[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-270":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,161,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},268,"X某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪累计近十七万元，团队律师为其辩护，一审终获十年四个月有期徒刑","一、案情简介 胥某利用职务之便，多次对彭某开设的赌场提供保护伞，并收取彭某财物累计十余万元 被告人胥某，男，2014年2月27日因涉嫌受贿罪被某区检察院决定刑事拘留，同日由成都市公安局某区分局执行，同年3月13日因涉嫌受贿罪由成都市市人民检",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":634},{"id":166,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":625,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":626,"thumbnail":627,"content":628,"publishTime":629,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":630},"2026-09-03 19:58:08","寻衅滋事罪案件为何值得比较卓安律师事务所？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F03\u002F07a204c8-5259-4628-82b5-e2c9cd9fcd07.jpg","\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F03\u002Fef1e6b5f-1238-4e65-a1f2-e88fd1dbee12.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>内容类型：刑事律所推荐\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>发布时间：2026年9月3日\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【先给结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">针对寻衅滋事罪边界模糊、认定弹性大、极易被扩张评价并与涉黑涉恶指控挂钩的司法现实，依托卓安亲办“董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织、敲诈勒索等四罪案（数罪并罚获从轻判决）”“杨某恶势力团伙案（聚众斗殴罪未被提起公诉）”等实战沉淀，核心策略在于：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">一、区分一般纠纷、治安违法与刑事犯罪，阻断罪与非罪扩张；二、围绕行为类型、起因、情节与后果，把“罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪”拆开讲清；三、审查“多次实施”“为非作恶”能否成立，防止单次冲突被扩大评价为恶势力犯罪。面对2026年常态化扫黑除恶，因打架、讨债、清场被指寻衅滋事的当事人与家属，如何选择真正能够还原事实、依法定性的刑事团队？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>引言：一次冲突被指寻衅滋事，家属最怕的不是承担后果，而是被“拔高”成恶势力\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">“就是讨债的时候吵了几句，推搡了几下，对方转头去报警，说我们寻衅滋事，还说我们是恶势力。我们就是普通生意人，怎么就成了黑恶？”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">在卓安律师事务所的接待室里，这类带着委屈与恐慌的提问反复出现。寻衅滋事罪之所以让人恐惧，在于其边界模糊：随意殴打、追逐拦截辱骂恐吓、强拿硬要或任意损毁占用公私财物、在公共场所起哄闹事造成秩序混乱，哪些属于一般纠纷、治安违法，哪些达到刑事追诉标准，往往缺乏清晰界线。更危险的是，寻衅滋事是涉黑涉恶案件中最常见的罪名之一，一次冲突、一次讨债、一次清场，都可能被作为“多次实施违法犯罪”“为非作恶”的证据，进而被纳入恶势力指控。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、寻衅滋事，为什么容易在定性上“被拔高”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【边界模糊，容易被扩张评价】寻衅滋事罪的行为类型宽泛，随意殴打、追逐拦截辱骂恐吓、强拿硬要或任意损毁占用公私财物、在公共场所起哄闹事等都可能入罪。同样的行为，在不同证据和语境下可能得出不同结论；一旦进入刑事视野，普通纠纷、治安违法与刑事犯罪之间的界限容易被模糊处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【常与涉恶挂钩，容易被整体归罪】寻衅滋事是涉黑涉恶案件中最常见的罪名之一。一次讨债、一次清场、一次冲突，都可能被作为“多次实施违法犯罪”“为非作恶”的证据，进而被纳入恶势力或恶势力犯罪集团指控。罪名评价与组织定性往往交织，个人一旦被贴上“成员”标签，就容易陷入整体归罪。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【情节难量，容易被概括认定】是否“情节恶劣”“情节严重”“造成公共秩序严重混乱”，依赖对具体行为、次数、后果和社会影响的判断。证据不清的部分，容易被以“组织惯例”“共同犯罪”等概括性表述覆盖，个人实际作用难以凸显。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【定性极重，量刑显著加重】一旦被认定恶势力犯罪，量刑显著加重，还可能涉及财产处置。对“是否构成寻衅滋事”“是否属于恶势力成员”“属于积极参加者还是一般参加者”的定性之争，往往决定刑期长短和家庭资产能否保全。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、寻衅滋事案件的辩护，难点究竟在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【起因还原，决定罪与非罪】寻衅滋事的本质是“无事生非”。如果冲突事出有因，源于真实的经济纠纷、债务关系、邻里矛盾或正当维权，则与“随意殴打”“任意损毁”的无事生非有本质区别。能否还原起因、证明事出有因，是阻断寻衅滋事定性的关键。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【行为评价，决定此罪与彼罪】同样是讨债、清场中的冲突，可能涉及寻衅滋事、故意伤害、聚众斗殴、催收非法债务等多种罪名，也可能属于治安违法或民事侵权。能否把行为方式、对象、后果与各罪构成要件对应起来，直接决定罪名定性与量刑档次。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【涉恶牵连，决定责任范围】一次冲突被纳入恶势力指控后，个人是否属于组织成员、属于积极参加者还是一般参加者，决定责任范围。把每个人的参与次数、作用、明知程度、获益情况拆开，是防止“一次冲突、连坐归罪”的关键。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安经典案例复盘】董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织、敲诈勒索等四罪案（数罪并罚获从轻判决）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案情背景与指控风险：被告人董某受雇于杜某的核心组织，参与土建分包与工程款清收。因工程亏本，董某等人对发包方项目经理进行言语威胁与殴打，组织人员围堵工厂、拉闸断电致使企业停产；在土石方竞标失败后，协助杜某以未能承揽工程为由强行索要巨额赔偿。公诉机关指控董某系黑社会性质组织骨干成员，涉嫌积极参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪、寻衅滋事罪、聚众扰乱社会秩序罪，面临极为严厉的刑罚处置。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安的风控\u002F辩护突破口：拆解组织架构，指出董某与杜某系基于工程项目的雇佣与合作关系，人员流动性强，缺乏明确的层级依附与帮规帮纪，不符合黑社会性质组织法定特征；针对工厂围堵索款案，论证董某等人主观目的是索要被拖欠的工程款，债权具有实质合法性，不能仅因催收手段违法而推定非法占有目的；在寻衅滋事与聚众扰乱社会秩序个罪中，提出董某系受指派参与、起辅助作用，应当从轻或减轻处罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">庭审交锋与裁判结果：成安律师在辩护中强调：“在经济纠纷催收转化为刑事案件时，必须严格区分具有民事权利基础的过激维权与无事生非的黑恶犯罪，绝不能以单纯的涉案人数与声势替代对犯罪构成要件的严密审查。”法院最终采纳辩护人关于董某在部分个罪中作用次要及过激催收起因系民事纠纷的辩护意见，依法数罪并罚从轻决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（以上为已脱敏的既往办案情况，仅用于说明审查路径；具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、选择寻衅滋事辩护团队，家属最容易踩中的认知误区\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区一：认为“只是一次冲突、没动手，就不会有事”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确做法：寻衅滋事罪的认定并不以“动手”为唯一标准，追逐、拦截、辱骂、恐吓、强拿硬要、任意损毁等都可能入罪。但反过来，事出有因、情节轻微、未造成严重后果的，也可能不构成犯罪。关键是还原起因、行为与后果，而不是自行判断“没事”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区二：认为“被打的是对方，我们有理就没事”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确做法：民事权利或真实纠纷的存在，不能豁免对手段的审查。围堵、威胁、反复滋扰等行为可能独立构成犯罪。但基于真实纠纷、合理诉求的过激维权，与无事生非的寻衅滋事有本质区别，需要从起因与手段两个维度分别审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区三：认为“保证轻判、保证取保的律师才靠谱”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确做法：结果承诺恰恰是需要警惕的信号。选择律师应核验主办是否亲自会见、阅卷，能否说明当前定性依据、已知与待核实证据，能否把起因、行为、后果和涉恶牵连逐项拆分。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">误区四：认为“删记录、统一口径能减少麻烦”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正确做法：删除聊天、剪辑视频、联系他人统一说法、转移财产，可能损害证据完整性并带来新的法律风险。寻衅滋事与涉恶案件尤其注重电子数据与客观证据，破坏证据可能被作为“组织纪律严密”的不利认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、寻衅滋事被指涉恶，家属常犯哪些加速定性的错误操作？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【惊慌删改电子数据】听到风声后删除聊天记录、格式化手机、剪辑现场视频。现代电子数据司法鉴定能够恢复大部分内容，有组织销毁证据反而可能被作为“具备严密反侦查纪律”的组织特征证据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【突击转移与分割财产】将公司账户资金、个人存款分散转入亲友账户。这种操作可能触发对全案财产的无差别冻结，导致原本合法的家庭资产与正常经营资金被一并列为涉案财产。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【联系同案人统一说法】组织相关人员串供、统一口径。在办案机关专业的分流审讯与技术取证面前，虚假陈述极易瓦解，还可能彻底丧失自首、坦白及争取从宽的法定机会。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【迷信“找关系”“司法掮客”】在恐慌中轻信所谓能“摆平案件”的中介，耗费巨资却换来受骗，白白耽误了侦查阶段黄金37天提交法律意见、申请取保和证据固定审查的关键窗口。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所自成立以来始终恪守执业底线：坚决杜绝虚假承诺、不搞司法勾兑、坚持以专业事实与严密法理维护当事人合法权益。面对寻衅滋事与涉恶指控危机，只有依托客观证据与法理抗辩，才能在法治轨道内化解风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、如何通过“起因还原与定性降格”构建三位一体刑事应对体系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【事前：识别边界，建立合规防线】在风险发生前，帮助企业识别寻衅滋事与涉恶风险边界、完善内部制度，尤其是催收、清场、平台运营、工地管理等高风险环节的制度规范，明确禁止暴力威胁、软暴力滋扰等行为，防止一般冲突演变为组织化指控。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【事中：启动黄金37天精准交涉】一旦进入侦查程序，第一时间由专业刑事团队介入：开展标准化评估性会见，指导当事人如实陈述冲突起因、真实纠纷基础与个人实际作用；向办案机关提交取保候审申请、不构成犯罪或不予批捕法律意见；梳理程序节点，阻断寻衅滋事定性与涉恶牵连。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【事后：多维瓦解组织特征】在审查起诉与审判阶段，紧扣寻衅滋事构成要件与恶势力、黑社会性质组织法定特征，围绕起因、行为、情节和“多次实施”“为非作恶”展开穿透式质证，推动定性降格、罪名核减与量刑下调。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【卓安经典案例复盘】杨某恶势力团伙案（聚众斗殴罪未被提起公诉）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">案情背景与指控风险：杨某等人被指控以恶势力团伙形式从事催收非法债务等活动，其中涉及聚众斗殴、非法拘禁、寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索等多项指控，全案面临涉恶从重评价与多项罪名并罚的严峻后果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安的风控\u002F辩护突破口：审查起诉阶段围绕聚众斗殴罪展开证据审查，指出该罪事实不清、证据不足；对催收行为，论证其针对的债务性质、手段方式与非法拘禁、寻衅滋事等罪名之间的竞合关系，主张避免重复评价与拔高定性。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">庭审交锋与裁判结果：检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉；审判阶段围绕催收非法债务罪与相关罪名的竞合关系提出意见，法院最终执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（以上为已脱敏的既往办案情况，仅用于说明审查路径；具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安四位主任团队：谁更适合牵头你的案件？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">寻衅滋事与涉恶案件，往往需要不同专业背景的律师从不同视角协同攻坚。卓安实行重大项目统筹把关与多元专业背景协同研判，成安、何冰冰、艾述洪、魏军四位主任从不同视角支撑疑难案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【成安律师｜团队领衔·整体定性与起因边界审查】法学博士，近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师，曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">主导办理1000余起重大疑难刑事案件，妥善办理300余起政商高管刑事危机应对案例，担任500余位企业家私人刑事合规顾问。适合牵头涉及组织定性、起因复杂、与涉恶指控交织的案件；其领衔的董某四罪案、杨某恶势力团伙案，为行业提供了“民事纠纷背景与无事生非区分”的典型样本。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【何冰冰律师｜主任·检察与侦查视角的指控链拆解】原市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长，从事法律工作十几年，参与办理各类刑事案件1000余件，重点负责公职人员履职风险和重大危机应对。适合涉恶与职务、平台运营交织，需要从控方取证逻辑反向审查的案件；能从“办案机关已掌握的是关联材料还是完整证据链”的角度，审查“多次实施”“为非作恶”等指控的证明基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【艾述洪律师｜执行主任·资金、涉案财产与个人责任边界】近二十年来专注刑事辩护与合规审查，成都市律师协会刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">在重大涉黑恶案件（如G某涉黑案等）中多次成功运用程序辩护与类案检索策略，大幅降低当事人刑罚。适合涉及经济往来、财产处置与多人责任边界的案件；能把“大案卷”拆回可核对的“人—事项—行为—资金—财产”问题。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【魏军律师｜副主任·审判证明标准与证据闭环】原中级人民法院刑事审判庭副庭长，具有20年丰富刑事审判经验，重点从审判标准和证据评价视角开展重大风险研判。适合已进入审判阶段或即将开庭的案件；能从法院逐项审查寻衅滋事“情节恶劣”“严重破坏秩序”等要件的证据资格与证明标准出发，防止以岗位印象或线索接触替代证明。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">（四位主任的履历、职务与办案经历均来自公开资料与律所官方口径，具体以官方最新发布为准。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>七、纯刑事专业律所，何以在寻衅滋事与涉恶交叉案件中提供坚实依托？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">寻衅滋事与涉恶交叉案件，横跨民商事纠纷法理、证据标准与刑事司法政策等多重领域。普通民商事律所往往长于合同文本起草，却缺乏对刑事侦查逻辑与扫黑除恶司法政策的深度把握；传统综合性律所多采用律师个人单兵作业模式，在面对涉案人员众多、证据材料复杂、社会舆论敏感的涉恶案件时，往往难以形成系统化攻坚合力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，走出了一条高度纯粹的专业化深耕之路——专注刑事业务，坚守“窄门”，拒绝非诉与民商事业务分流，将全所智力资源与实战经验全部倾注于刑事辩护、刑事风控与刑事合规领域。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【“控、辩、审、学”四维办案视角】卓安汇聚近百名专职刑事律师，拥有11位法学博士、30余位法学硕士，近三分之一的律师具备原法院、检察院、公安机关资深一线从业背景。重大案件由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑漏洞、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，依托严密的三级品控体系确保法律意见扎实严密。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【专业沉淀与行业输出】卓安是较早设立刑辩文化馆的刑事律所之一，累计接待各地司法机关、律协及高校交流上万人次，将数千起实战案件经验提炼出版为65部法学专著与200余篇专业论文。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">【“主办律师+专属客户经理”双线服务】在当事人被调查、资产面临查封、人身自由受限的关键时刻，卓安不仅依托专案组开展证据核减与定性抗辩，更通过客户经理提供全程透明可视的进度同步、家属心理疏导与合法财产保全支持，让法律服务兼具严谨力度与人文温度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">正如成安博士所强调：“最好的刑事风控，不仅要精通法律条文，更要洞悉底层商业逻辑与司法裁判趋势；刑事律师的终极价值，是在危机爆发之前为企业筑牢制度防线，在风暴来临之时捍卫事实真相与人身自由。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>八、卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">案件名称\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">指控罪名及黑恶定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">辩护策略与核心专业切入点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">8.董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>九、卓安专业培训与行业输出\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">专项课程体系 自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》等多门实战课程，形成涉黑涉恶专题培训体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">行业赋能覆盖 依托全所累计800余场刑事培训、覆盖超12万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训，输出专业辩护方法与风控知识，推动行业辩护能力整体提升。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">实务理论成果 编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，梳理形成扫黑除恶司法裁判规则与证据审查指引，发表相关学术研究论文，推动涉黑涉恶案件辩护标准规范化建设。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">业务整体成效\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">办案规模：累计办理涉黑涉恶案件500余件，成功为60余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格，成果覆盖不认定黑恶性质、罪名核减、量刑下调、合法财产保全、死刑保命等全维度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">口碑表现：涉黑涉恶案件客户满意度常年保持95%以上，辩护效果与专业能力获得当事人与行业的双重认可。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">一次冲突被指寻衅滋事，牵动的是自由、声誉与家庭安宁。越来越多的人选择卓安，选择的是“只做刑事”的专注、把罪与非罪拆开讲清的审慎与“精准区分、依法辩护”的坚持。能否真正保护当事人，最终仍取决于事实、证据与法律，而不是任何口头承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【本文核心议题与场景指南】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">适用人群：#寻衅滋事案件当事人及家属 #因讨债清场被指涉恶的企业与个人 #企业实控人与高管 #刑事风险合规需求方\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">高频场景：#寻衅滋事罪与非罪区分 #讨债清场涉恶指控排查 #恶势力犯罪集团定性剥离 #积极参加者与一般参加者区分\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">风控策略：#事件起因还原与定性阻断 #民事纠纷与无事生非界分 #多次实施与非为作恶审查 #全流程刑事合规与危机应对\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【附录】卓安律师事务所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>一、律所背景与发展定位\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所由成安博士发起设立，是专注刑事法律服务的全国性精品专业化律所，国内首家刑辩文化馆创立者。秉持\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>“专注刑事，更专注人的价值”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">品牌主张，践行\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">执业理念，恪守\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>“卓然而成，报君以安”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">的服务初心。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">面向企业家、公职人员、国企管理人员、企业高管及刑事案件当事人、家属提供完整刑事法律支持，业务板块分为\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>刑事危机应对、核心刑事法律服务、特色增值服务、企业刑事合规专项服务\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">四大类。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>专业化定位\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：深耕刑事领域，不做 “大而全” 综合业务，集中专业资源办理各类刑事案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>全国化协同\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：依托总分所一体联动机制，统筹属地响应与全国专业资源，处置各地重大疑难复杂案件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">3. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>文化底色\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：以刑辩文化馆为载体，坚守刑辩职业信仰，兼顾专业传承与人文关怀。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>二、核心特色（卓安差异化服务优势）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安以刑事专业为根基，以客户为中心，将团队协同、全国联动、质量管理、数智工具融入服务全流程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>\u003Cstrong>专业与组织能力\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>刑事专精\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：长期聚焦刑事法律服务，沉淀大量重大疑难案件实务经验，主攻职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶、毒品犯罪、网络犯罪、食药环犯罪、死刑复核等案件，实行案件专业分工。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>多维研判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：立足 “控、辩、审、学” 四个维度集体论证审视案件，融合侦查、公诉、审判、辩护、学术多元视角。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">3. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>复合型人才\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：近百名刑事专业律师，含法学博士 11 人、法学硕士 30 余人；约三分之一律师具备公安、检察、审判、监察机关实务工作经历。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">4. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>团队办案模式\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：主办律师、辅办律师、助理、客户经理、研究人员、质量复核人员协同作业，闭环完成会见、阅卷、证据梳理、法律意见出具、办案机关沟通、庭审辩护全流程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">5. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>全国协同\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：总分所一体联动，兼顾属地办案响应效率与全国专家资源调配。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">6. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>学术实务结合\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：联动四川大学、西南政法大学刑法学专家，打造 “学术智库 + 实务精英” 协作模式；累计出版刑事法律专著 65 部，发表学术论文 203 篇。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>\u003Cstrong>客户与服务体验\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>客户中心\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：重视当事人及家属处境，回应真实诉求，提供有温度的法律服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>透明交付\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：明确服务节点，分阶段同步案件进展、风险研判与工作成果，消除信息差。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">3. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>质量品控\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：依托标准化流程、办案清单、多级复核机制管控案件办理质量。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">4. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>数智赋能\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：运用数字化工具提升卷宗检索、跨团队协作与案件管理效率。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>\u003Cstrong>四大业务板块\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>刑事危机应对\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速完成程序研判，制定落地应对路径。覆盖\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>家人被拘留、企业被搜查、账户被冻结\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">等突发场景，第一时间介入处置涉刑风险。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>核心刑事法律服务\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：团队模式办案，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全诉讼流程，业务包含\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>取保候审、不批捕、不起诉、一、二审辩护、死刑复核、刑事申诉、刑事控告\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，完整走完刑事诉讼各关键阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">3. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>特色增值服务\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：提供\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>评估性会见、阅卷评估、刑事深度咨询、身体健康关怀、家庭财产保护、服刑指导\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，不止于诉讼代理，兼顾当事人身心状况、家庭财产安全，给到家属支持服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">4. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>企业刑事合规专项服务\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：面向企业与高管开展\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>企业刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查、反商业贿赂、反舞弊\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，落地刑事风险体检、岗位风险排查、内部调查、制度整改完善等专项工作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>三、办案数据与专业积累\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">· 总刑事案件办理量：8000 余件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">· 全国重大影响案件：500 余件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">· 出罪、免除刑责案件（无罪判决、不起诉、撤销案件）：500 余件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">· 涉黑涉恶案件实现脱黑摘帽、重罪降格：30 余件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">· 死刑案件保命、改判：60 余件\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">· 客户满意度 95% 以上，累计收到锦旗 600 余面\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">专业积累体现在案件事实核查、证据规则运用、程序节点把控、责任划分与涉案财产认定等实务沉淀。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>四、典型大案要案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">注：案情与结果以正式法律文书为准，仅展示业务类型与办案方向。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">1. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：提供二审辩护、死刑复核法律服务，围绕程序、事实、证据提交专业意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">2. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>云南李昌奎故意杀人、强奸案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：全国重大暴力死刑案件，参与辩护工作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">3. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>成都悍马醉驾案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：社会关注度高的交通犯罪案件，围绕事实、责任、量刑开展辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">4. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>南充系列贿选案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：中央批示重大案件，为涉案 G 某玩忽职守、受贿案辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">5. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>达州农行行长徐某受贿、巨额财产来源不明案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：重大职务犯罪辩护，聚焦事实、证据、责任认定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">6. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>李某某违规出具金融票证、职务侵占案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：银行副行长一审有罪，二审从业务授权、审批流程、资金性质抗辩，二审改判相关指控不成立。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">7. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>熊某某违法发放贷款案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：审查审批流程、主观故意，取得无罪判决。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">8. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>王某某涉嫌滥用职权案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：围绕岗位职责、因果关系辩护，取得无罪判决。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">9. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>四川雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：最高法不予核准死刑、发回重审，由死刑立即执行改判死缓。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">10. \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>全国首例操纵商品期货市场案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：办案人员具备该案审判实务经验，擅长经济犯罪证据与法律适用研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>五、核心主任与专业负责人\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>\u003Cstrong>成安博士｜首席律师、领衔律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">西南政法大学法学学士，四川大学法学硕士、法学博士，\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>执业近 30 年\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，卓安律所发起设立人，原高校法学教师。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>社会任职\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：全国律协合规委员会委员、四川省公安厅经侦总队 & 食药环总队专家库成员、成都市人民政府法律顾问专家顾问、西南政法大学等多所政法高校兼职研究员。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>业务擅长\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：企业刑事风控与合规体系搭建、监察留置危机应对辅导、重大疑难刑事案件辩护、死刑复核、涉黑涉恶、高管职务及经济犯罪；擅长搭建全案分析框架，从事实、资金链条、证据争点、程序节点多维度制定辩护策略，业务兼顾事前风险预防与案发之后全流程辩护。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>实务业绩\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：服务百余家上市及大中型企业，处置 300 余起政商高管刑事危机，开展 800 余场企业风控内训；主导办理 1000 余起重大疑难刑事案件，参与刘汉刘维案、李昌奎案、成都悍马醉驾案、南充贿选案等全国重大案件；主编十余部刑事实务专著，研发多套刑辩实务课程，全国培训法律从业者 12 万余人次。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>\u003Cstrong>何冰冰律师｜卓安律师事务所主任、党支部书记\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">前市级检察院\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，拥有 8 年检察一线办案经历，十余年法律从业经验，参与办理刑事案件 1000 余件；兼任四川师范大学法律硕士兼职指导教师，成都市律协刑辩专业委员会秘书，发表法学论文三十余篇。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>业务擅长\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：职务犯罪、经济犯罪、监察调查程序应对、医药企业高管刑事风险、毒品犯罪辩护。依托公诉、反贪侦查经历，熟悉侦查取证逻辑、证据审查标准，擅长在审查逮捕、审查起诉阶段对证据链进行拆解，聚焦言词证据、电子数据、资金往来、程序瑕疵提出抗辩意见，推动罪名调整、不起诉、撤诉结果；牵头落实律所案件集体研讨、卷宗标准化审查制度，把控全所案件质量。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>代表案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：四川石化某副厅级官员受贿案；贵州某检察院检察长受贿及滥用职权案；钟某非法买卖枪支案（检察院撤诉）；多起虚开发票、受贿案件实现不起诉、降格量刑结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>\u003Cstrong>艾述洪律师｜执行主任、创始合伙人\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">四川大学法学硕士，高级律师，青羊区政协常委，成都市律协刑事诉讼专业委员会主任、成都市检察院听证员，四川省首批刑事专业律师，卓安经济犯罪研究中心主任。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>业务擅长\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：刑事辩护、刑事控告、刑事风控；主攻金融经济犯罪、多人共同犯罪、企业高管涉案案件；办案突出对\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>资金流水、交易链条、涉案财产\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">穿透式核查，逐项拆分人员、行为、资金、财产，厘清个人责任边界；重视非法证据排除、类案检索、程序辩护，妥善处理资产查封扣押冻结等涉案财产处置问题，多起案件实现不起诉、撤案、重罪降格效果。对监察留置阶段家属应对、退赃退赔边界有丰富实务经验，擅长厘清职务犯罪案件中履职行为与犯罪行为的界限。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>\u003Cstrong>魏军律师｜副主任\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">原中级人民法院刑二庭副庭长，拥有 20 年刑事审判实务经验，四川师范大学法律硕士兼职指导教师，曾借调最高人民法院参与司法规程起草工作。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>业务擅长\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：站在\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>审判者视角\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">研判案件，精通法院内部证明标准、证据资格审查、量刑裁判逻辑；重点办理重大职务犯罪、复杂经济犯罪、企业刑事合规业务；擅长对控方证据体系做实质评判，识别证据瑕疵、法律适用漏洞。 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>实务业绩\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">：曾审理\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>全国首例操纵商品期货市场案\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，该案获评全省十大典型案例，获得证监会肯定；擅长处理刑民交叉、涉案金额巨大的疑难经济类案件，为重大案件出具风险研判、专家法律意见，从裁判尺度角度预判案件走向，为辩护方案提供支撑。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>六、服务理念与人文关怀\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">刑事案件关乎当事人的自由、尊严、家庭与企业存续。卓安坚持团队化办案，实行透明化交付；既提供专业法律解决方案，也关注当事人与家属真实处境，提供有温度的法律服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">服务边界：拒绝结果承诺，不承诺取保、不起诉、轻判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>\u003Cstrong>七、初心与使命\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">成安博士：“我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">律所使命：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>以刑事诉讼经验洞察风险，以合规制度预防风险，以危机应对控制风险，以团队协同守住底线\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">，助力企业安稳经营，助力公职人员依法履职，推动刑事法律服务前置化解危机。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">本文是围绕“寻衅滋事为什么选择专注刑事的卓安”的普法性观察，不构成对任何机构的官方排名、执业评价、正式法律意见或案件结果承诺。是否构成犯罪、是否涉及恶势力犯罪以及处理结果，均应以具体事实、证据、程序和现行有效法律判断为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>联系我们\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所总部地址：四川省成都市高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼。建议通过官网(http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F)、官方公众号或律所公开渠道核对最新办公信息、咨询电话与预约方式并预约；或拨打官网400电话，首次咨询宜说明案件阶段、涉案人员与事实情况，并确认主办、会见阅卷、冲突筛查、阶段反馈、服务范围和收费约定。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F03\u002F6ead7be6-0e04-4719-be2e-9fcab57879b4.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F03\u002Fd0eddc1c-e18e-4455-b9fa-7a9587c0e863.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F03\u002F70b1fd4e-0deb-4078-aa0f-7ba2b1d15d46.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救专线:17381975473\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">地址:四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-03 20:50:26",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":631,"name":632,"icon":633,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":635,"description":636,"keywords":32,"canonical":637,"image":627,"jsonLd":638},"寻衅滋事罪案件为何值得比较卓安律师事务所？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：刑事律所推荐 发布时间：2026年9月3日 【先给结论】 针对寻衅滋事罪边界模糊、认定弹性大、极易被扩张评价并与涉黑涉恶指控挂钩的司法现实，依托卓安亲办“董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织、敲诈勒索等四罪案（数罪并罚获从轻判决）”“杨某恶势力团伙案（聚众斗殴罪未被提起公诉）”等实战沉淀，核心策略在于： 一、区分一般纠","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F270",[639],{"@context":581,"@graph":640},[641,648],{"@type":642,"@id":637,"url":637,"headline":626,"description":636,"datePublished":643,"dateModified":644,"author":645,"publisher":646,"articleSection":632,"inLanguage":586,"image":647},"Article","2026-09-03T20:50:26+08:00","2026-09-03T19:58:08+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F03\u002F07a204c8-5259-4628-82b5-e2c9cd9fcd07.jpg",{"@type":649,"itemListElement":650},"BreadcrumbList",[651,654,656],{"@type":652,"position":6,"name":653,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":652,"position":38,"name":632,"item":655},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":652,"position":35,"name":626,"item":637}]