[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-539":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":207,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},539,"2026-09-18 18:03:33","【卓安解答】我在深圳做催收，公司按 KPI 考核业绩，会不会被认定成恶势力？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002Fc2e30ba5-bcdc-41c3-be5e-e85700936e91.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789723668760.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>——不看公司规模，看“纪律规约、层级管控、非法手段固化”：催收 KPI 与恶势力“组织特征”认定的 10 个真问题\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：问答文章\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年9月18日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>“我在深圳一家资产管理公司做催收，公司给我们定了 KPI：每月回款率不到 60% 就扣绩效、调岗，连续两个月垫底直接淘汰。组长还有团队返点。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“我们的活主要是打电话、发短信、寄催收函，也有同事去对方公司楼下坐着等。现在公司被查了，说涉嫌恶势力犯罪集团，我因为带一个小组，被认定成‘纠集者’。”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“我一没打人，二没上门闹事，就是按公司的考核指标干活。KPI 会不会被当成‘组织纪律’？我到底算不算这个恶势力的成员？”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>这三个问题指向同一个法律命题：在催收类涉恶案件里，公司的绩效考核与管理制度，在“恶势力组织特征”的认定中到底扮演什么角色？它会不会被当成“有组织、有纪律、有人管”的证明？\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师的每一次判断。卓安律师团队累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件，成功为 60 余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格。结合卓安（深圳）任忠孙主任团队办理催收类、追债类涉黑涉恶案件的经验，本文把当事人和家属最关心的 10 个问题一次说清。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、明确判断：KPI 本身不是罪，但它是“组织特征”的重要证据之一\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第一，恶势力的成立前提是“经常纠集在一起、多次实施违法犯罪活动”，而不是“公司管理严格”。\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2019 年两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》明确，恶势力是指经常纠集在一起，以暴力、威胁或者其他手段，在一定区域或者行业内多次实施违法犯罪活动，为非作恶，欺压百姓，扰乱经济、社会生活秩序，造成较为恶劣的社会影响，但尚未形成黑社会性质组织的违法犯罪组织。判断的落脚点是“行为”，不是“制度”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第二，KPI、话术手册、考核表这类材料，在办案中恰恰是“双向证据”。\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>它既可能被用来证明公司“有组织、有管理、有分工”，也可能被用来证明公司“划明了行为红线、严禁违法手段”。关键不在于文件名，而在于文件内容指向什么：如果话术里写的是“告知逾期后果、协商还款计划、依法主张权利”，那是正常催告；如果写的是“扬言揭发隐私、恶意举报、反复骚扰家属单位”，那就会被直接归入“软暴力”的手段范畴。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第三，“恶势力”与“黑社会性质组织”的分水岭，是“四个特征”是否齐备。\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>依据《刑法》第二百九十四条第五款，黑社会性质组织需要同时具备组织特征、经济特征、行为特征和危害性特征；而恶势力尚未达到这一程度。实践中大量案件争议的焦点，恰恰是控方把“企业化管理的催收公司”直接等同于“有组织犯罪”，跳过了两个层次的界限。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第四，不要把“员工”和“团伙成员”混为一谈。\u003C\u002Fstrong> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>层级低、入职晚、参与次数少、获利有限的人员，有很大空间争取不作为犯罪处理，或者在认定犯罪的范围内争取从犯、退赃退赔、认罪认罚。身处催收行业的人，真正需要守住的底线是：\u003Cstrong>规章制度不能成为你“知道违法还要干”的证据，而应当成为你“按规程办事、拒绝越线”的证据。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：这类案件的第一项工作不是求情，而是把“公司的管理制度”与“犯罪组织的纪律规约”切开，把“岗位职责”与“组织角色”切开。这两刀切不开，后面的从宽都很难谈。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、当事人和家属最关心的 10 个问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第1问｜公司搞 KPI 考核、末位淘汰，是不是就等于“有明确的组织者、领导者”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>不是。组织特征的核心是“人数较多、有明确的组织者领导者、骨干成员基本固定”，而不是“有管理制度”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《刑法》第二百九十四条第五款把组织特征表述为“形成较稳定的犯罪组织，人数较多，有明确的组织者、领导者，骨干成员基本固定”。而《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》进一步说明，恶势力一般为 3 人以上，纠集者相对固定。“纠集者相对固定”讲的是围绕犯罪活动形成的稳定关系，不是公司里谁给谁派活。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>任何一家有规模的企业都有岗位层级、考核办法、奖惩规则。如果“有层级、有考核”就等于“有组织”，那么所有企业都符合，这显然不是立法本意。真正需要检验的是：这套层级是不是用来组织、指挥违法犯罪，人员之间的稳定关系是不是围绕违法犯罪活动形成的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：把公司的组织架构图（谁向谁汇报、谁管业务、谁管人事）与指控中的“组织分工”逐项对照，指出哪些属于正常经营职能、哪些才被指控为犯罪分工。这份对照表往往是辩护的起点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第2问｜催收话术里写了“施压点”“施压节奏”，会不会被当成犯罪手段的固化证据？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>取决于话术内容本身是否指向违法手段，而不是取决于有没有“压力”二字。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>2019 年两高两部《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》把“软暴力”归纳为：通过发送信息、拨打电话、扬言传播疾病、揭发隐私、恶意举报、诬告陷害、破坏、霸占财物等方法，对他人形成心理强制、威慑，足以使他人产生恐惧，进而实现非法目的的行为。可以看出，被列举的都是“威胁性内容”，而不是“沟通频次”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>“施压”是一个业务词汇。打在电话里说“你逾期了，我们会上报征信，可能进入诉讼程序”，这是对真实后果的告知；说“你不还钱，我们就去你孩子学校门口等你”，这就是软暴力。同一份培训材料里可能两者都有，所以不能整体认定，必须按句子、按步骤拆开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：第一时间固定话术手册的完整版本、版本时间、培训签到记录，而不是只看侦查机关摘录的那几句。\u003Cstrong>被摘录的往往是十条里的那一条，剩下九条才是你的证据。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第3问｜我只是按公司安排打电话，从没见过客户，也会被算进“多次实施违法犯罪”吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>会进入审查范围，但“每一次”都必须被单独评价。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《关于办理实施“软暴力”的刑事案件若干问题的意见》规定，多次以软暴力手段实施违法犯罪活动的，可以作为认定恶势力或者黑社会性质组织的依据之一。这里的“多次”是逐次累加的事实认定，而非概括推定。也就是说，控方要证明的是“你打了哪几次、每次说了什么、造成什么后果”，而不是“你在那家公司上过班，所以公司做的事都算你一份”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务中辩护的常见切口就在这里：把通话记录、录音、短信、微信按时间列成表，逐条标注内容是“常规催告”还是“越线内容”，把大量的常规催告从“违法犯罪次数”中剥离出去。很多时候，指控的“几十次”经过逐条核对，真正可能被认定为越线的只有几次。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：请家属尽早把当事人手机里的通话记录、录音、聊天记录原样保存，不要删除、不要整理、不要“只留对自己有利的”。\u003Cstrong>删掉的每一条，都会在法庭上变成对你不利的推定。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第4问｜组长、主管算不算“纠集者”？“纠集者”和“积极参加者”差在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>这是这类案件身份认定的核心问题，直接决定量刑档次。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>根据《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》，恶势力的纠集者，是指组织、策划、指挥违法犯罪活动的人；恶势力的其他成员，是指知道或者应当知道与他人经常纠集在一起是为了共同实施违法犯罪，仍按照纠集者的组织、指挥参与违法犯罪活动的人员。两者的区别在于是否起到组织、策划、指挥作用，而不在于名片上的职务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>一个催收组长可能同时具备两种身份属性：在公司里他管几个人的排班和业绩，在指控事实里他是“指挥”。辩护要做的，是把二者切开——他下达的是“今天打哪几个客户、完成多少回款”，还是“去几个人、用什么话术施压、拿不到钱就去他家”。\u003Cstrong>前一种指令指向经营指标，后一种指令才指向犯罪活动。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：调取组内的排班表、任务分配表、业绩通报，用客观记录说明“指挥”的实际内容。这比当庭解释“我只是个小组长”有力得多。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第5问｜公司有合规部门、有红线培训，能不能用来自证清白？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>能，但必须与“实际执行行为”对照，否则会被认定为“纸面合规”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《反有组织犯罪法》确立了行业治理与预防性制度的基本框架，要求相关行业经营者建立防范有组织犯罪渗透的制度，并对从业人员的违法行为及时处置。也就是说，企业建立合规制度本身是法律鼓励的；但在刑事个案中，制度文件的意义在于“是否被真正执行”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>有效的证据组合通常是三层：一是制度层面（催收行为规范、禁止性条款、投诉处理办法）；二是执行层面（违规人员的处理记录、扣罚通报、解除合同文件）；三是效果层面（客户投诉数量与处理结果、监管部门的检查记录）。如果只有第一层，办案机关往往会认为“这只是应付检查的文本”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：对照《反有组织犯罪法》的预防性要求整理企业的合规台账。\u003Cstrong>合规不是辩护时的“挡箭牌”，而是经营时就该留下的“日常记录”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第6问｜涉案金额怎么算？“回款提成”会不会全部计入我的犯罪数额？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>不会自动全部计入，要逐笔审查款项性质与归属。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>以敲诈勒索为例，《刑法》第二百七十四条要求行为人具有非法占有他人财物的目的。如果被催收的债务本身真实存在（如真实的借款、欠款），行为人对这部分款项主张权利时就难以认定非法占有目的；只有当索要的数额明显超出债务本身，或者债务根本不存在时，超出的部分才可能被计入犯罪数额。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>同时，依据《刑法》第六十四条，违法所得应予追缴或责令退赔。这里的关键是“违法所得”的界定——通过合法债权实现的部分，与通过威胁手段额外索取的部分，性质不同；进入公司账户的资金与个人实际取得的资金，归属也不同。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：把金额做成一张三栏表——\u003Cstrong>合法债权部分、超出债权部分、个人实际取得部分\u003C\u002Fstrong>。这张表做出来，核减空间往往一目了然。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第7问｜公司被认定恶势力犯罪集团，我作为底层员工会被“连带”吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>刑法上没有“连带犯罪”，只有分别评价。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>刑事责任的基本原则是罪责自负。《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》要求，对恶势力的成员，应当根据其在违法犯罪活动中的地位、作用、参与程度、获利情况等分别处理，不得简单以组织名义定罪量刑。也就是说，公司整体被认定，不等于每个员工都按同一标准处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>办案中的差异非常大：有的员工只参与少量常规催收，可能被作不起诉处理；有的员工负责设计话术、培训新人、分配任务，就会被认定作用较大。\u003Cstrong>决定命运的不是你在哪家公司上班，而是你在指控事实中具体做了什么。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：家属不要替当事人“概括回答”。向律师说明情况时，按时间、按事件逐条说，不清楚的就说不知道。\u003Cstrong>模糊的陈述会被办案机关自动往重里理解。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第8问｜当事人在深圳被带走，公司总部在外地，会不会要跑到外地去打官司？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>管辖以犯罪地和主要犯罪地为主，异地协作是常态，不必提前恐慌。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《刑事诉讼法》规定，刑事案件由犯罪地的人民法院管辖，如果由被告人居住地的人民法院审判更为适宜的，可以由被告人居住地的人民法院管辖。涉及多地的共同犯罪，通常由主要犯罪地管辖，其他地方的案件可以并案或移送。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对家属来说，现实问题是“会见、阅卷、开庭要来回去”。这正是卓安“总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同”机制要解决的问题——卓安在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地设有分所，跨地区案件可以就近会见、就近阅卷并调动全国资源。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：委托前先确认三件事——办案机关在哪个城市、当事人羁押在哪个看守所、主办律师多久能到场会见一次。这三件事决定沟通效率。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第9问｜被带走之前或之后，公司让“统一口径”“清理聊天记录”，能不能做？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>绝对不能做，这是把行政风险直接变成刑事风险的操作。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>《刑法》第三百零七条第二款规定，帮助当事人毁灭、伪造证据，情节严重的，构成帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪；第三百一十条规定，明知是犯罪的人而为其提供隐藏处所、财物，帮助其逃匿或者作假证明包庇的，构成窝藏、包庇罪。在共同犯罪案件中，串供、统一口径本身，还可能被认定为妨害作证或伪证。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>更现实的问题是：在法律评价上，“统一口径”会被办案机关直接解读为“明知违法”。你本来只是在边缘地带按公司指令办事，一旦参与清理记录，就等于亲手写下了一份“我知道这是犯罪”的说明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：正确做法是\u003Cstrong>原样固定、不作改动、如实陈述\u003C\u002Fstrong>。聊天记录、工作群通知、考核文件，都是中性的客观证据，留着比删掉价值大得多。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>第10问｜什么信号说明应该立刻请律师，而不是再等等？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所解读：\u003Cstrong>三个信号出现任何一个，就不要再等。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>第一，公司多名同事在同一时间段被带走，或者你被要求“随时到案、保持联系”——这说明案件已经进入刑事程序，只是暂未采取强制措施。第二，收到《调取证据通知书》《传唤证》或者监察机关的谈话通知。第三，你的名字出现在《起诉意见书》里，或者你的银行账户、微信支付被冻结。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>刑事程序里有几个时间节点对结果影响很大：被刑事拘留后的 37 天，是争取不批捕的关键窗口；审查起诉阶段，是争取不起诉、变更起诉罪名的主要阶段。\u003Cstrong>案件越往后走，可供调整的空间越小。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 《刑事诉讼法》第一百四十五条规定，对于犯罪情节轻微、依照刑法规定不需要判处刑罚或者免除刑罚的，人民检察院可以作出不起诉决定——这一条的适用，前提是前面阶段已经把事实和情节讲清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>实务要点：请律师不是“认罪”，而是让专业的人在该说话的时候说话。\u003Cstrong>沉默和乱说话，在这类案件里代价一样大。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、事实与材料核对表：想争取从宽，先把这些材料备齐\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>不同阶段的材料价值不同。\u003Cstrong>侦查阶段优先提供能证明职位、职责、参与程度的客观记录，审查起诉阶段再补入金额与情节证据。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">用途说明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">任职与职责\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">劳动合同、岗位说明书、员工名册、组织架构图、排班表\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明岗位性质与职责范围，区分管理职能与犯罪分工\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">制度文件\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">催收行为规范、话术手册完整版、合规红线文件、培训签到记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明公司是否划定了禁止性行为边界及其执行情况\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">行为记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">通话记录、催收录音、短信与微信记录、上门登记表、投诉处理台账\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">逐条评价行为性质与次数，剥离常规催告部分\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">金额证据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">借款与债权凭证、还款流水、公司账户流水、个人提成记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">核减犯罪数额，区分合法债权、超出部分与个人实际所得\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">强制措施文书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">传唤证、拘留通知书、逮捕通知书、起诉意见书\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">确认罪名、所处阶段与办案机关，判断辩护窗口\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">角色证据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">任务分配群记录、业绩通报、奖惩文件、员工证言\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">确定个人在指控事实中的地位与作用，争取从犯认定\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">财产与家庭\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">婚姻登记、亲属关系证明、共同财产凭证、病历、就学证明\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">申请解除对合法财产与必要生活费用的冻结\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">合规记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">内部调查记录、违规处理通报、监管检查记录、客户投诉统计\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"199\">证明制度被实际执行，避免被认定为纸面合规\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>注意：以上材料请提供原件或清晰复印件、照片。\u003Cstrong>不要自行修改、补签、倒签日期，也不要删除聊天记录与通话记录。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 真实是这件事的底线，一旦有材料被查出造假，或有关键电子数据被删除，整个家庭的从宽主张都会受到严重影响。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、卓安办理过的涉黑涉恶案例\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：沙井“龙哥”组织、领导黑社会性质组织案 —— 组织者认定为参与者，并打掉故意杀人罪指控】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 该案号称深圳建市以来最大的涉黑涉恶案件，任忠孙主任的当事人被指控为该组织的骨干组织者，同时面临故意杀人罪的指控，属于典型的“重罪叠加”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安任忠孙主任花费大量时间梳理全案证据，逐一拆解控方的组织架构与作用力逻辑，围绕组织特征、行为特征以及当事人在组织中的实际参与程度展开质证，并对故意杀人罪的指控单独组织专项辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院将当事人的“组织者”定性改为“参与者”并据此从轻处罚，同时\u003Cstrong>打掉了对故意杀人罪的指控\u003C\u002Fstrong>，当事人获得轻判。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债涉网络寻衅滋事案 —— 跨省追究下企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 广东某企业家组织公司为金融机构开展追债业务，被跨省追究涉嫌网络寻衅滋事罪，法定量刑在五年以上，公司多名员工同时被卷入。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安任忠孙主任带领的团队从债权真实来源、委托关系合法性、追债行为的具体方式与网络寻衅滋事罪的构成要件逐项切入，并对每一名员工的知晓范围、参与环节与获利情况分别提出意见，\u003Cstrong>坚持把单位行为与个人责任分开评价，避免以公司整体行为替代对每一名员工的个别审查。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 经团队有效辩护，\u003Cstrong>企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>。本案说明：身处催收、追债链条中的人，并非一旦立案就只能“认账”，债权基础与行为边界始终是可以争的核心辩点。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）—— 审查起诉阶段打掉聚众斗殴罪，整体刑期有效控制】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 杨某经营一家小额贷款公司，在收取贷款过程中采取限制人身自由、恐吓等方式催收，并牵涉多起打架斗殴事件，被指控寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪，并被认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队在审查起诉阶段针对法定刑最重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致比对与质证，出具专门法律意见书，\u003Cstrong>成功促使检察院撤回该项起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>；在审判阶段，团队邀请刑法专家论证，围绕《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的催收非法债务罪与寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪的法条竞合关系提出意见，反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院最终未对杨某适用更为严苛的重罪重罚，数罪并罚\u003Cstrong>仅决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案 —— 击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑，重罪脱逃仅判一年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 陈某被指控组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪等。控方认为其纠集多名同学、老乡形成“不成文规矩”的团伙，逐步演变为黑社会性质组织。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队从“组织特征”切入，指出该团伙系同学、老乡基于哥们义气形成的松散社交关系，\u003Cstrong>缺乏明确的帮规帮纪与经济管控特征，不具备《刑法》规定的组织特征\u003C\u002Fstrong>，坚决作不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪的剥离辩护，并主动与侦查机关、检察官及承办法官沟通。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院全盘采纳辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>打掉涉黑罪名\u003C\u002Fstrong>，当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金五万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：孙某等 45 人特大涉黑案 —— 突破量刑建议，刑期与罚金双项削减】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 孙某被控参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭伪造证据罪等。在当事人未认罪认罚的情况下，检方量刑建议为十年六个月、罚金二十万元，后变更为九至十一年。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队运用禁止重复评价原则与从属性论证：提出聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应被拔高认定为涉黑组织的“标志性事件”；指出销毁证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪重复评价；同时主张孙某未参与实质性违法犯罪活动，不应被认定为积极参加者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 法院“踩着建议刑的最低线”，决定对孙某执行有期徒刑九年，并将\u003Cstrong>罚金从二十万元大幅降至十三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。本案共涉 45 名被告人，历经 5 天庭前会议、10 天正式庭审。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：H 某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案 —— 涉黑降格为恶势力犯罪集团，两项罪名脱罪，量刑大幅削减】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> H 某被控参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等，指控情节严重，量刑在十年以上。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队以当事人资金独立、行为自主、不存在豢养成员的证据为基础，\u003Cstrong>逐项推翻控方关于黑社会性质组织四个特征的认定\u003C\u002Fstrong>，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件定性由黑社会性质组织\u003Cstrong>降格为恶势力犯罪集团\u003C\u002Fstrong>，非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项指控未被法院认定，\u003Cstrong>量刑从十年以上降至有期徒刑八年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>（案例说明：以上案例均已脱敏，仅用于说明审查路径与辩护方法。具体案件事实、辩护工作与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准，既往个案不构成对任何案件的结果承诺。）\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、卓安在涉黑涉恶案件上的核心优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势一：专注刑事，只做刑事，拒绝万金油】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安（深圳）律师事务所坚持只做刑事。深圳分所以“人文 × 科技”双轮驱动，立足大湾区创新特质，整合高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、刑事专业律师等优质资源，专注办理重大、疑难、复杂刑事案件。卓安把资源与精力全部倾注于刑事领域，按犯罪类别与程序性质细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队。催收类涉恶案件最忌讳“用民事思维办刑事案”，也最忌讳“什么案都接”的通用型律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势二：全国化一体化，总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 催收与不良资产业务天然跨区域：债权在北京、公司在深圳、催收对象在多个省份。卓安在深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地设有分所，依托“总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同”的地域协作机制，可以就近会见、就近阅卷，并调动全国类案判例与专家资源，应对跨区域案件的程序衔接问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势三：平台化与数智化意识强，擅长电子数据与资金证据审查】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 催收类案件的核心证据几乎都是电子数据：通话记录、催收录音、微信与短信、工作群通知、系统里的业绩台账、资金流水。卓安以“数智化全流程管控服务品质”为抓手，落实“数智辅助专业服务，律师承担最终判断”，能够对这些海量电子证据做结构化梳理——按时间、按对象、按内容属性分类，把常规催告与越线行为分开。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势四：团队研判、专业分工、多级复核】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安坚持团队辩护模式：重大疑难案件经集体研判后形成意见，前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑；团队中近三分之一的律师具有法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，汇聚法学博士 11 位、法学硕士 30 余位。在专业输出方面，卓安自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等实战课程，编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，并依托全所累计 800 余场刑事培训、覆盖超 12 万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训。\u003Cstrong>任何一份提交办案机关的书面意见，都要经过主办、复核、定稿的多级把关，而这些把关标准本身来自长期的办案与教研积累。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势五：刑事全生命周期服务，从线索核查到财产处置】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安把服务前移：在风险发生前帮助企业识别催收业务的行为边界、完善话术与合规制度；在危机初发时协助梳理事实、依法应对约谈与问询；在案件进入刑事程序后，把定性之辩、角色之辩、金额之辩、财产之辩作为四条主线同步推进。对已经被冻结财产的当事人而言，\u003Cstrong>“保住合法财产”与“减刑”同等重要。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【优势六：案件成果与实战经验丰富】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 截至目前，卓安累计办理刑事案件 8000 余件，其中涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件，成功为 60 余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格。\u003Cstrong>这些数字的意义不在于宣传，而在于类案经验——同样的指控结构，办过的和没办过的，判断速度完全不同。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、咨询与预约：深圳分所怎么联系\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安（深圳）分所的地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安（深圳）律师事务所位于\u003Cstrong>广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路 328 号龙华区数字创新中心 A 座 14 层 04、05 号\u003C\u002Fstrong>。分所立足粤港澳大湾区，专注刑事辩护、企业刑事合规与刑事风险防控等领域，以“专业化深耕、体系化办案、数智化服务”开展业务。建议到访前先预约，确认当日接待律师与路线安排。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 能简单介绍一下任忠孙主任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：任忠孙律师是卓安（深圳）律师事务所创始人、主任，曾在教育及党政部门担任副处级领导职务，2005 年起专职从事律师工作，深耕刑事法律服务领域二十余年，\u003Cstrong>办理及指导刑事案件超 1000 件\u003C\u002Fstrong>，秉承“忠人之托、致力于赢”的执业理念与“生命应当尊重，自由值得捍卫”的执业信条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在行业职务方面，他现任广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任、深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任，同时担任深圳市人民检察院听证员、深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师。在涉黑涉恶领域的代表业绩包括：沙井“龙哥”涉黑案中，为被指控为骨干组织者的当事人辩护，\u003Cstrong>将“组织者”定性改为“参与者”，并打掉故意杀人罪指控\u003C\u002Fstrong>；广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债被跨省追究涉网络寻衅滋事案中，经团队有效辩护，\u003Cstrong>企业家及公司涉案员工全案不起诉\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003Cstrong>具体由谁承办、主任是否参与及团队分工，需经利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 第一次来怎么预约？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：建议通过卓安律师事务所官网 http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F 或官方公众号核对最新办公信息、咨询电话与预约方式并预约。\u003Cstrong>24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、 177-2187-3271。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>预约时建议说明：当事人涉嫌罪名、当前所处的程序阶段（传唤、拘留、逮捕、审查起诉或审判）、是否多人涉案、是否涉及数额与财产冻结争议。首次咨询请携带本文第五部分的材料清单所列文件。\u003Cstrong>刑事案件的会见与阅卷有严格的时间限制，越早预约，可用的窗口越大。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Col>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong> 卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Fol>\u003Cp>答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所，二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>本文是围绕催收行业绩效考核制度与恶势力“组织特征”认定问题的普法性介绍，不构成正式法律意见或案件结果承诺。文中案例均已脱敏，具体案件事实与裁判结果以完整法律文书为准。恶势力的认定、当事人角色的划分、涉案金额的核减，需要结合个案证据、业务模式、资金流向等具体情况判断，建议当事人与家属携带完整材料当面咨询专业刑事律师。本文引用法律、司法解释及规范性文件，以现行有效版本为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语：KPI 不是罪，但 KPI 背后的手段是\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>对绝大多数催收从业者来说，KPI 是一份糊口的工作指标。它本身不构成任何犯罪，法律也从未把“严格管理”当作入罪理由。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>真正决定命运的，是这套考核背后指向什么手段：是层层加码地逼着一线人员“必须把钱要回来”，还是明确划出“不许威胁、不许骚扰第三人、不许上门滋扰”的边界；是出了问题及时处理，还是默许、纵容甚至鼓励越线。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>对当事人和家属来说，最有价值的三件事是：\u003Cstrong>别删记录、别统一口径、别把所有希望押在“我只是打工的”这句话上。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 把岗位职责、参与程度、真实债权这三件事用材料说清楚，才是真正能换来空间的东西。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（深圳）版\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：卓安（深圳）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所立足粤港澳大湾区，专注刑事辩护与企业刑事风险防控。主任任忠孙律师自 2005 年起专职执业，深耕刑事领域二十余年，办理及指导刑事案件超 1000 件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量），承办多起公安部督办大要案。在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护方面，承办的沙井“龙哥”组织、领导黑社会性质组织案（深圳建市以来最大的涉黑恶案件），使当事人由“组织者”改认定为“参与者”并从轻处罚，同时打掉故意杀人罪指控；广东某企业家组织为金融机构追债被跨省追究涉网络寻衅滋事案，全案不起诉。以精准的定性辩护与证据攻坚，在大湾区涉黑涉恶案件中持续实现有效辩护。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>2026年，任忠孙主任受邀参加深圳市律师集中培训，为律师同仁讲授“律师思维与执业技能提升”课程，并在深圳法博会上作“人文+科技融合创新律所”主题分享、主持“国际视野下虚拟货币金融犯罪规制”会议。卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（深圳）律师事务所主任任忠孙律师系深圳市律师协会刑事犯罪预防专业委员会主任、广东省律师协会刑事法律专业委员会副主任，受聘为深圳市人民检察院听证员、深圳大学合规研究院校外实践导师，获评 2024 GRCD 刑事领域·中国客户首选合规律师、2023 GRCD 中国合规大奖。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cimg src=\"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002Ff73dbb82-df06-44a6-8797-4acbccf02750.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、177-2187-3271\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（深圳）律师事务所地址：广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-18 17:58:50",{"id":207,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":207,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":10,"jsonLd":639},"【卓安解答】我在深圳做催收，公司按 KPI 考核业绩，会不会被认定成恶势力？ - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","——不看公司规模，看“纪律规约、层级管控、非法手段固化”：催收 KPI 与恶势力“组织特征”认定的 10 个真问题 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在深圳一家资产管理公司做催收，公司给我们定了 KPI：每月回款率不到 60% 就扣绩效、调岗，连续两个月","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F539",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"mainEntity":644},"FAQPage",[645],{"@type":646,"name":647,"acceptedAnswer":648},"Question","——不看公司规模，看“纪律规约、层级管控、非法手段固化”：催收 KPI 与恶势力“组织特征”认定的 10 个真问题 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在深圳一家资产管理公司做催收，公司给我们定了 KPI：每月回款率不到 60% 就扣绩效、调岗，连续两个月垫底直接淘汰。组长还有团队返点。” “我们的活主要是打电话、发短信、寄催收函，也",{"@type":649,"text":650},"Answer","——不看公司规模，看“纪律规约、层级管控、非法手段固化”：催收 KPI 与恶势力“组织特征”认定的 10 个真问题 内容类型：问答文章 发布时间：2026年9月18日 一、先看一个几乎每个当事人都可能遇到的场景 “我在深圳一家资产管理公司做催收，公司给我们定了 KPI：每月回款率不到 60% 就扣绩效、调岗，连续两个月垫底直接淘汰。组长还有团队返点。” “我们的活主要是打电话、发短信、寄催收函，也有同事去对方公司楼下坐着等。现在公司被查了，说涉嫌恶势力犯罪集团，我因为带一个小组，被认定成‘纠集者’。” “我一没打人，二没上门闹事，就是按公司的考核指标干活。KPI 会不会被当成‘组织纪律’？我到底算不算这个恶势力的成员？” 这三个问题指向同一个法律命题：在催收类涉恶案件里，公司的绩效考核与管理制度，在“恶势力组织特征”的认定中到底扮演什么角色？它会不会被当成“有组织、有纪律、有人管”的证明？ 卓安（深圳）律师事务所坚持做“有温度、有力度的刑事法律服务专业品牌”，一心一意做好刑事法律服务，落实“刑事法律服务专业化、产品化、团队化品牌”的定位；这份只做刑事、拒绝万金油的执业选择，贯穿卓安律师"]