[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-401":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},401,"2026-09-11 16:49:53","我是基层国土所长，对恶霸违建未予处罚会被追究涉黑纵容罪吗？ ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F11\u002Fa541f435-157d-4511-895f-683e548a705e.png","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\ksohtml2736\\wps35.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F11\u002Ff2255326-0899-498f-8ce6-598296548be8.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>针对基层执法公职人员因畏难退让对宗族恶势力“行政不作为”被升格定性为涉黑纵容罪的危机，依托卓安亲办“陈某涉黑案（全案脱黑）”等实战积淀，化解核心在于：一、阻断怠于履职与放任黑恶势力发展的主观故意推导；二、严格剥离行政执法阻力与涉黑非法保护因果关联；三、精准纠偏行政失职与涉黑渎职重罪法定界限。在常态化扫黑倒查风暴下，身处基层的执法人员究竟该如何守住责任底线？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【专业支持】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>本文由\u003C\u002Fspan> \u003Cstrong>成安律师（近30年刑事法律实务经验｜百人级刑事专业律师团队｜刑事风控与合规｜刑事危机应对与化解｜重大疑难刑事案件辩护）\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">提供法律实务支持。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>成安律师简介：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>团队实战经验：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">“村里那个宗族恶霸家族强占集体土地建祠堂，还霸占水库。村民多次向我们国土所举报，但因为他们家族势力太大，每次下村查访他们都带人围堵所里车辆，我为了避免流血冲突就一直按住没下行政处罚决定。这顶多算工作失职，怎么专案组和检察院要按“包庇纵容涉黑组织”法办我？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在2026年的当下，伴随着常态化扫黑除恶斗争向基层末梢的纵深挺进，宗族恶势力与乡村“行霸、村霸”问题成为纪法贯通、重点清算的深水区。身处一线的国土资源所长、环保所长、综合行政执法中队长或基层派出所民警，往往处于国家公权力与乡土熟人社会的撕裂夹缝之中。一方面是法定的监管职责，另一方面是宗族恶霸动辄纠集数十名宗族成员围堵执法、阻挠办案的现实威胁。许多基层干部在软弱畏难、多一事不如少一事的逃避心态驱使下，往往选择“缓一缓、拖一拖、按下不发”，自认为只要不拿对方一分钱，这种行政不作为充其量属于履职不力的工作失误。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">然而，刑事司法的严肃性从来不会迁就基层的懦弱妥协。当昔日的宗族恶霸被专案机关最终定性为黑社会性质组织时，公权力机关长期的退让与不作为，在专案组严密的证据逆推链条中，将不再被视为寻常的履职瑕疵，而是直接演变为国家公职人员“故意纵容黑恶势力坐大成势”的涉案指控。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、面对宗族恶霸围堵执法车辆，退让息事为何引来了涉黑指控？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在基层治理的现实图景中，宗族势力的恶性膨胀往往遵循着一条由浅入深的轨迹。在部分宗族宗法观念浓厚、血缘宗亲盘根错节的乡镇农村，某些恶霸家族依仗人多势众，先是从侵占集体荒山、强占水源鱼塘起家，进而霸占公益性集体土地私建宗族祠堂，甚至垄断本村的建材运输、工程分包。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在这个演变过程中，基层执法所站并非全然失察。村民的信访举报往往数以十计，卫星遥感图斑的违法线索也清晰可查。然而，当三五名基层执法人员开着执法车进村调查时，迎接他们的往往是紧闭的大门、手持农具围堵的妇女老人，甚至是恶霸头目指使年轻后生对执法车辆的肆意打砸与言语恐吓。在缺乏强力治安警力协同保障的情况下，基层所长往往面临两难：强行执法可能直接诱发群体性流血事件，自身人身安全亦无保障；退回所里，依法应当作出的《责令停止违法行为通知书》或《行政处罚决定书》，却因畏难情绪被长期搁置在抽屉深处。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">这种被动退让，在客观上却成为了恶霸家族向外宣示“公权力拿我也没办法”的活广告。村民见官方查处雷声大雨点小，愈发陷入绝望而不敢反抗；恶霸家族则愈发肆无忌惮，逐步建立起在当地村庄的非法控制。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">专案组在异地调警、对宗族涉黑组织收网之后，首要任务就是倒查该组织何以能在长达数年的时间里持续违法却未受实质制裁。当专案组从国土所档案室调出被长期压下未办的群众举报信、被暂缓执行的处罚审批表时，办案人员做出的第一判断绝非体谅基层的执法艰难，而是直接认定：这是国家机关工作人员明知存在涉黑恶违法行为，却利用职权故意不履行查禁职责，充当了黑恶势力的“隐形纵容者”。在卓安律师事务所经办的大量涉黑涉恶重案中，基层公权力退却导致的黑恶泛滥与沉重司法清算令人警醒。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】唐某某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪等六罪一案（二审维持原判执行二十年）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>案情背景与指控风险\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：自2008年起，以张某为首的黑社会性质组织在四川德昌、西昌等地盘踞多年，实施聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事、开设赌场、抢劫、非法拘禁等一系列暴力违法犯罪活动，致多人死伤。尤为严重的是，该涉黑组织不仅对当地火车站货物运输形成了非法控制、严重破坏当地营商环境，组织成员唐某某还在首要分子张某的支持下，利用黑恶势力的恶劣影响侵入基层政权，先后担任某村文书、村支部书记及地方人大代表，对当地政治生态与基层公共秩序造成严重破坏。公诉机关对唐某某提起参加黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪指控，面临极其严厉的刑罚制裁。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. 深度梳理海量卷宗与跨区域事实材料，精准界定行业非法控制与基层组织侵入背后的因果逻辑，全面核查指控证据链的薄弱环节；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. 紧扣黑社会性质组织法定特征，针对指控唐某某具体参与的个案行为展开细致甄别，主张严格区分组织性暴力犯罪与具体基层履职行为的边界；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">3. 从证据裁判规则出发，积极与承办检察官、合议庭沟通，就具体指控提出定性存疑与量刑从宽的专业意见。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：法院经审理认为，唐某某积极参加涉黑组织，不仅参与开设赌场、抢劫等严重犯罪，更利用黑恶势力渗透基层政权、破坏基层秩序，依法判处参加黑社会性质组织罪等六罪，数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑二十年，剥夺政治权利二年，并处没收个人全部财产；二审法院裁定驳回上诉、维持原判。成安律师在复盘基层涉黑犯罪演变时深刻指出：“基层公权力的失守与退避，往往是宗族恶霸与黑恶团伙滋生坐大的温床。司法机关在深挖彻查基层涉黑乱象时，对任何放任甚至协助黑恶势力侵害乡村秩序的行为采取严惩态度。基层公职人员若以‘地方复杂’为由擅离职守、任由恶霸控制基层，终将在从严惩治的司法审判中付出沉重的人身与自由代价。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">唐某某案的发展轨迹揭示了常态化扫黑除恶的深层规律：乡村基层的黑恶垄断一旦成型，司法机关在清理黑恶犯罪的同时，必将对失职弃守、造成非法控制蔓延的公权力履职链条展开地毯式的刑事追责。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、行政不作为与纵容涉黑，在刑法教义学上的分水岭究竟在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在司法实务中，许多基层干部深感冤枉：“我既没有向他们通风报信，也没有收受他们的财物，我只是工作没有做到位、害怕发生冲突，顶多构成玩忽职守或行政违纪，怎么直接被套上了刑法第二百九十四条第三款的涉黑罪名？”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">要穿透这一指控的定性迷雾，必须回到刑法教义学与扫黑除恶专门司法解释的严格规范中展开辨析：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">首先，依据《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十四条第三款，包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪规制的是“国家机关工作人员包庇黑社会性质的组织，或者纵容黑社会性质的组织进行违法犯罪活动”的行为。根据两高两部《关于办理利用职务便利充当黑恶势力“保护伞”的有关规定》，国家机关工作人员对黑恶势力违法犯罪活动“有案不立、立而不查、查而不实，放任其坐大成势”，或者“阻挠、干扰执法机关查处”的，依法认定为该罪。\u003Cbr>该罪的核心构成要件在于：行为人在主观上必须具备\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>故意\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。在实务认定中，所谓“纵容”，是指负有查禁、监管职责的国家工作人员，在明知该组织从事违法犯罪活动的情况下，故意不履行法定职责，听之任之，放任危害后果的发生。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">其次，在区分“纵容涉黑罪”与刑法第三百九十七条“玩忽职守罪”时，刑法理论存在明确的界限：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>主观罪过形态的本质差异\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。玩忽职守罪是过失犯罪，表现为行为人由于严重不负责任、疏忽大意或过于自信，未能预见或轻信能够避免危害结果；而纵容黑社会性质组织罪必须是故意犯罪，行为人必须明知涉案对象属于违法犯罪组织，且对其违法犯罪活动采取有意的容忍、放任态度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>客观归责要素的因果关联\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。玩忽职守罪要求造成“公共财产、国家和人民利益遭受重大损失”的法定后果；而纵容涉黑罪的成立，则要求行为人的不作为与黑恶势力的存续、蔓延、坐大以及形成非法控制之间，具有刑法上的纵容与助力关系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">再次，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>“恶势力犯罪集团”与“黑社会性质组织”的适用红线\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。必须高度明确的是，刑法第二百九十四条第三款的罪名严格限定为“包庇、纵容黑社会性质组织罪”，我国现行刑法体系中\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>不存在“纵容恶势力犯罪集团罪”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。如果被查办的宗族家族最终仅被认定为“恶势力犯罪集团”或“恶势力团伙”，对其进行不作为的公职人员，绝不能直接适用刑法第294条第3款定罪！此时，办案机关若追究其刑事责任，只能在刑法第三百九十七条【玩忽职守罪】或【滥用职权罪】的构成要件内进行严格审查，追究其过失或渎职责任，而绝不能随意类推适用以积极作为为特征的重罪。办案机关若在涉恶定性下生搬硬套涉黑纵容罪，属于违反罪刑法定原则的定性拔高。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">最后，基层干部的核心风险在于：专案组往往采取“客观结果倒推主观故意”的经验主义推定——既然你接到了群众反复举报，既然你明知他们强占水库、违法建房，而你长达数年未开出一张生效罚单，未采取任何强制拆除措施，那么你就属于“故意不履行职责”，进而被推定为具有放任其称霸一方的故意。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、“我没收钱只是怕引发群体性冲突”，这种辩解为何难挡司法追责？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">面对纪检监察机关的谈话调查与检察院的审查起诉，涉案基层干部最常用的抗辩理由往往是：“我一分钱没拿，我们所里就三四个人，对方一纠集就是上百个村民，我们去执法就是去送死，我是为了保全大局、防止引发大规模群体性流血事件才暂缓执法的。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">这种看似合乎情理的解释，在严苛的刑事司法证据审查面前，往往极易沦为空洞的托词，其背后隐藏着基层公职人员的三重深层侥幸：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">其一，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>误以为“零受贿”等于“免刑责”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。在许多干部的潜意识中，只有收了黑钱才算保护伞。然而，刑法第294条第3款的纵容黑社会性质组织罪，以及刑法第397条的玩忽职守罪，均属于典型的纯正职务犯罪，其成立绝不以“收受贿赂”或“谋取私利”为法定前置条件。在司法实践中，“因私废公、不敢担当、明哲保身”的不作为，一旦造成恶霸盘踞、民怨沸腾的严重后果，同样属于严厉追究刑事责任的渎职范畴。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">其二，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>混淆了“客观不能”与“消极怠政”的法律边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。刑法不强人所难，如果执法机关确实面临无法克服的客观物理阻碍（如遭遇严重的暴力抗法），公职人员确实可以主张主观上缺乏纵容故意。然而，法律认可的“客观不能”，要求执法人员必须穷尽法定的职权救济路径——当你遭遇宗族恶霸围堵阻挠时，你是否现场拨打了110报警？是否向县级自然资源局呈报了书面阻挠执法报告？是否向乡镇党委政府提出过启动多部门联合执法的书面请示？如果上述任何正式的公文流转与救济动作都不存在，仅仅是在口头上称“对方势力大没办法”，那么在法官眼里，这种没有任何书面痕迹的退让，根本不是“客观不能”，而是赤裸裸的消极弃守与选择性放纵。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">其三，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>忽视了“内部行政审批拖延”对涉恶势力形成的实质庇护效果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。某些基层所长为了维持表面的息事宁人，对宗族恶霸的违法行为不仅不立案，甚至在上级自然资源部门或信访部门批转督办函时，私下以“正在调查核实中”、“双方正在协调调解”等虚假理由回复上级，变相为恶霸势力的持续违建争取了充裕的时间。这种对外欺瞒上级、对下压制群众的操作，早已超越了寻常的懦弱畏难，在证据上被直接评价为帮助恶霸势力抵御执法查处的“包庇行为”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、专案组立案倒查之时，哪些消极应对的昏招会坐实纵容黑恶恶意？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">当涉恶宗族恶霸家族的主要头目被异地公安机关采取刑事强制措施，专案组调取历年信访件与查处台账之时，身处风暴边缘的基层执法人员往往陷入极度恐慌。卓安刑事风控团队通过对大量涉伞倒查案例的深度梳理发现，公职人员在此时采取的以下几类非理智举动，往往直接坐实了原本尚可抗辩的“主观故意”：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>突击补做当年的现场勘验笔录与倒签下达处罚决定\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：为了证明自己“当年查过”，连夜找所内人员补签数年前的《责令停止违法行为通知书》，甚至伪造当年的送达回证，企图证明行政机关早已依法履职。在现代文书司法鉴定技术与电子政务留痕系统面前，纸张墨水沉降分析与系统修改时间戳会瞬间揭穿谎言。这种行为非但不能免责，反而涉嫌构成滥用职权罪甚至伪造国家机关公文罪，并在监察调查中被定性为顶风作案、对抗审查；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>私下联系恶霸家族尚未被抓的亲属“统一说法”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：找到恶霸家族留守人员，要求对方在专案组问话时咬定“当年所里下达过处罚通知，是我们自己不听”，试图将责任全部推卸为单纯的当事人违法。在侦查机关提级管辖、技术侦查全面布控的态势下，此类串联行为往往被全程监听固定，导致公职人员直接被认定为与涉黑恶团伙存在深度利益勾连，彻底丧失认罪认罚与罪轻抗辩的生机；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">3. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>销毁群众举报信件、信访批转单或值班接报记录\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：企图通过将历史上的信访登记簿“遗失”或抽取特定举报件，造成“当时所里并未接到过任何举报、因此不知情”的假象。现代信访与接警系统均有省市级多网留痕，单方销毁基层纸质台账，不仅在技术上无法掩盖事实，而且该行为在刑法上会被直接作为行为人“明知违法犯罪而蓄意掩盖包庇”的核心主观恶性证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安律师事务所始终秉持严苛的执业底线与职业伦理：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>坚决杜绝虚假承诺，坚决反对任何形式的弄虚作假与违法操作\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。在纪法贯通的高压倒查下，任何不合法的自保手段都是自掘坟墓。唯一的出路，是在专业刑事律师的介入下，回归事实本原与程序规范，展开严密的法理剖析与证据重组。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、如何运用证据精细化质证，将履职受阻从涉黑纵容中彻底剥离？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">公职人员在复杂基层环境中的退却与失范固然应当受到法纪审视，但在刑事司法体系中，绝不能任由情绪化的严打倾向将其无底线地升格为涉黑重罪。卓安刑事辩护团队在处理此类刑行交叉、公权力涉恶案件中，总结出了一套行之有效的三位一体质证与防御方案：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第一步：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>穿透“客观阻碍”证据链，阻断纵容犯罪的故意推导\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。辩护律师应当立即开展逆向取证，全面梳理基层执法所站当年的客观履职受限事实：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. 调取当年执法人员下村巡查时的现场行车记录仪、执法记录仪音视频，还原执法车辆确实遭到宗族恶霸围堵、执法人员人身受到威胁的真实场景；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. 收集国土所就该起违法占地行为向乡镇党委政府、上级自然资源局所作的书面请示、情况通报或办公会汇报记录，证明所里曾主动提出过因遭遇暴力抗法申请联合执法的诉求；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">3. 证明不予作出行政处罚决定或未予强制执行，系因乡镇党委或上级机关出于化解群体性矛盾、维稳综合考量而作出的统筹决策，基层所长个人并无故意放纵黑恶势力滋生蔓延的主观犯意。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第二步：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>借力法定特征精准质证，阻击主案涉黑定性以瓦解保护伞根基\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。刑法第二百九十四条第三款的纵容涉黑罪，以涉案团伙合法成立“黑社会性质组织”为先决条件。如果主案本身的定性存在严重拔高，辩护律师应当精准发力，从底层瓦解涉黑犯罪基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案（成功打掉涉黑罪名，仅获轻刑有期徒刑一年）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>案情背景与指控风险\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：上世纪九十年代，被告人陈某高中辍学后跟随其兄开采沙金，先后纠集多名同学与老乡，在某县城及乡镇实施了聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等一系列违法犯罪活动，形成了一定社会影响。公诉机关指控其团伙形成所谓不成文规矩，逐步演变为以陈某为组织者、领导者的黑社会性质组织，依法面临十年以上有期徒刑乃至更严厉的重罪惩处。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. 律师团队接受委托后立即调阅全部案卷，确立坚决作“不构成黑社会性质组织罪”的定性剥离辩护策略；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. 紧扣黑社会性质组织法定的四大特征展开深入质证，精准指出涉案团伙成员纯粹依靠同学、老乡的“哥们义气”等松散社交纽带维系，根本缺乏黑社会性质组织所必须具备的组织纪律、活动规约以及严密的层级结构；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">3. 深入论证涉案采矿冲突系分散的市场利益之争，未在行业内形成非法控制，且缺乏国家工作人员包庇纵容的非法保护特征，依法难以被认定为黑社会性质组织。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：法院经审理，全盘采纳了卓安辩护律师关于不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的辩护意见，依法彻底打掉涉黑罪名。陈某仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金5万元。成安律师在复盘该案时指出：“面对严苛的涉黑指控，辩护律师必须敢于切中‘组织特征’与‘非法保护’的实质缺失。通过严格把控刑法法定要件，剥离缺乏严密纪律与层级的黑恶标签，这是从根基上瓦解涉黑指控、防范重罪重罚的关键路径。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">陈某案的成功经验表明：基层宗族恶霸即便存在暴力强占、打架斗殴行为，如果在组织结构上松散无序、缺乏明确规约与稳定的经济反哺机制，依法就不能认定为黑社会性质组织。只要律师通过精细化辩护将主案从“黑社会”降格为普通恶势力团伙甚至普通共同犯罪，那么依附其上的刑法第294条第3款“纵容黑社会性质组织罪”就会直接丧失法定构成要件，不攻自破。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第三步：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>坚决发起罪名纠偏，推动指控回归行政纪律处分或过失类轻罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">。通过论证公职人员在履职过程中缺乏“故意”纵容的心态，将争议焦点精准引导至履职不当、监管不到位等行政过失范畴。即便造成的客观后果严重，亦应全力推动案由向刑法第三百九十七条【玩忽职守罪】靠拢，并结合公职人员未收受贿赂、未谋取私利、初犯偶犯以及基层执法客观条件受限等法定、酌定从宽情节，全力争取检察机关作出相对不起诉决定，或在法院阶段争取判处缓刑乃至免予刑事处罚，最大限度保全当事人的人身自由。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、身处基层复杂执法环境，公职人员应当如何对照建立免责防火墙？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">针对基层国土、环保、城管及治安执法等高危风险岗位，卓安团队根据多年实务积淀，梳理了下述排查指引：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">风险排查维度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心隐患表象\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">专案组推定逻辑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">卓安合规隔离与辩护策略\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">线索处置台账\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">收到群众实名或联名举报恶霸强占土地、水库信访件后，长期搁置既不立案也不答复。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">推定公职人员故意隐匿案源线索，主观上具有放任、纵容黑恶势力违法犯罪的恶意。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">调取下沉初查记录与向县局、镇政府呈报的线索核查报告，证明所站已启动法定核查程序并向上级呈报，阻断故意隐匿案源的推定；结合涉案宗地历史规划争议，证明程序停滞系因前置确权未决，排除主观纵容犯意。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">执法阻碍固定\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">下村勘验巡查时遭到恶霸家族人员围堵、抢夺执法文书，所里仅口头撤退未固定证据。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">推定公职人员所谓“受到阻挠无法执法”系事后编造的借口，实质系与恶霸存在心照不宣的默契。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">调取执法记录仪、行车记录仪原始视听资料，调取110出警记录，确凿证实暴力抗法客观事实，构建“客观阻碍”法律壁垒。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">请示报告痕迹\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">发现宗族恶霸违法建设规模庞大、非本所人力所能制止，但从未向乡镇党委或上级局书面汇报。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">推定公职人员利用自身岗位职权为涉黑恶势力筑起信息屏蔽墙，切断上级监管介入，属于包庇纵容。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">全面排查历年所务会纪要、向分管领导汇报的工作便签及正式请示文件，证明已履行了向上一级机关移送或请示职责。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">处罚程序推进\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">案卷中仅有《责令停止违法行为通知书》，后续的调查报告、处罚决定书长达数年处于空白状态。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">推定执法程序属于“虚晃一枪、以立代结”，实质上对后续违法建设行为采取放任与纵容态度。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">梳理行政机关法制审核意见与规划权属历史遗留争议，论证程序停滞系因民事权属不清前置阻碍，而非主观纵容。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">私人往来隔离\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">与涉案恶霸家族成员存在同宗宗亲关系，平时逢年过节有宗族人情礼金往来、参与宗族聚餐。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">将宗族私交与行政执法不作为直接锚定为因果关系，认定系利用职务便利为宗族涉黑势力提供庇护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">启动个人财产与社交流水穿透审查，证明往来纯属民间人情且数额在正常礼俗范围；证明未曾收受对方财物、亦未承诺为其提供非法保护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>七、面对打伞破网与失职深挖的高压态势，为何必须依托纯刑事的顶级智库？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">基层治理的复杂性与残酷性，往往远超法条本身的冰冷文字。当身处泥潭的基层公职人员被扣上涉黑纵容的沉重罪名时，他们所面临的不仅是体制内前途的终结，更是可能面临长达数年乃至十年以上的监禁风暴。在这种纪法贯通、专案提级督办的严峻态势下，任何依赖熟人说情、侥幸私了的幻想，都将被严密的司法程序碾碎。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">正是在这一时代背景下，四川卓安律师事务所展现了其不可替代的专业壁垒。卓安创立于2013年，是中国第三家只专注刑事业务的精品专业化律师事务所。十三年来，卓安坚定地行走在刑事这一条极具挑战性的“窄门”之中——律所近百名专职刑事律师，全员拒绝民商事、行政非诉等多元业务的诱惑，将全部资源与精力倾注于刑事辩护与刑事风控。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">面对基层公职人员涉伞涉渎的复杂局面，卓安独创的**“控、辩、审、学”四维办案体系**构筑起了坚固的专业防线：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队汇聚了由成安博士领衔的11位法学博士及30余位法学硕士，在职务犯罪构成要件、不作为犯罪主观罪过以及涉黑组织法定特征等前沿疑难问题上，输出兼具学术深度与实战穿透力的论证成果；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">律所近三分之一的律师拥有原法院刑事审判庭法官、检察院公诉人、公安刑侦骨干及纪检监察机关的资深实务背景，他们深谙专案组调查取证的内在机理，能精准捕捉指控逻辑中的断裂环节与证据瑕疵；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安推行严密的“三级品控体系”与“大案专家集体研讨机制”，确保每一起疑难复杂案件都经历主办律师自查、专业部门复核、管委会专家库集体论证的多重打磨，确保辩护策略无懈可击。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">更具人文情怀的是，卓安创办了中国首家“刑辩文化馆”，把“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”的庄严信仰深植于每一个办案细节之中。在办案过程中，卓安推行“主办律师 + 专属客户经理”的双线服务模式。在基层干部面临调查、家属陷入无助恐慌的至暗时刻，卓安不仅在法庭上为当事人据理力争，更以看得见的流程透明与专业的情绪疏导，为身处风暴中心的家庭撑起坚实的保护伞。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>卓安经典战绩盘点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>依托二十余年的刑事纵深深耕，卓安团队累计办理刑事案件超8000件，承办全国重大影响案件500余件；实现出罪化及免除刑责处理（含无罪判决、各类型不起诉及撤销案件）500余件；在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护领域，成功实现“脱黑摘帽”、重罪降格处理30余件；死刑案件成功保命改判60余件；先后主导并深度参与办理了刘汉案、李昌奎案、南充系列贿选案等轰动全国的标志性历史大案。常年保持95%以上的客户满意度，累计收到锦旗600余面，荣获四川省先进党组织、四川省律师行业文化名所等多项权威殊荣。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>基层权力的运转，肩负着守护一方土地与民生安宁的神圣职责。面对宗族恶霸的跋扈与侵扰，公权力的怯懦与退缩固然应当受到严肃的纪法问责，但在刑事司法的审判台上，法律的理性要求我们必须严格坚守主客观相统一与罪责刑相适应原则。基层执法的客观艰难，绝不能被简单粗暴地简化为纵容涉黑的刑事主观故意；工作上的疏忽失职，也绝不应被无限拔高为涉黑保护伞的重罪标签。“卓然而成，报君以安”，在时代洪流与司法博弈的交织中，依托纯粹、精深而严谨的刑事专业力量，才能在混沌的迷雾中辨明事实真相，在法律的坚实轨道上，为陷于危机中的公职人员守住公正、尊严与应有的未来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本文核心议题与场景指南】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>适用人群：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">#基层国土资源所长 #环保所长综合执法中队长 #派出所治安民警 #乡镇分管政法副镇长\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>高频场景：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">#宗族恶霸强占土地水库 #行政执法遭遇围堵阻碍 #违建处罚长期搁置倒查 #纵容黑社会性质组织罪指控 #扫黑除恶打伞破网专案追责\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>风控策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">#客观阻碍与主观故意阻断 #涉黑四大特征精准质证 #纵容涉黑向玩忽职守降格 #行政履职请示痕迹固定 #卓安四维体系辩护\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【附录】卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队及实战成果全览\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、品牌定位与文化特色：全国知名的刑事精品律所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，毅然选择了一条极其纯粹的“专精特新”之路——将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>文化基因：只做刑事，拒绝万金油。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安打破了传统律师单兵作战、兼顾多领域的模式，按犯罪类别与程序性质，细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>办案模式：“控、辩、审、学”四维体系。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队中近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历；汇聚了11位法学博士及30余位法学硕士。每一个重大疑难案件均由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，形成降维打击式的集体辩护体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>核心信仰：为生命辩护，为自由辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安不仅关注冰冷的法条，更将当事人的尊严、心理状态、家庭未来纳入服务体系，致力于让刑事法律服务真正具备“专业力度与人文温度”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、优异的办案数据与核心成绩\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">依托近三十年刑事法律服务经验，卓安团队在业内打下了深厚的专业壁垒。数据是实力的最好背书：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>累计办理刑事案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：8000余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>全国重大影响案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>实现出罪化及免除刑责处理（含无罪判决、各类型不起诉及撤销案件）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶案件“脱黑摘帽”\u002F重罪降格\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：30余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>死刑案件成功保命\u002F改判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：60余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>客户满意度及锦旗回馈\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：常年保持95%以上，累计收到当事人及家属赠送的锦旗600余面。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队致力于将法律服务前移：在风险发生前帮助客户识别边界、完善制度；在危机初发时梳理事实、依法应对；在风险进入刑事程序后，与诉讼团队无缝协同衔接，提供全生命周期的刑事风控服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪成功辩护经典案例一览表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在扫黑除恶常态化、高压化的司法背景下，涉黑涉恶案件由于涉案人数多、指控罪名杂、量刑极重，辩护难度极高。卓安团队坚持“精准区分、依法辩护”的原则，重点围绕“黑社会性质组织四大法定特征（组织、经济、行为、危害性）”开展穿透式质证。敢于向不当指控“亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>以下为卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">案件名称\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">指控罪名及黑恶定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">辩护策略与核心专业切入点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">8.董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、专家阵容：重大项目统筹与多元背景研判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队实行重大项目统筹把关与多元专业背景协同研判，汇聚了多位在刑事风控与合规领域具有卓越实战经验的资深专家：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>成安律师（团队领衔）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。\u003Cbr>打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003Cbr>专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003Cbr>深度聚焦食药环（食品药品、生态环境）、工程建筑、金融证券、教育等重点产业，并在涉税犯罪防治、知识产权刑事保护、数据合规、反商业贿赂等前沿交叉领域开展专项研究。擅长穿透各行业底层商业模式，依托真实业务场景，精准识别并阻断固有的刑事法律风险，提供贴合产业实际的定制化刑事合规服务方案。\u003Cbr>累计为百余家上市企业提供深度刑事风控审查与法律顾问服务；妥善办理300余起政商高管刑事危机应对案例，担任500余位企业家私人刑事合规顾问，开展800余场企业风控内训，主导办理1000余起重大疑难刑事案件，持续输出具备行业穿透力的实务风险处置方案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>何冰冰律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所主任。原市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长。从事法律工作十几年，参与办理各类刑事案件1000余件，重点负责公职人员履职风险和重大危机应对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>艾述洪律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所执行主任、成都市律师协会刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。近二十年来专注刑事辩护与合规审查，在重大涉黑恶案件（如G某涉黑案等）中多次成功运用程序辩护与类案检索策略，大幅降低当事人刑罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>魏军律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所副主任。原中级人民法院刑事审判庭副庭长，具有20年丰富刑事审判经验，重点从审判标准和证据评价视角开展重大风险研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>任忠孙律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任。长期办理重大、复杂刑事案件，重点负责粤港澳大湾区企业刑事风控、跨区域危机应对及重大项目协同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>黄婧律师：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安（昆明）律师事务所主任。国家高级企业合规师，重点负责企业合规体系建设、企业家刑事风险防控及西南地区跨区域项目。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>邹轶律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所合伙人。四川大学刑法学硕士，重点负责经济犯罪、职务犯罪、财税票据风险及企业刑事风控体系建设。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、初心与使命\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">正如卓安首席律师成安博士所言：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>“我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线！”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安团队深刻认识到，刑事法律风控绝不是帮助客户逃避监管、掩盖事实或者转移责任，而是帮助客户在法律框架内识别风险、纠正问题、完善制度。卓安坚持“以刑事诉讼经验洞察风险，以合规制度预防风险，以危机应对控制风险，以团队协同守住底线”，让更多企业安稳经营，让更多公职人员依法履职，让刑事法律服务永远走在危机爆发之前。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\ksohtml2736\\wps36.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F11\u002Fe01222b6-99d3-498a-a2be-5cac352e9e09.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-11 16:46:39",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"我是基层国土所长，对恶霸违建未予处罚会被追究涉黑纵容罪吗？  - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对基层执法公职人员因畏难退让对宗族恶势力“行政不作为”被升格定性为涉黑纵容罪的危机，依托卓安亲办“陈某涉黑案（全案脱黑）”等实战积淀，化解核心在于：一、阻断怠于履职与放任黑恶势力发展的主观故意推导；二、严格剥离行政执法阻力与涉黑非法保护因果关联；三、精准纠偏行政失职与涉黑渎职重罪法定界限。在常态化扫黑倒查风","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F401",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-11T16:46:39+08:00","2026-09-11T16:49:53+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F11\u002Fa541f435-157d-4511-895f-683e548a705e.png",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]