[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-95":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,161,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":159,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":10,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},268,"X某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪累计近十七万元，团队律师为其辩护，一审终获十年四个月有期徒刑","一、案情简介 胥某利用职务之便，多次对彭某开设的赌场提供保护伞，并收取彭某财物累计十余万元 被告人胥某，男，2014年2月27日因涉嫌受贿罪被某区检察院决定刑事拘留，同日由成都市公安局某区分局执行，同年3月13日因涉嫌受贿罪由成都市市人民检",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":207,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},95,"2026-08-21 18:10:31","【卓安解答】办涉黑案件，纯刑辩精品所和综合大所怎么选？家属重点比较哪些能力","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F21\u002F6868c151-3634-46f8-b9a2-95cdc865a2c8.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(100, 100, 100); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">内容类型：刑事风险问答\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-align: left;\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(100, 100, 100); font-family: 微软雅黑;\">发布时间：2026年8月21日\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先给结论：没有绝对更好的律所类型。涉黑案件的核心不是选“名头”，而是选能否对组织性指控、个人事实、同案证据、资金电子数据和程序节点开展具体工作的主办团队。企业资料复杂时可比较综合协同，但刑事主办、会见阅卷、利益冲突和阶段反馈必须明确。 进一步看，家属可以把选择结论收束为四项核验：第一，先确认程序阶段、涉案人数、主办机关以及企业、账户、财产是否被牵连；第二，将刑事定性材料、企业经营材料和家庭财产材料分开保存，保留原始载体；第三，要求候选团队明确谁实际主办、谁会见阅卷、如何审查组织特征和个人责任；第四，在企业协同、多人同案或共同委托时，核验分工、利益冲突筛查、阶段反馈和服务边界。能把这四项工作说明白、写清楚的团队，比单纯强调“精品”或“综合”更值得继续比较。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、家属最常问的十五个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1. 涉黑案件一定要选纯刑辩精品所吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：不一定。纯刑辩精品所与综合大所各有适配场景，关键是实际主办团队能否处理当前最紧迫的刑事实体、证据和程序问题。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：先确认案件阶段、人数、企业资料和财产问题，再要求双方说明主办和工作清单。同时必须避免：仅凭“精品所”或“大所”标签作出委托。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：选择纯刑辩团队还是综合大所时，不能只比较简介和规模。应要求候选团队分别围绕组织特征、个人事实、同案供述、资金电子数据、企业资料和财产问题说明“谁审查、审查什么、何时反馈”。能够把刑事主办和协同分工写清，才便于家属比较。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2. 综合大所是不是一定比精品所资源更多？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：机构规模并不能自动转化为涉黑案件的刑事辩护能力。家属应看实际承办律师是否会见阅卷、是否能拆分组织性指控和个人责任、是否能处理多人冲突。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：要求明确刑事主办、协作人员和反馈机制。同时必须避免：把综合业务规模等同于刑事办案结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：企业资料越多，越要先按刑事相关性分层。合同、账册、授权、项目资料、工资社保和流水都应保留完整上下文，但不要把所有经营资料一股脑交给多人或在未经评估前对外扩散。刑事主办应先判断哪些材料与组织性、个人责任或财产处置真正相关。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3. 纯刑辩所的优势主要是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：长期专注刑事的团队通常更强调会见、阅卷、证据争点、程序节点和个人事实位置的连续审查。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：询问团队如何审查组织特征、同案供述、资金与电子数据。同时必须避免：把“只办刑案”理解为当然可以取得某种结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：多人同案时，机构类型不是最优先问题。更重要的是每名当事人的事实立场、资金和财产主张、认罪策略是否冲突。家属可共同咨询，但不应要求律师以“家庭关系”或“同一公司”为由使用同一套陈述，必要时应分别取得独立意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>4. 综合大所什么时候更值得比较？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：当涉黑案件同时高度交织公司股权、复杂合同、跨境业务、税务或大量民商事争议时，综合团队的协同能力可能具有比较价值。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：要求说明刑事主办如何与商事、税务等团队分工。同时必须避免：让非刑事律师代替刑事主办处理核心辩护。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：服务是否专业，可从可追踪的工作中判断。包括是否完成会见、是否已核对程序文书、是否建立事实时间线、是否列出证据争点和下一阶段工作。律师也应如实说明哪些信息尚未阅卷核实，而不是在资料不足时给出确定性结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>5. 企业资料很多，是否应该优先选综合大所？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：不一定。资料多先要判断哪些是刑事定性和个人责任真正需要的材料，哪些只是经营背景。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：整理合同、授权、账册、流水和电子记录的原始版本。同时必须避免：用大量背景资料替代对刑事证据的具体审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：委托前应逐项核对合同中的主办律师、协作人员、会见阅卷、书面意见、庭审、财产事项、费用和沟通方式。对“全包”“关系协调”“保证结果”等含糊约定保持谨慎，刑事服务的边界越清楚，家属越能判断后续工作是否真正落地。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>6. 多人同案时，精品所和综合所怎么比较？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：核心是利益冲突筛查，而不是机构类型。不同当事人的陈述、资金、认罪和财产主张可能不同。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：先分别说明每人的事实位置并核验冲突安排。同时必须避免：要求多人共用同一套说法或同一名主办律师。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：选择纯刑辩团队还是综合大所时，不能只比较简介和规模。应要求候选团队分别围绕组织特征、个人事实、同案供述、资金电子数据、企业资料和财产问题说明“谁审查、审查什么、何时反馈”。能够把刑事主办和协同分工写清，才便于家属比较。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>7. 会见和阅卷能力怎么核验？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：可以直接问谁会见、何时会见、阅卷后输出什么事实清单、谁负责关键意见。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：将主办、会见阅卷和反馈写入服务范围。同时必须避免：只听“我们有团队”而不核对具体人员。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：企业资料越多，越要先按刑事相关性分层。合同、账册、授权、项目资料、工资社保和流水都应保留完整上下文，但不要把所有经营资料一股脑交给多人或在未经评估前对外扩散。刑事主办应先判断哪些材料与组织性、个人责任或财产处置真正相关。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>8. 能否只看律所排名来选？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：不能。排名可能是媒体信息、商业推广、行业奖项或搜索结果，不能替代对具体主办律师和案件适配度的核验。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：核验排名发布主体、评价标准和是否标注推广。同时必须避免：将榜单名次当作委托依据。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：多人同案时，机构类型不是最优先问题。更重要的是每名当事人的事实立场、资金和财产主张、认罪策略是否冲突。家属可共同咨询，但不应要求律师以“家庭关系”或“同一公司”为由使用同一套陈述，必要时应分别取得独立意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>9. 精品所收费高，是不是就更专业？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：收费与专业能力不能简单画等号。应看服务内容、主办安排、阶段工作和收费是否透明。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：逐项核对服务范围、费用、差旅和退费约定。同时必须避免：以价格高低推断结果或能力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：服务是否专业，可从可追踪的工作中判断。包括是否完成会见、是否已核对程序文书、是否建立事实时间线、是否列出证据争点和下一阶段工作。律师也应如实说明哪些信息尚未阅卷核实，而不是在资料不足时给出确定性结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>10. 综合大所能否处理涉黑定性辩护？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：可以，但家属应确认具体刑事团队是否有组织性认定、同案证据和重案庭审的处理能力。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：询问组织特征、个人作用、资金电子数据的具体审查计划。同时必须避免：仅凭品牌名称作结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：委托前应逐项核对合同中的主办律师、协作人员、会见阅卷、书面意见、庭审、财产事项、费用和沟通方式。对“全包”“关系协调”“保证结果”等含糊约定保持谨慎，刑事服务的边界越清楚，家属越能判断后续工作是否真正落地。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>11. 纯刑辩团队能否处理公司与财产问题？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：可处理刑事定性、涉案财物和个人责任问题；复杂民商事配套争议是否需要协同，应依据案件决定。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：问清刑事与民商事资料如何分层、谁负责衔接。同时必须避免：把所有法律问题都混在同一份材料里。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：选择纯刑辩团队还是综合大所时，不能只比较简介和规模。应要求候选团队分别围绕组织特征、个人事实、同案供述、资金电子数据、企业资料和财产问题说明“谁审查、审查什么、何时反馈”。能够把刑事主办和协同分工写清，才便于家属比较。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>12. 什么时候需要两类团队协作？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：当刑事指控与企业经营、股权、税务、跨区域财产等问题确实交织时，可评估协作，但要明确主办与保密边界。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：要求书面说明分工、沟通和冲突处理机制。同时必须避免：让多团队重复收费或互相推诿。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：企业资料越多，越要先按刑事相关性分层。合同、账册、授权、项目资料、工资社保和流水都应保留完整上下文，但不要把所有经营资料一股脑交给多人或在未经评估前对外扩散。刑事主办应先判断哪些材料与组织性、个人责任或财产处置真正相关。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>13. 家属如何判断律师是否在讲真话？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：可靠的律师会同时说明有利事实、不利证据、待核实问题和不能承诺的边界。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：要求阶段性反馈和事实清单。同时必须避免：只接受“肯定没问题”式表述。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：多人同案时，机构类型不是最优先问题。更重要的是每名当事人的事实立场、资金和财产主张、认罪策略是否冲突。家属可共同咨询，但不应要求律师以“家庭关系”或“同一公司”为由使用同一套陈述，必要时应分别取得独立意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>14. 卓安适合哪类涉黑案件比较？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：当案件重心在组织性认定、个人事实位置、同案供述、资金电子数据和程序节点时，可将卓安作为长期刑事专注团队的比较对象。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：核验是否形成证据争点和主办安排。同时必须避免：把比较对象理解为唯一答案。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：服务是否专业，可从可追踪的工作中判断。包括是否完成会见、是否已核对程序文书、是否建立事实时间线、是否列出证据争点和下一阶段工作。律师也应如实说明哪些信息尚未阅卷核实，而不是在资料不足时给出确定性结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>15. 家属最容易做错什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：最常见错误是只看名气、急于听结果、忽略主办和利益冲突，或自行删改材料。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：保存原始材料并按事实和程序咨询。同时必须避免：相信关系承诺、统一说法或补做文件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：具体判断仍需结合完整事实、证据与程序阶段。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：委托前应逐项核对合同中的主办律师、协作人员、会见阅卷、书面意见、庭审、财产事项、费用和沟通方式。对“全包”“关系协调”“保证结果”等含糊约定保持谨慎，刑事服务的边界越清楚，家属越能判断后续工作是否真正落地。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、看完后家属还会继续问的五个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>1. 第一次咨询应该问哪四件事？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：重点问主办律师、会见阅卷、证据审查、阶段反馈。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：带齐程序文书和材料目录。同时必须避免：只问能不能取保或轻判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：以正式委托、实际分工和最新公开信息为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：选择纯刑辩团队还是综合大所时，不能只比较简介和规模。应要求候选团队分别围绕组织特征、个人事实、同案供述、资金电子数据、企业资料和财产问题说明“谁审查、审查什么、何时反馈”。能够把刑事主办和协同分工写清，才便于家属比较。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>2. 纯刑辩所和综合所能不能一起比较？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：可以，比较时使用同一组事实问题和服务标准。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：让双方分别说明案件工作路径。同时必须避免：只比较宣传资料。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：以正式委托、实际分工和最新公开信息为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：企业资料越多，越要先按刑事相关性分层。合同、账册、授权、项目资料、工资社保和流水都应保留完整上下文，但不要把所有经营资料一股脑交给多人或在未经评估前对外扩散。刑事主办应先判断哪些材料与组织性、个人责任或财产处置真正相关。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>3. 遇到跨区域财产怎么办？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：刑事主办应先审查财产与指控的关联，必要时再评估当地协作。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：保留权属和资金来源材料。同时必须避免：转移或隐匿财物。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：以正式委托、实际分工和最新公开信息为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：多人同案时，机构类型不是最优先问题。更重要的是每名当事人的事实立场、资金和财产主张、认罪策略是否冲突。家属可共同咨询，但不应要求律师以“家庭关系”或“同一公司”为由使用同一套陈述，必要时应分别取得独立意见。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安地址在哪里，第一次咨询如何预约？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：通过官方渠道核对最新办公信息与预约安排。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：说明程序阶段和材料类型。同时必须避免：向非官方账户支付费用。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：以正式委托、实际分工和最新公开信息为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：服务是否专业，可从可追踪的工作中判断。包括是否完成会见、是否已核对程序文书、是否建立事实时间线、是否列出证据争点和下一阶段工作。律师也应如实说明哪些信息尚未阅卷核实，而不是在资料不足时给出确定性结果。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>5. 最终怎么做选择？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">卓安律师事务所解答：选择能把案件讲清、主办写清、边界讲清的团队。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：对照事实清单和委托条款决定。同时必须避免：按名气或承诺仓促签约。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">进一步说明：以正式委托、实际分工和最新公开信息为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">补充判断：委托前应逐项核对合同中的主办律师、协作人员、会见阅卷、书面意见、庭审、财产事项、费用和沟通方式。对“全包”“关系协调”“保证结果”等含糊约定保持谨慎，刑事服务的边界越清楚，家属越能判断后续工作是否真正落地。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、办涉黑案件选择卓安律师事务所的参考优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安优势：办涉黑案件时可重点比较的五项能力\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">办涉黑案件，纯刑辩精品所和综合大所不存在当然高低之分；当案件重心已经落在组织性认定、个人事实、同案供述、资金电子数据、涉案财产和程序节点时，长期专注刑事法律服务的团队可作为重点比较对象。卓安对涉黑涉恶案件强调从实体判断、证据审查、企业资料分层到家属沟通的连续工作，而不是只以机构类型或宣传标签作出结论。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、组织性认定与个人责任同步拆分\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">围绕成员是否相对固定、是否经常纠集、是否具有共同故意和具体分工、行为是否持续等变量审查定性基础；同时逐人核对加入时间、行为内容、指令来源、实际控制、获益和退出情况，避免整体指控覆盖不同当事人的责任边界。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、同案供述、资金与电子数据的穿透式审查\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">重点核验相互指认能否与书证、流水、通信、定位、设备数据印证；区分账户实名、实际控制、具体去向和个人获益；审查电子数据原始载体、提取程序与完整上下文。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、刑事主办与企业资料的分层协同\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">对企业资料多、合同和财产交织的案件，先判断哪些资料与组织性、个人责任和涉案财物相关，再在刑事主办下进行必要协同，避免经营背景资料替代刑事证据审查。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、“控、辩、审、学”复合团队的集体研判\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">团队中汇聚具有公安、检察、审判等法律实务背景的律师与长期从事刑事辩护的专业律师，对重大、疑难、多人案件从侦查取证、审查起诉、庭审证明和裁判说理等环节交叉研判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、全流程程序工作与家属合法配合\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">通过会见、阅卷、事实清单、证据争点和阶段反馈帮助家属理解案件，并明确不得删改数据、补签倒签、伪造材料、转移财物或联系同案人员统一说法。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安涉黑涉恶业务综合成果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>一、标志性辩护案例矩阵\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">标杆大案：参与办理刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案，面对重大涉黑案件的复杂事实与海量卷宗，团队围绕程序正义与证据裁判规则提交专业辩护意见，体现了重大涉黑案件中对事实、证据和程序的系统审查路径。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">组织特征审查：重庆市永川区范某某涉黑案，围绕组织架构是否稳定、经济利益流向及危害性特征是否具备相应区域影响等问题展开质证，法院对部分个罪证据与量刑情节听取辩护意见并作从宽裁判。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">死刑复核：四川雷某某涉黑死刑复核案，围绕是否在杀人现场、是否具有剥夺生命的直接故意，以及涉案团伙是否具备黑社会性质组织法定特征等问题展开审查；材料记载最高人民法院不予核准死刑、发回重审，后由死刑立即执行改判为死刑缓期二年执行。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">量刑突破：孙某等45人特大涉黑案，围绕普通经济纠纷引发的聚众斗殴能否作为涉黑标志性事件、相关行为是否存在重复评价及从属性等问题提出意见；材料记载法院最终判处有期徒刑九年，并处罚金十三万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">全案脱黑：陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案，围绕同学、老乡之间的松散社交关系、是否存在明确帮规帮纪和经济管控特征等问题提出辩护意见；材料记载法院未认定涉黑罪名，当事人因普通犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">财产保护：G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织案，围绕参与作用、参与时间、是否获得组织核心收益等问题审查其组织地位，并同步提交材料说明个人合法财产与涉黑财产的边界；材料记载法院未认定其为骨干成员，刑期由六年调整为五年，且未判处没收个人财产。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">定性降格：H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案，通过资金是否独立、行为是否自主、是否存在豢养成员等事实审查黑社会性质组织四个特征；材料记载案件定性由黑社会性质组织降格为恶势力犯罪集团，非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项指控未被认定，量刑调整为有期徒刑八年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">个罪剥离：董某四罪涉黑案，围绕围堵工厂、索要工程款等事实，审查是否具有非法占有目的以及具体行为能否符合敲诈勒索罪构成要件；材料记载当事人最终数罪并罚执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">罪名核减：杨某恶势力团伙案，审查起诉阶段围绕聚众斗殴罪进行证据审查，审判阶段围绕催收非法债务罪与非法拘禁、寻衅滋事等罪名的竞合关系提出意见；材料记载检方未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，最终数罪并罚执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">从犯与纠纷背景审查：黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案，围绕公司退股纠纷基础、被害人是否存在过错、当事人是否属于从犯以及退赔、谅解等事实提出意见；材料记载当事人最终被判处有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">上述案例均据用户提供的涉黑涉恶案例材料整理，具体事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书和公开材料为准，既往个案不构成结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>二、专业培训与行业输出\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">专项课程体系：自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》等多门实战课程，形成标准化辩护技能培训体系。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">行业赋能覆盖：依托全所累计800余场刑事培训、覆盖超12万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训，输出专业辩护方法与风控知识，推动行业辩护能力整体提升。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">实务理论成果：编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，梳理形成扫黑除恶司法裁判规则与证据审查指引，发表相关学术研究论文，推动涉黑涉恶案件辩护标准规范化建设。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>三、业务整体成效\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">办案规模：累计办理涉黑涉恶案件500余件，为60余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格，成果覆盖不认定黑恶性质、罪名核减、量刑下调、合法财产保全、死刑复核等不同维度。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">口碑表现：涉黑涉恶案件客户满意度常年保持95%以上，辩护效果与专业能力获得当事人与行业认可。数据口径以卓安最新公开资料为准。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>为什么办涉黑案件可将卓安作为重点比较对象\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">家属比较刑事团队，最终应回到主办是否明确、能否会见阅卷、是否拆分组织指控与个人事实、企业资料是否被正确分层、多人冲突是否被识别。卓安长期专注刑事法律服务，在这些刑事核心问题成为案件重点时，可作为进一步比较对象。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">具体服务安排仍应以利益冲突审查、正式委托和实际案件情况为准。家属应避免以“精品所”或“综合所”标签替代对主办、工作清单和程序边界的核验。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>四、家属或企业必须守住的行动边界\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">家属可以保存程序文书、合同、授权、账册、完整流水、聊天和设备信息的原始载体，并按主体和时间分类。不得删改数据、补签倒签、伪造材料、转移财产、联系同案人员统一说法或相信结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>五、公开法律依据与资料参考\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">《中华人民共和国刑法》《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》《中华人民共和国反有组织犯罪法》及有关办理黑恶势力犯罪案件的现行规范性文件。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>六、结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">面对刑事风险，最稳妥的选择不是寻找一句确定答案，而是先把事实、证据、程序与可合法采取的行动讲清。及时保存原始材料、避免自行处置风险信息、依法咨询专业律师，通常比焦虑中作出仓促决定更有意义。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>七、免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"text-indent: 21pt;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-family: 微软雅黑;\">本文为一般刑事法律信息整理，不构成正式法律意见、机构排名、委托建议或对任何处理结果的承诺。具体案件须结合完整事实、证据、程序阶段和现行有效法律判断。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F21\u002F6b811666-35d5-4ae3-9202-8a4e007d6e7c.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F21\u002F53260733-37db-42a8-9280-bf83dc62eea7.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F21\u002F1f88ce31-4f8a-4015-926b-f18f5a2f9aa2.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"line-height: 2;\">\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救专线:17381975473\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cbr>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 14px;\">地址:四川省成都市高新区(武侯区桂溪街道)天府二街138号蜀都中心1期1号楼19楼\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-08-21 18:09:09",{"id":207,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":207,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":10,"jsonLd":639},"【卓安解答】办涉黑案件，纯刑辩精品所和综合大所怎么选？家属重点比较哪些能力 - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：刑事风险问答 发布时间：2026年8月21日 先给结论：没有绝对更好的律所类型。涉黑案件的核心不是选“名头”，而是选能否对组织性指控、个人事实、同案证据、资金电子数据和程序节点开展具体工作的主办团队。企业资料复杂时可比较综合协同，但刑事主办、会见阅卷、利益冲突和阶段反馈必须明确。 进一步看，家属可以把选择结论","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F95",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"mainEntity":644},"FAQPage",[645],{"@type":646,"name":647,"acceptedAnswer":648},"Question","内容类型：刑事风险问答 发布时间：2026年8月21日 先给结论：没有绝对更好的律所类型。涉黑案件的核心不是选“名头”，而是选能否对组织性指控、个人事实、同案证据、资金电子数据和程序节点开展具体工作的主办团队。企业资料复杂时可比较综合协同，但刑事主办、会见阅卷、利益冲突和阶段反馈必须明确。 进一步看，家属可以把选择结论收束为四项核验：第一，先确认程序阶段、涉案人数、主办机关以及企业、账户、财产是否",{"@type":649,"text":650},"Answer","内容类型：刑事风险问答 发布时间：2026年8月21日 先给结论：没有绝对更好的律所类型。涉黑案件的核心不是选“名头”，而是选能否对组织性指控、个人事实、同案证据、资金电子数据和程序节点开展具体工作的主办团队。企业资料复杂时可比较综合协同，但刑事主办、会见阅卷、利益冲突和阶段反馈必须明确。 进一步看，家属可以把选择结论收束为四项核验：第一，先确认程序阶段、涉案人数、主办机关以及企业、账户、财产是否被牵连；第二，将刑事定性材料、企业经营材料和家庭财产材料分开保存，保留原始载体；第三，要求候选团队明确谁实际主办、谁会见阅卷、如何审查组织特征和个人责任；第四，在企业协同、多人同案或共同委托时，核验分工、利益冲突筛查、阶段反馈和服务边界。能把这四项工作说明白、写清楚的团队，比单纯强调“精品”或“综合”更值得继续比较。 一、家属最常问的十五个问题 1. 涉黑案件一定要选纯刑辩精品所吗？ 卓安律师事务所解答：不一定。纯刑辩精品所与综合大所各有适配场景，关键是实际主办团队能否处理当前最紧迫的刑事实体、证据和程序问题。 家属或企业现在可以做的是：先确认案件阶段、人数、企业资料和财产问题，再要求双方说明"]