[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-543":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":207,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},543,"2026-09-18 18:03:48","【卓安解答】我在昆明放贷收违约金，怎么就成了“套路贷”涉黑涉恶？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F73d1da50-81ef-4aa7-b410-e6591f289770.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789723668760.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>——不看利息高不高，看“虚增债务、恶意制造违约、非法占有目的”：借贷行为罪与非罪的 10 个真问题\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：问答文章\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年9月18日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>“我在昆明做民间借贷，走的是正规流程：签合同、留身份信息、银行转账，抵押手续也办了。合同里写了逾期违约金，日万分之五。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“去年有三个客户还不上钱，我起诉了，法院也判了。结果今年公安找上门，说我涉嫌‘套路贷’，还是恶势力。我实在想不通——\u003Cstrong>钱是我真金白银借出去的，走的也是法院，怎么就成犯罪了？\u003C\u002Fstrong>”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“我承认我给过一些客户‘服务费’‘保证金’的讲法，也有人提前扣过一个月的利息。这些是不是就构成‘虚增债务’了？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这三个问题指向同一个法律命题：\u003Cstrong>真实的民间借贷与“套路贷”之间的界线究竟在哪里？一个收了高额违约金、走了诉讼程序的出借人，什么时候会被认定为刑事犯罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。卓安律师团队累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件，成功为 60 余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格。结合卓安（昆明）黄婧主任团队办理涉黑涉恶案件、非法控制型经营案件的实务经验，本文把当事人和家属最关心的 10 个问题一次说清。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、明确判断：区分“套路贷”与民间借贷，看的不是利息，是手法\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一，“套路贷”的本质是“以借贷为名行非法占有之实”。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 2019 年两高两部《关于办理“套路贷”刑事案件若干问题的意见》明确：“套路贷”是以非法占有为目的，假借民间借贷之名，诱使或迫使被害人签订“借贷”或变相“借贷”“抵押”“担保”等相关协议，通过虚增借贷金额、恶意制造违约、肆意认定违约、毁匿还款证据等方式形成虚假债权债务，并借助诉讼、仲裁、公证或者采用暴力、威胁以及其他手段非法占有被害人财物的违法犯罪活动。\u003Cstrong>判断的落脚点是“非法占有目的”加“虚假债权债务”的形成手法，不是利率高低。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二，真实的民间借贷即使利率偏高、违约金偏重，也不当然构成犯罪。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 民间借贷中超过法定上限的利息部分，法律上的后果是不受保护、不予支持，属于民事调整范围。《民法典》以及最高人民法院关于审理民间借贷案件适用法律若干问题的规定，对利率上限有明确规则，超出部分的处理方式是“不予保护”，而不是“追究刑责”。\u003Cstrong>民事上不保护，不等于刑事上要追究。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三，几个具体手法是“套路贷”的典型标志。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 一是虚增借贷金额（如以“保证金”“服务费”“中介费”名义抬高合同金额，实际放款低于合同金额，即通常所说的“砍头息”）；二是恶意制造违约或肆意认定违约（例如故意失联、拒收还款、临时变更还款账户，制造对方无法按期还款）；三是毁匿还款证据（如收回借条却不销账、拒不交出还款凭证）；四是软硬兼施索债。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四，一旦叠加“有组织、多次、在一定区域内实施”，定性风险会急剧升高。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这也是“套路贷”案件为什么会从诈骗、敲诈勒索升级为恶势力、甚至黑社会性质组织的原因。《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》要求 3 人以上、纠集者相对固定、在一定区域或行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动。\u003Cstrong>“同一批人、同一套话术、同一片区域、反复做”，是定性升级的关键组合。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：这类案件的第一项工作是把全部借贷业务做一次“合规体检”：\u003Cstrong>谁的债权、多少钱、放款多少、实际到手多少、还款多少、有没有虚增、有没有制造违约。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这笔账不先算清楚，任何辩解都是空的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、当事人和家属最关心的 10 个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第1问｜真实借款、收高息，是不是就是“套路贷”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>不是。高息是民事问题，“套路”是刑事问题，两者不是一回事。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“套路贷”意见规定的核心是“以非法占有为目的，假借民间借贷之名……形成虚假债权债务”。也就是说，成立的关键在于债权债务关系本身是不是虚假的、被刻意做大的。如果出借人确实交付了本金，双方对借款金额、期限、利率有真实合意，借款人明知并自愿签署，那么即使利率超出司法保护上限，也属于民事纠纷范畴。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>反过来，如果合同金额远高于实际交付金额，差额被包装成“服务费”“保证金”“砍头息”，并且这部分差额被计入本金继续生息，那就触及了“虚增借贷金额”这一核心手法。\u003Cstrong>判断标准是“实际到手多少钱”，而不是“合同上写多少钱”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>整理放款流水，把“合同金额—实际放款—实际还款”做成三栏对照表。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这张表是这类案件最核心的证据，也是辩护的起点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第2问｜违约金约定得高一些，会不会被认定为“虚增债务”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>约定违约金本身不违法，但违约金“只在纸上、从不到账”就可能被重新评价。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>违约金、罚息是合同双方对违约后果的约定，属于意思自治范围。司法实践中，法院对过高的违约金会依法予以调整，这仍然是民事层面的问题。真正引起刑事关注的是另一种情形：\u003Cstrong>制造一个根本不会发生的违约后果，然后用这个虚构的后果去放大债务总额。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>典型表现包括：约定明显不合理的短期限、故意不告知还款账户、拒收还款后又以“逾期”为由主张高额违约金、把违约金直接折算成本金计入借条。这些行为的共同点是——\u003Cstrong>违约是出借方制造的，而不是借款人造成的。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：保留催告还款、通知账户、协商展期的全部记录。\u003Cstrong>能证明“我给过对方还款机会”，就能直接推翻“恶意制造违约”的指控。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第3问｜什么是“砍头息”？为什么它是这类案件最要命的一环？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>因为“砍头息”是“虚增借贷金额”最直接、最容易固化的证据形态。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>所谓“砍头息”，是指出借时预先从本金中扣除利息或其他费用，借款人实际到手的金额低于合同或借条载明的金额，但还款时仍按载明金额计算。在“套路贷”案件中，这一步的价值在于：\u003Cstrong>它在一开始就制造出了与实际交付不符的债权凭证。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 有了这个基础，后续的“转单平账”“以贷还贷”才能不断滚大债务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>需要区分的是：如果双方明确知晓并同意预扣利息，且实际到手金额、计息基数都与约定一致，这在民事上可能被认定为利息预先扣除，处理方式是按实际借款金额认定本金——\u003Cstrong>这仍然是民事范畴\u003C\u002Fstrong>。但如果是刻意隐瞒、在借条上做高金额，并且以此为基础反复主张，性质就完全不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：把每一笔业务的实际放款金额与借条金额逐笔核对。\u003Cstrong>差额部分如果能在放款当天用银行流水说清楚，就还有辩解空间；说不清楚，就会被推定为主观明知。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第4问｜借款人自愿签的借条，为什么有人说“不是真实意思表示”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>“自愿”要看签署当时的具体情境，而不是看纸上有没有签名。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果借款人是在被告知虚假信息（如被隐瞒实际利率、被承诺可以随时提前还款不收费）、或者处于急需资金、没有议价余地的情况下签署的，那么这种“自愿”在刑法上可能被评价为“形式自愿、实质被诱使或被迫”。这正是“套路贷”意见中“诱使或迫使被害人签订”的含义。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>但从辩护角度看，这恰恰是可以反驳的地方：\u003Cstrong>“诱使”和“迫使”都需要证据支撑，而不是靠事后推定。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 如果出借人在签署时明确告知了各项费用、留痕完整、双方对借贷事项交流充分，那么“诱使”就很难成立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>签约过程的留痕极其重要\u003C\u002Fstrong>——微信沟通、录音、面签录像、公证、见证人，都能证明当时是充分告知。\u003Cstrong>很多时候，一份完整的签约录音，价值超过十份事后说明。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第5问｜我通过起诉、申请执行去要债，会不会被说成“借助诉讼手段非法占有”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>手段本身是中性的，关键看背后主张的是不是真实、合法的债权。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“套路贷”意见确实把“借助诉讼、仲裁、公证”列为非法占有财物的手段之一。但这有一个前提：\u003Cstrong>用的是虚假债权。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 如果债权本身真实、有完整的交付凭证、诉讼中如实陈述事实、法院经审理后依法裁判，那么走诉讼程序不但不构成犯罪，反而是依法维权的正常方式。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务中最值得注意的问题是“虚假诉讼”的牵连风险。《刑法》第三百零七条之一规定了虚假诉讼罪：以捏造的事实提起民事诉讼，妨害司法秩序或者严重侵害他人合法权益的，处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制，并处或者单处罚金；情节严重的，处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑，并处罚金。\u003Cstrong>如果起诉所依据的债务被认定为“虚增”部分，这部分主张本身就可能被单独评价。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：把诉讼材料完整保存——起诉状、证据清单、庭审笔录、判决书。\u003Cstrong>这些材料能证明“我是如实陈述，而不是隐瞒真相骗取裁判”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第6问｜年利率超过法定上限，会不会构成犯罪？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>超过司法保护上限是民事后果，是否构成犯罪要看有没有“经常性向社会不特定对象放贷”等要件。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2019 年两高两部《关于办理非法放贷刑事案件若干问题的意见》规定，违反国家规定，未经监管部门批准，或者超越经营范围，以营利为目的，经常性地向社会不特定对象发放贷款，扰乱金融市场秩序，情节严重的，以非法经营罪定罪处罚。这里的核心要件是\u003Cstrong>“经常性”＋“向社会不特定对象”＋“情节严重”\u003C\u002Fstrong>，并配有明确的数额和人数标准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>也就是说，向特定范围内的亲友、熟人出借资金，即使利率较高，通常不满足“向社会不特定对象”这一要件。而如果是以放贷为业、面向不特定人群、规模化运作，则风险显著上升。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>统计出借对象的范围与人数。\u003C\u002Fstrong> “出借对象是熟人圈子还是社会公众”，是判断是否触及非法放贷刑事风险的第一道分水岭。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第7问｜我收了“服务费”“保证金”“中介费”，算不算虚增债务？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>要看费用有没有真实对应的服务，以及是否被计入本金反复计息。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果确实提供了信息撮合、风险评估、担保措施、代管服务等真实服务，并留有服务记录，费用收取本身有商业基础。但如果费用只是名义上的名目，没有对应服务内容，实际目的就是抬高合同金额，并且这部分费用被并入本金继续计息、在后续催收和诉讼中被一并主张，那么就会被认定为虚增债务的一部分。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>更需要注意的是“转单平账”和“以贷还贷”——用新借条覆盖旧债，把利息和费用滚动计入新本金。这一手法会迅速把债务规模放大，也是“套路贷”意见明确列举的方式。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>为每一笔费用找到对应的服务证据\u003C\u002Fstrong>（合同、发票、服务记录、沟通留痕），并说明该费用是否计息、计息依据。\u003Cstrong>费用本身不可怕，可怕的是它变成“没有对应服务的本金”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第8问｜借款人自己逾期不还，我罚息、催告，为什么被说成“恶意制造违约”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>关键是“违约是谁造成的”，这一点证据说了算。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>如果借款人到期不还，出借人依约主张罚息、发催告函，这是正常的债权维护。要被认定为“恶意制造违约”，通常需要证据显示：出借人故意让借款人无法按期还款，例如临时变更还款账户且不告知、拒收款项、在还款日故意失联、以各种理由拖延出具还款凭证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>从辩护角度，能证明“没有人为制造障碍”的证据非常有力：账户信息变更的告知记录、催告还款的通知记录、接受部分还款的记录、同意展期的沟通记录。\u003Cstrong>这些记录的存在，直接把“恶意”二字打掉。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：把催收与展期的全部沟通记录整理成时间轴。\u003Cstrong>在“恶意”这类主观指控上，客观时间轴是最有效的反驳工具。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第9问｜我的公司没有暴力催收，只是打电话和起诉，会被认定涉黑涉恶吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶的认定有严格要件，不会仅因为“做借贷”就成立。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>黑社会性质组织的成立需要同时具备组织特征、经济特征、行为特征和危害性特征（《刑法》第二百九十四条第五款）；恶势力需要满足 3 人以上、纠集者相对固定、在一定区域或行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动等条件。\u003Cstrong>没有任何一条是“从事借贷业务”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实践中引发争议的往往是“行为特征”与“危害性特征”：如果没有暴力、威胁或以其他手段有组织地多次实施违法犯罪活动，没有在一定区域或行业内形成非法控制或重大影响，那么即使债权催收方式不当，也难以成立组织性犯罪。这也是卓安在多个案件中实现“降格”“脱黑”的切入方向。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：把业务的正常属性讲清楚——\u003Cstrong>放款有流水、收费有依据、催收有记录、纠纷走法院。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这四个“有”，是对抗组织化指控最实在的材料。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第10问｜什么情况下应该马上请律师？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>出现以下任一情形，就不要再等。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一是被以“套路贷”“非法放贷”名义约谈、传唤，或被要求提供全部借贷台账；二是公司账户、个人账户被冻结，或房产、车辆被查封；三是借款人中出现集体报案，或有人以“报案”为条件向你索要额外款项；四是你已经收到《起诉意见书》，或发现自己的名字出现在他人案卷中。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这类案件的一个特殊之处在于：\u003Cstrong>很多人一开始以为只是民事纠纷，拖到刑事立案之后才找律师，此时大量的业务台账、沟通记录、放款凭证已经难以调取。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 早一步介入，能保留的不是“说法的空间”，而是“证据的空间”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：\u003Cstrong>先把台账、流水、合同、催收记录原样固定，再谈其他。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 不要整理、不要筛选、不要删除。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、事实与材料核对表：想争取从宽，先把这些材料备齐\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>借贷类案件的辩护基础是账目。\u003Cstrong>请尽早整理，但不要修改原件。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">放款凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">银行转账记录、收条、支付截图、资金交付见证材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明实际交付金额，核减“虚增债务”部分\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">借款文件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">借款合同、借条、收据、抵押与担保文件、公证材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明债权关系是否真实存在及双方约定内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">还款记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">还款流水、收款收据、销账记录、部分还款的沟通记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明债务实际履行情况，反驳“毁匿还款证据”\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">费用依据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">服务费、保证金的收费凭据与对应服务记录、发票\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明费用是否有真实对价，是否被计入本金\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">催收记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">催告函、短信与微信通知、通话记录、展期协商记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">反驳“恶意制造违约”“肆意认定违约”\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">诉讼材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">起诉状、证据清单、庭审笔录、判决书、执行文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明依法维权、如实陈述，避免虚假诉讼牵连\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">强制措施文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">传唤证、拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、起诉意见书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">确认罪名、所处阶段与办案机关，判断辩护窗口\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">财产与家庭\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">婚姻登记、亲属关系证明、共有财产凭证、病历、就学证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">申请解除对合法财产与必要生活费用的冻结\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>注意：以上材料请提供原件或清晰复印件、照片。\u003Cstrong>不要自行修改、补签、倒签日期，也不要删除聊天记录与转账记录。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 真实是这件事的底线，一旦有材料被查出造假，或有关键记录被删除，整个家庭的从宽主张都会受到严重影响。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安办理过的涉黑涉恶案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案 —— 全案脱黑，涉案财产解封】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> L 某被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪，全家涉案财产被查封，家庭一度陷入绝境。该案的争议焦点在于组织特征与危害性特征是否成立，以及财产范围如何界定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安黄婧主任花整整一个月逐页梳理卷宗、逐字逐句抠证据，围绕组织特征与行为特征的缺失展开“出罪”论证，并对被查封财产逐项核对其来源与权属，主张将合法财产从涉案财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 经辩护，\u003Cstrong>当事人全案脱黑，被查封的财产依法解封\u003C\u002Fstrong>，这个濒临破碎的家庭重新站稳脚跟。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：刘某某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、逃税罪、行贿罪等六罪案 —— 砂石行业“非法控制”指控下，二审改判减刑二年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 刘某某系某市承包河砂开采的个体老板。一审法院认定其通过串通竞拍取得河砂采矿权、向国家工作人员行贿取得许可证，在当地砂石行业内形成非法控制，以六罪并罚判处有期徒刑十八年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队在一审宣判前三天紧急接受委托，加班加点复印并审查了多达 109 卷案卷材料，在二审中确立核心思路：\u003Cstrong>一是不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪，涉案团伙不符合《刑法》第二百九十四条关于黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征；二是对聚众斗殴、行贿、逃税等单一罪名逐一拆解，提出定性或量刑上的从宽情节，并纠正了原起诉书对“逃税罪”的法理表述错误。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 四川省高级人民法院最终采纳部分关键辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>依法对刘某某改判减刑二年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。在当年涉黑重案二审往往维持原判比例极高的背景下，取得了难能可贵的实质性辩护成果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）—— 民事违约引发的催收不应拔高论处】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 杨某经营一家小额贷款公司，在收取贷款过程中与部分逾期客户产生冲突，对长期坏账客户采取了限制人身自由、恐吓等违法方式，被指控寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪，并被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方撤回对法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪的起诉；在审判阶段引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的催收非法债务罪，\u003Cstrong>论证该罪与非法拘禁罪、寻衅滋事罪存在法条包容性竞合，主张催收行为事出有因、被害人存在违约过错，不应无事生非地拔高为扰乱公共秩序的重罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 检方未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚仅决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：董某四罪涉黑案 —— 索要拖欠款项目的的合法性，剥离敲诈勒索重罪】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 董某被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等多项罪名。起诉书指控其敲诈勒索数额巨大、任意毁坏公私财物情节严重。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队主张：\u003Cstrong>在某工厂纠纷中，董某等人索要的是被拖欠的工程款，目的具有合法性，不能因催收手段过激而直接等同于敲诈勒索\u003C\u002Fstrong>；在另一起索要五十万元的事实中，当事人并无非法占有他人财产的主观故意，客观上未占有该款项。这三层论证，本质上就是把“真实债权关系”与“非法占有目的”切开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院最终采纳辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案 —— 民事纠纷前置与从犯地位，从严背景下获从宽】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件源于共同出资设立的投资公司退股纠纷，双方就股本金退还多次协商未果，后在协商过程中以威胁方式迫使对方出具借条，黄某被指控构成涉恶势力犯罪的敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队提出案件起因系真实民事纠纷、被害人存在过错；\u003Cstrong>股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷属于两种完全不同的民事法律关系，不应将民事维权过程中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪\u003C\u002Fstrong>；同时主张黄某系从犯，且已积极退赔并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在全案被定性为涉恶案件、面临从严惩处的背景下，法院采纳从轻意见，\u003Cstrong>当事人最终被从轻判处有期徒刑三年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案 —— 击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 陈某被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪等。控方认为其纠集多名同学、老乡形成“不成文规矩”的团伙，并逐步演变为黑社会性质组织。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队指出，\u003Cstrong>该团伙系同学、老乡基于哥们义气形成的松散社交关系，缺乏明确的帮规帮纪与经济管控特征，不具备法定组织特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>，坚决作不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的剥离辩护，并主动与侦查机关、检察官及承办法官沟通。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院全盘采纳辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>成功打掉涉黑罪名\u003C\u002Fstrong>，当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（案例说明：以上案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径与辩护方法。具体案件事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准，既往个案不构成对任何案件的结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安在涉黑涉恶案件上的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势一：专注刑事，只做刑事，拒绝万金油】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 借贷类案件最典型的陷阱是“用民事思维办刑事案”：利率、违约金、担保效力这些问题当然是民事问题，但一旦进入刑事程序，争点就变成了“非法占有目的”“虚假债权债务”“组织特征”。卓安（昆明）律师事务所定位“一心一意做好刑事法律服务”，以“捍卫生命自由”为使命。坚持只做刑事，按罪名与程序性质细分战队，\u003Cstrong>这种定位决定了团队会在民刑界限上反复校准，而不是把民事思维直接搬进刑事辩护。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势二：全国化一体化，总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 借贷与催收业务天然跨区域：资金在昆明、借款人在各地、债权可能被转让给外地公司。卓安在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地设有分所，依托“总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同”的地域协作机制，可以就近会见、就近阅卷，并调动全国类案判例与专家资源应对跨区域程序衔接问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势三：平台化与数智化意识强，擅长资金证据审查】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 这类案件的核心证据是资金流：放款、还款、费用、转单、平账，动辄上百笔。卓安以“数智化全流程管控服务品质”为抓手，落实“数智辅助专业服务，律师承担最终判断”，能够把海量流水按业务台账结构化，\u003Cstrong>自动生成“合同金额—实际放款—实际还款—超出部分”的对照结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>，让账目自己说话。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势四：团队研判、专业分工、多级复核】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安坚持团队辩护模式：重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑；团队中近三分之一的律师具有法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，汇聚法学博士 11 位、法学硕士 30 余位。在专业输出方面，卓安自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等实战课程，编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，并依托全所累计 800 余场刑事培训、覆盖超 12 万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训。\u003Cstrong>记账这种事一旦上了法庭，差一笔就是差一档量刑，必须经过多级复核。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势五：涉案财产区分与合法财产保全】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 借贷类涉黑涉恶案件中，财产处置往往与定罪量刑同等重要。卓安办理 L 某案时，在推动全案脱黑的同时，对每一笔被查封财产逐项核对来源与权属，主张将合法财产从涉案财产中剥离，最终实现财产解封；在 G 某案中，同样通过提交详实证据将个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离，法院未判处没收个人财产。\u003Cstrong>能保住的钱和能减下来的刑，是两件事，需要同时做。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势六：客户中心——专业有力度，服务有温度】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 借贷类案件的当事人往往是家庭的经济支柱，案件一起，生计与信用同时受损。黄婧主任在执业中坚持“不夸大辩护效果、不隐瞒案件风险”，把最真实的情况、最可行的方案讲清楚；侦查阶段每周至少会见一次，审查起诉阶段逐页梳理卷宗，把每一步工作都记录清楚让家属随时知道进展。\u003Cstrong>在长达一两年的刑事程序里，家属需要的不仅是专业判断，还有稳定、可预期的沟通。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、咨询与预约：昆明分所怎么联系\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安（昆明）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安（昆明）律师事务所位于\u003Cstrong>云南省昆明市五华区小康大道 88 号和谐广场 B 座第 49 层 4909 室\u003C\u002Fstrong>。昆明分所是卓安全国布局的重要直营分所，立足云南、辐射西南，紧扣“一带一路”倡议，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规、普法培训全链条，在经济犯罪、职务犯罪、毒品犯罪、涉黑涉恶犯罪、死刑辩护等领域具备专业优势。建议到访前先预约。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 能简单介绍一下黄婧主任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：黄婧律师是卓安（昆明）律师事务所创始人、主任，卓安刑事合规专业委员会委员，庭立方严选律师，\u003Cstrong>2010 年毕业于西南政法大学\u003C\u002Fstrong>，专注刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规、普法培训领域近十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件逾百起，多次为当事人争取到无罪、罪轻、缓刑、不起诉等辩护效果。\u003Cstrong>2026 年被评为「LegalOne 西部地区法律大奖：杰出律师（刑事业务）」。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在涉黑涉恶领域，黄婧主任办理的 L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪案，经过一个月的卷宗梳理与逐项证据核查，\u003Cstrong>实现全案脱黑，并解封了被查封的涉案财产\u003C\u002Fstrong>；此外她还牵头参与《中小企业合规评价认证标准》等团体标准的起草工作。她坚持“不夸大辩护效果、不隐瞒案件风险”的执业底线，把最真实的情况与最可行的方案一字一句讲清楚。\u003Cstrong>具体由谁承办、主任是否参与及团队分工，需经利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 第一次来怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或官方公众号核对最新办公信息、咨询电话与预约方式并预约。\u003Cstrong>24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、 191-4193-8454。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>预约时建议说明：当事人涉嫌罪名、当前所处的程序阶段、是否涉及借贷业务与账目争议、财产是否被查封冻结。首次咨询请携带本文第五部分的材料清单所列文件。\u003Cstrong>借贷类案件的材料量大，提前整理好，能让首次咨询的效率提高很多。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>本文是围绕民间借贷与“套路贷”界限、违约金与虚增债务认定问题的普法性介绍，不构成正式法律意见或案件结果承诺。文中案例均已脱敏，具体案件事实与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准。“套路贷”的认定、非法占有目的的判断、涉案金额的核减与财产处置，需要结合个案证据、资金流向、业务模式等具体情况判断，建议当事人与家属携带完整材料当面咨询专业刑事律师。本文引用法律、司法解释及规范性文件，以现行有效版本为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语：利息高不是罪，造假账才是\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>真实出借、真实交付、真实债权，是民间借贷的三块基石。法律对高息的态度一直是“不予保护”，而不是“追究刑事责任”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>真正让一个出借人变成被告的，往往不是利率，而是那些“把账做大的动作”：预扣到账金额、把没有服务的费用计入本金、用新借条覆盖旧债、不让对方按期还款、把还款凭证收走却不销账。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对当事人和家属来说，最有价值的三件事是：\u003Cstrong>别删流水、别改合同、别把“对方自愿”当成唯一抗辩。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 把“合同金额、实际放款、实际还款、超出部分”这四组数字用凭证说清楚，才是真正能换来空间的东西。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：卓安（昆明）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（昆明）律师事务所立足云南、辐射西南，定位“一心一意做好刑事法律服务”，以“捍卫生命自由”为使命，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告、企业合规、普法培训全链条。由黄婧律师担任创始人、主任，团队成员包括前法官、检察官、公安及名校法律人才。黄婧主任 2010 年毕业于西南政法大学，深耕刑事领域十余年，办理经济犯罪、职务犯罪案件逾百起。在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，其办理的 L 某涉嫌组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪一案，多家同行认为“脱黑难度极大”，黄婧主任逐字逐句梳理卷宗、抠出证据漏洞，最终帮助当事人全案脱黑，涉案财产得以解封。以精细化证据审\u003Cbr>查与定性辩护，在西南地区涉黑涉恶案件中实现脱黑摘帽与财产保护的双重突破。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（昆明）律师事务所创始人、主任黄婧律师系卓安刑事合规专业委员会委员，2026 年获评「LegalOne 西部地区法律大奖：杰出律师（刑事业务）」。于 2022 年通过国家高级企业合规师资格考试，取得《企业合规师职业能力证书》，同年荣获《团体标准起草人证书》；2021 年被聘为《中小企业合规评价认证标准》起草人，并担任多家企业合规法律顾问；2013 年参加云南十大律师法律服务团活动，获奖励证书，表彰其为依法治省作出的贡献。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789722966232.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、191-4193-8454\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（昆明）律师事务所地址：云南省昆明市五华区小康大道88号和谐广场B座第49层4909室\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-18 17:58:56",{"id":207,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":207,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":10,"jsonLd":639},"【卓安解答】我在昆明放贷收违约金，怎么就成了“套路贷”涉黑涉恶？ - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","——不看利息高不高，看“虚增债务、恶意制造违约、非法占有目的”：借贷行为罪与非罪的 10 个真问题 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在昆明做民间借贷，走的是正规流程：签合同、留身份信息、银行转账，抵押手续也办了。合同里写了逾期违约金，日万分之五。” “","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F543",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"mainEntity":644},"FAQPage",[645],{"@type":646,"name":647,"acceptedAnswer":648},"Question","——不看利息高不高，看“虚增债务、恶意制造违约、非法占有目的”：借贷行为罪与非罪的 10 个真问题 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在昆明做民间借贷，走的是正规流程：签合同、留身份信息、银行转账，抵押手续也办了。合同里写了逾期违约金，日万分之五。” “去年有三个客户还不上钱，我起诉了，法院也判了。结果今年公安找上门，说我涉嫌‘套路",{"@type":649,"text":650},"Answer","——不看利息高不高，看“虚增债务、恶意制造违约、非法占有目的”：借贷行为罪与非罪的 10 个真问题 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在昆明做民间借贷，走的是正规流程：签合同、留身份信息、银行转账，抵押手续也办了。合同里写了逾期违约金，日万分之五。” “去年有三个客户还不上钱，我起诉了，法院也判了。结果今年公安找上门，说我涉嫌‘套路贷’，还是恶势力。我实在想不通—— 钱是我真金白银借出去的，走的也是法院，怎么就成犯罪了？ ” “我承认我给过一些客户‘服务费’‘保证金’的讲法，也有人提前扣过一个月的利息。这些是不是就构成‘虚增债务’了？” 这三个问题指向同一个法律命题： 真实的民间借贷与“套路贷”之间的界线究竟在哪里？一个收了高额违约金、走了诉讼程序的出借人，什么时候会被认定为刑事犯罪？ 卓安（昆明）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。卓安律师团队累计办理涉黑涉"]