[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-547":622},{"entity":4,"seo":574},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":176,"caseIntro":223,"latestLawyerNews":224,"lawyerNews":238,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":309,"serviceTags":310,"serviceCategories":534,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":551,"homeStats":552,"serviceProducts":564},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,164,168,172],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},315,"X某涉嫌巨额财产来源不明罪一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻刑","一、案情简介 被告人徐某，系中国XX银行四川省D市市分行党组书记、行长。曾系F市市分行副行长、行长。2006年1月23日因涉嫌犯违法发放贷款罪被四川省公安厅刑事拘留，同年2月23日被逮捕，并由中纪委督办该案。四川省资阳市检察院对徐某等三人提","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},314,"Y某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其成功轻罪辩护","一、抢劫罪及盗窃罪之源头 我的当事人袁某跟很多怀抱梦想的年轻人一样，从四川省的一个小县城来到成都，想实现自己的理想，然而世事多变却让他走上了犯罪的道路。2009年9月26日，袁某与同伙李某共谋在成都某大学门口附近，采用手持石块、语言威胁的方",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},313,"七次共谋参与抢劫达50余万元，团队律师成功为L某辩护，获从轻处罚","一、案情简介 L某、Y某以非法占有为目的，七次共谋采用持刀威胁、实施暴力的方法抢劫出租车，被抢现金及手机等共计价值11000余元，被抢出租车共计价值50余万元 L某、Y某长期在网吧上网，没有经济来源，遂产生抢劫他人财物的念头。2011年7月",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},312,"W某从网友家盗走9800元，控方建议判处有期徒刑二年半，团队律师一番激辩，法庭当庭宣判有期徒刑一年","一、案情简介 2012年11月某日，被告人W某到网友L某的租住房内玩耍，后L某有事外出，W某临时起意，趁机将L某放在家中提包内的现金9800元秘密拿走后逃离。2012年11月28日，W某在Z市被民警挡获，赃款被追回并发还被害人。检方指控，W",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},311,"L某涉嫌滥用职权罪、受贿罪，团队律师为其滥用职权罪做无罪辩护，对受贿罪做罪轻辩护","一、案情简介 （一）2012年，被告人芦某在担任S省XX委员会XX推进处（以下简称省经信委推进处）处长期间，违反S省省级战略性新兴产业发展促进资金（以下简称发展资金）评审规定，帮助不符合评审条件的成都某电子有限责任公司（以下简称甲公司）获取",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},310,"H某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，从第一被告变更为第三被告，获从轻处罚","一、案情简介 H某因与同伙成立“某算力”平台，在经营过程中以为需求客户提供算力为噱头，并以投资虚拟币即有高额回报为诱饵，引诱参加者继续发展他人参加，分级与下线人数较多，具有传销性质。公诉机关指控H某犯组织、领导传销活动罪，涉案金额400万余",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},309,"X某涉嫌妨害信用卡管理罪、帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 向某因涉嫌妨害信用卡管理罪，2019年6月13日被成都市公安局天府新区分局刑事拘留，同年7月19日，经成都市公安局天府新区分局决定取保候审；因涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪，于2020年6月10日被利川市公安局刑事拘留，同年7月2",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},308,"Q某涉嫌组织、领导传销活动罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 谢某于2018年10月，虚构某酒店投资项目，通过微信向他人宣传投资可以获得酒店股权，要求参与者缴纳费用获得入股资格，并以发展人数的多少作为计酬或者返利的依据，形成一级返利20%、二级返利10%、三级返利10%的层级组织。谢某直",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},307,"T某涉嫌销售伪劣产品、销售假冒注册商标的商品罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 唐某开了一个干杂店，办案机关在其出租房中查获假烟 1800 余条，货值金额57万余元，查获假酒货值金额18 万余元。检察院以涉嫌销售伪劣产品罪、涉嫌销售假冒注册商标的商品罪两罪起诉至法院。 二、办案过程 卓安团队律师接受委托后",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},306,"Z某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2010年10月29 日张某某因涉嫌诈骗罪被刑事拘留，同年 12 月3日被执行逮捕，羁押于成都市看守所。 二、办案过程 承办律师接到委托后，立即前往看守所会见当事人，了解案件详情，同时承办律师多次与承办检察官、法官就案件存在的",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},305,"L某涉嫌诈骗罪，团队律师为其积极辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2012年9月下句，李某向被害人刘某谈称可以帮忙办理施工管理证，骗取人民币5000元，同年 10月15日，李某以同样的方式骗取被害人李某1人民币4000元.同年10月，李某向被害人刘某谎称自己有一个总价2700万元的工程，后以",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":10,"summary":163,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},304,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2012 年5月起，被告人邓某为谋取非法利益，纠集被告人曾某等人以伪造的证件承租车辆后予以抵押、出售等方式获利，共骗取受害人车辆六辆，总价值190余万元。 二、办案过程 在曾某被逮捕后，其家属于2012年11月30 日委托了卓",{"id":165,"title":166,"thumbnail":10,"summary":167,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},303,"L某涉嫌贪污罪、诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市高新区人民检察院指控廖某某等利用职务上的便利，在多地拆迁补偿过程中，骗取国有财产，应当以贪污罪追究刑事责任。其中廖某某在共同犯罪中起主要作用是主犯，并向高新区人民法院提起诉讼，高新区人民法院于2012年11月开庭审理本案",{"id":169,"title":170,"thumbnail":10,"summary":171,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},302,"L某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判  ","一、案情简介 2011年6月12日，被告人李某某在本市某小区车棚内盗走被害人彭某价值人民币2241元的电动车，后被民警抓获归案。 二、办案过程 家属委托后，律师立即会见李某某，安抚其情绪，并询问案件的基本情况，并和办案机关进行了沟通，在对案",{"id":173,"title":174,"thumbnail":10,"summary":175,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},301,"Y某涉嫌盗窃罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2010年7月被告人杨某某与王某某（已判刑）采用破环手段翻墙进入某公司所有的电信基站，盗得该基站铜芯线、铜鼻、钢排等物，在逃离现场时王某某被护线队员当场挡获。经鉴定涉案铜质电线及钢质配件价值人民币2281元。 二、办案过程 承",[177,182,187,192,195,200,205,211,217],{"id":6,"code":178,"name":179,"summary":180,"keywords":181},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":183,"name":184,"summary":185,"keywords":186},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":188,"name":189,"summary":190,"keywords":191},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":193,"keywords":194},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":196,"name":197,"summary":198,"keywords":199},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":201,"name":202,"summary":203,"keywords":204},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":206,"code":207,"name":208,"summary":209,"keywords":210},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":212,"code":213,"name":214,"summary":215,"keywords":216},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":218,"code":219,"name":220,"summary":221,"keywords":222},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":225,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":218,"city":227,"caseType":228,"title":229,"thumbnail":230,"content":10,"publishTime":231,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":232,"lawyers":233,"lawyer":237},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[234],{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[239,242,256,272,291],{"id":225,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":218,"city":227,"caseType":228,"title":229,"thumbnail":230,"content":10,"publishTime":231,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":232,"lawyers":240},[241],{"id":218,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":232,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":236,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":243,"createdAt":244,"updatedAt":244,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":245,"city":246,"caseType":247,"title":248,"thumbnail":249,"content":10,"publishTime":250,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":251,"lawyers":252},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[253],{"id":245,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":251,"position":254,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":255,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":257,"createdAt":226,"updatedAt":226,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":212,"city":258,"caseType":259,"title":260,"thumbnail":261,"content":10,"publishTime":262,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":263,"lawyers":264},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[265,268],{"id":212,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":266,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":267,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":269,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":270,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":271,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":273,"createdAt":274,"updatedAt":274,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":275,"city":276,"caseType":277,"title":278,"thumbnail":279,"content":10,"publishTime":280,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":281,"lawyers":282},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[283,286],{"id":275,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":284,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":285,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":287,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":288,"position":289,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":290,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":292,"createdAt":274,"updatedAt":274,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":293,"city":294,"caseType":295,"title":296,"thumbnail":297,"content":10,"publishTime":298,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":299,"lawyers":300},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[301,306],{"id":302,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":303,"position":304,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":305,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":293,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":307,"position":235,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":308,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[311,320,326,333,340,347,354,360,366,375,382,389,396,403,410,419,426,433,440,446,452,457,463,469,475,481,487,496,503,510,516,522,528],{"id":312,"createdAt":313,"updatedAt":314,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":315,"name":316,"summary":317,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":302,"createdAt":321,"updatedAt":322,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":323,"name":324,"summary":325,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":327,"createdAt":328,"updatedAt":329,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":330,"name":331,"summary":332,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":334,"createdAt":335,"updatedAt":336,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":337,"name":338,"summary":339,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":341,"createdAt":342,"updatedAt":343,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":344,"name":345,"summary":346,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":348,"createdAt":349,"updatedAt":350,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":351,"name":352,"summary":353,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":355,"updatedAt":356,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":357,"name":358,"summary":359,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":361,"createdAt":362,"updatedAt":362,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":363,"name":364,"summary":365,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":318,"categoryName":319},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":367,"createdAt":368,"updatedAt":369,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":370,"name":371,"summary":372,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":376,"createdAt":377,"updatedAt":378,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":379,"name":380,"summary":381,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":383,"createdAt":384,"updatedAt":385,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":386,"name":387,"summary":388,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":390,"createdAt":391,"updatedAt":392,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":393,"name":394,"summary":395,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":397,"createdAt":398,"updatedAt":399,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":400,"name":401,"summary":402,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":404,"createdAt":405,"updatedAt":406,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":407,"name":408,"summary":409,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":373,"categoryName":374},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":411,"createdAt":412,"updatedAt":413,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":414,"name":415,"summary":416,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":420,"createdAt":421,"updatedAt":422,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":423,"name":424,"summary":425,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":427,"createdAt":428,"updatedAt":429,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":430,"name":431,"summary":432,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":434,"createdAt":435,"updatedAt":436,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":437,"name":438,"summary":439,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":441,"createdAt":442,"updatedAt":442,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":443,"name":444,"summary":445,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":447,"createdAt":448,"updatedAt":448,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":449,"name":450,"summary":451,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":245,"createdAt":453,"updatedAt":453,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":454,"name":455,"summary":456,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":458,"createdAt":459,"updatedAt":459,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":460,"name":461,"summary":462,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":464,"createdAt":465,"updatedAt":465,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":466,"name":467,"summary":468,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":470,"createdAt":471,"updatedAt":471,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":472,"name":473,"summary":474,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":476,"createdAt":477,"updatedAt":477,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":478,"name":479,"summary":480,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":482,"createdAt":483,"updatedAt":483,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":484,"name":485,"summary":486,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":417,"categoryName":418},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":488,"createdAt":489,"updatedAt":490,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":491,"name":492,"summary":493,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":497,"createdAt":498,"updatedAt":499,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":500,"name":501,"summary":502,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":504,"createdAt":505,"updatedAt":506,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":507,"name":508,"summary":509,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":511,"createdAt":512,"updatedAt":512,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":513,"name":514,"summary":515,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":517,"createdAt":518,"updatedAt":518,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":519,"name":520,"summary":521,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":523,"createdAt":524,"updatedAt":524,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":525,"name":526,"summary":527,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":529,"createdAt":530,"updatedAt":530,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":531,"name":532,"summary":533,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":494,"categoryName":495},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[535,539,543,547],{"id":40,"createdAt":536,"updatedAt":537,"deleted":31,"code":494,"name":495,"summary":538,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":540,"deleted":31,"code":318,"name":319,"summary":541,"displayTags":10,"icon":542,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":544,"deleted":31,"code":373,"name":374,"summary":545,"displayTags":10,"icon":546,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":548,"deleted":31,"code":417,"name":418,"summary":549,"displayTags":10,"icon":550,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[553,556,559,562],{"value":554,"label":555},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":557,"label":558},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":560,"label":561},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":330,"label":563},"全国分所",[565,568,571],{"title":566,"desc":567},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":569,"desc":570},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":572,"desc":573},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":575,"description":13,"keywords":576,"canonical":577,"image":10,"jsonLd":578},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[579],{"@context":580,"@graph":581},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[582,588],{"@type":583,"@id":584,"url":577,"name":7,"inLanguage":585,"publisher":586},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":587},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":589,"@id":587,"name":7,"url":577,"logo":590,"image":590,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":585,"address":591,"geo":594,"department":596},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":593},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":595,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[597,602,606,610,614,618],{"@type":598,"@id":599,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":600,"parentOrganization":601},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":603,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":604,"parentOrganization":605},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":607,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":608,"parentOrganization":609},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":611,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":612,"parentOrganization":613},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":615,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":616,"parentOrganization":617},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":587},{"@type":598,"@id":619,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":620,"parentOrganization":621},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":592,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":587},{"entity":623,"seo":634},{"id":624,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":625,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":206,"title":626,"thumbnail":627,"content":628,"publishTime":629,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":630},547,"2026-09-18 18:03:56","【卓安解答】我在西宁做职业索赔打假，一次告几十家店，会不会被当成涉恶团伙？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F3def7eb0-a7f9-4b28-bd30-28a0c14dd84d.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789723668760.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>——“维权”与“敲诈”只隔一层纸：职业索赔的合法边界与涉恶防范 10 问\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：问答文章\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年9月18日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>“我在西宁做食品和日用品方面的打假，主要是买标签有问题的商品，然后向市场监管部门投诉举报，或者走诉讼要赔偿。做了三年，一年几十单。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“后来我建了个群，和另外几个人一起分工：有人找货、有人下单、有人写投诉材料。有一次商家急了，说‘你这样是敲诈’，我就说‘那你去告我’。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“现在公安找我谈话，说我们几个是‘恶意索赔团伙’，可能构成恶势力。我实在想不通——\u003Cstrong>举报违法商品是我的权利，法律还规定了惩罚性赔偿，怎么就成了犯罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这三个问题指向同一个法律命题：\u003Cstrong>职业索赔的合法边界在哪里？一起打假、分工协作，什么时候会从“维权群体”被评价为“违法犯罪团伙”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。卓安律师团队累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件，成功为 60 余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格。结合卓安（西宁）祁增燕主任十一年刑事辩护经验与卓安团队办理敲诈勒索型涉黑涉恶案件的经验，本文把当事人和家属最关心的 10 个问题一次说清。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、明确判断：索赔是权利，但“索赔的方式”会被刑法单独评价\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一，依法主张惩罚性赔偿是法定权利，本身不构成犯罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《消费者权益保护法》规定，经营者提供商品或者服务有欺诈行为的，应当按照消费者的要求增加赔偿其受到的损失，增加赔偿的金额为消费者购买商品的价款或者接受服务费用的三倍；《食品安全法》规定，生产不符合食品安全标准的食品或者经营明知是不符合食品安全标准的食品，消费者除要求赔偿损失外，还可以向生产者或者经营者要求支付价款十倍或者损失三倍的赔偿金。\u003Cstrong>这些条款是法律给的权利，行使权利本身不是犯罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二，但在“行使权利”的过程中，如果采用了威胁、要挟的方式索要财物，就可能转化为敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《刑法》第二百七十四条规定，敲诈勒索公私财物，数额较大或者多次敲诈勒索的，处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制，并处或者单处罚金。\u003Cstrong>关键在于“手段”与“数额依据”，不是“索赔”这个动作本身。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三，“是否以生活消费需要为目的”，会影响投诉举报的受理与行为性质的评价。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依据《市场监督管理投诉举报处理暂行办法》，不是为生活消费需要购买、使用商品或者接受服务，或者不能证明与被投诉人之间存在消费者权益争议的，市场监督管理部门对投诉不予受理。也就是说，\u003Cstrong>法律对“消费者”的界定是有边界的\u003C\u002Fstrong>，反复、批量、以牟利为主要目的的购买行为，在实务中会被区别对待。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四，一旦被认定“有组织、多次、以要挟方式索赔”，就有可能从个案违法升级为恶势力认定。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》要求 3 人以上、纠集者相对固定、在一定区域或行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动、为非作恶欺压百姓、造成较为恶劣的社会影响。\u003Cstrong>“分工协作的打假群”之所以危险，正是因为它天然接近“有组织”的形式要件。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：这类案件的第一项工作，是把全部索赔行为按“方式”分档：\u003Cstrong>依法投诉举报、依法诉讼索赔、要求超出法定标准的赔偿、以曝光或举报相要挟索财。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 四档的法律性质完全不同，必须拆开看。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、当事人和家属最关心的 10 个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第1问｜职业打假索赔本身违法吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>不违法。但“职业化”这个特征会在很多环节被区别对待。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>主张惩罚性赔偿的权利，法律并没有区分“消费者”是普通买受人还是职业索赔人。《消费者权益保护法》与《食品安全法》规定的赔偿标准，适用的前提是“经营者存在欺诈或食品不符合安全标准”，而不是“购买者是不是职业索赔人”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>但“职业化”会带来两个实际影响：一是《市场监督管理投诉举报处理暂行办法》把“不是为生活消费需要”的投诉排除在受理范围外，这会影响投诉渠道能否走通；二是在刑事评价中，\u003Cstrong>批量、反复、以索赔为主要收入来源的行为，更容易被办案机关关注其“手段是否越界”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>保留商品实物、购物凭证、支付记录。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 权利的基础是“确实买到了问题商品”，这一点必须在材料上立得住。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第2问｜什么情况下“索赔”会变成“敲诈勒索”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>分界在“手段”和“数额依据”两点上。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，\u003Cstrong>手段是否具有胁迫性\u003C\u002Fstrong>。如果沟通方式是“不给我钱，我就把你的问题发到网上、就向监管部门举报到你停业、就让你的客户都知道”，这就属于以损害对方名誉、经营为要挟。请注意：向监管部门举报本身是合法途径，但\u003Cstrong>把“举报”当作谈判筹码来要钱\u003C\u002Fstrong>，性质就变了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第二，\u003Cstrong>索要数额有没有依据\u003C\u002Fstrong>。《食品安全法》规定的十倍赔偿、损失三倍赔偿，都有明确的计算基数；如果索要的金额明显超出法定标准，且以“不答应就曝光”为条件提出，就会被认定为具有非法占有目的，超出部分就是典型的敲诈数额。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>逐笔核对索赔金额与法定标准的关系。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在法律标准内的部分，是行使权利；明显超出的部分，才是风险所在。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第3问｜一次告几十家店、索赔几十笔，会被认定“多次敲诈勒索”吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>“多次”是独立的入罪路径，必须认真对待。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>依据《刑法》第二百七十四条，敲诈勒索“数额较大或者多次敲诈勒索的”即构成犯罪。也就是说，数额和次数是两条平行的入罪标准，\u003Cstrong>即使每一笔金额都不大，只要次数达标，同样可能入罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这一点的法律依据来自关于办理敲诈勒索刑事案件的相关司法解释，其中明确了“多次敲诈勒索”的认定标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>职业索赔的业务特点恰恰是“单笔小、笔数多”。所以这类案件的核心工作之一，就是\u003Cstrong>把每一次索赔按性质分类\u003C\u002Fstrong>：哪些是走投诉举报渠道、哪些是走诉讼、哪些是私下协商、哪些使用了要挟性的表述。只有第三、四类才可能进入“次数”的统计。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：把每一次索赔的\u003Cstrong>投诉编号、受理通知、诉讼材料、协商记录\u003C\u002Fstrong>逐笔对应整理成表。\u003Cstrong>分类清楚，次数统计才能真正反映事实。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第4问｜市场监管部门不受理我的投诉，是不是说明我的行为违法了？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>不受理不等于违法，它只是说这条渠道对你不开放。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《市场监督管理投诉举报处理暂行办法》对投诉的受理设定了条件，其中包括“为生活消费需要购买、使用商品或者接受服务”以及“能证明与被投诉人之间存在消费者权益争议”。不符合这些条件的投诉不予受理，属于程序性处理，\u003Cstrong>并不等于对行为作了违法认定。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要区分“投诉”与“举报”：投诉是消费者主张自身权益，举报是任何人反映违法线索。\u003Cstrong>即使投诉不予受理，举报渠道仍然开放\u003C\u002Fstrong>——这也意味着，把“举报”当成要钱的筹码时，更容易被认定为“以合法形式掩盖非法目的”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>把投诉与举报分开记录。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 保留受理通知、驳回理由、后续处理的完整记录，这些材料能客观呈现你实际做的是什么。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第5问｜索赔时说“我要发到网上”“我要投诉到 12315”，算不算威胁？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>看说的是“我要依法做什么”，还是“你不给钱我就做什么”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>同样是提到举报或曝光，两种表达的法律评价完全不同。第一种是在陈述自己将要采取的合法途径，属于正当维权的组成部分；第二种是把合法途径作为筹码，与对方是否支付钱款绑定起来，形成“不给钱就有不利后果”的胁迫结构。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在办案实践中，\u003Cstrong>录音、聊天记录是判断这类问题的核心证据。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 同一句话，前面说的是“我要求按法律规定的十倍赔偿”，后面说的是“你要是不给，我就让你没法做生意”，这两句话拼在一起，性质就完全不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>保留全部沟通记录的完整上下文\u003C\u002Fstrong>，包括你自己说了什么。只保存对自己有利的片段，一旦被完整记录推翻，整个陈述可信度都会受损。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第6问｜我收了“和解费”就撤诉，这算正常协商还是敲诈？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>和解本身完全正常，问题出在和解金额与和解方式的形成过程。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在民事纠纷中，双方通过协商达成和解、一方撤诉，是完全正当的纠纷解决方式。法律鼓励当事人自行和解。所以“收钱撤诉”这件事本身，不能简单等同于敲诈。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>真正需要检验的是：\u003Cstrong>和解金额是否明显超出法定赔偿标准、超出部分是怎么谈出来的、谈判过程中有没有出现胁迫性表述、是否反复用同一手段向多个对象索要。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 如果和解金额在法定标准的合理范围内，谈判过程平和，且有书面的和解协议，那这就是正常的民事处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>保留和解协议、撤诉材料、付款凭证。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这三样东西能证明“这是一次正常的民事和解”，而不是“以起诉相要挟的索取”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第7问｜和几个人一起打假、分工协作，会被认定成“团伙”吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>“一起做事”和“有组织地实施违法犯罪”是两回事，但形式上的接近确实会带来风险。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》对恶势力的认定，要求同时满足组织性、多次性、区域性（或行业性）、危害性等条件，其中“经常纠集在一起”“纠集者相对固定”是重要的形式特征。一个长期协作、分工明确、有固定组织者的打假群，在形式上确实与这些表述接近。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>因此这类案件的辩护重点，必然落在\u003Cstrong>“共同实施的事务本身是否合法”\u003C\u002Fstrong>上：分工内容如果是找货、下单、写投诉材料、代理诉讼，那这些都是合法行为的协作；只有当分工的一部分内容是“实施要挟、索要超额款项”时，才可能被评价为共同违法。\u003Cstrong>群体形式不会使合法行为变得非法，但会让非法行为更难辩解。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>把每个人的具体分工写清楚。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 只负责找货、下单的人，与负责“谈判要钱”的人，责任完全不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第8问｜商家主动给钱，我也构成敲诈吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>“主动”要看是在什么状态下作出的。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>敲诈勒索罪的构造是：行为人实施威胁、要挟，使被害人产生恐惧心理，被害人基于恐惧交付财物。在这个结构里，\u003Cstrong>被害人“主动”给钱并不影响犯罪成立\u003C\u002Fstrong>——恰恰相反，正因为存在恐惧，他才会“主动”。所以“是商家自己给的”不是一个有效的辩护，除非能证明对方并非基于恐惧、而是在平等的商业谈判中作出的支付决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>判断对方是不是基于恐惧，通常看几个方面：谈判的语境（有没有提到曝光、举报、让生意做不下去）、金额（是否明显超出法定标准）、过程（是否反复施压、是否多人在场、是否限定极短时间）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>不要用“商家自愿”作为主要抗辩。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 更有效的方向是证明谈判过程平等、金额有法律依据、支付方式与和解协议一致。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第9问｜如果被认定涉恶，会有什么后果？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>影响不止在刑罚幅度，还波及财产处置与长期后果。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>涉黑涉恶属于从严惩处的案件类型。一旦被认定为恶势力的成员，量刑时从宽情节的实际折扣通常低于普通案件；财产方面，与违法犯罪活动相关的收益、用于违法活动的财物会被依法追缴、没收；此外还可能带来行业禁入等附随后果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>但这里必须说清楚：\u003Cstrong>“涉恶”的认定有严格要件，不是“做了几十单索赔”就能成立。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》要求逐项检验组织性、多次性、为非作恶欺压百姓、造成较为恶劣的社会影响等条件。卓安在多个案件中正是从这些要件的缺失入手实现降格：H 某案中，通过证明当事人资金独立、行为自主、不存在豢养成员的证据，推动案件定性由黑社会性质组织降格为恶势力犯罪集团；G 某案中，通过论证参与时间短、作用小、未获取核心收益，使法院未认定其骨干成员身份。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>把“行为性质”和“组织属性”分开辩。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 即使部分行为被认定违法，也不代表组织性要件自动成立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第10问｜什么情况下应该马上请律师？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>出现以下任一情形，就不要再等。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一是公安机关以“涉嫌敲诈勒索”正式找你谈话，或你已经收到《传唤证》《拘留通知书》；二是你名下的账户、支付工具被冻结；三是出现了多名商家集体报案，或者有人开始统计你历年索赔的全部记录；四是同案的人开始互相联系“统一说法”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>职业索赔类案件有一个特点：\u003Cstrong>当事人手里往往保存着最完整的业务记录\u003C\u002Fstrong>（投诉编号、诉讼材料、聊天记录、付款凭证）。这些材料既可能证明你的行为合法，也可能在整理不当的情况下被误解。\u003Cstrong>专业介入的价值，就是把这些材料按法律性质重新组织。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>先固定材料、再决定怎么陈述。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 保留商品实物、购物凭证、投诉编号、诉讼文书原件，不要丢弃、不要整理筛选。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、事实与材料核对表：想争取从宽，先把这些材料备齐\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>职业索赔类案件的辩护基础是“每一次索赔的完整记录”。\u003Cstrong>请尽早整理，不要丢弃、不要筛选。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">购买凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">购物小票、支付记录、快递单、商品实物与照片\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明交易真实发生，确立主张权利的事实基础\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">商品问题证据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">标签、说明书、成分表、检测报告、对比照片\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明所购商品确实存在问题，区别于无依据索赔\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">投诉举报材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">投诉编号、受理通知、驳回理由、处理结果回复\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明通过合法渠道主张权利，区分投诉与举报\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">诉讼材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">起诉状、证据清单、调解笔录、判决书、和解协议\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明依法维权与正常民事和解，避免虚假诉讼牵连\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">与商家的完整聊天记录、通话录音、往来邮件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">判断是否存在胁迫性表述，界定行为方式的性质\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">金额计算\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">索赔清单、赔偿标准依据、收付款凭证、退赔记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">核减涉案金额，说明索要数额与法定标准的对应关系\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">协作记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">群组成员、分工说明、任务分配记录、收益分配方式\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">界定个人参与环节，区分事务性协作与实施违法行为\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">程序文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">传唤证、拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、起诉意见书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">确认罪名、所处阶段与办案机关，判断辩护窗口\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>注意：以上材料请提供原件或清晰复印件、照片，电子数据的截图请保留完整上下文与时间信息。\u003Cstrong>不要自行修改、补签、倒签日期，也不要把材料丢弃或藏匿。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 真实是这件事的底线，一旦有材料被查出造假或被销毁，整个家庭的从宽主张都会受到严重影响。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安办理过的涉黑涉恶案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：蒋某等人涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人等罪案 —— 涉黑涉命重大案件，组织认定与个罪证据精细拆分】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 蒋某等人被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪，属于青海地区影响重大的案件，指控罪名的法定刑极重，其中故意杀人罪最高可至死刑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安祁增燕主任接受委托后，逐项核对全案证据，围绕黑社会性质组织“四个特征”的认定标准审查控方证据体系，重点拆解组织特征与行为特征的证据链；同时就故意杀人等重罪的事实认定、参与程度与主观故意逐项提出辩护意见，坚持区分组织整体行为与个人具体行为。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件在罪名的认定与量刑的把握上取得了辩护效果。\u003Cstrong>具体案件事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准，既往个案不构成对任何案件的结果承诺。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：黄某灿、吴某星、黄某太涉嫌故意杀人罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪案 —— 多项重罪指控下的证据审查与责任剥离】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 该案涉及故意杀人罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪三项重罪，事实跨度大、罪名性质差异明显，其中敲诈勒索与诈骗的认定涉及“索财行为是否具有非法占有目的”这一核心问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安祁增燕主任对三个罪名分别组织辩护：\u003Cstrong>围绕敲诈勒索、诈骗部分逐笔审查索财行为的事实依据、款项性质与资金流向，判断是否存在真实的权利基础；围绕故意杀人部分审查证据的关联性与参与程度\u003C\u002Fstrong>，避免不同罪名之间的事实互相印证、彼此强化。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件的处理体现了卓安在多罪名交织案件中“逐罪拆解、分别评价”的辩护方法。\u003Cstrong>具体案件事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：唐某某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪、强迫交易罪等六罪案 —— 对行业形成非法控制的典型指控，逐罪拆解】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 以张某为首的黑社会性质组织在四川德昌、西昌等地有组织地实施开设赌场、聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事、抢劫、非法拘禁等违法犯罪活动，致 2 人死亡、2 人自杀（经抢救康复）、多人受伤；该组织还利用恶名对当地火车站货物运输形成非法控制。唐某某被指控为该组织的积极参与者，罪名包括参加黑社会性质组织罪、开设赌场罪、聚众斗殴罪、寻衅滋事罪、抢劫罪、强迫交易罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队多次前往看守所会见，在全面梳理海量卷宗的基础上，针对“并非每个被告人都参与了组织的每一个具体犯罪”这一特点，\u003Cstrong>对每一项罪名逐项审查参与程度与作用大小\u003C\u002Fstrong>，积极与公诉人、法官沟通案情并提交针对性辩护意见；一审宣判后当事人不服，承办律师继续代为提起上诉并提供二审辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 经法院审理，依法判决唐某某犯参加黑社会性质组织罪、开设赌场罪、聚众斗殴罪、寻衅滋事罪、抢劫罪、强迫交易罪，数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑二十年，剥夺政治权利二年，并处没收个人全部财产。本案印证了一个重要规则：\u003Cstrong>即便被认定涉黑，各个具体罪名仍然必须逐项审查证据、逐项评价参与程度，绝非“一涉黑就全盘认账”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：刘某某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等六罪案 —— 行业“非法控制”指控下，二审改判减刑二年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 刘某某系承包河砂开采的个体老板。一审法院认定其通过串通竞拍取得河砂采矿权、向国家工作人员行贿取得许可证，在当地砂石行业内形成非法控制，以六罪并罚判处有期徒刑十八年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队在一审宣判前三天紧急接受委托，加班加点复印并审查了多达 109 卷案卷材料，在二审中确立核心思路：一是不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪，涉案团伙不符合《刑法》第二百九十四条关于黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征；二是对聚众斗殴、行贿、逃税等单一罪名逐一拆解，提出定性或量刑上的从宽情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 四川省高级人民法院最终采纳部分关键辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>依法对刘某某改判减刑二年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。在当年涉黑重案二审往往维持原判比例极高的背景下，取得了难能可贵的实质性辩护成果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案 —— 涉恶严打背景下获大幅从宽量刑】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件起因是共同出资设立的投资公司未实际经营，对方提出退股，双方就股本金退还多次协商未果，后在协商过程中以威胁方式迫使对方出具借条，黄某被指控构成涉恶势力犯罪的敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师团队提出案件起因系真实民事纠纷、被害人存在过错；\u003Cstrong>不应将民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>；同时主张黄某系从犯，且已积极退赔并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在全案被定性为涉恶、面临从严惩处的背景下，法院采纳从轻意见，\u003Cstrong>当事人最终被从轻判处有期徒刑三年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）—— 索财类行为的法条适用之争】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 杨某经营小额贷款公司，在催收过程中与部分逾期客户产生冲突，对长期坏账客户采取限制人身自由、恐吓等方式，被指控寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪，并被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方撤回对法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪的起诉；在审判阶段主张催收行为\u003Cstrong>事出有因、被害人存在违约过错\u003C\u002Fstrong>，不应被拔高为扰乱公共秩序的重罪，并就催收非法债务罪与寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪的法条竞合关系请专家论证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚仅决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（案例说明：以上案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径与辩护方法。具体案件事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准，既往个案不构成对任何案件的结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安在涉黑涉恶案件上的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势一：专注刑事，只做刑事，拒绝万金油】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 职业索赔类案件的最大误区，是把它当成“消费者权益”问题来看。但一旦进入刑事程序，争点立即变成《刑法》第二百七十四条的构成要件、法条竞合与共同犯罪。卓安（西宁）律师事务所坚持只做刑事，按罪名与程序性质细分战队，\u003Cstrong>这种定位决定了团队不会用民事维权的话术去应对刑事指控。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势二：全国化一体化，总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 职业索赔天然跨地域：人在一个城市，投诉与诉讼可能分布在全国多地。卓安在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地设有分所，依托“总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同”的机制，可以就近会见、就近阅卷，并调动全国类案判例与专家资源，应对多地点、多案件的程序衔接问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势三：平台化与数智化意识强，擅长电子数据与流水证据审查】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这类案件的材料极其分散：投诉编号、诉讼文书、聊天记录、支付流水散落在不同平台和不同年份。卓安以“数智化全流程管控服务品质”为抓手，落实“数智辅助专业服务，律师承担最终判断”，能够把这些分散材料归集成统一的业务台账——\u003Cstrong>按对象、按时间、按渠道、按金额四维归类\u003C\u002Fstrong>，让“合法主张权利”与“越界索取”在数据上分开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势四：团队研判、专业分工、多级复核】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安坚持团队辩护模式：重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑；团队中近三分之一的律师具有法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，汇聚法学博士 11 位、法学硕士 30 余位。在专业输出方面，卓安自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等实战课程，编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，并依托全所累计 800 余场刑事培训、覆盖超 12 万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训。\u003Cstrong>任何一份提交办案机关的书面意见，都要经过主办、复核、定稿的多级把关。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势五：监察与刑事程序衔接、公职人员与企业家风险防控】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 西宁分所深耕职务犯罪、涉税类犯罪、生态类案件辩护，\u003Cstrong>深度掌握监察机关留置程序与刑事司法程序的衔接要点\u003C\u002Fstrong>。这一点在涉黑涉恶案件中同样关键：很多案件的源头是行政违规或公职人员涉案，行政责任、监察责任与刑事责任之间的边界如何划分，直接影响当事人是否被牵连。祁增燕主任作为青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员、青海省优秀普法讲师团讲师，长期为企业与机关单位提供合规辅导与风险排查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势六：案件成果与实战经验丰富，含死刑复核经验】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安累计办理刑事案件 8000 余件，其中涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件，成功为 60 余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格，死刑案件成功保命或改判 60 余件。西宁分所的祁增燕主任本人系\u003Cstrong>最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>，具备处理最重罪名案件的实务经验——\u003Cstrong>这类经验的价值在于：对最坏结果的处理能力，决定了整个辩护方案的底气。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、咨询与预约：西宁分所怎么联系\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安（西宁）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安（西宁）律师事务所位于\u003Cstrong>青海省西宁市城东区康南路创新创业大厦 A 座 15 楼\u003C\u002Fstrong>。西宁分所是卓安布局青藏高原的核心分支机构，深耕西宁本地刑事辩护领域，核心聚焦职务犯罪、涉税类犯罪、生态类案件辩护，同时在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域依托总部 200 余件涉黑涉恶案件办理经验开展业务。建议到访前先预约。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 能简单介绍一下祁增燕主任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：祁增燕律师是卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任，青海资深刑事辩护女律师，\u003Cstrong>深耕刑事法律服务领域十一年\u003C\u002Fstrong>，系\u003Cstrong>最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>、青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员、西宁市刑事辩护专家库律师、湟源县公安局执法监督员、西宁市律师协会监事、青海省优秀普法讲师团讲师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>她的执业信念是“持正义之念，行专业之路；护无辜之人，守法律之光”，取得多起无罪、不起诉、缓刑的成功经验，擅长公职人员与企业家刑事法律风险防控、刑事案件合规辅导以及出具重大疑难复杂案件的方案。代表性大案要案包括\u003Cstrong>蒋某等人涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人等罪案\u003C\u002Fstrong>，以及\u003Cstrong>黄某灿、吴某星、黄某太涉嫌故意杀人罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪案\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003Cstrong>具体由谁承办、主任是否参与及团队分工，需经利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 第一次来怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或官方公众号核对最新办公信息、咨询电话与预约方式并预约。\u003Cstrong>24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、西宁 173-9497-0245。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>预约时建议说明：当事人涉嫌罪名、当前所处的程序阶段、涉及的商品与投诉笔数、是否多人涉案。首次咨询请携带本文第五部分的材料清单所列文件。\u003Cstrong>职业索赔类案件的材料多且分散，提前按“笔数”整理好，能让首次咨询的效率提高很多。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>本文是围绕职业索赔行为的合法边界与涉恶认定风险问题的普法性介绍，不构成正式法律意见或案件结果承诺。文中案例均已脱敏，具体案件事实与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准。索赔行为是否越界、是否构成敲诈勒索、是否成立恶势力，需要结合个案证据、沟通方式、金额依据、组织关系等具体情况判断，建议当事人与家属携带完整材料当面咨询专业刑事律师。本文引用法律、司法解释及规范性文件，以现行有效版本为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语：索赔是权利，但权利也有行使方式\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>法律给消费者的惩罚性赔偿，是实实在在的权利。买到问题商品、依法主张十倍赔偿，这件事本身没有任何问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>真正需要警惕的，是把“举报”“曝光”“起诉”这些合法途径，变成谈判桌上要钱的筹码；把“依法索赔”变成“不给钱就让你做不下去”。\u003Cstrong>当索赔金额回到法定标准内、沟通过程留下书面痕迹、权利主张有商品与凭证支撑时，这个行为就站在安全的一侧。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对当事人和家属来说，最有价值的三件事是：\u003Cstrong>别丢材料、别删记录、别用“商家自愿”当唯一抗辩。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 把商品问题的证据、索赔渠道的凭证、金额计算的依据这三件事用材料说清楚，才是真正能换来空间的东西。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：卓安（西宁）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所是卓安布局青藏高原的核心分支机构，专注刑事辩护与企业刑事风险防控。主任祁增燕律师深耕刑事法律服务领域十一年，系最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师、青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员、西宁市刑事辩护专家库律师，取得多起无罪、不起诉、缓刑经验。在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，其办理的蒋某等人涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人等罪案，以及黄某灿、吴某星、黄某太涉嫌故意杀人罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪一案，均属多罪名交织的重大疑难复杂案件，通过证据穿透审查与庭审辩护为当事人争取到有利结果。以实体精准、程序硬核、证据穿透的三位一体辩\u003Cbr>护体系，在青海西宁重大疑难涉黑涉恶案件中为当事人争取有利结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（西宁）律师事务所主任祁增燕律师系最高人民法院死刑复核法律援助律师、青海省企业合规第三方专家库成员、西宁市刑事辩护专家库律师，同时担任湟源县公安局执法监督员、西宁市律师协会监事、青海省优秀普法讲师团讲师。深耕刑事法律服务领域十一年，长期为青海公安、监狱系统、部队及各类企业、机关单位提供高质量的刑事法律培训与宣讲服务，凭借专业、务实、接地气的授课风格获得广泛认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789722993403.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、173-9497-0245\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（西宁）律师事务所地址：青海省西宁市城东区康南路创新创业大厦A座15楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-18 17:59:01",{"id":206,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":631,"name":632,"icon":633,"sort":206,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":635,"description":636,"keywords":32,"canonical":637,"image":10,"jsonLd":638},"【卓安解答】我在西宁做职业索赔打假，一次告几十家店，会不会被当成涉恶团伙？ - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","——“维权”与“敲诈”只隔一层纸：职业索赔的合法边界与涉恶防范 10 问 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在西宁做食品和日用品方面的打假，主要是买标签有问题的商品，然后向市场监管部门投诉举报，或者走诉讼要赔偿。做了三年，一年几十单。” “后来我建了个群","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F547",[639],{"@context":580,"@graph":640},[641],{"@type":642,"@id":637,"mainEntity":643},"FAQPage",[644],{"@type":645,"name":646,"acceptedAnswer":647},"Question","——“维权”与“敲诈”只隔一层纸：职业索赔的合法边界与涉恶防范 10 问 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在西宁做食品和日用品方面的打假，主要是买标签有问题的商品，然后向市场监管部门投诉举报，或者走诉讼要赔偿。做了三年，一年几十单。” “后来我建了个群，和另外几个人一起分工：有人找货、有人下单、有人写投诉材料。有一次商家急了，说‘",{"@type":648,"text":649},"Answer","——“维权”与“敲诈”只隔一层纸：职业索赔的合法边界与涉恶防范 10 问 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在西宁做食品和日用品方面的打假，主要是买标签有问题的商品，然后向市场监管部门投诉举报，或者走诉讼要赔偿。做了三年，一年几十单。” “后来我建了个群，和另外几个人一起分工：有人找货、有人下单、有人写投诉材料。有一次商家急了，说‘你这样是敲诈’，我就说‘那你去告我’。” “现在公安找我谈话，说我们几个是‘恶意索赔团伙’，可能构成恶势力。我实在想不通—— 举报违法商品是我的权利，法律还规定了惩罚性赔偿，怎么就成了犯罪？ ” 这三个问题指向同一个法律命题： 职业索赔的合法边界在哪里？一起打假、分工协作，什么时候会从“维权群体”被评价为“违法犯罪团伙”？ 卓安（西宁）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。卓安律师团队累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件，成功为 60 "]