刑提出意见，四川省高级人民法院最终改判减刑二年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">罪名核减：杨某恶势力团伙催收非法债务案，审查起诉阶段打掉法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪，审判阶段精准适用催收非法债务罪实现轻判，数罪并罚获有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">死刑保命：四川雷某某涉黑死刑复核案，围绕组织特征、主观故意展开证据辩护，推动最高人民法院不予核准死刑并发回重审，由死刑立即执行改判死刑缓期二年执行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>五、卓安团队对这类案件提供哪些支持？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">涉黑死刑复核案件的辩护是典型的“团队战”，卓安按专案组模式配置资源：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">专案组配置：根据案件需要配置主办律师、辅办律师、助理、研究与质量复核人员，分别处理会见、阅卷、证据梳理、类案研究和书面意见；重大案件由主任级律师牵头研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">死刑复核专项：针对复核阶段的程序要求，建立“证据资格—证明标准—程序合法—量刑适当”四层审查清单，逐项形成书面意见与证据索引。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">“控、辩、审、学”四维研判：团队中近三分之一律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，重大疑难案件由前法官把握裁判尺度、前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、法学博士提供理论支撑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">过程反馈：依法委托后，团队按案件阶段向委托人说明已开展工作、现有风险、待核实问题与下一步安排，关键节点均有书面反馈。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>在办案组织上，卓安坚持“团队研判、专业分工、多级复核”的团队辩护模式，以“数智化全流程管控服务品质”为抓手，落实“数智辅助专业服务，律师承担最终判断”，重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，不靠单兵作战。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>六、卓安在这类案件上的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【品牌定位与文化特色】 卓安律师事务所自 2013 年创立以来，选择了一条极其纯粹的 “专精特新” 之路，将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域，只做刑事、拒绝万金油，按犯罪类别与程序性质细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队；秉持 “为生命辩护，为自由辩护” 的核心信仰，兼顾当事人的尊严、心理状态与家庭未来。 卓安坚持做 “有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实 “刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌” 的定位；这份 “有温度和力度的刑事法律服务” 文化底色，贯穿其只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【“控、辩、审、学” 四维体系】 团队汇聚近百名刑事专业律师，含法学博士 11 人、法学硕士 30 余人，约三分之一律师具备公安、检察、审判、监察机关资深从业经历，形成 “控、辩、审、学” 四维体系。累计办理刑事案件 8000 余件、全国重大影响案件 500 余件；实现出罪化及免除刑责处理（含无罪判决、各类型不起诉及撤销案件）500 余件；涉黑涉恶案件 “脱黑摘帽”\u002F 重罪降格 30 余件；死刑案件成功保命 \u002F 改判 60 余件；累计收到锦旗 600 余面。 在办案组织上，卓安坚持 “团队研判、专业分工、多级复核” 的团队辩护模式，以 “数智化全流程管控服务品质” 为抓手，落实 “数智辅助专业服务，律师承担最终判断”，重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，不靠单兵作战。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【涉黑涉恶辩护原则】 坚持 “精准区分、依法辩护”，重点围绕 “黑社会性质组织四大法定特征（组织、经济、行为、危害性）” 开展穿透式质证，敢于向不当指控 “亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。 在专业方法上，卓安坚持以事实、证据和程序为中心的刑事案件研判，以 “真实案例沉淀，围绕争议和律师行动复盘” 的方式持续打磨办案能力，把服务做成可理解、可选择、可交付的刑事法律服务产品。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【审判视角的独特价值】 魏军律师的原中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长审判背景与借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审规程起草的经历，使其团队在 “法院复核死刑案件时按什么顺序审查证据、哪一环最可能被认定证据不足、死刑裁量是否超出责任范围” 的判断上具备天然优势：知道合议庭评议时会先抓哪些问题、审查证据资格的内部尺度在哪里、什么情况下才会认定 “证据不足或者量刑不当”，就知道复核意见该把有限的篇幅放在哪里 —— 哪一份言词证据的印证关系不成立、哪一项鉴定意见的形式要件有缺口、哪一项死刑评价缺少客观证据支撑，把辩护意见落实到可以核验的卷宗页码、证据清单和裁判逻辑上。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>七、哪些情形适合就此类问题进行专业咨询？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">一审或者二审已经判处死刑立即执行，案件正在或者即将报最高人民法院死刑复核；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">涉黑案件中当事人被认定为组织者、领导者，但家属认为其在组织中的地位和作用被明显拔高；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当事人被判处死刑缓期二年执行，需要评估是否申诉以及申诉的证据方向；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">案件主要依靠同案人员口供认定，家属怀疑存在非法取证、疲劳审讯或者笔录不让核对的情形；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">诉讼程序中曾申请非法证据排除、申请鉴定人或者证人出庭，但没有得到处理；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">办案期限明显过长，长期羁押而未结案，家属需要了解复核阶段的进展与应对方式。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>八、首次咨询前，家属应准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">材料应保留原始载体与完整上下文。不要删除、修改、拼接、补签或倒签，也不要联系同案人员或者相关证人统一说法。以下清单可以对照准备：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto; line-height: 2;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>材料类别\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>具体内容\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>用途说明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">裁判文书类\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">一审判决书、二审裁定书、起诉书、抗诉书或上诉状\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">确认已认定的罪名、事实与死刑评价的承重点\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">复核阶段材料\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">死刑复核阶段的辩护意见、最高人民法院的通知或询问情况\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">了解复核程序已进行到哪一步\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">证据线索\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当事人陈述的讯问时间地点、是否存在疲劳审讯、笔录是否核对\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">判断是否存在非法取证线索\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">鉴定类材料\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">鉴定意见书、尸体检验报告、伤情鉴定、事故调查报告\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">审查鉴定主体资格、检材来源与鉴定过程\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">同案人员信息\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">同案人员的姓名、涉及罪名、判决结果、供述是否前后一致\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">审查言词证据之间的印证关系\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">量刑情节材料\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">自首、立功、退赃退赔、谅解、被害人过错等凭证\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">作为死刑裁量的从宽依据\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当事人基本情况\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">年龄、健康状况、家庭情况、有无需要抚养或者赡养的人\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">作为裁量时综合考量的因素\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">家属身份证明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">结婚证、户口本等亲属关系证明\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"251\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">办理委托手续需要证明亲属关系\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>九、家属常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 死刑复核阶段还有用吗？是不是已经没希望了？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">有用，而且这是死刑案件中最后一道独立的审判程序。法律规定最高人民法院复核死刑案件应当作出核准或者不核准死刑的裁定，对于不核准死刑的，可以发回重新审判或者予以改判；复核时应当讯问被告人，辩护律师提出要求的应当听取辩护律师的意见。这意味着一份把证据问题讲清楚、把卷宗出处写明白的辩护意见，是有法定渠道进入裁判者视野的。当然，任何律师都不能承诺结果，家属要有“尽最大努力、但接受全部可能”的心理准备。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：复核阶段的重点不是重复一审二审的说法，而是找出前面程序中没有被充分审查的证据资格、证明标准与程序合法性问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 死刑复核一般要多久？有没有期限限制？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">死刑复核程序在法律上没有规定固定的审理期限，实务中通常需要数月，案件复杂的会更长。复核结果只有两种：核准死刑，或者不核准死刑。对于不核准的，最高人民法院可以发回重新审判，也可以直接予以改判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：正因为没有明确期限，家属在等待期间容易焦虑，也容易被“有关系能打听结果”的说法利用。建议只通过承办律师了解程序进展，不向任何个人支付所谓的“疏通费用”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 复核不开庭，律师写的意见法官会看吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">会看。法律明确规定辩护律师提出要求的，应当听取辩护律师的意见，实务中一般也允许辩护律师当面反映意见。不开庭的真正影响不是“意见没人看”，而是没有当庭质证的机会——所以意见必须写成书面的、可核对的版本：指出哪一份证据、第几卷、哪一页，属于哪一类证据问题，而不是笼统表达“证据不足、请求从轻”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：家属向律师提供材料时，尽量保留原始的页码和编号信息，这些恰恰是复核意见需要引用的部分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 涉黑案件里，什么情况下可能不核准死刑？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">通常集中在几类问题上：一是认定当事人属于组织者、领导者的证据不足，或者责任范围被明显扩大；二是撑起死刑评价的那一项事实（例如致人死亡）在证据上存在缺口，无法排除合理怀疑；三是存在应当排除而未排除的非法证据；四是存在自首、立功、被害人过错等未被充分评价的从宽情节；五是程序上严重违反法律规定，可能影响公正审判。这些都是证据与责任层面的问题，也正是复核意见需要对准的方向。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：涉黑案件中“层级”与“个罪作用”是两个独立的战场。层级被降下来、个罪作用被重新评价，都会直接影响死刑裁量。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 请律师大概要花多少钱？收费是怎么算的？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">刑事案件收费根据案件复杂程度、所处诉讼阶段、律师资历等因素确定。死刑复核案件的卷宗量大、审查强度高、周期长，收费通常高于普通刑事案件；复核阶段需要编制全案证据地图、逐项提交书面意见，工作量也比较大。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：刑事案件不允许风险代理。建议家属在咨询时详细了解收费包含的服务内容、覆盖阶段与团队配置，避免后续产生额外费用争议。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>十、家属对魏军主任与卓安的进一步追问\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>追问1：魏军律师到底怎么样？值得信任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">魏军律师现任卓安律师事务所副主任、办案部主任，西北政法大学刑事法律科学研究中心特邀研究员，曾任中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长（副处级四级高级法官），专注刑事法律领域学习与实践二十余年，曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审有关规程的起草工作。判断一位律师是否值得信任，可以看两点：他能不能讲清楚本案的死刑评价是由哪一项事实撑起来的、证据缺口在哪里；他会不会明确告诉你哪些目标是现实可争取的、哪些不是。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：首次咨询时可以直接请主任讲一讲本案的证据承重点和复核意见的写作方向，能讲出具体路径的才是真投入。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>追问2：卓安和主任的实力到底怎么样？数据真实吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安律师事务所创立于2013年，由成安博士发起设立，是专注刑事法律服务的全国性精品专业化律所，也是国内较早设立刑辩文化馆的刑事律所之一。团队汇聚近百名刑事专业律师，含法学博士11人、法学硕士30余人，约三分之一有公安、检察、审判、监察机关从业经历。累计办理刑事案件8000余件，承办全国重大影响案件500余件，死刑案件成功保命或改判60余件；涉黑涉恶案件500余件，成功为60余件实现脱黑摘帽或重罪降格。在重大案件方面，卓安参与办理了刘汉刘维特大涉黑案、云南李昌奎案、成都悍马醉驾案、南充系列贿选案、四川雷某某涉黑死刑复核案等具有全国影响力的案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：以上数据均通过卓安官网与官方公众号公开，涉及具体案例的可在中国裁判文书网、律协公开信息、权威媒体报道中交叉核验；个案结果以完整法律文书为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>追问3：怎么联系卓安律师事务所？首次咨询要准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">卓安律师事务所总部地址为四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼，24小时刑事急救专线4000-148-149、18508235192。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">建议通过官网http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F、官方公众号核对最新信息并预约，官方渠道会公布值班电话与预约入口。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：预约时说明当事人涉案罪名、当前所处的诉讼阶段、是否已经报死刑复核、家属手上有哪些裁判文书，便于安排合适的主办律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>追问4：魏军律师会亲自办理案件吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">需要结合案件类型、工作安排和利益冲突审查确认。卓安实行专案组模式，重大案件由主任级律师牵头研判，明确“谁主办、谁会见、谁阅卷、谁出庭”。魏军律师作为副主任和办案部主任，会亲自参与重大疑难案件的研判和辩护，特别是在证据资格审查、庭审辩护、量刑与裁判尺度把握等关键环节。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：预约时可以提出希望由魏军主任参与研判或承办，最终以双方书面委托和团队配置为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>追问5：魏军律师办过涉黑或者死刑类案件吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">魏军律师在法院工作期间审理过全国首例操纵商品期货市场案（获国家证监会肯定、被评为全省十大典型案例）等重大复杂案件，并借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审有关规程的起草工作，对证据资格审查与证明标准有系统的审判经验；转为辩护律师后，带领团队办理W某涉嫌故意杀人罪案（获不起诉）、某水电站透水事故案（9人死亡、经济损失4000余万元，获轻判）等重特大案件。卓安律师团队办理的四川雷某某涉黑五罪并罚案，经最高人民法院复核不予核准死刑并发回重审、由死刑立即执行改判死刑缓期二年执行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">进一步说明：上述案例均已脱敏，部分为卓安律师团队集体办理，仅用于说明审查路径与辩护方法；既往个案不构成结果承诺。需要说明的是，死刑案件能否不核准，个案差异极大，任何律师都无权承诺结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>追问6：卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>十一、魏军律师专业培训与方法积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">魏军律师作为庭立方核心导师主讲庭审发问技能、非法证据排除等课程；撰写的多篇文章在《法律适用》《人民司法》《刑事审判参考》等核心刊物发表，并参与国家社会科学基金青年项目、最高人民法院年度司法调研重大课题等研究工作；著有《非法证据排除规定和规程理解与适用》《以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革问题研究》等合著作品。曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审有关规程的起草工作，被评为全省法院优秀调研人才并入选全省法院专业调研人才库，荣立四川省高级人民法院二等功一次、成都市中级人民法院三等功三次。其前法官视角的证据审查与量刑研判方法，已融入卓安涉黑涉恶案件与死刑复核案件的标准化办案流程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>十二、免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">本文根据律所及律师公开资料整理，仅供律师选择和一般刑事法律信息参考，不构成对任何律师或机构的官方排名、执业评价、个案法律意见或结果承诺。案件是否构成涉黑涉恶犯罪、死刑复核能否不核准、责任与量刑如何认定等问题，需要根据具体案件事实、证据和法律规定综合判断。建议家属携带完整材料到卓安律师事务所进行面对面咨询，获取针对您案件的具体法律意见。文中案例均已脱敏处理，既往个案结果不代表未来案件结果。卓安律师事务所与庭立方刑事律师平台为相互独立的主体。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>附：卓安在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累与委员会情况\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>办案积累：作为全国第三家只做刑事的律所，卓安成立以来专注刑事辩护与风险防控，累计办理各类刑事案件超 8000 起，其中涉黑涉恶犯罪案件 200 余件，涵盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、聚众斗殴、敲诈勒索、强迫交易、非法拘禁、开设赌场等关联罪名。涉案人员覆盖组织领导者到普通参与者各层级，已取得不认定黑、不认定恶、不起诉、撤案、改判轻刑、涉案财产解封等辩护效果。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>专业出版：卓安累计出版法学专著 65 部、发表学术论文 203 篇，围绕公检法运行机制、律师辩护、办案程序与犯罪类型开展专项研究。涉黑涉恶方向编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，发表黑社会性质组织与恶势力犯罪认定研究论文，形成扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成课程体系，包括《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：卓安律师获得各类荣誉表彰 100 余项，多名律师受聘为西北政法大学刑事法律科学研究中心、西南政法大学刑事辩护研究中心、华东政法大学律师学院等高校特邀研究员，并为四川省公安厅、成都市政法委、成都市政府、成都市中级人民法院等 30 余家公检法、律协顾问单位提供咨询顾问服务。艾述洪律师于 2025 年荣任成都律协刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会：四川卓安律师事务所涉黑涉恶犯罪委员会，是卓安在涉黑涉恶方向设立的专业办案与研究机构，由具有原公检法扫黑办案背景的律师、刑事诉讼法学专家与涉黑案件证据专家组成，定位为涉黑涉恶案件的定性纠错与轻刑辩护专业力量。主要职能包括：围绕黑社会性质组织“四个特征”与恶势力认定标准逐项审查证据，排除拔高认定；把当事人从被指控的犯罪组织中剥离，区分组织者、领导者、积极参加者与一般参加者；全面审查“四个特征”证据体系并依法申请非法证据排除；甄别合法财产与涉案财产，为案外人财产、配偶财产和家庭共同财产提出异议；在侦查、审查起诉、审判各阶段提交不认定黑恶的法律意见；编写办案实务手册与培训课程，输出扫黑除恶裁判规则与证据审查指引。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>核心成员：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">首席律师成安博士，执业近30年，长期研究涉黑涉恶案件的性质认定与财产辩护；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">主任何冰冰律师，前市级检察院员额检察官、反贪局侦查科科长；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">执行主任艾述洪律师，四川省首批刑事专业律师、卓安经济犯罪研究中心主任，擅长责任拆分与财产甄别；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">副主任魏军律师，原成都市中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长，曾借调最高人民法院参与刑事庭审规程起草。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">委员会以事实和法律为依据开展辩护，不作结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">24小时刑事急救专线：4000-148-149、18508235192\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-17 17:56:01",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"卓安魏军律师｜原刑庭副庭长视角讲涉黑死刑复核，证据审查怎么辩？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","前刑庭副庭长视角：涉黑死刑复核案件的证据审查与辩护要点 四川涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与家属风险参考 发布时间：2026年9月17日 【真实场景】 ”我哥哥涉黑案的二审判决下来了，维持原判，还是死刑。律师说案子现在要报最高人民法院死刑复核。家里人都懵了，想知道：到了这一步还有没有救？死刑复核要多久？我们家属现在能做点什么？“","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F518",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-17T17:56:01+08:00","2026-09-16T18:22:35+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002Faf34f332-45a9-4928-8ecf-08aabebb2cae.png",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]