[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-260":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,161,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},268,"X某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪累计近十七万元，团队律师为其辩护，一审终获十年四个月有期徒刑","一、案情简介 胥某利用职务之便，多次对彭某开设的赌场提供保护伞，并收取彭某财物累计十余万元 被告人胥某，男，2014年2月27日因涉嫌受贿罪被某区检察院决定刑事拘留，同日由成都市公安局某区分局执行，同年3月13日因涉嫌受贿罪由成都市市人民检",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},260,"2026-09-03 19:58:08","作为乡镇政法委员，为了维稳我雇人截访，怎么会涉嫌涉黑犯罪？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F03\u002F7e904db6-d9cd-4ff0-ae27-faf8458ddabe.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>针对基层拆迁与维稳干部因雇佣社会人员实施暴力截访、涉嫌构成涉恶寻衅滋事共同犯罪的严峻危机，依托卓安亲办‘陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案（成功全案脱黑）’等实战积淀构筑防御屏障。核心策略在于：一、击碎恶势力组织特征，瓦解集团化定性；二、厘清职务履职过当与涉恶犯罪的法定界限；三、阻断首要分子全案罪责推定。在常态化扫黑倒查下，基层干部究竟该如何阻断涉恶重罪定性？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【专业支持】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>本文由\u003C\u002Fspan> \u003Cstrong>成安律师（近30年刑事法律实务经验｜百人级刑事专业律师团队｜刑事风控与合规｜刑事危机应对与化解｜重大疑难刑事案件辩护）\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">提供法律实务支持。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>成安律师简介：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>团队实战经验：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">“镇里重点工程开工，几户钉子户天天去省里上访导致镇考评被扣分。我和镇长实在没办法，私下找了村里的‘治安联防队’（其实是几个有前科的小混混），让他们去上访户家砸门泼油漆把人看住。我们是为了公家维稳，怎么成了涉恶共同犯罪的首要分子？”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">这是多地街道党工委书记、乡镇政法委员、维稳办主任及拆迁办一线负责人在面临纪检监察与公安机关涉黑涉恶专案核查时，经常表现出的震惊与委屈。在基层治理的重压之下，面对重点产业项目落地的时间表与上级关于信访考核“一票否决”的刚性指标，部分公职人员往往会产生一种严重的路径依赖——将体制外游荡的黑灰地痞视为“成本低、见效快、听指挥”的编外治安力量。然而，身处2026年常态化扫黑除恶与基层治理法治化深度交织的司法环境中，这种自以为替公家办事、为了维稳大局的越轨操作，正在直接撕碎公职身份的护身屏障，被司法机关精准锁定为涉恶共同犯罪的组织者与幕后主使。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Ffile:\u002F\u002F\u002FC:\\Users\\K\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\ksohtml5224\\wps9.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、为了基层维稳考核大局，为何雇佣编外人员截访会构成涉恶犯罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">基层治理体系中，重点工程推进与拆迁安置补偿历来是社会矛盾的高发带。当少数被拆迁户因为诉求未获满足而频繁越级上访、甚至以极端方式阻碍施工时，负责维稳与拆迁的基层领导往往面临来自行政考核与项目进度的双重挤压。正规行政程序耗时长、成本高，强制执行又受制于严格的法定司法程序，于是，私下招募社会闲散人员、成立名不副实的所谓“护村队”或“治安联防队”，便成了某些乡镇干部的隐秘捷径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">公职人员原本以为，只要没有发生重伤死亡等恶性流血事件，仅仅采取深夜敲门、泼洒油漆、堵塞锁眼、长期贴身盯防或限制出门等手段，在性质上充其量属于“工作方法简单生硬、引起群众不满”的行政作风瑕疵。但这种自我安慰在刑法评价体系面前不堪一击。在现代司法实务中，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理实施“软暴力”刑事案件若干问题的意见》早已作出明确规制：为谋取不法利益或形成非法影响，对他人进行滋扰、纠缠、聚众造势，足以使他人产生恐惧、恐慌进而形成心理强制，或者足以影响、限制人身自由的，依法属于“软暴力”犯罪手段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">更为关键的是，一旦公职人员与这群有前科劣迹的社会闲散人员之间形成了稳定的委托支配关系——干部负责按月发放“巡逻补贴”、在幕后下达具体的骚扰指令，社会人员则在台前充当打手、多次针对不同上访群众实施软暴力压制，这一架构在公诉机关眼中，便迅速被重构为一个“人员相对固定、首要分子明确、多次在特定区域实施违法犯罪活动”的涉恶犯罪团伙。公职人员不仅无法凭借“为了公家利益”而免责，反而因其在整个行动中起到了动议发起、出资保障、指挥协调的决定性作用，直接被推向了涉恶犯罪集团“首要分子”的毁灭性刑事指控。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队办理的涉黑涉恶及拆迁工程纠纷案件中，因基层粗暴执法异化为涉黑恶重案的教训极为惨痛：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】董某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等四罪案（数罪并罚获从轻判决）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>案情背景与指控风险\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：被告人董某受雇参与土建工程施工与街区拆迁改造。在拆迁与工程竞标过程中，在主犯的指使与带领下，董某多次参与对拆迁户实施踢门砸窗、强行带离、推倒房屋等暴力手段，迫使群众搬离；并因工程款纠纷组织大量人员围堵工厂、拉闸断电致使企业停产，深夜纠集数十人在工地打砸门窗。公诉机关指控其为黑社会性质组织骨干成员，涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪、聚众扰乱社会秩序罪、寻衅滋事罪，面临严厉的数罪并罚长期监禁风险。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. 深度穿透基层拆迁背景剥离黑社会组织特征：卓安律师团队系统调取全案卷宗，向法庭深刻阐明，涉案群体人员关系松散，缺乏法定的帮规戒律与严密人身控制，其暴力拆迁与围堵行为源于具体的工程推进与劳务经济纠纷，不能将拆迁过程中的违法失范行为生搬硬套为黑社会性质组织；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. 厘清职务雇佣与犯罪故意界限：深入核查董某在每起指控中的具体行为表现，证实其系受雇参与施工的从业人员，没有参与部分重点工地的寻衅滋事，在其参与的事件中起次要、辅助作用，依法应当认定为从犯；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">3. 排除非法占有目的阻断重罪加重处罚：针对敲诈勒索指控，律师全面调取真实的工程分包合同与欠款凭证，证实索款具有客观民事基础，并非无中生有的黑恶敲诈。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：成安律师指出：“在拆迁和工程推进中发生的民事与行政过错，绝不能脱离法定的事实证据，被简单化、概念化地拔高为黑恶势力犯罪。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(27, 27, 30); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">合议庭最终充分采纳了卓安律师关于董某在个罪中系从犯、具有法定从轻情节的核心辩护意见，在严惩涉黑的高压态势下作出了最大限度从宽的裁判，依法决定执行有期徒刑十一年，成功避免了更为严苛的重刑结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F03\u002Fbb3cba83-7186-48e5-8972-c8707ad82544.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、公职人员指使社会人员暴力滋扰在刑法上如何定性？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">许多身处风暴眼中的基层干部常常陷入一种认知盲区：“人不是我动手打的，油漆不是我亲手泼的，我只是安排他们‘把人看住、别让出去’，怎么我就成了刑法上的实行犯甚至主犯？”要廓清这一问题，必须站在审判实践的高度，透视我国刑法对共同犯罪与教唆行为的深层评价逻辑：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第一，涉嫌触犯《刑法》第293条寻衅滋事罪与第238条非法拘禁罪。\u003Cbr>公职人员指使社会人员在上访户门前泼油漆、砸门、堵锁眼、张贴恐吓字条，依照《刑法》第293条第1款第（二）项及最高法相关解释，属于“恐吓他人，情节恶劣”；依照第（三）项，属于“任意损毁公私财物”。而强行派人在上访群众家门口日夜看守、围堵大门、强行阻拦其人身自由流动使其无法出门，一旦持续时间达到一定限度，便直接侵害了公民的人身自由法益，完全符合《刑法》第238条非法拘禁罪的构成要件。两罪往往在同一起截访事件中交织并发。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第二，依据《刑法》第25条与第29条，幕后指使者依法承担主犯责任。\u003Cbr>根据我国刑法共同犯罪理论，教唆他人犯罪的，应当按照他在共同犯罪中所起的作用处罚；组织、领导犯罪集团进行犯罪活动的或者在共同犯罪中起主要作用的，是主犯。公职人员虽然没有亲临现场提桶泼漆，但整个犯罪意图是由其发起，资金报酬是由其提供，目标对象是由其指定，行动节奏是由其把控。在刑法因果关系上，前方社会人员的每一次滋扰破坏，都是公职人员犯罪意志的物化延伸。在司法实务中，公诉机关几乎无一例外地将此类公职人员认定为主犯，甚至直接认定为该团伙的“首要分子”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第三，涉嫌触犯《刑法》第397条滥用职权罪，与普通犯罪数罪并罚。\u003Cbr>公职人员负有维护社会稳定、依法行政的法定职责，其职权行使必须严格遵循正当法律程序。动用财政维稳资金或村集体公款雇佣有前科人员充当打手，利用黑灰手段侵害辖区居民的合法权益，造成恶劣的社会舆情与群众信访反弹，属于严重的徇私滥用职权行为。当行为同时构成寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪与滥用职权罪时，根据刑法基本原理及涉黑涉恶相关裁判规则，除牵连犯从一重处的情形外，公诉机关往往倾向于根据具体事实决定数罪并罚，极易导致刑期急剧攀升至数年乃至十年以上。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、基层干部常犯的“公权力工具化与维稳特权错觉”根源何在？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">深入剖析涉案乡镇及街道负责人的心理演进过程，可以清晰地看到，正是以下几种在基层行政中长期滋生的错误观念，为公职人员埋下了毁灭性的刑事祸根：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">其一，错将“行政目的的正当性”等同于“实施手段的合法性”。很多干部在接受纪检监察调查时痛哭流涕，反复强调：“我个人没有装一分钱进腰包，钉子户漫天要价阻碍全镇重大项目施工，我这么做纯粹是为了集体利益、为了镇里的考核排名。”这种“动机论”在现代刑法中根本无法成为免除责任的抗辩事由。任何正当的行政目标，都必须通过合法的法定程序来实现。用反法治、反人权的私刑手段去达成所谓的“维稳目标”，其行为本身就是对国家法治秩序最大的破坏。刑法评价的是客观行为的社会危害性与法定构成要件，绝不会因为行为人打着“为了公家”的旗号，就对其实施的恐吓、拘禁与滋扰网开一面。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">其二，错将“体制外地痞力量”视为“安全好用的救火队”。在一些宗族势力盘踞、矛盾错综复杂的基层乡镇，部分官员误以为法律程序过于繁琐软弱，而社会闲散人员“路子野、脸皮厚、震慑力强”，能够迅速摆平那些让正规干部束手无策的矛盾。这种心态实质上是在玩火自焚。公职人员与社会人员一旦产生金钱与指令的往来，公权力便直接丧失了中立性与权威性，沦为黑灰势力的幕后提线木偶。这群所谓的“联防队员”不仅会在执法过程中肆意加码、实行过限，更会在事发后为了减轻自身罪责，第一时间将全部责任毫无保留地指供到幕后官员身上，使公职人员成为专案组重点打击的“靶心”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">其三，错将“行政级别与组织背景”视为“阻隔涉恶定性的绝缘体”。部分乡镇党委书记或政法委员抱有严重的侥幸心理，自以为涉黑涉恶专属社会底层流氓团伙，自己作为国家正式在编干部、地方领导，怎么也不可能被扣上“恶势力首要分子”的罪名。他们完全忽略了，《反有组织犯罪法》及系列司法解释明确将“黑恶势力向基层政权渗透、公职人员充当黑恶势力组织者与保护伞”列为从严惩处的重点对象。只要公职人员的行为客观上符合经常纠集在一起、有组织地针对群众实施违法犯罪活动的恶势力组织特征，公职身份不仅不是护身符，反而会成为被认定为主观恶性深、政治影响恶劣的酌定从重处罚要件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、面临涉恶线索倒查与监察留置时基层管理人员有哪些加速崩溃的应对误区？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">当上访群众的控告材料引起上级扫黑专班或纪检监察机关的高度重视，调取镇政府资金账目与监控、传唤相关社会人员时，涉案公职人员往往会经历从自信到恐慌的剧烈心理震荡。在这种极度焦虑的状态下，若缺乏专业刑事律师的早期指导，当事人常采取极其错误的自救举措，反而使案情迅速恶化：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第一，私下约见社会人员并突击给付巨额“封口费与安家费”。得知专案组开始外围核查后，部分干部慌不择路，紧急从企业赞助款或账外小金库中支取数十万元现金送给地痞头目，反复要求“一旦被抓，就说所有事都是你们自己看不过去自发干的，千万别咬出镇里”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(27, 27, 30); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">这种操作在现代监察调查面前不仅形同虚设，反而直接涉嫌贪污、挪用公款以及妨害作证等数项新的罪名。更致命的是，私下退款、给封口费的行为，在客观上直接印证了公职人员与黑恶团伙之间存在严密的利益输送与攻守同盟，坐实了公职人员在恶势力犯罪组织中处于发号施令、提供资金支持的核心地位。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第二，指使财政所与维稳办“突击修改账册、伪造治安巡逻合同”。为了掩饰雇佣黑灰势力的事实，部分负责人指使财务人员连夜修改票据凭证，将付给混混的滋扰报酬伪造为“正规保安服务费”或“购买防汛物资发票”，并补签虚假的巡逻劳务合同。在司法会计审计与电子数据鉴定面前，这种低劣的造假手法极易被迅速识破。伪造合同与做假账的行为，不仅直接涉嫌伪造国家机关公文、印章罪或帮助伪造证据罪，更直接排除了当事人原本可能争取的从宽处理政策，彻底关闭了依法自首与认罪认罚的法治通道。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第三，在留置初期出于面子盲目“大包大揽”或“全盘硬抗”。许多基层干部在被监察机关采取留置措施的最初几天，要么心存幻想、全盘否认自己知情，声称“我对联防队的所有行为一无所知”，在确凿的微信指令与通话录音面前瞬间丧失信用；要么走向另一个极端，在心理防线崩溃后自暴自弃，为了所谓的“有担当”，把手下社会人员背地里实施的所有严重打砸、伤害行为全部揽在自己身上，供认“都是我让他们放手去干的”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(27, 27, 30); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Arial;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">这种不顾事实的大包大揽，直接剥离了律师后续主张“实行犯过限”的辩护空间，亲手将自己推上了犯罪集团首要分子的严苛审判席。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">第四，轻信所谓“有门路能协调”的社会能人，掉入司法掮客诈骗陷阱。干部家属在当事人被留置后往往极度慌乱，急于寻找各方关系求情托人，极易被声称“认识省专案组主要领导、能从涉黑专案中将人摘出来”的骗子诈骗数百万巨款。卓安律师事务所始终坚守“绝不司法勾兑、不搞虚假承诺、以极致专业事实辩护赢得合法结果”的服务底线，正是因为深刻洞察到，涉黑涉恶专案属于终身追责的政治红线，任何非法运作只会导致财散人亡，只有依托扎实的事实厘清与法理抗辩，才是行之有效的安全解局路径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、如何从“组织属性、履职过当、共犯限缩”三维度阻断涉恶重罪定性？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">面对公诉机关将基层维稳行动指控为恶势力犯罪集团、将公职人员认定为首要分子的极重危机，专业的刑事辩护力量必须迅速建立坚固的法理防御体系，从组织属性、履职过当、共犯责任三个维度，展开精准的定性阻击与责任切割：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">首先，在组织属性上，必须实施“恶势力法定特征的穿透式瓦解”，阻断集团化定性。\u003Cbr>辩护的首要发力点，是打掉控方关于“恶势力组织”的指控前提。成安律师反复强调：“有组织犯罪的认定必须严格遵照法定构成要件，绝不能将为了特定行政任务临时拼凑的人员纽带，简单推论为具有反社会性质的涉恶犯罪集团。”律师团队必须详尽调取全案证据证明：涉案社会人员之间并不存在长期的、固定的层级领导架构与帮规戒律，彼此之间系临时雇佣的雇员关系；其所谓的资金往来是偶发性的误工报酬，并未形成以黑护商、聚敛非法资产的经济支撑；涉案行为的发生完全依附于特定时期的重点工程信访矛盾，矛盾一旦平息人员即行解散，根本不具备恶势力组织在特定区域内长期称霸一方、为非作恶的法定特征。通过瓦解恶势力组织定性，彻底粉碎公职人员承担犯罪集团首要分子全案责任的指控基础。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">其次，在行为定性上，必须实施“基层履职过当与黑恶犯罪意图的严格剥离”，还原行政属性。\u003Cbr>辩护人必须向合议庭充分论证：涉案干部的核心主观意图，是为了推进地方重点工程施工、化解越级信访考核压力，其出发点属于履行公职过程中的行政工作动机，而非出于欺压群众、寻求社会非法影响力的黑恶犯罪心理。律师团队需要详细梳理涉案期间上级下发的信访考核文件、工程推进督办函以及政府相关会议记录，证实公职人员的行为具有明显的职务行为外壳。对于指使行为的具体内容，必须进行逐字逐句的精细化审查，证明干部当年的指示仅限于“做好现场看护、阻止违规越级上访”，从未发出过伤害人身、故意损毁重大财产的明确授意，坚决反对将特定历史背景下的严重行政越权与粗暴履职，不加区分地刑法化、涉恶化拔高。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">再次，在共犯责任上，必须实施“实行犯过限责任与组织者意志的精准切割”，限缩罪责范围。\u003Cbr>在审查起诉与庭审辩论阶段，专业律师必须严格依据刑法共同犯罪理论中的“实行过限”原理展开强力阻击。公职人员虽然指示了社会人员去“做工作、看住人”，但如果该群人员在现场实施了极其恶劣的砸门、泼油漆、持械恐吓甚至盗窃财物等极端行为，必须有力证明这些恶劣手段完全超出了公职人员的主观预见范围与授意边界，纯属实行犯在现场自作主张的过限行为。依照罪责自负原则，实行过限行为所导致的严重损害结果，应当完全由具体的动手人员独自承担刑事责任，绝不能将其机械地归结为公职人员的指使结果，从而强力将公职人员的罪责限缩在普通滥用职权罪或轻微寻衅滋事从犯的狭窄区间之内。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在卓安团队过往承办的数十起涉黑涉恶成功出罪的标杆战例中，这种从组织源头击碎涉黑恶法定特征的经典判例，极具实务指导价值：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案（成功打掉涉黑罪名，仅获轻刑一年）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>案情背景与指控风险\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：被告人陈某早年跟随其兄从事沙金开采与工程施工。公诉机关指控其为确立行业非法地位，先后纠集多名同学与老乡，在多处区域有组织地实施了多起聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事等违法犯罪活动，并在团伙内部确立了不听指挥将受惩罚的不成文规矩，已演化为称霸一方的黑社会性质组织。陈某被作为组织领导者起诉，面临长期监禁乃至顶格重刑的严重指控。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">1. 切中组织特征缺失实施致命出罪辩护：卓安律师全面阅卷后敏锐指出，涉案群体人员关系松散，完全是基于同学、老乡等传统熟人网络的偶发聚合，缺乏黑社会性质组织所必备的严格层级、帮规家法与严密的人身控制体系，坚决作不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的无罪剥离抗辩；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">2. 深入审查资产属性否定涉黑经济支撑：细致梳理陈某的工程业务账目，证实涉案资金全部源于真实的市场化生产经营，未形成以商养黑、以黑护商的非法资本循环；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">3. 凝聚前公检法专家智慧多维论证：依托卓安独创的“控、辩、审、学”四维研判机制，由前公诉人拆解控方证据链瑕疵，前法官推演裁判心证尺度，法学博士夯实罪刑法定学理支撑，合力形成了不可动摇的抗辩体系。\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：成安律师在法庭上深刻阐述：“司法认定涉黑涉恶组织，必须严守刑法第二百九十四条法定的四个特征，绝不能把民间的松散违规行为或普通团伙违法，简单粗暴地拔高为黑恶性质组织。”法院经审理，全盘采纳了卓安律师的辩护意见，依法判决认定组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪不成立，全案彻底剥离涉黑定性。陈某最终仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，其合法财产全部保全。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>六、基层公职人员涉嫌关联拆迁维稳涉恶案时的刑事风控自查清单是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">面对各级纪检监察专案组与公安扫黑力量的倒查风暴，涉案基层干部及其家属绝不能陷入被动等待的僵局，必须对照以下实务指标，展开全面系统的合规自查与抗辩梳理：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">自查与抗辩维度\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">核心审查靶点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">致命法律风险暴露点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">卓安专业风控与辩护阻击指引\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">组织关系属性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">联防队员身份证明、临时聘用协议、考勤记录、人员前科档案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">被专案组以“纠集刑满释放人员充当打手”为由直接定性为涉恶组织\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">证明队员系临时雇佣协助治安巡逻，无长期层级与帮规，瓦解涉恶犯罪集团的组织架构认定\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">资金支出性质\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">维稳补贴审批单、财政报销凭证、村账明细、个人资金往来\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">财政资金或企业赞助款被认定为用于维系涉恶组织运转的“非法黑金”\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">穿透式梳理资金审批依据，证明系基层治安防范专项公款支出，阻断黑恶势力非法经济特征推定\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">具体指令内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">微信聊天记录、工作例会记录、通话录音、现场指示证人证言\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">指令含糊被控方解释为“默许或指示使用暴力手段对上访户进行打击”\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">锁定公职人员仅发出“文明劝阻、现场看护”等合法指示，证明打砸泼漆系社会人员实行过限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">现场侵害后果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">报警接处警记录、门窗损坏物损评估书、被害人伤情鉴定\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">阻拦群众被定性为非法拘禁，打砸损毁财物被定性为寻衅滋事\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">审查物损鉴定程序合法性与折旧价值，证明未造成实质人身伤害，排除恶势力危害性特征\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">监察程序应对\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">谈话函询自述材料、留置初期讯问笔录、电子通讯数据留存\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">慌乱中与混混串供、给封口费或伪造巡逻合同，直接涉嫌妨害作证罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">严格遵守监察程序客观如实陈述，由资深刑辩律师指导起草规范书面材料，杜绝反侦查过激行为\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>七、深耕基层职务犯罪与涉黑恶交叉领域的专业力量源于何种法治基石？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">当突如其来的涉恶倒查风暴席卷基层体制内干部，面对公职身份的丧失、党纪政纪的严厉处分以及可能面临的高墙囹圄，任何私下的人情托请与单薄的情绪辩白都显得无能为力。能够在这场风暴中厘清权责边界、击碎定性拔高、守护自由与尊严的，只有长期沉浸于刑事司法一线、深谙法理构造与裁判心证的顶尖专业力量。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在全国刑事法律服务版图上，四川卓安律师事务所以一种近乎纯粹的执业定力，在行业内树立了独树一帜的专业标杆。自2013年创立以来，卓安便做出了一个在当时被视作逆势而行的战略抉择——只办刑事案件，绝不涉足任何民事、商事、非诉等万金油业务。十三年如一日的垂直深耕，让卓安在职务犯罪辩护、涉黑涉恶出罪、死刑复核及危机应对领域，构筑了常人难以企及的专业壁垒。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">正因为只做刑事，卓安彻底打破了传统律师单兵作战、粗放应诉的瓶颈，打造了一支由百余名专职刑事律师构成的精锐军团。在这支队伍中，汇聚了11位法学博士以及30余位法学硕士，更有近三分之一的律师拥有原法院刑事审判庭法官、原检察院公诉人及反贪侦查员、原公安经侦刑警的资深从业背景。在卓安独创的“控、辩、审、学”四维办案体系下，每一起涉黑涉恶与职务犯罪交织的重大疑难案件，都会自动触发专家集体研讨机制：前公诉人深度拆解起诉逻辑死穴，前法官精准把控裁判尺度与量刑心证，法学博士夯实罪刑法定的理论根基，资深刑辩律师主导法庭交锋质证。这种全方位、穿透式的多维论证与三级严密品控，使得卓安律师在面对错综复杂的基层维稳卷宗与模糊口供时，能够精准切中要害，从容化解重大危机。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在卓安成都总部，坐落着全国首座“刑辩文化馆”。十余年来，这里接待了数以万计的公检法司法人员、律协同仁、知名企业家与高校学子，成为中国刑事法治文化的重要展示高地。文化馆内镌刻的“为生命辩护，为自由辩护”十个大字，不是一句空洞的宣传语，而是融入每一名卓安律师执业血脉中的庄严誓言。从全国瞩目的刘汉特大涉黑案辩护，到推动死刑适用更加审慎的李昌奎案，再到包括雷某某案在内的数十起死刑复核成功改判死缓的保命范例，卓安累计办理各类刑事案件超8000件、重大职务犯罪案件超600件（涵盖省部级、厅局级大案），为当事人争取到无罪化处理500余件、缓刑700余件，赢得了当事人及家属赠送的600余面锦旗。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">尤为独特的是，面对基层干部面临涉黑恶倒查与留置危机时的巨大心理崩溃，卓安首创了“专职主办律师+专属客户经理”的双线服务模式。律师团队全神贯注攻坚案卷证据与法理抗辩，客户经理则全流程负责向家属同步进展、提供专业的心理疏导与合规生活指导。这种涵盖“深度刑事咨询、评估性会见、评估性阅卷”的标准化服务流程，彻底剔除了行业中不负责任的虚假承诺与司法勾兑，让身处绝境的当事人及家属看得见透明、感受得到司法的力量与温度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">刑事风控的目的，绝非帮助违法违纪者规避法律责任，而是帮助公职人员在法律框架内看清边界、厘清权责；而当危机不幸降临，最高水平的辩护力量，就是用无懈可击的事实、如刀切斧砍般严谨的法理，阻断公权力的过激追诉，守护法治社会公平正义的底线。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">基层治理繁复维艰，但公权力的行使必须永葆对法治的敬畏。为了完成考核指标而将社会闲散人员引入基层维稳与拆迁机制，不仅是对公民合法权益的肆意践踏，更无异于饮鸩止渴，终将引火烧身。在扫黑除恶常态化与打伞破网纵深推进的严峻司法态势下，任何假借公权力之名行黑恶私刑之实的越轨盲动，都必将面临刑事法律的严苛审视。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">当调查的风暴骤起，涉案基层干部切忌在恐慌中盲动失措。只有褪去侥幸与恐惧，依托真正深谙刑事司法内在逻辑与反有组织犯罪前沿的专业智库，以事实为基，以法理为刃，在程序与实体的双重轨道上剥离涉恶定性，阻断共同犯罪责任的扩大化归责，方能在严酷的历史倒查中廓清是非，守住个人的自由、尊严与未来。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【本文核心议题与场景指南】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>适用人群：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">#街道办事处党工委书记 #乡镇政法委员 #基层维稳办主任 #拆迁办一线负责人\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>高频场景：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">#重点工程开工钉子户拔点 #雇佣社会闲散人员参与截访 #对上访户实施喷漆砸门软暴力 #被指控涉恶犯罪集团首要分子 #基层公职人员与混混同案起诉\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>风控策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">#涉恶犯罪集团组织特征穿透式瓦解 #基层粗暴履职与涉恶共同犯罪边界厘定 #打砸泼漆行为实行犯过限抗辩 #公款维稳补贴与涉黑恶非法资金性质甄别 #监察留置初期事实客观梳理与合规程序防御\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>【附录】卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队及实战成果全览\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>一、品牌定位与文化特色：全国知名的刑事精品律所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，毅然选择了一条极其纯粹的“专精特新”之路——将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>文化基因：只做刑事，拒绝万金油。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安打破了传统律师单兵作战、兼顾多领域的模式，按犯罪类别与程序性质，细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>办案模式：“控、辩、审、学”四维体系。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队中近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历；汇聚了11位法学博士及30余位法学硕士。每一个重大疑难案件均由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，形成降维打击式的集体辩护体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>核心信仰：为生命辩护，为自由辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安不仅关注冰冷的法条，更将当事人的尊严、心理状态、家庭未来纳入服务体系，致力于让刑事法律服务真正具备“专业力度与人文温度”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>二、优异的办案数据与核心成绩\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">依托近三十年刑事法律服务经验，卓安团队在业内打下了深厚的专业壁垒。数据是实力的最好背书：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>累计办理刑事案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：8000余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>全国重大影响案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>实现出罪化及免除刑责处理（含无罪判决、各类型不起诉及撤销案件）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：500余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶案件“脱黑摘帽”\u002F重罪降格\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：30余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>死刑案件成功保命\u002F改判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：60余件；\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>客户满意度及锦旗回馈\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：常年保持95%以上，累计收到当事人及家属赠送的锦旗600余面。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队致力于将法律服务前移：在风险发生前帮助客户识别边界、完善制度；在危机初发时梳理事实、依法应对；在风险进入刑事程序后，与诉讼团队无缝协同衔接，提供全生命周期的刑事风控服务。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>三、卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪成功辩护经典案例一览表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">在扫黑除恶常态化、高压化的司法背景下，涉黑涉恶案件由于涉案人数多、指控罪名杂、量刑极重，辩护难度极高。卓安团队坚持“精准区分、依法辩护”的原则，重点围绕“黑社会性质组织四大法定特征（组织、经济、行为、危害性）”开展穿透式质证。敢于向不当指控“亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>以下为卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">案件名称\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">指控罪名及黑恶定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">辩护策略与核心专业切入点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">8.董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"117\">10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"141\">敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"318\">强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"232\">在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\"> \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>四、专家阵容：重大项目统筹与多元背景研判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">团队实行重大项目统筹把关与多元专业背景协同研判，汇聚了多位在刑事风控与合规领域具有卓越实战经验的资深专家：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>成安律师（团队领衔）\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。\u003Cbr>打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003Cbr>专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003Cbr>深度聚焦食药环（食品药品、生态环境）、工程建筑、金融证券、教育等重点产业，并在涉税犯罪防治、知识产权刑事保护、数据合规、反商业贿赂等前沿交叉领域开展专项研究。擅长穿透各行业底层商业模式，依托真实业务场景，精准识别并阻断固有的刑事法律风险，提供贴合产业实际的定制化刑事合规服务方案。\u003Cbr>累计为百余家上市企业提供深度刑事风控审查与法律顾问服务；妥善办理300余起政商高管刑事危机应对案例，担任500余位企业家私人刑事合规顾问，开展800余场企业风控内训，主导办理1000余起重大疑难刑事案件，持续输出具备行业穿透力的实务风险处置方案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>何冰冰律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所主任。原市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长。从事法律工作十几年，参与办理各类刑事案件1000余件，重点负责公职人员履职风险和重大危机应对。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>艾述洪律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所执行主任、成都市律师协会刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。近二十年来专注刑事辩护与合规审查，在重大涉黑恶案件（如G某涉黑案等）中多次成功运用程序辩护与类案检索策略，大幅降低当事人刑罚。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>魏军律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所副主任。原中级人民法院刑事审判庭副庭长，具有20年丰富刑事审判经验，重点从审判标准和证据评价视角开展重大风险研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>任忠孙律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任。长期办理重大、复杂刑事案件，重点负责粤港澳大湾区企业刑事风控、跨区域危机应对及重大项目协同。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>黄婧律师：\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安（昆明）律师事务所主任。国家高级企业合规师，重点负责企业合规体系建设、企业家刑事风险防控及西南地区跨区域项目。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">· \u003Cstrong>邹轶律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">：卓安律师事务所合伙人。四川大学刑法学硕士，重点负责经济犯罪、职务犯罪、财税票据风险及企业刑事风控体系建设。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cstrong>五、初心与使命\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">正如卓安首席律师成安博士所言：\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong>“我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线！”\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">卓安团队深刻认识到，刑事法律风控绝不是帮助客户逃避监管、掩盖事实或者转移责任，而是帮助客户在法律框架内识别风险、纠正问题、完善制度。卓安坚持“以刑事诉讼经验洞察风险，以合规制度预防风险，以危机应对控制风险，以团队协同守住底线”，让更多企业安稳经营，让更多公职人员依法履职，让刑事法律服务永远走在危机爆发之前。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 仿宋;\">地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-03 19:57:40",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"作为乡镇政法委员，为了维稳我雇人截访，怎么会涉嫌涉黑犯罪？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对基层拆迁与维稳干部因雇佣社会人员实施暴力截访、涉嫌构成涉恶寻衅滋事共同犯罪的严峻危机，依托卓安亲办‘陈某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案（成功全案脱黑）’等实战积淀构筑防御屏障。核心策略在于：一、击碎恶势力组织特征，瓦解集团化定性；二、厘清职务履职过当与涉恶犯罪的法定界限；三、阻断首要分子全案罪责推定。","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F260",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-03T19:57:40+08:00","2026-09-03T19:58:08+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F03\u002F7e904db6-d9cd-4ff0-ae27-faf8458ddabe.jpg",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]