[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-452":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},452,"2026-09-15 18:04:31","我在手术台上让患者签字加项，为何被公安按涉恶敲诈定罪？ ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F15\u002F9846def7-3f85-4ccc-96c9-b28f3cfd69d9.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F15\u002Fefe937ab-8003-4f7c-97a7-39365c968268.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\ksohtml7952\\wps27.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">针对民营专科医院“术中加价”引发的涉恶敲诈勒索指控危机，依托卓安亲办黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案等实战经验，此类案件常因特定封闭场景下的心理强制被刑事穿透。化解风险的核心在于：一、阻断心理强制与敲诈勒索认定；二、剥离涉恶犯罪组织特征；三、厘清民事欺诈与刑事犯罪法定界限。面对常态化扫黑除恶高压，民营医疗机构该如何守住罪与非罪的合法红线？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【专业支持】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">本文由\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>成安律师（近30年刑事法律实务经验｜百人级刑事专业律师团队｜刑事风控与合规｜刑事危机应对与化解｜重大疑难刑事案件辩护）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">提供法律实务支持。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>成安律师简介：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>团队实战经验：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。“患者做包皮手术躺在手术台上，主刀医生说切开后发现坏死风险，让现场加做两万块的修复项目，患者签了知情同意书也转了账。这顶多是过度医疗或医疗消费欺诈，公安凭什么以‘涉黑涉恶敲诈勒索’把我们整个门诊部连锅端了？” 在常态化扫黑除恶斗争向医疗民生领域深度推进的大背景下，这是一位民营专科门诊部管理人员在突遭刑事立案后向律师发出的急切询问。这番质问极为精准地勾勒出部分民营医疗管理者在传统粗放经营下的认知盲区：误以为手握患者签字的知情同意书、通过医院合规转账，无论手术台上言语多么夸张、加价多么高昂，在法律上也仅属于过度医疗民事纠纷或消费欺诈行政违规。然而，他们严重误判了司法机关的实质判断标准：当手术刀划开身体、患者处于下身暴露与行动受限的封闭环境中时，以捏造病情施压已构成司法解释明确认定的“特定场景心理强制”，直接使商业欺诈演变为有组织的“软暴力”敲诈勒索及涉恶犯罪追责。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>一、身陷手术台创口暴露的封闭绝境，患者现场签字为何难掩敲诈勒索实质？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">部分民营男科、妇科专科门诊部在逐利驱动下，异化出一套精密的商业转化模式：前端以几十元超低价套餐网络引流；客服虚构前置方案诱导就诊；当患者被推进封闭手术室后，“术中攻单”正式展开。主刀医生在局麻切开创口后突然停刀，危言耸听声称“切开发现组织坏死，不立即加做两万元修复术将丧失生理功能”。此时患者下身麻醉、身体赤裸、创口流血，求助渠道被阻断。护士顺势递上加项同意书并推入POS机，患者在极度惊恐与求生本能驱使下被迫签字付款，医生方才继续缝合。在门诊部看来，签字付款代表双方自愿合意。然而在司法审判视野中，这种在极端不对称空间内施加的精神强制，正是涉恶敲诈勒索的典型形态。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】黄某涉嫌敲诈勒索罪一案（涉恶案件从严打击背景下依法获从轻处罚判处有期徒刑三年）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案情背景与指控风险：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">被告人曾某及其团伙成员黄某（原卷化名H某）与被害人程某投资设立某公司。后因分歧未实际经营，程某提出退股。曾某与黄某言语相威胁要求其将178万元投资款作为“赔偿”交出。同年秋季，曾某纠集黄某等人并邀约刑释人员在茶楼与程某“协商”，争执中黄某指使他人强抢程某车钥匙限制人身自由，迫使其出具大额借条后才得以脱身。公诉机关指控黄某等人具有涉恶势力犯罪情节构成敲诈勒索罪，面临极重刑罚追诉风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. 准确认定民事纠纷前置事实：调取合资协议与账目，证实纠纷根源系股东内部退股争议，具备民商事权利纠纷基础，并非凭空寻衅；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. 细致厘清从犯地位与次要作用：紧扣谈判笔录，证实黄某听从主犯指挥，在争执与出具借条环节起辅助配合作用，依法应当认定为从犯并从轻处罚；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">3. 推动积极退赔促成和解谅解：指导家属积极退赔全部差额损失，促成双方达成民事和解并取得书面刑事谅解书。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">法院采纳了卓安律师关于事出有因、具备民商事前置背景、黄某系从犯且积极退赔谅解的辩护意见，依法对黄某从轻判处有期徒刑三年。成安律师指出：“无论商业退股还是医疗诊疗，任何利用特定人身受限环境施加精神强制迫使他人交付财物的行为，都极易脱离民事轨道，被司法机关穿透定性为涉恶敲诈勒索犯罪。”黄某案的教训表明，形式签字无法掩盖精神强制的违法本质。在民营医疗场景中，涉恶立案一旦启动，“打财断血”措施接踵而至：不仅主刀医生与管理层被拘留逮捕，门诊部公户与股东资产均被冻结，核心医疗设备被查封扣押，整座机构数日内陷入停业瘫痪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>二、从术中突击加价到“打财断血”，诊疗创收何以引爆灾难性刑事倒查？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">许多民营专科医院之所以沦为涉恶专案，根源在于管理层对常态化扫黑除恶倒查机制缺乏清醒认知。《反有组织犯罪法》实施以来，政法机关建立了涉恶线索跨部门移送、提级管辖、异地用警与重点行业滚动排查机制。医疗卫生长期属于监管部门紧盯的重点领域，所谓的信息壁垒无法阻挡大数据研判。 当患者离院后向卫健或公安机关投诉，办案机关依托接处警平台与扫黑预警模型，迅速比对过往两年涉警数据。一旦发现频繁出现“手术做到一半被要求加钱”、“患者称遭恐吓”等警情，专案组便会启动穿透式初查。 侦查机关在初查阶段调证极其全面：调取HIS系统底层数据、电子病历修改痕迹、门诊流水与内部账册，调取手术室周边监控，并通过技术手段调取管理层与医生之间包含“攻单技巧”、“提成结算”的微信群聊记录。在客观证据链面前，过度医疗借口被彻底击穿。伴随涉恶案件特有的“打财断血”措施，专案组对涉案资产实行应查尽查，门诊流水被推定为违法所得冻结，投资人家属财产被全面审查，导致机构陷入生存绝境。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>三、对照刑法要件与软暴力司法解释，手术台上的病情施压何以触碰涉恶高压线？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">厘清术中加价与涉恶犯罪的界限，必须将医疗实务行为对照刑法条文及最新司法解释进行解构。公诉机关在此类案件中提起敲诈勒索罪乃至恶势力犯罪集团指控，其底层逻辑依托三重维度： 其一，《刑法》第二百七十四条敲诈勒索罪与“软暴力”司法解释的适用穿透。《刑法》第二百七十四条规定，敲诈勒索公私财物，数额较大或者多次敲诈勒索的，构成敲诈勒索罪。两高两部《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》明确，“软暴力”是指行为人为谋取不法利益，违法采用足以使他人产生恐惧、恐慌进而形成心理强制，或者足以影响、限制人身自由、危及人身财产安全的一系列手段。认定“特定场景心理强制”关键在于考察被害人当时的时空环境及其意志自由是否被实质性剥夺。患者躺在封闭手术台上，局部麻醉，敏感部位创口暴露流血，求助通道阻断。主刀医生虚构病情恶化，告知不加价将导致坏死残疾，属于恶害通告，足以使普通人陷入剧烈恐慌与心理强制，违背真实意愿交纳财物，完全符合敲诈勒索罪实行要件。 其二，主观“非法占有目的”的推定。涉案医院常抗辩称付出了医疗劳动，属于民事服务。但控方指控逻辑在于：医生明知患者无严重病变，故意夸大甚至凭空捏造病理危险，使用廉价耗材谎称高价修复，这种加价缺乏医学必要性与客观指征，本质属于借医疗之名行勒索之实，主观上被依法推定具有非法占有目的。 其三，恶势力组织特征与犯罪集团的比对。两高两部指导意见明确，恶势力是指经常纠集在一起，以暴力、威胁或者其他手段在一定区域或行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动，扰乱经济社会秩序但尚未形成黑社会性质组织的组织。涉案专科医院往往具备“幕后老板—运营副院长下达指标与话术—客服引流—医生台上逼签—财务转账分成”的固定链条，两年内对数十名患者反复实施加价敲诈，完全符合“经常纠集、为非作恶、欺压百姓”的恶势力集团法定要件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>四、误将知情同意书当成免责护身符，民营医疗实控人与医护人员陷入了哪些认知误区？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">剖析涉案民营医疗机构管理层及临床医生的心理防线，其滑向犯罪深渊的过程伴随着三种深层认知盲区： 盲区之一：误将形式上的“知情同意书”当成阻断刑事违法的万能防线。“患者自己看过告知并签字付款，属于双方自愿，怎么算敲诈？”这是最常见的辩解。这种辩解的错误在于将形式签名等同于实质真实意思表示。依据民法典规定，基于胁迫所实施的民事行为属于可撤销行为；而在刑法评价中，患者处于创口暴露、行动受限状态下所签文书属于丧失自由意志的妥协产物。用格式协议掩盖心理强制，反而被司法机关认定为早有预谋、规避监管的反侦查恶性。 盲区之二：误将“职务服从”与“创收考核”当成医护人员的避罪遮羞布。不少医生与护士辩称加价指标是院领导定的、话术是统一培训的，自己只是执行职务的打工者。但在共同犯罪与有组织犯罪法理中，职务隶属绝非免责事由。主刀医生是在手术台上直接实施恐吓、促成钱财交付的核心实行犯，极易被起诉认定为恶势力犯罪集团的重要积极参加者甚至骨干成员。 盲区之三：误将“医学专业壁垒”当成无法穿透的信息黑箱。部分管理者自恃办案人员不懂医学解剖，只要坚称存在坏死风险就无法推翻。然而办案机关调取原始病理切片、检验数据及手术影像，委托医学会专家组开展同行评议，依据循证医学标准能迅速判定加做项目是否具备医学指征。一旦鉴定认定“无病理指征、系故意捏造”，专业借口便会彻底瓦解。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>五、案发初期盲目找关系托人“平事”，为何反而导致危机全面失控？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">当调查风暴来临时，涉案医院管理层在恐慌之下极易采取错误举措，导致局面彻底失控。实务中必须高度警惕以下三种致命操作： 第一，突击销毁病历与篡改数据，衍生次生妨害司法犯罪。部分运营者指使信息科拔掉服务器网线、格式化硬盘，或命令医护人员连夜补写假病历。现代电子取证技术能够轻易提取底层数据库日志与磁盘残留，精准锁定修改时间。此举不仅无法脱罪，反而直接触犯《刑法》第三百零七条帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪，被认定为反侦查恶劣情节，彻底丧失认罪认罚从宽空间。 第二，轻信司法掮客，试图花钱托关系“平事”。专科医院老板多有资金积累，涉案后四处打探能摆平案件的人脉。这极易落入诈骗圈套。更严重的是，在常态化扫黑倒查监督下，私下请托记录会被纪检监察专案组锁定，作为深挖恶势力背后保护伞的线索并案彻查，引发涉腐职务调查与刑事立案双重危机。对此，卓安律师事务所始终坚守执业底线，坚决杜绝虚假承诺、司法勾兑，做有温度有底线的专业精品律所，依靠严密证据与扎实法理抗辩。 第三，恐慌性突击转移涉案资金，牵连无辜亲属。面对账户查封通知，部分股东将门诊款项通过亲友账户大额转移或虚假分红，极易触碰洗钱罪或掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪，导致未参与经营的亲属被卷入追诉旋涡。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>六、如何通过定性抗辩与证据链穿透，实现敲诈勒索出罪与涉恶标签剥离？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">面对民营专科医院涉恶敲诈勒索指控，依法开展专业辩护是关键出路。依托成安律师近三十年刑事辩护实战积淀，结合卓安独创的“控、辩、审、学”四维办案体系，辩护团队应当从底层证据链切入，把握三大防御支点： 第一，严格审查病理指征，阻断“非法占有目的”与敲诈勒索定性。辩护律师应深入案卷底层，调取门诊原始检验单、病理切片及手术记录，引入外部权威法医专家提供论证。若能证实患者切口处确实存在隐匿性病变或解剖异常，加项具备一定临床医学参考意义，即便存在收费过高或扩大宣传等行政违规，但只要具备真实诊疗基础，就能依法阻断“无病虚构”的非法占有故意，坚决阻断敲诈勒索罪的指控，将案件拉回过度医疗民事争议或轻微强迫交易处理。 第二，穿透式质证“特定场景心理强制”，推翻软暴力定性。细致比对患者笔录、麻醉记录与缴费时间线，审查加项沟通是否早在术前谈话室即已告知，患者当时意识状态是否清醒，医生沟通过程中是否存在停刀威胁与恶害言论。若证实医生未实施停刀胁迫且患者术后清醒状态下经确认完成补费，应当坚决主张不符合软暴力心理强制法定标准，依法剥离软暴力指控。 第三，精准击穿“组织特征”要件，全案剥离“恶势力”帽子。严格对照恶势力法定特征，审查医疗机构执业许可、员工劳动合同、社保纳税与日常规章制度，证明涉案机构系合法设立的医疗法人，员工按月领取合法薪酬，不存在实施违法犯罪的帮规戒律。术中加价属于考核机制异化下的偶发违规，缺乏为非作恶、欺压百姓的组织特征，坚决将全案从恶势力犯罪集团降格为普通自然人责任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等四罪案（成功阻断敲诈勒索非法占有目的，全案数罪并罚获从轻判决）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案情背景与指控风险：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">被告人董某受他人指使在土建施工行业开展业务。因认为分包工程亏损，董某等人多次电话威胁、殴打发包方经理，组织人员围堵工厂大门、拉闸断电致工厂停产一个月并打伤人员；后又因竞标败标威胁开发商股东强索50万元。公诉机关指控董某积极参加黑社会性质组织、犯敲诈勒索罪（数额巨大）、寻衅滋事罪、聚众扰乱社会秩序罪，指控其为涉黑骨干成员，面临十年以上乃至无期徒刑的极重追诉风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. 准确认定涉黑组织特征缺失：卓安团队全面阅卷，指出涉案人员关系松散，缺乏法定的帮规纪律与严密人身控制，收益归主犯支配，不具备黑社会性质组织法定组织与经济特征；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. 严格阻断非法占有目的：紧扣工程款纠纷事实，论证索款源于真实分包纠纷，目的具备民事基础，不能因现场断电堵门等过激手段直接推定具有非法占有故意，坚决阻断敲诈勒索指控；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">3. 细致厘清主从犯地位：严格比对人员名单与笔录，证实董某未参与部分打砸，在参与事件中听从指令起次要作用，依法应认定为从犯。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">法院采纳了卓安律师关于事出有因、缺乏非法占有故意及董某系从犯的辩护意见，依法对各项指控从轻处罚，数罪并罚最终决定执行有期徒刑十一年。成安律师指出：“在重大疑难刑事辩护中，击碎控方对主观‘非法占有目的’的片面推定是核心关键。依托底层真实事实与权利基础，将行为拉回民商事争议轨道，就能依法守住罪重与罪轻、涉恶与非恶的法定边界。”正是依托卓安三级品控体系与大案专家研判机制，使辩护意见具备严密的法理逻辑与事实支撑，帮助当事人依法实现涉恶指控的精准剥离与罪刑相适应。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>七、民营专科医院与门诊部管理者，如何依照全流程排查清单构筑刑事防火墙？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">对于民营专科医院投资人与管理者而言，最好的风控永远走在风险转化为刑事立案之前。民营医疗机构必须摒弃依靠术中信息差施压敛财的落后模式，主动建立刑事风险隔离墙。以下排查清单为机构筑牢法治底线提供了实务指引：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">风险排查维度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">高危红线行为（严禁触碰）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">涉恶\u002F刑事定性转化风险\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">合规隔离与风控处置策略\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">知情同意告知机制\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">麻醉或创口暴露状态下临时停刀、夸大病情施压强推加项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">被认定特定封闭场景软暴力心理强制，构成敲诈勒索罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">严格执行术前告知双轨制，严禁术中增加非紧急自费项目；加项须清醒状态双签字确认\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">绩效考核与提成设计\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">下达术中加价创收指标、设立梯级加项提成、培训恐吓话术\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">被控方认定具备非法占有目的，按恶势力犯罪集团全员追责\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">取缔术中加价提成指标，薪酬挂钩医疗质量与患者满意度，设立合规考核一票否决制\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">病历与数据合规管理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">突击篡改电子病历、拔掉HIS服务器、伪造虚假诊疗记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">构成帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪，被认定反侦查情节，丧失从宽契机\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">健全不可逆审计留痕系统，定期开展第三方合规审计，严禁人工违规篡改或删除历史记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">医患纠纷现场化解\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">患者质疑收费时组织保安扣押证件手机、强行阻拦离院\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">触犯非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪，与术中加价并案认定为恶势力\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">设立独立合规调解部门，畅通调解渠道；遇争议主动封存病历并报请卫健委与医调委介入\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">突发刑事危机应对\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">私下打探案情、轻信司法掮客花钱“平事”、恐慌性转移资产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"162\">引发诈骗风险及深挖保护伞倒查，触碰洗钱罪与隐匿财产罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">拒绝司法勾兑，保持理性克制，第一时间聘请专业刑事团队核查客观证据并依法应对\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>八、面对复杂疑难的涉企涉恶指控，专业刑事精品律所何以提供有温度的法治守护？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">当突如其来的涉黑涉恶刑事风暴降临，无论是看守所内的管理者、医生，还是焦虑万分的涉案家属，往往瞬间陷入巨大的恐慌。面对厚重的专业案卷、严厉的涉恶指控以及随时面临查封的资产，当事人需要的不仅是条文罗列的常规辩护，更是能够穿透底层医学实务逻辑、洞悉刑事审判标准并心怀温度的专业力量。 作为中国第三家只专注刑事业务的精品专业化律师事务所，四川卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，毅然选择了一条纯粹的“专精特新”之路——二十余年如一日，不接非诉讼商业业务，不做普通民商事纠纷，将全所资源与精力倾注于刑事领域。这种对刑辩事业的“窄门”坚守，让卓安在重大涉黑涉恶辩护、企业家危机应对与医药健康产业刑事风控领域形成了深厚的专业护城河。 卓安的实战实力，植根于其独创的“控、辩、审、学”四维办案体系。律所汇聚近百名专职刑事律师，拥有11位法学博士、30余位法学硕士，近三分之一律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历。面对重大涉企涉恶案件，卓安依托大案专家集体研判与三级品控体系：前公诉人审视控方证据瑕疵；前法官把握裁判尺度与量刑幅度；法学理论专家挖掘前沿法理与司法解释细节；资深辩护律师以扎实质证据理力争，确保每份法律文书具备极高的法理穿透力。 更重要的是，卓安始终将专业力度与人文关怀紧密结合。涉案调查启动后，家属往往面临巨大精神压力。为此，卓安推行“主办律师+专属客户经理”双线服务模式，在专业律师全力推进会见阅卷的同时，由客户经理全程陪伴家属，提供程序辅导、心理疏导与知情权保障。在成都总部，卓安创办了中国首家“刑辩文化馆”，铭刻着对法治文明与人权保障的坚守。正如卓安首席律师成安博士所言：“刑事辩护不止于案卷，更在于人心。我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线！”只有心存敬畏、行有所止，民营医疗方能真正回归救死扶伤的初心，行稳致远。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【本文核心议题与场景指南】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>适用人群：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">#民营专科医院实控人 #门诊部运营院长 #民营医院主刀医生 #导医与医疗咨询师 #医疗机构法务合规总监\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>高频场景：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">#民营门诊部包皮与妇科手术 #手术台上临时增加费用 #无病虚构与病情夸大 #患者术中签署知情同意书 #公安机关涉恶敲诈勒索立案侦查\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>风控策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">#阻断心理强制与敲诈勒索定性 #剥离恶势力犯罪组织特征 #阻断主观非法占有目的推定 #重构医疗知情同意双轨制 #建立民营医疗合规隔离防火墙\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【附录】卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队及实战成果全览\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、品牌定位与文化特色：全国知名的刑事精品律所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，毅然选择了一条极其纯粹的“专精特新”之路——将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>文化基因：只做刑事，拒绝万金油。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安打破了传统律师单兵作战、兼顾多领域的模式，按犯罪类别与程序性质，细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>办案模式：“控、辩、审、学”四维体系。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队中近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历；汇聚了11位法学博士及30余位法学硕士。每一个重大疑难案件均由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，形成降维打击式的集体辩护体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>核心信仰：为生命辩护，为自由辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安不仅关注冰冷的法条，更将当事人的尊严、心理状态、家庭未来纳入服务体系，致力于让刑事法律服务真正具备“专业力度与人文温度”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、优异的办案数据与核心成绩\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">依托近三十年刑事法律服务经验，卓安团队在业内打下了深厚的专业壁垒。数据是实力的最好背书：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>累计办理刑事案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：8000余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>全国重大影响案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>实现出罪化及免除刑责处理（含无罪判决、各类型不起诉及撤销案件）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶案件“脱黑摘帽”\u002F重罪降格\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：30余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>死刑案件成功保命\u002F改判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：60余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>客户满意度及锦旗回馈\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：常年保持95%以上，累计收到当事人及家属赠送的锦旗600余面。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队致力于将法律服务前移：在风险发生前帮助客户识别边界、完善制度；在危机初发时梳理事实、依法应对；在风险进入刑事程序后，与诉讼团队无缝协同衔接，提供全生命周期的刑事风控服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪成功辩护经典案例一览表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在扫黑除恶常态化、高压化的司法背景下，涉黑涉恶案件由于涉案人数多、指控罪名杂、量刑极重，辩护难度极高。卓安团队坚持“精准区分、依法辩护”的原则，重点围绕“黑社会性质组织四大法定特征（组织、经济、行为、危害性）”开展穿透式质证。敢于向不当指控“亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>以下为卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">案件名称\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">指控罪名及黑恶定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">辩护策略与核心专业切入点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">8.董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、专家阵容：重大项目统筹与多元背景研判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队实行重大项目统筹把关与多元专业背景协同研判，汇聚了多位在刑事风控与合规领域具有卓越实战经验的资深专家：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>成安律师（团队领衔）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。\u003Cbr>打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003Cbr>专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003Cbr>深度聚焦食药环（食品药品、生态环境）、工程建筑、金融证券、教育等重点产业，并在涉税犯罪防治、知识产权刑事保护、数据合规、反商业贿赂等前沿交叉领域开展专项研究。擅长穿透各行业底层商业模式，依托真实业务场景，精准识别并阻断固有的刑事法律风险，提供贴合产业实际的定制化刑事合规服务方案。\u003Cbr>累计为百余家上市企业提供深度刑事风控审查与法律顾问服务；妥善办理300余起政商高管刑事危机应对案例，担任500余位企业家私人刑事合规顾问，开展800余场企业风控内训，主导办理1000余起重大疑难刑事案件，持续输出具备行业穿透力的实务风险处置方案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>何冰冰律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所主任。原市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长。从事法律工作十几年，参与办理各类刑事案件1000余件，重点负责公职人员履职风险和重大危机应对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>艾述洪律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所执行主任、成都市律师协会刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。近二十年来专注刑事辩护与合规审查，在重大涉黑恶案件（如G某涉黑案等）中多次成功运用程序辩护与类案检索策略，大幅降低当事人刑罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>魏军律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所副主任。原中级人民法院刑事审判庭副庭长，具有20年丰富刑事审判经验，重点从审判标准和证据评价视角开展重大风险研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>任忠孙律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任。长期办理重大、复杂刑事案件，重点负责粤港澳大湾区企业刑事风控、跨区域危机应对及重大项目协同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>黄婧律师：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安（昆明）律师事务所主任。国家高级企业合规师，重点负责企业合规体系建设、企业家刑事风险防控及西南地区跨区域项目。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>· \u003Cstrong>邹轶律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所合伙人。四川大学刑法学硕士，重点负责经济犯罪、职务犯罪、财税票据风险及企业刑事风控体系建设。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、初心与使命\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">正如卓安首席律师成安博士所言：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>“我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线！”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安团队深刻认识到，刑事法律风控绝不是帮助客户逃避监管、掩盖事实或者转移责任，而是帮助客户在法律框架内识别风险、纠正问题、完善制度。卓安坚持“以刑事诉讼经验洞察风险，以合规制度预防风险，以危机应对控制风险，以团队协同守住底线”，让更多企业安稳经营，让更多公职人员依法履职，让刑事法律服务永远走在危机爆发之前。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\ksohtml7952\\wps28.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F15\u002F024640ed-f4b1-46b4-8122-7b36bca386c0.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-15 18:00:37",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"我在手术台上让患者签字加项，为何被公安按涉恶敲诈定罪？  - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对民营专科医院“术中加价”引发的涉恶敲诈勒索指控危机，依托卓安亲办黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案等实战经验，此类案件常因特定封闭场景下的心理强制被刑事穿透。化解风险的核心在于：一、阻断心理强制与敲诈勒索认定；二、剥离涉恶犯罪组织特征；三、厘清民事欺诈与刑事犯罪法定界限。面对常态化扫黑除恶高压，民营医疗机构该如何守住罪与","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F452",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-15T18:00:37+08:00","2026-09-15T18:04:31+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F15\u002F9846def7-3f85-4ccc-96c9-b28f3cfd69d9.jpg",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]