[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-506":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,165,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},283,"Q某涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其进行罪轻辩护，精准梳理量刑情节，终 获一审法庭从轻处罚","一、案情简介 被告人秦某某系某集团有限公司财务副总监，2017年4月，某集团有限公司与中间人陈某某签订融资顾问协议，2017年8月18日，被告人秦某某利用其作为该融资项目经办人的职务便利，收受中间人陈某某给予的回扣共计人民币193万元。当日","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},282,"Z某涉嫌行贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 曾某任项目销售经理期间，与黄某商议收取一定费用，给予不符合购房条件的人办理“购房资格”证明。2016---2017年初，曾某让业务员共收代办费47.5万元，并授意杨某制作假的社保证明、收入证明、用工合同等资料。曾某向黄某、刘某",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},281,"X某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护二审改判罪名并获轻判","一、案情简介 2014年7月中旬至11月中旬期间，被告人许某、梁某分别担任四川某公司青白江分公司经理、会计、出纳。该公司以投资为幌子，向群众宣传投资，收到资款后，公司负责人杨某、韩某未进行实际投资，投资款被分赃、耗用。2015年7月20日，",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},280,"D某涉嫌集资诈骗罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人杜某系某包装公司、成都某公司的实际控制人，在该两公司背负大量债务、无经营资金的情况下，融资700余万元，造成损失585万余元，涉嫌集资诈骗罪。 二、办案过程 因本案案情重大复杂，为及时了解案",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":10,"summary":135,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},279,"X某等涉嫌开设赌场罪，团队律师为其成功辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 2015年6月至2017年7月19日间，肖某等人先后与\"商务\"共谋通过开设网络赌博游戏平台，利用\"商务模式（即出售游戏币，组织银商与玩家之家承兑游戏币为人民币的模式）\"从中非法获利，三大赌博平台共计非法获利11.3842亿元。",{"id":137,"title":138,"thumbnail":10,"summary":139,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},278,"P某涉嫌骗取贷款罪、非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 成都市人民检察院《起诉书》指控被告人彭某作为某公司法定代表人，未对其他公司提供的抵押物及还款能力进行核实，且自己公司不具有还款能力的情况下，伙同他人采取虚构贷款用途、伪造申贷材料的方式骗取贷款，致使银行巨额资金无法收回。某公司",{"id":141,"title":142,"thumbnail":10,"summary":143,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},277,"X某涉嫌受贿罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判   ","一、案情简介 2018年2月14日，夏某因涉嫌受贿罪被四川省监察委员会立案调查，同日采取留置措施，20年5月11日，经阆中市人民检察院决定被阆中市公安局执行逮捕，同日由省监察委向省检察院移送审查起诉，省检察院将本案移交阆中市人民检察院办理。",{"id":145,"title":146,"thumbnail":10,"summary":147,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该",{"id":149,"title":150,"thumbnail":10,"summary":151,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":153,"title":154,"thumbnail":10,"summary":155,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":157,"title":158,"thumbnail":10,"summary":159,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":161,"title":162,"thumbnail":163,"summary":164,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":166,"title":167,"thumbnail":10,"summary":168,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":207,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},506,"2026-09-17 17:43:28","【卓安解答】我在重庆开夜总会雇了几个大哥当保安，醉汉闹事他们打了人，我算恶势力首要分子吗？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F17\u002F72e7318a-0257-46f8-9014-4c4eba44eca6.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789635563142.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：涉黑涉恶｜问答\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发文时间：2026年09月17日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>先给结论：场所内发生打人事件，经营者并不当然被认定为恶势力首要分子，但“雇了谁、怎么管、怎么结算”这三件事会把你的责任放大或缩小。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 恶势力的认定不是看场所出了几次事，而是看是否存在\u003Cstrong>“经常纠集在一起、以暴力威胁或其他手段多次实施违法犯罪、为非作恶欺压百姓”\u003C\u002Fstrong>的组织性与行为性特征。依据两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》，判断重点是“纠集者相对固定、成员三人以上、多次共同实施违法犯罪”。\u003Cstrong>场所保安打人，可能构成故意伤害罪、寻衅滋事罪或聚众斗殴罪，但这属于具体罪名层面的评价；经营者要不要为它承担“恶势力首要分子”的责任，取决于你是否知情、是否授意、是否从违法行为中获利、是否为它提供了组织依托。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（重庆）律师事务所与吴亮律师建议\u003C\u002Fstrong>：事发后第一件事不是找人打招呼，而是\u003Cstrong>固定证据\u003C\u002Fstrong>——保护\u003Cstrong>保安服务合同、保安员从业资格材料、排班与考勤记录、工资与报酬发放凭证、场所监控原始存储、事件当班的岗位安排、现场处置记录、与被害人协商赔偿的书面材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>，再按“\u003Cstrong>人员来源—岗位职责—管理方式—报酬结算—事件经过—事后处置\u003C\u002Fstrong>”六条线还原事实；\u003Cstrong>本文面向重庆娱乐场所、餐饮、KTV、酒吧、洗浴等场所的经营者、股东与家属\u003C\u002Fstrong>，解答保安致伤事件中经营者责任的边界、正当防卫与互殴的区分，以及场所安保合规的整改方向。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、重庆娱乐场所内保与涉恶风险：12个核心问答\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：保安把闹事醉汉打伤，我会被认定为恶势力首要分子吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：不当然被认定。\u003Cstrong>恶势力首要分子（纠集者）的认定要求你对违法犯罪活动起组织、策划、指挥作用，而不是对场所内一切突发事件负责。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 如果保安是临时自行处置、你既不知情也未授意，且事后主动报警、送医、赔偿，一般不宜认定你为纠集者。但如果存在“事先交代动手别怕”“事后统一口径、代付赔偿封口”“按月给动手的人加钱”这类情形，就可能被认为具有组织性与利益分配的关联。\u003Cstrong>判断的关键不是职位，而是知情与授意的证据。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：正当防卫、防卫过当与故意伤害，界线在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：依据《刑法》第二十条，为使国家、公共利益、本人或他人的人身、财产和其他权利免受正在进行的不法侵害而采取的制止行为，属于正当防卫，不负刑事责任；\u003Cstrong>明显超过必要限度造成重大损害的，是防卫过当，应当负刑事责任，但可以减轻或者免除处罚\u003C\u002Fstrong>。实务中区分的关键在三点：侵害是否“正在进行”、防卫是否针对侵害人、手段与强度是否与侵害相当。\u003Cstrong>醉汉徒手推搡，保安却持械猛击头部致重伤，通常会超出防卫限度；反之，多人围殴情形下的反击，认定防卫的空间明显更大。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 监控录像是这类案件最核心的证据，必须第一时间完整固定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：我以前雇过有前科的人当保安，会不会直接被认定为“纠集者”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：有前科不等于有组织。\u003Cstrong>认定纠集者需要结合“是否多次召集他人实施违法犯罪”“是否对成员有实际指挥管理”“是否形成相对固定的违法团伙”综合判断。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 单纯雇佣有前科人员从事保安工作，本身不违法；但如果这些人平时不上班、只负责“看场子”“摆平事”，报酬明显高于正常保安，且多次因场所纠纷动手，就可能被作为组织特征与经济特征的证据。\u003Cstrong>建议尽早梳理这些人员的实际到岗记录、岗位职责与实际工作内容，用客观记录说明他们是真实用工还是“挂名看场”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：《娱乐场所管理条例》对保安聘用有哪些禁止性规定？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：根据《娱乐场所管理条例》，娱乐场所\u003Cstrong>不得招用未成年人，不得招用曾犯有特定严重罪行的人员\u003C\u002Fstrong>，并应当按照规定配备保安人员；实践中还要求场所与依法设立的保安服务公司签订保安服务合同、由持证保安员上岗。\u003Cstrong>这类行政违规本身属于行政处罚范畴，但它会成为司法机关判断“场所管理是否失范”的重要材料。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 因此，规范做法是：与有资质的保安服务公司签约、核验保安员证、留存培训与考核记录，从源头上把行政风险与刑事风险同时降下来。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问5：保安打人算个人行为还是公司行为，责任怎么划分？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：要看行为是否“执行工作任务”。\u003Cstrong>在职务范围内、为维护经营秩序而实施的行为，可能被认定与单位管理相关；纯粹出于个人泄愤、与工作无关的斗殴，属于个人行为。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 但在刑事层面并不存在“公司行为就等于老板承担全部责任”的简单推导：老板是否构成犯罪，仍要看是否知情、授意、获利、纵容。民事责任上，员工因执行工作任务造成他人损害，由用人单位承担侵权责任，这与刑事责任的判断是两套逻辑，\u003Cstrong>不要把民事上的雇主责任直接等同于刑事上的组织责任。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问6：给“看场”的人发高额报酬，会不会被当成组织特征、经济特征？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：\u003Cstrong>会的，而且这是涉恶认定中最容易被抓住的一点。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 涉黑涉恶认定中的“经济特征”关注的是组织是否有稳定经济来源、是否豢养成员。如果报酬结构与正常薪酬体系明显脱节（如同一岗位远高于市场价、按“出场”“平事”次数单独结算、以现金或私人转账发放），就容易被解读为“豢养”。\u003Cstrong>应对办法是还原真实的经营与用工逻辑：谁定的薪酬、依据什么标准、是否与考勤挂钩、是否有社保与个税记录。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 用完整的薪酬制度证明报酬的合理性，比事后解释更有效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问7：场所内多次发生冲突，会不会累积成“多次实施违法犯罪”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：\u003Cstrong>统计数据本身不构成犯罪，但要逐一核查每次事件的性质。\u003C\u002Fstrong> “多次实施违法犯罪”要求每次行为本身已达到违法犯罪程度，轻微口角、被民警调解结案的治安纠纷，一般不宜直接作为恶势力的行为特征依据。应对时应当把每一次事件单独拆开：\u003Cstrong>发生时间、起因、参与人、处置结果（是否报警、是否行政处罚、是否调解）\u003C\u002Fstrong>，用台账形式还原全貌。\u003Cstrong>把“治安层面已处理完毕的小事”与“确有违法犯罪的个案”分开评价，是这类案件的核心辩点之一。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问8：进场费、看场费、酒水提成，哪些可能被认定为非法获利？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：要区分“经营性收入”与“违法犯罪所得”。\u003Cstrong>依法收取的场地租赁费、酒水与餐饮销售提成，属于正常经营收入；但如果向他人收取“保护费”“看场费”，或对场内经营活动强行抽成并以其提供“保护”“摆平纠纷”为对价，就可能被认定为非法获利。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依据《刑法》第二百九十四条与经济特征认定规则，非法获利数额是判断组织经济实力的重要依据。\u003Cstrong>建议逐笔还原收款名目、依据、对价与去向，把正常的经营性收入与来路不明的“看场费”严格分开。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问9：监控录像、排班表、工资流水能证明什么？怎么固定？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：这三类材料几乎决定案件走向。\u003Cstrong>监控能还原事件是怎么发生的（谁先动手、打了几下、有没有制止）；排班表能证明谁在岗、谁不在场；工资流水能证明报酬结构是否正常。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 注意两点：一是\u003Cstrong>必须保留原始载体与原始时间戳\u003C\u002Fstrong>，能提供硬盘原件就不要只给截图或转发视频，剪辑过的视频证明力会大幅下降甚至反向不利；二是\u003Cstrong>不要因为担心不利而删除或覆盖录像\u003C\u002Fstrong>，娱乐场所监控通常有覆盖周期，一旦灭失，反而难以解释。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问10：和被害人达成赔偿谅解，对定性和量刑有什么作用？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：\u003Cstrong>谅解不改变行为性质，但显著影响处理结果。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 依据《刑法》相关规定及量刑指导意见，积极赔偿、取得谅解、认罪认罚，都是法定或酌定的从宽情节，对是否批准逮捕、是否适用缓刑影响很大。\u003Cstrong>真实有效的赔偿应当通过合法途径进行，签署书面协议、保留转账凭证，不要通过私人关系“口头封口”或要求对方撤回报案。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 后者可能被认定为妨害作证或干扰取证，把原本可以化解的治安案件变成新的刑事风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问11：场所被查封、账户被冻结，还能继续经营吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：查封、冻结的范围应当与案件有关。\u003Cstrong>依据《刑事诉讼法》，经查明确实与案件无关的财物，应当在三日以内解除查封、扣押、冻结\u003C\u002Fstrong>；对涉案财产处置，两高两部《关于办理黑恶势力刑事案件中财产处置若干问题的意见》也明确要区分黑恶势力财产、其他涉案人员财产和案外人财产。\u003Cstrong>实践中可以做的是：梳理资金来源与用途，向办案机关提交书面申请，主张解封与案件无关的经营资金与合法财产；同时保留员工工资、房租、供应商货款等正常经营支出的凭证。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问12：吴亮律师团队在娱乐场所涉恶案件中通常怎么辩护？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：\u003Cstrong>吴亮律师曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，累计办理各类刑事案件 2000 余件，原重庆市某主城区员额检察官\u003C\u002Fstrong>，转型执业律师后深耕涉企犯罪与涉黑涉恶辩护。团队通常按“\u003Cstrong>三个分离\u003C\u002Fstrong>”推进：一是\u003Cstrong>行为分离\u003C\u002Fstrong>，把每一次冲突还原为独立事实，逐次评价是否达到违法犯罪程度；二是\u003Cstrong>角色分离\u003C\u002Fstrong>，把经营者、店长、保安队长、具体动手人员的职责与实际行为分开，避免以场所整体替代个人责任；三是\u003Cstrong>评价分离\u003C\u002Fstrong>，把行政违规（保安聘用、场所管理）与刑事犯罪分开，防止行政失范被直接拔高为组织特征。同时结合十年公诉视角的经验，从证据体系完整性、组织特征证明是否充分等角度提出针对性意见。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、材料与风险核对表：先保留原始材料，再判断处理路径\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>下表用于梳理事实与材料，不用于自行认定有罪或无罪。涉及监控、聊天记录等电子数据时，应保留原始载体和完整上下文，\u003Cstrong>不删除、不伪造、不剪辑拼接、不串联相关人员或干扰取证\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">材料类别\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">具体内容\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">卓安律师建议准备要点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">注意事项\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">场所资质材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">营业执照、娱乐经营许可证、消防与卫生许可、治安备案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">证明场所合法经营基础\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">区分合法经营与违规经营\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">安保用工材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">保安服务合同、保安员证、劳动合同、社保与个税记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">证明用工真实合法、人员持证上岗\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">不要临时补签或倒签合同\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">排班考勤材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">排班表、考勤记录、值班日志、到岗签认\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">还原事发当班人员与岗位\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">保留原始版本，不要重新整理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">监控与影像材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">场所监控原始录像、进出登记、门禁记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">还原事件经过与谁先动手\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">保留原始载体与时间戳，不剪辑\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">报酬结算材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">工资表、提成与绩效记录、转账凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">证明报酬结构是否正常合理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">不要转移资金，避免次生风险\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">事件处置材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">报警记录、出警回执、调解协议、送医与赔偿凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">证明事后处置是否及时得当\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">通过合法途径赔偿并保留凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">制度管理材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">场所管理制度、安保规范、培训与考核记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">证明是否存在合规管理\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">不要临时修改或重做\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">程序文书材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">询问通知、拘留与逮捕通知书、查封冻结清单\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">确认案件阶段与办案单位\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"149\">如有多份文书全部保留\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、卓安优势：吴亮律师团队处理娱乐场所涉恶风险的六个支点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【专注刑事，只做刑事——行为定性与角色定性分得清】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 娱乐场所案件往往一锅端：治安纠纷、故意伤害、寻衅滋事、组织卖淫、涉恶定性交织在一起，最容易发生“整体拔高”。卓安\u003Cstrong>把资源与精力全部倾注刑事领域\u003C\u002Fstrong>，按犯罪类别与程序性质细分出职务犯罪、经济犯罪、涉黑涉恶等核心罪名战队，以及死刑复核等专门程序战队。卓安（重庆）律师事务所是卓安全国布局的核心直营分所，\u003Cstrong>坚守“只做刑事案件”的核心定位\u003C\u002Fstrong>。吴亮律师凭借十年检察机关办案经验，对涉黑涉恶案件的审查起诉标准、组织特征与行为特征的司法认定有深入理解，能够把每一次冲突行为与每一名人员的实际作用逐一拆开评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【全国化、一体化服务能力——应对跨区域经营与联动协查】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 娱乐场所经营常存在多地门店、异地股东、跨区用工的情况，案件也可能被异地管辖。卓安强调总分所联动、属地响应、异地协同，在\u003Cstrong>成都、深圳、昆明、重庆、达州、西宁等地布局直营分所，坚持一体化管理\u003C\u002Fstrong>，重庆分所立足重庆、辐射川渝，可依据案件地域、材料和程序需求协调支持，把异地用工合同、门店经营数据与本地程序放进同一事实图审查（\u003Cstrong>协同不代表影响办案机关或承诺结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【平台化、数智化意识强——监控与结算数据快速还原】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 场所案件的核心证据高度依赖电子数据：监控录像、门禁记录、排班系统、POS 流水、微信与通话记录。卓安在做产业中台与数智化建设，不是传统律所的单兵打法，重视\u003Cstrong>原始载体、账号权限、时间戳与资金去向\u003C\u002Fstrong>的审查，既能识别剪辑、选择性截图造成的失真，也能指导经营者合法固定完整证据链，把“哪天谁在岗、谁先动手、钱怎么走”还原成可核对的事实。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【团队研判、专业分工、多级复核——重大案件集体辩护】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安实行“\u003Cstrong>控、辩、审、学\u003C\u002Fstrong>”四维办案体系：近三分之一的律师具有原法院、检察院、公安机关资深从业经历，汇聚 11 位法学博士及 30 余位法学硕士，重大疑难案件由前公诉人拆解指控逻辑、前法官把握裁判尺度、法学博士提供理论支撑。\u003Cstrong>吴亮律师的前检察官经历与团队的多重司法背景形成互补\u003C\u002Fstrong>，娱乐场所涉恶案件按组织特征、行为次数、非法获利、财产处置分别指派专人核查，再由多级复核把关并召开案件研讨会。卓安团队自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程，编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【公诉视角的反向证据审查——不捕、不诉经验可直接复用】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 吴亮律师\u003Cstrong>在检察机关十年间累计办理各类刑事案件 2000 余件，精通不批准逮捕、不起诉、取保候审、羁押必要性审查的审查重点与实务要点，熟悉侦查办案流程，熟知缓刑适用的裁判尺度\u003C\u002Fstrong>。这种“反向审查”能力在娱乐场所案件中尤其重要：\u003Cstrong>办案机关要证明“多次实施违法犯罪”，就必须每一次都达到证明标准；办案机关要证明“纠集者相对固定”，就必须有稳定的组织证据。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 从证据体系完整性的角度精准指出薄弱环节，是争取不批准逮捕、不起诉或降格处理的现实路径，\u003Cstrong>但律师不能承诺具体结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【刑行衔接与安保合规体系搭建——把风险挡在事件之前】\u003C\u002Fstrong> 娱乐场所的很多刑事风险，源头是行政层面的管理失范：保安无证上岗、监控覆盖不全、纠纷处置没有预案、赔偿不走书面程序。卓安的服务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、刑事风控、刑事控告全链条，可由律师帮助场所建立\u003Cstrong>保安服务采购与持证核查流程、冲突处置与报警规范、赔偿与调解书面化流程、监控留存与调取机制\u003C\u002Fstrong>，并配合合规培训落地。\u003Cstrong>吴亮律师现任重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事\u003C\u002Fstrong>，在企业合规与风险控制方面既有制度经验也有实操经验，能够把整改做成可用于应对调查的客观材料。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、卓安涉黑涉恶案件：可核验的争点与结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>卓安律师团队累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500 余件，成功为 60 余件案件实现“脱黑摘帽”或重罪降格。以下所列\u003Cstrong>均为涉黑涉恶案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 1：重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件 —— 从公诉标准反向审查罪名交叉与责任分层】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 本案系吴亮律师主办的重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件，属于扫黑除恶专项斗争中套路贷类型的重点案件，涉案人员多、罪名交叉、行为链条长，既涉及诈骗类犯罪，也涉及非法催收、寻衅滋事等关联行为。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：卓安\u003C\u002Fstrong> 吴亮律师依托十年检察机关审查起诉经验，从\u003Cstrong>公诉机关的证明标准出发反向审视全案证据体系\u003C\u002Fstrong>：逐罪核对每名涉案人员在具体环节中的行为与作用，区分组织者、积极参加者与一般参与者；针对套路贷案件中“民事借贷外观”与“非法占有目的”交织的特点，围绕资金来源、放贷模式、催收手段与获利去向逐项质证，避免以整体模式替代个人责任评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 案件依法审理终结，围绕组织特征、罪名交叉与主从作用差异提出的辩护意见得到充分表达，为当事人争取到与其实际作用相适应的处理结果（\u003Cstrong>具体以生效裁判为准\u003C\u002Fstrong>）。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 2：重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案 —— 严打背景下获最大限度从宽裁判】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 范某某被指控构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪，被认定为黑社会性质组织的组织者、领导者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队精细化拆解黑社会性质组织的各项特征，从\u003Cstrong>组织架构松散性、经济利益流向、危害性特征的区域局限性\u003C\u002Fstrong>展开质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在严打高压背景下，法院采纳部分个罪证据不足及量刑相关辩护意见，\u003Cstrong>有效降低量刑幅度，作出最大限度从宽裁判\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 3：杨某恶势力团伙催收非法债务案 —— 审查起诉阶段打掉聚众斗殴罪，数罪并罚仅执行五年】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 杨某经营小额贷款公司，催收中与部分逾期客户产生冲突，对部分长期坏账客户采取限制人身自由、恐吓等违法方式，并被牵连当地多起打架事件，被指控寻衅滋事罪、催收非法债务罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪，认定为恶势力团伙纠集者。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队召开案件研讨会、制作多版阅卷笔录分类施策。审查起诉阶段针对刑罚最重的聚众斗殴罪展开细致证据比对与质证并出具专门法律意见书；审判阶段\u003Cstrong>引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的催收非法债务罪，邀请刑法专家论证法条竞合问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>，反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高定罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 检察院在审查起诉阶段撤回对聚众斗殴罪的起诉，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年，并处罚金三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 4：董某涉黑四罪案 —— 剥离敲诈勒索重罪指控，论证索款目的合法性】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 董某被指控参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等四项罪名，指控事实包括参与非法拆迁、围堵工厂拉闸断电、以未能承揽工程为由强行索要“赔偿”等，案卷材料上千页。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师团队论证案涉团伙关系松散、无明确分工与帮规帮纪、无独立组织利益，不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征；同时\u003Cstrong>主张围堵工厂索要的系被拖欠的工程款、目的具有合法性，不能因手段过激就直接等同于敲诈勒索\u003C\u002Fstrong>，且主观上并无非法占有目的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在原本可能面临极为严厉刑罚的情况下，法院一审最终以参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、聚众扰乱社会秩序罪、敲诈勒索罪，\u003Cstrong>数罪并罚从轻决定执行有期徒刑十一年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 5：黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案 —— 退股纠纷中的民事维权与刑事敲诈边界】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 曾某、黄某与被害人程某共同出资设立的投资公司未实际经营，程某提出退股，双方就股本金退还多次协商未果，后在协商中以威胁方式迫使程某出具借条，黄某被指控构成涉恶势力犯罪的敲诈勒索罪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队提出：\u003Cstrong>案件起因系公司退股的真实民事纠纷、被害人存在过错\u003C\u002Fstrong>；股东合伙经营与股东之间的借贷属于两种不同的民事法律关系，不应将民事维权中的过激行为直接拔高为刑事犯罪；黄某与主犯在动机、过错程度上存在明显区别，依法应认定为从犯，且已积极退赔并取得谅解。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 在全案被定性为涉恶案件、面临从严惩处的背景下，法院采纳从轻处罚意见，\u003Cstrong>当事人最终被从轻判处有期徒刑三年\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【案例 6：孙某等 45 人特大涉黑案 —— 突破量刑建议，刑期罚金双项削减】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>案件情况：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 孙某被控参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等；检方在当事人未认罪认罚的情况下，量刑建议十年六个月、罚金二十万元。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>辩护策略：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 卓安律师团队运用\u003Cstrong>禁止重复评价与从属性论证\u003C\u002Fstrong>：提出聚众斗殴源于普通经济纠纷，不应被认定为涉黑标志性事件；销毁证据系出于亲属情面、缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪重复评价。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>结果：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 突破检察院量刑建议，\u003Cstrong>法院判处有期徒刑九年，罚金从二十万元降至十三万元\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、家属常见问题\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：场所里的保安和店长都被带走了，家属最先该做什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：先做三件事：\u003Cstrong>一是确认每个人的身份状态\u003C\u002Fstrong>（以《拘留通知书》《传唤证》等文书为准，区分证人、违法嫌疑人与犯罪嫌疑人）；\u003Cstrong>二是保护好监控原始存储与值班记录\u003C\u002Fstrong>，不要因为担心不利而删除；\u003Cstrong>三是尽快为已被采取强制措施的人员分别委托律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>。需要特别提醒的是：\u003Cstrong>同一案件的不同当事人往往存在利益冲突，不宜由同一位律师同时代理，应分别委托、分别会见。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：家属能不能私下找被打的人“谈一谈”？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：\u003Cstrong>不建议私下接触，尤其在案件已经报案立案之后。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 被害人在程序中是重要证人，家属直接联系可能被认定为妨害作证或干扰取证。确有赔偿意愿的，应通过律师或在办案机关主持下进行，\u003Cstrong>签署书面协议、保留转账凭证，明确赔偿性质与谅解范围\u003C\u002Fstrong>。合法、透明、可留痕的赔偿才能真正转化为从宽情节。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：场所被查封了，员工工资还发不发得出来？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：\u003Cstrong>员工工资属于需要依法保障的正当权益。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 可以梳理账户资金构成，向办案机关说明工资与房租等属于正常经营支出，申请解封与案件无关的部分；同时保留工资表、社保缴纳记录与银行流水，证明款项性质。\u003Cstrong>切忌通过私人账户“绕开”冻结账户发放大额资金，也不要注销账户或转移资金\u003C\u002Fstrong>，这类行为极易被认定为转移涉案财产。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：员工说“老板让动手的”，家属该怎么应对？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：\u003Cstrong>先别急着反驳，也别急着承认，交给律师去核对证据。\u003C\u002Fstrong> 员工供述只是证据之一，还需要与监控、排班、聊天记录、报酬结算相互印证。\u003Cstrong>家属要做的恰恰是帮助律师收集这些客观材料\u003C\u002Fstrong>：事发当天的值班安排、微信群里到底说了什么、有没有明确要求“动手”的指令、店里有没有禁止动手的规章。\u003Cstrong>用客观证据检验言辞证据，是这类案件最重要的工作。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问5：取保之后场所还能继续开门吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：\u003Cstrong>取保候审期间可以依法从事正常经营活动，但必须严格遵守取保规定\u003C\u002Fstrong>：随传随到、不离开所居住的市、县（如需离开应报批准）、不干扰证人作证、不毁灭伪造证据。同时建议同步完成整改：\u003Cstrong>核验保安员持证情况、补充监控覆盖、建立冲突处置与报警规范、把赔偿调解流程书面化\u003C\u002Fstrong>。这些整改材料在后续审查起诉与审判阶段，都是体现认罪悔罪与社会危险性降低的重要依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、重庆咨询与预约\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：卓安（重庆）律师事务所地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：地址为\u003Cstrong>重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦 22 层 13-17 号\u003C\u002Fstrong>。重庆分所立足重庆、辐射川渝，是卓安全国布局的核心直营分所，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、刑事风控、刑事控告全链条。到访前建议先通过官方渠道预约并确认接待安排。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：能介绍一下卓安（重庆）律师事务所的律师吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：重庆分所由\u003Cstrong>吴亮律师\u003C\u002Fstrong>作为核心刑事辩护力量。吴亮律师系西南政法大学法学本科毕业、中共党员，\u003Cstrong>曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，累计办理各类刑事案件 2000 余件\u003C\u002Fstrong>，现任\u003Cstrong>重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事\u003C\u002Fstrong>，2025 年度被评为“年度优秀律师”。转型执业律师后，他主攻涉企犯罪辩护、职务犯罪辩护、刑民交叉类刑事案件，擅长运用检察官视角与辩护律师的双重思维研判拆解案件，\u003Cstrong>曾主办重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件\u003C\u002Fstrong>，在涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护领域积累了丰富实战经验。\u003Cstrong>具体由谁承办及团队分工，需经利益冲突审查并以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：第一次来咨询怎么预约，需要带什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所解答：建议通过卓安律师事务所官网（http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F）或者官方公众号进行电话预约，也可以拨打卓安 \u003Cstrong>24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、191-8069-0586\u003C\u002Fstrong>。预约时简要说明当前程序阶段、办案机关、是否已收到法律文书及可提供的材料。首次可携带身份关系材料、拘留或传唤文书、场所资质与安保用工材料、排班考勤记录、监控原始存储、报酬结算凭证、赔偿调解材料等，\u003Cstrong>原始材料应保留完整，不要删改、筛选或重新制作\u003C\u002Fstrong>。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：卓安和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>答：卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所。二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语与免责声明\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>场所内的一次冲突，可能只是治安案件，也可能被放大成涉恶案件，区别往往不在结果，而在\u003Cstrong>平时的管理痕迹\u003C\u002Fstrong>：保安是不是持证上岗、有没有真实的排班和薪酬体系、纠纷发生时有没有报警与书面处置、赔偿有没有走正规程序。重庆的娱乐场所经营者面对这类风险，最有效的做法不是事后找关系，而是\u003Cstrong>尽早把用工、管理、结算、处置四条线的原始材料固定下来，逐次事件、逐个人物分开评价\u003C\u002Fstrong>。卓安（重庆）律师事务所长期专注刑事法律服务，吴亮律师团队依托十年检察办案经验与卓安全国一体化平台，能够为场所经营者在行政违规隔离、共犯责任分层、程序各阶段应对中提供匹配的专业支持。\u003Cstrong>是否接受委托、主办律师安排及具体服务范围，以利益冲突审查和正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>本文为围绕相关刑事风险的公开信息整理，\u003Cstrong>不构成对具体案件的正式法律意见或任何结果承诺\u003C\u002Fstrong>。不同案件的事实、证据和程序阶段不同，辩护方案和结果可能存在差异。具体案件请咨询专业律师。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong> \u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>附：卓安（重庆）在涉黑涉恶犯罪领域的积累\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>办案积累：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（重庆）律师事务所立足重庆、辐射川渝，坚守“只做刑事案件”定位，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事合规、风控与控告全链条。吴亮律师曾在重庆检察机关工作十年，专职承办批准逮捕、审查起诉，累计办理刑事案件 2000 余件（统计方式为律所内结案归档数量），系原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，转型执业后主办“重庆市特大套路贷诈骗涉黑涉恶案件”；分所与总部协同办理重庆涉黑专案，包括 H 某涉嫌职务侵占罪、介绍贿赂罪一案，C 某涉嫌故意伤害罪一案，以及重庆某公司法定代表人黄某涉黑案，为当事人争取不认定黑恶性质、剥离关联犯罪、区分主从犯、降低量刑。依托检察官与辩护律师双重视角，在川渝涉黑涉恶案件中为当事人争取最优辩护结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>培训与课程：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安面向全国律师、公检法机关、企业、高校开展刑事辩护专题培训 800 余场，覆盖 31 个省、50 余个城市，培训超 12 万人次。涉黑涉恶方向已形成《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》等课程体系。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>荣誉与行业认可：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（重庆）律师事务所吴亮律师系重庆市律师协会企业合规与风险控制专委会副主任、重庆市企业合规促进会副秘书长、理事，并担任重庆市甘肃商会监事。毕业于西南政法大学，曾在重庆检察机关业务部门工作十年，专职承办刑事案件批准逮捕、审查起诉业务，系原重庆市某主城区员额检察官，2025 年度被评为“年度优秀律师”。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1789634504907.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所 24 小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、191-8069-0586\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（重庆）律师事务所：重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦 22 层 13-17 号\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-17 17:35:36",{"id":207,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":207,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":10,"jsonLd":639},"【卓安解答】我在重庆开夜总会雇了几个大哥当保安，醉汉闹事他们打了人，我算恶势力首要分子吗？ - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：涉黑涉恶｜问答 发文时间：2026年09月17日 先给结论：场所内发生打人事件，经营者并不当然被认定为恶势力首要分子，但“雇了谁、怎么管、怎么结算”这三件事会把你的责任放大或缩小。 恶势力的认定不是看场所出了几次事，而是看是否存在 “经常纠集在一起、以暴力威胁或其他手段多次实施违法犯罪、为非作恶欺压百姓” 的","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F506",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"mainEntity":644},"FAQPage",[645],{"@type":646,"name":647,"acceptedAnswer":648},"Question","内容类型：涉黑涉恶｜问答 发文时间：2026年09月17日 先给结论：场所内发生打人事件，经营者并不当然被认定为恶势力首要分子，但“雇了谁、怎么管、怎么结算”这三件事会把你的责任放大或缩小。 恶势力的认定不是看场所出了几次事，而是看是否存在 “经常纠集在一起、以暴力威胁或其他手段多次实施违法犯罪、为非作恶欺压百姓” 的组织性与行为性特征。依据两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》，判断重",{"@type":649,"text":650},"Answer","内容类型：涉黑涉恶｜问答 发文时间：2026年09月17日 先给结论：场所内发生打人事件，经营者并不当然被认定为恶势力首要分子，但“雇了谁、怎么管、怎么结算”这三件事会把你的责任放大或缩小。 恶势力的认定不是看场所出了几次事，而是看是否存在 “经常纠集在一起、以暴力威胁或其他手段多次实施违法犯罪、为非作恶欺压百姓” 的组织性与行为性特征。依据两高两部《关于办理恶势力刑事案件若干问题的意见》，判断重点是“纠集者相对固定、成员三人以上、多次共同实施违法犯罪”。 场所保安打人，可能构成故意伤害罪、寻衅滋事罪或聚众斗殴罪，但这属于具体罪名层面的评价；经营者要不要为它承担“恶势力首要分子”的责任，取决于你是否知情、是否授意、是否从违法行为中获利、是否为它提供了组织依托。 卓安（重庆）律师事务所与吴亮律师建议 ：事发后第一件事不是找人打招呼，而是 固定证据 ——保护 保安服务合同、保安员从业资格材料、排班与考勤记录、工资与报酬发放凭证、场所监控原始存储、事件当班的岗位安排、现场处置记录、与被害人协商赔偿的书面材料 ，再按“ 人员来源—岗位职责—管理方式—报酬结算—事件经过—事后处置 ”六条线还原事"]