[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-professional-235":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,161,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},268,"X某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪累计近十七万元，团队律师为其辩护，一审终获十年四个月有期徒刑","一、案情简介 胥某利用职务之便，多次对彭某开设的赌场提供保护伞，并收取彭某财物累计十余万元 被告人胥某，男，2014年2月27日因涉嫌受贿罪被某区检察院决定刑事拘留，同日由成都市公安局某区分局执行，同年3月13日因涉嫌受贿罪由成都市市人民检",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":43,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},235,"2026-09-02 17:32:39","我作为财务按老板指令扣除放款手续费，被倒查涉黑该怎么自保？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F02\u002Fac967996-790a-4600-a1b0-0a9270d02b75.png","\u003Cp>【摘要】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>针对民间借贷与小额贷款极易被拔高指控为“套路贷”涉恶犯罪的危机，依托卓安亲办“H某涉黑案（成功降维为涉恶集团并打掉多项罪名）”实战经验，核心风控在于：一、穿透核算真实资金流水；二、阻断非法占有目的；三、严格剥离组织犯罪特征。在常态化扫黑除恶的严峻形势下，民间金融从业者究竟该如何选对律师精准洗清涉黑涉恶嫌疑？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【专业支持】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文由 成安律师（近30年刑事法律实务经验｜百人级刑事专业律师团队｜刑事风控与合规｜刑事危机应对与化解｜重大疑难刑事案件辩护） 提供法律实务支持。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>成安律师简介： 法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>团队实战经验： 专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“我们经营一家民间借贷咨询公司，做车辆抵押借款和短期过桥垫资。借款人来借钱，合同都是当面签的，钱也是实打实打到对方账户上的。因为借款人征信较差、风险高，我们在放款时扣了前置利息（砍头息），收了GPS安装费、服务费和违约保证金。后来部分借款人逾期不还，我们按照合同约定处置了车辆，并通过电话提醒、上门催告要求还款。结果最近公安机关把我们公司几十号人全抓了，定性为‘套路贷涉黑恶犯罪团伙’，罪名涉及诈骗、敲诈勒索、寻衅滋事、非法拘禁，甚至说我们通过虚假诉讼侵占他人财产。借款人明明拿了钱也违了约，我们怎么突然就成了套路贷犯罪分子？这时候到底该找什么样的律师，才能帮我们把真实的民间借贷与套路贷诈骗彻底分清楚？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F02\u002Fac967996-790a-4600-a1b0-0a9270d02b75.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一、合同真实且实际放了款，为何仍会被公诉机关指控为“套路贷”涉恶犯罪？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在小额贷款、典当抵押、车贷房贷、短期过桥和民间融资领域，很多经营者常常深陷一种认知误区：“借款合同是白纸黑字签的，借款人确实拿到了本金，我们收取高额利息和违约金只是民事上的违规高利贷，公安凭什么以‘套路贷’涉黑涉恶抓我们？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>然而，在当前的刑事司法实践中，办案机关区分正常民间借贷与“套路贷”刑事犯罪的核心标准，从来不是看有没有一张形式上的借款合同，而是看经营模式中是否存在“以非法占有为目的”的虚假债权设定机制。如果放贷机构在签约阶段诱导借款人签订虚高借条、双倍借条或阴阳合同；在放款时制造“全额打款、立即现金回流”的虚假流水；在还款阶段通过故意关机、拒不收款、更改还款账号等手段恶意制造借款人“违约”；在借款人无力偿还时，由关联人员假借第三方名义“平账”，导致债务像滚雪球一样被数十倍、上百倍虚增；最后通过跟踪滋扰、堵门泼漆、扣押车辆甚至利用虚假材料提起民商事诉讼强行占有抵押物——在公诉机关眼里，这种行为就已经从民商事借贷彻底质变为以虚增债务为手段的诈骗与敲诈勒索犯罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一旦涉案人数达到三人以上，且在当地涉及多起借款人报案与群体性纠纷，办案机关就会依据常态化扫黑除恶的定性标准，直接将该借贷机构立案定性为涉恶势力犯罪集团甚至黑社会性质组织。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】杨某恶势力犯罪团伙案（审查起诉阶段成功打掉聚众斗殴罪，数罪并罚获从轻判处有期徒刑五年）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案情背景与指控风险：被告人杨某在当地经营一家小额贷款公司。在收取贷款过程中，因部分借款客户长期逾期不还款，杨某在催收中对部分人员采取了限制人身自由、言语恐吓等过激方式，并卷入当地多起打架斗殴冲突。公安机关侦查终结后，指控杨某涉嫌寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等多项重罪，并将其认定为“恶势力犯罪团伙纠集者”，面临数罪并罚判处十年以上重刑的巨大风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1.穿透卷宗证据阻击法定最重罪名：卓安团队在审查起诉阶段对涉嫌聚众斗殴的全部证据进行全方位交叉比对，向检察院出具专项法律意见，证实该冲突系由民间债务引发的偶发纠纷，杨某主观上缺乏聚众斗殴的恶意，成功促使检察院在起诉前撤回了聚众斗殴罪的指控；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.运用前沿法条竞合理论化解重罪拔高：团队引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，深入论证其与非法拘禁、寻衅滋事的竞合关系，指出催收行为事出有因，坚决反对将借贷纠纷中的过激催收机械拔高为恶势力重罪；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3.严格区分民事借贷前置与刑事手段违法：将真实债权与催收手段进行分层抗辩，证明杨某主观恶性小、积极退赃退赔，构建起扎实的罪轻辩护防线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果：成安律师在案件研讨中指出：“涉黑涉恶案件绝不能搞概念化审判，必须坚持每一个罪名都有扎实的证据支持，把原本属于民事违约引发的纠纷从黑恶重罪中剥离出来。”法院最终采纳了卓安律师的辩护意见，未对杨某按恶势力施加严苛重罚，数罪并罚合并决定执行有期徒刑五年，罚金三万元，取得了优异的辩护成效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在涉及“套路贷”涉黑涉恶的案件中，“打财断血”措施极其彻底。办案机关通常会直接查封放贷机构名下的所有资金账户、抵押房产和抵押车辆，甚至追缴投资人与股东的合法出资款。如果不能在第一时间由专业刑事律师介入，理清真实借贷本金与虚增债务的界限、剥离涉黑涉恶定性，当事人和企业不仅将面临重刑，合法财产也将被全盘没收。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二、高利借贷、违规收费与“套路贷”犯罪，真正的法律分水岭到底在哪里？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>很多从事民间金融的高管和业务员常常困惑：我们到底犯了什么罪？高利放贷算不算“套路贷”？要回答这些问题，必须依据最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部《关于办理“套路贷”刑事案件若干问题的意见》，在法律层面上建立起清晰的分水岭：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一道分水岭：民间高利借贷与“套路贷”诈骗的本质区别。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>正常的民间高利借贷，哪怕年化利率高达50%甚至100%，出借人的主观目的依然是“让借款人按约定还本付息”，其追求的是利息收益；尽管超过法律规定的利率部分在民法上无效，但借款本金依然受到民事法律关系的调整，绝不构成刑事上的诈骗罪。而“套路贷”的核心在于“主观上具有非法占有他人财物的故意”，放贷人从一开始就不希望借款人顺利还款，而是处心积虑通过虚增借条、制造违约、肆意平账，最终目的不是收利息，而是通过制造虚假债权强行吞并借款人的房产、车辆等巨额抵押物。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二道分水岭：前置利息（砍头息）、服务费与虚假债权的认定标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在实务中，扣除“砍头息”或收取中介服务费属于金融借贷中的违规或民事瑕疵行为，但这并不必然等同于“套路贷”中的虚增债务。辩护律师必须精准审查：扣除费用后实际交付给借款人的资金是多少？合同约定的金额与实际交付金额之间是否存在合理的商业解释？借款人对扣除费用的性质是否充分知情并自愿接受？如果仅仅是利息畸高，应当属于民事纠纷或涉嫌非法经营罪的审查范围，绝不能直接推定为以非法占有为目的的诈骗罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三道分水岭：违规催收手段与敲诈勒索、催收非法债务罪的法条界限。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在催收环节，如果借款确实存在，出借人为了索要欠款实施了滋扰、恐吓、限制人身自由等行为，依照我国现行刑法，应优先适用《刑法》第二百九十三条之一催收非法债务罪（法定刑最高为三年有期徒刑）；而公诉机关往往倾向于以法定刑更重的敲诈勒索罪（数额特别巨大可判处十年以上有期徒刑）提起公诉。二者的核心界限在于：行为人索要的款项是基于真实产生的债务本息，还是无中生有、恶意虚增的虚假债务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第四道分水岭：涉案犯罪金额的穿透式审计核算。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在“套路贷”案件中，公诉机关最初指控的涉案金额往往直接按照借款合同上的虚高面额或流水总额计算，数额动辄数千万元甚至上亿元。专业的刑事辩护必须依托司法会计审计思维，将涉案金额严格穿透为：“实际放款金额 - 借款人已实际归还的本息 = 实际争议金额”，坚决将虚高借条中未经实际交付的部分、借款人已归还的本金以及正常的借款本息，从犯罪金额中精准剔除。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三、办案机关将借贷案件拔高定性为黑恶势力时，黑社会性质组织“四个特征”该如何严格检验？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在扫黑除恶常态化的司法背景下，民间借贷机构一旦涉案，极易被办案机关“拔高定性”。要打掉涉黑涉恶的帽子，必须严格对照《刑法》第二百九十四条以及《反有组织犯罪法》规定的法定标准，对黑社会性质组织的“四个特征”逐项进行反向质证：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1.组织特征的检验：黑社会性质组织要求组织结构稳定、人数较多、有明确的组织者与领导者、骨干成员基本固定，且有明确的组织纪律和规约。民间借贷公司只是按照公司法设立的市场经营主体，员工之间是普通的雇佣与劳动从属关系，公司推行的是业绩考核与考勤制度而非黑恶规约；业务员离职频繁、流动性极大，根本不符合组织特征所要求的“稳定性与人身依附性”；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.经济特征的检验：涉黑组织要求通过违法犯罪活动敛财，并将巨额收益用于支持组织的活动、购买作案装备、豢养组织成员或寻求非法保护。借贷公司的资金来源于股东出资或正常民间借贷，收益主要用于支付员工正常工资、缴纳写字楼租金和依法纳税，并未用于任何违法犯罪活动，根本不具备涉黑组织的经济特征；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3.行为特征的检验：黑恶犯罪要求有组织地多次实施暴力、威胁、“软暴力”等为非作恶、欺压残害群众的行为。律师在阅卷时必须对全案借款人逐一核对：绝大多数借款人是否属于正常履约还款？所谓的催收过激行为是全员制度化实施，还是个别业务员为了冲业绩擅自实施的偶发越界行为？绝不能把分散的民商事催款行为直接推定为有组织的黑恶暴力；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>4.危害性特征的检验：黑社会性质组织要求“在一定区域或者行业内，形成非法控制或者重大影响，严重破坏经济、社会生活秩序”。借贷公司在特定区域开展抵押贷款，既没有垄断当地的民间借贷市场，也没有利用暴力手段破坏金融秩序，更没有在当地形成称霸一方的“地下秩序”，完全不具备危害性特征的法定要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所始终强调：涉黑涉恶辩护必须从底层的客观证据做起，把每一笔借款的流向、每一次催收的录音、每一个员工的具体岗位职责拆解到底，坚决阻止用主观定性替代证据裁判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四、当借贷机构被立案调查时，老板、财务与业务员最容易陷入哪四大认知盲区？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在处理民间金融与小额贷款涉刑案件中，卓安团队发现，从企业老板到基层业务员，往往被四大自欺欺人的认知盲区所麻痹：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，“借款人违约在先，我有合同就能随便扣车平账”的私力救济盲区。很多车贷机构老板认为，借款人逾期不还款触发了合同违约条款，自己派人去把车拖回来、逼对方一次性结清全款属于正当维权。但在刑事法律中，私力救济必须受限。如果未经借款人同意强行破窗拖车、在半路截停车辆甚至殴打司机，这种行为在司法机关眼里就会直接被评价为寻衅滋事罪甚至抢劫罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，“砍头息和保证金是全行业惯例，算不上诈骗犯罪”的从众盲区。不少放贷人员在被讯问时理直气壮地辩称：“全国做车贷房贷的都要扣两个点的前置费用，大家都这么干，凭什么定我诈骗？”刑法的适用绝不承认所谓的“行业潜规则”。如果扣除费用后依然要求借款人按照合同全额金额出具欠条，并在起诉时隐瞒扣除费用的事实，这种行为在刑法上就是典型的虚构事实、隐瞒真相。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三，“我只是打工按指令做账\u002F打电话，出事由老板顶着”的基层免责盲区。小贷公司的财务、风控审核人员和一线业务员常常以为自己只是领固定工资的打工人，一切听老板安排，出了事自然与自己无关。但在共同犯罪审查中，如果财务人员明知借贷流水系虚假制造仍协助走账，业务员明知合同金额虚高仍诱导客户签字，司法机关就会将其认定为共同犯罪的帮助犯追究刑事责任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第四，“赶紧私下退钱找关系，就能大事化小小事化了”的私了盲区。有些企业在借款人报警后，慌忙安排人员私下向借款人全额退款、退还车辆，或者四处托人“找关系”打听案情。这种未经专业法律指导的盲目退赔与私下勾兑，不仅无法消灭此前的犯罪构成要件，反而直接暴露了心虚的心理，甚至让企业陷入被司法掮客巨额诈骗的二次危机。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>成安律师指出，企业一旦面临刑事调查，唯一的生路是回归法治轨道，以专业严谨的证据架构去对抗不当的刑事追责。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>五、危机爆发的最初阶段，哪些盲目自救动作会直接坐实“套路贷”与涉黑指控？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在放贷机构被公安机关立案调查的前期，涉案企业与当事人家属极易在极度恐慌中做出极其危险的错误动作：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>首先，连夜删改借贷系统数据、隐匿真实放款与还款流水。有些企业负责人在获悉公安介入后，第一反应是指令技术部门清空服务器上的放贷记录、销毁空白借条底稿、删除业务员的微信工作群。这种操作在公安网安部门的大数据镜像与数据恢复技术面前无异于自掘坟墓。一旦被查实有系统性删库行为，不仅无法对抗现代取证技术，更直接剥夺了企业利用原始流水证明“借款人实际收到本金、借贷系真实发生”的核心出罪证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>其次，突击进行多层私账转移资金或藏匿抵押资产。有些机构为了防止账户被冻结，紧急将公司的放贷回款通过地下钱庄或员工个人卡转移至关联空壳公司，或者将扣押的抵押车辆连夜转移至异地车库隐匿。这种资金与财产的异常异动在扫黑专案组眼中，属于典型的隐匿涉黑涉恶资产与洗钱分赃行为，会直接招致办案机关对企业及股东个人合法资产的全盘查封扣押。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>再次，盲目迷信“司法掮客”搞花钱平事。在核心高管被刑事拘留后，家属在巨大精神压力下，极易轻信社会上宣称“能找到领导打招呼、打包保证撤销涉恶定性、几天内办出取保候审”的中间人。无数惨痛教训表明，这类所谓的关系运作绝大多数是诈骗，不仅导致数百万资金打了水漂，更会白白耗尽在侦查阶段“黄金37天”内向检察机关提交不予批捕意见、向公安机关提交真实借贷凭据的宝贵时间窗口。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所始终坚守“坚决杜绝虚假承诺、司法勾兑，做有温度有底线的专业律所”的服务信条。面对复杂的“套路贷”与涉黑涉恶指控，唯有依靠合法的程序参与、严密的证据梳理和专业的法理抗辩，才是化解危机的唯一正道。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>六、如何构建全链条的责任隔离墙，并在涉黑涉恶指控中实现精准剥离？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>面对“套路贷”与涉黑涉恶的重刑风险，企业与专业刑辩团队必须在事前、事中、事后构建全流程的责任防御体系：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1.事前合规防火墙与产品合规化：民间借贷机构在设计产品时，必须严格执行本金、利息、服务费分别记账的财务规范，坚决杜绝“制造全额放款假流水、立即收回一部分”的违规操作；在催收环节推行全流程通话录音质检，坚决禁止一切侵入住宅、限制人身自由和网络骚扰行为；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.事中证据固化与事实链还原：一旦面临警方调查，企业必须第一时间封存所有借款合同原件、银行放款流水单据、借款人身份核验记录、抵押登记证明、真实的还款对账单以及全流程通话录音，制作完整的“逐笔借贷事实还原表”，用无可辩驳的客观数据证明民间借贷的真实性；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3.事后定性纠偏与合法财产隔离：案件进入审查起诉和审判阶段后，辩护律师应紧扣“非法占有目的”与“黑社会性质组织四个特征”，逐一击破诈骗、敲诈勒索与涉黑涉恶指控；同时提交详实的个人财产与出资来源证明，坚决将合法的出资本金、正常利息收入与涉案争议款项严格隔离。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安刑事法律风控与危机应对团队经典案例复盘】H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案（涉黑成功降维为涉恶集团并打掉多项罪名）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案情背景与指控风险：被告人H某被公诉机关指控参加黑社会性质组织罪，并涉及寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪等多项罪名。全案指控该组织长期盘踞当地民间金融与商业领域，实施多起暴力与“软暴力”催收违法犯罪。H某面临被认定为涉黑组织重要成员、数罪并罚判处十年以上有期徒刑的极高风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所的风控\u002F辩护突破口：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1.穿透经济依附关系否定涉黑四个特征：卓安律师团队全面调阅海量卷宗，深入梳理H某名下的全部资金往来与业务记录，向法庭充分论证H某资金完全独立、业务行为自主、从未分享涉黑组织的违法所得，全案缺乏组织统一供养和经济管控的证据，彻底推翻了涉黑组织的法定要件；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.逐案拆解个罪证据阻击多项指控：针对起诉书指控的非法拘禁罪与敲诈勒索罪，辩护律师逐一核对现场录像与证人证言，指出案涉索赔系由真实经济纠纷引发，H某不具备非法占有目的，且现场未达到非法拘禁的法定强制程度；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3.推动公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性：依托“控辩审学”四维视角的扎实论证，促使公诉机关主动调整指控思路。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>庭审交锋与裁判\u002F化解结果：成安律师在庭审辩护中强调：“刑事司法定罪必须坚持证据标准，不能因为涉案人员多、涉及经济纠纷广，就用抽象的涉黑概念代替对个罪证据与组织特征的严格审查。”法院最终全盘采纳了卓安律师的辩护意见，依法将全案性质由“黑社会性质组织”成功降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，并且对起诉指控的非法拘禁罪、敲诈勒索罪两项重罪不予认定，H某的量刑从十年以上大幅降至有期徒刑八年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在办理重大疑难涉黑涉恶及经济犯罪案件时，卓安律师事务所依托特有的“三级品控体系”（主办律师自查、部门负责人复核、管委会重点把关）与“大案专家会诊机制”，为每一起案件提供全方位、多维度的专业保障。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>七、被指控“套路贷”涉黑涉恶后，当事人与家属必须立即核对哪些核心证据清单？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>面对“套路贷”与涉黑涉恶的突发刑事调查，企业与涉案家属切忌慌乱，应当立刻对照下表，对企业内部的核心证据展开全面排查与固化：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>核查维度\t必须立即固定的客观凭证\t高危涉刑雷区与违规动作\t合规隔离与辩护应对要点\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>借贷合同\t借款人本人签字的借款合同、抵押担保合同、借款用途说明、真实身份认证包\t签订空白借条；签订双倍金额虚高借条；阴阳合同；事后倒签补造借据\t证明双方意思表示真实；将借款本金与利息约定拆分，证明无诈骗故意\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>放款流水\t银行对公\u002F个人放款对账单、第三方支付转账凭证、借款人提现与资金去向明细\t制造全额打款、立即现金回流的虚假流水；扣除高额前置费用却无约定\t制作《实际放款与还款逐笔对账表》，以实际交付本金为基准阻断虚增债务\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>收费依据\t服务协议、居间合同、GPS安装发票、征信查询授权书、借款人自愿支付凭证\t无任何服务内容却巧立名目收取天价服务费；将违法利息伪装为违约金\t证明费用收取具有真实对价；将违规民事收费从犯罪数额中精准剥离\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>还款记录\t借款人所有历史还款转账记录、对账确认单、结清证明、展期协议书\t故意失联制造借款人违约；肆意认定违约并强行平账；撕毁还款收条\t证明借款人履约历史；证明公司从未恶意制造违约以吞并借款人抵押物\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>催收过程\t完整未剪辑的催收通话录音、现场调解协议、诉讼保全裁定书、110处警记录\t强行扣押车辆并擅自变卖；上门喷字堵锁眼；贴身看管限制人身自由\t证明索赔系基于真实债务；将催收手段依法定性为催收非法债务而非敲诈勒索\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>危机应对\t办案机关调证通知书、物品扣押清单、原始数据只读光盘、专业刑辩法律意见书\t连夜删除借贷系统数据；组织员工串供；花巨资找“司法掮客”试图私了\t立即委托专业刑事律所介入；封存原始数据载体；依法申请合法财产甄别隔离\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>八、面对复杂的金融刑案与扫黑高压，为什么团队化刑事精品律所才是坚实后盾？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在常态化扫黑除恶与金融司法严监管交织的法治环境下，涉案企业与当事人面临的不仅是单一罪名的抗辩，更是一场涵盖借贷模式实质穿透、海量金融流水审计、涉黑涉恶定性纠错与合法财产保全的综合博弈。正如成安律师常说的：“最好的刑事风控，不仅要懂法律条文，更要懂金融商业决策场景、懂人性幽微、懂公检法机关的内部裁判逻辑。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四川卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，就坚定地选择了一条极其纯粹的专业化道路——坚决不做兼顾多领域的“万金油”律所，将全部资源倾注于刑事领域，成为全国第三家只专注刑事业务的精品专业律师事务所。为了记录中国刑辩制度的演进、弘扬法治精神，卓安创办了中国首家“刑辩文化馆”，十余年来接待了各地司法机关、律师协会、知名高校及企业界人士近万人次参访交流，成为了中国刑事辩护领域的重要文化地标。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安之所以能够在涉黑涉恶定性纠错、金融犯罪与涉企刑事合规领域建立起卓越的行业声誉，依托的是其独具特色的核心优势：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1.“控、辩、审、学”四维一体办案视角：卓安汇聚了近百名专职刑事律师，团队中近三分之一拥有原法院、检察院、公安机关或监察机关的资深一线从业背景，同时拥有11位法学博士及30余位法学硕士。每一个重大疑难案件，均由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑与证据漏洞，前法官把握裁判尺度与量刑边界，法学博士提供前沿法理支撑，资深刑辩律师制定最优防护策略，实现多维度的集体研讨；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.“主办律师 + 专属客户经理”双线服务模式：刑事风暴不仅考验法律技巧，更直接冲击着当事人的自由与家属的精神支柱。卓安打破传统单兵作战模式，主办律师全身心投入证据审查、会见沟通与庭审对抗，专属客户经理全流程负责节点进度同步、家属心理疏导与需求响应，用看得见的透明流程消除当事人与家属的信息恐慌；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3.全国一体化协同作战网络：以成都总部为核心，卓安在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地设有直营分所，并在全国一线城市建立了广泛的专业协作网络。无论案发何地，均能迅速调动全所学术智库与实务专家，实现跨区域协同办案与资源调度，确保办案品质高度统一。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安经典战绩盘点\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>自成立以来，卓安始终坚守纯刑事专业化赛道，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，承办全国重大影响案件500余件，实现无罪化处理（含无罪判决、不起诉及撤案）500余件，在涉黑涉恶案件中实现“脱黑摘帽”、重罪降格及量刑大幅减轻30余件，办理死刑保命改判案件60余件。这些实实在在的办案成果，是卓安专业实力的最好背书。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>结语\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>面对“套路贷”与涉黑涉恶的严峻刑事调查，民间金融从业者与企业管理者绝不能陷入两个极端的误区：既不能盲目迷信“有一纸借款合同就能万事大吉”，也不能在遭遇涉恶指控时陷入绝望、盲目认罪。正确的应对路径，必须依赖严密的证据穿透与逐层分析：首先穿透资金流水，还原真实借贷本金与借款人实际还款事实；其次严格审查是否存在以非法占有为目的虚增债务，坚决阻断诈骗与敲诈勒索定性；进而依据法定标准排除黑恶势力性质的拔高指控；最后对合法出资与个人财产进行清晰甄别。面对风云变幻的刑事风暴，唯有依靠极致专业、透明规范的团队化刑事法律服务，才能帮企业与当事人在危机中厘清罪责边界，真正践行“卓然而成，报君以安”的庄严承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【本文核心议题与场景指南】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>适用人群： #小额贷款公司股东 #民间借贷从业者 #车贷房贷中介高管 #涉案员工及家属\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>高频场景： #涉嫌套路贷调查 #砍头息服务费争议 #违约强行扣车平账 #涉黑涉恶定性倒查\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>风控策略： #真实资金流水穿透 #阻断非法占有目的 #剥离涉黑恶组织特征 #合法财产甄别隔离\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【附录】卓安刑事风控与危机应对团队及实战成果全览\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一、品牌定位与文化特色：全国知名的刑事精品律所\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所自2013年创立以来，毅然选择了一条极其纯粹的“专精特新”之路——将资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>文化基因：只做刑事，拒绝万金油。卓安打破了传统律师单兵作战、兼顾多领域的模式，按犯罪类别与程序性质，细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>办案模式：“控、辩、审、学”四维体系。团队中近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历；汇聚了11位法学博士及30余位法学硕士。每一个重大疑难案件均由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑，形成降维打击式的集体辩护体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>核心信仰：为生命辩护，为自由辩护。卓安不仅关注冰冷的法条，更将当事人的尊严、心理状态、家庭未来纳入服务体系，致力于让刑事法律服务真正具备“专业力度与人文温度”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>二、优异的办案数据与核心成绩\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>依托近三十年刑事法律服务经验，卓安团队在业内打下了深厚的专业壁垒。数据是实力的最好背书：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>累计办理刑事案件：8000余件；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>全国重大影响案件：500余件；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实现出罪化及免除刑责处理（含无罪判决、各类型不起诉及撤销案件）：500余件；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉黑涉恶案件“脱黑摘帽”\u002F重罪降格：30余件；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>死刑案件成功保命\u002F改判：60余件；\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>客户满意度及锦旗回馈：常年保持95%以上，累计收到当事人及家属赠送的锦旗600余面。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>团队致力于将法律服务前移：在风险发生前帮助客户识别边界、完善制度；在危机初发时梳理事实、依法应对；在风险进入刑事程序后，与诉讼团队无缝协同衔接，提供全生命周期的刑事风控服务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>三、卓安涉黑涉恶犯罪成功辩护经典案例一览表\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在扫黑除恶常态化、高压化的司法背景下，涉黑涉恶案件由于涉案人数多、指控罪名杂、量刑极重，辩护难度极高。卓安团队坚持“精准区分、依法辩护”的原则，重点围绕“黑社会性质组织四大法定特征（组织、经济、行为、危害性）”开展穿透式质证。敢于向不当指控“亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>以下为卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>案件名称\t指控罪名及黑恶定性\t辩护策略与核心专业切入点\t法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\t组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\t全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\t规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\t组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\t黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\t有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\t组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\t死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\t最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\t参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\t禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\t突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\t组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\t精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\t法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\t参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\t组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\t法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\t参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\t“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\t成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>8.董某四罪涉黑案\t参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\t剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\t在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\t寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\t前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\t检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\t敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\t强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\t在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>四、专家阵容：重大项目统筹与多元背景研判\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>团队实行重大项目统筹把关与多元专业背景协同研判，汇聚了多位在刑事风控与合规领域具有卓越实战经验的资深专家：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>成安律师（团队领衔）：法学博士，拥有近30年刑事法律实务经验，卓安律师事务所首席律师、庭立方核心导师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>打造了全国规模化刑事专业律所——卓安，带领百人级刑事专业律师团队。曾受聘担任省级公安厅经侦及食药环侦查专家顾问，系四川省律师协会首批认证的“刑事专业律师”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注为公职人员、企业家及高管提供专业刑事法律服务，核心业务涵盖：企业刑事风控与合规顾问、突发刑事危机应对与化解、监察留置应对辅导（陪跑）、刑事诉讼全流程顾问、重大疑难刑事案件辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深度聚焦食药环（食品药品、生态环境）、工程建筑、金融证券、教育等重点产业，并在涉税犯罪防治、知识产权刑事保护、数据合规、反商业贿赂等前沿交叉领域开展专项研究。擅长穿透各行业底层商业模式，依托真实业务场景，精准识别并阻断固有的刑事法律风险，提供贴合产业实际的定制化刑事合规服务方案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>累计为百余家上市企业提供深度刑事风控审查与法律顾问服务；妥善办理300余起政商高管刑事危机应对案例，担任500余位企业家私人刑事合规顾问，开展800余场企业风控内训，主导办理1000余起重大疑难刑事案件，持续输出具备行业穿透力的实务风险处置方案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>何冰冰律师：卓安律师事务所主任。原市级检察院员额检察官、公诉人、反贪局侦查科科长。从事法律工作十几年，参与办理各类刑事案件1000余件，重点负责公职人员履职风险和重大危机应对。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>艾述洪律师：卓安律师事务所执行主任、成都市律师协会刑事诉讼专业委员会主任。近二十年来专注刑事辩护与合规审查，在重大涉黑恶案件（如G某涉黑案等）中多次成功运用程序辩护与类案检索策略，大幅降低当事人刑罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>魏军律师：卓安律师事务所副主任。原中级人民法院刑事审判庭副庭长，具有20年丰富刑事审判经验，重点从审判标准和证据评价视角开展重大风险研判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>任忠孙律师：卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任。长期办理重大、复杂刑事案件，重点负责粤港澳大湾区企业刑事风控、跨区域危机应对及重大项目协同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>黄婧律师：卓安（昆明）律师事务所主任。国家高级企业合规师，重点负责企业合规体系建设、企业家刑事风险防控及西南地区跨区域项目。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>邹轶律师：卓安律师事务所合伙人。四川大学刑法学硕士，重点负责经济犯罪、职务犯罪、财税票据风险及企业刑事风控体系建设。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>五、初心与使命\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>正如卓安首席律师成安博士所言：“我的职业前半程，主要是在风险转化为案件以后为当事人辩护；职业后半程，我更希望把办案经验用在风险发生之前，帮助更多人看见边界、建立防线！”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安团队深刻认识到，刑事法律风控绝不是帮助客户逃避监管、掩盖事实或者转移责任，而是帮助客户在法律框架内识别风险、纠正问题、完善制度。卓安坚持“以刑事诉讼经验洞察风险，以合规制度预防风险，以危机应对控制风险，以团队协同守住底线”，让更多企业安稳经营，让更多公职人员依法履职，让刑事法律服务永远走在危机爆发之前。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：18884125005\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>地址：四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-02 17:43:19",{"id":43,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":43,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"professional","罪名分类","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F8cfc49d7-c529-46c5-a6f1-d03a37047b2b.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":628,"jsonLd":639},"我作为财务按老板指令扣除放款手续费，被倒查涉黑该怎么自保？ - 罪名分类 | 四川卓安律师事务所","【摘要】 针对民间借贷与小额贷款极易被拔高指控为“套路贷”涉恶犯罪的危机，依托卓安亲办“H某涉黑案（成功降维为涉恶集团并打掉多项罪名）”实战经验，核心风控在于：一、穿透核算真实资金流水；二、阻断非法占有目的；三、严格剥离组织犯罪特征。在常态化扫黑除恶的严峻形势下，民间金融从业者究竟该如何选对律师精准洗清涉黑涉恶嫌疑？ ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional\u002F235",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642,649],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"url":638,"headline":627,"description":637,"datePublished":644,"dateModified":645,"author":646,"publisher":647,"articleSection":633,"inLanguage":586,"image":648},"Article","2026-09-02T17:43:19+08:00","2026-09-02T17:32:39+08:00",{"@id":588},{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F02\u002Fac967996-790a-4600-a1b0-0a9270d02b75.png",{"@type":650,"itemListElement":651},"BreadcrumbList",[652,655,657],{"@type":653,"position":6,"name":654,"item":578},"ListItem","首页",{"@type":653,"position":38,"name":633,"item":656},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Fprofessional",{"@type":653,"position":35,"name":627,"item":638}]