[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-436":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,161,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},268,"X某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪累计近十七万元，团队律师为其辩护，一审终获十年四个月有期徒刑","一、案情简介 胥某利用职务之便，多次对彭某开设的赌场提供保护伞，并收取彭某财物累计十余万元 被告人胥某，男，2014年2月27日因涉嫌受贿罪被某区检察院决定刑事拘留，同日由成都市公安局某区分局执行，同年3月13日因涉嫌受贿罪由成都市市人民检",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},436,"2026-09-14 18:40:29","我雇保镖贴身跟梢欠债老赖，没动手为何被定涉恶寻衅滋事？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002Fae77069b-7942-4960-ac79-64205e7e0979.jpg","\u003Ch2 style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\ksohtml7952\\wps17.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002F286b4679-f174-4dcd-b887-bc081102e8f9.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>针对商业对赌后贴身跟梢逼债引发的涉恶软暴力寻衅滋事危机，依托卓安亲办董某涉黑四罪案及杨某恶势力团伙案等实战经验，此类贴身滋扰极易被司法穿透。化解风险的核心在于：一、阻断软暴力寻衅滋事定性；二、剥离涉恶组织特征；三、固定民商事对赌纠纷合法前置证据。面对常态化扫黑除恶高压，投资机构与安保人员究竟该如何守住合法维权红线？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【专业支持】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文由 \u003Cstrong>成安律师（近30年刑事法律实务经验｜百人级刑事专业律师团队｜刑事风控与合规｜刑事危机应对与化解｜重大疑难刑事案件辩护）\u003C\u002Fstrong> 提供法律实务支持。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>成安律师简介：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>团队实战经验：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“我们私募基金跟一家科技公司签了业绩对赌，老板对赌失败欠我们八千万不还，还把资产往老婆名下转。为了拿回投资人的钱，我雇了第三方安保公司，派了八个黑西装保镖二十四小时贴身跟着他，陪他上班、接送孩子，在他家门口蹲守，但绝不动手打人。我们是在保护合法债权，怎么公安以‘涉恶软暴力寻衅滋事’把我和安保公司全抓了？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在股权投资市场面临退出严冬与不良资产清收压力剧增的背景下，这是一位私募基金投资负责人在突遭公安机关刑事拘留后，托家属向专业刑事律师发出的焦灼困惑。这番看似占理的自辩，极其典型地折射出一级市场金融机构与资产处置从业者在法律认知上的深层盲区：误以为手握合法的对赌协议与业绩补偿承诺，就享有超越法律界限的私力救济特权；误以为被投企业实控人存在转移财产、恶意逃废债的失信过错，投资方的施压手段便天然具备了合法性；更致命的是，盲目迷信民间所谓“只要不动拳头、不打伤人、不关进黑屋就不算犯罪”的陈旧观念，以为雇佣第三方安保人员开展“文明贴身护送”属于合法边界内的灰色技巧。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>然而，刑事司法的穿透力从来不会被形式上的民商事债权所遮蔽。在2026年常态化扫黑除恶与打击涉企软暴力犯罪的高压态势下，司法机关对于有组织侵犯公民人身安宁与社会管理秩序的行为始终保持严惩态势。当二十四小时贴身跟梢、封堵家门、尾随未成年子女成为常规维权武器时，合法投资债权的幌子瞬间被撕碎，直接演变为有组织涉恶软暴力寻衅滋事犯罪的严厉追责。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>一、手握八千万合法对赌债权且未动一拳一脚，为何雇人贴身跟梢逼债会被立案为涉恶寻衅滋事？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>在商业投资实践中，高新科技企业因市场剧变未能达成业绩指标或上市承诺，导致对赌协议失败的情形极为普遍。面对数千万元甚至上亿元的股权回购债务，部分创始人利用诉讼与执行的审理周期，通过假离婚析产、股权代持或虚构对外借款大肆转移核心财产。面对出资人（LP）的清算压力，部分基金管理者失去理性，放弃漫长的民商事诉讼通道，转向雇佣持有保安资质的第三方安保公司或商务调查机构实施极端私力救济。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>安保机构统一指派黑西装保镖开展全天候轮班跟梢：清晨守候在居民单元门前，白天与目标并肩挤入电梯、列席商务会议室旁听，甚至如影随形尾随其未成年子女上下学；入夜则在房门外聚集。他们自以为全程开着执法记录仪拍摄取证、不推搡殴打便能筑起安全防火墙，却实质性地将对方家庭置于持续窒息的精神恐慌之中。当被害人多次报警后，公安机关迅速以涉嫌“涉恶软暴力寻衅滋事罪”对出资方与安保人员立案侦查并全链条抓捕。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等四罪案（从重指控中依法剥离骨干成员与定性降格，数罪并罚获从轻判决）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案情背景与指控风险：被告人董某卷入以杜某为首的涉黑专案。因工程分包施工亏本，杜某、董某等人向发包方索要工程欠款，多次组织大量人员围堵工厂大门、拉闸断电，致使工厂停产达一个月。公诉机关指控董某系涉黑组织骨干成员，构成参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪、聚众扰乱社会秩序罪与寻衅滋事罪，面临数罪并罚被判处十五年以上重刑的巨大风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1. 深入穿透资金流水与经济独立性：卓安团队依托“控辩审学”一体化研判机制，全面审查账目明细，证实董某收益均源于独立劳务施工，未享受涉黑组织非法利润分配，资金流转严格独立；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2. 精准拆解组织特征与层级依附：详细比对涉黑涉恶司法解释，论证董某未参与组织纪律制定，未接受人身控制与层级指派，坚决阻击公诉机关关于“骨干成员”的指控定位；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3. 事实穿透与主观非法占有阻断：针对敲诈勒索与寻衅滋事指控，从底层工程合同切入，证实案涉催收源于真实工程欠款，主观上缺乏非法占有他人财物故意，阻断了敲诈勒索罪核心要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果：法院充分采纳卓安团队关于董某不属于涉黑骨干成员、案涉纠纷具备民商事基础的辩护意见，依法对董某在涉黑组织中的地位予以从轻认定，各罪均大幅从轻处罚，数罪并罚最终决定执行有期徒刑十一年。成安律师指出：“无论商业对赌还是工程清欠，任何以保障债权为由采取聚众围堵、蹲守滋扰等强制手段的行为，在客观上都极易被评价为扰乱公共秩序的涉黑涉恶犯罪。董某案警示所有债权人：目的合法绝不等于手段免责，一旦滑入非法私力救济，维权者便会反噬自身。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>董某案的教训极为沉重：涉恶立案一旦启动，“打财断血”强制措施随之而来。私募基金的对公账户、投资项目资产面临全面冻结，引发其他投资人恐慌挤兑，安保公司收取的催收佣金亦被定性为涉案非法所得予以全额追缴。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>二、从雇佣黑西装保镖到全链条抓捕，办案机关何以依托现代侦查手段击碎“商务安保”掩护？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>许多涉案高管在身陷囹圄时十分不解：双方签署了商务随卫协议，现场既未发生身体冲突也未毁坏公私财物，办案机关何以能够在极短时间内形成闭环锁链实施收网？这种侥幸，源于对常态化扫黑除恶机制下数字化穿透侦查手段的无知。自《反有组织犯罪法》施行以来，公安机关构建了全方位的智能数字侦控体系：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，天网监控与时空轨迹的大数据精准碰撞。针对被害人多次报警引发的警情预警，警方调取当事人住宅小区、办公写字楼与学校周边的全天候高清监控，利用大数据算法交叉比对8名安保人员与债务人一家的出行轨迹。监控清晰还原出“24小时贴身尾随、电梯并肩出入、校门驻足盯防”的时空重叠图谱，彻底击碎了“偶然偶遇、公共场所自由活动”的辩解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，移动终端取证击穿“商务服务”虚伪外衣。专案组扣押涉案人员智能手机后，通过专业电子取证系统恢复了被删除的微信群聊。群内“轮流盯死、别让他谈业务、接孩子时拍照施压、不还钱别让他合眼”等直白指令，直接坐实了出资方与安保团队主观上追求摧毁对方心理防线、实施精神强制的逼债意图。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，穿透式资金流审计查清组织利益纽带。经侦与刑侦联合审计发现，私募基金管理账户向安保公司支付巨额服务费，并白纸黑字约定“按回款总额10%至15%提取成功奖励”，安保公司据此向一线保镖发放高额出勤补贴。高额的风险溢价与回款直接挂钩的事实，直接锁定了有组织违法犯罪的经济驱动力，所谓合规安保合同的掩护顷刻瓦解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>三、对照刑法要件与软暴力司法解释，贴身纠缠逼债何以跨过民事边界触碰涉恶犯罪高压线？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>解构商业对赌逼债案件的刑事定性，必须对照《刑法》规范体系与涉黑涉恶司法解释展开精准剖析：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，《刑法》第二百九十三条第一款第（二）项寻衅滋事罪要件。《刑法》规定，追逐、拦截、辱骂、恐吓他人，情节恶劣的，构成寻衅滋事罪。两高两部《关于办理实施“软暴力”刑事案件若干问题的意见》明确界定：为索取合法债务或因民间纠纷，采用贴身跟随、滋扰恐吓等“软暴力”手段，严重影响他人正常工作、生活秩序，符合刑法第二百九十三条规定的，应当以寻衅滋事罪定罪处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，侵害生活安宁权与未成年人保护的情节判定。司法解释将“贴身跟随、滋扰、哄闹、聚众造势”明确定性为软暴力。在本案中，涉案人员侵入私人生活公区与住宅门前，更将滋扰延伸至未成年子女学校，严重践踏公民居住安宁权，对未成年人身心健康造成重大威胁，属于司法解释明文规定的严重恶劣情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，法定罪名辨析：为何不定“催收非法债务罪”？《刑法修正案（十一）》增设的第二百九十三条之一“催收非法债务罪”，法定最高刑仅为三年，但其前提是催收“高利放贷等产生的非法债务”。对赌回购属于合法民商事债权，因而不构成本罪；正因缺乏前置非法债务属性，债权人采取严重软暴力手段时，司法机关只能直接适用法定刑更重的《刑法》第二百九十三条寻衅滋事罪追究刑责。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其四，恶势力组织特征与共同犯罪归责。根据司法解释，三人以上经常纠集在一起，在特定行业或领域内多次以软暴力手段扰乱秩序的，构成恶势力。安保公司长期接单、基金管理人员多次指令，极易被认定为恶势力团伙。在共同犯罪架构下，出资指使的基金负责人被列为主犯，安保负责人与执行保镖被列为积极参加者，全链条追究刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>四、自恃“不出拳见血”即属合法维权，私募基金与安保公司陷入了哪些致命认知盲区？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>剖析涉案人员的心理演变，其之所以滑向涉恶深渊，根源在于三重认知错位：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>盲区之一：误将“合法债权与对方老赖逃债”当作对抗刑法的免罚护身符。高管常抱有道德优越感：“对方恶意隐匿资产，我们合法清欠何罪之有？”现代法治社会严格禁止私力救济践踏他人基本人权。即使债务真实合法，债权人也必须通过民商事诉讼、财产保全以及申请追究“拒不执行判决、裁定罪”等公权力渠道维权。任何以侵害人身安宁为代价的私刑逼债，均越过了刑法红线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>盲区之二：误将“非接触式无伤施压”当作规避惩处的安全岛。部分人员盲目信奉“只要不动手打人就没事”。软暴力立法的核心目的，正是打击“虽未动用物理刀枪，但通过精神折磨与心理强制达到同等危害后果”的违法行为。二十四小时黑衣人贴身跟随形成的精神窒息感，对当事人心理防线的摧毁程度不亚于物理暴力。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>盲区之三：误将“商业安保合同与从属打工”当作切割责任的防火墙。基金以为“外包给第三方，出事与我无关”；保镖以为“拿工资听指挥，不应定罪”。刑法严格遵循实质审查与主客观相统一原则。委托合同的合法外衣无法阻断共同犯罪故意；而一线保镖明知逼债性质仍积极参与贴身看守，直接构成了实行行为，依法必须承担共同犯罪责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>五、面对公安专案组立案侦查，盲目销毁安保合同与私下找关系“平事”为何导致危机恶化？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>在警方突击调查时，当事人极易因惊慌失措而采取一系列反噬自身的极端操作，导致危机全面恶化：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，连夜销毁安保合同、格式化硬盘与删除群聊，引发妨害司法重罪。许多涉案人员突击销毁协议、退群并订立攻守同盟。现代电子取证技术能够轻易恢复历史痕迹。此类掩盖行为不仅无法脱罪，反而直接触犯《刑法》第三百零七条帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪，被认定为具有强烈反侦查意识与深层组织恶性，彻底丧失取保候审与从宽处理的法定机会。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，轻信司法掮客，企图花巨款找关系“平事捞人”。部分高管急于托人走动，支付数百万元公关打点费。在常态化扫黑除恶“打伞破网”高压态势下，此类行径不仅极易遭遇诈骗，更会导致请托线索被纪检监察专案组并案倒查，升级为涉黑恶与行贿罪并发的重大职务大案。对此，四川卓安律师事务所始终坚守执业伦理，坚决杜绝虚假承诺、司法勾兑，做有温度有底线的专业精品律所，依靠严密证据与扎实法理展开防御。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，仓促通过个人关联账户分散转移基金资产。当事人仓促将公户资金或催收佣金转入配偶、亲友账户，导致无辜亲属因涉嫌《刑法》第三百一十二条掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得罪被同步采取刑事强制措施，造成全家资产被全面冻结查扣。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>六、如何通过民商事纠纷前置穿透与组织特征拆解，依法实现软暴力脱恶与定性降格？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>面对涉恶软暴力寻衅滋事指控，精准的法律抗辩是化解危机的正当出路。依托成安律师近三十年刑事辩护经验与卓安独创的“控、辩、审、学”四维办案体系，辩护团队应当把握三大抗辩支点：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，穿透固定商业投资基础关系，彻底阻断主观流氓滋事动机。寻衅滋事罪通常要求具备称霸一方、寻求精神刺激的流氓动机。卓安律师团队在此类案件中，首先提取并固化对赌投资协议、财务审计报告与催告函，证实案件起因系真实商业投资对赌违约纠纷，主观意图系挽回出资人合法财产，坚决将其与社会流氓无事生非相剥离，力争在起诉阶段降格处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，精细化质证软暴力行为程度，阻断“情节恶劣”入罪门槛。逐秒核实公共视频，查明安保人员是否保持合理间距、是否实际中断企业正常经营秩序，结合被害人案发期间能够正常从事商业活动的客观事实，论证未达到“严重扰乱正常工作生活秩序”的入罪界限，依法争取不作为犯罪处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，对照恶势力法定要件，依法拆解组织特征与行业危害性。重点论证出资方与安保机构系偶发性商务委托，缺乏长期稳定的犯罪组织架构与帮规纪律，未在金融或安保行业形成非法控制，依法不符合恶势力的法定构成要件，坚决推动全案脱恶摘帽。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】杨某涉嫌恶势力团伙非法拘禁、催收非法债务案（数罪并罚依法获轻判，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案情背景与指控风险：被告人杨某纠集多名社会人员，长期从事民间借贷与债务催收。为迫使债务人还款，杨某指使成员将多名人员带至郊区农家乐与宾馆集中看管，没收手机证件，限制自由达数十小时，并伴随言语威胁。公诉机关指控杨某构成寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等多项重罪，认定为恶势力团伙纠集者与主犯，面临十年以上重刑追诉风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1. 审查起诉阶段精准阻击最重罪名：依托“控辩审学”一体化研判，卓安团队细致审查视听证据，证实冲突源于真实民间债务，现场并未形成流氓性械斗准备，促使检察院对法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪作出不起诉决定；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2. 引入前沿刑法修正案准确定性：紧扣《刑法修正案（十一）》催收非法债务罪，论证杨某行为与非法拘禁罪的法条竞合与定性转化，反对将民商事维权过激行为一律拔高为恶势力重罪；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3. 精准拆解恶势力组织与危害性特征：紧扣司法解释，证实人员缺乏严密规约，收益未形成组织公积金，行为仅针对特定债务人，未扰乱公共行业秩序。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果：法院采纳卓安关于事出有因、聚众斗殴不成立的辩护意见，检方未起诉聚众斗殴罪，法院依法从轻判决，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。成安律师指出：“无论民间借贷还是对赌清收，过激施压都极易跨过法律红线。但专业辩护的价值，正是通过层层穿透底层事实，坚决阻击不当拔高归罪，将责任依法限定在合理法定区间。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>杨某案的成功办理，体现了卓安大案专家研判会与三级品控体系在化解重大刑事危机中的关键力量。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>七、私募基金投资撤退与不良债权处置，如何依照排查清单构筑全流程刑事合规防火墙？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>对于私募基金与资产处置机构而言，最严密的资产风控永远走在刑事立案之前。面对违约逃废债，必须摒弃灰色催收惯性，建立制度化的合规防火墙。以下由卓安团队提炼的风控排查清单，为机构守牢法律底线提供了实务指引：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">风险排查维度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">高危红线行为（严禁触碰）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">涉恶\u002F刑事定性转化风险\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">合规隔离与风控处置策略\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">债权催收与人员派遣管控\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">指派人员24小时贴身跟随、在住宅门口与办公区蹲守滋扰\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">触犯《刑法》第293条软暴力寻衅滋事罪，构成涉恶团伙犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">严禁任何形式的贴身跟随与生活场所蹲守，仅限工作时间正规商务拜访\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">第三方机构聘用与合同审查\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">聘请无资质催收团伙，签署空白合同或按回款约定高额提成\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">构成涉恶犯罪组织共犯，服务费直接被定性为涉案非法所得追缴\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">严选持牌合规安保机构，合同明文禁止限制自由与滋扰，实行合规审计\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">目标人及其家属活动边界\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">尾随跟踪未成年子女上下学，向老人施压，在学校和医院造势\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">司法解释明确认定为加重恶劣情节，直接排除从轻量刑并批捕\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">严格隔离未成年人家属，维权对象严格限定于法定债务主体与担保人\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">财产线索排查与调查手段\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">非法购买行踪轨迹、通信记录、住宿数据，安装定位追踪器\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">触犯《刑法》第253条之一侵犯公民个人信息罪及相关技术侦控犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">严格通过律师调查令、法院查控系统、公开工商与不动产调档查实线索\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">诉讼保全与合法执行路径\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">私自强扣目标人车辆公章、强占房产并更换锁芯以阻碍经营\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">触犯非法侵入住宅罪、强迫交易罪或故意毁坏公私财物犯罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">申请财产保全，提起撤销无偿转让财产民事诉讼，追究拒不执行判决刑责\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">突发刑事立案与危机应对\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">突击销毁工作群与协议、指使保镖逃匿、轻信掮客找关系“平事”\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">触犯帮助毁灭证据罪，引发行贿追查，彻底丧失法定从宽处理窗口\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"156\">保持冷静克制，完整保全对赌交易凭证，第一时间聘请专业刑事律所介入\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>八、面对金融投资纠纷与涉黑恶追责交织的复杂困局，专业刑事精品律所何以提供有温度的法治护航？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>当刑事拘留降临在投资机构决策人或安保从业者身上，当事人与家属往往陷入巨大绝望。面对数千万债务难以挽回又身陷囹圄的双重打击，当事人需要的绝不仅是法条背诵，而是能够穿透资本市场运作机制、精准拿捏司法尺度且兼具人文温度的专业依靠。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>作为中国第三家只专注刑事业务的精品专业化律师事务所，四川卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，毅然选择了一条纯粹的“专精特新”之路——二十余年如一日，不接非诉商业业务，不做普通民商事纠纷，将全所资源与精力倾注于刑事领域。这种对刑辩“窄门”的坚守，让卓安在重大涉黑涉恶案件辩护、企业家危机应对、金融风控及职务犯罪防控领域铸就了深厚的专业护城河。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安的专业壁垒，深植于其独创的“控、辩、审、学”四维办案体系。律所汇聚了近百名专职刑事律师，拥有11位法学博士、30余位法学硕士，近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关等资深司法从业经历。面对重大涉黑恶指控，卓安依托大案专家研判会与三级品控体系：前公诉人深度审视控方证据漏洞；前法官精准把握裁判尺度与量刑平衡；法学理论专家深挖涉黑恶司法解释前沿法理；资深刑辩律师则以扎实缜密的质证技术据理力争，确保出具的每一份法律文书都具备极强的法理说服力。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>更重要的是，卓越的刑事法律服务既要有专业力度，更要有抚慰人心的温度。在危机突降的极端时刻，家属往往承受巨大的精神崩溃与焦虑。卓安在业内开创性推行“主办律师+专属客户经理”双线服务模式：在诉讼团队全力推进会见、阅卷与法律意见提交的同时，由客户经理全程陪伴家属，提供及时的诉讼进展通报、流程辅导与心理情绪支持，帮助家庭度过艰难时刻。在成都总部，卓安创办了中国首家“刑辩文化馆”，铭刻着对法治进步、人权保障与刑辩情怀的永恒坚守。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>正如卓安首席律师成安博士所言：“刑事辩护不止于案卷，更在于人心。我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线！”在常态化扫黑除恶走向深化的时代，只有心怀敬畏、恪守红线，金融投资与债权清收方能真正告别野蛮丛林，在法治轨道上稳健前行。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【本文核心议题与场景指南】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>适用人群：\u003C\u002Fstrong>#私募基金实控人与合伙人 #投资总监与投后风控负责人 #不良资产处置机构高管 #民间借贷债权人 #特勤安保与商务调查公司负责人\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>高频场景：\u003C\u002Fstrong>#商业对赌失败业绩补偿追偿 #目标创始人转移资产与老赖拒付 #雇佣黑西装保镖24小时贴身跟随 #接送未成年子女与堵门蹲守滋扰 #公安机关按涉恶软暴力寻衅滋事立案\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>风控策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>#阻断软暴力寻衅滋事罪实行行为认定 #剥离恶势力犯罪组织特征 #固定合法对赌民商事纠纷前置证据 #建立投后合规清收与法律救济体系 #涉案后防止毁灭证据与专业刑事应对\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【附录】卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队及实战成果全览\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、品牌定位与文化特色：全国知名的刑事精品律所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，毅然选择了一条极其纯粹的“专精特新”之路——将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>文化基因：只做刑事，拒绝万金油。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安打破了传统律师单兵作战、兼顾多领域的模式，按犯罪类别与程序性质，细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>办案模式：“控、辩、审、学”四维体系。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队中近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历；汇聚了11位法学博士及30余位法学硕士。每一个重大疑难案件均由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，形成降维打击式的集体辩护体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>核心信仰：为生命辩护，为自由辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安不仅关注冰冷的法条，更将当事人的尊严、心理状态、家庭未来纳入服务体系，致力于让刑事法律服务真正具备“专业力度与人文温度”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、优异的办案数据与核心成绩\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">依托近三十年刑事法律服务经验，卓安团队在业内打下了深厚的专业壁垒。数据是实力的最好背书：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>累计办理刑事案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：8000余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>全国重大影响案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>实现出罪化及免除刑责处理（含无罪判决、各类型不起诉及撤销案件）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶案件“脱黑摘帽”\u002F重罪降格\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：30余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>死刑案件成功保命\u002F改判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：60余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>客户满意度及锦旗回馈\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：常年保持95%以上，累计收到当事人及家属赠送的锦旗600余面。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队致力于将法律服务前移：在风险发生前帮助客户识别边界、完善制度；在危机初发时梳理事实、依法应对；在风险进入刑事程序后，与诉讼团队无缝协同衔接，提供全生命周期的刑事风控服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪成功辩护经典案例一览表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在扫黑除恶常态化、高压化的司法背景下，涉黑涉恶案件由于涉案人数多、指控罪名杂、量刑极重，辩护难度极高。卓安团队坚持“精准区分、依法辩护”的原则，重点围绕“黑社会性质组织四大法定特征（组织、经济、行为、危害性）”开展穿透式质证。敢于向不当指控“亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>以下为卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">案件名称\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">指控罪名及黑恶定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">辩护策略与核心专业切入点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">8.董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、专家阵容：重大项目统筹与多元背景研判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队实行重大项目统筹把关与多元专业背景协同研判，汇聚了多位在刑事风控与合规领域具有卓越实战经验的资深专家：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>成安律师（团队领衔）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。\u003Cbr>打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003Cbr>专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003Cbr>深度聚焦食药环（食品药品、生态环境）、工程建筑、金融证券、教育等重点产业，并在涉税犯罪防治、知识产权刑事保护、数据合规、反商业贿赂等前沿交叉领域开展专项研究。擅长穿透各行业底层商业模式，依托真实业务场景，精准识别并阻断固有的刑事法律风险，提供贴合产业实际的定制化刑事合规服务方案。\u003Cbr>累计为百余家上市企业提供深度刑事风控审查与法律顾问服务；妥善办理300余起政商高管刑事危机应对案例，担任500余位企业家私人刑事合规顾问，开展800余场企业风控内训，主导办理1000余起重大疑难刑事案件，持续输出具备行业穿透力的实务风险处置方案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>何冰冰律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所主任。原市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长。从事法律工作十几年，参与办理各类刑事案件1000余件，重点负责公职人员履职风险和重大危机应对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>艾述洪律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所执行主任、成都市律师协会刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。近二十年来专注刑事辩护与合规审查，在重大涉黑恶案件（如G某涉黑案等）中多次成功运用程序辩护与类案检索策略，大幅降低当事人刑罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>魏军律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所副主任。原中级人民法院刑事审判庭副庭长，具有20年丰富刑事审判经验，重点从审判标准和证据评价视角开展重大风险研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>任忠孙律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任。长期办理重大、复杂刑事案件，重点负责粤港澳大湾区企业刑事风控、跨区域危机应对及重大项目协同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>黄婧律师：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安（昆明）律师事务所主任。国家高级企业合规师，重点负责企业合规体系建设、企业家刑事风险防控及西南地区跨区域项目。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>邹轶律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所合伙人。四川大学刑法学硕士，重点负责经济犯罪、职务犯罪、财税票据风险及企业刑事风控体系建设。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、初心与使命\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">正如卓安首席律师成安博士所言：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>“我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线！”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安团队深刻认识到，刑事法律风控绝不是帮助客户逃避监管、掩盖事实或者转移责任，而是帮助客户在法律框架内识别风险、纠正问题、完善制度。卓安坚持“以刑事诉讼经验洞察风险，以合规制度预防风险，以危机应对控制风险，以团队协同守住底线”，让更多企业安稳经营，让更多公职人员依法履职，让刑事法律服务永远走在危机爆发之前。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\ksohtml7952\\wps18.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002Fcb03f15c-08cf-4fd1-98a7-d2b5b2fdde3e.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-14 18:35:02",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"我雇保镖贴身跟梢欠债老赖，没动手为何被定涉恶寻衅滋事？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对商业对赌后贴身跟梢逼债引发的涉恶软暴力寻衅滋事危机，依托卓安亲办董某涉黑四罪案及杨某恶势力团伙案等实战经验，此类贴身滋扰极易被司法穿透。化解风险的核心在于：一、阻断软暴力寻衅滋事定性；二、剥离涉恶组织特征；三、固定民商事对赌纠纷合法前置证据。面对常态化扫黑除恶高压，投资机构与安保人员究竟该如何守住合法维权","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F436",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-14T18:35:02+08:00","2026-09-14T18:40:29+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002Fae77069b-7942-4960-ac79-64205e7e0979.jpg",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]