[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-545":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":207,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},545,"2026-09-18 18:03:52","【卓安解答】我在达州做网络舆情服务，帮客户处理负面帖子，怎么就成了涉恶的网络黑恶团伙？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F237f692f-1120-4267-aa2d-d0861433879e.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789723668760.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>——“有偿删帖”与“合法舆情服务”之间隔着什么：网络黑恶的涉恶认定与软暴力升格 10 问\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：问答文章\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年9月18日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>“我在达州开了家传媒公司，主要做舆情监测和品牌维护。客户被网上发帖了，我们先评估内容是不是失实，然后帮客户找平台申诉、准备律师函、发布澄清声明。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“但有些帖子平台不删，客户着急，我们就私下联系发帖人谈，谈成了给一笔‘撤稿费’。我一开始就觉得不太对，但客户愿意出，发帖人也愿意收，我以为这就是协商。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“现在公司被查了，说我搞‘有偿删帖’、是网络黑恶，还说我这是‘舆情敲诈’。可我从没威胁过谁，是发帖人自己开价要钱的。这也能算犯罪？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这三个问题指向同一个法律命题：\u003Cstrong>网络空间里的“表达”与“交易”，什么时候会被纳入刑法的评价范围？“协商撤稿”与“敲诈勒索”之间，界限究竟在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。卓安律师团队累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件，成功为 60 余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格。结合卓安（达州）张罗主任十三年公安刑侦经验与卓安团队办理涉网型、敲诈勒索型涉黑涉恶案件的经验，本文把当事人和家属最关心的 10 个问题一次说清。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、明确判断：网络不是法外之地，但“发帖”和“删帖”也不是天然有罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一，“有偿删帖”有专门的司法解释对应，不能按一般商业合作理解。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 2013 年最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理利用信息网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第六条明确规定：以在信息网络上发布、删除等方式处理网络信息为由，威胁、要挟他人，索取公私财物，数额较大，或者多次实施上述行为的，依照刑法第二百七十四条的规定，以\u003Cstrong>敲诈勒索罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>定罪处罚。请注意这条的两个要件：\u003Cstrong>一是“以发布、删除网络信息为由”，二是“威胁、要挟”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二，编造、散布虚假信息起哄闹事，另有对应条款。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 同一解释第五条规定：编造虚假信息，或者明知是编造的虚假信息，在信息网络上散布，或者组织、指使人员在信息网络上散布，起哄闹事，造成公共秩序严重混乱的，依照刑法第二百九十三条第一款第（四）项的规定，以\u003Cstrong>寻衅滋事罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>定罪处罚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三，“软暴力”同样可以通过信息网络实施。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 2019 年两高两部《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》在列举软暴力手段时，明确包含“通过信息网络或者通讯工具”实施的方式。也就是说，\u003Cstrong>隔着屏幕一样可以形成“心理强制、威慑”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四，涉网犯罪可以构成有组织犯罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《反有组织犯罪法》第二十三条明确，利用信息网络实施的犯罪，符合该法第二条规定的，应当认定为有组织犯罪。这意味着“网络恶势力”不是修辞，而是法律概念。\u003Cstrong>“我们只是做线上业务、不接触人”这句话，不是免责理由。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：这类案件的第一项工作，是把公司做过的每一单业务按“性质”分档：\u003Cstrong>正规舆情监测与申诉、依法维权与律师函、付费删帖、以负面信息相要挟索财。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 四档的业务流程、收费方式、沟通记录完全不同，混在一起谈只会越谈越重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、当事人和家属最关心的 10 个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第1问｜我开的公司做舆情监测和危机应对，怎么就成“水军”了？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>“水军”不是法律概念，法律看的是具体行为，而不是公司名字或业务描述。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>舆情监测、危机公关、品牌维护都是合法业务。判断是否越界，要看三件事：一是\u003Cstrong>内容是否虚假\u003C\u002Fstrong>（有没有编造、有没有指使他人编造）；二是\u003Cstrong>手段是否正当\u003C\u002Fstrong>（是向平台申诉、发律师函、公开澄清，还是组织批量账号刷屏、有组织地攻击特定对象）；三是\u003Cstrong>收费依据是什么\u003C\u002Fstrong>（是服务费，还是“删掉一条多少钱”）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>司法实践中被认定为“网络水军”的典型形态，是\u003Cstrong>有组织地批量发布、转发、评论，或者有组织地以删除信息为条件收费\u003C\u002Fstrong>。单纯的舆情监测与依法维权，不在这个范围内。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：把公司的服务合同、交付成果（监测报告、申诉记录、澄清声明）整理出来。\u003Cstrong>能证明“我交付的是服务，不是删帖结果”，就守住了第一道防线。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第2问｜有偿删帖为什么会被认定为敲诈勒索，而不是普通民事交易？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>因为法律关注的不是“有没有收钱”，而是“对方为什么愿意给钱”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2013 年网络司法解释第六条之所以把“以发布、删除网络信息为由索取财物”直接指向敲诈勒索罪，是因为这类行为的本质是\u003Cstrong>利用对方对名誉、商誉受损的恐惧来获取财物\u003C\u002Fstrong>。它具备敲诈勒索罪的完整结构：行为人制造或利用了对方的恐惧心理，对方基于恐惧交付财物，行为人因此获利。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果帖子内容是真实的、发帖人有正当的批评权，那么要求对方“付费删帖”，性质就更加明显——\u003Cstrong>你要求对方为“不曝光真实信息”付钱，这本身就是以损害相要挟。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 反过来，如果帖子内容确属捏造，权利人依法要求平台删除、或通过诉讼维权并主张损失赔偿，这属于正当维权。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>区分“向谁要钱、以什么名义要钱”\u003C\u002Fstrong>。向平台申诉零成本，向发帖人私下“谈撤稿价”才是风险最高的一步。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第3问｜我只是转发、评论，也算寻衅滋事吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>关键看内容真假、是否明知，以及是否起哄闹事造成公共秩序严重混乱。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>依据 2013 年网络司法解释第五条，构成寻衅滋事的前提是“编造虚假信息，或者明知是编造的虚假信息而在信息网络上散布”，并且“起哄闹事，造成公共秩序严重混乱”。三个要件缺一不可：\u003Cstrong>虚假性、明知性、后果严重性。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>因此，对真实事件表达意见、转发已公开报道、对公共事务进行评论，通常不满足第一个要件；而受雇组织批量账号对特定对象实施集中攻击、编造事实进行攻击，则可能同时满足多个要件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：保留信息获取渠道的原始记录，说明自己\u003Cstrong>“看到的是什么、从哪里看到的”\u003C\u002Fstrong>，这是判断“是否明知虚假”的直接证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第4问｜一次只要几千块，数额不大，会不会就没事？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>不会。这类行为有“数额”和“次数”两条入罪路径，次数往往更容易成立。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>依据 2013 年网络司法解释第六条，实施该类行为“数额较大，\u003Cstrong>或者多次\u003C\u002Fstrong>实施”即可能构成敲诈勒索罪。也就是说，即使每一笔金额都不大，只要次数达到“多次”的标准，同样可能入罪。这与《刑法》第二百七十四条及相关司法解释中“多次敲诈勒索”的认定逻辑是一致的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这一点在涉网案件里尤其需要注意：\u003Cstrong>线上业务的特点是“单笔小、笔数多”。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 几十笔小额的“撤稿费”，汇总起来往往直接跨过数额门槛，同时满足“多次”的认定条件。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>统计每一笔业务的金额、次数、对象、时间\u003C\u002Fstrong>，不要只看单笔。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第5问｜“曝光”和“敲诈”的界限在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>分界线是“有无正当权利基础”和“索财与曝光之间是否形成胁迫关系”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>判断时通常看四点：\u003Cstrong>一是内容是否真实\u003C\u002Fstrong>——真实事实的揭露，与编造事实的攻击，性质完全不同；\u003Cstrong>二是行为人与事件有无关联\u003C\u002Fstrong>——自己是权利人的维权，与“蹲点找料、待价而沽”的牟利，性质不同；\u003Cstrong>三是索要的数额是否有依据\u003C\u002Fstrong>——与实际损失相当的赔偿，与明显超出损失的“封口费”，性质不同；\u003Cstrong>四是表达的姿态\u003C\u002Fstrong>——“我要为你维权”与“不给钱我就发出去”，性质不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第三点和第四点在实践中最有决定性。\u003Cstrong>“封口费”这个词本身就带有极强的指向性\u003C\u002Fstrong>，如果公司内部沟通、报价记录、聊天记录中大量出现“封口”“谈价”“压下去”这类表述，这些材料会成为控方最有力的证据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>关键不是在法庭上解释话术，而是看有没有客观的权利基础和费用依据。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 事后再解释“我本意不是这样”，作用有限。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第6问｜信息发在境外平台上，国内办案机关能管吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>能。关键在于“行为地”和“结果发生地”是否落在国内。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《刑法》第六条确立了属地管辖原则，凡在中华人民共和国领域内犯罪的，除法律有特别规定外，都适用本法；犯罪的行为或者结果有一项发生在领域内的，就认为是在领域内犯罪。在信息网络犯罪案件中，服务器所在地、被害人所在地、行为人操作所在地、资金结算地等，都可能被认定为犯罪地。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所以“平台在境外”并不构成当然的抗辩。实践中真正有辩护价值的问题是：\u003Cstrong>具体哪些行为发生在境内、被害人和资金流向在哪里、行为人实际控制哪些环节。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>梳理清楚“谁在什么地点做了什么操作”。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 管辖与行为地的认定，会直接影响指控范围。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第7问｜公司接了企业的“反黑稿”业务，员工也要担责吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>要按个人的知情与参与程度分别评价，不能因为“在公司上班”就一律入罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》要求，对恶势力成员应当根据其在违法犯罪活动中的地位、作用、参与程度、获利情况等分别处理。在涉网案件中，公司的岗位分工往往很细：有人做数据抓取、有人写文案、有人负责对接客户、有人负责对外发布。\u003Cstrong>这些岗位与“组织实施虚假信息攻击或以此索财”之间的距离远近不同，责任也不同。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>真正风险高的是：负责与发帖人“谈价”的人、负责统筹发布节奏的人、负责收款分账的人、以及对整个模式有认知并设计流程的人。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>按岗位列出每个人接触到的业务类型。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 只做技术抓取、只做公开数据分析的员工，和负责“谈判撤稿价”的员工，辩护路径完全不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第8问｜为什么说“软暴力”隔着屏幕也能成立？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>因为软暴力的评价对象是“心理强制效果”，而不是物理接触。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2019 年两高两部《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》把“通过信息网络或者通讯工具”实施的行为纳入软暴力的方式范围，并明确其认定标准是“对他人形成心理强制、威慑，足以使他人产生恐惧，进而实现非法目的”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在网络场景下，常见的形态包括：持续的批量评论与私信轰炸、扬言在多个平台同步曝光、扬言向监管部门恶意举报、扬言向对方的合作方与客户群发信息、威胁公开个人隐私。\u003Cstrong>这些行为即使一句话都没说“打你”，也可能构成刑法意义上的威胁。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>把私信、评论、群发的原始记录完整保留\u003C\u002Fstrong>（不要只截图对自己有利的部分，要保留完整上下文和时间顺序），逐条判断内容是否指向“损害名誉、隐私、经营”等法益。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第9问｜涉网型涉恶案件会被加重处理吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>会被纳入从严惩处的类型，但认定门槛仍在，辩护空间也在。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《反有组织犯罪法》第二十三条明确把利用信息网络实施的符合条件的犯罪认定为有组织犯罪，说明立法上已把网络空间纳入有组织犯罪的规制范围。这意味着同样的事实，一旦叠加“有组织”，量刑会明显趋重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>但反过来说，\u003Cstrong>“有组织”本身需要证据支撑\u003C\u002Fstrong>：是否有稳定的纠集关系、是否有明确分工、是否在一定区域或行业内多次实施、是否造成了相应的危害后果。达州分所团队的特点在于，张罗主任具有十三年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，\u003Cstrong>熟悉侦查机关的取证思路与证据链构建方式，能够从侦查视角反向审查案卷中的证据瑕疵\u003C\u002Fstrong>，这一点在涉网案件中尤其重要——涉案证据几乎全部是电子数据，取证合法性、完整性、关联性都有可争之处。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>关注电子数据的取证程序。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 提取笔录是否完整、原始存储介质是否封存、数据是否有篡改可能，都是可以单独主张的辩点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第10问｜什么情况下应该马上请律师？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>出现以下任一情形，就不要再等。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一是公司被集中调查，多名员工被带走，或者你被要求提供全部客户清单与业务台账；二是收到《调取证据通知书》《传唤证》，被要求说明“某笔费用的性质”；三是客户或发帖人开始集体报案；四是你的账户、公司账户被冻结，或者平台账号被封禁并收到协查通知。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这类案件有一个特点：\u003Cstrong>证据全在线上，而线上证据是最容易被“清理”也是被清理后最容易被发现异常的。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 删除聊天记录、注销账号、清空群聊，都会留下痕迹，并且会被直接解读为“明知违法”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>先固定、后咨询。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 把业务合同、报价记录、沟通记录、交付成果原样保存，再找律师评估每一档业务的法律性质。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、事实与材料核对表：想争取从宽，先把这些材料备齐\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>涉网型案件的证据几乎全部是电子数据。\u003Cstrong>请尽早固定，不要注销账号、不要清空群聊、不要格式化设备。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">业务合同\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">服务合同、报价单、服务清单、验收与交付记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明业务性质是服务交付，而非删帖收费\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">交付成果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">舆情监测报告、平台申诉记录、澄清声明、律师函\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明实际提供的服务内容与成果形态\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">与客户、发帖人的完整聊天记录、邮件、通话录音\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">判断是否存在“以曝光相要挟”的胁迫结构\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">资金往来\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">收付款流水、发票、提成记录、分账记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">核减涉案金额，区分服务费与索取款项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">平台数据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">账号注册信息、后台操作日志、发布与删除记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">确认行为主体、操作环节与参与人员范围\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">内容属性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">涉案帖文原文、真实性核查材料、投诉处理记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">判断内容真假与主观明知，区分评论与编造传播\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">强制措施文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">传唤证、拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、起诉意见书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">确认罪名、所处阶段与办案机关，判断辩护窗口\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">财产与家庭\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">婚姻登记、亲属关系证明、共有财产凭证、病历、就学证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">申请解除对合法财产与必要生活费用的冻结\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>注意：以上材料请提供原件或清晰复印件、照片，电子数据的截图请保留完整上下文与时间信息。\u003Cstrong>不要自行修改、补签、倒签日期，更不要删除聊天记录、注销账号。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 真实是这件事的底线，一旦有材料被查出造假，或有关键电子数据被删除，整个家庭的从宽主张都会受到严重影响。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安办理过的涉黑涉恶案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：郑某敲诈勒索案 —— 一审十二年，二审改判七年半】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 郑某因涉嫌敲诈勒索罪被提起公诉，一审判决有期徒刑十二年，当事人与家属几乎放弃希望。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安张罗主任接手后，凭借十三年公安刑侦大队的实战经验，从证据链的完整性入手重新梳理案件，围绕索财行为的事实认定、数额计算依据以及当事人在其中的实际作用，逐项提出辩护意见并与办案机关反复沟通。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 二审改判，\u003Cstrong>刑期由一审的十二年改判为七年半\u003C\u002Fstrong>。这说明敲诈勒索类案件中，数额认定与事实细节的逐项拆解，是能够实质影响裁判结果的工作。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）—— 软暴力催收的法条适用之争】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 杨某经营小额贷款公司，在催收过程中采取限制人身自由、恐吓等违法方式，并牵涉多起打架斗殴事件，被指控寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪，并被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队在审查起诉阶段针对法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致比对与质证，\u003Cstrong>成功促使检察院撤回该项起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>；在审判阶段围绕催收行为与寻衅滋事、非法拘禁的法条竞合关系请专家论证，反对将事出有因的催收行为拔高为扰乱公共秩序的重罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院未对杨某适用更为严苛的重罪重罚，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚仅决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案 —— 索财目的与从犯地位的双重辩护】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件起因是投资公司退股纠纷，双方就股本金退还协商未果，后在协商过程中以威胁方式迫使对方出具借条，黄某被指控构成涉恶势力犯罪的敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师团队提出案件起因系真实民事纠纷、被害人存在过错；\u003Cstrong>不应将民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>；同时主张黄某与主犯在动机、过错程度上存在明显区别，应认定为从犯，且已积极退赔并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在全案被定性为涉恶、面临从严惩处的背景下，法院采纳从轻意见，\u003Cstrong>当事人最终被从轻判处有期徒刑三年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：董某四罪涉黑案 —— 论证索款目的的合法性，剥离敲诈勒索重罪】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 董某被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等多项罪名，起诉书指控其敲诈勒索数额巨大、任意毁坏公私财物情节严重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队主张：\u003Cstrong>索要的是被拖欠的工程款，目的具有合法性，不能因手段过激而直接等同于敲诈勒索\u003C\u002Fstrong>；在另一起事实中当事人并无非法占有目的，客观上也未占有款项，甚至不知款项已支付。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院最终采纳辩护意见，在量刑压力极大的情形下，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：孙某等 45 人特大涉黑案 —— 突破量刑建议，刑期与罚金双项削减】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 孙某被控参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭伪造证据罪等。在当事人未认罪认罚的情况下，检方量刑建议为十年六个月、罚金二十万元，后变更为九至十一年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队提出，\u003Cstrong>案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引起，不应被拔高认定为涉黑组织的“标志性事件”\u003C\u002Fstrong>；并运用禁止重复评价原则，指出销毁证据系出于亲属情面、缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪重复评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院最终决定对孙某执行\u003Cstrong>有期徒刑九年，罚金由二十万元降至十三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（案例说明：以上案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径与辩护方法。具体案件事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准，既往个案不构成对任何案件的结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安在涉黑涉恶案件上的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势一：专注刑事，只做刑事，拒绝万金油】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 涉网型案件最容易出现的误判，是用“商业合规”或“民事侵权”的思路去应对刑事指控。但《刑法》第二百七十四条与 2013 年网络司法解释第六条的对应关系，是纯粹的刑事法问题。卓安（达州）律师事务所坚守“只做刑事案件”的核心定位，张罗主任深耕刑事辩护多年，熟悉公安机关侦查办案流程，能够从侦查视角反向审视证据体系，把民事违约与刑事犯罪、个别越界与整体定性严格分开。\u003Cstrong>这种定位决定了团队会把“是否构成犯罪”作为首要判断，而不是先讨论商业风险。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势二：全国化一体化，总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 涉网案件天然跨地域：公司在一个城市、客户遍布全国、帖子发在境外平台、资金通过第三方支付流转。卓安在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地设有分所，依托“总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同”的机制，可以就近会见、就近阅卷，并调动全国类案判例与专家资源应对跨区域管辖与程序衔接问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势三：平台化与数智化意识强，擅长电子数据审查】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 涉网案件的全部指控都建立在电子数据之上：帖文、账号、操作日志、聊天记录、支付流水。卓安以“数智化全流程管控服务品质”为抓手，落实“数智辅助专业服务，律师承担最终判断”，能够对海量电子数据做结构化梳理——\u003Cstrong>按主体、按时间、按内容属性、按资金流向分类\u003C\u002Fstrong>，并同步审查取证程序的合法性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势四：团队研判、专业分工、多级复核】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安坚持团队辩护模式：重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑；团队中近三分之一的律师具有法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，汇聚法学博士 11 位、法学硕士 30 余位。在专业输出方面，卓安自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等实战课程，编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，并依托全所累计 800 余场刑事培训、覆盖超 12 万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训。\u003Cstrong>任何一份提交办案机关的书面意见，都要经过主办、复核、定稿的多级把关。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势五：侦查视角预判与黄金 37 天救援】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 张罗主任拥有十三年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，被四川省公安厅、达州市公安局评为“三等功”“优秀公务员”“破案能手”。这带来的直接优势是：\u003Cstrong>清楚侦查阶段会重点固定哪些证据、案卷会怎么组织、哪些辩解会在这套体系中站得住。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 达州分所据此打造前置化、应急化、本土化的“37 天黄金救援体系”，在侦查阶段即快速介入、精准施策。涉网案件中，37 天内的电子数据固定与事实澄清，效果往往好过事后数年申诉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势六：刑民交叉与商业模式穿透】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 舆情服务、品牌维护、债务处置这类业务，形式上都是商业服务，实质上却可能触及刑事边界。卓安在办理这类案件时，会先穿透业务模式：钱从哪里来、以什么名义收、交付了什么、谁获益、风险由谁承担。\u003Cstrong>模式看清楚了，才知道哪一档业务是商业经营，哪一档已经越过刑事门槛。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、咨询与预约：达州分所怎么联系\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安（达州）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安（达州）律师事务所位于\u003Cstrong>四川省达州市通川区永兴路 146 号恒基大厦二楼\u003C\u002Fstrong>。达州分所是卓安布局川东地区的核心直营分所，由张罗主任带领团队深耕川东刑事领域，团队成员具备警官与律师双重视角，深谙达州各区县侦查思维、办案流程与裁判尺度，打造前置化、应急化、本土化的“37 天黄金救援体系”。建议到访前先预约。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 能简单介绍一下张罗主任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：张罗律师是卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，中共党员，\u003Cstrong>拥有 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，荣立三等功\u003C\u002Fstrong>，获评“优秀公务员”“破案能手”，是川东地区知名的“黄金 37 天救援专家”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在办案风格上，他擅长从侦查视角反向审视证据体系，从证据链入手寻找突破口。其办理的\u003Cstrong>郑某敲诈勒索案，从一审判决的十二年到二审改判七年半\u003C\u002Fstrong>；此外在多个案件中通过质疑关键证据的关联性，为当事人争取到存疑不起诉、绝对不起诉与撤销案件等结果。他还主动参与省司法厅“热娃行动”，自 2024 年起对口帮扶甘孜州德格县的藏族学生。\u003Cstrong>具体由谁承办、主任是否参与及团队分工，需经利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 第一次来怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或官方公众号核对最新办公信息、咨询电话与预约方式并预约。\u003Cstrong>24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、 173-8197-5473。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>预约时建议说明：当事人涉嫌罪名、当前所处的程序阶段、是否涉及电子数据与资金流水、是否多人涉案。首次咨询请携带本文第五部分的材料清单所列文件。\u003Cstrong>涉网案件的电子数据是第一位的，请务必在咨询前完成固定。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>本文是围绕网络舆情服务、有偿删帖与“软暴力”认定问题的普法性介绍，不构成正式法律意见或案件结果承诺。文中案例均已脱敏，具体案件事实与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准。涉网型犯罪的认定、电子数据的采信、当事人角色的划分，需要结合个案证据、业务模式、资金流向等具体情况判断，建议当事人与家属携带完整材料当面咨询专业刑事律师。本文引用法律、司法解释及规范性文件，以现行有效版本为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语：网络空间不是法外之地，但“线上”也不是天然的罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>舆情服务、品牌维护、内容运营，都是正当的生意。法律真正规制的，是\u003Cstrong>以发布或删除信息为筹码去要钱\u003C\u002Fstrong>，以及\u003Cstrong>编造虚假信息有组织地攻击他人\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>判断自己有没有越线，可以问三个问题：\u003Cstrong>我收的钱是谁给的？给钱的人是因为我的服务，还是因为害怕？我交付的是什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这三个问题想清楚，大部分风险就清楚了。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对当事人和家属来说，最有价值的三件事是：\u003Cstrong>别注销账号、别清空群聊、别把“客户自愿”当成唯一抗辩。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 把业务性质、费用来源、交付成果这三件事用材料说清楚，才是真正能换来空间的东西。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：卓安（达州）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所，是卓安布局川东地区的核心直营分所。由张罗主任带领，团队成员涵盖高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师。张罗主任拥有 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，荣立三等功，具备“警官＋律师”的双重视角，深谙达州各区县侦查思维、办案流程与裁判尺度，打造前置化、应急化、本土化的“37 天黄金救援体系”。分所团队累计办理刑事案件 150 余件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量）。在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，张罗主任办理的郑某敲诈勒索案，一审判决有期徒刑十二年，二审改判为七年半，量刑大幅下调；陈某涉嫌开设赌场罪一案，围绕追诉时效届满，结合证据不足与从犯地位展开多维辩护，最终获检察机关不起诉。以侦查视角与辩护思维的双重优势，在川东涉黑涉恶及关联犯罪案件中持续实现量刑优化与无罪化处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所主任张罗律师系达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任。拥有 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，在公安系统任职期间被四川省公安厅、达州市公安局评为“三等功”“优秀公务员”“优秀党员”及“破案能手”，具备“警官＋律师”的双重视角，是川东地区知名的“黄金 37 天救援专家”，以丰富的实战积淀获得当事人与同行的广泛认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789722980295.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、173-8197-5473\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所地址：四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-18 17:58:58",{"id":207,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":207,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":10,"jsonLd":639},"【卓安解答】我在达州做网络舆情服务，帮客户处理负面帖子，怎么就成了涉恶的网络黑恶团伙？ - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","——“有偿删帖”与“合法舆情服务”之间隔着什么：网络黑恶的涉恶认定与软暴力升格 10 问 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在达州开了家传媒公司，主要做舆情监测和品牌维护。客户被网上发帖了，我们先评估内容是不是失实，然后帮客户找平台申诉、准备律师函、发布","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F545",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"mainEntity":644},"FAQPage",[645],{"@type":646,"name":647,"acceptedAnswer":648},"Question","——“有偿删帖”与“合法舆情服务”之间隔着什么：网络黑恶的涉恶认定与软暴力升格 10 问 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在达州开了家传媒公司，主要做舆情监测和品牌维护。客户被网上发帖了，我们先评估内容是不是失实，然后帮客户找平台申诉、准备律师函、发布澄清声明。” “但有些帖子平台不删，客户着急，我们就私下联系发帖人谈，谈成了给一",{"@type":649,"text":650},"Answer","——“有偿删帖”与“合法舆情服务”之间隔着什么：网络黑恶的涉恶认定与软暴力升格 10 问 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在达州开了家传媒公司，主要做舆情监测和品牌维护。客户被网上发帖了，我们先评估内容是不是失实，然后帮客户找平台申诉、准备律师函、发布澄清声明。” “但有些帖子平台不删，客户着急，我们就私下联系发帖人谈，谈成了给一笔‘撤稿费’。我一开始就觉得不太对，但客户愿意出，发帖人也愿意收，我以为这就是协商。” “现在公司被查了，说我搞‘有偿删帖’、是网络黑恶，还说我这是‘舆情敲诈’。可我从没威胁过谁，是发帖人自己开价要钱的。这也能算犯罪？” 这三个问题指向同一个法律命题： 网络空间里的“表达”与“交易”，什么时候会被纳入刑法的评价范围？“协商撤稿”与“敲诈勒索”之间，界限究竟在哪里？ 卓安（达州）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。卓安律师团队累计办理"]