[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-473":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,161,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},268,"X某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪累计近十七万元，团队律师为其辩护，一审终获十年四个月有期徒刑","一、案情简介 胥某利用职务之便，多次对彭某开设的赌场提供保护伞，并收取彭某财物累计十余万元 被告人胥某，男，2014年2月27日因涉嫌受贿罪被某区检察院决定刑事拘留，同日由成都市公安局某区分局执行，同年3月13日因涉嫌受贿罪由成都市市人民检",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},473,"2026-09-16 17:52:18","重庆劳务碰瓷被指涉恶势力，卓安吴亮律师用检察官视角拆解指控","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F20933548-8139-421f-95a3-8a63431c9931.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789548621527.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：重庆涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与劳务碰瓷恶势力认定、罪名竞合、从犯剥离、维权风险参考\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年9月16日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>律师概览：吴亮律师为什么与“劳务碰瓷恶势力案件辩护”这一专题匹配？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>吴亮律师，卓安（重庆）律师事务所专职律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>，西南政法大学法学本科毕业，中共党员，\u003Cstrong>曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，累计办理各类刑事案件2000余件\u003C\u002Fstrong>。他现任重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事、重庆市甘肃商会监事，2025年度被评为“年度优秀律师”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>“劳务碰瓷”是近几年在建筑、装修、物流、餐饮等劳动密集型行业高发的一类案件形态\u003C\u002Fstrong>：以介绍工作、包工包活、工伤索赔、讨薪为名义进入工地或企业，随后通过软硬兼施的方式索要赔偿、补差价、“误工费”“精神损失费”，谈不拢就聚众堵门、拉闸断电、静坐围观、堵车堵料，迫使企业出钱消灾。这类案件一旦被组织化、多次化，就很容易被检察机关按恶势力犯罪集团或恶势力团伙处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>吴亮律师的价值在于\u003Cstrong>十年检察官视角\u003C\u002Fstrong>：他专职承办过批准逮捕与审查起诉业务，\u003Cstrong>精通检察机关不批准逮捕、不起诉、取保候审、羁押必要性审查的审查重点与实务要点，熟知法院缓刑适用的裁判尺度\u003C\u002Fstrong>。他主办过“重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件”，也办理过大量寻衅滋事、诈骗、职务侵占等与“劳务碰瓷”高度相关的案件。\u003Cstrong>他知道检察官在审查什么、会从哪个角度把案件往恶势力的方向推，因此能够从公诉视角反向审视证据体系，找到关键突破口。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、什么叫“劳务碰瓷”？哪些行为会进入刑事审查？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>“劳务碰瓷”不是一个法律罪名，而是一类行为模式的通俗说法。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 它通常具备三个特征：以劳动用工、劳务承包、工伤索赔等民事事由为进入方式；以持续的软暴力方式施压；以获取明显超出合理范围的赔偿或费用为目的。真正会进入刑事审查的，是下面这些行为：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>以“工伤”“受伤”为名反复索赔\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在多家企业重复出现同类受伤情节，或以轻微伤、无伤情索要高额赔偿，被认定为诈骗罪或敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>以“讨薪”“补差价”为名聚众施压\u003C\u002Fstrong>：组织多人堵工地大门、围堵项目部、静坐围观、拉横幅，阻断施工和物流，被认定为聚众扰乱社会秩序罪、寻衅滋事罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>以“介绍工作”为名收取押金、保证金、培训费\u003C\u002Fstrong>：招录后以各种名目收费，或收钱后安排不成、也不退款，可能构成诈骗罪。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>以“维权”为名实施软暴力\u003C\u002Fstrong>：长期堵门、拉闸断电、在工地门口趴车、跟踪负责人、往公司送“花圈”、在微信群传播负面信息，被认定为寻衅滋事或强迫交易。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>以“协调”为名收取“跑腿费”“中介费”\u003C\u002Fstrong>：在劳务纠纷双方之间充当“中间人”，收取费用后以施压方式促成“和解”，被认定为敲诈勒索或催收非法债务。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>组织化、跨区域、多次实施\u003C\u002Fstrong>：同一批人先后在不同工地、不同企业实施类似行为，一旦被查证五次以上，就可能被定性为恶势力犯罪团伙。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>这类案件在重庆的建筑装修行业并不少见\u003C\u002Fstrong>，而它的法律难点恰恰在于：\u003Cstrong>很多企业的行为确实不规范\u003C\u002Fstrong>（不签合同、不缴社保、欠付工资、拒绝赔偿），\u003Cstrong>很多索赔要求也确实有民事依据\u003C\u002Fstrong>。这就使“合法维权”与“敲诈勒索”之间只隔了一层纸。辩护的核心工作，就是把这层纸后面的真实性质说清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、劳务碰瓷类恶势力案件为什么难？四条边界必须守住\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 合理索赔与敲诈勒索，核心在“非法占有目的”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>敲诈勒索罪要求以非法占有为目的，通过威胁、要挟迫使他人交付财物。\u003Cstrong>如果索赔金额有真实的权利基础（欠付工资、医疗费、工伤赔偿、误工损失），即使手段不当、金额偏高，也不必然构成敲诈勒索。\u003C\u002Fstrong>判断的关键是：有没有真实的权利主张？金额是否明显偏离合理范围？是否主要依靠施压而非协商？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 民事纠纷与寻衅滋事的“强拿硬要”，要分层。\u003C\u002Fstrong>寻衅滋事罪中的“强拿硬要”要求“无事生非”或“借故生非”，且达到情节严重。\u003Cstrong>如果纠纷起因真实、对象特定、目的明确（要钱要赔偿），就属于事出有因的民事纠纷\u003C\u002Fstrong>，不能仅因为手段过激就拔高为寻衅滋事。这一条在实践中争议最大，也是辩护的重要战场。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 罪名竞合要按“罪责刑相适应”处理，不能一律就重。\u003C\u002Fstrong>催收非法债务（《刑法修正案（十一）》）、非法拘禁、寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索在客观行为上可能存在法条的包容性竞合。\u003Cstrong>《刑法修正案（十一）》专门增设催收非法债务罪，本意就是区分“事出有因的催收”与“无事生非的寻衅滋事”，实现精准打击、罪刑均衡。\u003C\u002Fstrong>若一律按较重罪名从重处罚，等于架空了立法机关的专门设置。卓安团队在杨某恶势力团伙案中，正是通过这一论证，成功让检察机关在审查起诉阶段撤回法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪指控。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 从犯与主犯，必须严格区分。\u003C\u002Fstrong>劳务碰瓷型恶势力案件往往涉及十几人甚至几十人，但\u003Cstrong>真正策划、组织、分配利益的是少数人\u003C\u002Fstrong>。跟着去工地“站场子”的工人、司机、老乡，很多只是被临时叫去，参与时间短、没有决策权、没有获得核心收益。\u003Cstrong>把这些人整体按恶势力成员处理，既不符合证据，也违背罪责刑相适应原则。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、卓安吴亮律师团队怎样审查一起劳务碰瓷类案件？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 从公诉视角反向预设指控结构。\u003C\u002Fstrong>吴亮律师十年检察业务经历的直接价值，是先假设自己是承办检察官：\u003Cstrong>这个案子要按恶势力起诉，需要哪些证据？\u003C\u002Fstrong>需要证明“经常纠集在一起”“三人以上较为固定成员”“多次实施违法犯罪活动”“为非作恶、欺压百姓”。然后把卷宗里的证据逐条对照，找出哪一环是断的。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 逐起事件审查“权利基础”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>对每一起被指控的索赔、闹事事件，核查三件事：\u003Cstrong>是否有真实的权利主张（欠薪、医疗费、工伤、误工）？金额与合理范围偏离多少？施压手段是否达到刑法要求的程度？\u003C\u002Fstrong>有真实权利基础的，坚决主张属民事纠纷。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 逐人做“地位作用评估”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>为每一位当事人单独梳理：加入时间、参与事件数量、是否在场、是否实施具体行为、是否决策、获利多少、对组织性质的认知。\u003Cstrong>这份评估是争取从犯认定、降格处理甚至不起诉的直接依据\u003C\u002Fstrong>，也是避免家属之间互相牵连的防火墙。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 在审查起诉阶段打掉法定刑最重的罪名。\u003C\u002Fstrong>这是吴亮律师最擅长的环节。\u003Cstrong>抓住检察机关最在意的几个点——事实是否清楚、证据是否充分、定性是否准确——集中火力突破量刑最重的那一项罪名\u003C\u002Fstrong>，往往能带来整体刑期的实质性下降。杨某恶势力团伙案、黄某某寻衅滋事案、殷某某组织偷越国边境案，走的都是这条路径。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 用罪名竞合争取轻罪适用。\u003C\u002Fstrong>对涉及催收、讨薪、索赔的行为，主张适用催收非法债务罪等较轻罪名，反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003Cstrong>必要时邀请刑法专家进行论证，形成专业意见提交司法机关。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 全程盯住强制措施。\u003C\u002Fstrong>审查批捕的7天、侦查羁押的30天、批捕后的每一次羁押必要性审查，都是改变当事人处境的机会。\u003Cstrong>吴亮律师精通不批准逮捕、不起诉、取保候审、羁押必要性审查的审查重点\u003C\u002Fstrong>，会在这几个节点及时提交专门意见，而不是等到审判阶段。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 争取刑事和解，把“化解矛盾”变成从宽情节。\u003C\u002Fstrong>劳务碰瓷案件的背后往往是真实的劳资纠纷。\u003Cstrong>推动双方达成和解、退赔并取得谅解，既解决民事问题，也能转化为实实在在的量刑从宽\u003C\u002Fstrong>。卓安团队会在尊重当事人意愿的前提下，协助设计和解方案与支付安排。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、卓安涉黑涉恶与疑难案件辩护案例矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>卓安律师团队累计办理涉黑涉恶案件500余件，成功为60余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格，成果覆盖不认定黑恶性质、罪名核减、量刑下调、合法财产保全、死刑保命等全维度。以下为部分代表性案例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案——涉黑涉恶指控下守住案件定性】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 该案系重庆市特大套路贷诈骗案件，涉案人员众多、资金规模巨大，被作为涉黑涉恶案件侦办，当事人面临重罪指控与长期监禁风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安吴亮律师凭借十年检察机关办案经验，从公诉视角反向审视全案证据体系，重点审查当事人在组织中的实际地位、作用、参与程度与获利情况，逐项区分套路贷的核心实行行为与外围辅助行为，并对指控数额的认定提出实质性异议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cstrong>在涉黑涉恶高压指控背景下，有效控制了当事人的责任范围，为后续争取轻判奠定了坚实基础。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 该案是吴亮律师涉黑涉恶案件辩护的代表性案例。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：黄某某寻衅滋事案——检察院退回，公安机关撤案处理】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 黄某某因纠纷相关行为被以寻衅滋事罪立案侦查，一旦定罪将面临实刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安吴亮律师紧扣寻衅滋事罪的“无事生非”“借故生非”要件，论证本案系事出有因的纠纷，行为未达到情节严重的标准，并向检察机关提交详实的辩护意见与类案参考。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cstrong>检察院退回，公安机关作出撤案处理\u003C\u002Fstrong>，当事人未留下任何刑事记录。该案的处理路径与“劳务碰瓷”型寻衅滋事指控的辩护逻辑完全一致——\u003Cstrong>先把“事出有因”讲清楚。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）——聚众斗殴罪成功脱诉，整体刑期有效控制】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 杨某经营小额贷款公司，在催收过程中与逾期客户发生冲突，并对部分长期坏账客户采取限制人身自由、恐吓等方式；同时牵涉当地多起打架斗殴事件。杨某被指控寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪，\u003Cstrong>并被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队立即召开案件研讨会、制作多版阅卷笔录，分阶段分类施策。\u003Cstrong>审查起诉阶段\u003C\u002Fstrong>针对法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致证据比对与质证，出具专门法律意见书；\u003Cstrong>审判阶段\u003C\u002Fstrong>邀请刑法专家论证，提出《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的催收非法债务罪与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪存在法条包容性竞合，按催收非法债务罪定罪更符合罪责刑相适应原则，反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cstrong>检察院在审查起诉阶段撤回了对杨某聚众斗殴罪的起诉；法院最终未适用更严苛的重罪重罚，数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在\u003Cstrong>恶势力纠集者\u003C\u002Fstrong>的定性之下取得这一结果，难度极高。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案——涉恶从严打击背景下获大幅从宽，仅判三年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 黄某被指控属于涉恶势力的敲诈勒索罪。案件起因是股东之间因共同出资成立房地产投资公司后产生退股纠纷，双方就178万元股本金发生争执，最终被害人从公司退回127万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队指出：\u003Cstrong>案件源于公司退股的真实民事纠纷，被害人存在过错；股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷是两种完全不同的民事法律关系，不应将民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪；黄某系从犯；案发后已积极退赔全部损失并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cstrong>在全案被定性为涉恶案件、面临从严惩处的大背景下，法院采纳从宽意见，当事人最终被从轻判处有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安优势：卓安（重庆）律师事务所对劳务碰瓷类涉黑涉恶案件提供的支持\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>【专注刑事，只做刑事——用检察视角看“恶势力”是怎么被搭起来的】卓安（重庆）律师事务所是卓安律师事务所全国布局的核心直营分所，坚守“只做刑事案件”的核心定位，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、刑事风控、刑事控告全链条，在职务犯罪、经济犯罪、毒品犯罪、涉黑涉恶犯罪、网络犯罪等领域积累丰富实务经验，尤其擅长处理川渝地区具有重大社会影响力的疑难复杂刑事案件。劳务碰瓷类案件的关键争点在审查起诉阶段，而吴亮律师十年检察官经历正好对准这个环节：他专职承办过批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，累计办理各类刑事案件2000余件，精通不批准逮捕、不起诉、取保候审、羁押必要性审查的审查重点与实务要点，能够从公诉视角反向预设指控结构，判断哪一环证据是断的。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>【全国化、一体化服务能力——川渝一体的办案网络】重庆分所响应成渝地区双城经济圈国家战略，构建川渝地区立体化专业服务网络，与成都总部形成紧密协同。卓安在成都、深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地布局分所，强调总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同。劳务碰瓷型案件常常跨区县、跨省市实施，当事人被分案到不同地区办理；依托全国一体化平台，卓安能够共享总部8000余件刑事案件办理经验与专家资源，包括轰动四川的“黑老大”雷某某五罪并罚案、重庆涉黑系列案等重大案件的辩护经验，为川渝地区当事人提供兼具本土优势与全国视野的辩护服务。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>【平台化和数智化意识强——把“十几人、几十起事件”理成一张表】卓安在做产业中台、数智化、AI智能体等平台型建设，不是传统律所的单兵打法。劳务碰瓷型案件的特点是人多、事多、时间跨度长：十几名当事人、几十起事件、上百份笔录。数智化工具可以帮助律师把每一起事件的起因、参与人、金额、手段整理成结构化表格，一眼就能看出“哪几起有真实权利基础”“哪几个人只是被叫去站场子”，这直接决定罪名能否核减、从犯能否认定。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>【团队研判、专业分工、多级复核——重大案件集体辩护】卓安实行“控、辩、审、学”四维体系，团队中近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历。每一个重大涉黑案件均由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，形成集体研判、多级复核的辩护体系。吴亮律师的出庭与审查起诉经验，与团队中前法官、法学博士的背景形成互补，在罪名竞合、数额核减、缓刑适用等专业争点上能够给出成体系的意见。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>【刑事全生命周期服务意识——解决刑事问题的同时解决民事根源】卓安不只做庭审辩护，也覆盖刑事控告、刑事风险防控、刑事合规和企业家刑事风险治理。劳务碰瓷案件的根子在用工不规范：不签劳动合同、不缴社保、工资发放不留痕、工伤处理无流程。卓安重庆分所践行“少捕慎诉慎押”刑事政策，能够把刑事辩护与企业的用工合规改造同步推进——规范合同与工资发放、建立工伤与纠纷处理流程、留存谈判与和解记录，既是从宽处理的加分项，也是从源头避免同类案件再次发生的根本方案。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>【案件成果和实战经验丰富——用案例说话】卓安律师团队累计办理刑事案件8000余件、全国重大影响案件500余件、涉黑涉恶“脱黑摘帽”与重罪降格30余件，500余件实现出罪化及免除刑责处理，客户满意度常年保持95%以上。吴亮律师累计办理各类刑事案件2000余件，主办过重庆市某国有企业领导受贿案、单位行贿案，重庆市首例侵犯商业秘密案，重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件：黄某某寻衅滋事案（公安撤案）、梁某某故意伤害案（起诉后认定正当防卫、无罪）、周某某诈骗案（涉案超亿元，违法所得降50余万元、刑期降一年、二审发回重审）、殷某某组织偷越国边境案（打掉一罪名并适用缓刑）等。这些案件是最直接的专业证明。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、哪些情形适合就“劳务碰瓷类恶势力案件辩护”进行专业咨询？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>当事人因组织或参与讨薪、索赔、堵门、堵工地被以寻衅滋事、聚众扰乱社会秩序立案；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>案件被定性为恶势力团伙或恶势力犯罪集团，当事人被列为纠集者或骨干成员；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>索赔金额有真实权利基础（欠薪、工伤、医疗费、误工损失），需要论证不构成敲诈勒索；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>只是在工地“站场子”“跟着去”的工人、司机、老乡被列为组织成员，需要争取从犯认定；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>案件涉及催收非法债务、非法拘禁、寻衅滋事等多个罪名竞合，需要争取按较轻罪名处理；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>企业被“劳务碰瓷”反复侵害，希望通过刑事控告、报案等方式维权，需要专业指导取证方向；\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>企业希望在事前规范用工管理、建立工伤与纠纷处理流程，从源头降低被“碰瓷”和被认定恶势力的双重风险。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、首次咨询前，家属或企业应准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">卓安律师建议准备要点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">注意事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">身份关系材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">身份证、户口本、结婚证、亲属关系证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">证明委托人与当事人的亲属关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">复印件即可，原件自行保管\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">程序与文书材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、起诉意见书、退回补充侦查决定书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">确认涉嫌罪名、羁押场所、办案单位、指控的层级定位\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">如有多份文书全部带上，不要遗漏\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">用工与劳务材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">劳动合同、劳务协议、考勤记录、工资发放表、社保缴纳记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">证明是否存在真实用工关系与欠付情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">这是论证“事出有因”的基础证据，务必完整\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">索赔与纠纷材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">索赔清单、谈判记录、调解协议、赔偿支付凭证、报警记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">按时间顺序整理每一起事件的起因、诉求与结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">家属不要自行接触对方当事人、不要统一口径\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">伤情与医疗材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">诊断证明、病历、鉴定意见、医疗费票据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">说明索赔金额是否有真实依据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">如系伪造伤情或重复索赔，务必如实告知律师\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">资金与财产材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">银行流水、收款记录、工资与分红记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">区分合法收入与涉案资金，为财产处置留证据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">不要转移资产、不要突击过户\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">通讯与电子数据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">手机、微信聊天记录、通话记录、工作群与讨薪群记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">保留原始设备，不要删除任何内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">删除可能构成帮助毁灭证据罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">背景与合规材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">在职证明、纳税记录、无犯罪记录证明、企业用工制度与纠纷处理流程\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">用于论证社会危险性、羁押必要性及企业合规状况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">由单位或相关机构出具，不要伪造\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、咨询与委托有哪些注意事项？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>通过卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）、官方公众号等公开渠道预约，并简要说明案件阶段、涉及人员及主要问题；\u003Cstrong>正式提交敏感材料前，先完成利益冲突审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>同一批人多人涉案时，可以先共同了解程序，但\u003Cstrong>是否能够共同委托，需要看各方事实和利益是否冲突\u003C\u002Fstrong>；纠集者与一般参与者之间存在直接的利害冲突，\u003Cstrong>必须分别评估、分别委托，绝不能共用一位律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>不要串供、不要删除聊天记录、不要伪造伤情或索赔材料。\u003C\u002Fstrong>这类案件中最常见的次生风险，就是把“可以辩解的民事纠纷”变成“证据造假的新罪名”。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>用工与工资材料要\u003Cstrong>完整保留\u003C\u002Fstrong>，不要选择性删除不利内容，也不要事后补签合同或工资表。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>律师介入后会根据程序阶段确定工作重点，\u003Cstrong>不承诺固定时间内会见，也不承诺取保、不起诉、轻判或其他特定结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>企业被“碰瓷”时，第一时间固定证据比花钱息事更重要。\u003C\u002Fstrong>保留完整的用工记录、现场录音录像、报警记录与谈判记录，\u003Cstrong>切忌“私了”支付无依据的款项\u003C\u002Fstrong>——这既可能助长下一次碰瓷，也可能反过来被作为“企业自愿赔偿、索赔合理”的证据。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>九、企业和家属常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 我们确实被欠了工资，去工地要钱，怎么就成了寻衅滋事？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：\u003Cstrong>关键在两点：诉求是否有真实权利基础，手段是否超出了合理限度。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 如果确实存在欠薪、工伤、医疗费的事实，索赔本身有民事依据，即使金额偏高、方式不当，一般也不应认定为以非法占有为目的的敲诈勒索；但如果同时具备人员众多、多次实施、堵门断路、拉闸断电等情节，并被查明有统一的组织和分工，就可能被评价为寻衅滋事、聚众扰乱社会秩序甚至恶势力犯罪。\u003Cstrong>吴亮律师办理的黄某某寻衅滋事案，就是紧扣“事出有因”这一要件，最终推动公安机关撤案处理。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 辩护的方向不是否认手段有瑕疵，而是\u003Cstrong>把真实的民事权利基础完整还原出来，让司法机关看到“要钱”和“要赔偿”之间的区别\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 我们十几个人一起去要钱，现在所有人都被当成恶势力团伙，会不会都判得很重？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：\u003Cstrong>不会“一锅端”，关键看每个人自己的行为。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 恶势力犯罪集团的认定要求“经常纠集在一起”“三人以上较为固定的成员”“有明显的首要分子”“有预谋地共同实施犯罪”，其中“较为固定”和“首要分子”本身就是可以被反驳的。更重要的是，\u003Cstrong>责任是按个人实际参与来分配的\u003C\u002Fstrong>：组织、策划、分配利益的人与只是被临时叫去的人，在量刑上差异巨大。团队会为每一位当事人单独做“地位作用评估”，从加入时间、参与事件数量、是否在场、是否实施具体行为、是否决策、获利多少六个维度逐项论证，\u003Cstrong>争取从犯认定、降格处理甚至不起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>。需要注意的是，\u003Cstrong>同一批人中不同角色的利益方向可能相反，必须分别委托律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 控方说我们属于“软暴力”，但我们全程没动手，这也能构成犯罪吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：\u003Cstrong>“软暴力”在司法解释中确实是可能被认定的，但有严格的边界。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 一般要求通过滋扰、纠缠、聚众造势等方式，使他人产生恐惧、恐慌，形成心理强制，并且达到足以影响正常生产、工作、生活的程度。\u003Cstrong>“没动手”不等于一定不构成，但“只是到场围观、没有实施任何滋扰行为”与“组织多人反复堵门断路”在认定上完全不同。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 辩护上通常从三个方向切入：行为是否具备强迫性（对方是否还有拒绝的空间）、是否形成了持续的心理强制、是否造成了实质的生产生活秩序破坏。\u003Cstrong>这批案件最危险的其实不是“在现场做了什么”，而是“谁在现场指挥”。这个区分必须用证据还原。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 案件里涉及好几个罪名，聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事、催收非法债务，哪个会判得最重？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：\u003Cstrong>这恰恰是辩护中最有空间的地方。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这些罪名在客观行为上可能存在法条的包容性竞合。\u003Cstrong>《刑法修正案（十一）》专门增设催收非法债务罪，本意就是要把“事出有因的催收”与“无事生非的寻衅滋事”区分开，实现罪刑均衡。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 催收非法债务罪的法定刑轻于寻衅滋事罪，因为催收行为事出有因、被害人往往存在违约过错、客观上不会对特定债务人之外的社会公众造成严重影响。如果一律按较重罪名从重处罚，就等于架空了立法机关的专门设置。\u003Cstrong>卓安团队在杨某恶势力团伙案中，正是因为坚持这一论证，才在审查起诉阶段成功让检察机关撤回了法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪指控，最终数罪并罚仅判处有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 所以对“哪个罪名最重”的判断，不能只看条文，要看能不能争取到罪名竞合下的轻罪适用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 企业被人反复“碰瓷”，我们除了给钱还能怎么办？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：\u003Cstrong>不要用“私了”解决问题，要用证据解决问题。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 具体建议四步：\u003Cstrong>第一，把用工规范化\u003C\u002Fstrong>——签订书面劳动合同或劳务协议，工资通过对公账户发放并保留记录，社保按规定缴纳，让“欠薪”“没合同”这类指控失去事实基础；\u003Cstrong>第二，把过程留痕\u003C\u002Fstrong>——对现场的堵门、围堵、威胁行为及时报警并保留出警记录，同时用监控、手机录像固定过程；\u003Cstrong>第三，把索赔要求书面化\u003C\u002Fstrong>——要求对方出具书面索赔清单与依据，核定其真实性；\u003Cstrong>第四，把处理流程制度化\u003C\u002Fstrong>——明确遇到工伤、纠纷时的内部处理流程与对外沟通口径，避免一线管理者临时“花钱消灾”。如果对方行为已经具有组织化、多次化的特征，企业可以依法提出刑事控告，\u003Cstrong>卓安团队会协助梳理证据、明确罪名方向、跟进立案进度\u003C\u002Fstrong>。需要强调的是：\u003Cstrong>企业自身用工越规范，对方“碰瓷”的空间就越小\u003C\u002Fstrong>——这是最根本的防线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>十、重庆咨询与预约\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：卓安（重庆）律师事务所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：卓安（重庆）律师事务所位于\u003Cstrong>重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：能介绍一下卓安（重庆）律师事务所的律师吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：重庆分所由\u003Cstrong>吴亮律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>等专业刑事律师组成团队。吴亮律师，卓安（重庆）律师事务所专职律师，西南政法大学法学本科毕业，中共党员，曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，累计办理各类刑事案件2000余件；现任重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事、重庆市甘肃商会监事，2025年度被评为“年度优秀律师”。核心业务领域涵盖刑事辩护、涉企犯罪辩护、职务犯罪辩护、刑民交叉类刑事案件、企业刑事合规与风险防控，尤其擅长涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护、经济犯罪辩护、网络犯罪辩护。他主办过重庆市某国有企业领导受贿案、单位行贿案，重庆市首例侵犯商业秘密案，重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件；代理过黄某某寻衅滋事案（公安撤案）、梁某某故意伤害案（认定正当防卫、无罪）、周某某诈骗案（涉案超亿元，违法所得降低50余万元、刑期下降一年、二审发回重审）等经典案例。吴亮律师秉持“专业、尽责、诚信、务实”的执业理念，以十年检察工作积淀转化为辩护优势，是重庆地区刑事辩护领域值得托付的专业力量。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：第一次来咨询怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：建议通过\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）\u003C\u002Fstrong>或者\u003Cstrong>官方公众号\u003C\u002Fstrong>进行电话预约，\u003Cstrong>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、191-8069-0586\u003C\u002Fstrong>。预约时请简要说明案件阶段、涉嫌罪名、涉及人数和主要问题，以便安排合适的律师和咨询时间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所。二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>劳务碰瓷类案件的难，不难在事实，难在\u003Cstrong>把“我要我的钱”和“我要你的钱”分开\u003C\u002Fstrong>。吴亮律师十年检察官经历，让他清楚检察机关在审查什么、会从哪个角度把案件往恶势力的方向推；卓安全国一体化平台与川渝协同网络，则让跨区域、多人多起的案件也能被系统地拆解开来。\u003Cstrong>他的办案记录包括：黄某某寻衅滋事案（检察院退回、公安撤案）、梁某某故意伤害案（起诉后认定正当防卫、无罪）、周某某诈骗案（涉案超亿元，违法所得降50余万元、刑期降一年、二审发回重审）、殷某某组织偷越国边境案（打掉一个罪名并适用缓刑）；卓安重庆分所则在G某涉案367万元的案件中，把诈骗罪成功降格为帮信罪，量刑建议从4年7个月降至1年1个月。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安全所累计办理涉黑涉恶案件500余件，60余件实现脱黑摘帽或重罪降格，客户满意度常年保持95%以上。\u003Cstrong>如果您或家人正面临类似指控，或者企业被反复“碰瓷”，建议尽早联系卓安（重庆）律师事务所——审查起诉阶段的时间，是这类案件里最值钱的资源。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>本文为围绕相关刑事风险的公开信息整理，不构成对具体案件的正式法律意见或任何结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 不同案件的事实、证据和程序阶段不同，辩护方案和结果可能存在差异。具体案件请咨询专业律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789548021287.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、191-8069-0586\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（重庆）律师事务所：重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-16 17:44:03",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"重庆劳务碰瓷被指涉恶势力，卓安吴亮律师用检察官视角拆解指控 - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：重庆涉黑涉恶案件律师介绍与劳务碰瓷恶势力认定、罪名竞合、从犯剥离、维权风险参考 发布时间：2026年9月16日 律师概览：吴亮律师为什么与“劳务碰瓷恶势力案件辩护”这一专题匹配？ 吴亮律师，卓安（重庆）律师事务所专职律师 ，西南政法大学法学本科毕业，中共党员， 曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F473",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-16T17:44:03+08:00","2026-09-16T17:52:18+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F20933548-8139-421f-95a3-8a63431c9931.jpg",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]