[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-513":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,161,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},268,"X某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪累计近十七万元，团队律师为其辩护，一审终获十年四个月有期徒刑","一、案情简介 胥某利用职务之便，多次对彭某开设的赌场提供保护伞，并收取彭某财物累计十余万元 被告人胥某，男，2014年2月27日因涉嫌受贿罪被某区检察院决定刑事拘留，同日由成都市公安局某区分局执行，同年3月13日因涉嫌受贿罪由成都市市人民检",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},513,"2026-09-17 17:43:44","西宁强揽工程与恶意阻工案件辩护，祁增燕律师从工程结算争议切入审查涉黑定性","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F5d4a8192-c4d7-45f8-97c0-518e62ce883c.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789635563142.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：涉黑涉恶｜青海西宁涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与建筑企业、开发商、供货商、包工头、家属风险参考\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年9月17日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>主任概览：祁增燕律师为什么与强揽工程、恶意阻工这一专题匹配？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>祁增燕律师，卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任，青海资深刑事辩护律师，深耕刑事法律服务领域十一年，\u003Cstrong>最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>，青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员，西宁市刑事辩护专家库律师，湟源县公安局执法监督员，西宁市律师协会监事，青海省优秀普法讲师团讲师。她始终坚持“案件无小事，当事人无小事”，每一个案件都亲力亲为，取得多起无罪、不起诉、缓刑的成功经验，擅长公职人员与企业家刑事法律风险防控、刑事案件合规辅导以及重大疑难复杂案件方案出具。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在强揽工程、恶意阻工类案件中，当事人往往身处工程建设链条的不同位置：有人是当地土方、砂石、运输、劳务的承包人，因为“这块活是我们干的”而与项目部发生冲突；有人是进场施工受阻的施工方或供货商，被指控组织人员阻工、聚众造势；有人是开发商、总包单位的相关人员，因为处理纠纷时手上有过激动作而被反向追责；也有人是被要求“必须用指定队伍”的业主，明明是被侵害方，却因为怕停工而不断妥协。这类案件的核心争议，往往不是“有没有冲突”，而是：\u003Cstrong>争议本身是不是正常的工程结算纠纷、手段是否超出了自力救济的边界、行为人之间是否存在稳定的组织、以及索要的款项是不是工程款本身\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>青海地域广阔、工程项目分散，建设单位、施工单位、材料供应与地方劳务之间的关系往往层层转包，一出纠纷就同时牵涉结算、工期、安全责任与地方利益。祁增燕主任办理的\u003Cstrong>蒋某等人组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人等罪案\u003C\u002Fstrong>属重大涉黑涉命案件，社会影响大、指控压力重；其办理的\u003Cstrong>黄某灿、吴某星、黄某太涉嫌故意杀人罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪案\u003C\u002Fstrong>系多罪名交叉的重大复杂案件。这种在重罪指控下逐项审查证据、厘清各罪边界的能力，正是工程领域涉黑涉恶案件最需要的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、哪些工程领域行为可能进入刑事审查？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>正常的工程竞标、劳务承包、材料供应、结算谈判与民事诉讼，本身都是合法的市场与维权行为。风险通常出现在这些行为与强迫交易、寻衅滋事、聚众扰乱社会秩序、敲诈勒索乃至黑恶定性发生对应时。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>市场地位关联：\u003C\u002Fstrong>当事人是否在特定区域、特定工种（土方、砂石、运输、劳务）长期承接业务，是否被指“只许我用”“不能找别人”，从而被认定形成非法控制或垄断。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>手段方式关联：\u003C\u002Fstrong>是坐下来谈结算、走仲裁诉讼，还是采取堵门、堵路、断电、扣车、占据工地、阻止机械进场等方式施压，方式直接决定评价层级。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>人员与资金关联：\u003C\u002Fstrong>参与阻工的是本人和班组同事，还是被临时召集、按天计酬、按次分成的外部人员；索得的款项是工程款、材料款、工人工资，还是并无依据的“补偿费”“管理费”。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>事项关联：\u003C\u002Fstrong>每一次冲突对应的是哪一笔款项、哪一项变更、哪一个验收节点，时间与事由能否与结算争议对应，是判断行为性质的重要参照。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>这些关联可能成为调查线索，却不能直接代替犯罪构成判断。案件仍需回答：争议本身是不是真实的工程结算问题、手段是否超出必要限度、行为人之间是否存在稳定组织与分工，以及索要的款项是否具有合法依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、涉黑涉恶类案件为什么难？四条边界必须分开\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 工程结算纠纷与强迫交易，核心在有没有正当的市场交易基础。\u003C\u002Fstrong>转包、挂靠、垫资、变更签证是工程行业的常态，由此引发的争议绝大多数属于民事范畴。只有当行为人以暴力、威胁手段强买强卖、强迫他人接受或退出特定经营活动，且缺乏任何正当交易基础时，才可能落入强迫交易的评价。\u003Cstrong>有没有真实的工程关系，必须先把合同、签证、结算单捋清楚。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 阻工的进度与程度，要分层。\u003C\u002Fstrong>一次情绪化的聚集、一次短暂的机械停工，可能只是治安问题或工期违约；反复、有组织、持续多日地围堵工地、阻断通道、阻止施工人员进场，造成严重损失或秩序混乱的，才可能进入刑事评价。持续时间、参与人数、阻断方式与实际损失都要逐项核实，不能把一次冲突直接等同于“恶意阻工”。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 班组行为与个人责任，不能整体连带。\u003C\u002Fstrong>一个班组里有包工头、带班、司机、机械手、临时工之分。谁决定组织人员、谁在现场指挥、谁与项目部交涉、谁领取并分配款项，决定各自的责任范围。以“在同一个班组”推定全部参与，是此类案件最常见的错误。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 业主的让步与被侵害方的反击，也要防止误伤。\u003C\u002Fstrong>被强迫接受指定队伍的一方有权依法拒绝、投诉、报案；但如果被害方以举报相要挟索要超额“赔偿”，同样可能越界。维权与维权过界之间，隔着的是一条明确的证据线。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、卓安祁增燕律师团队会怎样审查强揽工程、恶意阻工类案件？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>先把工程关系与结算争议翻出来。卓安祁增燕律师团队会先核对施工合同、分包协议、工程量清单、变更签证、验收记录与付款流水，弄清当事人与项目之间到底有没有真实的工程与款项关系，把结算争议从刑事指控中剥离出来。这是此类案件辩护的第一块地基。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>逐次还原冲突现场的时间线。围绕每一次进场、每一次阻工、每一次交涉，还原“谁在何时、到了哪里、做了什么、持续多久、现场发生了什么”，把情绪表达与实质阻挡分开，逐项判断是否达到犯罪程度。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>审查“强迫”与“非法控制”的证据基础。围绕是否使用了暴力、威胁手段，是否具有强迫交易的主观故意，是否在特定区域或工种形成排他性的实际控制，逐份核对供述、证言、录音录像与书证，检验控方关于市场控制力的证明是否充分。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>核对人员分工与款项去向。从谁召集、谁指挥、谁交涉、谁领款、谁分配出发，梳理每名涉案人员的实际作用；同时核对款项是用于支付工人工资、材料款，还是形成了组织收益，资金流向往往直接影响定性。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>辨析罪名竞合与重复评价。同一行为常被同时指控强迫交易、寻衅滋事、聚众扰乱社会秩序、敲诈勒索。团队会辨析各罪构成要件与相互关系，防止同一事实被重复评价、被拔高定性。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>双向服务：出罪辩护与企业合规。对处在被追诉一端的当事人，团队作罪名剥离与责任分层；对施工企业、开发商与供货商，团队帮助梳理招投标、分包管理、劳务用工与结算流程中的合规风险，把风险防控做在纠纷发生之前。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、卓安涉黑涉恶与疑难案件辩护案例矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>卓安律师团队累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件，成功为 60 余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格。以下为部分代表性案例。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：蒋某等人组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人等罪案——涉黑涉命重大案件，组织认定与个罪证据精细拆分】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 蒋某等人在青海被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪及故意杀人等罪名，属重大涉黑涉命案件，社会影响大、指控压力重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安祁增燕主任围绕黑社会性质组织特征与暴力个罪逐项审查，从线索经营到庭审质证完整走查，重点辨析组织认定与个罪证据之间的对应关系，把组织层面的评价与具体个罪分别展开，避免以组织的整体性替代个罪证据的逐一检验。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 辩护意见在组织特征与个罪证据的衔接点上形成完整体系并充分呈现于庭审，\u003Cstrong>为当事人在重罪指控下争取到关键辩护成果\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：黄某灿、吴某星、黄某太涉嫌故意杀人罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪案——多罪名交叉精细化审查，厘清各罪边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 三名当事人被指控故意杀人、诈骗、敲诈勒索等多罪名交叉的重大复杂案件，定性争议大、证据体系庞杂。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安祁增燕主任对敲诈勒索等财产型犯罪的构成要件和证据审查精细把关，\u003Cstrong>逐项区分民事纠纷与刑事犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>，把财产争议的民事属性与刑事指控的构成要件分别检验，避免民事纠纷中的不当行为被直接拔高为犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在多罪名交叉的案件中厘清各罪边界，部分指控的定性依据得到有效回应，\u003Cstrong>为三名当事人分别争取到有利的辩护空间\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：董某涉黑四罪案——非法拆迁、土建与围标索款，剥离敲诈勒索重罪指控】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 该案曾被当地各大主流媒体广泛报道。检察机关指控董某参与以杜某为核心的黑社会性质组织，非法从事房屋拆迁和土建行业并系骨干成员，指控事实包括参与街区非法拆迁、因认定施工亏本而围堵工厂拉闸断电、为取得土建挖方工程纠集四十余人打砸工地、在土石方工程竞标失败后强行索要“赔偿”等。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队从上千页案卷中深挖有利证据：一是论证案涉团伙人员之间关系松散，缺乏明确分工与“帮规帮纪”，亦无明确的“组织利益”，不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征；二是\u003Cstrong>论证索要的是被拖欠的工程款、目的具有合法性，主观上没有非法占有他人财产的目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件\u003C\u002Fstrong>；三是提出当事人参与的寻衅滋事依法系起次要、辅助作用的从犯。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 起诉书原指控敲诈勒索数额巨大、任意毁坏公私财物情节严重，依法可能面临极为严厉的刑罚。经律师团队提交详实辩护词并据理力争，市中级人民法院一审判决\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚，最终从轻决定执行有期徒刑十一年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：孙某等 45 人特大涉黑案——房地产公司“亦商亦黑”指控下，刑期与罚金双项削减】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 孙某自 2003 年起在某房地产公司任职，该公司董事长涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪，公诉机关指控该组织“亦商亦黑、以黑护商、以商养黑”，在房地产开发的同时有组织实施违法犯罪活动。孙某被控为该涉黑组织成员，并涉嫌聚众斗殴及故意销毁公司财务账册等犯罪，全案共涉四十五名被告人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队多次与承办检察官、法官沟通案件定性与法律适用并提交针对性辩护意见：提出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引起、未造成严重后果，不应被拔高认定为涉黑组织成立的“标志性事件”；涉案组织并不完全具备黑社会性质组织的四大法定特征，即使认定涉黑，孙某也未参与实施实质性违法犯罪活动，不应认定为“积极参加者”；并运用\u003Cstrong>禁止重复评价原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>，提出销毁证据系出于亲戚情面及维护自身利益，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪重复评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 检方原量刑建议为认罪认罚九年、不认罪认罚十年六个月，审判阶段变更为不认罪认罚九至十一年。经律师积极辩护，法院踩着建议刑的“最低线”，\u003Cstrong>决定执行有期徒刑九年，并将罚金从二十万元大幅降至十三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：刘某某涉黑六罪案——砂石行业“非法控制”指控下，二审改判减刑二年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 刘某某系承包河砂开采的个体老板。一审法院认定其通过串通竞拍取得河砂采矿权、向国家工作人员行贿取得许可证，在当地砂石行业内形成非法控制，以组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、行贿罪、逃税罪、寻衅滋事罪、故意毁坏财物罪六罪并罚，判处有期徒刑十八年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队在一审宣判前三天紧急接受委托，加班加点复印并审查了多达 109 卷案卷材料，二审中确立核心思路：一是不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪，涉案团伙不符合《刑法》第 294 条关于黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征；二是对聚众斗殴、行贿、逃税等单一罪名逐一拆解，提出定性或量刑上的从宽情节，并\u003Cstrong>纠正了原起诉书对“逃税罪”的法理表述错误\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 四川省高级人民法院最终采纳部分关键辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>依法对刘某某改判减刑二年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。在当年涉黑重案的二审中（往往维持原判比例极高），取得了难能可贵的实质性辩护成果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：胡某涉黑多项重罪案——强迫交易、聚众扰乱社会秩序指控下，逐罪审查证据与作用】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 胡某被指控犯寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、强迫交易罪、聚众扰乱社会秩序罪、抢劫罪、开设赌场罪，并被指控在当地形成以其为首、持续近二十年、稳定组织成员达十余人的黑社会性质组织。一审成都市中级人民法院数罪并罚判处其有期徒刑二十三年，剥夺政治权利三年，并处没收个人全部财产。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师团队接受二审委托后立即前往看守所会见，在充分取得当事人信任的基础上客观分析二审改判的难度与案件真实走向；二审期间多次与承办检察官、法官就案件中存在的证据瑕疵与法律适用问题沟通，并提交书面辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>综合考量当事人在涉黑组织中的地位、作用、具体参与的个案数量及社会危害程度\u003C\u002Fstrong>，争取酌情从宽考量。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 四川省高级人民法院认为一审判决已综合考量各被告人的地位、作用、参与个案数量以及认罪认罚、自首等法定或酌定量刑情节，原判量刑适当，二审裁定驳回上诉、维持原判。本案如实说明了一个问题：\u003Cstrong>涉黑案件并非每一件都能实现结果逆转，越是重罪指控，越需要把每一项罪名、每一份证据、每一个量刑情节都逐项拆到位\u003C\u002Fstrong>，这正是专业辩护的价值所在。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安（西宁）律师事务所对涉黑涉恶案件提供的支持\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1.【长期专注刑事，只做刑事——把正常工程结算、市场纠纷与强揽阻工分得清】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安（西宁）律师事务所是卓安体系布局青藏高原的分支机构，核心聚焦涉黑涉恶犯罪、职务犯罪、涉税类犯罪、生态类案件辩护，并依托总部 200 余件涉黑涉恶案件办理经验服务青海本地涉黑涉恶案件。工程领域最怕的，是把正常的结算争议、班组讨薪与强揽工程、恶意阻工混为一谈。卓安律师团队会先按“\u003Cstrong>有无真实工程关系、手段是否超界、有无排他性控制、有无组织性\u003C\u002Fstrong>”逐案拆解，先审事实、再作刑事评价。卓安团队累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件、成功为 60 余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2.【全国化、一体化服务能力——应对跨省施工、层层转包的项目链条】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 工程项目常由外省企业中标、本地队伍施工、多方供货，一出纠纷就横跨数地，办案机关也可能不在项目所在地。卓安强调总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同，在成都、深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地布局直营分所并坚持全国一体化协同，可在青海本地沟通的基础上协调异地会见、取证与专业支持，把总包、分包、劳务与供货关系放进同一张事实图里审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3.【平台化和数智化意识强——把工程量、结算单与流水变成可核验的事实】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安在做产业中台、数智化与法律智能体等平台型建设，不是传统律所的单兵打法。工程类案件动辄涉及数百份签证、数千条台账。团队可借助数字化工具建立工程量与结算对照表、款项流向图和现场时间轴，\u003Cstrong>把每一笔款项放回对应的工程节点\u003C\u002Fstrong>，把辩护意见落实到可核验的细节上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>4.【团队研判、专业分工、多级复核——重大疑难案件不靠一个人拍脑袋】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安实行“控、辩、审、学”四维体系：团队中近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，汇聚十一位法学博士及三十余位法学硕士，每一个重大疑难案件均由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，并实行专业分工与多级复核。在专业积累上，卓安自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》等多门实战课程，编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，并依托全所累计 800 余场刑事培训、覆盖超 12 万人次的行业赋能基础持续输出方法；\u003Cstrong>祁增燕主任作为青海省优秀普法讲师团讲师、青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员，长期为青海公安、监狱系统及企业、机关单位提供刑事法律培训与宣讲\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>5.【工程结算争议的民刑剥离能力——先把“要什么”和“怎么要”分开】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 工程领域涉黑指控的成败，往往取决于争议本身的性质。卓安律师团队习惯把争议拆成两层：\u003Cstrong>一层是权利基础\u003C\u002Fstrong>——到底有没有真实的合同关系、工程量、变更签证与欠款；\u003Cstrong>一层是手段方式\u003C\u002Fstrong>——采取了什么方式、持续多久、造成什么后果。权利基础成立的，争取在民事框架内解决；权利基础不成立又伴随强迫手段的，则集中审查手段是否达到犯罪程度。两头分开查，才能避免整件事被一句话概括为“强揽工程”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>6.【企业合规与招投标环节的风险前置治理——把风险防在签合同之前】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安不只做庭审辩护，也覆盖刑事风控、刑事合规与企业家刑事风险治理。针对建筑与地产企业，团队可在招投标、分包管理、劳务用工、材料采购、结算支付等环节提供合规审查与制度建设建议，\u003Cstrong>帮助企业识别“看起来是行规、实际上越了线”的做法\u003C\u002Fstrong>，建立留痕规范与争议处置流程，把风险防控做在纠纷发生之前。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、哪些情形适合就此类问题进行专业咨询？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>土方、砂石、运输、劳务承包人因工程冲突被立案，需要区分正常结算争议与强迫交易、寻衅滋事；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>施工方、供货商被指组织人员阻工、聚众造势，需要逐项核对行为程度与因果关系；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>开发商、总包单位人员因处理工程纠纷被反向追责，需要厘清个人责任与单位行为边界；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>被要求“必须用指定队伍”“必须用指定材料”的业主，需要依法维权并固定证据；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>被指在特定区域、特定工种形成非法控制，需要就市场地位与实际控制力提出质疑；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>跨省施工、层层转包、多方供货的复杂项目，需要对合同、款项与人员建立统一事实框架。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、首次咨询前，家属或企业应准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>卓安律师团队建议：\u003Cstrong>先保护原始材料，再按工程项目与时间两条线建立台账\u003C\u002Fstrong>，不需要自行加工“说明材料”。以下几类材料可以先合法收集、分类归档，交由律师判断证明力与证明方向。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">建议准备的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">注意事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">律师重点核查方向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">工程合同类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">施工合同、分包协议、劳务合同、材料采购合同\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">按项目分册，注明签约与履行时间\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">是否存在真实工程关系与承包权限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">结算与签证类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">工程量清单、变更签证、验收记录、结算单\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">注明对应节点与实际完成量\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">争议是否属于真实结算纠纷、款项有无依据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">款项流水类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">预付款、进度款、材料款、工资发放记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">逐笔注明事由、收款人与去向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">款项是工程款还是无依据的“补偿费”\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">现场与往来材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">现场录像、照片、通告、停工记录、沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">保留原始载体，不剪辑、不拼接\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">谁在现场、采取何种方式、持续多久\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">程序文书类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">已收法律文书、办案机关通知、传唤材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">按时间顺序单独整理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">所处程序阶段与关键时间节点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">企业与用工类\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">工商资料、招投标文件、劳务名册、考勤记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">与个人行为材料分开整理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">个人行为与单位行为的边界、人员管理关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">通用要求\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">多人涉案的\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">各人材料分别整理，不统一口径\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">逐一核对各自知晓范围与实际参与\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、咨询与委托有哪些注意事项？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>通过卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）、官方公众号等公开渠道预约，并简要说明案件阶段、涉及人员及主要问题；正式提交敏感材料前，先完成利益冲突审查。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>同一项目中，总包方、分包方、劳务方与业主方立场往往相反，能否共同委托需看事实与利益是否冲突，应分别评估后再决定。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>重要材料尽量保留原件和完整备份，工程签证、结算单、现场录像尤其不要重制或剪辑，也不要自行制作“说明材料”提交办案机关。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>律师介入后会根据程序阶段确定工作重点，不承诺固定时间内会见，也不承诺取保、不起诉、轻判或其他特定结果。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>九、企业和家属常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 我们是本地的土方队，这个工地的活一直是我们在干，现在项目部找了别家，我们带人去讲理，这就算强揽工程吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：要分两步看。\u003Cstrong>第一步看有没有权利基础\u003C\u002Fstrong>：如果你们与项目部之间有合同、有口头约定并有施工与结算记录，“一直在干”就可能构成事实上的承包关系，对方单方更换施工队伍本身就是违约，争议属于民事范畴；如果你们从未与项目建立任何工程关系，只是凭“这块地方是我们的活”阻止他人进场，权利基础就不成立。\u003Cstrong>第二步看手段\u003C\u002Fstrong>：去交涉、递材料、申请调解是一回事；堵门堵路、扣车断电、阻止机械和人员进场是另一回事，后者可能被评价为寻衅滋事、聚众扰乱社会秩序甚至强迫交易。建议尽早把合同、签证、结算单、付款记录和现场情况整理清楚，这两步分开看，结论往往与第一反应完全不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 工地上的人都是我们班组自己叫来干活的，工资也是我们付的，怎么就被认定成“组织”了？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：班组用工与黑恶组织是两个不同层面的概念，不能简单画等号。认定组织性需要看\u003Cstrong>人员是否稳定固定、有没有明确的纪律规约、有没有稳定的经济来源与组织收益、是否存在层级管理\u003C\u002Fstrong>。正常施工班组是按工程量结算、人员随项目流动、以施工收入为生，与为实施违法犯罪而纠集、有帮规帮纪、有组织收益的组织形态有本质区别。实务中需要把劳务名册、考勤记录、工资与结算发放记录、施工任务安排整理清楚，用来证明人员之间的\u003Cstrong>管理与被管理关系属于施工管理，而不是违法犯罪的组织关系\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 我们索要的是被拖欠的工程款和工人工资，手段激烈了一点，会不会被定成敲诈勒索？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：有真实债权作为基础的索款，通常不构成敲诈勒索。敲诈勒索罪要求行为人具有非法占有他人财物的目的，并通过威胁、要挟迫使对方交付财产。如果索要金额与工程欠款、工人工资基本相当，款项也确实用于支付工资、材料款，主观上就难以认定非法占有目的。\u003Cstrong>真正需要防范的是三件事\u003C\u002Fstrong>：一是索要金额明显超出实际欠款；二是把“误工费”“管理费”“出场费”等没有依据的费用一并加上去；三是以捏造事实、举报违法、曝光爆料相威胁。这三点是否成立，需要把合同、签证、结算单、欠款凭证与每一次交涉记录逐笔对照后才能判断，越早梳理越有利。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 项目在山上、离城很远，工人们去工地一趟就是几百公里，这会不会被理解成“恶意阻工”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：距离本身不是定性标准，关键是\u003Cstrong>有没有实际阻断施工、持续多久、造成什么后果\u003C\u002Fstrong>。去现场交涉、要求对账、参与协调会，与占据工地、阻断通道、阻止机械与人员进场，是完全不同的行为。审查时通常需要看现场录像、施工日志、停工记录与损失核算，判断阻断是否真实发生、是否与当事人的行为有因果关系、损失数额的认定依据是否充分。实践中，损失金额常常被高估，而因果关系也常被过度延伸，这两点都是可以依法提出质疑的地方。建议尽早固定现场的原始记录与影像材料。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 案件已经按涉黑涉恶方向在查了，还有辩护空间吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：有，空间主要在权利基础、行为程度、组织特征与款项性质四个层面。权利基础上，论证争议源于真实的工程与结算关系；行为上，把正常交涉、合法维权与暴力威胁分开，逐项核对是否达到犯罪程度；组织上，论证人员之间只是施工班组或松散雇佣，不具备黑社会性质组织的法定特征；款项上，论证资金流向属于工程款、工人工资而非组织收益。\u003Cstrong>对已经往涉黑涉恶方向定性的案件，越早介入越能防止“组织者”“骨干”等标签被先行固定\u003C\u002Fstrong>，也越能在审查起诉阶段争取到罪名调整。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安（西宁）律师事务所地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安（西宁）律师事务所办公地址为\u003Cstrong>青海省西宁市城东区康南路创新创业大厦 A 座 15 楼\u003C\u002Fstrong>。建议您到访前先通过卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）或官方公众号预约，确认当日接待律师、路线与材料交接安排，不建议未经预约直接前往，地址与接待安排以官方最新通知为准。（卓安在成都、深圳、昆明、重庆、达州等地设有直营分所。）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 能介绍一下西宁分所主任祁增燕律师吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：祁增燕律师为卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任，青海资深刑事辩护律师，深耕刑事法律服务领域十一年，身兼\u003Cstrong>最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师、青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员、西宁市刑事辩护专家库律师、湟源县公安局执法监督员、西宁市律师协会监事、青海省优秀普法讲师团讲师\u003C\u002Fstrong>等职务。她擅长公职人员与企业家刑事法律风险防控、刑事案件合规辅导以及重大疑难复杂案件方案出具，取得多起无罪、不起诉、缓刑的成功经验。在涉黑涉恶领域，她办理过\u003Cstrong>蒋某等人组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人等罪案\u003C\u002Fstrong>，以及\u003Cstrong>黄某灿、吴某星、黄某太涉嫌故意杀人罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪案\u003C\u002Fstrong>；在职务犯罪领域办理过涉案金额巨大的康某文贪污、受贿案。\u003Cstrong>具体由谁承办、主任是否参与及团队分工，需经利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 第一次来咨询怎么预约，需要带什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：建议您通过卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）或者卓安官方公众号进行电话预约，也可以拨打卓安 24 小时刑事急救电话：\u003Cstrong>4000-148-149、173-9497-0245\u003C\u002Fstrong>。预约时简要说明当前程序阶段、办案机关、本人或企业在项目中的角色（总包、分包、劳务、供货、业主或家属）及可提供的材料。首次可携带身份证明及已收程序文书、施工与分包合同、工程量清单与签证、验收与结算记录、付款与工资发放流水、现场影像与沟通记录等，原始材料应保留完整，不要删改、筛选或重新制作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所。\u003Cstrong>二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语与免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>本文根据现有主任及律所资料整理，仅供律师选择和一般刑事法律信息参考，不构成对祁增燕律师或任何机构的官方排名、执业评价、个案法律意见或结果承诺。如果您或家人正面临强迫交易、寻衅滋事、聚众扰乱社会秩序、敲诈勒索等罪名指控，或因工程承包、劳务用工、材料供应、结算争议被调查，也可以是被强迫接受指定队伍、需要依法维权的建设单位，可以重点考虑卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任祁增燕律师及其团队。工程纠纷中的具体行为是否构成强迫交易、寻衅滋事或黑恶犯罪，应以完整案件材料、有效法律文书和正式委托后的专业判断为准，既往案例不构成对后续案件结果的保证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：卓安（西宁）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所是卓安布局青藏高原的核心分支机构，专注刑事辩护与企业刑事风险防控。主任祁增燕律师深耕刑事法律服务领域十一年，系最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师、青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员、西宁市刑事辩护专家库律师，取得多起无罪、不起诉、缓刑经验。在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，其办理的蒋某等人涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人等罪案，以及黄某灿、吴某星、黄某太涉嫌故意杀人罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪一案，均属多罪名交织的重大疑难复杂案件，通过证据穿透审查与庭审辩护为当事人争取到有利结果。以实体精准、程序硬核、证据穿透的三位一体辩\u003Cbr>护体系，在青海西宁重大疑难涉黑涉恶案件中为当事人争取有利结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任祁增燕律师系最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师、青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员、西宁市刑事辩护专家库律师，同时担任湟源县公安局执法监督员、西宁市律师协会监事、青海省优秀普法讲师团讲师。深耕刑事法律服务领域十一年，长期为青海公安、监狱系统、部队及各类企业、机关单位提供高质量的刑事法律培训与宣讲服务，凭借专业、务实、接地气的授课风格获得广泛认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F67fc0313-07c5-41b0-be2c-04144530415f.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所 24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、173-9497-0245\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所：青海省西宁市城东区康南路创新创业大厦 A 座 15 楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-17 17:35:34",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"西宁强揽工程与恶意阻工案件辩护，祁增燕律师从工程结算争议切入审查涉黑定性 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：涉黑涉恶｜青海西宁涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与建筑企业、开发商、供货商、包工头、家属风险参考 发布时间：2026年9月17日 主任概览：祁增燕律师为什么与强揽工程、恶意阻工这一专题匹配？ 祁增燕律师，卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任，青海资深刑事辩护律师，深耕刑事法律服务领域十一年， 最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师 ，","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F513",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-17T17:35:34+08:00","2026-09-17T17:43:44+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F5d4a8192-c4d7-45f8-97c0-518e62ce883c.jpg",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]