[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-481":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},481,"2026-09-16 18:04:30","手术台上加价被定涉恶敲诈？民营医院涉案，医生如何脱困？","https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789553039845.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">针对民营专科门诊在手术中要求增加付费被控涉恶敲诈勒索的重大争议，成安律师团队结合医疗与涉黑恶辩护实务指出：区分医疗消费欺诈与涉恶软暴力敲诈的核心，在于是否利用特殊物理场景对患者形成心理强制。面对恶势力犯罪集团的严峻指控，家属与涉案医护切忌盲目认罪，应及早由专业律师介入阅卷质证，穿透审查主观非法占有目的，精准区分主从犯地位，全力争取罪轻与从轻、减轻处罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>一、民营医院术中加价逼患者签协议，为何会被认定为涉恶敲诈勒索？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在民营专科医疗机构的日常运营中，男科、妇科、医美等消费型医疗领域一直是刑事风险高发的重灾区。为了追求高额的营业额与客单价，部分民营专科门诊推行所谓的“营销模式”，在患者躺在手术台上、手术进行到一半的关键时刻，以“发现严重病症、存在恶变坏死风险”为由，要求患者当场增加数千元乃至数万元的手术与修复项目。在许多涉案的医疗机构负责人、运营主管甚至是接诊主刀医生看来，这仅仅是民营医院为了多创收而采取的“过度医疗”或“夸大宣传”，甚至认为只要患者当场在《知情同意书》上签了字、刷了卡，就属于自愿接受医疗消费的民商事行为。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">然而，在司法实务与扫黑除恶常态化的强力打击下，这类看似披着“医疗协议”外衣的敛财套路，已被全国各级政法机关明确识破并予以严厉打击。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">我们可以通过全国轰动的民营医疗涉恶真实大案——银川市兴庆区人民法院（2020）宁 0104 刑初 332 号刑事判决，透视这一司法定性的根本转变：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">涉案的银川欧亚男健医院有限公司由苏益雄担任法定代表人，联合巨豪集团共同出资设立，由吴凤华、张建伟等人先后担任总经理，年建华、黄洪勇等人组成医院核心管理层。该医院自设立起，便全盘引入了所谓的“开发病人模式”。医院在内部设立了分工严密的网络客服部，雇佣无任何医学背景的人员，在网络上伪装成专业医生或以年轻女性形象搭讪，以虚假的“免费检查、低价手术”为诱饵，诱骗大量被害人到院就诊。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当被害人被导医带入诊室后，接诊医生与助理相互配合，通过篡改检验数据、使用虚假图谱伪造严重病情，诱导被害人接受普通的包皮环切等浅表手术。然而，真正的恶劣行为发生在手术室内——在手术进行过程中，主刀医生故意通过局部麻醉不足制造疼痛，或者在创口处于暴露、流血的极端状态下突然停刀，谎称患者阴茎内部神经病变、血管堵塞，若不当场加做上万元的“高频修复”或“神经微控手术”，将导致严重功能障碍甚至组织坏死。身处无菌手术室、赤身裸体躺在手术台上的被害人，因处于极度封闭、人身受限且对医学信息极度不对称的境地，产生极大的心理恐惧，被迫当场同意扫码转账或签下巨额手术知情同意书。更有甚者，对于术后未缴清费用的患者，医院通过控制输液速度、限制离开等手段变相逼迫缴费。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">经司法机关查实，该团伙在数年时间内以此类手段诈骗数百人，敲诈勒索数十人，累计非法敛财数额特别巨大，并致使数十名患者遭受不同程度的身体损伤。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">公安机关收网后，将该医院整个管理层及涉案医护人员共计 48 人全链条抓获。银川市兴庆区人民检察院在提起公诉时，直接将该组织定性为民营医疗行业恶势力犯罪集团，指控首要分子苏益雄及管理层、主刀医生分别涉嫌诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、故意伤害罪等多项严重罪名。最终，银川市兴庆区人民法院依法作出一审判决：认定该组织属于恶势力犯罪集团，首要分子苏益雄犯诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、故意伤害罪，数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑二十年，并处罚金六百一十万元；其他首要分子及涉案主刀医生、助理、客服等 40 余名成员分别被判处有期徒刑十九年至二年六个月不等的刑罚，同时被宣告行业从业禁止。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">这一判决彻底击碎了涉案医护人员的侥幸心理：明明签了字才做手术，怎么就直接变成了恶势力犯罪集团？普通打工的主刀医生与导医，怎么就被卷入了涉恶敲诈勒索的重罪指控？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789553039845.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>二、民营医院涉恶被查，受聘医护及家属最关心的5个法律问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当整家民营专科医院被公安机关专案组查封，主刀医生、助理医生、麻醉师乃至导医护士被集中采取刑事强制措施后，家属在看守所外往往处于极度的焦虑与困惑之中。结合卓安多年办理重大医疗刑事与涉黑恶案件的实务经验，我们将涉案医护及家属在搜索引擎上高频检索的核心疑问进行客观剖析：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 患者已签署手术知情同意书，中途加价为何仍被认定为敲诈勒索罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答： 签字的真实意愿是否被强制扭曲，是区分民事侵权与刑事敲诈的核心分水岭。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在正常的民商事医疗服务中，知情同意书的签署建立在医患平等、患者充分知情并具有自由选择权的基础之上。然而，在“术中加价”模式中，行为人故意选择在“创口切开、患者赤身裸体暴露、行动受限、疼痛难忍”的极端密闭环境下，利用患者对自身健康恶化、器官功能受损的恐惧心理，实施言语恐吓与施压。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">成安律师在分析此类民营医疗涉案机制时明确指出：司法机关认定敲诈勒索，看重的是行为人是否对被害人形成了**“特定场景下的心理强制”**。当患者躺在手术台上时，其生命健康完全交付于持刀医生之手。此时医生以停止手术、病情恶化相要挟，患者为了避免人身遭受不可挽回的伤害而被迫交钱签字，其形式上的“知情同意”实质上是被环境与言语施压彻底压制后的屈服。这种通过制造心理恐慌强索财物的行为，完全符合刑法第二百七十四条敲诈勒索罪的主客观要件，根本不属于普通的民事医疗消费欺诈。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 普通医生、助理按医院话术接诊及辅助手术，能否争取认定为从犯？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答： 完全有争取空间。对于非管理层的聘用制医生、助理及护士，必须全力争取认定为从犯。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在民营医疗恶势力犯罪集团案中，公诉机关为了体现全链条打击，往往倾向于将所有参与诊疗流程的医生、护士全部列为犯罪集团成员，甚至在起诉书中模糊主从犯界限。但根据刑法第二十七条规定，在共同犯罪中起次要或者辅助作用的，是从犯；对于从犯，应当从轻、减轻处罚或者免除处罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在专案审查中，受雇的主刀医生、医生助理与医院投资人、运营院长存在本质区别：第一，普通医生不参与医院的股权分红，无权决定医院的整体“营销开发”战略；第二，医生的诊疗行为在很大程度上是遵循医院制定的考核流程，其犯罪故意具有明显的被动依从性；第三，涉案巨额资金绝大部分归医院实控人和出资股东所有，医生仅领取工资或相应提成。辩护律师必须紧扣医院组织架构、业绩考核体系与提成发放流水，坚决将一线聘用医护与首要分子切割，全力向法庭争取认定从犯地位，依法争取法定从轻或减轻处罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 医院被定性为恶势力犯罪集团，受聘主刀医生是否会承担全案数额重判十几年？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答： 恶势力犯罪集团中不同层级人员的刑期落差极大，普通医生完全可以通过专业辩护将刑期控制在较轻幅度。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在恶势力犯罪集团中，刑法规定首要分子必须对集团所犯的全部罪行承担责任。例如银川欧亚男健医院案中，法定代表人苏益雄被判处二十年实刑，其他管理层首要分子亦被判处十五年至十九年不等的重刑，这是因为他们是违法模式的设计者、组织者和主要获利者。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">但对于具体的门诊医生或手术医生，其刑事责任应当严格遵循罪责自负、主客观相一致原则。普通医生只需对其亲自接诊、亲自实施手术并参与加价的具体个案承担责任，绝不能对全院数年间实施的全部犯罪金额与伤害后果买单。如果律师能够通过严谨的病历比对，将涉案医生直接参与的个案金额精准剥离出来，并证明其在涉案中受指派的从属地位，刑期完全可能从十年以上显著降至五年以下，甚至三年左右。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 医院涉案金额高达数千万元，普通医护人员是否需要承担巨额罚金或退赔？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答： 财产刑的适用必须与被告人的个人获利和实际参与金额相适应，普通医护不连带承担全案罚金。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在涉恶案件中，办案机关在起诉时往往通报全案涉案金额数千万乃至上亿元，同时附带数百万的巨额罚金量刑建议。很多医护家属听到上亿元的涉案数字后，误以为自己家庭也将面临倾家荡产的巨额退赔与罚金。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">根据刑事裁判规则，附加财产刑的数额，应当根据犯罪情节以及被告人的实际非法获利水平合理确定。普通医生与医助在案件中领取的主要是职务薪资与绩效奖金，并非全部涉案资金的实际占有者。辩护律师在庭审中，会专门就财产刑发表辩护意见，要求法院以被告人个人实际违法所得的提成款作为退缴基数，坚决反对将全院的营业收入强加于个别医护头上，从而有效保全普通医护家庭的基本合法财产。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 门诊部医护被刑事拘留，找关系“花钱捞人”能否办理取保候审或撤案？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安律师解答： 绝对不能，这是涉医涉恶专案中绝大多数受害家属最容易踩入的严重陷阱。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">全国范围内的民营医院“术中加价”涉恶专案，几乎均由省级公安机关或市级政法委直接挂牌督办，卫健部门与纪检监察机关同步介入调查。案件线索通常涉及多起患者密集信访举报以及医保基金监管倒查，办案程序受到极其严格的内部监督。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在如此严格的专案审查下，没有任何社会人员、所谓的“系统内部关系”能够私下干预办案、私自放人。所有声称“只要花几十万就能把主刀医生以‘医疗纠纷’名义办取保或撤案”的，无一例外全是利用家属恐慌心理实施的诈骗。家属此时如果把资金交给掮客，不仅人出不来，还会彻底耽误聘请专业刑事律师介入审查起诉、核减犯罪数额的宝贵时机。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>三、法院审理医疗“术中加价”涉恶案件的司法审查标准与量刑基准\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">人民法院在审理涉及民营医院“术中加价”、“虚构病情”等涉恶案件时，有着极其严密、穿透式的审查标准，绝不会仅凭一张被害人签过字的《手术知情同意书》就认定为合法的医疗行为。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）定性规则：手术室特殊场景下的“心理强制”与敲诈勒索罪的认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">根据最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理实施“软暴力”刑事案件若干问题的指导意见》，司法机关在认定医疗领域的涉恶软暴力敲诈勒索时，核心审查以下三大维度：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>审查物理空间的封闭性与人身受限程度：案发场景是否处于手术室这一高度封闭、外界无法介入的特定空间。患者是否赤身裸体、处于麻醉状态或创口暴露状态。如果在患者人身活动受到实质限制的生理弱势环境下突然提出加价，司法解释直接将其推定为足以使人产生恐慌的“胁迫手段”；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>审查医学信息差的恶意利用与病情虚构：主刀医生主张加做手术的理由，是真实的临床指征，还是纯粹为了敛财而伪造的假象。如果医院通过使用假显微图谱、化验单造假、或者将正常的生理组织谎称为恶性病变，以此恐吓患者，则完全证实其主观上具有追求不法利益的非法占有目的；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>审查恶势力犯罪集团的组织性特征：医院是否形成了以出资人、总经理为首要分子，以科室主任、主刀医生为骨干，以导医、客服为辅助的违法犯罪组织。如果全院制定了统一的话术培训、规定了单体患者的最低考核指标，将违法加价行为常态化、制度化，人民法院依法直接将其认定为恶势力犯罪集团。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）民营医疗涉恶犯罪各岗位人员法定刑对比与辩护路径分析\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">为了让大家清晰了解医院涉案后不同岗位人员在审判中的量刑定位与辩护方向，我们整理了如下对比分析：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto; line-height: 2;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>涉案人员岗位\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>核心行为与指控罪名\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>法定基准刑与政策预期\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安实务辩护主攻路径\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>预期裁判与实体量刑效果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>实控人 \u002F 总经理（首要分子）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">投资控股、制定全院商业模式、下达创收指标，涉嫌诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、故意伤害罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">十五年至二十年有期徒刑，没收全部财产或处数百万巨额罚金，从严惩处\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">穿透审计营业额，剥离合规基础医疗收入；论证部分个案系下属过度发挥，核减敲诈金额\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">法院依法按集团所犯全部罪行处罚，但通过数额核减可避免适用顶格财产刑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>运营院长 \u002F 门诊主任（骨干主犯）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">负责科室日常排班、话术培训、推行术中加价流程，涉嫌诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">十年至十五年有期徒刑，并处罚金\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">论证系受雇于投资人、无股权收益；在全案决策中起执行作用，争取认定为地位较低的主犯\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">依法在法定刑幅度内予以从轻，打破最高刑期指控预期\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>受聘主刀医生（涉案医护）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在手术中配合夸大病情、制造疼痛逼迫患者现场交费加做手术，涉嫌敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">五年至十年有期徒刑，涉案金额巨大，可能附带故意伤害罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">力主从犯地位；严格将指控范围限定在其本人亲自主刀的个案，坚决排除故意伤害罪名\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">成功认定为从犯，剥离故意伤害，在三年至五年低位量刑，并大幅压低罚金\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>医生助理 \u002F 麻醉师 \u002F 护士（辅助人员）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">协助固定患者、递送同意书、催促刷卡、按指令控制输液速度，涉嫌敲诈勒索罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制，并处罚金\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">论证对全案犯罪模式缺乏主观认知，系履职过程中的辅助过失，主张情节显著轻微\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">认定为从犯，依法争取相对不起诉，或判处较短有期徒刑并适用缓刑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>网络客服 \u002F 导医人员（吸粉引流）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在网络上冒充医生、使用虚假女性头像搭讪诱导患者到院，涉嫌诈骗罪\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑（数额巨大）或三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制（数额较大）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">论证仅从事前端引流，完全不知晓手术室内部的术中加价敲诈行为，切断共同犯罪链条\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">排除敲诈勒索与伤害共犯责任，仅按普通涉案从犯处理，争取三年以下轻刑或缓刑\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>四、民营医疗涉恶犯罪权威司法裁判规则与典型判例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在面对民营专科医院有组织实施的“套路医”犯罪时，最高人民法院与最高人民检察院通过一系列典型案例指导，确立了精细化的司法定性规则。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 医疗领域涉恶软暴力与“套路医”犯罪的司法认定规则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cul>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>最高人民法院关于打击“套路医”犯罪指导要旨：对于医疗机构采用虚假检查、虚构病症、夸大病情等手段，在就诊初期诱骗患者就医并收取费用的，依法应当认定为诈骗罪；对于在手术过程中利用患者病患体弱、创口暴露等特殊处境，以停止治疗、病情恶化相威胁，强迫患者在手术台上接受高价治疗并缴费的，应当依法认定为敲诈勒索罪；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的指导意见》明确规定： 恶势力犯罪集团的认定，必须严格审查成员之间的层级与组织性。对于在涉案医疗机构中从事正常医疗、护理等辅助性工作，主观上无明显为非作恶故意、未获取高额非法提成的普通从业人员，不应认定为恶势力犯罪集团成员；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 过度医疗与刑事犯罪的界限规程： 司法机关在办理民营医院案件时，必须严格委托第三方专业法医鉴定机构，对患者实际受损情况进行医学司法鉴定。严禁将正规治疗方案中的并发症、因个体差异导致的治疗效果不佳，随意推定为故意伤害罪或诈骗罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 典型实办案例复盘：银川欧亚男健医院涉恶集团案普通医护从轻辩护分析\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在银川欧亚男健医院涉恶集团案中，案件的指控规模与审判结果，为全国类似案件的辩护提供了深刻的实战镜鉴：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>案件的指控体量与司法定性：宁夏银川市兴庆区人民检察院指控，银川欧亚男健医院在苏益雄、吴凤华等人的组织管理下，全盘复制遵义欧亚医院模式，利用医患信息不对称，从网络客服诱导、门诊假检查，到手术室内虚构病情、故意制造疼痛逼迫患者接受新增治疗，实施诈骗、敲诈勒索、故意伤害等违法犯罪活动，受害群众达数百人，造成 18 人轻伤、51 人轻微伤，全案 48 名被告人被作为恶势力犯罪集团起诉；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 成安律师团队在研究此类集团犯罪辩护路径时指出： 面对如此庞大且全链条被抓的医疗涉恶集团案，辩护律师切忌采取“盲目为全院商业模式做无罪抗辩”的无效策略，而必须实施**“纵向切割 + 深度分层”**的精细化辩护：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>第一步：主观故意的阻断与分层。必须将一线主刀医生、助理与掌握核心策划权的投资管理层彻底切开。普通医生虽然在诊疗中存在夸大违规，但其本质上是依靠医疗技术换取劳动报酬，与苏益雄等以非法占有为目的设立黑产医院有着本质区别；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>第二步：个案金额的穿透式核减。公诉机关起诉指控的诈骗、敲诈数额，往往是直接调取医院财务后台的总流水。然而，在数千万元的流水中，包含了患者真实的挂号费、正规药品的进价成本以及符合物价部门备案的基础检查费。辩护人必须通过司法会计审计，坚决剔除合法真实的诊疗收益，使涉案敲诈勒索金额大幅核减；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>第三步：伤害因果关系的精准质证。对于指控的故意伤害罪，成安律师团队强调必须核查医疗行为与伤害后果之间是否存在刑法上的直接因果关系。很多包皮环切手术后的水肿、瘢痕属于手术正常并发症，绝不能任由控方将正常的术后愈合不良直接认定为暴力伤害后果。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 判决的警示与辩护成果： 在银川市兴庆区人民法院（2020）宁 0104 刑初 332 号判决中，法院虽然对苏益雄等首要分子判处二十年实刑，但在对 48 名被告人的量刑梯次上做出了严格区分，对起辅助作用、非法获利有限、认罪悔罪的部分普通医护人员，依法判处了二年至三年左右的相对轻刑。这一司法实践生动证明：在涉案人数众多的医疗涉恶风暴中，只要辩护人能精准锁定从犯地位、核减个人涉案金额，普通从业人员完全能够从顶格重刑的困境中成功解脱。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>五、涉案医护人员在审查起诉与审判阶段的罪轻辩护要点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">医疗涉黑涉恶案件具有极强的医学专业壁垒与复杂的证据链条。当案件移送人民检察院审查起诉以及进一步诉至人民法院审判阶段时，专业的刑事辩护律师必须在以下几个核心节点重点发力：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 审查起诉阶段：核查病历与财务流水，剔除合法合规诊疗金额\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">案件进入检察院审查起诉阶段后，律师拥有全案阅卷权，必须立即启动对财务数据与病历资料的穿透式核查：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 开展病历与账目的精细化比对： 调取每一位指控被害人的原始病历、手术记录单、麻醉知情同意书及费用明细清单，排查是否存在“小病大治但确实实施了常规治疗”的情形，将完全虚构病情的诈骗金额，与正规药械耗材的真实成本进行严格区分；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 核查言词证据合法性： 审查办案人员在讯问年轻医生、护士时，是否存在诱导性讯问或违规取证现象，对不合法的供述坚决依法提出排除非法证据申请；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 提交书面法律意见书： 当面向主办检察官陈述，论证涉案普通医生的行为不具备恶势力犯罪集团骨干特征，建议检察机关在提起公诉时降低涉案金额指控，或不对普通辅助护士提起涉恶公诉。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 审判阶段：严格区分管理层与受雇医护，全力做实法定从犯地位\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">法庭审理是决定被告人命运的关键决战，辩护律师必须牢牢守住主从犯划分的底线：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 当庭拆解绩效分配体系： 向法庭出示医院的规章制度、股东分红协议与薪酬流水，证明医生仅拿固定底薪与提成，涉案营业款全额进入股东控制账户，证实医生在整个犯罪链条中仅仅是受雇佣的执行人员；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 瓦解组织层级依附性： 证明聘用制医生随时可以辞职离职，与医院投资人之间纯属普通的雇佣劳动关系，未签署任何涉恶协议，不存在违法犯罪组织的严密人身控制；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 争取法定从轻、减轻处罚： 依据刑法第二十七条，当庭发表从犯辩护意见，促使合议庭依法对普通医护适用从轻或法定减轻处罚，在较低刑档内量刑，打破涉恶案件一律重判的严苛预期。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong> 伤情因果关系抗辩：严格区分故意伤害与术后并发症，排除不当罪名\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">面对故意伤害罪的严重指控，律师必须运用医学专业知识展开证据反击：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 申请重新鉴定或专家辅助人出庭： 对公安机关出具的轻伤、轻微伤法医学鉴定意见书进行专业质证，审查伤情是否由原发疾病引起，是否属于手术技术水平有限导致的并发症，坚决排除将普通医疗过失上升为故意伤害犯罪；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 争取罪名吸收与从宽裁判： 论证术中加价行为如果已被敲诈勒索罪评价，轻微的身体创口不应再单独重复评价为故意伤害罪，力争法庭择一重罪从轻处罚，避免数罪并罚导致刑期过长。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>六、涉案医护人员及家属应对涉恶调查的3个自救原则\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">当民营医院突然遭到查封，家庭中的医生、医助或管理人员被专案组带走，家属在看守所外面对的是极具震慑力的涉恶司法审查。若在此危急关头慌乱应对，往往会直接毁掉当事人的自救希望。家属必须恪守以下三大危机应对原则：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（一）初查排查阶段：妥善保管合规执业凭据，切勿篡改或销毁病历\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">一旦获悉门诊部或医院被公安机关立案核查，医护人员与家属必须保持绝对清醒：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 全面封存并备份合规执业证据： 第一时间将当事人的《医师资格证书》、《医师执业证书》、正规诊疗培训记录、真实病历底单、手术排班表以及能够证明其曾向管理层提出“合规诊疗、规范手术”的微信工作记录进行安全备份；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 严厉警告：切忌擅自删除医院系统数据或串通修改病历！ 当前的公安网警与经侦技术具备成熟的大数据恢复与服务器镜像固定能力。任何私下篡改电子处方、销毁纸质病历、与其他医护人员“对台词”的行为，不仅会被专案组取证固定，还会被直接定性为“具备高度反侦查意识的恶势力组织特征”，甚至导致家属因涉嫌“帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪”被一同采取强制措施。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（二）侦查羁押阶段：及早委托专业律师会见，严防“托关系捞人”诈骗陷阱\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">亲人被送进看守所后，家属面临信息阻断，切勿病急乱投医：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 认清涉医涉恶专案的体制刚性： 在常态化扫黑除恶机制下，公检法对医疗乱象案件实行严格的案件质量终身负责制，纪检监察机关全程随案监督。在当前的司法红线下，没有任何社会人员、关系户能够通过私下打招呼把涉案人员违规释放。所有声称“交几十万就能办取保撤案”的，无一例外全是利用家属恐慌心理实施的诈骗；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 切勿让在押亲属盲目全盘揽罪： 在看守所内，办案人员讯问强度极大。家属应尽早委托专业刑事辩护律师前往看守所依法会见，由律师向当事人提供规范的诉讼权利指导，指导其在面对审讯时实事求是陈述诊疗过程，是自己做的主动交代，不是自己做的坚决不盲目认领，不扩大责任，亦不替管理层首要分子承担责任。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>（三）退赔退缴阶段：严格区分正常薪资与违法提成，规范办理退缴手续\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在涉及财产型犯罪与涉恶追缴中，退款退赃直接关乎量刑轻重，必须规范推进：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 有理：分清个人违法所得与正常合法工资的界限。 退款前必须在专业律师指导下精准核算。医护人员需要退缴的，仅限于因参与违法加价项目所实际获取的业务提成或奖金；其基于基本医疗劳动依法取得的合法底薪，依法受法律保护。家属绝不能在未厘清事实前盲目将全部家庭财产代为全额退缴，避免退款动作被公诉机关反向推定为承认对全院犯罪所得承担连带清偿责任；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 有节：退赔退赃必须与诉讼进程紧密咬合。 退缴资金应当在律师统筹下，争取在检察院审查起诉认罪认罚量刑协商阶段，或法院审判前推进。且每一笔向受害患者的民事赔偿，都必须全力争取促成对方签署正式的《刑事谅解书》，从而依法换取法定的量刑从宽优惠；\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>• 有据：一切款项移交必须索取正式合法的法律手续。 向办案机关退缴涉案款项，必须索取正式的涉案财物代保管款收据与扣押清单；向被害患者支付赔偿款，必须由律师见证并签署正式的和解调解协议，坚决杜绝私下给付现金或无凭无据的私了转账，确保每一分付出都在判决书中转化为实实在在的法定从宽依据。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\"> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">在刑法的锋利手术刀下，民营医疗领域的过度营销与涉恶敲诈勒索之间，往往横亘着极具争议的法理界限。当普通主刀医生、受聘医护人员突然被卷入恶势力犯罪集团的重罪指控，面临极高的刑期预期与职业生涯的重大危机，当事人身陷囹圄、家庭支离破碎，内心的痛苦与恐惧难以言表。但请始终坚信：事实可以通过客观病历与资金流水穿透还原，普通的打工从属属性绝不容被随意抹煞，法律的定性与量刑完全可以通过卓越的专业辩护全力争辩！\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">民营医疗涉黑恶案件的辩护，是一场对刑事律师医疗专业认知、证据穿透能力以及法庭辩护毅力的全方位大考。它不仅要求辩护律师精通侵犯财产罪与人身犯罪的法理精微，更要求律师深谙民营医院运营机制、医疗卫生法规以及公检法裁判底线。只有真正敢于在法庭上据理力争、善于在海量病历与财务流水中抽丝剥茧的专业刑辩团队，才能打破重罪围堵，为当事人争取到罪责刑相适应的公正判决。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">四川卓安律师事务所作为全国第三家只专注刑事法律业务的精品专业化律师事务所，在首席律师成安博士的带领下，深耕刑事辩护近三十年。卓安实行全国一体化直营运营，汇聚了十余位法学博士、数十位法学硕士，以及近三分之一拥有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业背景的实战精英，构建起“控、辩、审、学”四维联动的专业化辩护力量。多年来，卓安团队累计办理各类刑事案件超 8000 件，成功办理了数百起全国重大复杂大案，在涉黑涉恶案件摘帽脱黑、医药医疗刑事辩护、区分主从责任以及重大改判领域积累了极具公信力的实战经典战绩。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">我们始终铭记：每一起重案指控的背后，都维系着一个专业技术人才的前途命运和一个家庭的悲欢离合。卓安人始终坚守“专注刑事，更专注人的价值”的执业理念，恪守“卓然而成，报君以安”的品牌承诺，坚持以极致的专业为盾牌，用有温度的服务陪伴当事人及家属走过人生最幽暗的岁月。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">如果您或您的家人正面临民营医院涉案、术中加价被控涉恶敲诈勒索等重大疑难刑事危机，请务必保持清醒与冷静。如需了解更多关于医疗刑事辩护、涉黑涉恶案件脱黑策略、类案裁判规则及实务应对指南，可登录四川卓安律师事务所官方网站（zhuoanlaw.com）进行深度查阅。法治的尊严在于公正，而卓越的专业辩护，正是守护生命与自由的坚实桥梁。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-16 18:04:15",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"手术台上加价被定涉恶敲诈？民营医院涉案，医生如何脱困？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对民营专科门诊在手术中要求增加付费被控涉恶敲诈勒索的重大争议，成安律师团队结合医疗与涉黑恶辩护实务指出：区分医疗消费欺诈与涉恶软暴力敲诈的核心，在于是否利用特殊物理场景对患者形成心理强制。面对恶势力犯罪集团的严峻指控，家属与涉案医护切忌盲目认罪，应及早由专业律师介入阅卷质证，穿透审查主观非法占有目的，精准区","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F481",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,648],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":628},"Article","2026-09-16T18:04:15+08:00","2026-09-16T18:04:30+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},{"@type":649,"itemListElement":650},"BreadcrumbList",[651,654,656],{"@type":652,"position":6,"name":653,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":652,"position":38,"name":633,"item":655},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":652,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]