[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"public-home":3,"news-detail-faq-351":623},{"entity":4,"seo":575},{"siteConfig":5,"banners":28,"branches":48,"honors":81,"cases":113,"caseTypes":177,"caseIntro":224,"latestLawyerNews":225,"lawyerNews":239,"lawyerNewsMonthCount":310,"serviceTags":311,"serviceCategories":535,"subSlogan":12,"serviceIntro":552,"homeStats":553,"serviceProducts":565},{"id":6,"siteName":7,"siteDomain":8,"logoUrl":9,"faviconUrl":10,"slogan":11,"subSlogan":12,"aboutSummary":13,"aboutImage":14,"teamPhotoUrl":15,"hotline":16,"email":10,"headquartersAddress":17,"headquartersLng":18,"headquartersLat":19,"foundingYear":20,"creditCode":10,"sameAs":10,"wechatQrcode":21,"videoQrcode":22,"douyinQrcode":23,"xiaohongshuQrcode":24,"icpNumber":25,"psbNumber":26,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27},1,"四川卓安律师事务所","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",null,"为生命辩护，为自由辩护","一家专注刑事，走「专门」路线的律师所","卓安律师事务所长期专注刑事领域，以专业化、精品化、一体化运营为全国客户提供刑事辩护、刑事控告、企业刑事合规与风险防控法律服务。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fffef6a8d-e19d-44df-a8f1-08ece0042bd7.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F87a0be21-3874-4f87-8586-63a62fd10a31.jpg","4000-148-149","四川省成都高新区天府二街蜀都中心1号楼19楼1902-1904室",104.06749,30.5524575,"2003","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fb86da287-bc41-4285-aa3c-0602065190d2.jpg","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F77233542-14b7-4884-a78f-8c0d531d096d.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F616aa748-5454-49dd-a09d-a73925d672fe.png","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002F4b5bc9ea-d513-4287-8aca-0a589e539381.png","蜀ICP备2026035071号-1","川公网安备51019002009895号","2026-06-22 21:30:32",[29,34,39,42,45],{"id":6,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":33,"linkUrl":32,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:33:46",0,"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Ff8e758a5-0784-4769-aa52-97ec64cc1216.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":36,"updatedAt":36,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":37,"linkUrl":32,"sort":38,"status":6},3,"2026-07-14 14:39:20","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F557b3e37-70b1-4aa8-88d6-9a07b61969b1.png",2,{"id":40,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":41,"linkUrl":32,"sort":35,"status":6},5,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F7512d49c-e31a-4bd1-a436-00de2d2d960f.png",{"id":43,"createdAt":30,"updatedAt":30,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":44,"linkUrl":32,"sort":43,"status":6},4,"\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F27e2b0bf-cf18-4dd0-bb77-5853e0673a1b.png",{"id":38,"createdAt":46,"updatedAt":46,"deleted":31,"title":32,"subtitle":32,"imageUrl":47,"linkUrl":32,"sort":40,"status":6},"2026-07-14 14:39:06","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F3c8f1908-114d-44bf-9e33-2818d8bfce89.png",[49,55,60,65,70,75],{"id":35,"createdAt":50,"updatedAt":51,"deleted":31,"code":52,"name":53,"address":17,"phone":16,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":54,"status":6},"2026-06-16 13:55:38","2026-08-24 21:29:48","chengdu","成都总所",-1,{"id":6,"createdAt":56,"updatedAt":56,"deleted":31,"code":57,"name":58,"address":59,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:09","kunming","昆明","云南省昆明市五华区和谐广场和谐B座第49层4909室",{"id":38,"createdAt":61,"updatedAt":61,"deleted":31,"code":62,"name":63,"address":64,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-22 21:46:31","shenzheng","深圳","广东省深圳市龙华区民塘路328号龙华区数字创新中心A座14层04、05号",{"id":43,"createdAt":66,"updatedAt":66,"deleted":31,"code":67,"name":68,"address":69,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:55:59","chongqing","重庆","重庆市渝北区湖山路虹陶大厦22层13-17号",{"id":40,"createdAt":71,"updatedAt":71,"deleted":31,"code":72,"name":73,"address":74,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-26 13:56:12","dazhou","达州","四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼",{"id":76,"createdAt":77,"updatedAt":77,"deleted":31,"code":78,"name":79,"address":80,"phone":32,"thumbnail":32,"lng":10,"lat":10,"sort":31,"status":6},6,"2026-06-26 13:56:31","xining","西宁","青海省西宁市城东区南山东路创新创业大厦A座15楼",[82,88,94,100,105,109],{"id":6,"createdAt":83,"updatedAt":83,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":84,"thumbnail":85,"content":10,"publishTime":86,"sort":87,"status":6},"2026-06-26 14:01:11","四川卓安律师事务所党支部—“四川省律师行业党建标准化律师事务所党组织”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F15b73500-33d0-4eae-ae82-192e3f44d1c3.jpg","2026-07-27 21:53:52",-3,{"id":38,"createdAt":89,"updatedAt":89,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":90,"thumbnail":91,"content":10,"publishTime":92,"sort":93,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:22:47","四川卓安律师事务所——\"四川省律师行业文化名所\"","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002F3e628c5a-4df8-42d2-8667-d107a295f786.jpg","2026-08-26 17:05:47",-2,{"id":95,"createdAt":96,"updatedAt":96,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":97,"thumbnail":98,"content":10,"publishTime":99,"sort":54,"status":6},24,"2026-09-01 14:02:47","“司法云庭荟”法律职业共同体线上交流平台建设的全新创新做法入选最高人民检察院政治部《全国检察机关教育培训创新100例》","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F01\u002F03c5415b-2799-4097-8c6b-95a6089d5a3c.jpg","2026-09-01 14:01:51",{"id":35,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":102,"thumbnail":103,"content":10,"publishTime":104,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-06-28 22:23:01","成安律师被评为“成都市优秀律师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F26\u002Fdae82b8c-327b-437e-8c37-bc241a6bf780.jpg","2026-08-26 17:07:20",{"id":43,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":106,"thumbnail":107,"content":10,"publishTime":108,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“成都市人民政府第一届行政复议委员会委员”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002F92313a8b-8b6e-4cff-9c80-ec82331e9bc0.jpg","2026-08-27 14:01:26",{"id":40,"createdAt":101,"updatedAt":101,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"title":110,"thumbnail":111,"content":10,"publishTime":112,"sort":31,"status":6},"成安律师被聘请为“日知公益学习社团青年刑辩人才计划特聘导师”","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F27\u002Fb8c6c1f9-16e5-4f16-b3c3-a8833b9d4275.jpg","2026-08-27 14:03:31",[114,120,124,128,132,137,141,145,149,153,157,161,166,169,173],{"id":115,"title":116,"thumbnail":10,"summary":117,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},276,"X某涉嫌开设赌场犯罪，团队律师为其辩护获轻判 ","一、案情简介 2018年3月底至2019年一月以来，熊某、马某、刘某在成都市成华区开设赌场，熊某负责经营管理，三人招揽赌客，提供场地和扑克牌以\"扯旋\"的方式赌博，并按照每场赌局800元抽头盈利。 2019年1月22日21时50分许，民警在该","经济犯罪优秀案例","economic_crime",{"id":121,"title":122,"thumbnail":10,"summary":123,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},275,"G某非国家工作人员受贿一案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 被告人高某因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪，于2014年11月21日因本案被指定居所监视居住，同年11月24日被刑事拘留，同年12月31日被逮捕，2017年1月21日被取保候审。 武侯区人民法院于2016年12月14日做出刑事判决，",{"id":125,"title":126,"thumbnail":10,"summary":127,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},274,"Z某涉嫌合同诈骗罪潜逃多年后被引渡归案，团队律师为其辩护获轻判","一、案情简介 Z某曾经担任广东某集团公司的法定代表人、总经理。1997年7月，广东某集团公司与成都某集团公司商讨“股权转让”事宜，并成为成都某集团公司上市公司的大股东。期间，据公安机关侦查，广东某集团公司对本公司进行了“包装”，“伪造”了本",{"id":129,"title":130,"thumbnail":10,"summary":131,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},273,"H某被诉合同诈骗与敲诈勒索，团队律师成功辩护，两罪变一罪","一、案情简介 被控合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪两罪 2009年9月22日，H某因涉嫌诈骗罪被成都市公安局锦江区分局刑事拘留，同年10月21日被执行逮捕。 成都市锦江区人民检察院于2010年9月15日以合同诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪起诉到成都锦江区人民法院",{"id":133,"title":134,"thumbnail":135,"summary":136,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},272,"K某涉嫌抢劫罪、盗窃罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，重罪变轻罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F9efa533b-59c3-4def-b3ef-cd4faa85d1df.png","【编者按：究竟是什么原因让他走上犯罪之路？对于其他人来说一样平静的日子，但是他却因为不平常的行为而走上了犯罪之路。就在间隔一个月的时间里，他即盗窃又抢劫，给社会、给家人、同时也给自己带来了危害。盗窃罪与抢劫罪是司法实践中常见罪名，成安博士打",{"id":138,"title":139,"thumbnail":10,"summary":140,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},271,"被告人H某初犯涉嫌诈骗，团队律师为其提供专业辩护","一、案情简介 检方指控诈骗罪，数额较大难逃责 2011年3月12日，H某因涉嫌诈骗犯罪被成都市公安局锦江区公安分局刑事拘留。 2011年4月17日，经成都市锦江区人民检察院批准，同日由成都市公安局锦江区分局执行逮捕2011年6月3日，由该检",{"id":142,"title":143,"thumbnail":10,"summary":144,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},270,"J某合同诈骗案，团队律师为其辩护，终判处无期徒刑","一、案情简介 2012年7月9日至2015年1月27日期间，J某在签订、履行合同过程中，隐瞒XX项目不具备发包条件以及已与其他单位签订施工合同事实，重复与十二家建设单位或个人签订施工合同，收取了被害单位或个人履约保证金，主要用于偿还个人债务",{"id":146,"title":147,"thumbnail":10,"summary":148,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},269,"M某涉嫌盗窃，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 2013年8月初，被告人马某、王某共谋通过手机网上银行盗窃他人银行存款。于2013年8月2日至3日通过手机网上银行将段某、胡某的建设银行账户存款共计人民币269500元转入黄某（另处）所提供的银行卡中，并通过网上银行将段某建设",{"id":150,"title":151,"thumbnail":10,"summary":152,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},268,"X某涉嫌受贿罪、行贿罪累计近十七万元，团队律师为其辩护，一审终获十年四个月有期徒刑","一、案情简介 胥某利用职务之便，多次对彭某开设的赌场提供保护伞，并收取彭某财物累计十余万元 被告人胥某，男，2014年2月27日因涉嫌受贿罪被某区检察院决定刑事拘留，同日由成都市公安局某区分局执行，同年3月13日因涉嫌受贿罪由成都市市人民检",{"id":154,"title":155,"thumbnail":10,"summary":156,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},267,"Z某涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪，团队律师为其辩护","一、案情简介 Z某在四川省成都市成立公司非法吸收公众存款获利，自动到成都市公安局高新区分局公安机关投案 被告人Z某，男，2015年9月17日因涉嫌非法吸收公众存款罪被成都市公安局高新区分局刑事拘留，同年10月23 日被逮捕。 2013年7月",{"id":158,"title":159,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},266,"P某涉嫌走私国家禁止进出口货物罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，成功获得缓刑","一、案情简介 在2017年—2019年期间，P某任某农资公司的部门副总经理。公司在没有获得国家行政部门相应许可的情况下，通过伪报贸易国别和目的港的方式，先后分多次将5000余吨的禁止进出口货物出口。 二、案件焦点 1.在任期间职务变动导致P",{"id":162,"title":163,"thumbnail":164,"summary":165,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},265,"W某涉嫌生产伪劣产品罪一案，团队律师为其辩护，获缓刑","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F18\u002F4bc70f76-2197-428f-bdab-e8f061b4d776.png","一、案情简介 四川XX有限责任公司违反国家药品管理规定，在产品中掺杂、掺假，以不合格产品冒充合格产品，销售金额400余万，被指控构成生产、销售伪劣产品罪，系单位犯罪。 W某被指控为涉案公司的二把手，企业负责人，是涉案药品生产的主要责任人员，",{"id":167,"title":168,"thumbnail":10,"summary":160,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},264,"P某涉嫌走私国家禁止进出口货物罪一案，团队律师为 其辩护，成功获得缓刑",{"id":170,"title":171,"thumbnail":10,"summary":172,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},263,"为公司节省税费，老总L某修改参数进口设备偷逃税收220余万元，涉嫌走私普通货物被起诉。团队律师一审辩护成功减轻处罚适用缓刑","一、案情简介 2008年5月，被告人L某所在单位要进口一台旋压机设备，该设备按照当时政策进口将缴纳200多万元税收。单位是内地的上市国有单位的子公司，此前也未进口过设备，后找到一报关代理公司代为申报进口事宜，代理公司工作员告知该设备只要将参",{"id":174,"title":175,"thumbnail":10,"summary":176,"caseTypeId":43,"caseTypeName":118,"caseTypeCode":119},262,"涉嫌信用卡诈骗，团队律师成功为B某辩护，最终仅获刑六个月且缓刑八个月","一、案情简述 柏某等人涉嫌冒用他人信用卡，被检察院以信用卡诈骗罪提起公诉，一审法院判决被告人柏某构成信用卡诈骗罪，判处拘役六个月，缓刑八个月，判处罚金人民币二万元。 2013年9月，被告人柏某与同案犯到成都市高新区某银行ATM机处取钱，二人",[178,183,188,193,196,201,206,212,218],{"id":6,"code":179,"name":180,"summary":181,"keywords":182},"major_case","大案要案优秀案例","办理重大疑难复杂及社会关注案件，涉及故意杀人、毒品、涉黑涉恶、职务犯罪等。","重大疑难｜死刑复核｜二审再审",{"id":38,"code":184,"name":185,"summary":186,"keywords":187},"duty_crime","职务犯罪优秀案例","覆盖贪污罪、受贿罪、行贿罪、挪用公款罪、滥用职权罪、玩忽职守罪等。","监察留置｜公职人员辩护｜数额认定",{"id":35,"code":189,"name":190,"summary":191,"keywords":192},"gang_crime","涉黑涉恶优秀案例","覆盖组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪，以及寻衅滋事、敲诈勒索、聚众斗殴等。","黑恶性质认定｜组织层级｜罪数认定",{"id":43,"code":119,"name":118,"summary":194,"keywords":195},"覆盖诈骗罪、合同诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款罪、非法经营罪、虚开增值税专用发票罪等。","企业家辩护｜涉案金额｜刑民交叉",{"id":40,"code":197,"name":198,"summary":199,"keywords":200},"drug_crime","毒品犯罪优秀案例","覆盖走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪，非法持有毒品罪及制毒物品犯罪。","毒品数量认定｜主观明知｜死刑辩护",{"id":76,"code":202,"name":203,"summary":204,"keywords":205},"property_crime","财产犯罪优秀案例","覆盖盗窃罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪等。","非法占有目的｜涉案金额｜退赔谅解",{"id":207,"code":208,"name":209,"summary":210,"keywords":211},7,"cyber_crime","网络新型犯罪优秀案例","覆盖帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪、电信网络诈骗、侵犯公民个人信息罪、开设赌场罪等。\n","电子数据审查｜主观明知｜资金流水",{"id":213,"code":214,"name":215,"summary":216,"keywords":217},8,"corporate_compliance","性犯罪优秀案例","覆盖强奸罪、强制猥亵罪、猥亵儿童罪、组织卖淫罪、传播淫秽物品罪等。\n","言词证据｜未成年人案件｜隐私保护",{"id":219,"code":220,"name":221,"summary":222,"keywords":223},9,"criminal_complaint","人身权利犯罪优秀案例","覆盖故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪、非法拘禁罪、绑架罪、过失致人死亡罪等。","正当防卫｜因果关系｜伤情鉴定","多年来，卓安专注刑事领域，累计办理刑事案件8000余件，依法为当事人争取无罪、取保候审、缓刑、不起诉、从轻及减轻处罚等结果。",{"id":226,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":10,"status":10,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":234,"lawyer":238},639,"2026-09-16 15:58:38","深圳市人民检察院","走私普通货物、物品罪","2026.9.16 范炜炜 走私普通货物、物品罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002Fc87834cd-b3af-4570-a4a4-3c0cbd91bd79.png","2026-09-16 16:36:45","范炜炜",[235],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"专职律师","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fcbb5550d-a38a-40ed-80f8-4d2bcdff7183.png",{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},[240,243,257,273,292],{"id":226,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":219,"city":228,"caseType":229,"title":230,"thumbnail":231,"content":10,"publishTime":232,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":233,"lawyers":241},[242],{"id":219,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":233,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":237,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},{"id":244,"createdAt":245,"updatedAt":245,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":246,"city":247,"caseType":248,"title":249,"thumbnail":250,"content":10,"publishTime":251,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":252,"lawyers":253},635,"2026-09-16 15:08:50",43,"宣汉县人民检察院","电信网络诈骗罪","2026年9月16日 晏建强 电信网络诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F28353040-2818-4111-bad1-72aaef3376f2.png","2026-09-16 15:07:57","晏建强",[254],{"id":246,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":252,"position":255,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":256,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"刑事四部 部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002Fab5ccf97-3ef1-4db5-a101-a5f001ec2350.jpg",{"id":258,"createdAt":227,"updatedAt":227,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":213,"city":259,"caseType":260,"title":261,"thumbnail":262,"content":10,"publishTime":263,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":264,"lawyers":265},638,"香蜜湖派出所、福田分局","敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","2026.9.8 杨小燕、毛文慧 敲诈勒索、诈骗罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F89cd6a84-c201-4a2d-a04a-5e5a87801f38.png","2026-09-08 15:57:43","杨小燕、毛文慧",[266,269],{"id":213,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":267,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":268,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"杨小燕","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F06\u002Fd28be361-02ed-4583-9233-cec5464e0c3b.png",{"id":270,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":271,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":272,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},102,"毛文慧","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F86f9e7ef-2467-4ec0-8658-57eeda0b5f5d.jpg",{"id":274,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":276,"city":277,"caseType":278,"title":279,"thumbnail":280,"content":10,"publishTime":281,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":282,"lawyers":283},634,"2026-09-16 14:59:30",79,"江津区人民法院","猥亵儿童罪","2026年9月 8 日 张津川、鲁俊林 猥亵儿童罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F13c222f9-ee44-425d-9bc4-29c188a9359f.png","2026-09-08 15:02:22","鲁俊林、张津川",[284,287],{"id":276,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":285,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":286,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"鲁俊林","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F69188fbb-b242-43a6-9ca2-29cec52da1cc.jpg",{"id":288,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":289,"position":290,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":291,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},82,"张津川","卓安（重庆）律师事务所  合伙人","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F3b4ec06f-eb61-4b5c-a5e1-759d77d45b9e.jpg",{"id":293,"createdAt":275,"updatedAt":275,"deleted":31,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"lawyerId":294,"city":295,"caseType":296,"title":297,"thumbnail":298,"content":10,"publishTime":299,"sort":31,"status":6,"lawyerNames":300,"lawyers":301},633,56,"南充市中级人民法院、西充县看守所","强奸罪","2026年9月 8 日 王子叶、李颜曦 强奸罪","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F16\u002F477ecfb2-8b92-48c2-bfbb-f8761f562b93.png","2026-09-08 15:01:19","李颜曦、王子叶",[302,307],{"id":303,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":304,"position":305,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":306,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},19,"李颜曦","业务一部 副部长","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F1669b7d1-05a5-44ec-b069-9c455cc5c0d6.png",{"id":294,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":10,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10,"schemaExtra":10,"name":308,"position":236,"branchId":10,"categoryId":10,"avatar":309,"content":10,"sort":10,"status":10},"王子叶","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F18\u002F154f6186-a0bd-4621-873e-adcf376b41f6.jpg",50,[312,321,327,334,341,348,355,361,367,376,383,390,397,404,411,420,427,434,441,447,453,458,464,470,476,482,488,497,504,511,517,523,529],{"id":313,"createdAt":314,"updatedAt":315,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":316,"name":317,"summary":318,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},17,"2026-08-25 13:58:49","2026-09-17 17:35:47","1","突发事件与侦查阶段","侦查阶段｜紧急介入与阶段辩护","criminal","核心刑事法律服务",{"id":303,"createdAt":322,"updatedAt":323,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":324,"name":325,"summary":326,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 13:59:08","2026-09-17 17:36:30","5","监察调查与留置相关服务","监察程序｜留置陪跑与纪法衔接",{"id":328,"createdAt":329,"updatedAt":330,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":331,"name":332,"summary":333,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},20,"2026-08-25 13:59:22","2026-09-17 17:39:44","6","审查起诉阶段","审查起诉｜阅卷审证与起诉前辩护",{"id":335,"createdAt":336,"updatedAt":337,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":338,"name":339,"summary":340,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},21,"2026-08-25 13:59:40","2026-09-17 17:39:36","7","一审审判阶段","一审审判｜庭前准备与法庭辩护",{"id":342,"createdAt":343,"updatedAt":344,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":345,"name":346,"summary":347,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},22,"2026-08-25 13:59:56","2026-09-17 17:39:29","8","二审与再审申诉","判后救济｜二审辩护与申诉审查",{"id":349,"createdAt":350,"updatedAt":351,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":352,"name":353,"summary":354,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},23,"2026-08-25 14:00:08","2026-09-17 17:40:33","9","死刑复核与重大案件辩护","重大疑难案件｜死刑复核专项辩护",{"id":95,"createdAt":356,"updatedAt":357,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":358,"name":359,"summary":360,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},"2026-08-25 14:00:19","2026-09-17 17:43:22","10","刑事控告与企业维权","被害人代理｜刑事控告与追赃挽损",{"id":362,"createdAt":363,"updatedAt":363,"deleted":31,"categoryId":6,"code":364,"name":365,"summary":366,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":319,"categoryName":320},40,"2026-09-17 17:41:48","95b7a27807a144f0a8f6c6b299949d83","刑罚执行与服刑衔接","判后服务｜入监准备与服刑衔接",{"id":368,"createdAt":369,"updatedAt":370,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":371,"name":372,"summary":373,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},25,"2026-08-25 14:00:31","2026-09-17 17:43:16","11","评估性会见","侦查阶段｜可独立委托的专项评估","key_crime","特色增值服务",{"id":377,"createdAt":378,"updatedAt":379,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":380,"name":381,"summary":382,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},26,"2026-08-25 14:00:48","2026-09-17 17:44:01","12","评估性阅卷","审查起诉／审判阶段｜证据专项评估",{"id":384,"createdAt":385,"updatedAt":386,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":387,"name":388,"summary":389,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},27,"2026-08-25 14:00:58","2026-09-17 17:44:41","13","深度刑事法律咨询","重大决定之前｜材料驱动的专项咨询",{"id":391,"createdAt":392,"updatedAt":393,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":394,"name":395,"summary":396,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},28,"2026-08-25 14:01:07","2026-09-17 17:45:54","14","客户与家属支持","刑事程序进行中｜信息、沟通与生活秩序支持",{"id":398,"createdAt":399,"updatedAt":400,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":401,"name":402,"summary":403,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},29,"2026-08-25 14:01:17","2026-09-17 17:45:49","15","涉案财产、隐私与家庭秩序","案件影响扩散时｜财产材料、隐私沟通与家庭衔接",{"id":405,"createdAt":406,"updatedAt":407,"deleted":31,"categoryId":38,"code":408,"name":409,"summary":410,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":374,"categoryName":375},30,"2026-08-25 14:01:27","2026-09-17 17:46:31","16","结案后的延伸支持","裁判或阶段终结后｜程序、服刑与生活重新衔接",{"id":412,"createdAt":413,"updatedAt":414,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":415,"name":416,"summary":417,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},31,"2026-08-25 14:01:38","2026-09-17 17:52:12","17","企业刑事风险体检与风控体系建设","通用专项｜事前预防与治理建设","corporate","企业刑事合规专项服务",{"id":421,"createdAt":422,"updatedAt":423,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":424,"name":425,"summary":426,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},33,"2026-08-25 14:01:53","2026-09-17 17:52:55","18","涉案企业整改与程序辅导","通用专项｜已涉案后的独立例外",{"id":428,"createdAt":429,"updatedAt":430,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":431,"name":432,"summary":433,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},34,"2026-08-25 14:02:01","2026-09-17 17:53:33","19","企业家与高管刑事风险防控","通用专项｜决策层履职边界",{"id":435,"createdAt":436,"updatedAt":437,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":438,"name":439,"summary":440,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},35,"2026-08-25 14:02:16","2026-09-17 17:54:11","20","内部调查与反舞弊","通用专项｜线索核查与组织治理",{"id":442,"createdAt":443,"updatedAt":443,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":444,"name":445,"summary":446,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},41,"2026-09-17 17:54:59","417a99b00e794bad8ade5ad3b8038f21","刑事控告、立案监督与追赃挽损","通用专项｜企业被害维权",{"id":448,"createdAt":449,"updatedAt":449,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":450,"name":451,"summary":452,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},42,"2026-09-17 17:55:32","c5c68ca28dce4ef88297ab87deb35f89","跨区域集团刑事风控","通用专项｜总部标准与属地落地",{"id":246,"createdAt":454,"updatedAt":454,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":455,"name":456,"summary":457,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},"2026-09-17 17:56:11","4db94e07c15343bb8a8e934cb6a18aac","医药医疗刑事风控","重点行业专项｜医药反腐与医疗治理",{"id":459,"createdAt":460,"updatedAt":460,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":461,"name":462,"summary":463,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},44,"2026-09-17 17:56:50","7f2f74d57ebf4b8c93ccc78388b161c3","金融与投融资刑事风控","重点行业专项｜募集、放贷与资金管理",{"id":465,"createdAt":466,"updatedAt":466,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":467,"name":468,"summary":469,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},45,"2026-09-17 17:57:24","07113ab0e5654c39b6f477623551b995","建筑与工程刑事风控","重点行业专项｜招采、项目资金与履职安全",{"id":471,"createdAt":472,"updatedAt":472,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":473,"name":474,"summary":475,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},46,"2026-09-17 18:05:01","716c09b90a8442c4a4627e6739e63f84","科技、数据与知识产权刑事风控","重点行业专项｜数据资产与创新保护",{"id":477,"createdAt":478,"updatedAt":478,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":479,"name":480,"summary":481,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},47,"2026-09-17 18:05:43","624003bc8c2c4e97b3045fa11438eef6","食品药品与生态环境刑事风控","重点行业专项｜质量安全与环境责任",{"id":483,"createdAt":484,"updatedAt":484,"deleted":31,"categoryId":35,"code":485,"name":486,"summary":487,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":418,"categoryName":419},48,"2026-09-17 18:06:22","4c7ca0cf48464e3da203f576891ef516","财税与票据刑事风控","重点行业专项｜业务真实性与资金票据闭环",{"id":489,"createdAt":490,"updatedAt":491,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":492,"name":493,"summary":494,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},13,"2026-08-25 13:54:59","2026-09-17 17:12:28","2","突发拘留与紧急会见","侦查初期｜拘留信息核实与律师紧急介入","XINGSHIHEGUI","刑事危机应对",{"id":498,"createdAt":499,"updatedAt":500,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":501,"name":502,"summary":503,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},14,"2026-08-25 13:55:16","2026-09-17 17:29:15","3","留置陪跑与家属支持","监察程序｜家属信息整理、决策支持与纪法衔接",{"id":505,"createdAt":506,"updatedAt":507,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":508,"name":509,"summary":510,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},16,"2026-08-25 13:55:34","2026-09-17 17:29:59","4","搜查、查封、扣押与冻结应对","人身与财产应急｜现场规范、清单核对与经营衔接",{"id":512,"createdAt":513,"updatedAt":513,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":514,"name":515,"summary":516,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},36,"2026-09-17 17:30:51","2d10ec3e740e47bb8ceb409e85e9d042","被举报、传唤与调查配合","风险前置研判｜身份定位、材料梳理与陈述准备",{"id":518,"createdAt":519,"updatedAt":519,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":520,"name":521,"summary":522,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},37,"2026-09-17 17:32:03","c203ad5319ae46b6af081e2cbc0aaebd","企业刑事危机与经营衔接","企业应急处置｜法律风险、内部授权与经营连续性",{"id":524,"createdAt":525,"updatedAt":525,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":526,"name":527,"summary":528,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},38,"2026-09-17 17:32:59","f98bfa77c1ba421c844e633bf3e9413a","自首、认罪认罚与退赃退赔决策辅导","重大程序决策｜事实、证据、时点与后果的条件化分析",{"id":530,"createdAt":531,"updatedAt":531,"deleted":31,"categoryId":40,"code":532,"name":533,"summary":534,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6,"categoryCode":495,"categoryName":496},39,"2026-09-17 17:33:40","61a75eb9f28646cf83e5edf175ebc104","跨区域紧急协同","异地案件｜属地响应、总部研判与多地任务统筹",[536,540,544,548],{"id":40,"createdAt":537,"updatedAt":538,"deleted":31,"code":495,"name":496,"summary":539,"displayTags":10,"icon":32,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":31,"status":6},"2026-08-17 10:39:04","2026-09-17 15:58:52","针对拘留、留置、搜查、冻结等突发涉刑风险，快速研判程序与应对路径。",{"id":6,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":541,"deleted":31,"code":319,"name":320,"summary":542,"displayTags":10,"icon":543,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":6,"status":6},"2026-09-16 09:31:21","以团队办案和 “控、辩、审、学” 多维研判，覆盖侦查至申诉控告全流程。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Fca98263c-68cd-4768-8c9e-ccc0086eade9.jpg",{"id":38,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":545,"deleted":31,"code":374,"name":375,"summary":546,"displayTags":10,"icon":547,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":38,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:04:37","提供评估性会见、阅卷评估、深度咨询与家属支持，让服务更清楚、更有温度。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F5df41c7a-813a-48db-8eb7-057f5019ab32.jpg",{"id":35,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":549,"deleted":31,"code":418,"name":419,"summary":550,"displayTags":10,"icon":551,"thumbnail":10,"content":10,"sort":35,"status":6},"2026-08-25 14:05:04","面向企业及高管，提供刑事风险体检、重点岗位排查、内部调查与制度整改。","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F40c30169-fc75-40bc-a144-8f9b4261f108.jpg","卓安以刑事专业能力为企业提供风险识别、合规治理、专项培训与危机处置支持，帮助企业在复杂经营环境中守住法律底线。",[554,557,560,563],{"value":555,"label":556},"8000+","成功案例",{"value":558,"label":559},"600+","锦旗感谢",{"value":561,"label":562},"100+","法律服务产品",{"value":331,"label":564},"全国分所",[566,569,572],{"title":567,"desc":568},"刑事诉讼类服务","律师会见、法律咨询、专家论证、案件指导\u002F协作、立案\u002F取保\u002F不起诉\u002F无罪\u002F罪轻等全阶段辩护。",{"title":570,"desc":571},"刑事风控类服务","风控计划、风控评估、执法调查应对、企业全生命周期刑事风控与重点行业\u002F领域风控。",{"title":573,"desc":574},"刑事普法类服务","政策宣讲、知识付费、轻法服务（线上咨询、文书范本、解决方案）等上百项精准化产品。",{"title":576,"description":13,"keywords":577,"canonical":578,"image":10,"jsonLd":579},"四川卓安律师事务所 - 专注刑事辩护的专业律所","刑事辩护,律师事务所,四川卓安","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F",[580],{"@context":581,"@graph":582},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org",[583,589],{"@type":584,"@id":585,"url":578,"name":7,"inLanguage":586,"publisher":587},"WebSite","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#website","zh-CN",{"@id":588},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#organization",{"@type":590,"@id":588,"name":7,"url":578,"logo":591,"image":591,"description":13,"telephone":16,"email":10,"foundingDate":20,"taxID":10,"inLanguage":586,"address":592,"geo":595,"department":597},"LegalService","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002F083753d8-b587-4105-a0e2-9da8eacdcfd5.png",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17,"addressCountry":594},"PostalAddress","CN",{"@type":596,"latitude":19,"longitude":18},"GeoCoordinates",[598,603,607,611,615,619],{"@type":599,"@id":600,"name":53,"image":10,"telephone":16,"address":601,"parentOrganization":602},"LocalBusiness","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chengdu",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":17},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":604,"name":58,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":605,"parentOrganization":606},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-kunming",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":59},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":608,"name":63,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":609,"parentOrganization":610},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-shenzheng",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":64},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":612,"name":68,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":613,"parentOrganization":614},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-chongqing",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":69},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":616,"name":73,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":617,"parentOrganization":618},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-dazhou",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":74},{"@id":588},{"@type":599,"@id":620,"name":79,"image":10,"telephone":32,"address":621,"parentOrganization":622},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F#branch-xining",{"@type":593,"streetAddress":80},{"@id":588},{"entity":624,"seo":635},{"id":625,"createdAt":10,"updatedAt":626,"deleted":10,"seoTitle":32,"seoDescription":32,"seoKeywords":32,"schemaExtra":10,"typeId":207,"title":627,"thumbnail":628,"content":629,"publishTime":630,"sort":10,"status":10,"newsType":631},351,"2026-09-09 17:17:14","【卓安解答】我是达州企业负责人，项目饭局被查涉黑涉恶“利益输送”怎么办？","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F09\u002F5e3cf138-c0fd-4c14-8bbe-00d1a40a4129.jpg","\u003Cp style=\"text-align: center;\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1788944243929.png\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\">\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶｜公职交往、饭局往来与保护伞线索问答\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>发布时间：2026年09月09日\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>先给结论\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>在达州工程劳务、商贸供货、项目协调或日常接待中，和公职人员有工作接触、共同出席饭局、被他人提及“关系”或被举报存在“保护伞”线索，都不等于已经构成涉黑涉恶关联或包庇、纵容。涉黑涉恶及所谓“保护伞”评价，仍须回到具体权限、请托事项、实际处置、利益基础、电子数据和程序材料，逐项核实，不能由一次饭局、熟人关系、片段聊天或传闻替代证明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所主任张罗律师建议先按“身份权限—接触事项—项目流程—资金与接待—电子数据—程序节点—财产边界”建立原始材料目录；在依法委托和利益冲突审查后，团队可围绕文书、证据形成过程、个人行为与关系边界开展审查和法律服务。本文面向被要求说明项目交往、饭局接待、审批沟通或被提及涉黑涉恶保护伞线索的企业负责人、项目人员、公职人员及其家属，仅作一般风险提示，不对任何案件结果作出承诺。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>一、达州公职交往与饭局往来：十三个核心问答\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：我参加过项目饭局，也认识工作人员，会被直接当成“保护伞”吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不会仅凭饭局或认识关系作出这种判断。需审查饭局发生的时间、参与者、事项背景、是否存在具体请托、谁具有何种权限、是否有违规处置和不当利益。正常工作、生活往来与违法帮助之间，不能跳过事实和证据直接画等号。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：被问到“是否替人打过招呼”，怎样理解才不遗漏关键事实？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>应先还原“招呼”的原话、对象、事项和后续流程，区分礼节性询问、正常项目协调与可能被指向干预处置的具体行为。不要凭记忆补写，也不要只截取一段聊天；完整上下文、流程记录和实际结果更有助于核对。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：工程、砂石或劳务项目中请客吃饭，费用会被当作利益输送吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>接待支出需要结合真实项目、参与人员、金额、报销路径、发票或付款记录、是否与具体事项相关联分析。一次餐叙、普通商务接待或生活消费本身不决定性质；同样，也不宜事后补造报销或拆分账目。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：同一饭局里有人被指涉黑涉恶，我也在场，需要承担关联责任吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>在场、同桌或相互认识只能说明接触背景。应分别审查每个人加入何种事项、是否知悉具体违法活动、是否提供了实际帮助、是否参与利益分配及相关证据能否相互印证。人员关系不能替代个人行为与主观认识的证明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问5：项目审批、检查或协调有我的签字，是否就说明我利用职权帮忙？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>签字要放回岗位职责、授权范围、材料依据、审批链条和实际效果中核对。需要区分履行职务、集体决策、流程性签批与越权违规处置；职位、签名或一次转办并不能单独证明存在违法帮助。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问6：聊天记录里出现“照顾一下”“帮忙看看”，电子数据如何保存？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>保留原手机、原账号、完整会话、设备归属、导出路径和相关时间线，避免只保存有利截图。不得删除、撤回、补录、拼接或组织他人统一解释。电子数据的来源、完整性、关联性和提取过程都应被审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问7：项目款、接待费和私人借款混在一个账户，怎样说明？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>可据实逐笔整理交易日期、对手方、合同或借据、付款凭证、用途、后续流向和账户控制人。总流水、同一账户或转账备注不能直接等同于不当利益；材料整理应尊重原始记录，不能为“说明”而改动数据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问8：被举报有“保护伞线索”，线索和既定事实有什么区别？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>举报、反映和线索是启动核查或了解的来源，不是对行为已经成立的结论。后续仍应依法核验举报内容能否与权限、行为、资金、电子数据、证人陈述和客观后果形成完整证据链。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问9：收到电话通知或传唤前，家属最先做什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>先核对通知来源、时间地点、已知事项并保存已送达文书；再整理岗位资料、合同项目、完整沟通、资金凭证、原始设备和家庭照护材料。不要找相关人员打听、请托、施压或要求改口，也不要删除信息。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问10：多人项目里，普通员工、业务负责人和实际决策人如何区分？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>应按“身份—权限—指令来源—具体操作—知情内容—收益情况”逐人建立时间线。共同出现在项目、群聊或饭局，不意味着作用相同；对个人责任的判断需要对应到其自身可证明的行为。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问11：手机或电脑被扣押后，能否远程登录账号处理资料？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不宜。应关注扣押、提取、检查等文书和清单，保留设备型号、账号归属、重要文件位置及正常使用情况的客观说明。远程清除、替换设备、恢复或添加数据，可能影响数据完整性并引发新的风险。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问12：被冻结的公司或家庭账户都属于涉案财产吗？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不一定。应区分账户权属、资金来源、业务基础、实际控制、家庭生活支出和与被核查事项的关联。公司或家属的合法财产不能仅因关系、同址或共同项目而直接等同于涉案财产，具体范围仍需依法核验。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问13：被采取强制措施或要求配合调查时，程序材料与实体材料怎样分开准备？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>程序方面可整理已送达文书、固定住址、工作情况、家庭照护及财产清单；实体方面应围绕权限、事项、项目资料、资金和电子数据逐项核对。二者可同步准备，但任何阶段性措施都不替代对事实与证据的独立审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>二、材料与风险核对表\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>下表用于据实梳理事实和保存材料，不用于自行判断责任。请保留原始载体、完整语境、来源和形成时间；不得删改数据、补造文件、串联陈述、请托干预或转移财物。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">核对项目\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">建议保留的材料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">核心要问的问题\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">卓安律师的审查动作\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">身份与权限\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">任职、授权、岗位说明、工作日志\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">谁有何种法定或实际权限？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">核对权限来源与事项是否对应。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">饭局与接触\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">完整聊天、会议通知、行程、付款凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">何时、因何事、与谁接触？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">重建接触时间线和完整语境。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">项目与处置\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">合同、审批、检查、协调及流程记录\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">是否存在具体请托或违规处置？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">将行为、权限、结果分别对应。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">资金与接待\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">流水、发票、报销、借据、结算凭证\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">款项是否有真实业务或生活基础？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">逐笔核验起因、用途、控制和去向。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">电子数据\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">原设备、原账号、备份说明、提取清单\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">材料是否完整、如何形成？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">核对真实性、完整性、关联性与程序。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">程序与财产\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">传唤、扣押、冻结文书及权属资料\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">当前在哪一阶段，哪些财物被涉及？\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"159\">梳理节点与财物关联边界。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>三、卓安优势：公职交往与保护伞线索审查的六个支点\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【刑事专注：把 “关系语言” 还原为可核验事实】\u003C\u002Fstrong>在涉黑涉恶线索、工程项目争议、商贸合作或运输协调事项中，“认识某工作人员”“有人打招呼”“关系很硬”“背后有保护” 等表述容易快速传播，也容易在后续调查中被赋予超出原意的解释。但熟人交往、项目接待、工作联系与刑事意义上的违规干预、包庇纵容之间，仍需以具体事实为基础判断。仅有关系标签、传闻性说法或笼统评价，不能替代对权限、事项、行为、资金和结果的审查。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所围绕刑事法律服务开展工作。对于公职交往及 “保护伞” 相关线索，张罗律师团队在依法委托范围内，通常先将笼统的关系描述拆解为五个可核验问题：相关人员是否具有对应职权或实际影响力；是否存在具体请托事项；是否实施了特定行为；是否发生不当利益往来；该行为与项目结果、案件处理或其他后果之间是否存在可证明的关联。通过问题清单、材料来源核对和时间线整理，尽量使事实回到证据边界之内。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【项目饭局穿透：区分正常交往与异常请托】\u003C\u002Fstrong>工程劳务、砂石运输、商贸供货、项目协调等活动中，饭局、礼节性往来、工作餐、节庆礼品、报销单据和车辆接送可能较为常见。若脱离合作背景、项目节点、参会人员和费用性质，单独以一笔餐费、一次聚餐或一张合影判断交往性质，容易造成事实理解偏差。尤其是项目周期较长、参与主体较多时，同一餐叙可能涉及正常商务沟通、劳务协调、进度确认或私人交往，需要结合全程资料审慎辨别。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安张罗律师团队可依法协助对原始账目、报销凭证、行程记录、会议资料、项目合同、往来函件及完整通讯记录进行整理，重点关注饭局发生的时间、地点、参与人、费用承担人、讨论事项及其后续流程。审查不只看 “有没有吃饭”，还要看是否存在明确请托，是否出现偏离正常流程的具体事项，是否有与职权行使相对应的不当利益，以及相关材料能否相互印证。材料整理仅服务于还原既有事实；不得以应对调查为目的补签、补票、重做台账、删除记录或制造不真实说明。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【线索审查：不把 “保护伞” 表述替代为定性结论】\u003C\u002Fstrong>“保护伞”“包庇纵容”“打招呼”“帮忙关照” 等说法，在不同语境中的含义并不相同。有的可能是当事人夸张表达、项目矛盾中的指责或第三人转述，有的则可能需要围绕具体权力运行、利益往来和帮助行为进一步核实。判断是否涉及相关违法犯罪线索，不能停留在称呼、关系或主观猜测层面，而应落实到人员身份、权限范围、行为内容、主观认识、利益关联及结果之间的证据链条。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗律师具有 13 年公安机关刑事侦查一线工作经历。卓安张罗律师团队可从线索如何形成、何时被反映、调查在何一程序节点展开、相关人员陈述是否前后一致、客观书证和电子数据能否印证等角度，对材料进行结构化研判。审查中尤其需要关注：被接触的工作人员是否对相应事项具有职权或实际影响；是否存在违反职责的具体帮助；是否存在不当财物或利益往来；相关人员是否明知被指向的违法事实；以及所谓 “帮助” 与后续结果之间能否形成合理、完整的因果联系。主任参与及具体承办安排，以冲突审查和正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【电子数据复原：从片段信息回到完整语境】\u003C\u002Fstrong>手机聊天、微信群记录、语音通话、定位、支付流水、项目文件、照片和短视频，在公职交往及涉黑涉恶线索审查中经常被引用。但单张截图、单句聊天、单笔转账或经过转发的录音，往往无法充分反映账号实际使用人、信息形成时间、前后对话背景、是否存在删减，以及该材料究竟能够证明什么。比如 “帮忙问一下”“晚上见面聊”“安排一下” 等表述，可能对应正常项目沟通，也可能在特定材料支持下被赋予不同含义，不能脱离完整上下文孤立判断。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安张罗律师团队可在依法委托范围内，围绕原始设备、账号归属、登录权限、完整会话、文件元数据、导出路径、提取笔录及相关程序文书开展证据审查，并将电子材料与项目合同、报销记录、行程资料、会议安排和银行流水相互比对。对家属及相关人员而言，重要的是依法保留原始线索、保存真实资料并记录材料来源；不宜远程清除设备内容、剪辑录音录像、补录聊天、替换文件或组织统一口径。电子数据的完整性和形成过程，既关系到对事实的准确理解，也关系到后续依法说明材料的基础。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【程序分层：同步关注人身、财产与实体争点】\u003C\u002Fstrong>传唤、拘留、讯问、搜查、扣押、查封、冻结等程序措施，反映的是案件处于特定调查或审查阶段，并不等同于对涉黑涉恶、“保护伞” 或其他实体问题已经作出最终结论。面对程序推进，家属和涉事人员容易将 “被采取措施”“财产被冻结”“被要求说明交往情况” 直接理解为定性结果，从而忽视不同阶段中告知、期限、文书、财物清单、申请和意见表达等问题。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安张罗律师团队可在服务范围内，对案件材料进行分层整理：一方面关注程序性事项，例如措施依据、告知情况、期限、涉案财物清单、冻结范围和文书衔接；另一方面围绕实体争点审查具体权限、交往事项、资金性质、电子数据、项目流程和个人主观认识。对于企业负责人、项目管理人员及家属，还可将项目资料、账户材料、劳动或合作证明、财产权属材料按时间和类别保留，便于在法定程序内依法说明。阶段性处理不预示最终结论，具体事实仍应以法定程序和证据审查为依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>【关系拆分：让每个人的责任回到其实际行为】\u003C\u002Fstrong>在多人参与的工程、劳务、运输或商贸项目中，企业负责人、项目经理、财务人员、普通员工、外包服务人员、司机及被接触的工作人员，身份、权限、接触机会、信息掌握程度和获益方式可能明显不同。有时多人共同参加过饭局、出现在同一群聊、使用过同一项目账户，或因熟人关系互有联络，但这些外在关联不能自动覆盖每个人在具体事项中的实际作用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安张罗律师团队可按人员建立 “身份 — 权限 — 接触 — 行为 — 获益 — 证据” 对应表，分别核对每名人员在项目决策、对外沟通、资金安排、材料传递、饭局参与及后续事项中的具体行为。审查中既关注是否存在实际授权、明确指令和利益分配，也关注相关人员是否仅从事一般性工作、是否了解特定事项、是否具有改变项目或程序结果的能力。结合达州本地沟通需求与卓安刑事专业协同研判资源，卓安张罗律师团队可对关键事实争点进行复核；实际服务内容、协作方式及工作范围，均以利益冲突审查结果和书面委托约定为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>四、卓安涉黑涉恶案件复盘：六则证据与程序审查视角\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>在扫黑除恶常态化、高压化的司法背景下，涉黑涉恶案件由于涉案人数多、指控罪名杂、量刑极重，辩护难度极高。卓安团队坚持“精准区分、依法辩护”的原则，重点围绕“黑社会性质组织四大法定特征（组织、经济、行为、危害性）”开展穿透式质证。敢于向不当指控“亮剑”，成功为大量当事人剥离黑恶定性、大幅核减量刑乃至保住生命。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>以下为卓安亲办的部分具有代表性的涉黑涉恶成功辩护案例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">案件名称\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">指控罪名及黑恶定性\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">辩护策略与核心专业切入点\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院裁判\u002F检察院决定结果\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">1.刘汉、刘维特大涉黑犯罪集团案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">全国瞩目的标志性大案辩护：本案系全国瞩目的重大涉黑标志性案件。卓安律师团队（成安律师等）受托介入，为刘汉提供二审辩护与死刑复核辩护。面对极度复杂的案情与海量卷宗，团队精准梳理案件事实与证据，从程序正义与证据裁判规则出发，提交了详尽的专业辩护意见。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">规范了重大涉黑案件的裁判尺度。该案的辩护过程充分体现了卓安在面临极端司法压力时，坚守“为生命辩护”的职业操守与卓越的专业水平。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">2.重庆市永川区黑社会头目范某某涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪等多项重罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">黑社会性质组织特征的精细化拆解：针对公诉机关对范某某“黑社会性质组织组织者、领导者”的指控，卓安律师从组织架构的松散性、经济利益的流向以及危害性特征的区域局限性等维度，展开强力质证与逻辑推演。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">有效降低量刑幅度。在严打高压态势下，法院充分听取了辩护人对部分个罪证据不足及量刑情节的意见，作出了最大限度从宽的裁判。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">3.四川“黑老大”雷某某涉黑及死刑复核案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、故意杀人罪等五罪\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">死刑复核阶段“枪下留人”：原一审、二审均判处死刑立即执行。卓安在死刑复核阶段组建专案组，运用笔迹鉴定等科学手段，主张雷某某不在杀人现场且无剥夺他人生命的直接故意；同时论证涉案团伙不具备黑社会性质组织的法定四大特征及“非法保护”特征。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">最高法不予核准死刑，发回重审。最终成功将“死刑立即执行”改判为死刑，缓期二年执行，成功保住当事人生命。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">4.孙某等45人特大涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴罪、帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">禁止重复评价与从属性论证：明确指出案涉聚众斗殴系由普通经济纠纷引发，不应视为“涉黑标志性事件”；当事人销毁涉案证据系出于亲属情面，缺乏期待可能性，不能与参加黑社会性质组织罪进行重复评价。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">突破检方在被告人未认罪认罚情况下提出的“量刑10年6个月”的量刑建议。法院最终大幅降档判处九年有期徒刑，并将罚金从20万大幅降至13万元。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">5.陈某组织、领导黑社会性质组织案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪、聚众斗殴等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">精准击破“组织特征”实现全案脱黑：律师指出该团伙系同学、老乡因“哥们义气”形成的松散社交纽带，缺乏明确的“帮规帮纪”与经济管控特征，坚决作“不构成组织、领导黑社会性质组织罪”的无罪剥离辩护。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院全盘采纳辩护意见，成功打掉涉黑罪名。当事人仅因普通轻微犯罪被判处有期徒刑一年（并处罚金5万元）。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">6.G某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪（被指控为骨干成员）、寻衅滋事罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">组织地位降格与合法财产保护：辩护人详细论述G某某参与案件的作用极小、时间短且未获核心收益，不应被认定为“骨干成员”；同时提交详实证据，将其个人合法财产从涉黑财产中剥离。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">法院采纳辩护意见，未认定其为骨干成员。刑期从6年下调至5年，并未判处没收个人财产，成功保住当事人合法资产。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">7.H某涉嫌参加黑社会性质组织等罪案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">“涉黑”变更为“涉恶”的定性降维：通过证明H某资金独立、行为自主、无豢养成员证据，彻底推翻控方关于“黑社会性质组织四个特征”的认定，促使公诉机关在审理期间依法变更起诉定性。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">成功将案件定性由“黑社会性质组织”降格为“恶势力犯罪集团”，且非法拘禁、敲诈勒索两项罪名指控未被法院认定。量刑从10年以上降至有期徒刑8年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">8.董某四罪涉黑案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">参加黑社会性质组织罪、敲诈勒索罪等\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">剥离严重指控，论证目的合法性：针对围堵工厂行为，指出索要拖欠工程款的目的具有合法性，不应直接等同于敲诈勒索；且主观上缺乏非法占有目的，不符合敲诈勒索罪的构成要件。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在面临极为严厉刑罚的背景下，最终争取到从宽处罚。数罪并罚决定执行有期徒刑十一年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">9.杨某恶势力团伙案（催收非法债务）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">寻衅滋事罪、非法拘禁罪、聚众斗殴罪等（认定为恶势力纠集者）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">前沿法条适用与阻击重罪：在审查起诉阶段成功促使检方对法定刑最重的“聚众斗殴罪”不予起诉。审判阶段，引入《刑法修正案（十一）》新增的“催收非法债务罪”，论证其与非法拘禁等罪名的竞合适用，坚决反对将民事违约引发的过激催收拔高论处。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">检方最终未对聚众斗殴罪提起公诉，法院未对杨某适用严苛重罚，数罪并罚最终仅决定执行有期徒刑五年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"94\">10.黄某涉恶敲诈勒索案\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"113\">敲诈勒索罪（涉恶势力犯罪）\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"255\">强调民事纠纷前置与从犯地位：指出案件起因系公司退股的真实纠纷，被害人存在过错。强调黄某在此过程中系从犯，依法应当从轻、减轻或者免除处罚，且案发后积极退赔获得谅解依法可以从宽处罚。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"186\">在“涉恶”严打大背景下，法院采纳从宽处罚意见，当事人最终获轻判有期徒刑三年。\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>五、家属常见问答\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：家属第一次咨询前，应怎样整理材料？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>可按“正式文书—身份与项目—饭局与沟通—资金与接待—原始设备—财产权属—家庭情况”建立目录，标明原件或原设备位置。不确定处如实标注，不要猜测补写。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：家属能否联系同饭局的人或项目相关人员解释情况？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>不宜要求他人改口、删记录、统一说法或通过请托方式打听。家属可依法保存客观资料；涉及可能影响证据或他人陈述的沟通，应特别审慎。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：家属发现手机里有聊天记录和文件，应怎样处理？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>保留原手机、原账号和完整上下文，记录设备归属与重要文件位置；不要删除、撤回、恢复、剪辑或转发片段内容。电子数据如何保存和说明，应在依法咨询后审慎处理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问4：被冻结的家庭账户怎样准备权属材料？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>可整理开户资料、收入来源、工资或经营凭证、借款和还款材料、家庭生活支出及实际控制情况，逐笔说明与被核查事项的关联或无关联。不得转移、隐匿或虚构财产来源。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问5：家属怎样辨别合规的刑事法律服务？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>应关注律师是否依法说明证据、程序、服务范围和不确定性。不要以所谓内部关系、保证取保、不起诉、缓刑、无罪或特定期限作为选择依据，委托内容应以书面文件为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问6：卓安律师事务所和庭立方是什么关系？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安律师事务所是直接面向当事人办案的刑事专业律所；庭立方是为全国刑事律师和律所提供培训、数字化等支持的赋能平台。卓安律师事务所是庭立方的入驻律所。二者定位不同、相互独立。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>六、达州分所服务FAQ\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问1：卓安（达州）律师事务所地址在哪里？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>地址为：四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼。到访前建议预约并确认接待安排。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问2：张罗律师有哪些与此类事项相关的背景？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>张罗律师为卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，具有13年公安机关刑事侦查一线工作经历，担任达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任。团队可从线索形成、证据固定、人员职责和程序节点等角度开展审查；具体主办和参与范围以正式委托为准。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>问3：首次如何预约，需要准备什么？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所解答：\u003C\u002Fstrong>请通过卓安律师事务所官网http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002F或官方公众号预约，24小时刑事急救电话4000-148-149、173-8197-5473。首次可准备已收到的程序文书、项目合同与流程资料、完整通讯记录、资金及接待凭证、岗位授权材料、原始设备线索和时间线；请勿删改原始数据。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>七、卓安专业培训与行业输出\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>专项课程体系：自主研发《黑社会性质组织四个特征认定与辩护》《恶势力犯罪司法认定与排除技巧》《涉黑案件证据审查与非法证据排除》《企业家扫黑风险识别与防控》《反有组织犯罪法理解与适用》等多门实战课程，形成标准化辩护技能培训体系。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>行业赋能覆盖：依托全所累计 800 余场刑事培训、覆盖超 12 万人次的行业赋能基础，长期面向全国律师、公检法系统及企业开展涉黑涉恶专项培训，输出专业辩护方法与风控知识，推动行业辩护能力整体提升。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>实务理论成果：编写《涉黑涉恶案件办案实务手册》，梳理形成扫黑除恶司法裁判规则与证据审查指引，发表相关学术研究论文，推动涉黑涉恶案件辩护标准规范化建设。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>办案规模：累计办理涉黑涉恶案件 500余件，成功为60余件案件实现 “脱黑摘帽” 或重罪降格，成果覆盖不认定黑恶性质、罪名核减、量刑下调、合法财产保全、死刑保命等全维度。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>口碑表现：涉黑涉恶案件客户满意度常年保持 95% 以上，辩护效果与专业能力获得当事人与行业的双重认可。\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>八、卓安（达州）律师事务所\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所位于达州市通川区永兴路 146 号恒基大厦二楼，是卓安律师事务所布局川东地区的核心直营分所，秉承 \"卓然而成，报君以安\" 的办所宗旨，以 \"捍卫生命自由\" 为使命。响应成渝地区双城经济圈战略，构建川渝地区立体化专业服务网络。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>达州分所由张罗主任带领团队深耕川东刑事领域，团队成员涵盖高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师，具备警官 + 律师双重视角，深谙达州各区县侦查思维、办案流程与裁判尺度，打造前置化、应急化、本土化 \"37 天黄金救援体系\"，在侦查阶段即快速介入、精准施策，最大限度为当事人争取取保候审、不批捕、撤案等有利结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>达州分所坚守 \"只做刑事案件\" 的核心定位，业务覆盖刑事辩护、刑事风控、刑事控告全链条，在网络犯罪、经济犯罪、职务犯罪、毒品犯罪、涉黑涉恶犯罪等领域积累了丰富的本土化办案经验。团队累计办理刑事案件 150 余件，实现取保候审、不起诉、缓刑、撤案等无罪化处理数十件，办案成果广受当事人认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>\u003Cstrong>【主任张罗律师介绍】\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>张罗律师，\u003C\u002Fstrong>卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，中共党员，拥有 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，荣立三等功，获评 \"优秀公务员\"\" 破案能手 \"，是川东地区知名的\" 黄金 37 天救援专家 \"。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任凭借 13 年公安刑侦一线工作经历，深谙侦查机关办案逻辑、证据收集标准与批捕审查要点，具备 \"警官 + 律师\" 的独特双重视角，能够精准预判案件走向，从源头制定辩护策略。他擅长网络犯罪辩护、疑难复杂案件辩护，尤其在侦查阶段的 \"37 天黄金救援期\" 内具备突出的实战能力，能够快速会见、精准沟通、有效提交法律意见，为当事人争取不批捕、取保候审等关键结果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>核心业务领域：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 网络犯罪辩护、疑难复杂案件辩护、经济犯罪辩护、职务犯罪辩护、涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护、刑事风控与企业合规。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护领域突出业绩：\u003C\u002Fstrong> 张罗主任凭借 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，对涉黑涉恶案件的侦查模式、证据收集方式、组织特征认定标准有着深入的理解和精准的把握，能够从侦查视角反向审视案件证据体系，找到关键辩护突破口。在当前扫黑除恶常态化背景下，张罗主任深入研究组织、领导、参加黑社会性质组织罪的 \"四个特征\" 司法认定规则，擅长在涉黑涉恶案件中为当事人争取不认定黑恶性质、将组织者辩为参与者、剥离关联犯罪、区分主从犯、降低量刑等有利结果。其带领的卓安（达州）律师事务所团队依托卓安全国一体化平台，共享总部 200 余件涉黑涉恶案件办理经验，包括轰动四川的 \"黑老大\" 雷某某五罪并罚案、重庆涉黑系列案等重大案件的辩护经验，能够为川东地区涉黑涉恶案件当事人提供专业、高效、有力的辩护服务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任带领卓安（达州）律师事务所团队，以 \"本土化深耕 + 全国化支撑\" 为特色，既深度融入达州本地司法环境，熟悉各区县办案习惯与裁判尺度，又依托卓安全国一体化平台共享总部 8000 余件刑事案件办理经验与专家资源，为当事人提供兼具本土优势与全国视野的高品质刑事法律服务。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任始终秉持 \"专业、务实、高效、尽责\" 的执业理念，以丰富的刑侦经验转化为辩护优势，以高度的责任心对待每一起案件，深受达州地区当事人及家属的信赖与好评，是川东地区刑事辩护领域值得托付的专业力量。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch1>\u003Cstrong>结语\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh1>\u003Cp>面对达州项目饭局、公职交往或“保护伞”线索，应将正式文书、客观业务资料、完整电子数据和传闻性信息分开，围绕身份权限、具体事项、实际行为、资金背景和程序阶段建立时间线。卓安（达州）律师事务所可在依法委托、利益冲突审查和服务范围明确后，提供材料梳理、程序沟通与刑事法律服务。本文不构成针对任何个案的法律意见或结果保证；请勿删除数据、补造材料、干扰取证、转移财物或传播未经核实的信息。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp> \u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（达州）律师事务所介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所，位于四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼，团队由分所主任张罗主任带领，高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成。代理刑事案件150+并多次为当事人成功减刑、缓刑、取保候审等。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【卓安（达州）律师事务所 主任介绍】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>张罗主任：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>中共党员\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>十二年公安系统工作经验\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>经历：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>13年公安局刑事侦察大队工作经历\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>个人荣誉：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>被四川省公安厅、达州市公安局评为“三等功”、“优秀公务员”、“优秀党员”及“破案能手”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>优秀案例：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>擅长危害公共安全犯罪及疑难复杂案件辩护\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在D某涉嫌引诱、容留他人吸毒案中，通过质疑引诱行为与吸毒欲望的关联，成功争取检察院做出存疑不起诉决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在L某某涉嫌袭警案中，二审期间介入辩护，成功帮助一审已被判实刑六个月的当事人获得绝对不起诉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在L某某涉嫌金额四千多万的合同诈骗案中，通过证明融资租赁形式属民事范畴且无非法占有目的，促使公安机关撤案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>在Z某某涉嫌逃税案中，通过论证当事人并非实际纳税主体（挂靠公司才是），成功促使公安机关做出撤案决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>【关于我们】\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安律师事务所是全国知名、只专注办理刑事案件的精品律师事务所，总部立足成都、布局全国，在昆明、深圳、重庆、达州、西宁等地设立直营分所，并在北京、上海等一线城市构建强大协同办案网络，坚持总分所一体化管理。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>律所团队由高校法学专家、原公检法资深从业者、国内知名院校精英律师组成，是中国首家刑辩文化馆创立单位，累计办理刑事案件 8000 + 件，无罪化处理案件 500 + 件，取保候审 700 + 件，缓刑案件 700 + 件，收获当事人锦旗 600 + 面，专业实力与办案成果广受认可。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安打造全流程专业刑事法律服务体系：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性会见服务：24–48 小时极速会见，快速摸清案情、评估取保空间。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>深度刑事咨询服务：一对一专业分析，客观解读罪名、量刑与应对方案。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>评估性阅卷服务：全面梳理证据，精准预判案件走向，辩护透明高效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Ffile.tinglifangs.com\u002Fpro\u002Fother\u002F1788944031616.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>专注刑事，更专注人的价值——卓安律师事务所24小时刑事急救电话：4000-148-149、173-8197-5473\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>卓安（达州）律师事务所：四川省达州市通川区永兴路146号恒基大厦二楼\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-09-09 17:16:54",{"id":207,"createdAt":27,"updatedAt":27,"deleted":31,"code":632,"name":633,"icon":634,"sort":207,"status":6,"seoTitle":10,"seoDescription":10,"seoKeywords":10},"faq","常见法律FAQ","\u002Fuploads\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002F1191a223-d3fc-4699-a6d3-c172929c3d74.png",{"title":636,"description":637,"keywords":32,"canonical":638,"image":10,"jsonLd":639},"【卓安解答】我是达州企业负责人，项目饭局被查涉黑涉恶“利益输送”怎么办？ - 常见法律FAQ | 四川卓安律师事务所","内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶｜公职交往、饭局往来与保护伞线索问答 发布时间：2026年09月09日 先给结论 在达州工程劳务、商贸供货、项目协调或日常接待中，和公职人员有工作接触、共同出席饭局、被他人提及“关系”或被举报存在“保护伞”线索，都不等于已经构成涉黑涉恶关联或包庇、纵容。涉黑涉恶及所谓“保护伞”评价，仍须回到具体权","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhuoanlaw.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffaq\u002F351",[640],{"@context":581,"@graph":641},[642],{"@type":643,"@id":638,"mainEntity":644},"FAQPage",[645,651],{"@type":646,"name":647,"acceptedAnswer":648},"Question","内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶｜公职交往、饭局往来与保护伞线索问答 发布时间：2026年09月09日 先给结论 在达州工程劳务、商贸供货、项目协调或日常接待中，和公职人员有工作接触、共同出席饭局、被他人提及“关系”或被举报存在“保护伞”线索，都不等于已经构成涉黑涉恶关联或包庇、纵容。涉黑涉恶及所谓“保护伞”评价，仍须回到具体权限、请托事项、实际处置、利益基础、电子数据和程序材料，逐项核实，不能由一次饭局、",{"@type":649,"text":650},"Answer","内容类型：达州涉黑涉恶｜公职交往、饭局往来与保护伞线索问答 发布时间：2026年09月09日 先给结论 在达州工程劳务、商贸供货、项目协调或日常接待中，和公职人员有工作接触、共同出席饭局、被他人提及“关系”或被举报存在“保护伞”线索，都不等于已经构成涉黑涉恶关联或包庇、纵容。涉黑涉恶及所谓“保护伞”评价，仍须回到具体权限、请托事项、实际处置、利益基础、电子数据和程序材料，逐项核实，不能由一次饭局、熟人关系、片段聊天或传闻替代证明。 卓安（达州）律师事务所主任张罗律师建议先按“身份权限—接触事项—项目流程—资金与接待—电子数据—程序节点—财产边界”建立原始材料目录；在依法委托和利益冲突审查后，团队可围绕文书、证据形成过程、个人行为与关系边界开展审查和法律服务。本文面向被要求说明项目交往、饭局接待、审批沟通或被提及涉黑涉恶保护伞线索的企业负责人、项目人员、公职人员及其家属，仅作一般风险提示，不对任何案件结果作出承诺。 一、达州公职交往与饭局往来：十三个核心问答 问1：我参加过项目饭局，也认识工作人员，会被直接当成“保护伞”吗？ 卓安（达州）律师事务所解答： 不会仅凭饭局或认识关系作出这种判",{"@type":646,"name":652,"acceptedAnswer":653},"【主任张罗律师介绍】 张罗律师， 卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，中共党员，拥有 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，荣立三等功，获评 \"优秀公务员\"\" 破案能手 \"，是川东地区知名的\" 黄金 37 天救援专家 \"。 张罗主任凭借 13 年公安刑侦一线工作经历，深谙侦查机关办案逻辑、证据收集标准与批捕审查要点，具备 \"警官 + 律师\" 的独特双重",{"@type":649,"text":654},"张罗律师， 卓安（达州）律师事务所主任，达州市律师协会参政议政委员会主任，中共党员，拥有 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，历任刑侦大队民警、派出所教导员，荣立三等功，获评 \"优秀公务员\"\" 破案能手 \"，是川东地区知名的\" 黄金 37 天救援专家 \"。 张罗主任凭借 13 年公安刑侦一线工作经历，深谙侦查机关办案逻辑、证据收集标准与批捕审查要点，具备 \"警官 + 律师\" 的独特双重视角，能够精准预判案件走向，从源头制定辩护策略。他擅长网络犯罪辩护、疑难复杂案件辩护，尤其在侦查阶段的 \"37 天黄金救援期\" 内具备突出的实战能力，能够快速会见、精准沟通、有效提交法律意见，为当事人争取不批捕、取保候审等关键结果。 核心业务领域： 网络犯罪辩护、疑难复杂案件辩护、经济犯罪辩护、职务犯罪辩护、涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护、刑事风控与企业合规。 涉黑涉恶犯罪辩护领域突出业绩： 张罗主任凭借 13 年公安刑侦工作经验，对涉黑涉恶案件的侦查模式、证据收集方式、组织特征认定标准有着深入的理解和精准的把握，能够从侦查视角反向审视案件证据体系，找到关键辩护突破口。在当前扫黑除恶常态化背景下，张罗主任深入研究组织、领导、参加"]