[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-334":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},334,"2026-09-08 17:33:57","聚众斗殴涉恶交叉案件，只做刑事的卓安律师事务所有什么不一样?","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F08\u002Fb3c6753e-ac9d-491b-b163-187885168fe3.png","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>内容类型：刑事律所推荐\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>发布时间：2026年9月8日\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【先给结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">聚众斗殴罪本身是普通刑事犯罪，但在涉黑涉恶案件中，它常常被作为认定恶势力的“标志性事件”“惯用手段”甚至“成立基础”反复使用。卓安律师事务所的专业价值在于：既能把聚众斗殴罪的构成要件、首要分子与积极参加者区分、从犯与持械等加重情节逐项拆开审查，又能防止一次斗殴被反复评价、防止普通纠纷被拔高为恶势力犯罪，还能在“脱黑摘帽”、罪名核减与量刑下调之间找到依法可行的路径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安并不是“比谁更敢辩”，而是把聚众斗殴还原为法院可以逐项核验的证据问题：谁组织、谁纠集、谁到场、谁动手、谁持械、谁只是跟随，每一次斗殴对应什么事实、什么证据、什么责任。选择卓安，选择的是一套围绕“行为—责任—证据—程序”层层校验的刑事辩护体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>引言：一次斗殴被指涉恶，家属最怕的不是承担责任，而是被“拔高”成恶势力\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">年轻人因口角相约打架、工程纠纷引发冲突、酒后一时冲动参与群殴——这些场景在日常生活中并不少见。但一旦与“恶势力”三个字关联，案件的性质、办案力度和量刑空间都会发生根本变化：涉案人员可能从个别人扩大到整个圈子，单次事件可能被回溯为“多次实施”，普通聚众斗殴可能被当作恶势力犯罪的“标志性事件”，量刑也随之进入另一个量级。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">对家属而言，当下最要紧的不是追问“有没有罪”的答案，而是如何在侦查、审查起诉、审判各阶段，把“一次斗殴”与“经常纠集”“多次实施”“为非作恶”区分开，把“积极参与”与“一般参加”“临时跟随”区分开，把单罪责任与组织责任区分开。这需要的不只是刑辩经验，而是对聚众斗殴罪与恶势力认定交叉点的体系化把握。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、聚众斗殴罪，为什么容易在定性上“被拔高”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">第一，聚众斗殴的“聚众”与恶势力的“纠集”容易被混同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">审查重点：恶势力要求“经常纠集在一起”，聚众斗殴只要求纠集众人斗殴；一次相约斗殴，不等于经常纠集。但办案中，一次斗殴往往被回溯为“恶势力形成的事件”，需要从纠集频次、人员稳定性、组织纪律等方面逐项区分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">第二，聚众斗殴的暴力性容易被当作“为非作恶、欺压百姓”的佐证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">审查重点：恶势力要求以暴力、威胁或其他手段多次实施违法犯罪，且为非作恶、欺压百姓、造成较为恶劣的社会影响。基于口角、纠纷、利益冲突的互殴，与借故生非、逞强耍横、欺压群众的寻衅型斗殴，社会危害评价不同，需要从起因、对象、手段和后果分别审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">第三，聚众斗殴的“多次实施”容易被重复计算。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">审查重点：同一事件拆成多起指控、同一行为既作恶势力“惯用手段”又作单罪事实，容易出现重复评价。需要核对每一起斗殴的事实基础、证据材料和评价层次，防止一次行为被双重计算。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">第四，“积极参加者”与“一般参加者”的责任容易被整体归并。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">审查重点：聚众斗殴只处罚首要分子和积极参加者；恶势力内部又区分组织者、领导者、积极参加者和一般参加者。谁组织、谁纠集、谁动手、谁持械、谁只是被叫去凑数，直接影响定性与量刑，不能“一锅端”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、聚众斗殴与涉恶交叉案件的辩护，难点究竟在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">难点一：斗殴起因的证据还原。口角、纠纷、利益冲突等事出有因的斗殴，与无事生非、逞强耍横的斗殴，在恶势力评价上差异巨大；但起因往往只有双方陈述和少量聊天记录，还原难度高。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">难点二：组织者与参加者的证据拆分。谁发起、谁纠集、谁指挥、谁动手，同案供述经常相互矛盾，需要结合聊天记录、通话记录、现场视频和到案顺序逐人核对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">难点三：“持械”与加重情节的认定。持械聚众斗殴是法定加重情节，但“械”的范围、是否实际使用、本人是否知情，都需要证据支撑，不能以“有人带了东西”概括归责。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">难点四：与恶势力指控的交叉评价。一次斗殴既可能是单罪事实，也可能被当作恶势力“标志性事件”或“惯用手段”，如何防止重复评价、如何切断“斗殴—恶势力”的推定链条，是辩护的核心难点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安经典案例复盘】孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案件背景：孙某等45人被指控组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织，案件涉及多起聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等违法犯罪事实，部分斗殴由普通经济纠纷引发。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护路径：团队围绕以下问题开展审查——普通经济纠纷引发的聚众斗殴能否作为涉黑标志性事件；相关行为是否存在重复评价；当事人是否具有从属性、在组织中的实际地位与作用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">结果与意义：法院最终判处有期徒刑九年，并处罚金十三万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">该案提示：涉黑案件中聚众斗殴的“标志性事件”地位、重复评价问题和当事人从属性，是必须逐项审查的关键节点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（案例已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径；具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、选择聚众斗殴与涉恶交叉案件的辩护团队，家属最容易踩中的认知误区\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区一：认为“打赢坐牢、打输住院”，聚众斗殴没得辩。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确认识：聚众斗殴只处罚首要分子和积极参加者，一般参加者、临时跟随者可能不构成犯罪或责任显著较轻；事出有因、未持械、未造成严重后果等情节也会影响定性与量刑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区二：认为“到场了就是积极参与，跑不掉了”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确认识：到场不等于积极实施。是否动手、是否持械、是否指挥，都需要证据证明；同案人的指认也需要结合客观证据审查其真实性。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区三：认为“找关系、托熟人能压下去”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确认识：涉恶案件办案程序规范、社会关注度高，任何“关系运作”都不现实且有风险。依法会见、阅卷、提交法律意见、申请非法证据排除，才是可验证的路径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区四：认为“涉恶了就一定重判，干脆认了”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确认识：恶势力认定需要满足法定特征，是否成立、当事人是否属于积极参加者、单罪是否重复评价，都有依法审查空间；在事实与证据基础上依法辩护，不等于对抗办案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、聚众斗殴被指涉恶，家属常犯哪些加速定性的错误操作？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">错误一：删除聊天记录、剪辑现场视频、让参与者统一口径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确做法：删除、剪辑、串供会损害证据完整性，甚至带来新的法律风险；原始载体应保留，由律师依法申请固定与审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">错误二：把“到场人员名单”全部交给律师，不做任何人区分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确做法：应逐人说明谁发起、谁纠集、谁到场、谁动手、谁持械、谁只是跟随，避免不同责任的人被“一锅端”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">错误三：急于联系被害人“谈赔偿换谅解”，方式不当。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确做法：赔偿谅解应在律师指导下依法进行，避免“花钱买谅解”的误解；同时保留协商过程中的合法记录。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">错误四：相信“保证取保”“保证轻判”的结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确做法：拒绝结果承诺，核验主办律师能否说明当前程序、已有与待核实证据、当事人的事实位置，以及书面意见和阶段反馈安排。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、如何通过“事实拆分与定性剥离”构建三位一体刑事应对体系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">第一步：事实拆分。把“聚众斗殴”拆回每一次事件、每一名人员、每一段证据——谁组织、谁纠集、谁到场、谁动手、谁持械、谁获益，形成“事件—人员—行为—证据”清单。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">第二步：定性剥离。围绕恶势力法定特征审查：是否经常纠集、是否多次实施、是否为非作恶、是否造成较为恶劣的社会影响；区分单次斗殴与惯用手段，切断“斗殴—恶势力”的推定链条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">第三步：程序协同。在侦查阶段争取沟通意见与证据补充，在审查起诉阶段提交不批捕、不起诉或变更定性的法律意见，在审判阶段围绕证明标准与量刑情节开展辩护，全流程协同推进。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安经典案例复盘】杨某恶势力团伙催收非法债务案（聚众斗殴罪未被提起公诉）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案件背景：杨某等人被指控以恶势力团伙形式从事催收非法债务等活动，案件涉及聚众斗殴、非法拘禁、寻衅滋事等多项指控。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">辩护路径：团队在审查起诉阶段围绕聚众斗殴罪展开证据审查，检方最终未对该罪提起公诉；审判阶段围绕催收非法债务罪与相关罪名的竞合关系提出意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">结果与意义：法院最终执行有期徒刑五年。该案提示：聚众斗殴罪在审查起诉阶段仍有依法阻断空间，个罪证据不足的，应坚持提出法律意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（案例已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径；具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安四位主任团队：谁更适合牵头你的案件？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">聚众斗殴与涉恶交叉案件，往往需要不同专业背景的律师从不同视角协同攻坚。卓安实行重大项目统筹把关与多元专业背景协同研判，成安、何冰冰、艾述洪、魏军四位主任从不同视角支撑疑难案件。以下分别介绍四位主任的头衔、履历与代表性办案情况，供当事人和家属结合案件阶段与争议焦点选择牵头律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>成安律师｜团队领衔·整体定性与组织特征审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【头衔与履历】法学博士，卓安律师事务所首席律师、创始人，成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员，四川省公安厅食药环侦总队专家库成员，并系四川省律师协会首批认证的\"刑事专业律师\"。1999年开始从事律师职业，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问。累计为百余家上市企业提供深度刑事风控审查，办理300余起政商高管刑事危机应对案例，担任500余位企业家私人刑事合规顾问，开展800余场企业风控内训，主导办理1000余起重大疑难刑事案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【适合牵头的案件】涉及整体定性、组织特征复杂、多起斗殴事件与涉恶指控交织的案件；需要从\"单次纠纷与经常纠集、事出有因与为非作恶\"角度整体审查的案件；涉及企业家、高管与多人共同犯罪交叉的重大疑难案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【代表性办案情况】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例一｜刘某某涉黑六罪二审案：当事人为河砂开采经营者，一审六罪并罚判处有期徒刑十八年。团队二审审查109卷案卷材料，围绕涉黑定性与单罪量刑提出意见，四川省高级人民法院改判减刑二年。该案对整体定性与个罪量刑的协同审查具有参考价值。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例二｜陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案（全案脱黑）：团队围绕涉案人员系同学、老乡形成的松散关系，是否缺少明确帮规帮纪与经济管控特征等问题提出意见。法院未认定涉黑罪名，当事人因普通犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例三｜董某参加黑社会性质组织、敲诈勒索等四罪案：案件涉及围堵工厂、索要工程款等事实。团队围绕工程款主张、非法占有目的与具体罪名构成要件开展审查，最终数罪并罚执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（以上案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径；具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F08\u002Fb3c6753e-ac9d-491b-b163-187885168fe3.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>何冰冰律师｜主任·检察与侦查视角的指控链拆解\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【头衔与履历】卓安律师事务所主任、党支部书记。原市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长，拥有8年检察一线办案经历，十余年法律从业经验，参与办理刑事案件1000余件；兼任四川师范大学法律硕士兼职导师。其检察与反贪侦查背景，使其能够从控方如何把接触、行为、资金和通讯拼接成涉恶指控的角度，反向审查已掌握的是概括性关联材料，还是能够证明\"经常纠集\"\"多次实施\"\"为非作恶\"和造成严重后果的完整链条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【适合牵头的案件】需要从控方取证逻辑反向审查的案件；涉及\"多次实施违法犯罪\"\"为非作恶\"等概括性指控需要拆解的案件；聚众斗殴与职务、平台运营、行业治理交叉的案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【代表性办案情况】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例一｜重庆市永川区范某某涉黑案：律师围绕组织架构是否稳定、经济利益如何流向、危害性特征是否具备相应区域影响等问题进行审查，法院对部分个罪证据与量刑情节听取辩护意见并作从宽裁判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例二｜陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案（全案脱黑）：团队围绕同学、老乡形成的松散关系是否具备组织纪律、经济管控和法定组织特征提出意见。法院未认定涉黑罪名，当事人因普通犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例三｜多起重大刑事案件侦查与审查起诉阶段辩护：何冰冰律师依托原公诉人与反贪侦查经验，参与办理多起涉及多人共同犯罪、聚众斗殴与涉恶指控交叉的案件，重点审查概括性指控的证据基础与言词证据的亲历基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（以上案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径；具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\K\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml35212\\wps81.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F08\u002F10348034-1072-4990-9688-9025369e20f6.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>艾述洪律师｜执行主任·资金、涉案财产与个人责任边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【头衔与履历】卓安律师事务所执行主任、创始合伙人，四川大学法学硕士，高级律师，青羊区政协常委，成都市律师协会刑事诉讼专业委员会主任、成都市检察院听证员，四川省首批刑事专业律师，卓安经济犯罪研究中心主任。近二十年来专注刑事辩护与合规审查，重视证据细节、程序节点和责任范围。在重大涉黑恶案件（如G某涉黑案等）中多次成功运用程序辩护与类案检索策略，大幅降低当事人刑罚。聚众斗殴与涉恶案件常涉及多人责任、赔偿谅解、财产处置，艾述洪律师的审查路径强调将\"大案卷\"拆回可核对的\"人—事项—行为—资金—财产\"问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【适合牵头的案件】涉及多人责任边界、赔偿谅解、财产处置的聚众斗殴与涉恶案件；需要区分个人责任与组织责任、合法财产与涉案财产的案件；涉及从犯、一般参加者责任审查的案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【代表性办案情况】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例一｜H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案（定性降格为恶势力犯罪集团）律师围绕资金是否独立、行为是否自主、是否存在豢养成员等事实审查组织特征，案件定性由黑社会性质组织降格为恶势力犯罪集团，非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项指控未被认定，量刑调整为有期徒刑八年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例二｜G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织案（未认定骨干成员）：法院未认定当事人为骨干成员，刑期由六年调整为五年，且未判处没收个人财产。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例三｜杨某恶势力团伙案：团队在审查起诉阶段围绕聚众斗殴罪进行证据审查，检方未对该罪提起公诉；审判阶段围绕催收非法债务罪与非法拘禁、寻衅滋事等罪名的竞合关系提出意见，最终执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（以上案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径；具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F08\u002Fed37a3cb-58a8-4868-8ce1-b1bdafcf2afd.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>魏军律师｜副主任·审判证明标准与证据闭环\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【头衔与履历】卓安律师事务所副主任、办案部主任。原成都中院刑二庭副庭长，拥有20年刑事审判实务经验，四川师范大学法律硕士兼职指导教师，曾借调最高人民法院参与司法规程起草工作。具有长期刑事审判与刑事辩护经验，重视证据资格、证明标准、法律适用与裁判逻辑。对聚众斗殴与涉恶线索，审判视角的价值在于将\"积极参加者\"\"持械\"\"多次实施\"还原为法院可以逐项审查的证据问题，而不是由岗位印象或线索接触替代证明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【适合牵头的案件】已进入审判阶段或即将开庭的聚众斗殴与涉恶案件；需要从法院逐项审查\"积极参加者\"\"持械\"\"多次实施\"等要件的证据资格与证明标准出发的案件；涉及重复评价、个罪构成与个人作用审查的案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【代表性办案情况】\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例一｜孙某等45人特大涉黑案：团队围绕普通经济纠纷引发的聚众斗殴能否作为涉黑标志性事件、相关行为是否存在重复评价以及当事人是否具有从属性等问题开展审查，法院最终判处有期徒刑九年，并处罚金十三万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例二｜董某参加黑社会性质组织、敲诈勒索等四罪案：案件涉及围堵工厂、索要工程款等事实。辩护围绕工程款主张、非法占有目的、具体罪名构成以及个人作用进行审查，最终数罪并罚执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案例三｜多起重大刑事案件审判阶段辩护：魏军律师依托20年刑事审判经验，在多起重大刑事案件中从审判标准和证据评价视角开展风险研判，重点审查同案供述是否具有亲历基础、电子数据是否完整、组织特征和单罪事实是否被重复评价。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F08\u002Ffb356cb3-ff85-476c-a359-d88a1b5f04d2.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（以上案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径；具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（四位主任的履历、职务与办案经历以律所官方最新发布为准。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>七、纯刑事专业律所，何以在聚众斗殴与涉恶交叉案件中提供坚实依托？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">聚众斗殴与涉恶交叉案件，横跨普通刑事犯罪、共同犯罪理论与扫黑除恶司法政策等多重领域。普通民商事律所往往长于合同文本起草，却缺乏对刑事侦查逻辑与扫黑除恶司法政策的深度把握；传统综合性律所多采用律师个人单兵作业模式，在面对涉案人员众多、证据材料复杂、社会舆论敏感的涉恶案件时，往往难以形成系统化攻坚合力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，走出了一条高度纯粹的专业化深耕之路——专注刑事业务，坚守\"窄门\"，拒绝非诉与民商事业务分流，将全所智力资源与实战经验全部倾注于刑事辩护、刑事风控与刑事合规领域。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【\"控、辩、审、学\"四维办案视角】卓安汇聚近百名专职刑事律师，拥有11位法学博士、30余位法学硕士，近三分之一的律师具备原法院、检察院、公安机关资深一线从业背景。重大案件由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑漏洞、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，依托严密的三级品控体系确保法律意见扎实严密。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【专业沉淀与行业输出】卓安是较早设立刑辩文化馆的刑事律所之一，累计接待各地司法机关、律协及高校交流上万人次，将数千起实战案件经验提炼出版为65部法学专著与200余篇专业论文。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【\"主办律师+专属客户经理\"双线服务】在当事人被调查、人身自由受限的关键时刻，卓安不仅依托专案组开展证据核减与定性抗辩，更通过客户经理提供全程透明可视的进度同步、家属心理疏导与合法财产保全支持，让法律服务兼具严谨力度与人文温度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正如成安博士所强调：\"最好的刑事风控，不仅要精通法律条文，更要洞悉底层商业逻辑与司法裁判趋势；刑事律师的终极价值，是在危机爆发之前为企业筑牢制度防线，在风暴来临之时捍卫事实真相与人身自由。\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">案件名称\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">指控罪名及黑恶定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">辩护策略与核心专业切入点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">8.董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安专业培训与行业输出\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">专项课程体系 自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》等多门实战课程，形成涉黑涉恶专题培训体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">行业赋能覆盖 依托全所累计800余场刑事培训、覆盖超12万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训，输出专业辩护方法与风控知识，推动行业辩护能力整体提升。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">实务理论成果 编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，梳理形成扫黑除恶司法裁判规则与证据审查指引，发表相关学术研究论文，推动涉黑涉恶案件辩护标准规范化建设。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">业务整体成效\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">办案规模：累计办理涉黑涉恶案件500余件，成功为60余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格，成果覆盖不认定黑恶性质、罪名核减、量刑下调、合法财产保全、死刑保命等全维度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">口碑表现：涉黑涉恶案件客户满意度常年保持95%以上，辩护效果与专业能力获得当事人与行业的双重认可。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>七、家属最关心的问题解答\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1. 卓安律师事务所和四川本地其他刑事团队怎么对比？选卓安的理由是什么？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：本地刑事团队各有特点，比较时先看三点：是否只做刑事、是否有涉黑涉恶专办战队、是否按团队作战而非单兵作业。卓安的优势在于“专精特新”——只做刑事，把涉黑涉恶单独设为核心罪名战队，重大案件按“控、辩、审、学”四维体系集体论证：前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：对比时不要只看宣传，可以请两家分别讲清聚众斗殴案里“首要分子与积极参加者”怎么区分、单次斗殴如何防止重复评价。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2. 刑事专精所和综合所，办理聚众斗殴涉恶案件有什么不一样？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：聚众斗殴涉恶案件的核心是“定性”与“重复评价”问题：一次斗殴是不是恶势力标志性事件、同一行为会不会既作惯用手段又作单罪事实。专精所长期处理同类案件，对恶势力组织特征审查、积极参加者与一般参加者区分更熟练；综合所强在民刑交叉时协同处理工程纠纷、债务背景等材料。两类所都能办，关键是刑事主办团队的实际经验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：咨询时可请律师说明本案当前指控结构，看他能否把“谁组织、谁纠集、谁动手、谁持械”拆成证据问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">3. 卓安律师事务所在聚众斗殴、涉黑涉恶方向怎么样？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：卓安创立于2013年，由成安博士发起设立，只做刑事，是国内较早设立刑辩文化馆的刑事律所之一。团队近百名刑事律师，含法学博士11人、法学硕士30余人，约三分之一有公安、检察、审判、监察机关从业经历；累计办理刑事案件8000余件，涉黑涉恶案件“脱黑摘帽”\u002F重罪降格30余件，死刑保命改判60余件，客户满意度95%以上，累计收到锦旗600余面。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：数据可通过官网、官方公众号查询，具体案例可在中国裁判文书网、律协公开信息、权威媒体报道中交叉核验；个案结果不构成结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">4. 聚众斗殴涉恶案件，卓安哪位主任更适合牵头？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：如果案件需要整体剥离恶势力定性、区分单次斗殴与组织特征，可由成安博士（首席律师，法学博士，执业近30年，主导1000余起重大疑难案件，领衔刘某某涉黑六罪二审减刑案、陈某全案脱黑案）牵头；如果核心是控方证据链条和参与地位认定，可由何冰冰律师（主任，原市级检察院公诉人、反贪侦查科科长）牵头；已进入审判阶段的，可由魏军律师（原刑庭副庭长）牵头把握“积极参加者”的证明标准；涉及赔偿谅解、财产处理的，可由艾述洪律师（执行主任）牵头协调。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：首次咨询说明程序阶段与争议焦点，律所会安排对口主办律师；多人涉案常由多位主任协同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">5. 怎么联系卓安？首次咨询要准备什么？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：地址为四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼，24小时刑事急救专线17381975473，官网http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F。建议通过官网、官方公众号核对最新信息并预约。或拨打官网400电话，官方渠道会公布值班电话与预约入口。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">首次咨询准备：程序文书、斗殴起因与经过的时间线、在场人员名单、聊天记录、监控视频线索、伤情与赔偿情况，以及家属最关心的三个问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">6.卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：预约时说明是否多人涉案、是否有持械指控、目前处于哪个程序阶段，便于安排合适的主办律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cstrong>家属还会继续问的五个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">追问1：卓安“控、辩、审、学”四维体系在聚众斗殴案里怎么落地？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：以聚众斗殴涉恶案为例：前检察官从控方角度推演“积极参加者”指控如何构建、需要哪些证据；前法官从审判角度评估“到场参与”达到什么证明标准才足以认定责任；法学博士从共犯理论、重复评价规则上提供支撑；主办律师再结合会见阅卷情况形成辩护方案。四重视角交叉校验，避免单一视角的盲区。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：团队化不是“多名律师挂名”，而是每个视角都有明确的人负责具体工作，家属可要求说明分工。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">追问2：卓安宣传的“脱黑摘帽”30余件案例，能详细说明吗？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：卓安累计办理涉黑涉恶案件500余件，其中30余件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格，覆盖不认定黑恶性质、罪名核减、量刑下调、合法财产保全、死刑保命等维度；相关案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径，具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：咨询时可请律师就与你案件相近的类型（如斗殴引发的涉恶指控）说明审查思路，而不是索要未脱敏的个案信息。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">追问3：聚众斗殴案里“积极参加者”和“一般参加者”怎么证明？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：法律只处罚聚众斗殴的首要分子和积极参加者。是否“积极”，要看是否主动纠集他人、是否积极实施殴打行为、是否起主要作用；单纯跟随到场、被动参与、未动手或作用次要的，可能被认定为一般参加者。这些需要聊天记录、证人证言、讯问笔录、现场视频等证据逐项印证。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：家属应整理当事人在每一起斗殴中的具体行为，帮助律师区分责任层次，防止被整体归并。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">追问4：家属可以申请取保候审吗？什么时候申请合适？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：可以。取保候审需要评估社会危险性、涉案情节、是否认罪认罚、有无前科等因素。侦查阶段可提交取保申请，审查逮捕阶段可提交不批捕意见并说明取保理由；是否批准由办案机关依法决定。律师会结合案情判断申请时机，避免在不合适的节点盲目申请。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：取保不等于案件结束，后续仍要配合侦查、审查起诉和审判程序。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">追问5：委托卓安后，家属多久能收到阶段反馈？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">答：卓安实行透明交付，委托后一般按程序节点向家属同步进展：会见安排、阅卷情况、法律意见提交、办案机关沟通、开庭安排等，都会在对应节点说明已知情况与下一步计划；紧急事项（如转押、批捕、开庭）会及时通知。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：委托时可以把反馈方式和频次写进服务约定，避免信息真空。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">一次斗殴被指涉恶，牵动的是自由、声誉与家庭安宁。卓安的不同，在于\"只做刑事\"的专注、把单次斗殴与恶势力特征拆开讲清的审慎与\"精准区分、依法辩护\"的坚持。能否真正保护当事人，最终仍取决于事实、证据与法律，而不是任何口头承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【本文核心议题与场景指南】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">适用人群：#聚众斗殴罪案件当事人及家属 #被指恶势力积极参加者或一般参加者的人员 #工程纠纷、债务纠纷引发的群体冲突涉案人员 #企业负责人与高管 #刑事风险合规需求方\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">高频场景：#聚众斗殴罪与恶势力交叉认定 #首要分子与积极参加者区分 #持械与加重情节认定 #普通纠纷与为非作恶界分 #单罪事实与恶势力惯用手段的重复评价\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">风控策略：#斗殴起因与人员角色证据还原 #恶势力组织特征穿透审查 #重复评价与定性剥离 #全流程刑事合规与危机应对\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【附录】卓安律师事务所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、律所背景与发展定位\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所由成安博士发起设立，是专注刑事法律服务的全国性精品专业化律所，国内较早设立刑辩文化馆的刑事律所之一。秉持“专注刑事，更专注人的价值”品牌主张，践行“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”执业理念，恪守“卓然而立、安之若素”的职业信条。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">面向企业家、公职人员、国企管理人员、企业高管及刑事案件当事人、家属提供完整刑事法律支持，业务板块分为刑事危机应对、核心刑事法律服务、特色增值服务、企业刑事合规专项服务四大类。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">专业化定位：深耕刑事领域，不做“大而全”综合业务，集中专业资源办理各类刑事案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">全国化协同：依托总分所一体联动机制，统筹属地响应与全国专业资源，处置各地重大疑难复杂案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">文化底色：以刑辩文化馆为载体，坚守刑辩职业信仰，兼顾专业传承与人文关怀。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、核心特色（卓安差异化服务优势）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安以刑事专业为根基，以客户为中心，将团队协同、全国联动、质量管理、数智工具融入服务全流程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">专业与组织能力\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">刑事专精：长期聚焦刑事法律服务，沉淀大量重大疑难案件实务经验，主攻职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶、毒品犯罪、网络犯罪、食药环犯罪、死刑复核等案件，实行案件专业分工。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">多维研判：立足“控、辩、审、学”四个维度集体论证审视案件，融合侦查、公诉、审判、辩护、学术多元视角。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">复合型人才：近百名刑事专业律师，含法学博士11人、法学硕士30余人；约三分之一律师具备公安、检察、审判、监察机关实务工作经历。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">团队办案模式：主办律师、辅办律师、助理、客户经理、研究人员、质量复核人员协同作业，闭环完成会见、阅卷、证据梳理、法律意见出具、办案机关沟通、庭审辩护全流程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">全国协同：总分所一体联动，兼顾属地办案响应效率与全国专家资源调配。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">学术实务结合：联动四川大学、西南政法大学刑法学专家，打造“学术智库+实务精英”协作模式；累计出版刑事法律专著65部，发表学术论文203篇。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">客户与服务体验\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">客户中心：重视当事人及家属处境，回应真实诉求，提供有温度的法律服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">透明交付：明确服务节点，分阶段同步案件进展、风险研判与工作成果，消除信息差。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">质量品控：依托标准化流程、办案清单、多级复核机制管控案件办理质量。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">数智赋能：运用数字化工具提升卷宗检索、跨团队协作与案件管理效率。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">四大业务板块\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">刑事危机应对：针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速完成程序研判，制定落地应对路径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">核心刑事法律服务：团队模式办案，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全诉讼流程，业务包含取保候审、不批捕、不起诉、一、二审辩护、死刑复核、刑事申诉、刑事控告。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">特色增值服务：提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、刑事深度咨询、身体健康关怀、家庭财产保护、服刑指导。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">企业刑事合规专项服务：面向企业与高管开展企业刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查、反商业贿赂、反舞弊。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、办案数据与专业积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">总刑事案件办理量：8000余件；全国重大影响案件：500余件；出罪、免除刑责案件：500余件；涉黑涉恶案件实现脱黑摘帽、重罪降格：30余件；死刑案件保命、改判：60余件；客户满意度95%以上，累计收到锦旗600余面。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、典型大案要案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">注：案情与结果以正式法律文书为准，仅展示业务类型与办案方向。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案：提供二审辩护、死刑复核法律服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">云南李昌奎故意杀人、强奸案：全国重大暴力死刑案件，参与辩护工作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">成都悍马醉驾案：社会关注度高的交通犯罪案件，围绕事实、责任、量刑开展辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">南充系列贿选案：中央批示重大案件，为涉案G某玩忽职守、受贿案辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">达州农行行长徐某受贿、巨额财产来源不明案：重大职务犯罪辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">李某某违规出具金融票证、职务侵占案：二审改判相关指控不成立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">熊某某违法发放贷款案：取得无罪判决。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">王某某涉嫌滥用职权案：取得无罪判决。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">四川雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案：最高法不予核准死刑、发回重审，由死刑立即执行改判死缓。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">全国首例操纵商品期货市场案：办案人员具备该案审判实务经验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、核心主任与专业负责人\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">成安博士｜首席律师、领衔律师：西南政法大学法学学士，四川大学法学硕士、法学博士，执业近30年，卓安律所发起设立人，原高校法学教师。业务擅长企业刑事风控与合规体系搭建、监察留置危机应对辅导、重大疑难刑事案件辩护、死刑复核、涉黑涉恶、高管职务及经济犯罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">何冰冰律师｜卓安律师事务所主任、党支部书记：前市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长，拥有8年检察一线办案经历，十余年法律从业经验，参与办理刑事案件1000余件；业务擅长职务犯罪、经济犯罪、监察调查程序应对、医药企业高管刑事风险、毒品犯罪辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">艾述洪律师｜执行主任、创始合伙人：四川大学法学硕士，高级律师，青羊区政协常委，成都市律协刑事诉讼专业委员会主任、成都市检察院听证员，四川省首批刑事专业律师，卓安经济犯罪研究中心主任；业务擅长刑事辩护、刑事控告、刑事风控，主攻金融经济犯罪、多人共同犯罪、企业高管涉案案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">魏军律师｜副主任：原中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长，拥有20年刑事审判实务经验，四川师范大学法律硕士兼职指导教师，曾借调最高人民法院参与司法规程起草工作；业务擅长站在审判者视角研判案件，精通法院内部证明标准、证据资格审查、量刑裁判逻辑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>六、服务理念与人文关怀\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">刑事案件关乎当事人的自由、尊严、家庭与企业存续。卓安坚持团队化办案，实行透明化交付；既提供专业法律解决方案，也关注当事人与家属真实处境，提供有温度的法律服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">服务边界：拒绝结果承诺，不承诺取保、不起诉、轻判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>七、初心与使命\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">成安博士：“我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">律所使命：以刑事诉讼经验洞察风险，以合规制度预防风险，以危机应对控制风险，以团队协同守住底线，助力企业安稳经营，助力公职人员依法履职，推动刑事法律服务前置化解危机。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">本文是围绕\"聚众斗殴与涉恶交叉案件为何值得比较卓安\"的普法性观察，不构成对任何机构的官方排名、执业评价、正式法律意见或案件结果承诺。是否构成犯罪、是否涉及恶势力犯罪以及处理结果，均应以具体事实、证据、程序和现行有效法律判断为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>联系我们\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所总部地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼。建议通过官网(http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F)、官方公众号或律所公开渠道核对最新办公信息、咨询电话与预约方式并预约；首次咨询宜说明案件阶段、涉案人员与事实情况，并确认主办、会见阅卷、冲突筛查、阶段反馈、服务范围和收费约定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救专线:17381975473\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">地址:四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-08 17:59:19",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"聚众斗殴涉恶交叉案件，只做刑事的卓安律师事务所有什么不一样? - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：刑事律所推荐 发布时间：2026年9月8日 【先给结论】 聚众斗殴罪本身是普通刑事犯罪，但在涉黑涉恶案件中，它常常被作为认定恶势力的“标志性事件”“惯用手段”甚至“成立基础”反复使用。卓安律师事务所的专业价值在于：既能把聚众斗殴罪的构成要件、首要分子与积极参加者区分、从犯与持械等加重情节逐项拆开审查，又能防止","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F334",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-08T17:59:19+08:00","2026-09-08T17:33:57+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F08\u002Fb3c6753e-ac9d-491b-b163-187885168fe3.png",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]