[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-433":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,137,141,145,149,153,157,161,166,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":138,"title":139,"thumbnail":10,"summary":140,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":10,"summary":144,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":146,"title":147,"thumbnail":10,"summary":148,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",{"id":150,"title":151,"thumbnail":10,"summary":152,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},268,"X某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪累计近十七万元，团队律师为其辩护，一审终获十年四个月有期徒刑","一、案情简介 胥某利用职务之便，多次对彭某开设的赌场提供保护伞，并收取彭某财物累计十余万元 被告人胥某，男，2014年2月27日因涉嫌受贿罪被某区检察院决定刑事拘留，同日由成都市公安局某区分局执行，同年3月13日因涉嫌受贿罪由成都市市人民检",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":10,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},267,"Z某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 Z某在四川省成都市成立公司非法吸收公众存款获利，自动到成都市公安局高新区分局公安机关投案 被告人Z某，男，2015年9月17日因涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪被成都市公安局高新区分局刑事拘留，同年10月23 日被逮捕。 2013年7月",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},266,"P某涉嫌走私国家禁止进出口货物罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，成功获得缓刑","一、案情简介 在2017年—2019年期间，P某任某农资公司的部门副总经理。公司在没有获得国家行政部门相应许可的情况下，通过伪报贸易国别和目的港的方式，先后分多次将5000余吨的禁止进出口货物出口。 二、案件焦点 1.在任期间职务变动导致P",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":164,"summary":165,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},265,"W某涉嫌生产伪劣产品罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F4bc70f76-2197-428f-bdab-e8f061b4d776.png","一、案情简介 四川XX有限责任公司违反国家药品管理规定，在产品中掺杂、掺假，以不合格产品冒充合格产品，销售金额400余万，被指控构成生产、销售伪劣产品罪，系单位犯罪。 W某被指控为涉案公司的二把手，企业负责人，是涉案药品生产的主要责任人员，",{"id":167,"title":168,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},264,"P某涉嫌走私国家禁止进出口货物罪一案，团队律师为 其辩护，成功获得缓刑",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},263,"为公司节省税费，老总L某修改参数进口设备偷逃税收220余万元，涉嫌走私普通货物被起诉。团队律师一审辩护成功减轻处罚适用缓刑","一、案情简介 2008年5月，被告人L某所在单位要进口一台旋压机设备，该设备按照当时政策进口将缴纳200多万元税收。单位是内地的上市国有单位的子公司，此前也未进口过设备，后找到一报关代理公司代为申报进口事宜，代理公司工作员告知该设备只要将参",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},262,"涉嫌信用卡诈骗，团队律师成功为B某辩护，最终仅获刑六个月且缓刑八个月","一、案情简述 柏某等人涉嫌冒用他人信用卡，被检察院以信用卡诈骗罪提起公诉，一审法院判决被告人柏某构成信用卡诈骗罪，判处拘役六个月，缓刑八个月，判处罚金人民币二万元。 2013年9月，被告人柏某与同案犯到成都市高新区某银行ATM机处取钱，二人",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},433,"2026-09-14 18:40:22","我退居二线受聘民企站台背书领高薪，会被专案组按涉黑定罪吗？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002Fd5c9d53e-a89a-41d7-aea1-c197821f0935.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\ksohtml7952\\wps13.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002F32f99382-76cc-4d68-8a55-0b35ef10bdad.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>针对退居二线公职人员下沉民企领干饷卷入涉黑组织的追责危机，依托卓安亲办孙某涉黑案及董某涉黑案等实战经验，此类挂名站台行为极易招致组织成员认定与涉黑受贿穿透。化解风险的核心在于：一、穿透甄别真实劳务与干饷对价；二、阻断黑社会性质组织成员与保护伞定性；三、剥离影响力受贿与涉黑共犯界限。面对常态化扫黑除恶高压，身陷民企涉黑风暴的二线干部究竟该如何依法自救？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【专业支持】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文由 \u003Cstrong>成安律师（近30年刑事法律实务经验｜百人级刑事专业律师团队｜刑事风控与合规｜刑事危机应对与化解｜重大疑难刑事案件辩护）\u003C\u002Fstrong> 提供法律实务支持。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>成安律师简介：\u003C\u002Fstrong>法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>团队实战经验：\u003C\u002Fstrong>专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“我从局长位置退到二线（挂调研员），被当地一家大型民营物流集团聘为‘高级战略顾问’，不上班每月领五万顾问费。现在这个物流集团老板因为涉嫌‘黑社会行霸’被抓，专案组说我长期拿钱为黑恶企业‘站台背书’，要按‘参加黑社会性质组织罪’和受贿把我也抓进去，我连他们公司具体业务都没碰过，怎么就涉黑了？”在常态化扫黑除恶斗争向重点行业纵深推进的大背景下，这是一位原实权职能局主要领导、现退居二线改任二级调研员的公职人员，在突遭监察调查与公安专案组双重倒查问话前夕，向刑事律师发出的惊慌辩白。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这番充满委屈与不解的辩白，极其典型地折射出部分公职人员在从实权领导岗位转入退居二线阶段时，在法律认知、政商红线以及刑事实务风险上存在的深层盲区：自以为从局长岗位退下后，手中不再直接签批发文、调配资源，利用自身数十年在体制内积累的声望、人脉与“面子”，下沉到民营企业担任挂名“顾问”，纯属民商事领域的专家劳务合作；自以为双方白纸黑字签署了《战略顾问聘用协议》，每月领取的报酬属于形式合法的“专家劳务费”；更自以为只要“不插手具体经营、不上班参与一线排挤、不经办具体货运业务”，就能构筑起阻断刑事风暴的防火墙。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>然而，正如成安律师常年强调的，刑事实务的穿透逻辑从来不看形式上的民商事包装，而是直击利益交换的本质。在常态化扫黑除恶机制下，涉黑涉恶民企对体制内背景干部的渴求，从来不是所谓的商业经营智慧，而是极度看中其身上附着的体制内声誉与潜在政治影响力。当民营物流集团因采取封路拦截、殴打同行、强行垄断货运线路等行霸手段被立案定性为涉黑组织时，二线公职人员长期领取的未实际履职的高额“干饷”，不仅在监察机关法眼下被直接刺穿形式外衣、认定为受贿罪或利用影响力受贿罪，在专案组的穿透式证据链中，更极易被司法推定为“明知涉黑仍为其提供组织支撑、撑场站台的组织成员”或深藏幕后的“涉黑保护伞”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>一、退居二线挂名“战略顾问”领干饷，为何在民企涉黑暴雷时被指控为组织成员？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>在地方经济生态中，物流货运、矿产资源、建筑建工等行业，由于具有强烈的地域属性与对行政监管的高度依赖，历来是有组织犯罪易发高发领域。涉黑势力在通过非法手段垄断货运配载、霸占场站完成原始积累后，其头目最迫切的诉求便是“漂白身份”与寻求政治庇护。他们极度渴望借助体制内干部的“红顶背景”进行政治贴金，在同行面前形成心理震慑，在监管面前形成无形屏障。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>此时，刚退居二线的领导干部便成了民企老板重点猎取的对象。涉黑老板主动贴靠，以尊崇“老领导威望”、指导企业长远发展为名，奉上一纸年薪六十万的聘书。这类“高级顾问”往往具有高度共性：不上班、不打卡、无办公工位；不参与日常经营与账务审计；仅需定期出席企业的开业剪彩、年终盛典或对外宴请，在合影中稳坐主宾席。公职人员往往陶醉于退居二线后依然能够“名利双收”的虚荣之中，误以为这只是一笔合法的咨询劳务报酬。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>然而，一旦公安机关对涉黑物流集团收网抓捕，“打财断血”与“打伞破网”势必联动推进。专案组翻查银行流水，每月固定给公职人员转账五万元、却没有任何实质性劳务成果交付的财务漏洞，瞬间成为核心侦查靶向。办案机关的穿透逻辑极为严密：涉黑组织为何平白供养公职人员？你在企业重大场合抛头露面、撑场站台，客观上向外界传递了“该企业后台深厚”的强烈信号，为涉黑组织形成行业非法控制提供了组织支撑与威慑力依托，这完全符合刑法第294条黑社会性质组织的“组织特征”与“危害性特征”。当形式掩护被剥除，当事人便直接坠入涉黑与职务犯罪的双重深渊。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等四罪案（从重指控中依法剥离积极参加者与定性降格，数罪并罚获从轻判决）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案情背景与指控风险：\u003C\u002Fstrong>被告人董某卷入以杜某为首的涉黑专案。杜某长期在当地从事房屋拆迁与土建工程，指使成员采取断水断电、围堵工厂等手段霸占市场。公诉机关指控董某系涉黑组织骨干成员，并参与多起非法拆迁与巨额索赔，面临数罪并罚被判处十五年以上重刑的极高风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1. 深入穿透资金流水与经济独立性：卓安律师团队依托“控辩审学”一体化研判机制，全面审查上千页卷宗与银行明细，证实董某收益均来源于独立施工劳务，未享受涉黑组织公积金分配，资金流转与涉黑核心资产严格独立；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2. 精准拆解组织特征与层级依附：辩护人详细比对涉黑司法解释，论证董某未参与组织规约制定，未接受涉黑组织人身管理与层级指挥，坚决阻击公诉机关关于“骨干成员”和“积极参加者”的指控定位；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3. 事实穿透与主观非法占有阻断：针对敲诈勒索指控，卓安律师从底层工程合同切入，证实案涉催收源于真实工程欠款，主观上缺乏非法占有目的，客观上未占有该款项，瓦解了敲诈勒索罪要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>法院充分采纳卓安团队关于董某不属于涉黑骨干成员、案涉纠纷具备民商事基础的辩护意见，依法对董某在涉黑组织中的地位予以从轻认定，各罪均大幅从轻处罚，数罪并罚最终决定执行有期徒刑十一年。成安律师指出：“在涉黑案件高压态势下，边缘人员或合作方极易被拔高归罪。法律风控与辩护的关键，在于以细致入微的穿透力审视人身从属性与利益流向，依法斩断将普通合作拔高为涉黑组织的指控链条。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>董某案的深刻教训警示所有身处边缘的公职人员：在常态化扫黑倒查机制下，专案组一旦启动，公职人员名下工资卡、房产乃至家庭合法资产往往瞬间面临全方位查封扣押。若无早期专业的法律审视与证据厘清，个人声誉与家庭基业将在风暴中毁于一旦。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>二、从“红顶站台”到专案组立案，办案机关何以依托穿透式倒查击碎“顾问”伪装？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>许多二线干部在面对专案组调查时普遍心存不解：“我既没有给下属部门打招呼批条子，也没有直接参与过车队任何一次冲突，专案组凭什么认定我构罪？”这种困惑，源于对2026年常态化扫黑除恶跨部门协同倒查机制的缺乏了解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>自《反有组织犯罪法》施行以来，公安机关与纪检监察机关构建了深度的行刑衔接与涉黑大数据穿透机制。在调查涉黑民营物流企业时，侦查机关早在立案抓捕前便通过三维数据闭环完成了证据锁定：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，穿透式资金流审计。专案组调取物流集团财务账册，发现每月固定向特定个人转账数万元“劳务费”，但该账户持有人名下没有任何对等知识成果输出或报税凭据。办案机关比对公职人员任职档案，迅速锁定收款人系退居二线的实权部门原主要领导。无实际对价的异常大额资金流动，从一开始便直接被列为权钱交易重点排查线索。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，客观因果链与威慑力溯源。办案人员在向受害货运司机及竞品物流公司核实案情时，多名证人证言一致反映：“对方老板多次扬言某局长是公司高级顾问，剪彩与年会上局长均在前排就座，大家都知道其后台过硬，被排挤也不敢举报。”这一客观反馈，直接为办案机关认定该公职人员“为涉黑组织提供恶名庇护与心理威慑”提供了有力的证据闭环。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，电子数据与口供印证。专案组扣押涉案民企高管手机后，查获多条关于“请局长站台宴请”、“按月打顾问费维持关系”等沟通记录。涉黑头目到案后，为了争取从宽处理，亦往往主动交代聘请公职人员站台贴金的真实目的。在客观电子痕迹与言词证据相互印证面前，当事人所谓“纯粹民商事劳务”的辩解往往不堪一击。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>三、对照刑法要件与涉黑司法解释，不碰具体业务的“领干饷”究竟触犯了哪些刑事法条？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>解构退居二线干部挂名民企领干饷的法律定性，必须对照刑法条文及两高两部涉黑司法解释，展开刑事实务逻辑的精准剖析：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其一，刑法第二百九十四条参加黑社会性质组织罪要件。根据刑法及相关指导意见，“组织成员”并不以实施暴力打击为单一要件，明知组织性质而接受领导管理、为组织提供实质帮助者同样属于成员。涉黑物流集团以非法手段垄断市场，公职人员挂名顾问为其站台，实质上是为涉黑组织注入了体制内威信这一稀缺资源，为其非法控制提供了心理强制与软实力支撑。控方极易以此论证其具有参加故意与实质帮助行为，从而指控其构成参加黑社会性质组织罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其二，刑法第三百八十五条受贿罪与第三百八十八条之一利用影响力受贿罪。退居二线干部仍具备国家工作人员身份。在位或退二线期间，利用职权或地位形成的便利条件为民企谋取利益，收受所谓的“顾问干饷”，直接构成受贿罪。若利用原职权或地位形成的便利条件，通过其他国家工作人员职务行为为民企谋取不正当利益而收取干饷，则完全触及利用影响力受贿罪。每月数万元且无对价付出的报酬，在司法实务中将被依法推定为贿赂款项。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其三，刑法第二百九十四条第三款包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪的竞合追责。国家机关工作人员包庇、纵容涉黑组织违法犯罪活动的，处五年以下有期徒刑；情节严重的，处五年以上有期徒刑。若公职人员曾利用影响力出面干预行政执法检查或为涉黑人员说情，即构成该罪。司法解释明确规定，国家工作人员收受涉黑组织贿赂又包庇、纵容的，实行数罪并罚。这意味着当事人将面临涉黑与职务犯罪的双重极刑叠加风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>四、自恃“出租面子”纯属民事劳务，下沉民企的公职人员陷入了哪些致命认知盲区？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>剖析涉案公职人员的心理演变，其之所以步入深渊，往往受困于三大人性侥幸与认知盲区：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>盲区之一：误将“权力余温变现”当成合法商业劳务。部分干部自恃退居二线，认为用自身声望与人脉帮企业装点门面获取报酬合情合理。公职人员的社会声望依托于公权力产生，绝非个人私产。一旦将其在市场上明码标价“出租”，实质上是将国家公信力变相出租给资本。没有实际劳动投入的巨额收益，本质就是权钱交易的寻租产物。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>盲区之二：误将“不碰具体业务”当成免责挡箭牌。有组织犯罪具有高度分工性。高级干部在涉黑架构中的核心价值在于“信誉背书与关系网络”，而非一线暴力实施。物理上不经手货运业务，恰恰反向印证了其未实际履行商业顾问职责；而频频亮相站台，则坐实了其提供组织庇护的客观事实。将业务不参与等同于法律不归责，是对共犯原理的重大误判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>盲区之三：误将“顾问合同与纳税记录”当成免责屏障。部分公职人员自恃签署了正规协议、依法扣缴了个税，便能高枕无忧。但刑事审判始终坚持穿透式审查原则。专案组调取其专业背景、工作交付物、同行业顾问市场公允薪酬三项核心要素进行比对。缺乏专业资质与劳动成果的高额进账，直接暴露出合同的形式伪装，反而成为受贿犯罪的直接客观书证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>五、面对纪检专案组上门调查，盲目串供退赃与寻找“关系”会引发哪些作死悲剧？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>在风暴突降、调查传票送达之际，当事人极易因惊慌失措而采取一系列反噬自身的错误操作：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，连夜补签虚假咨询文书与倒签会议纪要。不少干部在获知老板被捕后，连夜组织编写虚假的行业规划报告、补办咨询签字，企图证明实际履职。在现代电子数据取证与墨水理化鉴定面前，文书生成时间与修改痕迹一目了然。这种拙劣行径不仅无法自证清白，反而会招致伪造证据罪或妨害作证罪的追加指控，彻底封死从宽道路。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，私下退还干饷并与涉案人员家属串供。部分人员惊慌之下将收受的干饷退还家属并订立攻守同盟，谎称资金系个人借款。司法解释早已明确，闻风退赃不影响受贿罪的成立。更为危险的是，与涉黑家属私下接触的录音录像一旦被调取，当事人将直接被认定为串供拒证，羁押与惩处措施将全面升级。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，病急乱投医，轻信“司法掮客”搞地下运作。家属在恐慌之下极易相信宣称“能摆平专案组”的说客，最终钱财遭骗且贻误宝贵时机。成安律师始终告诫：在常态化扫黑机制下，专案实行异地用警与穿透式审查，只有依托阳光下的专业辩护与证据死磕，才是化解危机的正途。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>六、面对涉黑涉贿交织指控，如何构建“四维抗辩隔离墙”实现精准拆解与降格出罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>面对涉黑与涉贿并行的严峻指控，专业辩护的核心在于穿透表面定性，构建多维度的抗辩隔离墙：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一步：事实穿透与履职甄别，厘清真实劳务与干饷对价。全面复盘受聘期间的工作细节，梳理有无利用原职权直接施压、批条子等事实。全面固定曾参与的合规指导、政策宣讲等真实劳动痕迹，力争依法将合理劳务报酬从指控金额中扣除，阻断单一受贿定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二步：组织特征拆解与主观明知阻断，斩断涉黑成员定性。紧扣涉黑犯罪四个法定特征，论证当事人与涉黑组织不存在人身依附与组织规约制约；论证顾问费来源于民事合同而非涉黑资产分配；更关键在于论证主观上对企业底层暴力行霸完全不知情，阻断积极参加者定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三步：罪名精准降格与财产物理隔离。对于确实存在不当收受款项的情节，重点论证二线公职人员职权消解状态，争取从受贿罪降格为量刑显著偏轻的利用影响力受贿罪；严格执行涉案财产处置规定，将合法家庭财产从“打财断血”追缴清单中全面剥离。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】孙某等45人特大涉黑案（禁止重复评价与阻断积极参加者认定，成功突破严苛量刑建议获大幅从轻裁判）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案情背景与指控风险：\u003C\u002Fstrong>被告人孙某在某知名房产企业任职，董事长涉黑案发后，全案被公诉机关指控为特大涉黑犯罪集团。孙某被控为涉黑组织成员，涉嫌聚众斗殴及隐匿、故意销毁公司财务凭证等重罪。检察院最初提出不认罪认罚情况下十年六个月的极重建议，审判阶段仍坚持九至十一年重判建议。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1. 阻断标志性事件认定与轻罪剥离：卓安律师团队（杨巽律师、晏建强律师等）深入剖析案情，指出案涉聚众斗殴源于普通经济纠纷，未造成严重后果，依法阻断其作为涉黑组织标志性事件的指控；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2. 精准拆解组织特征与地位降格：辩护人详细论证孙某仅系普通受聘人员，未参与核心决策与非法利益分配，依法不能被认定为涉黑积极参加者；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3. 创立“禁止重复评价”出罪防线：针对销毁账册指控，律师从缺乏期待可能性原理切入，论证若认定其为涉黑成员，则其销毁自身涉案证据不应与参加黑社会性质组织罪重复评价，坚决捍卫刑事实体法公正。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong>经过多日高强度法庭交锋，法院全盘采纳了卓安律师关于禁止重复评价、孙某不属于积极参加者的核心辩护意见。法院踩着建议刑底线，判处孙某有期徒刑九年，并将罚金从20万元大幅核减至13万元。成安律师指出：“涉黑辩护极为艰难。卓安依托‘三级品控体系’与‘大案专家会诊’，始终坚持以严密的证据裁判规则为准绳，在庞杂卷宗中挖掘法理防线，实现精准辩护。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>七、身陷民企涉黑风暴，公职人员及家属该如何对照专业清单自查自救？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>为帮助身处民企挂名顾问风险边缘的公职人员、退职干部及其家属系统排查隐患，卓安刑事风控与合规团队根据现行司法审判标准，制定了以下专业排查清单：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">风险维度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">高危表象特征与定性倾向\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">办案机关穿透核查焦点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">风控自救与专业阻断策略\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">顾问履职真实性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">不上班、不打卡，无固定办公场所；缺乏书面工作交付物；每月固定领取数万元“干饷”，极易被推定为受贿。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">查验有无真实的商业规划方案、研讨会议纪要；薪酬是否严重偏离同行业公允市场咨询水准。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">梳理并合法固定历史真实的宏观政策解读、合规建言痕迹；严格厘清真实劳务与虚假挂名的金额界限。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">涉黑组织关联度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">频繁出席民企庆典、站台剪彩；企业对外宣扬公职人员顾问背景；在企业暴力争夺市场暴雷后被列为涉黑骨干成员。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">核查是否参与涉黑核心层级会议；是否享受非法行业垄断利润分红；站台行为是否对被害人造成现实威慑。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">紧扣涉黑“四个特征”，论证人身依附缺失与组织纪律割裂；论证对企业暴力垄断行为缺乏主观明知，阻断积极参加者定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">权力滥用与干预\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">曾向下属或相关行政职能部门人员打招呼、说情；在民企面临环保、市监、交通执法检查时出面宴请平事。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">调取行政审批与执法处罚卷宗；核查在职执法人员证言；排查是否存在利用职权干预司法的通信往来。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">严格依法还原事件原貌，论证公职人员出面行为是否具备法定职责约束力；坚决阻断包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪的重罪定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">财产查封与穿透\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">因民企涉案导致公职人员全家资产、房产、银行卡突遭专案组冻结扣押；办案机关拟将全部所得按黑财追缴。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">穿透审查顾问费资金流向；核查公职人员家庭大额财产的形成时间、合法收入来源与涉案民企资金的交织度。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">建立家庭合法财产防火墙；严格区分涉案资金与家庭合法薪酬、继承、理财等财产；依规提起涉案财物甄别与异议审查。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"112\">早期应急处置\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"174\">突闻民企老板被抓后心慌意乱，企图连夜伪造假合同、退还干饷并与涉案人员家属串供；轻信社会掮客花钱捞人。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">专案组重点监控涉案人员通信、行踪及异常资金转移；对事后突击补办文书实施电子数据与笔迹司法鉴定。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"168\">坚决杜绝一切串供与伪造证据行为；立刻终止与涉案人员私下接触；在第一时间聘请专业刑事律师介入，通过合法程序依法应对。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>八、面对突发复杂刑政风暴，什么样的专业辩护力量才能坚守法律底线与程序正义？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>公职人员退居二线挂名民企涉黑涉贿案件，往往横跨行政监察调查、公安涉黑刑侦与检察穿透式审查起诉三大阶段，是刑事司法实务中最具综合性、风险最集中、办案阻力最大的疑难大案。在这样的惊涛骇浪面前，委托普通民刑通吃的万金油律师，或者轻信虚妄的潜规则运作，往往会导致当事人步步踩雷、坠入深渊。能够真正化解此类生死危机的，只有深耕刑事专业领域的精锐之师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这正是四川卓安律师事务所十余年如一日坚守的执业阵地。作为中国第三家只专注刑事业务的精品专业化律师事务所，卓安自2013年创立之日起，便毅然走上了一条独特的“专精特新”之路——坚决不接非诉项目，坚决不碰民商事合同，将全部智慧、资源与精力毫无保留地投入到刑事领域这一座“窄门”之中。从成都总部到深圳、昆明、重庆、西宁、达州等一体化分所，卓安汇聚了近百名专职刑事律师，成为中国刑事法治领域不可忽视的专业高地。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在卓安的办案体系中，最令同行称道的是其独创的“控、辩、审、学”四维办案视角。团队中近三分之一的律师具有原法院刑事审判庭、检察院公诉科与反贪侦查部门的资深从业背景，拥有11位法学博士及30余位法学硕士。卓安律师事务所主任兼党支部书记何冰冰律师，曾任市级检察院反贪局侦查科科长、首批员额检察官与公诉人，从事法律工作十余年，亲历各类复杂职务犯罪与公职人员履职危机案件上千件，对监察调查与刑事公诉的思维逻辑有着刻入骨髓的敏锐洞察。当每一个疑难涉黑涉恶或职务犯罪案件进入卓安，团队立即启动大案专家会诊机制：前公诉人以挑剔眼光预演控方证据短板，前法官以中立尺度把控量刑底线，法学博士以法理深度构建出罪防线，资深刑辩律师以锐利视角主导法庭交锋，从而形成体系化、全方位的防护纵深。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>与此同时，卓安在业内首创了“律师+客户经理”的双线服务模式。面对突如其来的涉黑涉贿抓捕，公职人员家属往往面临精神瓦解与信息黑洞的双重折磨。卓安的客户经理团队在整个诉讼进程中全程陪伴，实时沟通办案进展，提供专业的心理辅导与情绪支撑，保障家属的知情权与参与权；而诉讼律师团队则心无旁骛地扑在堆积如山的卷宗中，死磕每一个法定要件，用专业力量承接当事人的生命与自由之托。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>走进卓安律师事务所，最先映入眼帘的是由卓安发起创办的中国首座“刑辩文化馆”。这里记录着中国刑事辩护制度波澜壮阔的演进史，镌刻着卓安团队办理刘汉案、李昌奎案、南充系列贿选案等全国标志性大案的辉煌篇章。文化馆的展板上，凝聚着成安博士与卓安团队的核心执业信仰：“为生命辩护，为自由辩护。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>刑事风控与刑事辩护，从来不止于白纸黑字的案卷，更关乎活生生的人心与一个家庭的兴衰荣辱。在时代转型的浪潮中，每一位从体制内走出的干部都应当对法治保持敬畏，在诱惑面前守住红线；而在风暴降临的至暗时刻，卓安愿以专业的素养做当事人坚固的法律盾牌，用看得见的程序正义与专业透明，传递法治的理性与温度。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【本文核心议题与场景指南】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>适用人群：\u003C\u002Fstrong>退居二线公职人员、挂职调研员、退休体制内干部、民营企业高薪顾问、民企实控人及高管\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>核心风险罪名：\u003C\u002Fstrong>参加黑社会性质组织罪、受贿罪、利用影响力受贿罪、包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>关键实务场景：\u003C\u002Fstrong>下沉民企领干饷、挂名高级顾问、企业站台背书、打财断血财产追缴、政商关系防火墙构建\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>风控与辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>实际履职证据固定、劳务报酬与干饷对价甄别、组织特征阻断、主观明知剥离、涉黑财产与合法财产物理隔离\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【附录】卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队及实战成果全览\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、品牌定位与文化特色：全国知名的刑事精品律所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，毅然选择了一条极其纯粹的“专精特新”之路——将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>文化基因：只做刑事，拒绝万金油。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安打破了传统律师单兵作战、兼顾多领域的模式，按犯罪类别与程序性质，细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>办案模式：“控、辩、审、学”四维体系。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队中近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历；汇聚了11位法学博士及30余位法学硕士。每一个重大疑难案件均由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，形成降维打击式的集体辩护体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>核心信仰：为生命辩护，为自由辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安不仅关注冰冷的法条，更将当事人的尊严、心理状态、家庭未来纳入服务体系，致力于让刑事法律服务真正具备“专业力度与人文温度”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、优异的办案数据与核心成绩\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">依托近三十年刑事法律服务经验，卓安团队在业内打下了深厚的专业壁垒。数据是实力的最好背书：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>累计办理刑事案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：8000余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>全国重大影响案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>实现出罪化及免除刑责处理（含无罪判决、各类型不起诉及撤销案件）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶案件“脱黑摘帽”\u002F重罪降格\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：30余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>死刑案件成功保命\u002F改判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：60余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>客户满意度及锦旗回馈\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：常年保持95%以上，累计收到当事人及家属赠送的锦旗600余面。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队致力于将法律服务前移：在风险发生前帮助客户识别边界、完善制度；在危机初发时梳理事实、依法应对；在风险进入刑事程序后，与诉讼团队无缝协同衔接，提供全生命周期的刑事风控服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪成功辩护经典案例一览表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在扫黑除恶常态化、高压化的司法背景下，涉黑涉恶案件由于涉案人数多、指控罪名杂、量刑极重，辩护难度极高。卓安团队坚持“精准区分、依法辩护”的原则，重点围绕“黑社会性质组织四大法定特征（组织、经济、行为、危害性）”开展穿透式质证。敢于向不当指控“亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>以下为卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">案件名称\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">指控罪名及黑恶定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">辩护策略与核心专业切入点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">8.董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、专家阵容：重大项目统筹与多元背景研判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队实行重大项目统筹把关与多元专业背景协同研判，汇聚了多位在刑事风控与合规领域具有卓越实战经验的资深专家：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>成安律师（团队领衔）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。\u003Cbr>打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003Cbr>专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003Cbr>深度聚焦食药环（食品药品、生态环境）、工程建筑、金融证券、教育等重点产业，并在涉税犯罪防治、知识产权刑事保护、数据合规、反商业贿赂等前沿交叉领域开展专项研究。擅长穿透各行业底层商业模式，依托真实业务场景，精准识别并阻断固有的刑事法律风险，提供贴合产业实际的定制化刑事合规服务方案。\u003Cbr>累计为百余家上市企业提供深度刑事风控审查与法律顾问服务；妥善办理300余起政商高管刑事危机应对案例，担任500余位企业家私人刑事合规顾问，开展800余场企业风控内训，主导办理1000余起重大疑难刑事案件，持续输出具备行业穿透力的实务风险处置方案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>何冰冰律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所主任。原市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长。从事法律工作十几年，参与办理各类刑事案件1000余件，重点负责公职人员履职风险和重大危机应对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>艾述洪律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所执行主任、成都市律师协会刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。近二十年来专注刑事辩护与合规审查，在重大涉黑恶案件（如G某涉黑案等）中多次成功运用程序辩护与类案检索策略，大幅降低当事人刑罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>魏军律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所副主任。原中级人民法院刑事审判庭副庭长，具有20年丰富刑事审判经验，重点从审判标准和证据评价视角开展重大风险研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>任忠孙律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任。长期办理重大、复杂刑事案件，重点负责粤港澳大湾区企业刑事风控、跨区域危机应对及重大项目协同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>黄婧律师：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安（昆明）律师事务所主任。国家高级企业合规师，重点负责企业合规体系建设、企业家刑事风险防控及西南地区跨区域项目。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>邹轶律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所合伙人。四川大学刑法学硕士，重点负责经济犯罪、职务犯罪、财税票据风险及企业刑事风控体系建设。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、初心与使命\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">正如卓安首席律师成安博士所言：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>“我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线！”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安团队深刻认识到，刑事法律风控绝不是帮助客户逃避监管、掩盖事实或者转移责任，而是帮助客户在法律框架内识别风险、纠正问题、完善制度。卓安坚持“以刑事诉讼经验洞察风险，以合规制度预防风险，以危机应对控制风险，以团队协同守住底线”，让更多企业安稳经营，让更多公职人员依法履职，让刑事法律服务永远走在危机爆发之前。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\ksohtml7952\\wps14.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002F45c0d060-5b91-419d-ba07-f74b596b5524.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-14 18:34:58",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"我退居二线受聘民企站台背书领高薪，会被专案组按涉黑定罪吗？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对退居二线公职人员下沉民企领干饷卷入涉黑组织的追责危机，依托卓安亲办孙某涉黑案及董某涉黑案等实战经验，此类挂名站台行为极易招致组织成员认定与涉黑受贿穿透。化解风险的核心在于：一、穿透甄别真实劳务与干饷对价；二、阻断黑社会性质组织成员与保护伞定性；三、剥离影响力受贿与涉黑共犯界限。面对常态化扫黑除恶高压，身陷","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F433",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-14T18:34:58+08:00","2026-09-14T18:40:22+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F14\u002Fd5c9d53e-a89a-41d7-aea1-c197821f0935.jpg",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]